1
|
Nomura S, Saito K, Fujisawa M, Kitahara M, Kuniyoshi N, Imazu H, Kogure H. Usefulness of simplified comprehensive geriatric assessment as a pre-ERCP screening for the elderly. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES 2025; 32:246-253. [PMID: 39641145 DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.12093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is often performed in elderly patients for stone removal and biliary drainage following common bile duct stones or malignant biliary obstruction. Safety in ERCP should be considered in elderly patients due to complications and decreased activities of daily living (ADL), but there are no adequate pretest evaluation criteria. In recent years, the usefulness of the comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) for planning treatment and predicting prognosis has been reported. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients who underwent ERCP at our institution between October 2021 and June 2023. The relationship between CGA and ERCP outcomes was examined by dividing CGA scores into three groups (Group A; score 0, Group B; score 1-4, Group C; score 5-7) among patients 65 years of age and older. Risk factors for prolonged hospitalization were identified using univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS Of the 388 patients, 290 were 65 or older with a CGA score. The median length of hospital stay was significantly longer in the higher CGA7 scores group (5 vs. 8 vs. 15 days, p < .01). There was no significant difference in the rate of adverse events (p = .54) and median total procedure time (p = .35). In univariate and multivariate analysis, higher CGA score groups were significant risk factors for a prolonged hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS CGA appears to be a valuable tool for preadmission screening in elderly patients undergoing ERCP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuzo Nomura
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kei Saito
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mariko Fujisawa
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mai Kitahara
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Noriyuki Kuniyoshi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroo Imazu
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hirofumi Kogure
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Heil TC, van Oostrum M, Holwerda E, Stegmann ME, van Munster BC, Brandenbarg D. Survival After Wait-and-See Approach in Older Patients With Unexplained Iron Deficiency Anemia in Primary Care: A Practice Evaluation. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2024; 25:104887. [PMID: 38103569 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2023.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Revised: 11/06/2023] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Guidelines recommend upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopic evaluation for patients without a clear physiological explanation for iron deficiency anemia (IDA). However, the consequences of watchful waiting in older patients with unexplained IDA in general practice are unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate characteristics and survival of patients with an unexplained IDA in general practice who refrain from medical specialist evaluation. DESIGN Historical prospective study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Patients aged ≥70 years with IDA coded in their medical records were selected from the Dutch Academic General Practitioner Development Network (AHON) database. METHODS Based on their medical records, patients with an unexplained IDA were classified as (1) referred for medical specialist evaluation, or (2) no or noninvasive evaluation in general practice. RESULTS Compared to patients who were referred for medical specialist evaluation (n = 235, 47.8%), patients who had no or noninvasive evaluation (n = 257; 52.5%) were older (median respectively 79 vs 82 years old, P < .01) and more likely to have congestive heart failure (respectively 17.4% and 26.1%, P = .02) and dementia (respectively 2.6% and 8.9%, P < .01). Two-year survival was significantly higher in patients who were referred for medical specialist evaluation compared to patients who had no or noninvasive evaluation (respectively, 83.9% and 75.5%, P = .02). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS Although mortality was significantly higher in the older and more comorbid patients who had no or noninvasive evaluation in general practice, survival was still high in this patient group. Therefore, non-guideline adherence and a wait-and-see approach could be discussed in a shared-decision-making consultation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thea C Heil
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, University of Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Maartje van Oostrum
- Department of Primary and Long-Term Care, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Elodie Holwerda
- Department of Primary and Long-Term Care, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Mariken E Stegmann
- Department of Primary and Long-Term Care, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Barbara C van Munster
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Daan Brandenbarg
- Department of Primary and Long-Term Care, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kim SY, Lee JK, Lee KH, Jang JY, Kim BW. The Impact of Sedation on Cardio-Cerebrovascular Adverse Events after Surveillance Esophagogastroduodenoscopy in Patients with Gastric Cancer: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study. Gut Liver 2024; 18:245-256. [PMID: 37317513 PMCID: PMC10938152 DOI: 10.5009/gnl230043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Revised: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Background/Aims The impact of sedation on cardio-cerebrovascular (CCV) adverse events after esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) in patients with gastric cancer (GC) is unclear. We investigated the incidence rate and impact of sedation on CCV adverse events after surveillance EGD in patients with GC. Methods We performed a nationwide population-based cohort study using the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service databases from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2020. Using a propensity score-matched analysis, patients with GC were divided into two groups: sedative agent users and nonusers for surveillance EGD. We compared the occurrence of CCV adverse events within 14 days between the two groups. Results Of the 103,463 patients with GC, newly diagnosed CCV adverse events occurred in 2.57% of patients within 14 days after surveillance EGD. Sedative agents were used in 41.3% of the patients during EGD. The incidence rates of CCV adverse events with and without sedation were 173.6/10,000 and 315.4/10,000, respectively. Between sedative agent users and nonusers based on propensity score matching (28,008 pairs), there were no significant differences in the occurrence of 14-day CCV, cardiac, cerebral, and other vascular adverse events (2.28% vs 2.22%, p=0.69; 1.44% vs 1.31%, p=0.23; 0.74% vs 0.84%, p=0.20; 0.10% vs 0.07%, p=0.25, respectively). Conclusions Sedation during surveillance EGD was not associated with CCV adverse events in patients with GC. Therefore, the use of sedative agents may be considered in patients with GC during surveillance EGD without excessive concerns about CCV adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sang Yoon Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Myongji Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea
| | - Jun Kyu Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea
| | - Kwang Hyuck Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae-Young Jang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Byung-Wook Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon, Korea
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chen MZ, Tan M, Walter T, Rich G, Barto W. Colonoscopy in the nonagenarian population. ANZ J Surg 2023; 93:2143-2147. [PMID: 36881524 DOI: 10.1111/ans.18374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2022] [Revised: 02/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/25/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND With increasing life expectancy, there is an increasing proportion of nonagenarians undergoing both elective and emergency surgical procedures. The decision as to whom will benefit from surgical procedures is however difficult to ascertain and still remains a challenge to clinicians. This study is aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of colonoscopy in the nonagenarian population, and to determine if the outcomes are acceptable for us to continue to offer such interventions. METHODS Retrospective study of patients of Dr. G.R (Gastroenterologist) and Dr. W.B (Colorectal Surgeon) between 1 January 2018 and 31 November 2022. All patients who were ≥90 years old and had a colonoscopy was included in the study. Exclusion criteria were patients who were less than 90 years old, had a flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy as part of their surgical procedure. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES post-colonoscopy complications and length of stay. SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES reasons for colonoscopy, significant colonoscopy findings, 30-day morbidity and mortality. RESULTS Sixty patients were included in the study. Median age was 91 (90-100) years old. 33.3% of the patients were males. Seventy percent of the patients were ASA 3. Median length of hospital stay was 1 day. 11.7% of patients were found to have colorectal malignancy. There were no complications after the colonoscopy. There were no 30-day re-admission, morbidity or mortality. CONCLUSION Colonoscopy can be performed safely in carefully selected nonagenarian patients with acceptable low complication rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Zhiyun Chen
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Nepean Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Min Tan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Nepean Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Tim Walter
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Australian National University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Graeme Rich
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Australian National University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Walid Barto
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Nepean Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Surgery, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Le KHN, Low EE, Yadlapati R. Evaluation of Esophageal Dysphagia in Elderly Patients. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2023; 25:146-159. [PMID: 37312002 PMCID: PMC10726678 DOI: 10.1007/s11894-023-00876-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/10/2023] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW While guidelines exist for the evaluation and management of esophageal dysphagia in the general population, dysphagia disproportionately affects the elderly. In this article, we reviewed the literature on evaluating esophageal dysphagia in elderly patients and proposed a diagnostic algorithm based on this evidence. RECENT FINDINGS In older patients, dysphagia is often well compensated for by altered eating habits and physiologic changes, underreported by patients, and missed by healthcare providers. Once identified, dysphagia should be differentiated into oropharyngeal and esophageal dysphagia to guide diagnostic workup. For esophageal dysphagia, this review proposes starting with endoscopy with biopsies, given its relative safety even in older patients and potential for interventional therapy. If endoscopy shows a structural or mechanical cause, then further cross-sectional imaging should be considered to assess for extrinsic compression, and same session endoscopic dilation should be considered for strictures. If biopsies and endoscopy are normal, then esophageal dysmotility is more likely, and high-resolution manometry and additional workup should be performed following the updated Chicago Classification. Even after diagnosis of the root cause, complications including malnutrition and aspiration pneumonia should also be assessed and monitored, as they both result from and can further contribute to dysphagia. The successful evaluation of esophageal dysphagia in elderly patients requires a thorough, standardized approach to collecting a history, selection of appropriate diagnostic workup, and assessment of risk of potential complications, including malnutrition and aspiration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Eric E Low
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Rena Yadlapati
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.
