Lymph node metastasis, particularly to extraperigastric lymph nodes, is an important issue in determining the suitability of minimally invasive treatment for early gastric cancer. However, there is a paucity of research focused on identifying risk factors for extraperigastric lymph node metastasis, which is crucial for optimizing treatment selection.

Patients who underwent radical gastrectomy for early gastric cancer between 2007 and 2023 at Korea University Guro Hospital and Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gandong in Seoul, Korea, were reviewed retrospectively. We compared clinicopathologic characteristics to find out risk factors for lymph node metastasis between the no lymph node metastasis, perigastric lymph node metastasis, and extraperigastric lymph node metastasis groups.

A total of 1,021 patients were included in the study, with 90.0% in the lymph node metastasis, 7.94% in perigastric lymph node metastasis, and 2.06% in extraperigastric lymph node metastasis groups. Clinicopathologic analysis revealed the lymph node metastasis group exhibited a greater prevalence of mucosal lesions (55.2%), whereas the perigastric lymph node metastasis and extraperigastric lymph node metastasis groups demonstrated a greater incidence of SM3 invasion (55.6% and 52.4%, respectively; P < .001). Lymphatic invasion were found to be significantly different among the groups (P < .001). Multinomial logistic regression identified lymphatic invasion as a sole significant risk factor for the perigastric lymph node metastasis and extraperigastric lymph node metastasis groups. The 5-year relapse-free survival rates were 99.0% (lymph node metastasis), 94.5% (perigastric lymph node metastasis), and 100% (extraperigastric lymph node metastasis) (P = .011).

This multicenter retrospective analysis indicates that lymphatic invasion is the primary independent predictor of extraperigastric lymph node metastasis in patients with early gastric cancer. Future prospective research is warranted to validate this result and establish guidelines for treatment decision-making for early gastric cancer.

The incidence of early onset gastric cancer(EOGC) is increasing. However, few studies have focused on early onset early stage gastric cancer(EEGC). The aim of this study was to determine the threshold age of patients with EOGC, identify the clinicopathological characteristics associated with lymph node metastasis(LNM) in EEGC, and develop a predictive model for LNM in EEGC.

A retrospective cohort study was conducted, including 1765 patients with early-stage gastric cancer. Logistic inflection point and stratified analysis were used to determine the threshold age. 266 patients met the criteria for EEGC and were included for further analysis. The patients were divided into two groups for the purposes of the study: a training dataset and an external validation dataset. The division of patients into these two groups was conducted in accordance with the time of surgery, with the ratio of patients in each group being approximately 7:3.Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to identify LNM risk factors. A predictive nomogram was developed and validated using calibration plots and the area under the curve (AUC).The constructed logistic regression model was then validated using the external validation dataset.

The threshold age for EOGC was determined to be 45 years. Of the 266 patients with EEGC, 20.7% had LNM. Tumor maximum diameter and lymphovascular invasion were identified as independent risk factors for LNM. The nomogram demonstrated high predictive accuracy, with an AUC of 0.809.

This study demonstrated that tumor maximum diameter and lymphovascular invasion were independent risk factors for LNM in EEGC. The predictive nomogram showed promising accuracy and might assist in identifying patients at higher risk of LNM, potentially informing treatment strategies. Given the relatively high LNM rate, endoscopic submucosal dissection may not be suitable for EEGC patients. Further large-scale multicenter studies are needed to deepen the understanding of this population and to confirm these findings.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a minimally invasive treatment for early gastric cancer; additional treatment may be recommended for patients in whom resection is not curative per the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines. The aim of this study was to assess treatment outcomes of ESD for gastric neoplasia, with a focus on cases of non-curative resection.

This was a retrospective study of all individuals undergoing ESD for the treatment of gastric adenocarcinoma or dysplasia in a high-volume tertiary care center in the United States. Data on patient demographic characteristics, clinical history, lesion characteristics, and procedural and clinical outcomes were collected from the electronic medical record.

Among 82 cases undergoing ESD for the management of gastric neoplasia, 32 cases resulted in non-curative resection. 20 of these non-curative cases did not get additional treatment, among which recurrence occurred in two cases with positive horizontal margins only. These patients did not show lymph node metastasis and underwent further endoscopic or surgical resection. There was no recurrence in 11 cases with undifferentiated carcinomas of ≤2 cm in size.

Although this study was limited by its retrospective design, small sample size, and follow-up duration, our findings suggest that a risk-adapted strategy could be employed for certain patients undergoing non-curative ESD per American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines, with close follow-up instead of routine surgery in select cases with favorable features. Further studies are needed to refine the criteria for additional treatment after non-curative ESD in Western populations.

The novel curability criteria for elderly (EL) patients have been proposed to stratify their risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM), following non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer (EGC). Hence, this study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the EL criteria and compare them with those of the well-known eCura system.

A retrospective analysis was performed on 143 patients who did not meet the curative ESD criteria at a tertiary hospital in Korea between 2011 and 2022. Of these, 102 underwent additional surgery, while 41 were followed up without further treatment. The LNM rates based on the EL and eCura systems were stratified and compared.

In the surgery group, 29.4% (30/102) patients were classified as EL-low (EL-L) and 70.2% (72/102) as EL-high (EL-H). The LNM rates (95% confidence interval) were 0.0% (0.0-11.6) and 9.7% (4.0-19.0) for EL-L and EL-H, respectively (P=0.102). EL-L was closely aligned with the eCura low-risk category, with a similar patient proportion (32.4%) and an LNM rate of 0.0% (0.0-10.6). The eCura system classified 94.1% (48/51) of the EL-L patients as low-risk, with an 86% concordance rate (123/143). Discordant cases included patients with positive vertical margins, but without other risk factors, who were classified as EL-H without LNM.

Patients with EL-L showed no LNM, and the EL criteria demonstrated high concordance with the eCura system. The EL criteria may be as effective as the eCura system in identifying low-risk patients after non-curative ESD for EGC.

