Biliary tract cancer (BTC) remains among the most challenging malignancies with a poor prognosis and limited treatment options, particularly in pretreated patients. As most patients experience disease progression after first-line treatment, effective second-line and subsequent treatments are required. Although the addition of modified FOLFOX (fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin) to active symptom control improved the overall survival of patients with progressing advanced BTC despite gemcitabine plus cisplatin treatment, its efficacy was modest. Moreover, most clinical trials demonstrated modest efficacy of molecular-targeted agents for molecularly unselected pretreated advanced BTC. Patients with advanced BTC carry a relatively high druggable genetic alteration rate and have shown promising responses to molecular-matched therapies targeting gene alterations such as FGFR2 fusions/rearrangements, IDH1 mutation, and HER2 overexpression/amplification. Additionally, tumor-agnostic approaches, including BRAF V600E, NTRK fusion, and RET fusion, have expanded the treatment options for some patients. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown limited efficacy as mono- or combination therapy in patients with pretreated advanced BTC. Therefore, developmental efforts have shifted to immune checkpoint inhibitor and other combinations such as vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitors or radiation. In addition to refining combination strategies to enhance the therapeutic potential of immune checkpoint inhibitor, future research should focus on elucidating the tumor microenvironment. This review delineates the evolution of systemic therapies in patients with pretreated advanced BTC. By examining past developments and recent advances through prospective trials, it highlights novel approaches that may improve outcomes in this challenging disease.

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a serious public health issue due to its insidious onset and dismal prognosis. The past few years have witnessed and highlighted the development of understanding and management of CCA. The combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin (GP) chemotherapy regimen with immunotherapy using immune checkpoint inhibitors has been considered the new standard first-line treatment alternative for advanced CCA. Notably, the proportion of patients with advanced CCA with targetable genetic mutations is approximately 40 %, and these patients may be considered for molecularly targeted therapy in the second-line treatment. In this review, we highlight the advances and progress in targeted therapies for advanced CCA, with special attention to data from Asian populations, including Chinese. In addition, we present in detail the phosphatase tension homolog (PTEN), a novel biomarker for both of first-line chemotherapy and second-line targeted therapy in advanced CCA, and its ability to forecast prognosis in patients with CCA. The mechanisms of rapid resistance to targeted agents warrant further investigation and address in light of the development of new targeted therapies. Precision medicine is gradually playing an increasing role in achieving optimal therapeutic outcomes.

Liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) combined with fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) as a second-line treatment for biliary tract cancer (BTC) following progression on gemcitabine-based therapy in the Korean NIFTY and German NALIRICC trials yielded conflicting outcomes. This necessitated a comprehensive pooled analysis to evaluate its efficacy and safety.

Individual patient data were pooled from the intention-to-treat populations of the NIFTY and NALIRICC trials. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).

A total of 278 patients were included: 137 in the nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV group and 141 in the 5-FU/LV group. The nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV group showed significantly longer median PFS (3.6 months [95% confidence interval [CI], 2.7-4.4] vs 1.8 months (95% CI, 1.5-2.6), hazard ratio [HR) 0.65, p<0.001). Median overall survival was 8.1 months (95% CI, 6.0-8.9) and 6.1 months (95% CI, 5.3-7.5), respectively (HR 0.77, p=0.051). Overall response rates (ORR) was also higher in the nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV group (17.5% vs 2.8%; p<0.001) than in the 5-FU/LV group. Post-study irinotecan-containing therapy was administered in 4 (2.9%) and 21 (15.3%) patients in the nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV group and 5-FU/LV group, respectively. Adverse events varied by ethnicity, with gastrointestinal toxicities more common in Germans and neutropenia more prevalent in Koreans; treatment discontinuation without disease progression was 31.3% vs 8.0%, respectively.

The addition of nal-IRI to 5-FU/LV significantly improved PFS and ORR, supporting its potential as subsequent-line therapy. Differences in safety profiles underscore the relevance of ethnicity for nal-IRI in patients with BTC.

Current standard of care for second-line therapy in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) is FOLFOX. This study provides robust evidence supporting the potential role of additional liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) to fluorouracil and leucovorin (5-FU/LV) as a subsequent therapy for patients with BTC who have progressed on gemcitabine-based regimens. The findings demonstrate significant improvements in progression-free survival and overall response rates, emphasizing its potential to address the limited treatment options in this patient population. Furthermore, the study underscores the necessity of considering ethnic differences in adverse event profiles to optimize treatment administration and patient outcomes.

NCT03524508 and NCT03043547.

