Minimally invasive surgery is a kind of surgical operation, which is performed by using professional surgical instruments and equipment to inactivate, resect, repair or reconstruct the pathological changes, deformities and wounds in human body through micro-trauma or micro-approach, in order to achieve the goal of treatment, its surgical effect is equivalent to the traditional open surgery, while avoiding the morbidity of conventional surgical wounds. In addition, it also has the advantages of less trauma, less blood loss during operation, less psychological burden and quick recovery on patients, and these minimally invasive techniques provide unique value for the examination and treatment of gastric cancer patients. Surgical minimally invasive surgical techniques have developed rapidly and offer numerous options for the treatment of early gastric cancer (EGC): endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), underwater EMR (UEMR), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR), endoscopic submucosal excavation (ESE), submucosal tunnel endoscopic resection), laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS); Among them, EMR, EFTR and LECS technologies have a wide range of applications and different modifications have been derived from their respective surgical operations, such as band-assisted EMR (BA-EMR), conventional EMR (CEMR), over-the-scope clip-assisted EFTR, no-touch EFTR, the inverted LECS, closed LECS, and so on. These new and improved minimally invasive surgeries are more precise, specific and effective in treating different types of EGC.

In the treatment of small gastric subepithelial tumors originating from muscularis propria (SET-MPs), endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) has been an effective procedure and ligation-assisted EFTR (EFTR-L) seems a feasible and promising operation. We aimed to compare the therapeutic outcomes of EFTR-L and EFTR to evaluate effect and safety of either method in the treatment of small (≤ 1.5 cm) gastric SET-MPs.

Between January 2018 to May 2022, we retrospectively enrolled a total of 119 patients with gastric SET-MPs treated by EFTR-L (79 patients) or EFTR (40 patients) at Xiangya Hospital Central South University. Clinical characteristics, operation efficacy, adverse events (AEs), and operation cost were compared between the 2 groups. Univariate and multiple logistic and linear regressions were applied to analyze the therapeutic outcomes of the procedure, and covariates were adjusted in the multiple analysis.

The operation time of EFTR-L group (16.34 ± 5.75 min) was significantly shorter than EFTR group (51.23 ± 21.21 min, P < 0.001), and the difference remained significant after adjusting the covariates (adjusted mean difference, 30.56; 95% confidence interval, 25.65-35.47; P < 0.001). The operation cost of EFTR-L group was lower than EFTR group (1268.52 ± 457.22 vs 1643.18 ± 295.08 $; P < 0.001). The complete resection rate of the EFTR-L group was 98.72% and of the EFTR group 100%. The incidence of abdominal pain in the EFTR-L group (5.06%) was lower than in the EFTR group (27.50%, P = 0.008). A patient in the EFTR group underwent severe pneumoperitoneum and received abdominocentesis during operation. One case of peritonitis occurred in the EFTR-L group but recovered from intensified antibiotic therapy. No delayed blood or perforation occurred.

Compared to EFTR, EFTR-L might be a feasible procedure for small (≤ 1.5 cm) gastric SET-MPs due to the acceptable efficacy, shorter operation time, and lower cost.

Three types of gadoxetic acid enhanced MRI parameters have been proposed to quantify liver function. However, until now there is no consensus on which one that has the greatest potential for use in clinical practice. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy of three types of gadoxetic acid enhanced MR parameters for quantitative assessment of liver function.

Imaging data of 10 patients with chronic liver disease and 20 healthy volunteers were analyzed. Parameters based on signal intensity(SI), T1 changes or dynamic-hepatocyte-specific-contrast-enhancement MR were calculated. Their mutual correlations, discriminatory capacity between cirrhotic and healthy liver and correlations with Child-Pugh score and Model for end-stage liver-disease (MELD) were estimated.

The strongest correlations were observed between relative enhancement of the liver and T1 time at 20 min after contrast agent injection, and between liver-spleen contrast ratio at 20 min after contrast agent injection and hepatic uptake rate (|r|> 0.90, p < .05, both). All parameters but input-relative blood flow (p = 0.17) were significantly different between patient and control group (p < .05), with AUROCs of liver-to-muscle ratio (LMR), increase of LMR and hepatic extraction fraction greater than 0.90 (p < .05). Liver-to-spleen ratio, LMR and hepatic uptake index presented a strong correlation with Child-Pugh score and MELD (|r|> 0.8, p < .05).

Simple SI-based parameters were as good as more complex parameters in evaluating liver function at gadoxetic acid enhanced MR. In clinical routine LMR seems to be the easiest-to-use parameter for quantitative evaluation of liver function.

Complications of patients with liver disease generally occurs as the consequence of advanced fibrosis and portal hypertension. Non-invasive tools to predict the complications may allow for better risk-stratification and medical management in patients with cirrhosis. The goals of this study were to determine the utility of CT-scan based liver and spleen volume measurement in association with complications and outcomes in patients with cirrhosis.

Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of 556 patients with cirrhosis who underwent CT scan of the abdomen between January 1-June 30,2009 were reviewed. Liver and spleen volume were measured using semi-automated interactive software and compared to 47 healthy controls. The association between liver and spleen volume and complications of cirrhosis was determined. Independent predictors of survival were analyzed with Cox regression model.

Patients with cirrhosis had significantly lower total and functional liver volume, larger total and functional spleen volume, and significantly lower total liver to spleen volume ratio when compared to controls. Liver volume, spleen volume, and liver to spleen volume ratio were significantly altered in patients with decompensated stage. Patients with hepatic encephalopathy had significantly lower total liver volume and spleen size was associated with the presence of esophageal varices. Patients with cirrhosis who underwent liver transplantation had significantly lower total liver volume and larger total spleen volume. However, spleen volume was not an independent predictor for mortality.

Baseline liver and spleen volume and its ratio are significantly altered in patients with cirrhosis. Spleen volume is also associated with the presence of esophageal varices.