Recent advances in endoscopic equipment have improved the diagnosis of gastrointestinal tumors. Image-enhanced endoscopy, including narrow-band imaging, blue light imaging, and linked color imaging, has unified magnifying observation classification methods and significantly improved the qualitative and quantitative diagnostic performance of gastrointestinal epithelial tumors. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), a minimally invasive treatment for early-stage gastrointestinal cancer, is widely used. The aging population in Japan has been gradually increasing. Despite this, ESD has shown good outcomes in older adults. However, long-term prognostic analyses should take into account the high mortality rate from other illnesses. Prognostic indicators such as the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and the Prognostic Nutrition Index (PNI) should be used to determine whether ESD should be performed. Even in cases of noncurative resection, follow-up without additional surgical resection is an option if there are other comorbidities that affect the prognosis.

Objectives: The accurate prediction of lymph node metastasis (LNM) and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) is crucial for determining treatment strategies for early gastric cancer (EGC). This study aimed to develop and validate a deep learning-based clinical decision support system (CDSS) to predict LNM including LVI in EGC using real-world data. Methods: A deep learning-based CDSS was developed by integrating endoscopic images, demographic data, biopsy pathology, and CT findings from the data of 2927 patients with EGC across five institutions. We compared a transformer-based model to an image-only (basic convolutional neural network (CNN)) model and a multimodal classification (CNN with random forest) model. Internal testing was conducted on 449 patients from the five institutions, and external validation was performed on 766 patients from two other institutions. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), probability density function, and clinical utility curve. Results: In the training, internal, and external validation cohorts, LNM/LVI was observed in 379 (12.95%), 49 (10.91%), 15 (9.09%), and 41 (6.82%) patients, respectively. The transformer-based model achieved an AUC of 0.9083, sensitivity of 85.71%, and specificity of 90.75%, outperforming the CNN (AUC 0.5937) and CNN with random forest (AUC 0.7548). High sensitivity and specificity were maintained in internal and external validations. The transformer model distinguished 91.8% of patients with LNM in the internal validation dataset, and 94.0% and 89.1% in the two different external datasets. Conclusions: We propose a deep learning-based CDSS for predicting LNM/LVI in EGC by integrating real-world data, potentially guiding treatment strategies in clinical settings.

The treatment of early gastric cancer (EGC) is contingent upon the status of lymph node metastasis (LNM). Accurate preoperative prediction of LNM is critical for reducing unnecessary surgeries. This study seeks to evaluate the risk factors for LNM in submucosal EGC and develop a predictive model to optimize therapeutic decision-making.

A retrospective analysis was performed on clinical data from 389 patients with T1b-stage EGC who underwent radical gastrectomy. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify independent risk factors, followed by the development of a nomogram to predict LNM. The model's efficacy was validated through receiver operating characteristic curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis.

Of the 389 patients, 77 had LNM. Logistic regression analysis identified gender, CA199 levels, tumor location, degree of differentiation, presence of ulcers, and lymph node enlargement on CT as independent risk factors for LNM. A nomogram was constructed to assess the risk of LNM, demonstrating strong predictive accuracy with an area under the curve of 0.82 in the training set and 0.74 in the validation set, along with good sensitivity and positive predictive value.

This study presents a reliable preoperative nomogram to estimate the likelihood of LNM in submucosal EGC, providing valuable guidance for determining the most effective treatment strategies for patients.

Early-stage, poorly differentiated, non-ampullary duodenal adenocarcinomas are rare, and their clinicopathological features remain unelucidated. Between September 2006 and April 2022, 205 consecutive patients underwent endoscopic or surgical resection for early-stage non-ampullary duodenal adenocarcinomas at our hospital. There were no cases of poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma among the 188 cases of mucosal carcinoma. Meanwhile, among the 17 cases of submucosal invasive carcinoma, four cases were poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas. Herein, we report four cases of these carcinomas. All four lesions were reddish in color and were located on the oral side of the papilla. The gross types were either protruded (0-I) or mixed, elevated, and depressed (0-IIa + IIc). During preoperative diagnosis, submucosal invasion was suspected in all lesions, and biopsies were performed. Based on histological analyses of biopsy specimens, a diagnosis of poorly differentiated or signet-ring cell components was made in all cases, and a pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed. The median tumor size was 6.5 (range, 5-12) mm, and all lesions were poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas with submucosal invasion and lymph node metastasis. Regarding the tumor immunophenotype, one and three cases exhibited gastric and mixed gastrointestinal phenotypes, respectively. Two patients experienced metastatic recurrence; one of them died from the primary disease.

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in both Korea and worldwide. Since 2004, the Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer have been regularly updated, with the 4th edition published in 2022. The 4th edition was the result of a collaborative work by an interdisciplinary team, including experts in gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology, and guideline development methodology. The current guideline is the 5th version, an updated version of the 4th edition. In this guideline, 6 key questions (KQs) were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group, and 7 statements were developed, or revised, or discussed based on a systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed database. Over the past 2 years, there have been significant changes in systemic treatment, leading to major updates and revisions focused on this area. Additionally, minor modifications have been made in other sections, incorporating recent research findings. The level of evidence and grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Key factors for recommendation included the level of evidence, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability. The working group reviewed and discussed the recommendations to reach a consensus. The structure of this guideline remains similar to the 2022 version. Earlier sections cover general considerations, such as screening, diagnosis, and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. In the latter sections, statements are provided for each KQ based on clinical evidence, with flowcharts supporting these statements through meta-analysis and references. This multidisciplinary, evidence-based gastric cancer guideline aims to support clinicians in providing optimal care for gastric cancer patients.