The Eastern Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference was an annual meeting that was held in St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, from 26 to 28 September 2024. This included experts in medical oncology, radiation oncology, surgical oncology, nuclear medicine, and general practitioners in oncology (GPO) from across the eastern Canadian provinces who are involved in the management of patients with gastrointestinal malignancies. This consensus statement generated by the conference addresses multiple topics, including the management of localized rectal cancer, liver-limited colorectal cancer, systemic therapy for advanced biliary tract cancers, radioligand therapy for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs), systemic therapy for pancreatic and midgut well-differentiated NETs, and systemic therapy for HER2-positive gastroesophageal cancers.

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a unifying title granted to epithelial adenocarcinomas specific to the bile ducts making up 10-25% of all hepatobiliary malignancies. CCA is more appropriately classified based on anatomic site of origin within the biliary tract into intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA), peri-hilar (pCCA) cholangiocarcinoma, and distal cholangiocarcinoma (dCCA). Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma makes up 10-20% of CCA and originates within and/or proximal to the second order bile ducts. The incidence of iCCA has been rising overtime with up to 1.26 per 100,000 persons, per year in the United States and up to 3.3 per 100, 000 persons, per year affected globally. Risk factors include chronic hepatic inflammation secondary to viral hepatitis, alcohol/NASH cirrhosis, biliary cystic lesions, and endemic causes, among other less common genetic drivers. Given its rarity, the recognition and diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma, iCCA specifically, remains challenging resulting in delays in treatment initiation or any treatment at all. Median overall survival (mOS) for iCCA remains low. Early diagnosis, and stage-based treatment approaches have evolved and are associated with improved survival. To this goal, a multi-disciplinary treatment approach has been demonstrated to improve patient outcomes by providing expert evaluation as it pertains to an accurate imaging and histologic diagnosis, staging, radiologic and surgical review for resectability, operative expertise, post operative care, as well as comprehensive knowledge and implementation of systemic/targeted or liver directed therapies. Here, we discuss the central role of imaging in the diagnosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma to implement a comprehensive treatment plan that frequently involves multiple disciplines to achieve the best outcome for each patient.

A clinical trial of nab-paclitaxel plus capecitabine as a first-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancers was conducted. We analyzed the development of systemic therapy recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines and the development of nab-paclitaxel combination chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract cancers (BTCs) and concluded that nab-paclitaxel plus capecitabine is a promising first-line regimen for advanced BTCs.

www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier is NCT06607302.

Biliary tract cancer (BTC) originates from the biliary epithelium of the small ducts within the liver (intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, IHCC), the main ducts of the hilum (extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, EHCC), or in the gallbladder (gallbladder cancer, GC). Due to presentation with nonspecific symptoms as well as absence of screening, most patients present with advanced disease and unfavorable prognosis.

The ABC-02 trial established the current first-line chemotherapy with gemcitabine/platinum for advanced BTC in 2010. Since then, multiple therapies have become available exploring different targetable alterations, emphasizing the importance of molecular profiling in all patients with BTC as well as understanding the distinct toxicity profile associated with these therapies. Besides chemotherapy, immunotherapy as well as targeted therapies for FGFR2, IDH1, and HER2 will be discussed in this manuscript. We performed a non-systematic review, largely based on high-quality articles on the topic of interest with no predefined protocol.

The primary objective of this manuscript is to conduct a thorough review of diverse aspects related to the safety of systemic treatment in BTC. As the benefit of these therapies depends on compliance and/or tolerance, the authors aim to discuss different toxicity profiles and to provide insights into strategies for overcoming them.

In recent years, treatment options for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) have increased significantly due to the positive results from phase 2/3 clinical trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors, combined with chemotherapy, and molecularly targeted agents. These advances have led to the need for molecular testing to identify actionable alterations and patients amenable to targeted therapies. However, these improvements have brought with them many questions and challenges, including the identification of resistance mechanisms and therapeutic sequences. In this Series paper we aim to provide an overview of the current systemic treatment options for patients with BTC, highlighting disparities in access to innovative treatments and molecular testing across European countries, which lead to inequalities in the possibilities of treating patients with advanced BTC. We also discuss how ongoing European collaborative projects, such as the COST Action Precision-BTC-Network CA22125, supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology), linked to the European Network for the Study of Cholangiocarcinoma (ENSCCA), can help overcome these disparities and improve the current scenario.

