The optimal time to chemotherapy (TTC) in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NLAGC) remains unclear.

Consecutive 524 patients with NLAGC between Jan. 2010 and Dec. 2022 were identified. Patients were categorized into three groups: TTC < 6w, 6w ≤ TTC ≤ 8w, and TTC > 8w. Survival analysis was conducted using the Cox proportional hazards model to assess the impact of TTC on gastric cancer-specific mortality (GCSM) and all-cause mortality (ACM). Cumulative competing risk curves were employed to evaluate the incidence of competing events.

Overall, 451 patients were included.Cumulative competing risk curves showed that the 3-year ACM and GCSM were significantly lower in the 6w ≤ TTC ≤ 8w group (ACM: 19.7% vs. 37.2% vs. 39.7%, GCSM: 19.7% vs. 35.2% vs. 38.8%) compared to the TTC < 6w and TTC > 8w groups. Compared to patients with 6w ≤ TTC ≤ 8w, those with TTC < 6w or >8w had an increased risk of GCSM (HR: 2.792 and HR: 2.343, respectively) and ACM (HR: 3.102 and HR: 2.719, respectively) after adjusting for confounders. Furthermore, 6w ≤ TTC ≤ 8w had later peak recurrence compared to TTC < 6w and TTC > 8w (Peak months: 9.7 vs. 4.3 vs. 3.1).

A postoperative chemotherapy timing of 6-8 weeks was associated with better survival and delayed recurrence in NLAGC patients. These findings suggest that the 6-8 week time-window should be a key timeframe for personalized postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy decisions.

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a promising biomarker for predicting minimal residual disease (MRD) and guiding treatment decisions in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). This study aimed to examine the study designs and settings of ongoing clinical trials that use ctDNA to guide treatment decisions and to determine the best timing for detecting MRD in non-metastatic CRC. We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov for English language records. The ctDNA settings from the clinical trials were categorized by randomization to ctDNA testing, treatment options based on ctDNA results, and the timing of ctDNA testing relative to adjuvant therapy. For prospective studies, a network meta-analysis using a frequentist approach was conducted to examine the pairwise associations between different ctDNA timing strategies and MRD, defined as recurrence, relapse, and progression. The main approaches in ctDNA-based interventional trial designs were categorized as ctDNA-guided treatment, ctDNA-by-treatment, ctDNA-guided surveillance, and ctDNA-enriched adjuvant therapy for guiding treatment decisions, including both escalation and de-escalation strategies, and surveillance. Overall, both preoperative and postoperative ctDNA detection were linked to higher risks of progression, with pooled hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) of 5.23 (2.10-13.00) and 7.95 (5.30-11.91), respectively. Among the timing strategies, ctDNA testing after adjuvant therapy was the most effective for identifying high-risk patients, strongly suggesting the presence of residual disease. This study comprehensively reviewed the clinical settings of ctDNA testing in ongoing trials and provided evidence supporting the selection of post-adjuvant therapy as the optimal timing for ctDNA testing.

Pelvic exenteration (PE) is a complex surgical procedure used to treat patients with recurrent or locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) as a final recourse. Thus, minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has emerged as an alternative to the traditional open PE as it may reduce surgical trauma and improve recovery. This meta-analysis compared the clinical outcomes between MIS and open PE in patients with LARC.

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA and AMSTAR guidelines. Six retrospective studies comprising 368 patients (179 MIS patients; 189 open patients) were included. Data on operative parameters along with short-term and long-term outcomes, including the 3-year overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), were extracted. Risk ratios (RRs) and odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for binary outcomes, while standardised mean differences (SMDs) were calculated for continuous outcomes. All measures were reported with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using random-effects models.

MIS was associated with significantly reduced blood loss (standardised mean difference (SMD), - 1.57; 95% CI, - 2.27 to - 0.88; p < 0.00001), shorter hospital stays (SMD, - 6.46; 95% CI, - 12.21 to - 0.71; p = 0.03), and quicker diet resumption (SMD: - 0.79; 95% CI, - 1.36 to - 0.21; p = 0.008) than open PE. MIS was associated with a borderline reduction in total complications (OR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.20-1.00; p = 0.05) and lower rates of abdominal wound complications (OR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.45; p < 0.0001). No significant differences were observed in R0 resection rates, major complications, or mortality. For long-term outcomes, MIS demonstrated significantly improved 3-year OS (RR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.41; p = 0.04), whereas 3-year DFS showed no significant difference (RR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.41; p = 0.87).

MIS offers significant short-term advantages over open PE, including reduced blood loss, faster recovery, and fewer complications while demonstrating improved 3-year OS. These findings support MIS PE as a safe, effective, and viable option for patients with recurrent or LARC.

The C-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte (CALLY) index is a novel score that offers a good reflection of nutritional status, inflammatory response, and immune system status. The CALLY index is reported to correlate with the prognosis of various carcinomas. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the association between the CALLY index and the short-term prognosis of obstructive colorectal cancer managed with a colonic stent.

The subjects of this retrospective study were 263 patients who underwent colorectal resection after colonic stenting for obstructive colorectal cancer between 2016 and 2023. Patients were classified into a group with a low CALLY index (CALLY-L group, n = 85) and a group with a high (CALLY-H group, n = 178) CALLY index.

The CALLY-L group had greater blood loss (53 mL vs 20 mL, p = 0.002) and higher poor performance status (PS3; 20% vs 10.1%, p = 0.033), open surgery (21.2% vs 7.3%, p = 0.001), distant metastases (41.2% vs 20.8%, p = 0.01), and postoperative complications (30.6% vs. 18.5%, p = 0.039) than the CALLY-H group. Multivariate analysis identified a prolonged operative time (odds ratio 1.983, 95% confidence interval 1.013-3.881; p = 0.045), greater blood loss (odds ratio 2.572, 95% confidence interval 1.291-5.129; p = 0.007) and a low CALLY index (odds ratio 1.961, 95% confidence interval 1.013-3.795; p = 0.045) as independent predictors of complications.

