At a population level, the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE), the European Helicobacter and Microbiota Study Group (EHMSG), and the European Society of Pathology (ESP) suggest endoscopic screening for gastric cancer (and precancerous conditions) in high-risk regions (age-standardized rate [ASR] > 20 per 100 000 person-years) every 2 to 3 years or, if cost-effectiveness has been proven, in intermediate risk regions (ASR 10-20 per 100 000 person-years) every 5 years, but not in low-risk regions (ASR < 10).ESGE/EHMSG/ESP recommend that irrespective of country of origin, individual gastric risk assessment and stratification of precancerous conditions is recommended for first-time gastroscopy. ESGE/EHMSG/ESP suggest that gastric cancer screening or surveillance in asymptomatic individuals over 80 should be discontinued or not started, and that patients' comorbidities should be considered when treatment of superficial lesions is planned.ESGE/EHMSG/ESP recommend that a high quality endoscopy including the use of virtual chromoendoscopy (VCE), after proper training, is performed for screening, diagnosis, and staging of precancerous conditions (atrophy and intestinal metaplasia) and lesions (dysplasia or cancer), as well as after endoscopic therapy. VCE should be used to guide the sampling site for biopsies in the case of suspected neoplastic lesions as well as to guide biopsies for diagnosis and staging of gastric precancerous conditions, with random biopsies to be taken in the absence of endoscopically suspected changes. When there is a suspected early gastric neoplastic lesion, it should be properly described (location, size, Paris classification, vascular and mucosal pattern), photodocumented, and two targeted biopsies taken.ESGE/EHMSG/ESP do not recommend routine performance of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or positron emission tomography (PET)-CT prior to endoscopic resection unless there are signs of deep submucosal invasion or if the lesion is not considered suitable for endoscopic resection.ESGE/EHMSG/ESP recommend endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for differentiated gastric lesions clinically staged as dysplastic (low grade and high grade) or as intramucosal carcinoma (of any size if not ulcerated or ≤ 30 mm if ulcerated), with EMR being an alternative for Paris 0-IIa lesions of size ≤ 10 mm with low likelihood of malignancy.ESGE/EHMSG/ESP suggest that a decision about ESD can be considered for malignant lesions clinically staged as having minimal submucosal invasion if differentiated and ≤ 30 mm; or for malignant lesions clinically staged as intramucosal, undifferentiated and ≤ 20 mm; and in both cases with no ulcerative findings.ESGE/EHMSG/ESP recommends patient management based on the following histological risk after endoscopic resection: Curative/very low-risk resection (lymph node metastasis [LNM] risk < 0.5 %-1 %): en bloc R0 resection; dysplastic/pT1a, differentiated lesion, no lymphovascular invasion, independent of size if no ulceration and ≤ 30 mm if ulcerated. No further staging procedure or treatment is recommended.Curative/low-risk resection (LNM risk < 3 %): en bloc R0 resection; lesion with no lymphovascular invasion and: a) pT1b, invasion ≤ 500 µm, differentiated, size ≤ 30 mm; or b) pT1a, undifferentiated, size ≤ 20 mm and no ulceration. Staging should be completed, and further treatment is generally not necessary, but a multidisciplinary discussion is required. Local-risk resection (very low risk of LNM but increased risk of local persistence/recurrence): Piecemeal resection or tumor-positive horizontal margin of a lesion otherwise meeting curative/very low-risk criteria (or meeting low-risk criteria provided that there is no submucosal invasive tumor at the resection margin in the case of piecemeal resection or tumor-positive horizontal margin for pT1b lesions [invasion ≤ 500 µm; well-differentiated; size ≤ 30 mm, and VM0]). Endoscopic surveillance/re-treatment is recommended rather than other additional treatment. High-risk resection (noncurative): Any lesion with any of the following: (a) a positive vertical margin (if carcinoma) or lymphovascular invasion or deep submucosal invasion (> 500 µm from the muscularis mucosae); (b) poorly differentiated lesions if ulceration or size > 20 mm; (c) pT1b differentiated lesions with submucosal invasion ≤ 500 µm with size > 30 mm; or (d) intramucosal ulcerative lesion with size > 30 mm. Complete staging and strong consideration for additional treatments (surgery) in multidisciplinary discussion.ESGE/EHMSG/ESP suggest the use of validated endoscopic classifications of atrophy (e. g. Kimura-Takemoto) or intestinal metaplasia (e. g. endoscopic grading of gastric intestinal metaplasia [EGGIM]) to endoscopically stage precancerous conditions and stratify the risk for gastric cancer.ESGE/EHMSG/ESP recommend that biopsies should be taken from at least two topographic sites (2 biopsies from the antrum/incisura and 2 from the corpus, guided by VCE) in two separate, clearly labeled vials. Additional biopsy from the incisura is optional.ESGE/EHMSG/ESP recommend that patients with extensive endoscopic changes (Kimura C3 + or EGGIM 5 +) or advanced histological stages of atrophic gastritis (severe atrophic changes or intestinal metaplasia, or changes in both antrum and corpus, operative link on gastritis assessment/operative link on gastric intestinal metaplasia [OLGA/OLGIM] III/IV) should be followed up with high quality endoscopy every 3 years, irrespective of the individual's country of origin.ESGE/EHMSG/ESP recommend that no surveillance is proposed for patients with mild to moderate atrophy or intestinal metaplasia restricted to the antrum, in the absence of endoscopic signs of extensive lesions or other risk factors (family history, incomplete intestinal metaplasia, persistent H. pylori infection). This group constitutes most individuals found in clinical practice.ESGE/EHMSG/ESP recommend H. pylori eradication for patients with precancerous conditions and after endoscopic or surgical therapy.ESGE/EHMSG/ESP recommend that patients should be advised to stop smoking and low-dose daily aspirin use may be considered for the prevention of gastric cancer in selected individuals with high risk for cardiovascular events.