Biliary tract cancer (BTC), also known as cholangiocarcinoma, is a relatively rare type of cancer with a poor prognosis. Despite the combination of chemotherapy and advances in targeted therapy, which have potentially improved the prognosis of patients with BTC, research on outcomes remains inadequate. The present study thus analyzed the survival trends of patients with BTC. The present study used anonymized data from a public national database and focused on 13,600 individuals diagnosed with BTC between 2015 and 2020. The overall and 1-year mortality rates were analyzed according to cancer anatomic sites, along with the impact of comorbidities, such as diabetes and hepatitis on these rates. A total of 13,600 patients were included in the analysis; 26.31% of the patients had intrahepatic BTC, 27.46% had extrahepatic BTC and 46.24% had gallbladder (GB) cancer. For all BTC types, the 1-year survival hazard ratio (HR) in 2018 was 0.992 compared with that in 2015, and 0.986 in 2019. Compared with intrahepatic BTC, the 1-year survival rate was 0.349 for GB cancer and 0.641 for extrahepatic BTC. Patients with diabetes had an HR of 1.318 compared with those without diabetes. For patients with BTC previously diagnosed with GB stones, the survival HR was 0.902, compared to those without GB stones. On the whole, the analysis of national healthcare big data indicated an improvement in the overall prognosis of patients with BTC from 2018. Moreover, these data highlight that the prognosis of patients with BTC is influenced by the anatomical location of the cancer, and that co-existing medical conditions in patients affect the survival rate.

Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are a wide class of malignancies with dismal prognosis. The therapeutic scenario of metastatic BTCs has profoundly changed during recent years. The combination of cisplatin-gemcitabine plus immunotherapy is currently the gold standard in the first line. The more extensive comprehension of the mechanisms at the basis of BTCs and the identification of several molecular alterations has led to the introduction of target-directed therapies in the second line and beyond that have expanded the therapeutic armamentarium alongside the standard FOLFOX regimen, and for the near future, the results of some trials with targeted therapies in first line are expected. HER2 represents a promising therapeutic target detected in BTCs, being overexpressed in approximately 15-20% of cases, with a strong predilection for gallbladder carcinoma and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, although a small proportion of HER2 overexpression can be detected even in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. The efficacy and safety of different HER2 inhibitors have been investigated in several studies in the second line and beyond with encouraging results. This comprehensive review is intended to provide a summary of existing evidence and future perspectives on HER2 altered BTCs.

Gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) is an extremely aggressive tumor of the biliary tract with a bleak prognosis, and the evidence supporting the benefit of available systemic therapy for advanced GBC is scarce. Herein, this study intended to investigate the real-world outcome of chemotherapy combined with programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor for the management of unresectable or recurrent GBC.

From January 2018 to December 2023, consecutive patients who were treated with systematic treatment, including chemotherapy or the combination of chemotherapy plus PD-1 inhibitor, for unresectable or recurrent GBC were retrospectively identified. Clinical data regarding baseline characteristics, therapeutic response, adverse events (AEs), and oncological outcomes were collected.

The eligible patients were allocated to combination therapy arm (n = 46) and mono-chemotherapy arm (n = 19). After propensity score matching (PSM), 16 patients were allocated in each arm. The overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of combination therapy were marginally superior to mono-chemotherapy both before and after PSM. The combination therapy exhibited advantage over mono-chemotherapy in regards to partial response (PR) (before PSM: P = 0.009; after PSM: P = 0.037) and objective response rate (ORR) (before PSM: P = 0.006; after PSM: P = 0.015). In combined therapy cohort, 1 patient achieve a complete response, and 13 patients were assessed as appropriate for surgical excision, among which 1 patient refused further surgical intervention.

In patients with unresectable or recurrent GBC, the combination of chemotherapy and PD-1 inhibitor as first-line therapy exhibited prolonged OS and PFS, and increased PR and ORR over those receiving chemotherapy alone, with an acceptable toxicity profile. The combination therapy may be a potential conversion therapy in unresectable GBC patients.

Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A/2B (CDKN2A/2B) deletions are frequently identified in patients with biliary tract cancer; however, standard treatment options for this genetic alteration are lacking. Here, we present the case of a 64-year-old woman diagnosed with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and hilar lymph node metastasis who underwent radical surgery. Postoperative pathology confirmed moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma. The tumor recurred during the second cycle of adjuvant chemotherapy following surgery, and the metastatic sites included the cranial region, right lung, and right adrenal gland. Genetic analysis revealed a CDKN2A/2B deletion, indicating palbociclib sensitivity. Subsequently, the patient received palbociclib plus lenvatinib as systemic therapy, along with stereotactic radiotherapy for the intracranial lesion. Notably, the right pulmonary metastasis significantly regressed after 12 months of treatment, with the complete disappearance of the intracranial tumor. However, the disease progressed at 32.2 months, with significant enlargement of the right adrenal gland metastasis and new metastasis in the right lung. The progression-free survival and overall survival were 32.2 months and 34.4 months, respectively. In conclusion, our case demonstrates that palbociclib plus lenvatinib is a promising chemotherapy-free second-line treatment for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with a CDKN2A/2B deletion.