The CALLY index may be a useful predictor of postoperative complications of obstructive colorectal cancer.

Treatment of rectal cancer has improved significantly over the past decades. However, the role of adjuvant chemotherapy remains a matter of debate. The aim of this study is to evaluate the association between adjuvant chemotherapy and overall survival of patients with rectal cancer.

Data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry were used to evaluate all nonmetastatic pathological node-positive patients who underwent treatment for rectal cancer during the time period 2009-2020 in the Netherlands. Patients were grouped according to whether they received adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients were further divided into three groups according to the type of preoperative treatment. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied based on patient-related variables, tumour-related variables and treatment-related variables. The matching procedure for PSM was done with nearest neighbour and without replacement employing a 1:1 ratio. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed after PSM to compare overall survival.

A total of 7479 patients were included, of whom 865 (11.6%) underwent adjuvant chemotherapy. After PSM the no neoadjuvant treatment group included 240 patients per study arm, the neoadjuvant radiotherapy group 317 and the neoadjuvant chemoradiation group 182 patients. A significant difference in 5-year survival was found comparing adjuvant versus no adjuvant chemotherapy in all subgroups: no neoadjuvant treatment 54.6% vs. 40.8% (p = 0.003), neoadjuvant radiotherapy 77.0% vs. 53.9% (p < 0.001) and neoadjuvant chemoradiation 68.1% vs. 45.6% (p < 0.001).

Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with an improved 5-year survival in all subgroups. The role of adjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of rectal cancer should be reconsidered in node-positive patients.

Prognosis of pancreatic cancer is improved by combining postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy and preoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with surgery, while the importance of extended dissection surgery has decreased. To better understand prognostic factors of recurrence, we focused on the timing of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with pancreatic cancer.

One hundred patients who underwent pancreatectomy or pancreaticoduodenectomy and chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer were classified into early and late postoperative adjuvant therapy initiation groups. Prognosis was evaluated retrospectively using known prognostic factors.

On receiver operating characteristic analysis, optimum cut-off between the early (<52 days; n = 60) and late adjuvant initiation groups (≥52 days; n = 40) was 52 days. The two groups were well-matched, except the early initiation group had more surgeries with D2 lymph node dissection (75 % vs 48 %; p = 0.01); fewer postoperative complications (17 % vs 59 %; p = 0.04), including less postoperative pancreatic fistula (13 % vs 35 %; p = 0.03); and longer disease-free survival (0.7 years v 0.5 years; p = 0.02). On multivariate evaluation, early initiation and completion of adjuvant therapy were associated with increased overall survival, while early initiation was associated with prolonged disease-free survival.

Prognosis of patients with pancreatic cancer is improved by earlier rather than later initiation of postoperative adjuvant therapy.

Disease-free survival (DFS) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) is an important factor in affecting the quality of life and determining the subsequent treatment procedures for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). This study aimed to develop a novel prognostic model for predicting the DFS in patients with LARC following nCRT and to verify its effectiveness.

Patients with LARC who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and nCRT at our institution between November 2017 and March 2022 were enrolled in this retrospective study. Clinicopathologic data and MRI indicators of all patients were collected and evaluated. All patients were divided into DFS and non-DFS groups according to the presence or absence of local recurrence or distant metastasis. The differences in the b-value threshold (bthreshold) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values between the DFS and non-DFS groups were compared. The Cox analyses were used to determine the risk factors in predicting the DFS. A merged model was established based on the risk factors, and a nomogram was constructed. The predictive performances of the merged model were validated using the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) and decision curve analysis (DCA).

Of the 524 patients enrolled, 132 who underwent surgical resection post-nCRT were included in the final analysis. The post-neoadjuvant therapy pathological N stage, extramural venous invasion (EMVI), and bthreshold were independent factors in predicting the DFS. The C-index of the model was 0.688. The area under the curve (AUC) of the nomogram in predicting the 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of patients was 0.731, 0.723, and 0.779, respectively. The DCA demonstrated that the merged model had a greater advantage than either the "all" or the "none" scheme when the threshold probability was between 0.1 and 0.65.

A merged model based on the bthreshold value and clinicopathological features showed the potential to predict the prognosis of patients with LARC after nCRT and surgery.

About half of the patients diagnosed with colon cancer are 70 years or older. Standard treatment for stage III colon cancer is major surgical resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT). Norwegian guidelines recommend initiation of ACT within 6 weeks after resection.

This study investigated socioeconomic and geographic variation in the recommended provision of ACT to elderly patients with stage III colon cancer in Norway.

This population-based retrospective cohort study included patients aged 70 years or older diagnosed with stage III colon cancer between 2011 and 2021 who underwent major surgical resection. Individual data were obtained from national registries. Multilevel logistic regression analysis was used to model variation in provision of ACT.

Of 4 501 included patients, 603 (13%) and 1 182 (26%) received ACT within 6 and 8 weeks after resection, respectively. The provision of ACT decreased with increasing age and frailty. Odds of ACT within 6 weeks decreased for patients with low socioeconomic status (SES) compared to high SES (odds ratio (OR) 0.67 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.50-0.91)), and decreased for patients living alone compared to those living with a cohabitant (OR 0.72 (95% CI 0.58-0.91)). Geographic variation was found between hospital referral areas (OR 0.41-2.58).

Our study found that ACT provision to elderly stage III colon cancer patients is associated with SES and geography, indicating variation in guidelines adherence. Further research is needed to explore the impact of ACT timing among elderly patients with stage III colon cancer in Norway.

Despite advances in surgical procedures, cancer recurrence still affects a substantial proportion of patients for whom surgery is considered a curative therapy. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of RIOT, addressing its definition, influencing factors, and clinical implications.