While Helicobacter pylori ( H . pylori ) infection is common in patients with gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma, there are still individuals who test negative for it. The proportion and characteristics of these patients remain unclear.

We conducted a systematic search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for relevant articles. Using a random-effects model, we performed a meta-analysis to assess the pooled proportion of gastric MALT lymphoma patients with negative H. pylori tests. In addition, we compared characteristics between gastric MALT lymphoma patients with and without H. pylori infection to examine clinical features in H. pylori -negative cases.

A total of 50 studies involving 6,033 patients were included. The overall proportion of gastric MALT lymphoma patients with negative H. pylori tests was 20.5% (95% confidence interval: 17.0%-24.6%). This rate exhibited an increasing trend over the years, particularly in non-Asian countries and in studies published after 2013, as well as in cases with sample sizes exceeding 100 patients, in male individuals, and among those with proximal or multiple lesions, nonsuperficial type morphology, submucosal invasion, and advanced clinical staging. Compared with H. pylori -positive patients, those who tested negative were more likely to be male, have proximal lesions, exhibit submucosal invasion, and present with an advanced clinical stage.

This study provides comprehensive information on the proportion and characteristics of H. pylori -negative gastric MALT lymphoma cases, highlighting the need for future clinical attention to treatment and surveillance in this patient population.

This study aimed to evaluate the long-term prognosis of patients with gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma, including overall survival (OS), remission, and factors associated with an aggressive disease course.

Medical records of 153 patients diagnosed with gastric MALT lymphoma between 2013 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients experiencing relapse, progression, high-grade transformation, or residual diseasewere included in the aggressive group and were compared with those in the indolent group. Additionally, the endoscopic findings of Helicobacter pylori-negative patients were reviewed.

Patient characteristics were as follows: mean age (56.9±11.2 years), sex (male, 51.0%), H. pylori infection (positive, 79.7%), endoscopic location (distal, 89.5%), endoscopic feature (superficial, 89.5%), clinical stage (stage I, 92.8%), invasion depth by endoscopic ultrasound (mucosa, n=115, 75.7%), and bone marrow result (no involvement, n=77, 100.0%). The median follow-up period was 59 months (mean, 61; range, 36-124) and the continuous remission period (n=149) was 51 months (mean, 50; range, 3-112). The 5-year survival rate was 97.7% while the 5-year continuous remission was 88.3%. Factors associated with the patients in the aggressive group were old age, sex(male), and clinical stage II or higher. H. pylori-negative patients' endoscopy revealed a high incidence of atrophic gastritis in the antrum.

The long-term prognosis of gastric MALT lymphoma appears indolent and is indicated by the 5-year OS and continuous remission rates. Aggressive disease courses are associated with old age, sex (male), and clinical stage II or higher, but are not related to OS.

The objective of this study is to explore the clinicopathological characteristics of gastric cancer and precancerous conditions in patients with primary gastric lymphoma.

We analyzed 474 cases of primary gastric lymphoma, mainly DLBCL and MALT, from three clinical centres retrospectively, and compared the clinicopathological parameters of primary gastric lymphoma patients complicated with gastric cancer, precancerous conditions, or with no complications.