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) presents in two clinically distinct subtypes: large duct (LD-iCCA) and small duct (SD-iCCA). These subtypes exhibit significant molecular, genetic, and histopathological differences that impact patient prognosis and treatment responsiveness. This review advocates for a subtype-specific approach to iCCA research and clinical management, including tailored therapeutic strategies that consider distinct genetic profiles and tumor microenvironments. Current therapeutic approaches hold promise, yet efficacy varies by subtype. Additionally, subtype-specific molecular diagnostics, including DNA methylation-based classifiers and transcriptomic sequencing, have shown potential in refining iCCA subclassification, thereby guiding precision medicine efforts. This article outlines existing clinical trials, key research trajectories, and future directions for developing more effective subtype-adapted therapies for iCCA.

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a diverse group of epithelial malignant tumors arising from the biliary tract, characterized by high molecular heterogeneity. It is classified into intrahepatic (iCCA) and extrahepatic CCA (eCCA) based on the location of the primary tumor. CCA accounts for approximately 15% of all primary liver cancers, with iCCA comprising 10-20% of all CCAs. iCCA is especially known for its characteristic aggressiveness and refractoriness, leading to poor prognosis. Despite the increasing global incidence and mortality rates, surgery remains the only available standard treatment approach for a subset (25%) of patients with early-stage, resectable iCCA. The paucity of effective systemic medical therapies restricts therapeutic options for patients with advanced or metastatic iCCA. In the past decade, advances in the understanding of the molecular complexity of these tumors have provided fruitful insights for the identification of promising new druggable targets and the development of feasible therapeutic strategies that may improve treatment outcomes for patients with iCCA. In this review, we aim to highlight critical up-to-date studies and medicinal chemistry aspects, focusing on novel targeted approaches utilizing promising candidates for molecular targeted therapy in iCCA. These candidates include aberrations in isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) 1/2, fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR), B-Raf proto-oncogene (BRAF), neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1). Furthermore, this review provides an overview of potential inhibitors aimed at overcoming acquired drug resistance in these actionable targets for iCCA.

Biliary tract cancer, carcinoma of the extrahepatic bile ducts, carcinoma of the gallbladder, ampullary carcinoma, and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma are often identified at advanced stages. The standard therapy for advanced biliary tract cancer has been a combination of cytotoxic agents. Globally, gemcitabine plus cisplatin has been the standard first-line regimen, whereas gemcitabine plus cisplatin plus S-1 and gemcitabine plus S-1 have also been the standard regimens in Japan. Recently, treatment strategies have been updated. As first-line systemic therapy, the addition of an immune checkpoint inhibitor, such as durvalumab or pembrolizumab, to gemcitabine plus cisplatin has been shown to prolong overall survival compared with gemcitabine plus cisplatin. These combined immunotherapies are widely used in clinical practice as internationally standard first-line regimens. Regarding second-line treatment after a gemcitabine-based regimen, fluorouracil and folinic acid plus oxaliplatin have been the standard regimen. Additionally, FGFR2 fusion gene/rearrangement, mutations of IDH1/2, KRAS, and BRAF, and overexpression of HER2 are promising therapeutic targets for which the effectiveness of each targeted therapy has been reported, at this time, as a second-line or later treatment.

Objectives: Although systemic chemotherapy (SC) is the mainstay for treating unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), its efficacy is limited and it causes severe systemic side effects. This study focuses on evaluating the effectiveness and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) in combination with lenvatinib plus programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors (HLP), compared to SC in combination with lenvatinib plus PD-1 inhibitors (SCLP) for unresectable ICC. Methods: We analyzed patients initially diagnosed with unresectable ICC at our center between March 2021 and December 2023, classifying them into HLP and SCLP groups according to treatment regimen. This study assessed and compared overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), tumor response, and safety outcomes across the two treatment groups. Results: This study enrolled 53 subjects in total; 25 were treated with HLP and 28 with SCLP. The two groups showed well-matched baseline characteristics. The HLP group reported an extended median OS (12.8 vs. 11.0 months, p = 0.310) and a prolonged median PFS (8.8 vs. 6.4 months, p = 0.043), compared to the SCLP group. The HLP group had a better objective response rate (ORR) (52% vs. 25%, p = 0.043) and disease control rate (DCR) (96% vs. 78.6%, p = 0.104). Based on OS (p = 0.019) and PFS (p = 0.032) results, those without extrahepatic metastasis seemed to benefit more significantly from the HLP regimen than from the SCLP regimen. The HLP group experienced fewer grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) than the SCLP group. Conclusions: The HLP regimen for unresectable ICC is an effective and safe strategy and is potentially better suited for patients without extrahepatic metastases.