RIOT can be defined as a continuous variable as the time from surgery to initiation of adjuvant therapies or categorically as whether patients can successfully receive adjuvant therapies or not. Factors influencing RIOT are age, sex, socioeconomic status, access to healthcare, physical performance and comorbidities, and quality of anesthesia and surgical care. Adjuvant therapies such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy are often administered to reduce the risk of recurrence after surgery and improve survival. Return to intended oncologic therapy (RIOT) has emerged as a promising outcome metric reflecting patients' functional recovery after surgery and their ability to receive adjuvant therapies.

Racial disparities in treatment and outcomes of rectal cancer have been attributed to patients' differential access to care. We aimed to study treatment and outcomes of rectal cancer in the equal access Military Health System (MHS) to better understand potential racial disparities.

We accessed the MilCanEpi database to study a cohort of patients aged 18 and older who were diagnosed with rectal adenocarcinoma between 1998 and 2014. Receipt of guideline recommended treatment per tumor stage, cancer recurrence, and all-cause death were compared between non-Hispanic White and Black patients using multivariable regression models with associations expressed as odds (AORs) or hazard ratios (AHRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

The study included 171 Black and 845 White patients with rectal adenocarcinoma. Overall, there were no differences in receipt of guideline concordant treatment (AOR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.45 to 1.29), recurrence (AHR = 1.34, 95% CI = 0.85 to 2.12), or survival (AHR = 1.08, 95% CI = 0.77 to 1.54) for Black patients compared with White patients. However, Black patients younger than 50 years of age at diagnosis (AOR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.13 to 0.90) or with stage III or IV tumors (AOR = 0.28, 95% CI = 0.12 to 0.64) were less likely to receive guideline recommended treatment than White patients in stratified analysis.

In the equal access MHS, although there were no overall racial disparities in rectal cancer treatment or clinical outcomes between Black and White patients, disparities among those with early-onset or late-stage rectal cancers were noted. This suggests that factors other than access to care may play a role in the observed disparities and warrants further research.

Delay in initiating adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) after curative resection of colorectal cancer (CRC) has been reported to lead to poor prognosis, but few studies have looked at associated factors. This study aimed to identify risk factors for delay in initiating AC.

Data from 200 consecutive patients who underwent curative resection and AC for stage III CRC between 2013 and 2018 were retrospectively collected and analyzed.

AC was initiated more than 8 weeks after surgery in 12.5% of patients (the delay group). Compared to those with no delay (the non-delay group), patients in the delay group had significantly higher rates of synchronous double cancers (2.3% vs. 16.0%, p = 0.001), preoperative bowel obstruction (10.3% vs. 32.0%, p = 0.003), laparotomy (56.0% vs. 80.0%, p = 0.02), concomitant resection (2.9% vs. 24.0%, p < 0.001), and postoperative complications (32.0% vs. 56.0%, p = 0.02), and a significantly longer length of hospital stay (median 12 vs. 30 days, p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, synchronous double cancers (odds ratio 10.2, p = 0.008), preoperative bowel obstruction (odds ratio 4.6, p = 0.01), concomitant resection (odds ratio 5.2, p = 0.03), and postoperative complications of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ IIIa (odds ratio 4.0, p = 0.03) were identified as independent risk factors for delay in initiating AC.

Careful preoperative treatment planning for CRC patients with synchronous double cancers, preoperative bowel obstruction, and concomitant resection, and management for postoperative complication are necessary to avoid delay in initiating AC.

Adjuvant chemotherapy following curative surgery for locally advanced gastric cancer (AGC) significantly improves long-term patient prognosis. However, delayed chemotherapy (DC), in which patients are unable to receive timely treatment, is a common phenomenon in clinical practice for various reasons. This study aimed to investigate the impact of DC on the prognosis of patients with stage II-III locally AGC and explore the associated risk factors.

Data from four prospective studies were included in the pooled analysis. The planned chemotherapy (PC) group was defined as the time interval between surgery and the first chemotherapy ≤ 49 d, while the DC group was defined as the time interval between surgery and chemotherapy > 49 d. The prognosis, recurrence, and risk factors were compared, and a nomogram for predicting DC was established.

In total, 596 patients were included, of whom 531 (89.1%) had PC and 65 (10.9%) had DC. Survival analysis revealed that the 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were significantly lower in the DC group than those in the PC group (log-rank P < 0.001). Cox univariable and multivariable analyses showed that DC was an independent risk factor for OS and DFS in stage II-III patients (P < 0.05). Based on the significant factors for DC, a prediction model was established that had a good fit, high accuracy (AUC = 0.780), and clinical applicability in both the training and validation sets.

Delayed chemotherapy after gastrectomy is associated with poor long-term prognosis in patients with locally advanced stage II-III GC disease. But standardized, full-cycle adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery may play a remedial role, and can to a certain extent compensate the poor effects caused by delayed chemotherapy.

Survival data on patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) undergoing non-operative management (NOM) in a real-world setting are lacking.

We analyzed LARC patients from the National Cancer Database with the following features: treated between 2010 and 2020, age 18-65 years, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) ≤ 1, received neoadjuvant multiagent chemotherapy plus radiation ≥ 45 Gray, and underwent surgery or NOM. Patients were stratified into two groups: (A) clinical T1-3 tumors with positive nodes (cT1-3N+) and (B) clinical T4 tumors, N+/- (cT4N+/-). We performed a comparative analysis of overall survival (OS) with NOM versus surgery by the Kaplan-Meier method and propensity score matching. Additionally, a multivariable analysis explored the association between NOM and OS.

NOM exhibited significantly lower OS than surgery in both groups. In cT1-3N+ patients, NOM resulted in a 5-year OS of 73.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 69.7-77.6%) versus 84.5% (95% CI = 83.6-85.3%) with surgery (p < 0.001). In the cT4N+/- group, NOM yielded a 5-year OS of 44.5% (95% CI = 37.0-51.8%) versus 72.5% (95% CI = 69.9-74.8%) with surgery (p < 0.001). Propensity score matching and multivariable analyses revealed similar conclusions.

Patients with LARC undergoing NOM versus surgery in real-world settings appear to have inferior survival.