This article provides an overview of recent advances in endoscopic resection techniques. It includes the brief overview of endoscopic submucosal dissection, regional differences in ESD indications, innovation of ESD techniques, and expansion to full-thickness resection. The article covers cold snare polypectomy for small polyps with tips, underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (U-EMR) for sessile lesions with tips and expanding role of U-EMR, and the key assistive techniques for ESD that have improved the safety and efficacy. Furthermore, it discusses the emerging field of endoscopic full-thickness resection including device-assisted and freehand exposure techniques.

Background: Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) has become the standard therapy for early malignant lesions in the gastrointestinal tract and has shown as good oncological surgery results. Approximately 30% of ESDs do not meet the criteria for oncological curability, and upfront surgery is indicated. Hence, about 40% of patients with an indication for surgery are advised against surgery because of comorbidities and an advanced age. Methods: We performed a multicenter retrospective cohort study on the long-term outcomes of non-curative ESDs, performed between 2009 and May 2024, without additional tumor therapy. The primary outcome was the recurrence of malignancy, either local malignancy or lymph node metastasis during follow-up, or death. We compared the outcomes between two cohorts: after non-curative ESD (ncESD) and after curative ESD (cESD). Results: A total of 374 ESDs were analyzed in this study. Overall, the technical success rate was 91%, and the oncological curative resection criteria were met in 70.9% of patients. Severe complications occurred in 5% of cases without procedure-associated mortality. In the ncESD group, 20% (7/35) of patients had a recurrence of malignancy primarily due to positive horizontal margins in the resection specimens, and 3 out of 35 died due to a non-oncological reason during the follow-up (mean length 36.6 months). In the cESD group, 3% (1/33) of patients had tumor recurrence, and 1 patient died because of a non-oncological reason. The tumor recurrence rate between the cohorts was significant (p = 0.017), and overall mortality did not show significance (p = 0.33). Conclusions: Especially in the elderly and multimorbid patients, the recommendation to perform rescue surgery after non-curative ESD remains challenging. Residual malignancy rates in surgical resection specimens are low, recurrence rates of malignancy are low, and mortality rates for non-oncological reasons are high in this population. There is a need for more data for the individualization of patient management after non-curative ESD.

To analyze the diagnostic efficiency of the four absolute endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) indications for lymph node metastasis (LNM) of Chinese patients with early gastric cancer (EGC).

We retrospectively analyzed EGC patients who underwent radical D2 gastrectomy from January 2019 to December 2022. We evaluated the rate of LNM, false-negative rate, and negative predictive value of the four ESD indications.

Of enrolled 2722 EGC patients, 388 (14.3%) patients presented LNM. Tumor size > 2 cm, ulceration, submucosal invasion, undifferentiated type, and lymphovascular invasion were independent risk factors of LNM in patients with EGC. 1062 (39%) cases of EGC conformed to the four EDS indications; however, 4% of them had LNM. 451 cases were fully in accord with the fourth ESD indication (undifferentiated intramucosal carcinoma without ulceration and a maximum lesion diameter of ≤ 2 cm), and 35 of them had LNM, with a false-negative rate (FNR) of 9.02% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 92.24%. There was significant difference among the four indications in terms of the rate of LNM (1.0% vs 1.5% vs 1.3% vs 7.8%, P < 0.001), FNR (1.03% vs 0.52% vs 0.26% vs 9.02%, P < 0.001), and NPV (98.99% vs 98.53% vs 98.75% vs 92.24%, P < 0.001).

Overall, the fourth ESD indication was associated with a high rate of LNM compared to the other three indications. Thus, it might not be safe to classify it as an absolute indication in Chinese patients with EGC.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) plays a pivotal role in treating early gastric cancer (EGC). Some patients require additional gastrectomy because of non-curative ESD. This study aimed to analyze the clinical factors associated with non-curative ESD and to re-evaluate the role of ESD according to its indication criteria. Altogether, 134 patients who had undergone additional gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy for non-curative ESD based on the pathological results of ESD specimens were included. Their data including pre-ESD diagnosis, reasons for requesting additional gastrectomy, and surgical outcomes were analyzed retrospectively. Of the 134 patients with EGC in the final pathology of ESD specimens, 56 underwent staging ESD for a diagnostic approach, of whom 28 were diagnosed with atypical glands and 28 with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) prior to ESD. The remaining 78 patients of the 134 were identified to have EGC and received ESD for therapy. Based on the pathological results of ESD specimens, additional gastrectomy was commissioned with non-curative ESD because of one or more causes such as deep submucosal invasion, lymphatic invasion, positive vertical margin, undifferentiated histology, positive lateral margin, and venous invasion. Regarding surgical specimens, 13 patients had lymph node metastasis (LNM) and 9 had local residual tumor; one of them had both LNM and a local residual tumor. In patients with atypical glands, 4 had LNM and 3 had a local residual tumor; one of them had both LNM and a local residual tumor, and then died of multiple organ metastasis. In patients with HGD, 4 had LNM and 1 had a local residual tumor. Additionally, 4 patients who were absolutely indicated for ESD had LNM, of whom 2 had atypical glands, and the other 2 had HGD. Similarly, in 6 patients with a local residual tumor absolutely indicated for ESD, 2 had atypical glands and 1 had HGD. Positive vertical margin, lymphatic invasion, and deep submucosal invasion were identified as independent risk factors for LNM. ESD may play diagnostic and therapeutic roles in determining the optimal treatment of EGC when the diagnosis is equivocal or insufficient in endoscopic assessments for gastric cancer screening.

Gastric cancer (GC) is the fifth most frequently diagnosed cancer and the fifth most common cause of cancer death in the world. Regarding the age at which the diagnosis was made, GC is divided into early-onset gastric cancer (EOGC-up to 45 years of age) and conventional GC (older than 45). EOGC constitutes approximately 10% of all GCs. Numerous reports indicate that EOGC is more aggressive than conventional GC and is often discovered at an advanced tumor stage, which has an impact on the five-year survival rate. The median survival rate for advanced-stage GC is very poor, amounting to less than 12 months. Risk factors for GC include family history, alcohol consumption, smoking, Helicobacter pylori, and Epstein-Barr virus infection. It has been shown that a proper diet and lifestyle can play a preventive role in GC. However, research indicates that risk factors for conventional GC are less correlated with EOGC. In addition, the unclear etiology of EOGC and the late diagnosis of this disease limit the possibilities of effective treatment. Genetic factors are considered a likely cause of EOGC, as young patients are less exposed to environmental carcinogens. Research characterizing GC in young patients is scarce. This comprehensive study presents all aspects: epidemiology, risk factors, new treatment strategies, and future directions.