This was the first phase 1 study conducted in the United States. It consisted of dose-escalation (part A) and multiple indication-specific cohort expansion (part B), investigating the safety and preliminary efficacy of toripalimab (anti-programmed cell death-1 inhibitor) in patients with advanced malignancies.

Patients with advanced malignancies that progressed after treatment with at least one prior line of standard systemic therapy, including the patients with advanced/recurrent cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), received toripalimab 240 mg every 3 weeks in part B. The primary endpoint was safety assessment. Efficacy endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS) as assessed by the investigators according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (version 1.1) and overall survival (OS).

In part B, 166 patients, including the 42 patients with CCA, were enrolled and received toripalimab. Among the 166 patients, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of any grade occurred in 158 (95.2%) patients, and 97 (58.4%) patients experienced TEAEs of Grade 3 or greater. The most common TEAE was fatigue (42.2%). Seven (4.2%) patients experienced TEAEs with a fatal outcome, none of which were identified by investigators as related to toripalimab. Investigator-assessed immune-related adverse events (irAE) of Grade 3 or higher occurred in 7 (4.2%) patients. In the CCA cohort, with the median follow-up of 4.4 months, the ORR and DCR were 4.8% (95% CI: 0.58, 16.16) and 40.5% (95% CI: 25.63, 56.72), respectively; median DoR was 7.8 (range 4.4+ to 7.8) months; median PFS was 2.1 (95% CI: 1.91, 3.88) months; median OS was not estimable.

Toripalimab had manageable side effects in patients with refractory cholangiocarcinoma and exhibited preliminary evidence of anti-tumor activity. However, further information regarding biomarkers is needed. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03474640.

Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) is a promising option for liver-only unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA). The Real-SIRTCCA study retrospectively assessed the benefit of adding SIRT to chemotherapy in this setting within the French nationwide observational cohort ACABi-GERCOR-PRONOBIL.

Inclusion criteria were advanced iCCA with limited or no extrahepatic disease, treated with first-line gemcitabine plus platinum chemotherapy +/- concurrent SIRT. All patients treated with chemotherapy and concurrent SIRT were included. To ensure groups' similarity, a rigorous selection was applied to the chemo-only group, with exclusion of patients with liver involvement >50% and extrahepatic metastases. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) and tumor resection rate. Propensity score and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) propensity approaches were used to address confounding factors between groups.

Between July 2007 and December 2023, 277 patients met the Real-SIRTCCA inclusion criteria, with 88 in the chemo-SIRT group and 189 in chemo-only group. Chemo-SIRT was associated with longer PFS (median = 10.8 vs. 5.5 months, hazard ratio [HR] 0.54, 95% CI 0.41-0.71, p <0.0001), a trend for longer OS (median = 22.5 vs. 15.1 months, HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.57-1.01), higher ORR (58.3% vs. 28.5%, odds ratio [OR] 3.51, 95% CI 2.03-6.09, p <0.0001), and resection rate (18.7% vs. 8.8%, p = 0.0279) compared to chemo-alone. After IPTW, the superiority of chemo-SIRT was confirmed with better PFS (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.45-0.66, p <0,0001), OS (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.58-0.85, p = 0.0004), ORR (OR 3.17, 95% CI 2.18-4.49, p <0.0001) and resection rate (OR 2.94, 95% CI 1.71-5.03, p <0.0001).

Adding SIRT to first-line chemotherapy significantly improved survival outcomes, ORR, and secondary tumor resection rates in locally advanced iCCA. Prospective randomized data are needed to confirm these results.

Herein, we report the results of the Real-SIRTCCA study, comparing the efficacy of the gemcitabine-platinum systemic first-line chemotherapy with or without selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) in 277 patients with locally advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma within the cohort ACABi-PRONOBIL. An improvement of progression-free survival, overall survival, tumor response and secondary surgical resection rate was observed in favor of chemo-SIRT, before adjustment and after inverse probability of treatment weighting propensity score analyses. Even though prospective randomized data would be needed to confirm these findings, we believe that this study constitutes new evidence of the potential benefit of combining SIRT with chemotherapy. The safety and efficacy of this strategy whether as a bridge to intent-to-cure strategies or in a palliative setting, should encourage its adoption in a larger panel of clinical centers, or at very least, prompt clinicians to refer their patients to centers where SIRT is performed.