- , La Jolla, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gornick D, Kadakuntla A, Trovato A, Stetzer R, Tadros M. Practical considerations for colorectal cancer screening in older adults. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2022; 14:1086-1102. [PMID: 35949211 PMCID: PMC9244986 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v14.i6.1086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2021] [Revised: 03/23/2022] [Accepted: 04/30/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Recent guidelines recommend that colorectal cancer (CRC) screening after age 75 be considered on an individualized basis, and discourage screening for people over 85 due to competing causes of mortality. Given the heterogeneity in the health of older individuals, and lack of data within current guidelines for personalized CRC screening approaches, there remains a need for a clearer framework to inform clinical decision-making. A revision of the current approach to CRC screening in older adults is even more compelling given the improvements in CRC treatment, post-treatment survival, and increasing life expectancy in the population. In this review, we aim to examine the personalization of CRC screening cessation based on specific factors influencing life and health expectancy such as comorbidity, frailty, and cognitive status. We will also review screening modalities and endoscopic technique for minimizing risk, the risks of screening unique to older adults, and CRC treatment outcomes in older patients, in order to provide important information to aid CRC screening decisions for this age group. This review article offers a unique approach to this topic from both the gastroenterologist and geriatrician perspective by reviewing the use of specific clinical assessment tools, and addressing technical aspects of screening colonoscopy and periprocedural management to mitigate screening-related complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dana Gornick
- Albany Medical College, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY 12208, United States
| | - Anusri Kadakuntla
- Albany Medical College, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY 12208, United States
| | - Alexa Trovato
- Albany Medical College, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY 12208, United States
| | - Rebecca Stetzer
- Division of Geriatrics, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY 12208, United States
| | - Micheal Tadros
- Division of Gastroenterology, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY 12208, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ergenç M, Uprak TK. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy in Patients Aged 75 Years and Older: A Single-Center Study. Cureus 2022; 14:e21846. [PMID: 35291530 PMCID: PMC8896878 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.21846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
|
8
|
Kawamura T, Sakiyama N, Tanaka K, Yokota I, Uno K, Yasuda K. Ischemic Colitis Caused by Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy. Gastroenterology Res 2021; 14:296-303. [PMID: 34804274 PMCID: PMC8577598 DOI: 10.14740/gr1461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2021] [Accepted: 09/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Ischemic colitis is an adverse event which may occur during bowel preparation for colonoscopy. This study aims to clarify both the incidence and the risk factors of this complication. Methods This was a single-center, retrospective, observational study. All outpatients who were prescribed standardized preparation drugs for colonoscopy at the Kyoto Second Red Cross Hospital between November 2011 and March 2020 were included in the study. A split bowel preparation was carried out as follows; magnesium citrate with or without sodium picosulfate hydrate was/were used as a preparation drug on the day before the colonoscopy, and polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution or sodium phosphate was used on the morning of the endoscopic procedure. Patients were extracted from the electronic medical records and matched with the endoscopy database by examination date and hospital identification number. Following the endoscopic findings, both the incidence and risk factors for ischemic colitis arising after bowel preparation were examined. Results Among the 14,924 patients analyzed, ischemic colitis was observed in 14 patients (0.09%). Multivariate analysis revealed that old age (≥ 75 years old) and strong preparation (magnesium citrate with sodium picosulfate and polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution) for constipated patients were independent risk factors for ischemic colitis (odds ratio: 3.64 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.36 - 9.77) and 4.27 (95% CI: 1.45 - 12.53), respectively). Conclusions The age 75 years and above and strong preparation for patients with constipation were independent risk factors for ischemic colitis prior to colonoscopy. Careful attention should be paid to bowel preparation before colonoscopy for patients aged ≥ 75 years and for those with constipation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takuji Kawamura
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kyoto Second Red Cross Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Naokuni Sakiyama
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kyoto Second Red Cross Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kiyohito Tanaka
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kyoto Second Red Cross Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Isao Yokota
- Department of Biostatistics, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Koji Uno
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kyoto Second Red Cross Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kenjiro Yasuda
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kyoto Second Red Cross Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Okamoto T, Nakamura K, Yamamoto K, Yoshimoto T, Takasu A, Shiratori Y, Ikeya T, Okuyama S, Takagi K, Fukuda K. Safety and Effectiveness of Endoscopic Band Ligation for Colonic Diverticular Bleeding in Elderly Patients. Digestion 2021; 102:760-766. [PMID: 33556954 DOI: 10.1159/000513310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2020] [Accepted: 11/24/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Colonic diverticulosis increases with age, leading to a higher risk of colonic diverticular bleeding (CDB) in the elderly. As life expectancy continues to increase, the need for endoscopic hemostasis for CDB in the elderly can also be expected to increase. However, there have been no reports to date on the feasibility of endoscopic hemostasis for elderly CDB patients. Several recent studies have addressed the effectiveness of endoscopic band ligation (EBL) for CDB. In this study, we evaluate the safety and effectiveness of EBL in elderly CDB patients compared to younger CDB patients. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of consecutive patients treated with EBL for the first time at a tertiary referral center between March 2011 and November 2017. Patients were grouped according to age into those at least 75 years old (the Elderly) and those <75 years old (the Nonelderly). Patient characteristics, technical success, and complications were compared between the two groups. RESULTS EBL was performed in 153 patients during the study period (49 Elderly patients and 104 Nonelderly patients). Elderly patients were less likely to be male (p < 0.001) and had lower hemoglobin levels on admission (p < 0.001). Bleeding on the right side of the splenic flexure was observed more frequently in the Nonelderly (p = 0.002). Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and use of antithrombotic agents were significantly higher in the Elderly (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). Active bleeding tended to be observed more frequently in the Elderly (p = 0.054), while the difference was not significant. There were no significant differences in the shock index, procedure time, or units of packed red blood cells transfused between the 2 groups. No significant differences in the technical success rate (97.1 vs. 98%, p = 0.76), early rebleeding rate (10.2 vs. 14.4%, p = 0.47), or other complications (2 vs. 1%, p = 0.58) were observed. Perforation and abscess formation were not observed in either group. Female gender, left-sidedness, higher CCI, and lower hemoglobin level were all significantly more frequently observed in the Elderly on multiple logistic regression analysis. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION EBL may be similarly safe and effective for the treatment of CDB in the elderly as in the nonelderly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takeshi Okamoto
- Department of Gastroenterology, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kenji Nakamura
- Department of Gastroenterology, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan, .,Department of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Dental College, Ichikawa General Hospital, Chiba, Japan,
| | - Kazuki Yamamoto
- Department of Gastroenterology, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takaaki Yoshimoto
- Department of Gastroenterology, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ayaka Takasu
- Department of Gastroenterology, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yasutoshi Shiratori
- Department of Gastroenterology, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Ikeya
- Department of Gastroenterology, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shuhei Okuyama
- Department of Gastroenterology, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Koichi Takagi
- Department of Gastroenterology, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Katsuyuki Fukuda
- Department of Gastroenterology, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lee CJ, Vemulapalli KC, Rex DK. Colorectal EMR outcomes in octogenarians versus younger patients referred for removal of large (≥20 mm) nonpedunculated polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 93:699-703. [PMID: 33075367 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.10.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2020] [Accepted: 10/09/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Data are limited on safety and outcomes of colorectal EMR in octogenarians (≥80 years old). We sought to review outcome data for patients aged ≥80 in a prospectively collected database of patients referred for large polyp removal. METHODS We retrospectively evaluated a database of patients referred for large (≥20 mm) nonpedunculated polyp removal. From 2000 to 2019, we compared the rates of follow-up, recurrence, adverse events, and synchronous neoplasia detection between younger patients and patients aged ≥80. RESULTS There were 167 patients aged ≥80 years and 1686 <80 years. Patients in the elderly group returned for surveillance less often (67.1% vs 75.1%, P = .024), had greater first follow-up recurrence rates (27.5% vs 13.8%, P < .001), but had similar adverse event rates (1.8% vs 2.8%, P = .619) compared with younger patients. Rates of synchronous neoplasia were similar and high in both groups. CONCLUSIONS EMR is safe and well tolerated for large polyp removal in patients over 80 years old. Patients aged ≥80 years are less likely to present for follow-up after EMR. They had a higher recurrence rate and a similarly high prevalence of synchronous precancerous lesions. Follow-up after EMR should be encouraged in the elderly, and an attempt to clear the colon of synchronous disease at the time of the initial EMR may be warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher J Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Krishna C Vemulapalli
- Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Douglas K Rex
- Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
The Impact of the Aging Population on Surgical Diseases. CURRENT GERIATRICS REPORTS 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s13670-020-00352-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
12
|
Mönkemüller K, Fry LC. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Considerations. GERIATRIC GASTROENTEROLOGY 2021:879-908. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-30192-7_31] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2025]
|
13
|
Zhou R, Li S, Cheng B, Fang X. Atrial Myxoma Presenting as Atrial Flutter During Sedation for Esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Am J Med 2020; 133:e735-e736. [PMID: 32562603 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2020.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2020] [Revised: 04/30/2020] [Accepted: 05/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Zhou
- Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Shuangyue Li
- Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Department of Anesthesiology, Ningbo Yinzhou Second Hospital, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China
| | - Baoli Cheng
- Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Xiangming Fang
- Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Burton JK, Yates LC, Whyte L, Fitzsimons E, Stott DJ. New horizons in iron deficiency anaemia in older adults. Age Ageing 2020; 49:309-318. [PMID: 32103233 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afz199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2019] [Revised: 11/17/2019] [Accepted: 01/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) is common in older adults and associated with a range of adverse outcomes. Differentiating iron deficiency from other causes of anaemia is important to ensure appropriate investigations and treatment. It is possible to make the diagnosis reliably using simple blood tests. Clinical evaluation and assessment are required to help determine the underlying cause and to initiate appropriate investigations. IDA in men and post-menopausal females is most commonly due to occult gastrointestinal blood loss until proven otherwise, although there is a spectrum of underlying causative pathologies. Investigation decisions should take account of the wishes of the patient and their competing comorbidities, individualising the approach. Management involves supplementation using oral or intravenous (IV) iron then consideration of treatment of the underlying cause of deficiency. Future research areas are outlined including the role of Hepcidin and serum soluble transferrin receptor measurement, quantitative faecal immunochemical testing, alternative dosing regimens and the potential role of IV iron preparations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Kirsty Burton
- Academic Section of Geriatric Medicine, Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
- Glasgow Royal Infirmary, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - Luke C Yates
- Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - Lindsay Whyte
- Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - Edward Fitzsimons
- Department of Haematology, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - David J Stott
- Academic Section of Geriatric Medicine, Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ribeiro Gomes AC, Pinho R, Rodrigues A, Ponte A, Carvalho J. Enteroscopy in the Elderly: Review of Procedural Aspects, Indications, Yield, and Safety. GE-PORTUGUESE JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY 2019; 27:18-28. [PMID: 31970236 DOI: 10.1159/000499678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2018] [Accepted: 02/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Background As human longevity continues to increase, age-related diseases are more common, which leads to a higher use of gastroenterology services. Endoscopic procedures are generally considered to be of higher risk in the elderly with multiple comorbidities. However, some endoscopic techniques have already been proved to be well tolerated in the elderly. Summary <underline></underline>Enteroscopy enables the nonsurgical diagnosis and therapeutic management of a wide variety of small bowel diseases. Although it has been shown to be safe and effective, with high diagnostic yield and therapeutic success rate in the general population, its safety and efficacy in the elderly is largely unknown, and there are still some concerns about its use in these patients. Key Messages This review will focus on enteroscopy in elderly people, taking into account patient and procedure characteristics, indications, findings, yield, and complication rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Catarina Ribeiro Gomes
- Department of Gastroenterology, Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal
| | - Rolando Pinho
- Department of Gastroenterology, Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal
| | - Adélia Rodrigues
- Department of Gastroenterology, Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal
| | - Ana Ponte
- Department of Gastroenterology, Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal
| | - João Carvalho
- Department of Gastroenterology, Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Piper MS, Maratt JK, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Lewis C, Forman J, Vijan S, Metko V, Saini SD. Patient Attitudes Toward Individualized Recommendations to Stop Low-Value Colorectal Cancer Screening. JAMA Netw Open 2018; 1:e185461. [PMID: 30646275 PMCID: PMC6324357 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.5461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Guidelines for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening recommend an individualized approach in older adults that is informed by consideration of life expectancy and cancer risk. However, little is known about how patients perceive individualized screening recommendations. OBJECTIVE To assess veterans' attitudes toward and comfort with cessation of low-value CRC screening (defined as screening in a patient for whom the benefit is expected to be small based on quantitative estimates from hypothetical risk calculators). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This survey study included patients older than 50 years who had undergone prior screening colonoscopy with normal results at the Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System. A total of 1500 surveys were mailed to potential participants from November 1, 2010, to January 1, 2012. Survey data were analyzed from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2017. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Response to the question, "If you personally had serious health problems that were likely to shorten your life and your doctor did not think screening would be of much benefit based on the calculator, how comfortable would you be with not getting any more screening colonoscopies?" RESULTS Of the 1500 surveys mailed, 85 were returned to sender, leaving 1415 potential respondents; 1054 of these respondents (median age range, 60-69 years; 884 [85.9%] white and 965 [94.2%] male) completed the survey (response rate, 74.5%). A total of 300 (28.7%) were not at all comfortable with cessation of low-value CRC screening, and 509 (49.3%) thought that age should never be used to decide when to stop screening. In addition, 332 (31.7%) thought it was not at all reasonable to use life expectancy calculators, and 255 (24.3%) thought it was not at all reasonable to use CRC risk calculators to guide these decisions. In ordered logistic regression analysis, factors associated with more comfort with screening cessation were (1) higher trust in physician (odds ratio [OR], 1.19; 95% CI, 1.07-1.32), (2) higher perceived health status (OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.23-1.61), and (3) higher barriers to screening (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.11-1.30). Factors that were associated with less comfort with screening cessation included (1) greater perceived effectiveness of screening (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.80-0.94) and (2) greater perceived threat of CRC (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.73-0.89). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The findings suggest that many veterans have strong preferences against screening cessation even when given detailed information about why the benefit may be low. Efforts to tailor screening recommendations may be met by resistance unless they are accompanied by efforts to address underlying perceptions about the benefit of screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc S. Piper
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Providence-Providence Park Hospital, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Southfield
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Jennifer K. Maratt
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher
- Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor
- Division of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Carmen Lewis
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora
| | - Jane Forman
- Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Services Research and Development Service Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Sandeep Vijan
- Division of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
- Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Services Research and Development Service Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Valbona Metko
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Sameer D. Saini
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
- Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Services Research and Development Service Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Efficacy and Safety of Therapeutic ERCP in the Elderly: A Single Center Experience. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2018; 28:e44-e48. [PMID: 29252934 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000000499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has been an important therapeutic measure for the treatment of pancreatobiliary diseases in the elderly, but limited data on the use of ERCP in the super-aged elderly are available. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ERCP in patients 80 years of age or older. METHODS All therapeutic ERCPs performed from January 2012 to December 2015 at our endoscopy unit were retrospectively reviewed to evaluate the clinical outcomes and ERCP-related complications in patients 80 years of age or older (group A) and in patients younger than 65 years of age (group B). RESULTS A total of 141 patients (182 procedures) were 80 years of age or older (group A), and 513 patients (610 procedures) were 65 years old or younger (group B). Chronic concomitant diseases (73.05% vs. 31.19%, P<0.01) and the use of antithrombotic drugs (25.53% vs. 15.01%, P<0.01) were more frequent in group A than in group B. Common bile duct (CBD) stones were the most common indication for ERCP in both groups. The rate of a difficult cannulation was higher in group A than in group B (23.63% vs. 16.56%, P<0.01). The mean procedure time was longer, and second ERCPs were performed more frequently in group A than in group B. In addition, periampullary diverticulum was observed significantly more frequently in group A (30.22% vs. 20%, P<0.01) than in group B. The overall success rate (92.31% vs. 93.93%, P>0.05) and the complication rate (6.59% vs. 5.25%, P>0.05) were not significantly different between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS ERCP is a safe and effective intervention in patients 80 years of age or older, although elderly patients had a high rate of concomitant chronic diseases and used antithrombotic drugs more frequently.