Accurate prediction of pathologic results for early gastric cancer (EGC) based on endoscopic findings is essential in deciding between endoscopic and surgical resection. This study aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) model to assess comprehensive pathologic characteristics of EGC using white-light endoscopic images and videos.

To train the model, we retrospectively collected 4,336 images and prospectively included 153 videos from patients with EGC who underwent endoscopic or surgical resection. The performance of the model was tested and compared to that of 16 endoscopists (nine experts and seven novices) using a mutually exclusive set of 260 images and 10 videos. Finally, we conducted external validation using 436 images and 89 videos from another institution.

After training, the model achieved predictive accuracies of 89.7% for undifferentiated histology, 88.0% for submucosal invasion, 87.9% for lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and 92.7% for lymph node metastasis (LNM), using endoscopic videos. The area under the curve values of the model were 0.992 for undifferentiated histology, 0.902 for submucosal invasion, 0.706 for LVI, and 0.680 for LNM in the test. In addition, the model showed significantly higher accuracy than the experts in predicting undifferentiated histology (92.7% vs. 71.6%), submucosal invasion (87.3% vs. 72.6%), and LNM (87.7% vs. 72.3%). The external validation showed accuracies of 75.6% and 71.9% for undifferentiated histology and submucosal invasion, respectively.

AI may assist endoscopists with high predictive performance for differentiation status and invasion depth of EGC. Further research is needed to improve the detection of LVI and LNM.

The Cancer Control Act requires the maintenance of regional cooperation pathways (RCP) for cancer treatment. In 2008, we started RCP for early detection of new gastric cancer after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). In gastric cancer treatment, RCP after surgical resection had been widely used, but little is known about RCP after ESD. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of RCP after ESD.

This study included 465 patients on whom our RCP was implemented from 2008 to 2018. A regional family physician performed surveillance endoscopy at 3 months and 1 year after ESD and annually thereafter. We retrospectively evaluated the cumulative incidence and treatment outcomes of new gastric cancer and compared them with previous reports.

During a median follow-up period of 70.5 months (3-120 months), 58 patients developed new gastric cancers, and metachronous gastric cancer was detected in 55 patients more than 1 year after ESD. The 5-year cumulative incidence rate was 9.8%. Three patients did not want treatment. Among the remaining 55 patients, the initial treatment was ESD in 51 and surgical resection in 4. Eventually, 50 patients (48 in the ESD group and 2 in the surgical resection group) fulfilled the pathologic criteria for curative ESD. There were no deaths due to gastric cancer.

Our study was the first to reveal the incidence of new gastric cancer after ESD using RCP. Most lesions were cured with ESD, and no patients died of gastric cancer. Therefore, we consider RCPs to be an option for surveillance after ESD.

When treating undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer (UD-EGC) that is limited to the mucosa (clinically T1a), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) can be considered if the tumor is 2 cm or less and is not ulcerated. However, there is insufficient evidence to determine the relationships between tumor size and oncological safety of ESD in UD-EGC.

The pathology reports of Korean patients who were diagnosed with UD-EGC (n = 5286) were retrospectively reviewed. The cumulative incidence of lymph node metastasis (LNM) according to tumor size was evaluated in subgroups. The tumor-size cut-off was identified as the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of cumulative LNM incidence that did not exceed 1.0%.

We identified 1516 patients with non-ulcerated T1a tumors ≤2 cm in size. Among patients without lymphatic invasion, 1.5% (95% CI 0.91-2.16%) had LNM. In patients with poorly differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma (PD), LNM increased from 0 to 0.74% based on a tumor size of 1.0 cm. Regardless of tumor size, smaller percentages of undifferentiated-type (UD) and poorly cohesive carcinoma (PCC) patients experienced LNM than did those with PD. In non-ulcerated mucosal cancer without lymphatic invasion and tumor size ≤0.9 cm, no LNM was observed in patients with UD (95% CI 0-0.53%), PCC (95% CI 0-0.59%), or PD (95% CI 0-0.86%) histologic type.

In patients diagnosed with non-ulcerated T1a UD-EGC, ESD can be performed if the tumor size is 0.9 cm or less, regardless of histologic type.

Although endoscopic forceps biopsy is the gold standard for early gastric cancer (EGC) diagnosis, the method can cause endoscopic resection of specimens and histological discrepancies. This study aims to examine the risk factors for histological discrepancies in EGC and long-term clinical outcomes. This retrospective study included patients diagnosed with differentiated-type EGC using forceps biopsy. Patients without histological discrepancies and with undifferentiated types in endoscopic resection histology were categorized into the concordant and discordant groups, respectively. Clinical characteristics and long-term outcomes related to histological discrepancies were analyzed. A total of 957 lesions from 936 patients were enrolled. An overall discrepancy rate of 8.7% was confirmed, with an undifferentiated-type discrepancy of 5.5%. The discordant group showed a higher tendency for lesions to be located in the upper third region, to have whitish discoloration, and to undergo a greater number of biopsies compared with the concordant group. Multivariate analysis confirmed that lesion location in the upper third region (odds ratio [OR]: 2.125; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.032-5.277; P = .041) and whitish surface discoloration (OR: 13.615; 95% CI: 6.028-28.728; P = .001) were significantly correlated with histologic discrepancy. Compared with the concordant group, the discordant group had a lower curative resection rate, but no differences were observed in complications, local recurrence, or survival rates. Upper third location and whitish discoloration were risk factors for the histologic discrepancy between differentiated and undifferentiated types in patients with EGC. For curative resections performed in patients with EGC and histologic discrepancies and without additional treatment, careful follow-up is possible.