To compare outcomes after laparoscopic versus open major liver resection (hemihepatectomy) mainly for primary or metastatic cancer. The primary outcome measure was time to functional recovery. Secondary outcomes included morbidity, quality of life (QoL), and for those with cancer, resection margin status and time to adjuvant systemic therapy.

This was a multicenter, randomized controlled, patient-blinded, superiority trial on adult patients undergoing hemihepatectomy. Patients were recruited from 16 hospitals in Europe between November 2013 and December 2018.

Of the 352 randomly assigned patients, 332 patients (94.3%) underwent surgery (laparoscopic, n = 166 and open, n = 166) and comprised the analysis population. The median time to functional recovery was 4 days (IQR, 3-5; range, 1-30) for laparoscopic hemihepatectomy versus 5 days (IQR, 4-6; range, 1-33) for open hemihepatectomy (difference, -17.5% [96% CI, -25.6 to -8.4]; P < .001). There was no difference in major complications (laparoscopic 24/166 [14.5%] v open 28/166 [16.9%]; odds ratio [OR], 0.84; P = .58). Regarding QoL, both global health status (difference, 3.2 points; P < .001) and body image (difference, 0.9 points; P < .001) scored significantly higher in the laparoscopic group. For the 281 (84.6%) patients with cancer, R0 resection margin status was similar (laparoscopic 106 [77.9%] v open 122 patients [84.1%], OR, 0.60; P = .14) with a shorter time to adjuvant systemic therapy in the laparoscopic group (46.5 days v 62.8 days, hazard ratio, 2.20; P = .009).

Among patients undergoing hemihepatectomy, the laparoscopic approach resulted in a shorter time to functional recovery compared with open surgery. In addition, it was associated with a better QoL, and in patients with cancer, a shorter time to adjuvant systemic therapy with no adverse impact on cancer outcomes observed.

In the 1930s, the federally sponsored Home Owners' Loan Corporation (HOLC) used racial composition in its assessment of areas worthy of receiving loans. Neighborhoods with large proportions of Black residents were mapped in red (ie, redlining) and flagged as hazardous for mortgage financing. Redlining created a platform for systemic disinvestment in these neighborhoods, leading to barriers in access to resources that persist today. We investigated the association between residing in areas with different HOLC ratings and receipt of quality cancer care and outcomes among individuals diagnosed with colon cancer-a leading cause of cancer deaths amenable to early detection and treatment.

Individuals who resided in zip code tabulation areas in 196 cities with HOLC rating and were diagnosed with colon cancer from 2007 to 2017 were identified from the National Cancer Database and assigned a HOLC grade (A, best; B, still desirable; C, definitely declining; and D, hazardous and mapped in red). Multivariable logistic regression models investigated association of area-level HOLC grade and late stage at diagnosis and receipt of guideline-concordant care. The product-limit method evaluated differences in time to adjuvant chemotherapy. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models investigated differences in overall survival (OS).

There were 149,917 patients newly diagnosed with colon cancer with a median age of 68 years. Compared with people living in HOLC A areas, people living in HOLC D areas were more likely to be diagnosed with late-stage disease (adjusted odds ratio, 1.06 [95% CI, 1.00 to 1.12]). In addition, people living in HOLC B, C, and D areas had 8%, 16%, and 24% higher odds of not receiving guideline-concordant care, including lower receipt of surgery, evaluation of ≥12 lymph nodes, and chemotherapy. People residing in HOLC B, C, or D areas also experienced delays in initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery. People residing in HOLC C (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.09 [95% CI, 1.05 to 1.13]) and D (aHR, 1.13 [95% CI, 1.09 to 1.18]) areas had worse OS, including 13% and 20% excess risk of death for individuals diagnosed with early- and 6% and 8% for late-stage disease for HOLC C and D, respectively.

Historical housing discrimination is associated with worse contemporary access to colon cancer care and outcomes.

This article is a summary of the French intergroup guidelines regarding the management of non-metastatic colon cancer (CC), revised in November 2022.

These guidelines represent collaborative work of all French medical and surgical societies involved in the management of CC. Recommendations were graded in three categories (A, B, and C) according to the level of evidence found in the literature published up to November 2022.

Initial evaluation of CC is based on clinical examination, colonoscopy, chest-abdomen-pelvis computed tomography (CT) scan, and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) assay. CC is usually managed by surgery and adjuvant treatment depending on the pathological findings. The use of adjuvant therapy remains a challenging question in stage II disease. For high-risk stage II CC, adjuvant chemotherapy must be discussed and fluoropyrimidine monotherapy or oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy proposed according to the type and number of poor prognostic features. Oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (FOLFOX or CAPOX) is the current standard for adjuvant therapy of patients with stage III CC. However, these regimens are associated with significant oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity. The results of the recent IDEA study provide evidence that 3 months of treatment with CAPOX is as effective as 6 months of oxaliplatin-based therapy in patients with low-risk stage III CC (T1-3 and N1). A 6-month oxaliplatin-based therapy remains the standard of care for high-risk stage III CC (T4 and/or N2). For patients unfit for oxaliplatin, fluoropyrimidine monotherapy is recommended.

French guidelines for non-metastatic CC management help to offer the best personalized therapeutic strategy in daily clinical practice. Each individual case must be discussed within a multidisciplinary tumor board and then the treatment option decided with the patient.

Young individuals racialized as Black are more likely to die after a colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosis than individuals racialized as White in the United States. This study examined racial disparities in receipt of timely and guideline-concordant care among individuals racialized as Black and White with early-onset CRC.

Individuals age 18-49 years racialized as non-Hispanic Black and White (self-identified) and newly diagnosed with CRC during 2004-2019 were selected from the National Cancer Database. Patients who received recommended care (staging, surgery, lymph node evaluation, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy) were considered to have received guideline-concordant care. Odds ratios (ORs) were adjusted for age and sex. The decomposition method was used to estimate the relative contribution of demographic characteristics (age and sex), comorbidities, health insurance, and facility type to the racial disparity in receipt of guideline-concordant care. The product-limit method was used to evaluate differences in time to treatment between patients racialized as Black and White.