Collapse
|
18
|
Stone AB, Brovman EY, Greenberg P, Urman RD. A medicolegal analysis of malpractice claims involving anesthesiologists in the gastrointestinal endoscopy suite (2007–2016). J Clin Anesth 2018; 48:15-20. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2018] [Revised: 04/13/2018] [Accepted: 04/15/2018] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
19
|
Lee JM, Min G, Lee JM, Kim SH, Choi HS, Kim ES, Keum B, Jeen YT, Chun HJ, Lee HS, Kim CD, Park JJ, Lee BJ, Choi SJ, Kim W. Efficacy and safety of etomidate-midazolam for screening colonoscopy in the elderly: A prospective double-blinded randomized controlled study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018; 97:e10635. [PMID: 29768328 PMCID: PMC5976307 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000010635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Recent studies have shown that etomidate is associated with fewer serious adverse events than propofol and has a noninferior sedative effect. We investigated whether etomidate-midazolam is associated with fewer cardiopulmonary adverse events and has noninferior efficacy compared to propofol-midazolam for screening colonoscopy in the elderly. METHODS A prospective, single-center, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial was performed. Patients aged over 65 years who were scheduled to undergo screening colonoscopy were randomized to receive either etomidate or propofol based on midazolam. The primary outcome was all cardiopulmonary adverse events. The secondary outcomes were vital sign fluctuation (VSF), adverse events disturbing the procedure, and sedation-related outcomes. RESULTS The incidence of cardiopulmonary adverse events was higher in the propofol group (72.6%) than in the etomidate group (54.8%) (P = .040). VSF was detected in 17 (27.4%) and 31 (50.0%) patients in the etomidate and propofol groups, respectively (P = .010). The incidence rate of adverse events disturbing the procedure was significantly higher in the etomidate group (25.8%) than in the propofol group (8.1%) (P = .008). Moreover, the incidence rate of myoclonus was significantly higher in the etomidate group (16.1%) than in the propofol group (1.6%) (P = .004). There was no statistical significance between the 2 groups with respect to sedation times and sedation-related outcomes including patients' and endoscopist's satisfaction. In the multivariate analysis, the etomidate group had significantly low odds ratio (OR) associated with VSF (OR: 0.407, confidence interval: 0.179-0.926, P = .032). CONCLUSIONS We recommend using etomidate-midazolam in patients with high ASA score or vulnerable to risk factors; propofol-midazolam may be used as a guideline in patients with low ASA score.
Collapse
|
20
|
Kumar A, Lin L, Bernheim O, Bagiella E, Jandorf L, Itzkowitz SH, Shah BJ. Effect of Functional Status on the Quality of Bowel Preparation in Elderly Patients Undergoing Screening and Surveillance Colonoscopy. Gut Liver 2017; 10:569-73. [PMID: 27021501 PMCID: PMC4933417 DOI: 10.5009/gnl15230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2015] [Revised: 09/01/2015] [Accepted: 10/05/2015] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background/Aims Optimal bowel preparation is essential for successful screening or for surveillance colonoscopy (SC). Inadequate bowel preparation is associated with older age, the male gender, and the presence of certain comorbidities. However, the association between patients’ functional status and bowel preparation quality has not been studied. We prospectively examined the relationship between functional status, namely, the ability to perform activities of daily living (ADLs) and ambulate, and the quality of bowel preparation in elderly patients undergoing SC. Methods Before undergoing SC, 88 elderly patients were surveyed regarding their functional status, specifically regarding their ability to perform ADLs and ambulate a quarter of a mile. Gastroenterologists then determined the quality of the bowel preparation, which was classified as either adequate or inadequate. Then, the frequency of inadequate bowel preparation in patients who did or did not experience difficulty performing ADLs and ambulating was calculated. Results Difficulty ambulating (unadjusted odds ratio [OR], 4.83; p<0.001), difficulty performing ADLs (OR, 2.93; p=0.001), and history of diabetes (OR, 2.88; p=0.007) were significant univariate predictors of inadequate bowel preparation. After adjusting for the above variables, only difficulty ambulating (adjusted OR, 5.78; p=0.004) was an independent predictor of inadequate bowel preparation. Conclusions Difficulty with ambulation is a strong predictor of inadequate bowel preparation in elderly patients undergoing SC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akash Kumar
- Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lisa Lin
- Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Oren Bernheim
- Dr. Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Emilia Bagiella
- Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lina Jandorf
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Steven H Itzkowitz
- Dr. Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Oncological Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Brijen J Shah
- Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.,Dr. Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.,Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Applegate RL, Lenart J, Malkin M, Meineke MN, Qoshlli S, Neumann M, Jacobson JP, Kruger A, Ching J, Hassanian M, Um M. Advanced Monitoring Is Associated with Fewer Alarm Events During Planned Moderate Procedure-Related Sedation: A 2-Part Pilot Trial. Anesth Analg 2016; 122:1070-8. [PMID: 26836134 PMCID: PMC4791313 DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000001160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Published ahead of print February 1, 2016 Diagnostic and interventional procedures are often facilitated by moderate procedure-related sedation. Many studies support the overall safety of this sedation; however, adverse cardiovascular and respiratory events are reported in up to 70% of these procedures, more frequently in very young, very old, or sicker patients. Monitoring with pulse oximetry may underreport hypoventilation during sedation, particularly if supplemental oxygen is provided. Capnometry may result in false alarms during sedation when patients mouth breathe or displace sampling devices. Advanced monitor use during sedation may allow event detection before complications develop. This 2-part pilot study used advanced monitors during planned moderate sedation to (1) determine incidences of desaturation, low respiratory rate, and deeper than intended sedation alarm events; and (2) determine whether advanced monitor use is associated with fewer alarm events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard L Applegate
- From the *Department of Anesthesiology, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, California; †Department of Anesthesiology, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, California; and ‡Department of Radiology, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, California
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Bechtold ML, Mir F, Puli SR, Nguyen DL. Optimizing bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a guide to enhance quality of visualization. Ann Gastroenterol 2016; 29:137-46. [PMID: 27065725 PMCID: PMC4805732 DOI: 10.20524/aog.2016.0005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2015] [Accepted: 01/11/2016] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Colonoscopy is an important screening and therapeutic modality for colorectal cancer. Unlike other screening tests, colonoscopy is dependent on pre-procedure bowel preparation. If the bowel preparation is poor, significant pathology may be missed. Many factors are known to improve bowel preparation. This review will highlight those factors that may optimize the bowel preparation, including choice of bowel preparation, grading or scoring of the bowel preparation, special factors that influence preparation, and diet prior to colonoscopy that affects bowel preparation. The aim of the review is to offer suggestions and guide endoscopists on how to optimize the bowel preparation for the patients undergoing colonoscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew L Bechtold
- Departments of Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia (Matthew L. Bechtold, Fazia Mir), USA
| | - Fazia Mir
- Departments of Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia (Matthew L. Bechtold, Fazia Mir), USA
| | - Srinivas R Puli
- Departments of Medicine, University of Illinois, Peoria (Srinivas R. Puli), USA
| | - Douglas L Nguyen
- Departments of Medicine, University of California, Irvine (Douglas L. Nguyen), USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Risks and Benefits of Colonoscopy in Patients 90 Years or Older, Compared With Younger Patients. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 14:80-6.e1. [PMID: 26164224 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.06.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2014] [Revised: 06/26/2015] [Accepted: 06/26/2015] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Although the numbers of medical procedures performed on extremely elderly patients (90 years or older, nonagenarians) are increasing, there are no data on the performance, diagnostic yield, or safety of colonoscopy for these patients. We compared the performance and safety of diagnostic colonoscopy, as well as lesions detected, in nonagenarians with patients who were 75 to 79 years old. METHODS In a retrospective study, we compared data from 76 extremely elderly patients (90 years or older) with data from 140 very elderly patients (75 to 79 years old, controls), all of whom underwent diagnostic colonoscopy from January 2010 through March 2013 at Virginia Mason Medical Center. All colonoscopies were performed by 15 endoscopists. We compared rates of colonoscopy completion, bowel preparation quality, diagnostic yield, and adverse events. RESULTS In extremely elderly patients, more colonoscopies were performed under general anesthesia, compared with controls (P < .001). When extremely elderly patients underwent colonoscopies with moderate sedation, lower doses of midazolam and fentanyl were given, compared with controls (P < .001). Colonoscopies were completed in a lower proportion of extremely elderly patients (88.2% vs. 99.3% for controls, P < .001), and these patients had a higher incidence of inadequate bowel preparation (29.7% vs. 15.0% for controls, P = .011). Colonoscopies were also associated with cardiopulmonary events in a higher proportion of extremely elderly patients (P = .006) as well as overall adverse events, compared with controls (P = .002). A higher proportion of extremely elderly patients were found to have advanced neoplasia (28.4% vs. 6.4% of controls, P < .001) as well as any neoplasia (P < .001 vs. controls). A greater percentage of extremely elderly patients also had large lesions (P = .002) and malignancies detected by histology (P < .001 vs. controls). Eleven extremely elderly patients (14.9%) were found to have cancer or high-grade dysplasia by colonoscopy. CONCLUSIONS In patients 90 years or older, diagnostic colonoscopy is associated with increased risk for incomplete procedure, inadequate bowel preparation, and adverse events. However, a large proportion of patients are found to have advanced neoplasia and cancer, compared with patients 75 to 79 years old.