NCT04935853.

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is an aggressive malignancy with rising incidence and poor outcomes. This review examines recent advancements in locoregional therapies for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, focusing on external beam radiotherapy, transarterial radioembolization (TARE), hepatic artery infusion pump (HAIP) chemotherapy, and liver transplantation. Stereotactic body radiation therapy and proton beam therapy have shown promise in achieving local control and improving survival. TARE, with personalized dosimetry, has demonstrated encouraging results in select patient populations. HAIP chemotherapy, primarily studied using floxuridine, has yielded impressive survival outcomes in phase II trials. Liver transplantation, once contraindicated, is now being reconsidered for carefully selected patients with localized disease. While these locoregional approaches show potential, randomized controlled trials comparing them to standard systemic therapy are lacking. Patient selection remains crucial, with factors such as liver function, tumor burden, and molecular profile influencing treatment decisions. Ongoing research aims to optimize treatment sequencing, explore combination strategies with systemic therapies, and refine phenotype identification and patient selection criteria. As the landscape of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma management evolves, a multidisciplinary approach is essential to tailor treatment strategies and improve outcomes for patients with this challenging disease.

Background: Biliary tract cancers (BTCs), including gallbladder and bile duct cancers, have a poor prognosis. Recent advances in chemotherapy, such as using targeted drugs for specific gene mutations, have improved outcomes. Gemcitabine plus cisplatin chemotherapy has been the standard of care for the primary treatment of BTCs, but secondary treatment had not been established until recently. In recent years, durvalumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin (GCD) chemotherapy is emerging as a promising regimen, although more evidence is needed for its effectiveness. Methods: This retrospective single-center study involved 44 patients receiving GCD treatment between January 2023 and March 2024 with a median follow-up of 10 months. Outcomes focused on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), response rates, and adverse events (AEs). Results: The overall response rate (ORR) was 23%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 82%. The overall median OS and PFS were 15.3 and 8.0 months, respectively, with patients receiving primary chemotherapy experiencing longer survival compared to a control group. Patients who did not undergo bile duct drainage had statistically different better OS and PFS. Grade 3 or higher AEs occurred in 54.5% of patients, with neutropenia and biliary infections being common. Conclusions: GCD chemotherapy shows potential as an effective treatment for BTCs. The favorable treatment outcome was the response rate, particularly in primary therapy or those cases with no metastasis. Bile duct management is crucial for improving patient outcomes. GCD chemotherapy has a high response rate, PFS, and OS compared to other forms of chemotherapy.

Mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) genes are among the most frequently encountered molecular alterations in cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). These neomorphic point mutations endow mutant IDH (mIDH) with the ability to generate an R-enantiomer of 2-hydroxyglutarate (R2HG), a metabolite that drives malignant transformation through aberrant epigenetic signaling. As a result, pharmacologic inhibition of mIDH has become an attractive therapeutic strategy in CCAs harboring this mutation. One such inhibitor, ivosidenib, has already undergone clinical validation and received FDA approval in this disease, but there is still much work to be done to improve outcomes in mIDH CCA patients. In this publication we will review the pathogenesis and treatment of mIDH CCA with special emphasis on novel agents and combinations currently under investigation.

Cancers of the digestive system are major contributors to global cancer-associated morbidity and mortality, accounting for 35% of annual cases of cancer deaths. The etiologies, molecular features, and therapeutic management of these cancer entities are highly heterogeneous and complex. Over the last decade, genomic and functional studies have provided unprecedented insights into the biology of digestive cancers, identifying genetic drivers of tumor progression and key interaction points of tumor cells with the immune system. This knowledge is continuously translated into novel treatment concepts and targets, which are dynamically reshaping the therapeutic landscape of these tumors. In this review, we provide a concise overview of the etiology and molecular pathology of the six most common cancers of the digestive system, including esophageal, gastric, biliary tract, pancreatic, hepatocellular, and colorectal cancers. We comprehensively describe the current stage-dependent pharmacological management of these malignancies, including chemo-, targeted, and immunotherapy. For each cancer entity, we provide an overview of recent therapeutic advancements and research progress. Finally, we describe how novel insights into tumor heterogeneity and immune evasion deepen our understanding of therapy resistance and provide an outlook on innovative therapeutic strategies that will shape the future management of digestive cancers, including CAR-T cell therapy, novel antibody-drug conjugates and targeted therapies.

Cuproptosis is a unique form of cell death that is dependent on copper, which is fundamentally different from other recognized forms of cell death. However, the molecular and immune characteristics in cuproptosis-defined subgroups of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) remain to be further illustrated.