Of the 84,882 patients with colon cancer and 62,573 patients with rectal cancer, 20.8% and 14.5% were racialized as Black, respectively. Individuals racialized as Black were more likely to not receive guideline-concordant care for colon (adjusted OR [aOR], 1.18 [95% CI, 1.14 to 1.22]) and rectal (aOR, 1.27 [95% CI, 1.21 to 1.33]) cancers. Health insurance explained 28.2% and 21.6% of the disparity among patients with colon and rectal cancer, respectively. Individuals racialized as Black had increased time to adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer (hazard ratio [HR], 1.28 [95% CI, 1.24 to 1.32]) and neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer (HR, 1.42 [95% CI, 1.37 to 1.47]) compared with individuals racialized as White.

Patients with early-onset CRC racialized as Black receive worse and less timely care than individuals racialized as White. Health insurance, a modifiable factor, was the largest contributor to racial disparities in receipt of guideline-concordant care in this study.

Protective ileostomy can effectively prevent severe anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery; however, the optimal timing for ileostomy closure during adjuvant chemotherapy remains unclear. This study aimed to explore the safety and long-term outcomes of early ileostomy closure during adjuvant chemotherapy.

Patients who underwent laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery combined with protective ileostomy and adjuvant chemotherapy between April 2017 and April 2021 were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were divided into an early closure group during chemotherapy (group A) and a late closure group after chemotherapy (group B).

A total of 215 patients were included in this study, with 115 in group A and 100 in group B. There were no significant differences in demographic and clinical characteristics between the two groups. In group A, durations of stoma status (p < 0.001) and low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) (p < 0.001) were shorter, and rectal stenosis (p=0.036) and stoma-related complications (p=0.007), especially stoma stenosis (p=0.041), were less common. However, compliance with chemotherapy was worse (p=0.009). There were no significant differences in operative time, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative complications, incidence and severity of LARS, disease-free survival, or overall survival between groups.

Early ileostomy closure can effectively reduce the duration of stoma status, duration of LARS, rectal stenosis, and stoma-related complications while not affecting surgical complications and oncological outcomes. Ileostomy closure should not be delayed because of adjuvant chemotherapy. However, follow-up should be strengthened to increase compliance and integrity with chemotherapy.

For patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) peritoneal metastases (PM) who are eligible for cytoreductive surgery (CRS), the indication and timing of systemic chemotherapy (SC) are still under debate. This study aims to analyze the role of pre, post or perioperative SC on the survival and surgical complications of patients treated with CRS-HIPEC.

After a systematic search in MEDLINE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Scopus, Web of Science and Embase, a meta-analysis was performed to compare postoperative complications, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) according to SC administration and timing.

CRD42023478977.

Of 1203 studies screened, 15 were included in the meta-analysis (4523 patients). Post-operative SC was associated with increased overall survival (post-SC vs. no post-SC: HR 0.81, p = 0.00001, I2 = 0%; pre-SC vs. post-SC: HR 0.65, p = 0.01, I2 = 28%), whereas SC (pre or post) or pre-SC compared to surgery alone was not (SC vs. no SC: p = 0.29, I2 = 80%; pre-SC vs. no pre-SC: p = 0.59, I2 = 58%). Similar results were seen for DFS. SC was not associated with an increased complication rate (p = 0.47, I2 = 64%).

Systemic chemotherapy administration in patients undergoing radical surgery for colorectal peritoneal metastases is associated with increased survival only in the adjuvant/post-operative setting. Considering the limitations of the included studies, further trials are needed to answer this unresolved question.

We have shown in a Phase I trial that immediate adjuvant chemotherapy (IAC) during surgical resection and immediately postoperative is safe and feasible in patients with colon cancer (CC). IAC avoids delays in adjuvant treatment and has the potential to improve survival and quality of life. We aim to determine patients and providers attitudes toward this novel multidisciplinary treatment approach.

Two web-based surveys were administered to newly diagnosed CC patients, survivors, surgeons and oncologists. Surveys assessed treatment preferences and perceived barriers to IAC. Chi-square tests were conducted to compare differences between patients' and providers' responses.

Responses were collected from 35 patients and 40 providers. Patients were more willing to: (1) proceed with IAC to finish treatment earlier thus possibly improving quality of life (p = 0.001); (2) proceed with IAC despite potential side effects (p < 0.001); and (3) proceed with a dose of intraoperative chemotherapy even if on final pathology, may not have been needed (p = 0.002). Patients were more likely to indicate no barriers to collaborative care (p = 0.001) while providers were more likely to cite that it is time consuming, thus a barrier to participation (p = 0.001), has scheduling challenges (p = 0.001), and physicians are not available to participate (p = 0.003).

We observed a discordance between what providers and patients value in perioperative and adjuvant CC treatment. Patients are willing to accept IAC despite potential side effects and without survival benefit, highlighting the importance of understanding patient preference.

The current standard-of-care adjuvant treatment for patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) comprises a fluoropyrimidine (5-fluorouracil or capecitabine) as a single agent or in combination with oxaliplatin, for either 3 or 6 months. Selection of therapy depends on conventional histopathological staging procedures, which constitute a blunt tool for patient stratification. Given the relatively marginal survival benefits that patients can derive from adjuvant treatment, improving the safety of chemotherapy regimens and identifying patients most likely to benefit from them is an area of unmet need. Patient stratification should enable distinguishing those at low risk of recurrence and a high chance of cure by surgery from those at higher risk of recurrence who would derive greater absolute benefits from chemotherapy. To this end, genetic analyses have led to the discovery of germline determinants of toxicity from fluoropyrimidines, the identification of patients at high risk of life-threatening toxicity, and enabling dose modulation to improve safety. Thus far, results from analyses of resected tissue to identify mutational or transcriptomic signatures with value as prognostic biomarkers have been rather disappointing. In the past few years, the application of artificial intelligence-driven models to digital images of resected tissue has identified potentially useful algorithms that stratify patients into distinct prognostic groups. Similarly, liquid biopsy approaches involving measurements of circulating tumour DNA after surgery are additionally useful tools to identify patients at high and low risk of tumour recurrence. In this Perspective, we provide an overview of the current landscape of adjuvant therapy for patients with CRC and discuss how new technologies will enable better personalization of therapy in this setting.