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is common worldwide, and the elderly are disproportionately affected. Increasing age is a risk factor for the development of precancerous adenomas and colorectal cancer, thus raising the issue of screening and surveillance in older patients. Elderly patients are a diverse and heterogeneous group, and special considerations such as comorbid medical conditions, functional status and cognitive ability play a role in deciding on the utility of screening and surveillance. Colorectal cancer screening can be beneficial to patients, but at certain ages and under some circumstances the harm of screening outweighs the benefits. Increasing adverse events, poorer bowel preparation and more incomplete examinations are observed in older patients undergoing colonoscopy for diagnostic, screening and surveillance purposes. Decisions regarding screening, surveillance and treatment for colorectal cancer require a multidisciplinary approach that accounts not only for the patient’s age but also for their overall health, preferences and functional status. This review provides an update and examines the challenges surrounding colorectal cancer diagnosis, screening, and treatment in the elderly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukejohn W Day
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center CA, USA
| | - Fernando Velayos
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in elderly patients: is there still a difference? Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2015; 24:e118-22. [PMID: 24710237 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0b013e31829012f6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Although surgery is frequently not the first treatment option in elderly patients diagnosed with common bile duct stones (CBDS) because of the fear of high morbidity and mortality rates, there are few data about the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) in the elderly. METHODS From February 2004 to January 2012, 94 patients underwent LCBDE at our center. Data about sex, age, comorbidity, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, conversion to open surgery and bile duct clearance rate, postoperative complications, need for reoperation, and mortality were analyzed comparing patients of age 70 or older (group A, n=38) with patients aged under 70 (group B, n=56). RESULTS Elderly patients had significantly more preoperative risk factors. Stone extraction was equally successful in both groups (89.5% in group A vs. 96.4% in group B, P=0.176). Six patients developed medical complications (7.9% in group A vs. 5.4% in group B, P=0.621). Surgical morbidity was equivalent for both groups (13.2% in group A vs. 10.7% in group B, P=0.718). Four patients in each group experienced some grade of bile leakage. Three patients were reoperated (1 patient in group A because of a biliary peritonitis and 2 in group B after an intra-abdominal hemorrhage). There were no mortality cases directly related to surgery. CONCLUSIONS This study reveals that LCBDE is safe in the elderly patients and results are not different from those described in the general population. Patients with choledocholithiasis should be offered to undergo an LCBDE irrespective of their age at diagnosis.
Collapse
|
26
|
Pericleous S, Smith LI, Karim MA, Middleton N, Musbahi A, Ali A. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in Ayrshire, Scotland: a comparison of two age cohorts. Scott Med J 2015; 60:95-100. [PMID: 25784294 DOI: 10.1177/0036933015576695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS There is an increased trend in prevalence of pancreato-biliary disease in the elderly population. Consequently there is an increasing demand for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The aims of this study were to compare ERCP outcomes in patients over 80 with those aged between 60 and 79 years and with the published literature. METHODS AND RESULTS Data were collected from a prospectively maintained database. All patients over the age of 60 years who underwent ERCP from May 2010 to May 2012 were identified. Two cohorts were formed, group A: 60-79 years (n = 66) and group B: > 80 years old (n = 49). Data on indications for ERCP, outcome, complications and repeat procedures were collected. One hundred and fifteen patients between the age of 60 and 92 years were identified. Group A had a total of 89 ERCPs and group B 69. Cannulation, overall procedure success, complication and mortality rates were comparable between both groups. Group B contained two cases of perforation with one associated mortality (1.4%) which did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS ERCP in octogenarians is safe and effective when compared to patients aged 60-79.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Nicos Middleton
- Assistant Professor, Cyprus University of Technology, Cyprus
| | - Aya Musbahi
- FY1 Surgery, Department of General Surgery, University Hospital Ayr, UK
| | - Abdulmajid Ali
- Consultant Surgeon, Department of General Surgery, Univeristy Hospital Ayr, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Zhu H, Qin H, Li DM, Wang B, Zhang ZC, Zhao Q. Analgesic, sedative effects and safety of dezocine in patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi 2015; 23:1333-1337. [DOI: 10.11569/wcjd.v23.i8.1333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM: To evaluate the analgesic, sedative effects and safety of intramuscular dezocine in patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).
METHODS: From July 2013 to June 2014, 140 patients undergoing ERCP at our hospital were randomly divided into either a dezocine group (n = 70) or a demerol group (n = 70). Patients of the dezocine group were injected with 5 mg dezocine intramuscularly 30 min before ERCP, while the demerol group was given demerol 50 mg intramuscularly. The scores of visual analogue scale (VAS) intraoperatively or 30 min, 1, 2, 3, and 6 h postoperatively, Bruggrmann comfort scale (BCS) and Ramsay sedation score (RSS) at 30 min, 1, 2, and 3 h postoperatively were analyzed. The incidences of adverse reactions such as abdominal pain, abdominal distention, nausea, vomiting, headache, dizziness, and respiratory depression were recorded. We then evaluated the safety of dezocine and its analgesic and sedative effects in patients undergoing ERCP.
RESULTS: Both groups of patients successfully completed ERCP. Intraoperative VAS score in the dezocine group was significantly lower than that in the demerol group (P < 0.05). BCS scores in the dezocine group were significantly higher than those in demerol group at 30 min, 2 and 3 h postoperatively (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in RSS score between the two groups (P > 0.05). Administering either 5 mg dezocine or 50 mg demerol 30 min preoperatively had similar analgesic and sedative effects. The incidences of postoperative abdominal pain, abdominal distension, nausea and vomiting in the dezocine group were significantly lower than those in the demerol group (P < 0.05). No serious adverse reactions such as headache, dizziness or respiratory depression occurred in either group. The incidence of abdominal distension in the dezocine group was significantly lower than that in the demerol group (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Dezocine is safe and effective for analgesia and sedation in the procedure of ERCP, and it is superior to demerol clinically.