We conducted a comprehensive investigation into the genetic and transcriptional variation, prognostic significance, and expression profiles of 16 cuproptosis-related genes (CRGs). To construct a prognostic signature based on differentially expressed genes between molecular subtypes, we employed LASSO and multivariate Cox regression analyses. We then assessed the values of this signature in prognostic prediction, immune infiltration, and therapeutic responses in CCA. The robustness of the signature was further validated in the GEO and IMvigor210 cohorts. Additionally, qRT-PCR and Western blotting (WB) were utilized to confirm the expression of the signature genes across different cell lines.

A total of 16 CRGs were analyzed revealed differentially expressed, and two CRG-related clusters were identified, which displayed contrasting survival times.Then, a robust cuproptosis-related risk model was established and was an independent prognostic factor for CCA, which was further validated across two external cohorts. Low-risk patients had a better overall survival than high-risk patients. The comprehensive results showed that a low-risk score was correlated with metabolism-related pathways, high infiltration of CD8 T cells, B cells, and M1 macrophages, active immunity and less aggressive phenotypes, high chemotherapeutic sensitivity, and more benefit from immunotherapy. In contrast, a high-risk score was associated with cancer and metastasis-related pathways, high infiltration of M2 macrophages, high expression of immune checkpoint genes, suppressive immunity and more aggressive phenotypes, and less benefit from chemotherapeutic and immunotherapy. In addition, the critical CRGs were further validated through qRT-PCR and WB.

We developed a novel risk model for CCA patients, which serves as a promising biomarker for distinguishing prognosis as well as molecular and immune characteristics.

The current state of systemic therapy for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) has undergone significant changes. Currently, there are no clinical trials directly comparing various first-line systemic therapy regimens to each other, and these trials are unlikely to be conducted in the future. In this systematic review, after various abstracts and full-text articles published from the establishment of the database until October 2024 were searched, we included and analysed phase 3 clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy of different first-line systemic treatment regimens in advanced BTC. We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines and a random effects model to pool the overall effects. Finally, seven low-risk-of-bias trials (with all of the trials representing first-line trials) were included. A total of 4033 patients were included in seven first-line trials. In terms of progression-free survival (PFS), network meta-analysis revealed that durvalumab + gemcitabine + cisplatin (GemCis) triple therapy, S-1 + GemCis triple therapy, and pembrolizumab + GemCis triple therapy were superior to GemCis. In terms of overall survival (OS), network meta-analysis revealed that durvalumab + GemCis triple therapy and pembrolizumab + GemCis triple therapy outperformed GemCis. According to the ranking of the P scores, durvalumab + GemCis triple therapy ranked first in PFS and second in OS. Therefore, the advantages of molecular immunotherapy have gradually become known, which suggests that future trials should focus on other potential combinations and molecular immunotargeted therapies.

Biliary tract tumors (BTC) account for about 3% of all digestive system tumors, with rising incidence and limited treatment options, particularly for advanced stages, underscoring the need for innovative therapies. This retrospective cohort study evaluated the safety and efficacy of a novel regimen combining hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX-HAIC) alongside lenvatinib and programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitors (mFOLFOX-HAIC+lenvatinib+PD-1i) compared to standard regimens of gemcitabine plus cisplatin, gemcitabine plus S1, or gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin (GC/GS/GEMOX) in advanced BTC patients treated from March 2019 to November 2023. A total of 89 patients were analyzed, with 55 receiving hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy and 34 receiving the GC/GS/GEMOX regimens. Among these, 23 patients were in the mFOLFOX-HAIC+lenvatinib+PD-1i group, while 24 were in the GC/GS/GEMOX group. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) for the mFOLFOX-HAIC+lenvatinib+PD-1i group was 15 months compared to 6 months for the GC/GS/GEMOX group. Similarly, the median overall survival (mOS) was 20 months for the mFOLFOXHAIC+lenvatinib+PD-1i group versus 13 months for the GC/GS/GEMOX group. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) for the mFOLFOX-HAIC+lenvatinib+PD-1i group were 48.5% and 87.0%, respectively, both significantly higher than those observed in the GC/GS/GEMOX group at three months of treatment. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) was similar between the mFOLFOX-HAIC+lenvatinib+PD-1i group and the GC/GS/GEMOX group, at 86.5% and 84.2%, respectively, with no statistically significant difference in complication rates. Overall, mFOLFOX-HAIC+lenvatinib+PD-1i appears to be a safe and well-tolerated treatment for advanced BTC, demonstrating superior mPFS and mOS compared to standard regimens.