Although adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) increases survival in early-stage gastric cancer, the effect of the time between gastrectomy and the initiation of AC on survival has not been clearly demonstrated. This study aimed to examine the effect of AC timing on survival.

The data of patients who received AC in the postoperative period with the diagnosis of stage II and stage III gastric cancer were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were separated into two groups based on a 4-week cut-off value between the date of gastrectomy and the initiation of AC.

There were 151 patients enrolled in the study. It was determined that 63 (41.7%) patients started AC in the first 4 weeks and 88 (58.3%) patients after the first 4 weeks. Patients who received AC during the first 4 weeks had a median recurrence-free survival (RFS) of 46 months, while those who received AC after 4 weeks had a median RFS of 29 months (p = 0.039). The median overall survival (OS) for patients administered AC in the first 4 weeks was 65 months, compared to 45 months for those administered AC after 4 weeks (p = 0.036). The early time interval from surgery to AC resulted as an independent prognostic factor for both OS and RFS.

The optimal time to start AC in patients with gastric cancer who underwent curative resection is unknown. This study reported that an interval shorter than 4 weeks was an independent prognostic risk factor for both OS and RFS.

It is unclear how early- and delayed-onset organ/space surgical site infections (SSIs) affect the long-term prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer, who are potential candidates for adjuvant chemotherapy. This study aimed to investigate the association between the timing of SSI onset and clinical outcome.

This retrospective, multicenter cohort study evaluated patients who were diagnosed with high-risk stage II or III colorectal cancer and underwent elective surgery between 2010 and 2020. Five-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) was the primary endpoint and was compared between early SSI, delayed SSI (divided based on the median date of SSI onset), and non-SSI groups.

A total of 2,065 patients were included. Organ/space SSI was diagnosed in 91 patients (4.4%), with a median onset of 6 days after surgery. The early-onset SSI group had a higher proportion of patients with Clavien-Dindo grade ≥IIIb SSI than the delayed-onset SSI. Patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) had earlier organ/space SSI onset than those who did not. The adjusted hazard ratio of 5-year RFS in the delayed-onset SSI was 2.58 (95% confidence interval: 1.43-4.65; p = 0.002): higher than that in the early-onset SSI, with the non-SSI as the reference.

Delayed-onset organ/space SSI worsened long-term prognosis compared to early-onset, and this may be due to delayed initiation of AC. Patients who are clinically suspected of having lymph node metastasis might need additional intervention to prevent delays in commencing AC due to the delayed SSI.

Colon cancer is an important cause of mortality related to cancer. During the COVID-19 pandemic, an important reallotment of assistance resources was necessary to tackle the crisis, directly impacting medical practice all over the globe.

To assess the impact of the Sars-Cov-2 pandemic on the time between diagnosis and the beginning of systemic treatment in patients diagnosed with high-risk colon neoplasia.

This is a retrospective study based on the analysis of medical records of patients diagnosed with colon neoplasia who required systemic treatment and were treated between March 2019 and March 2022, in a reference Oncology unit of the Brazilian Unified Health System. The study's population was divided into two groups: (I) Pre-COVID-19: diagnoses made between March 2019 and February 2020, (II) COVID-19: diagnoses made between March 2020 and March 2022.

The sample consisted of 228 patients, 108 (47.97%) of whom were diagnosed during pre-COVID-19 and 118 (52.21%) diagnosed during the two years-period of COVID-19. Regarding the time between colonoscopy and surgery, the time between surgery and first consultation in clinical oncology, and the time between requesting and beginning of systemic treatment, a statistically significant reduction was observed during the COVID-19 period.

A decrease in time between diagnosis and systemic treatment of patients with colorectal cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic was observed. Yet, even with this improvement, the time to begin treatment remains greater than the recommended by the current guidelines, regardless of the time of diagnosis (before or after the pandemic), which negatively impacts the disease outcome.

Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is one of the most common tumors in adult, but is extremely rare in children. In childhood, CRC often presents unfavorable aggressive histotypes, advanced clinical stage at onset and a worse prognosis. Pediatric CRC series are limited and include few patients, therefore information about treatment strategy and pharmacotherapy is scarce. For this reason, management of these patients represents a real challenge for pediatric oncologists.

The authors provide an overview of the general features and management strategies of pediatric CRC with specific attention to systemic treatment. Literature data regarding pharmacotherapy in published pediatric series are summarized and analyzed in detail, according to adult treatment standards.

In the absence of specific recommendations for pediatric CRC, the general therapeutic strategy should follow the same principles as for adults and should be the result of a multidisciplinary discussion. Patient access to optimal treatment is difficult due to the lack of new drugs approved for the pediatric age group and non-availability of clinical trials. Collaboration between pediatric and adult oncologists is considered crucial in order to overcome these issues and find solutions to increase knowledge and improve the outcome of such a rare disease in children.

Radiologic imaging, especially MRI, has long been the mainstay for rectal cancer staging and patient selection for neoadjuvant therapy prior to surgical resection. In contrast, colonoscopy and CT have been the standard for colon cancer diagnosis and metastasis staging with T and N staging often performed at the time of surgical resection. With recent clinical trials exploring the expansion of the use of neoadjuvant therapy beyond the anorectum to the remainder of the colon, the current and future state of colon cancer treatment is evolving with a renewed interest in evaluating the role radiology may play in the primary T staging of colon cancer. The performance of CT, CT colonography, MRI, and FDG PET-CT for colon cancer staging will be reviewed. N staging will also be briefly discussed. It is expected that accurate radiologic T staging will significantly impact future clinical decisions regarding the neoadjuvant versus surgical management of colon cancer.