Collapse
|
28
|
Garcia M. Addressing overuse and overdiagnosis in colorectal cancer screening for average-risk individuals. COLORECTAL CANCER 2015. [DOI: 10.2217/crc.15.4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
SUMMARY Inappropriate screening harms healthy individuals and squanders precious resources. The purpose of this review is to address harms of colorectal cancer screening derived from overuse and overdiagnosis in average-risk individuals. Overuse is associated with shorter than recommended repeat screening and surveillance intervals, and screening in individuals who would not derive benefit because of advanced age or significant comorbidity. Overuse can unnecessarily increase patient harm from overdiagnosis or colonoscopy complications as well as gastroenterologist workload and healthcare costs. There is no evidence to suggest that overdiagnosis is an issue for colorectal cancer screening. However, targeting on cancer prevention (detection of adenomatous polyps) rather than early detection will lead to overdiagnosis as only a small minority of polyps develop into cancer.
Collapse
|
29
|
Prevalence of Precancerous Conditions and Gastric Cancer Based upon the National Cancer Screening Program in Korea for 7 Years, Single Center Experience. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2015; 2015:571965. [PMID: 25642244 PMCID: PMC4302356 DOI: 10.1155/2015/571965] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2014] [Accepted: 12/19/2014] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Aims. Gastric cancer is the second most prevalent cancer and the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths in Korea. The National Cancer Screening Program (NCSP) has implemented esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) biennially for all Koreans starting in their 40s. This study was conducted to estimate the clinical relevance of NCSP through identifying the prevalence of gastric disease, including cancer. Materials and Methods. Data from 40,821 subjects who received the screening EGD in the single center for 7 years were retrospectively investigated. Results. The overall prevalence of nonatrophic/atrophic/metaplastic gastritis, peptic ulcer, adenoma, early gastric cancer (EGC), and advanced gastric cancer (AGC) was 44.28%, 27.97%, 14.95%, 0.59%, 0.43%, 0.21%, and 0.09%, respectively. The prevalence of metaplastic gastritis, peptic ulcer, adenoma, EGC, and AGC was significantly higher in men than in women. The prevalence of preneoplastic/neoplastic disease significantly increased with age. Judged from the ratio of EGC to AGC, the proportion of EGC made up to 70% of all cancers. Conclusions. Screening endoscopy starting for people in their 40s should be strongly recommended for the elderly. Through the NCSP, the early detection of gastric cancer might contribute to the decreased mortality rate due to gastric cancer in Korea.
Collapse
|
30
|
Park TY, Choi JS, Oh HC, Kim JW, Do JH, Jung YH. Assessment of safety of non-anesthesiologist-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography based on performance status in elderly patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014; 29:1943-8. [PMID: 24730577 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.12608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/01/2014] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has been increasingly performed in the elderly patients, yet little is known concerning objective criteria of safety. This study aimed to determine the potential predictors for the procedure-related outcomes. METHODS Two hundred eighty-one patients older than 70 years who were indicated for ERCP (group A [n = 195], 70-79 years of age; group B [n = 86], ≥ 80 years of age) were prospectively enrolled and analyzed for the development of serious adverse events related to ERCP. RESULTS ERCP was not performed in six patients at high risk for the procedure. There were significant differences between group A and B in Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) (23.1 vs 14.9, P < 0.01) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (3 and 4, 49/195 vs 33/86, P < 0.05). Major ERCP-related complications (hypotension, severe bradycardia, hypoxia, myocardial infarction, cerebral infarction) occurred in five patients from group B and three from group A. Post-ERCP pancreatitis occurred in one patient from group A and bleeding in one from group B. In univariate analysis, old age (≥ 80 years), American Society of Anesthesiologists score ≥ 3, and DASI < 10 were statistically significant predictors for overall serious events related to ERCP. In the multivariate analysis, DASI < 10 (only manage to ambulate) was independent predictor for overall serious events related to ERCP. CONCLUSION DASI score is useful predictor for the feasibility assessment of safe ERCP in the elderly patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tae Young Park
- Division of Gastroenterology, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Johnson DA, Barkun AN, Cohen LB, Dominitz JA, Kaltenbach T, Martel M, Robertson DJ, Boland CR, Giardello FM, Lieberman DA, Levin TR, Rex DK. Optimizing adequacy of bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: recommendations from the US multi-society task force on colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 2014; 147:903-24. [PMID: 25239068 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 269] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alan N Barkun
- McGill University Health Center, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Larry B Cohen
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Jason A Dominitz
- VA Puget Sound Health Care System and University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Tonya Kaltenbach
- Veterans Affairs Palo Alto, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Myriam Martel
- McGill University Health Center, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Douglas J Robertson
- VA Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont; Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, White River Junction, Vermont
| | | | | | | | | | - Douglas K Rex
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Optimizing adequacy of bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: recommendations from the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2014; 109 Suppl 2:S39-59. [PMID: 25223578 DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2014.272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 95] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
33
|
Optimizing adequacy of bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: recommendations from the U.S. multi-society task force on colorectal cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 80:543-562. [PMID: 25220509 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 98] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|
34
|
Gómez V, Racho RG, Woodward TA, Wallace MB, Raimondo M, Bouras EP, Lukens FJ. Colonic endoscopic mucosal resection of large polyps: Is it safe in the very elderly? Dig Liver Dis 2014; 46:701-5. [PMID: 24731727 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2014.03.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2014] [Revised: 03/04/2014] [Accepted: 03/17/2014] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Outcomes on colon endoscopic mucosal resection in the very elderly patient population are unknown. AIMS Aims of this study were to evaluate the outcomes and safety of colon endoscopic mucosal resection in this target population. METHODS Observational, retrospective study of patients ≥ 80 years of age that underwent colon endoscopic mucosal resection ≥ 2 cm. Demographics, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, procedural data, and surgical treatment data were collected. RESULTS One-hundred-and-thirty-one colon endoscopic mucosal resections were performed on 99 patients ≥ 80 years of age with a mean age of 84. The majority of American Society of Anesthesiologists class was II. Mean lesion size was 3.3 cm (range, 2-12.5 cm), more procedures were performed in the right colon and adenoma/tubulovillous adenoma was the most common pathology. En bloc resection was performed on 26.7% of polyps (N=35). Eight procedure-related adverse events (8/131, 6.1%) occurred. No anaesthesia related adverse events or deaths occurred. Six patients required a colonic operation, and overall, 94% of the patient cohort evaded a colon operation. CONCLUSIONS Colon endoscopic mucosal resection in very elderly patients can be performed at experienced endoscopy centres with a low rate of complications and offers these patients a non-surgical option of management of colorectal lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria Gómez
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States.