A total of 5.1% of the patients with primary gastric lymphoma were diagnosed with gastric cancer, including metachronous gastric adenocarcinoma (3.2%) and synchronous gastric adenocarcinoma (1.9%). Of the patients with gastric lymphoma, 14.6% had precancerous conditions including atrophy (14.6%), intestinal metaplasia (8.9%), and low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (1.9%). Primary gastric lymphoma patients with an ulcerative type (p = 0.009) and Lugano classification stage IIE + IV (p < 0.001) lymphoma had a higher risk of complicating with gastric cancers or precancerous conditions. The rate of infection of Helicobacter pylori (Hp) was 68.4% in patients with primary gastric lymphoma, which was higher in patients with MALT lymphoma (p < 0.001), Lugano classification stage I + II (p < 0.001), and patients complicated with precancerous conditions and gastric cancer (p < 0.001), especially gastric cancer of the intestinal type (p = 0.04). Gastric cancer (95.8%) and precancerous conditions (91.3%) occurred mostly in Hp-infected primary gastric lymphoma patients, with a minor subset of Hp-eradicated patients. Primary gastric lymphoma patients had a higher detection rate of early gastric cancer (25.0%) and a five-year survival rate (40.0%) than the general Chinese population.

Patients with primary gastric lymphoma have a high risk of developing gastric cancer and precancerous conditions, and this risk may be related to Helicobacter pylori infection. Follow-up of primary gastric lymphoma provides an opportunity for the detection of early gastric cancer.Key messages5.1% of the patients with primary gastric lymphoma were diagnosed with gastric cancer.14.6% of the patients with gastric lymphoma had premalignant lesions including atrophy (14.6%), intestinal metaplasia (8.9%), and low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (1.9%).Primary gastric lymphoma patients complicating with gastric cancer had a higher infection rate of Helicobacter pylori (100.0%), a detection rate of early gastric cancer (25.0%) and a five-year survival rate (40.0%) than the general Chinese population.

Gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphomas (GML) are non-Hodgkin lymphomas arising from the marginal zone of the lymphoid tissue of the stomach. They are usually induced by chronic infection with Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori); however, H. pylori-negative GML is of increasing incidence. The diagnosis of GML is based on histological examination of gastric biopsies, but the role of upper endoscopy is crucial since it is the first step in the diagnostic process and, with currently available novel endoscopic techniques, may even allow an in vivo diagnosis of GML per se. The treatment of GML, which is usually localized, always includes the eradication of H. pylori, which should be performed even in H. pylori-negative GML. In the case of GML persistence after eradication of the bacteria, low-dose radiotherapy may be proposed, while systemic treatments (immunochemotherapy) should be reserved for very rare disseminated cases. In GML patients, at diagnosis but even after complete remission, special attention must be paid to an increased risk of gastric adenocarcinoma, especially in the presence of associated gastric precancerous lesions (gastric atrophy and gastric intestinal metaplasia), which requires adequate endoscopic surveillance of these patients.

Increasingly extranodal marginal B-cell lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue, known as mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma, is a type of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. The prognosis of primary gastric MALT (GML) patients can be affected by many factors. Clinical risk factors, including age, type of therapy, sex, stage and family hematologic malignancy history, also have significant effects on the development of the disease. The available data are mainly focused on epidemiology; in contrast, few studies have investigated the prognostic variables for overall survival (OS) in patients with primary GML. Based on the realities above, we searched a large amount of data on patients diagnosed with primary GML in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. The aim was to develop and verify a survival nomogram model that can predict the overall survival prognosis of primary GML by combining prognostic and determinant variables.

To create an effective survival nomogram for patients with primary gastric GML.

All data of patients with primary GML from 2004 to 2015 were collected from the SEER database. The primary endpoint was OS. Based on the LASSO and COX regression, we created and further verified the accuracy and effectiveness of the survival nomogram model by the concordance index (C-index), calibration curve and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (td-ROC) curves.

A total of 2604 patients diagnosed with primary GML were selected for this study. A total of 1823 and 781 people were randomly distributed into the training and testing sets at a ratio of 7:3. The median follow-up of all patients was 71 mo, and the 3- and 5-year OS rates were 87.2% and 79.8%, respectively. Age, sex, race, Ann Arbor stage and radiation were independent risk factors for OS of primary GML (all P < 0.05). The C-index values of the nomogram were 0.751 (95%CI: 0.729-0.773) and 0.718 (95%CI: 0.680-0.757) in the training and testing cohorts, respectively, showing the good discrimination ability of the nomogram model. Td-ROC curves and calibration plots also indicated satisfactory predictive power and good agreement of the model. Overall, the nomogram shows favorable performance in discriminating and predicting the OS of patients with primary GML.

A nomogram was developed and validated to have good survival predictive performance based on five clinical independent risk factors for OS for patients with primary GML. Nomograms are a low-cost and convenient clinical tool in assessing individualized prognosis and treatment for patients with primary GML.

Gastric cancer is the fifth most common malignancy and the third highest cancer-related mortality worldwide after lung and colorectal cancers. The gastric carcinogenesis is started with precancerous lesion. Prompt diagnosis and management of gastric precancerous lesion may prevent disease progression. Midkine is a growth factor associated with various cancers and proposed as a marker for detecting gastric precancerous lesion.