Whether patients with asymptomatic primary tumors and unresectable metastases of colorectal cancer (CRC) should undergo primary tumor resection (PTR) remains controversial. This study aims to determine the appropriateness of PTR for these individuals by evaluating a number of outcome measures.

A systematic literature search was performed. Outcome measures included overall survival, emergency surgery rates, incidence of postoperative complications, time to initiate chemotherapy, conversion rates, and chemotherapy-related toxicities.

Patients who received PTR in addition to chemotherapy had a better overall survival rate than those who only received chemotherapy (HR = 0.62, 95%CI, 0.50-0.78, I2 = 84%, p < 0.00001). In the RCT subgroup, there were no significant differences with a HR of 0.72 (95%CI, 0.45-1.13, I2 = 17%, p = 0.15). More patients in the chemotherapy alone group could be converted to resectable status (OR = 0.47, 95%CI, 0.27-0.82, I2 = 0%, p = 0.008), but the incidence of emergency surgery was 23% (95%CI, 17-29%, I2 = 14%). The risk of chemotherapy-related toxicity was not significantly higher in the PTR group (OR = 1.5, 95%CI, 0.94-2.43, p = 0.09, I2 = 0%), with a 7% incidence of postoperative complications (95%CI, 0-14%, p = 0.05, I2 = 0%). The time to initiate chemotherapy after PTR was approximately 33.06 days (95%CI, 25.55-40.58, I2 = 0%).

PTR plus chemotherapy may be associated with improved survival in asymptomatic CRC patients with unresectable metastases. However, PTR did not provide a significant survival benefit in the subgroup of RCTs. Additionally, PTR did not result in a significantly increased risk of chemotherapy-related toxicity, with a postoperative complication rate of approximately 7%, and chemotherapy could be initiated at approximately 33.06 days after PTR. Compared with the PTR plus chemotherapy, chemotherapy alone could result in a significantly higher conversion rate. However, about 23% of patients receiving chemotherapy alone required emergency surgery for primary tumor-related symptoms. The above results needed to be validated in future larger prospective randomized trials.

Climate disasters have devastating effects on communities and society that encompass all aspects of daily life, including healthcare. Patients with cancer are particularly vulnerable when disaster strikes. As the number and intensity of disasters increases, it is important to understand the effects across the cancer care continuum. This systematic review investigates the effect of climate disasters on patients, the oncology healthcare workforce, and healthcare systems.

A medical librarian conducted a literature search in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science from January 1, 2016, through May 11, 2022. Eligible studies included any published report on a climate disaster globally reporting on patient-, oncology healthcare workforce-, or healthcare systems-level outcomes. Study quality was assessed, and findings were narratively synthesized, given the diversity of reported evidence.

The literature search identified 3618 records, of which 46 publications were eligible for inclusion. The most frequent climate disaster was hurricanes (N = 27) followed by tsunami (N = 10). Eighteen publications were from disasters that occurred in the mainland USA with 13 from Japan and 12 from Puerto Rico. Patient-level outcomes included treatment interruptions and inability to communicate with the healthcare team. At the workforce level, findings included distressed clinicians caring for others when their own lives have been affected by a disaster along with lack of disaster preparedness training. Health systems reported closures or shifting services post-disaster and a need to have improved emergency response plans.

Response to climate disasters necessitates a holistic approach at the patient, workforce, and health systems levels. Specifically, interventions should focus on mitigating interruptions in care for patients, advanced coordination and planning for workforce and health systems, and contingency planning for allocation of resources by health systems.

A recovery period between surgery and initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) is common in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), which can progress after a relatively long time. Therefore, the efficacy of AC initiated within 90 days after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) was evaluated in UTUC patients at stage ≥pT2 (N0-3M0), in addition to the effect of delayed AC initiation on survival outcomes.

Clinical data for 428 UTUC patients diagnosed with transitional cell carcinoma with postoperatively confirmed pathological stages, muscle-invasive or greater-stage (pT2-4) disease, any nodal status, and metastasis-free (M0) disease were retrospectively analyzed. All patients who received AC were treated within 90 days after RNU and underwent at least 4 cycles of the AC procedure. Then, patients receiving AC were divided into the "within 45 days" and "45 to 90 days" groups according to the time interval between RNU and AC initiation. Their clinicopathological characteristics were evaluated and the survival outcomes of the 2 groups were compared. Any adverse events that occurred during the AC process were also recorded.

A total of 428 patients were analyzed in the study, including 132 individuals who underwent the AC procedure with platinum in combination with gemcitabine within 90 days after RNU and 296 patients who failed to initiate AC within 90 days. The median age of all patients was 68 years (mean 67, range 28-90 years), and the median follow-up was 25 months (mean 36, range 1-129 months). There were no significant differences in age, sex, lymph node metastasis, tumor location, hydronephrosis status, hematuria status, cancer grade, or multifocality between the 2 groups. Individuals undergoing AC initiated within 90 days of RNU showed a significantly decreased mortality relative to those patients who did not receive AC. Shorter intervals between RNU and AC initiation within 45 days vs. 45-90 days did not improve patient OS and cancer-specific survival (CSS) and may have increased the incidence of adverse events.

The present study data supported the finding that a platinum-based combination with gemcitabine regimen initiated postoperatively significantly improved OS and CSS in patients with UTUC at stages ≥pT2 (N0-3M0). Furthermore, no survival benefit was evident in patients who started AC within 45 days after RNU compared to those who received AC within 45 to 90 days.

Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) is now well-accepted as standard for high-risk stage II and stage III colorectal cancer (CRC) patients, however the optimal time to initiate AC remains elusive.

A comprehensive literature search was performed using the PubMed and Embase databases. The Hazard ratio (HR) with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) was used as an effect measure to evaluate primary endpoints. All analyses were conducted using Stata software version 12.0 with the Random-effects model.