Malignancies in the upper gastrointestinal tract are amenable to endoscopic resection at an early stage. Achieving a curative resection is the most stringent quality criterion, but post-resection risk assessment and aftercare are also part of a comprehensive quality program.

Various factors influence the achievement of curative resection. These include endoscopic assessment prior to resection using chromoendoscopy and HD technology. If resectability is possible, it is particularly important to delineate the lateral resection margins as precisely as possible before resection. Furthermore, the correct choice of resection technique depending on the lesion must be taken into account. Endoscopic submucosal dissection is the standard for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and gastric carcinoma. In Western countries, it is becoming increasingly popular to treat Barrett's neoplasia over 2 cm in size and/or with suspected submucosal infiltration with en bloc resection instead of piece meal resection. After resection, risk assessment based on the histopathological resection determines the patient's individual risk of lymph node metastases, particularly in the case of high-risk lesions. This is categorized according to the current literature.

This review presents clinical algorithms for endoscopic resection of esophageal SCC, Barrett's neoplasia, and gastric neoplasia. The algorithms include the pre-resection assessment of the lesion and the resection margins, the adequate resection technique for the respective lesion, as well as the post-resection risk assessment with an evidence-based recommendation for follow-up therapy and surveillance.

The original eCura system was designed to stratify the risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM) after endoscopic resection (ER) in patients with early gastric cancer (EGC). We assessed the effectiveness of a modified eCura system for reflecting the characteristics of undifferentiated-type (UD)-EGC.

Six hundred thirty-four patients who underwent non-curative ER for UD-EGC and received either additional surgery (radical surgery group; n=270) or no further treatment (no additional treatment group; n=364) from 18 institutions between 2005 and 2015 were retrospectively included in this study. The eCuraU system assigned 1 point each for tumors >20 mm in size, ulceration, positive vertical margin, and submucosal invasion <500 µm; 2 points for submucosal invasion ≥500 µm; and 3 points for lymphovascular invasion.

LNM rates in the radical surgery group were 1.1%, 5.4%, and 13.3% for the low- (0-1 point), intermediate- (2-3 points), and high-risk (4-8 points), respectively (P-for-trend<0.001). The eCuraU system showed a significantly higher probability of identifying patients with LNM as high-risk than the eCura system (66.7% vs. 22.2%; McNemar P<0.001). In the no additional treatment group, overall survival (93.4%, 87.2%, and 67.6% at 5 years) and cancer-specific survival (99.6%, 98.9%, and 92.9% at 5 years) differed significantly among the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk categories, respectively (both P<0.001). In the high-risk category, surgery outperformed no treatment in terms of overall mortality (hazard ratio, 3.26; P=0.015).

The eCuraU system stratified the risk of LNM in patients with UD-EGC after ER. It is strongly recommended that high-risk patients undergo additional surgery.

Background: This study aimed to assess the completion rate and postoperative bleeding incidence of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for gastric tumors under continuous antithrombotic therapy. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted including 88 patients with 100 gastric lesions who underwent gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and received continuous antithrombotic therapy. Additionally, retrospective data on gastric ESD in 479 patients with 534 lesions who did not receive antithrombotic therapy were collected for comparison. Results: The en bloc resection rates (100% in the continuous antithrombotic therapy group vs. 100% in the non-antithrombotic therapy group) and complete resection rates (97.0% vs. 96.3%, respectively) were high and comparable between the groups. No significant differences were found in the specimen size or procedure time. Perforation rates were low (0% vs. 2.3%, respectively) and were not significantly different between the groups. However, postoperative bleeding occurred significantly more frequently in the continuous antithrombotic therapy group (10.2% vs. 4.2%, respectively) than in the non-antithrombotic therapy group. The subgroup analysis revealed a higher incidence of postoperative bleeding in patients receiving thienopyridine derivatives. Conclusions: Continuous administration of antithrombotic agents, especially thienopyridines, increased the risk of postprocedural hemorrhage following gastric ESD. These findings support the need for careful consideration of pharamcological management before ESD, aligning with the current guidelines.

Since the indications for endoscopic submucosal dissection have been expanded to include undifferentiated-type early gastric cancers, improvements in preoperative diagnostic ability have been an area of research. There are also concerns about the impact on the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection. Based on our previous studies, in undifferentiated-type early gastric cancers, magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging is useful for delineating the demarcation regardless of the tumor size. Additionally, inflammatory cell infiltration appears to be a cause of misdiagnosis, suggesting that the resolution of inflammation could contribute to the accurate diagnosis of demarcations. As such, the accuracy of demarcation in eradicated and uninfected cases is higher than that in non-eradicated cases. The common features of the endoscopic findings were discoloration under white-light imaging and a predominance of sites in the lower and middle regions. The uninfected group was characterized by smaller tumor size, flat type, more extended intervening parts in magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging, and pure signet ring cell carcinoma. In contrast, the eradication and non-eradication groups were characterized by larger tumor size, depressed type, and wavy microvessels in magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging. In this comprehensive review, as described above, we discuss the diagnosis of demarcation of undifferentiated-type early gastric cancers, undifferentiated-type early gastric cancers that developed following H. pylori eradication, and H. pylori-uninfected undifferentiated-type early gastric cancers, with a focus on studies with self-examination and endoscopic findings and describe the future direction.