The aim of the study is to determine the association between serum midkine level and gastric precancerous lesion in patients with gastritis.

A cross sectional study was conducted at Haji Adam Malik general hospital. Subjects were obtained by consecutive sampling. Inclusion criteria were patients aged 18 years or older, diagnosed with gastritis from gastroscopy and histopathology results, and willing to cooperate in the study. Each subjects underwent interview and endoscopic examination. Serum midkine level was determined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method. Chi square, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and logistic regression tests were applied.

A total of 160 subjects were enrolled with 29.4% had gastric precancerous lesion. Serum midkine level was associated with gastric premalignant lesion. Cut off point for serum midkine level was 252 pg/mL with area under the curve of 0.816 (p<0.001). It's sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in diagnosing gastric precancerous lesion were 74.5%, 71.7%, and 72.5%, respectively. Helicobacter pylori infection, high serum midkine level, heavy alcohol drinker, and family history of gastric cancer were risk factors for gastric precancerous lesion.

Serum midkine level is associated with gastric premalignant lesion in patients with gastritis and has good diagnostic values.

Approximately one-third of extranodal non-Hodgkin lymphomas involve the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, with the vast majority being diagnosed in the stomach, duodenum, or proximal small intestine. A few entities, especially diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and extranodal marginal zone lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue, represent the majority of cases. In addition, there are diseases specific to or characteristic of the GI tract, and any type of systemic lymphoma can present in or disseminate to these organs. The recent advances in the genetic and molecular characterisation of lymphoid neoplasms have translated into notable changes in the classification of primary GI T-cell neoplasms and the recommended diagnostic approach to aggressive B-cell tumours. In many instances, diagnoses rely on morphology and immunophenotype, but there is an increasing need to incorporate molecular genetic markers. Moreover, it is also important to take into consideration the endoscopic and clinical presentations. This review gives an update on the most recent developments in the pathology and molecular pathology of upper GI lymphoproliferative diseases.

Gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma is a rare disease, and most available data on gastric MALT lymphoma (GML) come from clinical studies of selected patients treated in centres of excellence.

To analyse the clinical features, management and survival of GML patients in a population-based study in France METHODS: All new cases of GML diagnosed between 2002 and 2010 in 11 French areas covered by cancer registries were included. Pathology reports were verified and, if necessary, reviewed by an expert pathologist. All clinical data were retrospectively collected from medical files and analysed using stata V. 14 software.

Four hundred and sixteen patients with confirmed GML (50% male, median age 67 years) were identified. Among them, 44 showed an early transformation into diffuse large B cell lymphoma and were considered to have had an initially missed high-grade lymphoma. At diagnosis, 76% of patients were at stage IE/II, and 24% at stage III/IV of the disease. Helicobacter pylori infection was found in 57% of the patients. Eradication treatment was administered to 76% of patients and complete remission (CR) was obtained in 39%. One hundred and ninety patients received at least one other treatment, including 10 already in CR after eradication. Altogether, CR was obtained in 70% of patients and the 5-year overall survival was 79% (95% CI [75-83]).

In comparison to clinical series, in the general population, GMLs are more frequently diagnosed at an advanced stage, their clinical management is heterogeneous, and there is a risk of misdiagnosis and overtreatment. These results highlight the necessity of following currently available guidelines in this field.

Gastric cancer (GC) is still the third leading cause of cancer death in both sexes worldwide. Helicobacter pylori infection is the most important risk factor for GC and, in spite of the consistent trend of a decreasing incidence, in 2015 approximately 4.4 billion individuals-more than half the world's population-were infected with H. pylori. The birth cohort pattern of decreased H. pylori infection reported in a systematic review contributes to explain the declining GC mortality in Japan. Current trends in estimated annual percentage change of GC incidence foreshadow expected reversals in both falling incidence and male predominance among US non-Hispanic whites. Combining serum pepsinogen 1 and H. pylori serology was shown to be useful for GC risk stratification in a Finnish population. Gastritis staging by operative link on gastritis assessment was confirmed to be reliable in predicting GC risk in a large prospective study. In a randomized trial from South Korea, H. pylori eradication therapy significantly reduced the rates of metachronous GC in patients who received curative endoscopic resection for early GC. A study based on a territory-wide health care database of the Hong Kong Hospital Authority showed that aspirin use is associated with a reduced GC risk. Another study based on the same database showed that proton pump inhibitors increase GC risk, but methodological biases have most likely acted as confounders. Confirmatory data on the role of endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with early GC have been published. The phase III FLOT4 trial has shown that the FLOT triplet regimen (docetaxel, oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil) improves the outcome of patients with GC and locoregional disease as compared to the ECF triplet (epirubicin, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil). In the phase III ATTRACTION-2 trial, nivolumab was shown to be an effective treatment option with a relative safe profile for heavily pretreated patients with advanced GC.