A total of 30 studies were included in our study. Upon comparison on overall survival (OS), we identified that delaying the initiation of AC for > 8 weeks after operation was significantly associated with poor OS (HR: 1.37; 95% CI: 1.27-1.48; P < 0.01). The poor prognostic value of AC delay for > 8 weeks was not undermined by subgroup analysis based on region, tumor site, sample size and study quality. No obvious differences were observed in survival between AC within 5-8 weeks and ≤ 4 weeks (HR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.96 -1.10; P = 0.46). Moreover, two studies both highlighted that the survival benefit of AC was still statistically significant when AC was applied 5-6 months after surgery compared with the non-chemotherapy group.

Delaying the initiation of AC for > 8 weeks after surgery was significantly associated with poor OS. AC started within 8 weeks after surgery brought more benefits to CRC patients. There were no obvious differences in survival benefits between AC within 5-8 weeks and ≤ 4 weeks. Compared to patients not receiving AC after surgery, a delay of approximately 5-6 months was still useful to improve prognosis.

Fluoropyrimidine drugs (FP) are the backbone of many chemotherapy protocols for treating solid tumours. The rate-limiting step of fluoropyrimidine catabolism is dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), and deficiency in DPD activity can result in severe and even fatal toxicity. In this review, we survey the evidence-based pharmacogenetics and therapeutic recommendations regarding DPYD (the gene encoding DPD) genotyping and DPD phenotyping to prevent toxicity and optimize dosing adaptation before FP administration. The French experience of mandatory DPD-deficiency screening prior to initiating FP is discussed.

Early initiation of chemotherapy after surgery for colon cancer has survival benefits. Immediate adjuvant chemotherapy (IAC) involves giving chemotherapy during surgical resection and immediately postoperatively. This novel approach has been shown to be safe, eliminating delays in adjuvant treatment that could increase the risk of micro-metastatic spread. The aim of this study was to assess the willingness of the general public to accept IAC.

Between March and April 2021, 800 telephone interviews were conducted with a sample of adult New York State residents. The Survey Research Institute of Cornell University conducted all surveys. Kruskal-Wallis, chi-squared, and Fisher's tests were conducted using R 4.0.2.

Three scenarios were presented: (1) receiving IAC resulting in improved survival and quality of life, (2) finishing chemotherapy earlier without survival impact, and (3) finishing chemotherapy earlier but with possible side effects. Respondents with higher education were more likely to accept (1) & (2), males were more likely to accept (2) & (3), higher income respondents were more likely to accept (1) & (3), and those with more work hours were more likely to accept (2). Lastly, 16% responded they would be very or extremely likely, and 52% respondents would be somewhat likely or likely to accept intraoperative chemotherapy, even if it may not be necessary.

Respondents were likely to accept IAC if offered. Given the known risk of delayed adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in colon cancer, further research is warranted to determine the survival and quality of life (QOL) benefits of IAC.

The implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery programme after colectomy reduces postoperative morbidity and shortens the length of hospital stay.

To evaluate the short and midterm outcomes of ambulatory colectomy for cancer.

This was a two-centre, observational study of a database maintained prospectively between 2013 and 2021. Short-term outcome measures were complications, admissions, unplanned consultations and readmission rates. Midterm outcome measures were the delay between surgery and initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy, length of disease-free survival and 2-year disease-free survival rate.

A total of 177 patients were included. The overall morbidity rate was 15% and the mortality rate was 0%. The admission rate was 13% and 11% patients left hospital within 24 h of surgery. The readmission rate was 9% and all readmissions occurred before postoperative Day 4. Eight patients underwent repeat surgery because of anastomotic fistula (n = 7) or anastomotic ileocolic bleeding (n = 1). These patients had an uneventful recovery. Sixty-one patients required adjuvant chemotherapy with a median delay between surgery and chemotherapy initiation of 35 days.

Ambulatory colectomy for cancer is feasible and safe. Adjuvant chemotherapy could be initiated before 6 weeks postsurgery. The ambulatory approach may be a step forward to further improve morbidity and oncologic prognosis.

The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted cancer care, raising concerns regarding the impact of wait time, or 'lag time', on clinical outcomes. We aimed to contextualize pandemic-related lag times by mapping pre-pandemic evidence from systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses on the association between lag time to cancer diagnosis and treatment with mortality- and morbidity-related outcomes.

We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library of Systematic Reviews for reviews published prior to the pandemic (1 January 2010-31 December 2019). We extracted data on methodological characteristics, lag time interval start and endpoints, qualitative findings from systematic reviews, and pooled risk estimates of mortality- (i.e., overall survival) and morbidity- (i.e., local regional control) related outcomes from meta-analyses. We categorized lag times according to milestones across the cancer care continuum and summarized outcomes by cancer site and lag time interval.

We identified 9032 records through database searches, of which 29 were eligible. We classified 33 unique types of lag time intervals across 10 cancer sites, of which breast, colorectal, head and neck, and ovarian cancers were investigated most. Two systematic reviews investigating lag time to diagnosis reported different findings regarding survival outcomes among paediatric patients with Ewing's sarcomas or central nervous system tumours. Comparable risk estimates of mortality were found for lag time intervals from surgery to adjuvant chemotherapy for breast, colorectal, and ovarian cancers. Risk estimates of pathologic complete response indicated an optimal time window of 7-8 weeks for neoadjuvant chemotherapy completion prior to surgery for rectal cancers. In comparing methods across meta-analyses on the same cancer sites, lag times, and outcomes, we identified critical variations in lag time research design.

Our review highlighted measured associations between lag time and cancer-related outcomes and identified the need for a standardized methodological approach in areas such as lag time definitions and accounting for the waiting-time paradox. Prioritization of lag time research is integral for revised cancer care guidelines under pandemic contingency and assessing the pandemic's long-term effect on patients with cancer.

The present work was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR-COVID-19 Rapid Research Funding opportunity, VR5-172666 grant to Eduardo L. Franco). Parker Tope, Eliya Farah, and Rami Ali each received an MSc. stipend from the Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, McGill University.