Endoscopic treatment, particularly endoscopic submucosal dissection, has become the primary treatment for early gastric cancer. A comprehensive optical assessment, including white light endoscopy, image-enhanced endoscopy, and magnification, are the cornerstones for clinical staging and determining the resectability of lesions. This paper discusses factors that influence the indication for endoscopic resection and the likelihood of achieving a curative resection. Our review stresses the critical need for interpreting the histopathological report in accordance with clinical guidelines and the imperative of tailoring decisions based on the patients' and lesions' characteristics and preferences. Moreover, we offer guidance on managing complex scenarios, such as those involving non-curative resection. Finally, we identify future research avenues, including the role of artificial intelligence in estimating the depth of invasion and the urgent need to refine predictive scores for lymph node metastasis and metachronous lesions.

This study aimed to compare laparoscopic standard gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic sentinel node navigation surgery (LSNNS) for EGC in terms of 5-year long-term oncologic outcomes.

The oncological safety of LSNNS for early gastric cancer (EGC) has not been confirmed. Three-year disease-free survival (DFS), which is the primary endpoint of the phase III multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial (SEntinel Node ORIented Tailored Approach [SENORITA] trial), did not show the non-inferiority of LSNNS relative to LSG.

The SENORITA trial, a multicenter randomized clinical trial, was designed to show that LSNNS is non-inferior to LSG in terms of 3-year DFS. In the present study, we collected 5-year follow-up data from 527 patients recruited in the SENORITA trial as the full analysis set (FAS). Disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and recurrence patterns were evaluated using the FAS of both LSG (n=269) and LSNNS (n=258).

The 5-year DFS was not significantly different between the LSG and LSNNS groups (P=0.0561). During the 5-year follow-up, gastric cancer-related events, such as metachronous cancer, were more frequent in the LSNNS group than in the LSG group. However, ten recurrent cancers in the remnant stomach of both groups were curatively resected by additional gastrectomy and one by additional endoscopic resection. Two of the 198 patients who underwent local resection for stomach preservation based on the LSNNS results developed distant metastasis. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the 5-year OS and DSS (P=0.7403 and P=0.9586, respectively) between the two groups.

The 5-year DFS, DSS and OS did not differ significantly between the two groups. Considering the benefits of LSNNS on postoperative quality of life, LSNNS could be recommended as an alternative treatment option for EGC.

To evaluate the risk factors for lymph node metastasis (LNM) after a non-curative (NC) gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and to validate and eventually refine the eCura scoring system in the Western setting. Also, to assess the rate and risk factors for parietal residual disease.

Retrospective multicentre multinational study of prospectively collected registries from 19 Western centres. Patients who had been submitted to surgery or had at least one follow-up endoscopy were included. The eCura system was applied to assess its accuracy in the Western setting, and a modified version was created according to the results (W-eCura score). The discriminative capacities of the eCura and W-eCura scores to predict LNM were assessed and compared.

A total of 314 NC gastric ESDs were analysed (72% high-risk resection (HRR); 28% local-risk resection). Among HRR patients submitted to surgery, 25% had parietal disease and 15% had LNM in the surgical specimen. The risk of LNM was significantly different across the eCura groups (areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) of 0.900 (95% CI 0.852 to 0.949)). The AUC-ROC of the W-eCura for LNM (0.916, 95% CI 0.870 to 0.961; p=0.012) was significantly higher compared with the original eCura. Positive vertical margin, lymphatic invasion and younger age were associated with a higher risk of parietal residual lesion in the surgical specimen.

The eCura scoring system may be applied in Western countries to stratify the risk of LNM after a gastric HRR. A new score is proposed that may further decrease the number of unnecessary surgeries.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has become the standard treatment for early malignant lesions in the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Its clinical results have been reported to be as good as surgery. The outcomes of rescue surgery after non-curative ESD have been reported to be as good as first-line surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of ESD in the upper GI tract and the outcomes of rescue surgery after non-curative ESD performed in Linz, Austria, between 2009 and January 2023. A total of 193 ESDs were included and divided into 104 esophageal ESD and 89 gastric ESD procedures. The criteria for curative ESD were in line with established guidelines' recommendations. For esophageal lesions, the mean lesion size was 40.3 mm and the rate of curative ESD was 56.7%. In the non-curative ESD, the rate of technical failure as the reason for non-curative ESD was 13.3% and the oncological failure rate was 86.7%. Only 48.7% of indicated rescue surgeries were performed. The main reason for not performing surgery was interdisciplinary consensus due to comorbidity. Perioperative complications Dindo-Clavien ≥ 3 occurred in 22.2% of cases with an in-hospital mortality rate of 0. In gastric lesions, the mean size was 39 mm and the rate of curative ESD was 69.7%. The rate of technical failure as a reason for non-curative ESD was 25.9% and the oncological failure rate was 74.1% for non-curative ESD. Rescue surgery was performed in 48.2% of indicated cases. The perioperative rate for major complications was 0. The outcome of ESD in the upper GI tract is in line with the published literature, and non-curative ESD does not worsen surgical outcomes. The available follow-up data are in line with the international published literature, showing a low rate of residual malignancy in surgical resection specimens. Therefore, the indication of rescue surgery for oncological failure remains challenging. Furthermore, the learning curve of ESD has shown a trend towards improving outcomes over time.

Lymph node (LN) status is vital to evaluate the curative potential of relatively early gastric cancer (GC; T1-T2) treatment (endoscopic or surgery). Currently, there is a lack of robust and convenient methods to identify LN metastasis before therapeutic decision-making.

Genome-wide expression profiles of long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) in primary T1 gastric cancer data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) was used to identify lncRNA expression signature capable of detecting LN metastasis of GC and establish a 10-lncRNA risk-prediction model based on deep learning. The performance of the lncRNA panel in diagnosing LN metastasis was evaluated both in silico and clinical validation methods. In silico validation was conducted using TCGA and Asian Cancer Research Group (ACRG) datasets. Clinical validation was performed on T1 and T2 patients, and the panel's efficacy was compared with that of traditional tumor markers and computed tomography (CT) scans.