| | - Ronald G Racho
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States
| | - Timothy A Woodward
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States
| | - Michael B Wallace
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States
| | - Massimo Raimondo
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States
| | - Ernest P Bouras
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States
| | - Frank J Lukens
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Abstract
Colonoscopy is a widely accepted method for the evaluation of the colon and terminal ileum. Its diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic safety are influenced by prerequisites, including modulation of medication and bowel cleansing. Appropriate choices of sedative medication and bowel-cleansing regimen, together with diet modification, should be made based on the patient's underlying disease, age, and medication intake. Moreover, effective methods for patient education regarding bowel preparation should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyong Hee Hong
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea
| | - Yun Jeong Lim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Colorectal cancer (CRC) disproportionately affects the elderly. Older age is a strong risk factor for both the development of precancerous adenomas and CRC, thus raising the issue of screening and surveillance in older patients. However, screening and surveillance decisions in the elderly can be complex and challenging. Elderly patients are a diverse and heterogeneous group and special considerations such as co-morbid medical conditions, functional status, and cognitive ability play a role in one's decisions regarding the utility of screening and surveillance. Such considerations also play a role in factors related to screening modalities, such as colonoscopy, as well as CRC treatment options and regimens. This review addresses many of the unique factors associated with CRC of the elderly and critically examines many of the controversies and challenges surrounding CRC in older patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukejohn W Day
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, 1001 Potrero Avenue, 3D-5, San Francisco, CA, 94110, USA,
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Razavi F, Gross S, Katz S. Endoscopy in the elderly: risks, benefits, and yield of common endoscopic procedures. Clin Geriatr Med 2014; 30:133-47. [PMID: 24267608 DOI: 10.1016/j.cger.2013.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
There has been limited research examining the risks, benefits, and use of common endoscopic procedures in the elderly. Furthermore, gastroenterology training programs do not routinely incorporate elderly concerns when dealing with common gastrointestinal issues. There exists a broad array of endoscopic procedures with varying inherent risks that must be weighed with each elderly patient in mind. This article discusses the benefits and drawbacks of the most common procedures and indications for endoscopy including upper endoscopy, colonoscopy, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, endoscopic ultrasound, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, and deep enteroscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Farid Razavi
- Division of Gastroenterology, Langone Medical Center, New York University, 550 1st Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Lim YJ, Hong SJ. What is the best strategy for successful bowel preparation under special conditions? World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20:2741-2745. [PMID: 24659865 PMCID: PMC3961988 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i11.2741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2013] [Revised: 10/18/2013] [Accepted: 11/05/2013] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Adequate bowel preparation is important for successful colonoscopic examination. Several effective colonic cleansing agents are available and routinely prescribed, but each carries its own limitations and benefits from particular dosing regimens. The most frequently prescribed colonic cleansing agent, the polyethylene glycol (PEG) cathartic solution, suffers from low patient compliance in general, due to its unpalatable taste and smell coupled with the large ingested volumes required. However, PEG is preferred over other cathartics for use in individuals of advanced age, sufferers of chronic kidney disease, heart failure and inflammatory bowel disease, and women who are pregnant or lactating. The laxative agents sodium phosphate (NaP) and sodium picosulfate plus magnesium citrate have been applied and have improved patient compliance and tolerance. NaP, however, should be avoided in individuals with impaired renal function or plasma clearance, such as those with chronic kidney disease, who are taking drugs that affect renal function, or who suffer from heart failure. Other special conditions that may affect an individual’s tolerance of the cathartic agent or ability to complete the administration routine include stroke, severe constipation, hematochezia, suspicious lower gastrointestinal bleeding, and mental disorders such as dementia. All ingestible bowel preparation solutions can be instilled into the stomach and duodenum through nasogastric tube or esophagogastroduodenoscope with the aid of a water irrigation pump for patients with difficulties swallowing or ingesting the large volumes of fluid required. In addition, dietary regimens based on clear liquids and low-residue foods for 1-4 d prior to the colonoscopy may be supplemental bowel preparation strategies. Achieving an effective and safe cleansing of the bowel is important for successful colonoscopy in all patients, so full knowledge of the individual’s condition and capabilities is necessary to select the most appropriate colonic cleansing agent and delivery regimen.
Collapse
|
39
|
Risk factors for early colonoscopic perforation include non-gastroenterologist endoscopists: a multivariable analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014; 12:85-92. [PMID: 23891916 PMCID: PMC4050305 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.06.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2013] [Revised: 06/03/2013] [Accepted: 06/17/2013] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Bowel perforation is a rare but serious complication of colonoscopy. Its prevalence is increasing with the rapidly growing volume of procedures performed. Although colonoscopies have been performed for decades, the risk factors for perforation are not completely understood. We investigated risk factors for perforation during colonoscopy by assessing variables that included sedation type and endoscopist specialty and level of training. METHODS We performed a retrospective multivariate analysis of risk factors for early perforation (occurring at any point during the colonoscopy but recognized during or immediately after the procedure) in adult patients by using the Clinical Outcomes Research Initiative National Endoscopic Database. Risk factors were determined from published articles. Additional variables assessed included endoscopist specialty and years of experience, trainee involvement, and sedation with propofol. RESULTS We identified 192 perforation events during 1,144,900 colonoscopies from 85 centers entered into the database from January 2000-March 2011. On multivariate analysis, increasing age, American Society of Anesthesia class, female sex, hospital setting, any therapy, and polyps >10 mm were significantly associated with increased risk of early perforation. Colonoscopies performed by surgeons and endoscopists of unknown specialty had higher rates of perforation than those performed by gastroenterologists (odds ratio, 2.00; 95% confidence interval, 1.30-3.08). Propofol sedation did not significantly affect risk for perforation. CONCLUSIONS In addition to previously established risk factors, non-gastroenterologist specialty was found to affect risk for perforations detected during or immediately after colonoscopy. This finding could result from differences in volume and style of endoscopy training. Further investigation into these observed associations is warranted.
Collapse
|
40
|
Abstract
Colorectal cancer and precancerous adenomas disproportionately affect the elderly, necessitating the need for screening and surveillance in this group. However, screening and surveillance decisions in the elderly can be challenging. Special considerations such as comorbid medical conditions, functional status, and cognitive ability play a role in one's decisions regarding the utility of screening and surveillance as well as the success and safety of various screening modalities. This article explores the evidence for screening and surveillance in the elderly, and addresses key challenges unique to this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukejohn W Day
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, 1001 Potrero Avenue, 3D-5, San Francisco, CA 94110, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Deep sedation without intubation for ERCP is appropriate in healthier, non-obese patients. Dig Dis Sci 2013; 58:3287-92. [PMID: 23877477 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-013-2783-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2013] [Accepted: 06/28/2013] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Providing the appropriate anesthesia for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) cases is challenging. AIM The aim of our study was to prospectively assess the safety of anesthesia directed deep sedation (ADDS) in non-intubated patients compared to general endotracheal anesthesia (GET) during an ERCP. METHODS We conducted a prospective observational study in patients undergoing an ERCP. The choice of anesthetic-ADDS or GET-was made by the anesthesiologist. The pre-anesthesia assessment, intraoperative vital signs, and medications administered were collected. A standardized study instrument was used to record the number of procedure interruptions, intraprocedure and recovery room adverse events (AE). RESULTS A total of 393 (89.7 %) patients received ADDS (no intubation) and 45 (10.2 %) received a GET. Age and comorbidities were similar in ADDS and GET groups. BMI was higher in the GET (32.6 ± 9.5) versus in the ADDS (27.3 ± 6.1) group; p < 0.001. The number of ASA 2 patients was higher in the ADDS versus the GET group (38.7 versus 22.2 %; p < 0.04); the number of ASA 4 patients was 15.6 % of GET versus 6.6 % of the ADDS cases (p = 0.05). During the procedure 16 (3.7 %) ADDS patients were intubated and converted to a GET anesthetic; 4 (25 %) of the converted ADDS cases were ASA 4 versus 6.4 % of ADDS patients (p = 0.006). Intraprocedure events occurred in 35.6 % of GET and 25.7 % of ADDS cases, without significant complications. CONCLUSION Our data suggest that the administration of anesthesia without intubation for prone ERCP cases is feasible especially in non-obese, healthier patients.
Collapse
|
42
|
Thiébaut-Georges B, Géhin M, Germain L, Maignan M, Ibba-Muller D, Di Patrizio P, de Korwin JD. L’exploration systématique par gastroscopie et coloscopie d’une anémie ferriprive chez le sujet de plus de 70ans ne diminue pas les décès et/ou la récidive de l’anémie. Étude prospective analytique. Rev Med Interne 2013. [DOI: 10.1016/j.revmed.2013.03.260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
43
|
Hamaker ME, Acampo T, Remijn JA, van Tuyl SA, Pronk A, van der Zaag ES, Paling HA, Smorenburg CH, de Rooij SE, van Munster BC. Diagnostic Choices and Clinical Outcomes in Octogenarians and Nonagenarians with Iron-Deficiency Anemia in the Netherlands. J Am Geriatr Soc 2013; 61:495-501. [DOI: 10.1111/jgs.12168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Marije E. Hamaker
- Department of Geriatric Medicine; Diakonessenhuis Utrecht/Zeist/Doorn; Utrecht the Netherlands
| | - Tessa Acampo
- Department of Geriatric Medicine; Gelre Hospitals; Apeldoorn the Netherlands
| | - Jasper A. Remijn
- Department of Clinical Chemistry and Hematology; Gelre Hospitals; Apeldoorn the Netherlands
| | | | - Apollo Pronk
- Department of Surgery; Diakonessenhuis; Utrecht The Netherlands
| | | | - Heleen A. Paling
- Department of Geriatric Medicine; Gelre Hospitals; Apeldoorn the Netherlands
| | | | - Sophia E. de Rooij
- Department of Internal Medicine; Academic Medical Center; Amsterdam the Netherlands
| | - Barbara C. van Munster
- Department of Geriatric Medicine; Gelre Hospitals; Apeldoorn the Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine; Academic Medical Center; Amsterdam the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Abstract
With increasing age, the incidence of both benign and malignant gastrointestinal (GI) disease rises. Endoscopic procedures are commonly performed in elderly and very elderly patients to diagnose and treat GI disorders. There are a number of issues to contemplate when considering performing an endoscopic procedure in an elderly patient, including the anticipated benefits of endoscopy as well as the increased risks associated with procedural sedation and some endoscopic procedures. This review will focus on the yield and safety of endoscopic procedures in older adults.