JCOG1113 is a randomized phase III trial that showed non-inferiority of gemcitabine plus S-1 to gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer. Assessment of inter-institutional heterogeneity in chemotherapy contributes to confirm generalizability and reliability of the study itself. However, there have been no studies conducted to assess the heterogeneity among participating centers in randomized phase III trials for biliary tract cancer.

The objective of this post-hoc analysis was to assess the inter-institutional heterogeneity in the overall survival and progression-free survival of patients with advanced biliary tract cancer treated with first-line chemotherapy in the JCOG1113 trial. The heterogeneity in the overall survival and progression-free survival was assessed according to three factors: hospital volume, experience in medical oncology and experience in biliary intervention. A total of 300 advanced biliary tract cancer patients were analyzed. There were no statistically significant trends observed between hospital volume, experience in medical oncology, or experience in biliary intervention and overall survival (hospital volume: adjusted trend P value = 0.6796; experience in medical oncology: adjusted trend P value = 0.4092; experience in biliary intervention: adjusted trend P value = 0.6112). Similarly, no statistically significant trends were observed between these factors and progression-free survival (hospital volume: adjusted trend P value = 0.3000; experience in medical oncology: adjusted trend P value = 0.1108; experience in biliary intervention: adjusted trend P value = 0.2898).

This study revealed no inter-institutional heterogeneity in the overall survival and progression-free survival in the JCOG1113 study population of advanced biliary tract cancer patients.

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is a malignant liver tumor with a rising global incidence and poor prognosis, largely due to late-stage diagnosis and limited effective treatment options. Standard chemotherapy regimens, including cisplatin and gemcitabine, often fail because of the development of multidrug resistance (MDR), leaving patients with few alternative therapies. Doxycycline, a tetracycline antibiotic, has demonstrated antitumor effects across various cancers, influencing cancer cell viability, apoptosis, and stemness. Based on these properties, we investigated the potential of doxycycline to overcome gemcitabine resistance in iCCA.

We evaluated the efficacy of doxycycline in two MDR iCCA cell lines, MT-CHC01R1.5 and 82.3, assessing cell cycle perturbation, apoptosis induction, and stem cell compartment impairment. We assessed the in vivo efficacy of combining doxycycline and gemcitabine in mouse xenograft models.

Treatment with doxycycline in both cell lines resulted in a significant reduction in cell viability (IC50 ~15 µg/mL) and induction of apoptosis. Doxycycline also diminished the cancer stem cell population, as indicated by reduced cholangiosphere formation. In vivo studies showed that while neither doxycycline nor gemcitabine alone significantly reduced tumor growth, their combination led to marked decreases in tumor volume and weight at the study endpoint. Additionally, metabolic analysis revealed that doxycycline reduced glucose uptake in tumors, both as a monotherapy and more effectively in combination with gemcitabine.

These findings suggest that doxycycline, especially in combination with gemcitabine, can restore chemotherapy sensitivity in MDR iCCA, providing a promising new strategy for improving outcomes in this challenging disease.

To compare overall survival (OS), toxicity, and quality of life (QOL) in patients with metastatic gallbladder cancer receiving oral capecitabine (X) with best supportive care (BSC) and BSC alone.

Patients with metastatic gallbladder cancer and Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) ≥70 were accrued and assigned to either arm A or B. Assignment to these two arms was based on physician/patient discretion. Arm A received oral capecitabine 825 mg/m2 twice a day d1-14, repeated every 3 weeks for six cycles with BSC, and arm B received BSC alone. The Kaplan-Meier method computed OS and comparison was using a log-rank test. QOL was measured using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 administered at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. The linear mixed-effects model was used for the longitudinal analysis of QOL.

Between December 2020 and April 2022, 64 patients diagnosed with metastatic gallbladder carcinoma and KPS ≥70 were accrued in the study, and 32 patients were assigned to each arm. In arm A versus B, the median age was 52 versus 55 (P = .21); the median KPS was 80 versus 70 (P = .008). The median OS in arm A versus B was 3.4 versus 2 months (P = .001). Grade 1-2 vomiting and diarrhea were seen in 50% versus 78% (P = .041) and 59% versus 9.3% (P = .01) patients in arm A versus B, respectively. Grade 1-2 hand-foot syndrome was seen in 12 (37.5%) patients in arm A. Dynamic changes showed an improvement in pain in the linear mixed model with a significant difference between the arms (P = .011); arm A experienced a significant improvement in pain over time (arm × time P = .020). Global QOL improved over time (P = .038) with parallel improvement between arms (arm × time P = .490).

Compared with BSC alone, patients who receive X + BSC experience an OS improvement of 1.4 months and better pain control without grade 3 toxicities or negative impact on QOL.