Profiling of genome-wide RNA expression identified a panel of lncRNA to predict LN metastasis in T1 stage gastric cancer (AUC = 0.961). A 10-lncRNA risk-prediction model was then constructed, which was validated successfully in T1 and T2 datasets (TCGA, AUC = 0.852; ACRG, AUC = 0.834). Thereafter, the clinical performance of the lncRNA panel was validated in clinical cohorts (T1, AUC = 0.812; T2, AUC = 0.805; T1 + T2, AUC = 0.764). Notably, the panel demonstrated significantly better performance compared with CT and traditional tumor markers.

The novel 10-lncRNA could diagnose LN metastasis robustly in relatively early gastric cancer (T1-T2), with promising clinical potential.

This study aimed to determine long-term outcomes of gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in Western settings based on the latest Japanese indication criteria, and to examine predictors of outcomes and complications.

Data were collected from consecutive patients undergoing gastric ESD at four participating centers from 2009 to 2021. Retrospective analysis using logistic regression and survival analysis was performed.

415 patients were included (mean age 71.7 years; 56.4 % male). Absolute indication criteria (2018 guideline) were met in 75.3 % of patients. Median follow-up was 52 months. Post-resection histology was adenocarcinoma, high grade dysplasia, and low grade dysplasia in 49.9 %, 22.7 %, and 17.1 %, respectively. Perforation, early and delayed bleeding occurred in 2.4 %, 4.3 %, and 3.4 %, respectively. Rates of en bloc and R0 resection, and recurrence on first endoscopic follow-up were 94.7 %, 83.4 %, and 2.7 %, respectively. Relative indication (2018 guideline) for ESD was associated with R1 outcome (P = 0.02). Distal location (P = 0.002) and increased procedure time (P = 0.04) were associated with bleeding, and scarring (P = 0.009) and increased procedure duration (P = 0.003) were associated with perforation. Recurrence-free survival at 2 and 5 years was 94 % and 83 %, respectively.

This is the largest Western multicenter cohort and suggests that gastric ESD is safe and effective in the Western setting. A quarter of patients fell outside the new absolute indications for ESD, suggesting that Western practice involves more advanced lesions. We identified the predictors of complications, which should help to inform future Western practice and research.

Several studies have reported the metachronous gastric cancers (MGCs) with possible lymph node metastasis (LNM) after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication in which a curative ESD had not been achieved. There have been no published reports of evaluations of the features of patients with MGC with possible LNM after ESD and H. pylori eradication.

We identified 264 patients with 369 MGCs after H. pylori eradication among the 4354 patients with 5059 early gastric cancers (EGCs) who underwent ESD between 1999 and 2017 and divided them into two groups: patients with MGCs with possible LNM (Group I) and patients with MGCs undergone curative ESD (Group II). We retrospectively compared the features of patients with MGCs and patients with EGCs at index ESD in the two groups.

Group I consisted of 20 patients with 21 MGCs, and Group II consisted of 244 patients with 348 MGCs. Group I lesions were significantly more common in the posterior wall than in the lesser curvature (odds ratio [OR] = 3.97; 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.20-13.10). Development of Group I was significantly more common in patients with a body mass index (BMI) < 19.0 kg/m2 than in patients with a BMI ≥ 19.0 kg/m2 at index ESD (OR = 4.44; 95% CI 1.30-15.20).

During surveillance endoscopy after gastric ESD and H. pylori eradication, the posterior wall should be carefully examined to detect MGCs early. Lower BMI may be associated with the development of MGCs with possible LNM.

The indication of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for mucosal undifferentiated early gastric cancer (EGC) remains controversial because of risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM). The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for lymph node metastasis (LNM) in mucosal undifferentiated EGC, and further to confirm feasibility of the ESD for the treatment of mucosal undifferentiated EGC.

We retrospectively reviewed data of patients who underwent surgical resection with lymph node dissection of T1a stage primary gastric adenocarcinoma at three medical centers between 2012 and 2022. We evaluated the frequency of lymph node metastasis and the associated risk factors, as well as the lymph node metastasis rate in the expanded indication of mucosal undifferentiated EGC.

A total of 100 surgically treated patients with mucosal undifferentiated EGC were enrolled. LNM was irrelevant to the age, tumor size, location, and macroscopic type (all P > 0.05), while it was significantly associated with lymphovascular invasion (LVI, P ＜0.001). And logistic regression analysis showed that the LVI was the only significant risk factors for LNM (OR: 0.34, 95%CI: 0.06-0.204; P ＜0.001). Of 44 mucosal undifferentiated EGC patients satisfying the expanded indication of ESD, 3 patients (6.8%) showed LN metastasis, all of them with undifferentiated cancer without ulceration, less than 2.0 cm in size.

Because LNM is present in mucosal undifferentiated EGC patients who satisfied the expanded indication of ESD, ESD cannot be considered a better choice than surgery for all undifferentiated EGC patients. LVI was significant risk factors for LNM in patients with mucosal undifferentiated EGC.

Signet-ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) was previously thought to have a worse prognosis than other differentiated gastric cancer (GC), however, recent studies have shown that the prognosis of SRCC is related to pathological type. We hypothesize that patients with SRCC and with different SRCC pathological components have different probability of lymph node metastasis (LNM).

To establish models to predict LNM in early GC (EGC), including early gastric SRCC.

Clinical data from EGC patients who had undergone gastrectomy at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from January 2012 to March 2022 were reviewed. The patients were divided into three groups based on type: Pure SRCC, mixed SRCC, and non-signet ring cell carcinoma (NSRC). The risk factors were identified through statistical tests using SPSS 23.0, R, and Em-powerStats software.