Collapse
|
45
|
Amornyotin S, Leelakusolvong S, Chalayonnawin W, Kongphlay S. Age-dependent safety analysis of propofol-based deep sedation for ERCP and EUS procedures at an endoscopy training center in a developing country. Clin Exp Gastroenterol 2012; 5:123-8. [PMID: 22826640 PMCID: PMC3401056 DOI: 10.2147/ceg.s31275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) procedures in elderly patients are on the rise, and they play an important role in the diagnosis and management of various gastrointestinal diseases. The use of deep sedation in these patients has been established as a safe and effective technique in Western countries; however, it is uncertain if the situation holds true among Asians. The present study aimed to evaluate the age-dependent safety analysis and clinical efficacy of propofol-based deep sedation (PBDS) for ERCP and EUS procedures in adult patients at a World Gastroenterology Organization (WGO) Endoscopy Training Center in Thailand. METHODS We undertook a retrospective review of anesthesia or sedation service records of patients who underwent ERCP and EUS procedures. All procedures were performed by staff endoscopists, and all sedations were administered by anesthesia personnel in the endoscopy room. RESULTS PBDS was provided for 491 ERCP and EUS procedures. Of these, 252 patients (mean age, 45.1 + 11.1 years, range 17-65 years) were in the <65 age group, 209 patients (mean age, 71.7 + 4.3 years, range 65-80 years) were in the 65-80 year-old group, and 30 patients (mean age, 84.6 + 4.2 years, range 81-97 years) were in the >80 age group. Common indications for the procedures were pancreatic tumor, cholelithiasis, and gastric tumor. Fentanyl, propofol, and midazolam were the most common sedative drugs used in all three groups. The mean doses of propofol and midazolam in the very old patients were relatively lower than in the other groups. The combination of propofol, midazolam, and fentanyl, as well as propofol and fentanyl, were frequently used in all patients. Sedation-related adverse events and procedure-related complications were not statistically significantly different among the three groups. Hypotension was the most common complication. CONCLUSION In the setting of the WGO Endoscopy Training Center in a developing country, PBDS for ERCP and EUS procedures in elderly patients by trained anesthesia personnel with appropriate monitoring is relatively safe and effective. Although adverse cardiovascular events, including hypotension, in this aged group is common, all adverse events were usually transient, mild, and easily treated, with no sequelae.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Somchai Amornyotin
- Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Siriraj GI Endoscopy Center, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Somchai Leelakusolvong
- Siriraj GI Endoscopy Center, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Correspondence: Somchai Amornyotin, Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand, Tel +66 2419 7990, Fax +66 2411 3256, Email
| | - Wiyada Chalayonnawin
- Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Siriraj GI Endoscopy Center, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Siriporn Kongphlay
- Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Siriraj GI Endoscopy Center, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Hudák J. [Digestive system endoscopy in the elderly and in patients with severe comorbidities]. Orv Hetil 2011; 152:2078-85. [PMID: 22155515 DOI: 10.1556/oh.2011.29242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Besides the technical equipment, the endoscopic team's theoretical and practical skills, the success of endoscopic intervention is influenced by the patient's general condition. Advanced age, severe co-morbidities may increase the risk, especially in case of operative endoscopy. The decision is more complicated when alarm symptoms urge the examination. The endoscopic examination of digestive system, biliary track and pancreas in advanced age can safely be performed as alternatives of surgical intervention. It is important to know the exact stage of cardiovascular and pulmonary diseases, besides, in case of stroke the patient's cooperation is very important. In everyday practice the most common problems are the endoscopic examination of the patient in oral anticoagulant and/or thrombocyte aggregation inhibition therapy and the question of suspending, modifying or restarting the therapy. Examining the patients with implanted electronic device as well as antibiotic prophylaxis in expanding range of indications are special issues. The gastroenterologist makes the decision based on the knowledge of the endoscopic intervention, the patient's risk classification, the indications, the contradictions and the alternative diagnostic possibilities. This review attempts to give an overview with some practical aspects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- János Hudák
- Városi Önkormányzat Kórháza Belgyógyászat-Gasztroenterológia Orosháza Könd u. 59. 5900.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Loffeld RJLF, Liberov B, Dekkers PEP. Yearly diagnostic yield of colonoscopy in patients age 80 years or older, with a special interest in colorectal cancer. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2011; 12:298-303. [PMID: 22050603 DOI: 10.1111/j.1447-0594.2011.00769.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
AIM A high diagnostic yield of colonoscopy has been reported in elderly patients, but there is no data on the yearly yield. Our aim was to detect the yearly yield of colonoscopy in elderly patients. METHODS All consecutive endoscopies in the years 1992-2009 were included. Important endoscopic diagnoses were defined as colorectal cancer (CRC), polyps, diverticuli and inflammation. RESULTS In total, 19 569 endoscopies were performed, of which 1706 (8.7%) were in patients age 80 years or older. The number of women was significantly higher (P < 0.001). The percentage of patients who were 80 years or older was higher than in the general population and remained stable during the study period, though there has been a proportional increase of elderly people in the general population. Inconclusive procedures were present in 106 (6.2%) elderly patients compared with 277 (1.6%) patients under 80 years of age (P < 0.001). There were no significant changes in the consecutive years. A procedure revealing no endoscopic diagnosis was observed less often in patients who were 80 years or older (P < 0.001). CRC was diagnosed in 221 (19.6%) older patients. This figure remained more or less constant each year. Polyps were seen in 448 (8.8%) patients 80 years of age or older. The percentage of patients with diverticuli and inflammation was constant. The number of patients 80 years or older with CRC and polyps rose at a lower rate than the number of older people in the general population. CONCLUSION The yield of colonoscopy in patients 80 years or older was high and constant over the years. The number of tumors rose less than expected compared to the increase of elderly in the general population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruud J L F Loffeld
- Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Zaans Medisch Centrum, Zaandam, The Netherlands.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Glomsaker T, Søreide K, Hoff G, Aabakken L, Søreide JA. Contemporary use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): a Norwegian prospective, multicenter study. Scand J Gastroenterol 2011; 46:1144-51. [PMID: 21692712 DOI: 10.3109/00365521.2011.594085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Novel imaging modalities have supplanted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for the diagnosis of hepatobiliary pancreatic diseases, but the use of ERCP as a diagnostic and therapeutic tool in current clinical practice is not well known. The main objective of this study was to describe and evaluate contemporary use of ERCP in Norway. MATERIAL AND METHODS Prospective and consecutive data were collected between January 2007 and December 2009 from voluntary institutional reports of ERCP activity at participating hospitals in the Gastronet database. RESULTS A total of 3840 procedures at 14 hospitals were registered during the study period. Data from 3809 procedures (53% females) were available for evaluation. Patients were ≥60 years of age in 2567 (67%) procedures. High co-morbidity (ASA score ≥3) was present in 32% of patients. The main indication for ERCP was evaluation and therapy of bile duct-related disorders. Successful bile duct cannulation was achieved in 93%. Pre-cut sphincterotomy was performed in 5% of procedures, and a guide wire to facilitate duct access was employed in 63%. Sphincterotomy, treatment for common bile duct stones (CBDS), and an insertion or change of bile duct stents were the most commonly employed procedures. Complications occurred in 10% of the patients, with a procedure-related mortality of 1%. CONCLUSIONS In Norway, ERCP is predominantly performed for CBDS and biliary strictures in elderly patients with associated co-morbidity. Patient selection, indications, and procedures are in concert with international guidelines and recommendations. Disease patterns in Norway differ slightly from those observed in central Europe and North America.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tom Glomsaker
- Department of Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|