A total of 1922 subjects with EGC were enrolled in this study, and included 249 SRCC patients and 1673 NSRC patients, while 278 of the patients (14.46%) presented with LNM. Multivariable analysis showed that gender, tumor size, depth of invasion, lymphovascular invasion, ulceration, and histological subtype were independent risk factors for LNM in EGC. Establishment and analysis using prediction models of EGC showed that the artificial neural network model was better than the logistic regression model in terms of sensitivity and accuracy (98.0% vs 58.1%, P = 0.034; 88.4% vs 86.8%, P < 0.001, respectively). Among the 249 SRCC patients, LNM was more common in mixed (35.06%) rather than in pure SRCC (8.42%, P < 0.001). The area under the ROC curve of the logistic regression model for LNM in SRCC was 0.760 (95%CI: 0.682-0.843), while the area under the operating characteristic curve of the internal validation set was 0.734 (95%CI: 0.643-0.826). The subgroups analysis of pure types showed that LNM was more common in patients with a tumor size > 2 cm (OR = 5.422, P = 0.038).

A validated prediction model was developed to recognize the risk of LNM in EGC and early gastric SRCC, which can aid in pre-surgical decision making of the best method of treatment for patients.

Early gastric cancer comprises gastric malignancies that are confined to the mucosa or submucosa, irrespective of lymph node metastasis. Endoscopic resection is currently pivotal for the management of such early lesions, and it is the recommended treatment for tumors presenting a very low risk of lymph node metastasis. In general, these lesions consist of two groups of differentiated mucosal adenocarcinomas: non-ulcerated lesions (regardless of their size) and small ulcerated lesions. Endoscopic submucosal dissection is the technique of choice in most cases. This procedure has high rates of complete histological resection while maintaining gastric anatomy and its functions, resulting in fewer adverse events than surgery and having a lesser impact on patient-reported quality of life. Nonetheless, approximately 20% of resected lesions do not fulfill curative criteria and demand further treatment, highlighting the importance of patient selection. Additionally, the preservation of the stomach results in a moderate risk of metachronous lesions, which underlines the need for surveillance. We review the current evidence regarding the endoscopic treatment of early gastric cancer, including the short-and long-term results and management after resection.

Whether endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) applies to undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer (UEGC) remains controversial. We aimed to analyze the risk factors for lymph node metastasis (LNM) in UEGC and evaluate the feasibility of ESD.

This study included 346 patients with UEGC who underwent curative gastrectomy between January 2014 and December 2021. Univariate and multivariate analyses of the correlation between clinicopathological features and LNM were conducted, and the risk factors for exceeding the expanded ESD indications were evaluated.

The overall LNM rate in UEGC was 19.94%. Among the preoperatively assessable factors, submucosal invasion (odds ratio [OR] = 4.77, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.14-10.66) and > 2 cm(OR = 2.49, 95% CI: 1.20-5.15) were independent risk factors for LNM, while postoperative independent risk factors were > 2 cm (OR = 3.35, 95% CI: 1.02-5.40) and lymphovascular invasion(OR = 13.21, 95% CI: 5.18-33.70). Patients who met the expanded indications had a low LNM risk (4.1%). Additionally, tumors located in the cardia (P = 0.03), non-elevated type (P < 0.01) were independent risk factors for exceeding the expanded indications in UEGC.

ESD may be applicable for UEGC meeting the expanded indications, and preoperative evaluation should be cautious when the lesion is non-elevated type or located in the cardia.

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (12/05/2022 ChiCTR2200059841 ).

The frequency of lymph node metastases per lymph node site in early gastric cancer has not been well clarified from the data based on prospective studies. This exploratory analysis aimed to determine the frequency and location of lymph node metastases in clinical T1 gastric cancer using the data from JCOG0912 to investigate the validity of the extent of standard lymph node dissection defined in Japanese guidelines.

This analysis included 815 patients with clinical T1 gastric cancer. The proportion of pathological metastasis was identified for each lymph node site per tumor location (middle third and lower third) and four equal parts of the gastric circumference. The secondary aim was identification of the risk factor for lymph node metastasis.

Eighty-nine patients (10.9%) had pathologically positive lymph node metastases. Although the overall frequency of metastases was low (0.3-5.4%), metastases were widely located in each lymph node sites when primary lesion was in the middle third of the stomach. No. 4sb and 9 showed no metastasis when primary lesion was in the lower third of the stomach. Lymph node dissection of metastatic nodes resulted in a 5-year survival in more than 50% of patients. A tumor greater than 3 cm and a T1b tumor were associated with lymph node metastasis.

This supplementary analysis demonstrated that nodal metastasis from early gastric cancer is widely and disorderly not depending on the location. Thus, systematic lymph node dissection is necessary to cure the early gastric cancer.

Few studies showed that mixed type early gastric cancer (EGC) relates to higher risk of lymph node metastasis. We aimed to explore the clinicopathological feature of GC according to different proportions of undifferentiated components (PUC) and develop a nomogram to predict status of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in EGC lesions.

Clinicopathological data of the 4,375 patients who underwent surgically resection for gastric cancer in our center were retrospectively evaluated and finally 626 cases were included. We classified mixed type lesions into five groups (M1:0% < PUC ≤ 20%, M2:20%<PUC ≤ 40%, M3:40%<PUC ≤ 60%, M4:60%<PUC ≤ 80%, M5:80%<PUC < 100%). Lesions with 0% PUC were classified as pure differentiated group (PD) and lesions with 100% PUC were classified as pure undifferentiated group (PUD).

Compared with PD, LNM rate was higher in group M4 and group M5 (p < 0.05 after Bonferroni correction). Differences of tumor size, presence of lymphovascular invasion (LVI), perineural invasion and invasion depth also exist between groups. No statistical difference of LNM rate was found in cases who met the absolute endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) indications for EGC patients. Multivariate analysis revealed that tumor size over 2 cm, submucosa invasion to SM2, presence of LVI and PUC level M4 significantly predicted LNM in EGC. With the AUC of 0.899(P < 0.05), the nomogram exhibited a good discrimination. Internal validation by Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed a good fitting effect in model (P > 0.05).

PUC level should be considered as one of the predicting risk factors of LNM in EGC. A nomogram that predicts the risk of LNM in EGC was developed.