The accelerated approval (AA) pathway was established by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to provide earlier access to therapies for patients with serious medical conditions and unmet medical needs. Since its inception, the AA pathway has been used for novel treatments across different therapeutic areas, but most prominently in oncology, including the immune checkpoint inhibitor class. This review article describes the history of regulatory approvals for pembrolizumab, an immunotherapy agent targeting programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1), and use of the AA pathway and the corresponding regulatory decisions made by the FDA. From its first AA in September 2014 to February 2024, pembrolizumab has used the accelerated pathway for roughly 40% of the approved indications listed in the US Prescribing Information and was the first oncology therapy to receive an AA for an alternate dosing regimen and a tissue-agnostic indication. As of February 2024, 14 of the 18 indication-specific AAs and 1 post-marketing requirement (PMR) for the alternate dosing regimen AA were converted to traditional approvals. Accelerated approvals for two indications were withdrawn, and the remaining ongoing PMRs are not due until later in 2024 or 2025. The median conversion time from AA to traditional approval was 2.6 years, which is roughly 6 months earlier than the median time reported for oncology AAs. While FDA was the first agency to establish an expedited approval pathway, regulators from other countries have established similar pathways. For pembrolizumab, approximately half of the datasets that supported US AAs also supported expedited approval, or sometimes full approval, in Canada, EU, Australia or Japan. Ultimately, the AA pathway balances the provision of earlier access to therapies with overcoming uncertainty about potential effectiveness, and therefore it is important to confirm treatment benefit and withdraw indications that do not confirm benefit in a timely manner. The regulatory strategy and use of this expedited program for pembrolizumab highlights the importance of the AA pathway in providing oncology patients with earlier access to life-saving medications.

In oncology, comprehensive omics and functional enrichment studies have led to an extensive profiling of (epi)genetic and neurobiological alterations that can be mapped onto a single tumor's clinical phenotype and divergent clinical phenotypes expressing common pathophysiological pathways. Consequently, molecular pathway-based therapeutic interventions for different cancer typologies, namely tumor type- and site-agnostic treatments, have been developed, encouraging the real-world implementation of a paradigm shift in medicine. Given the breakthrough nature of the new-generation translational research and drug development in oncology, there is an increasing rationale to transfertilize this blueprint to other medical fields, including psychiatry and neurology. In order to illustrate the emerging paradigm shift in neuroscience, we provide a state-of-the-art review of translational studies on the β-site amyloid precursor protein cleaving enzyme (BACE) and its most studied downstream effector, neuregulin, which are molecular orchestrators of distinct biological pathways involved in several neurological and psychiatric diseases. This body of data aligns with the evidence of a shared genetic/biological architecture among Alzheimer's disease, schizoaffective disorder, and autism spectrum disorders. To facilitate a forward-looking discussion about a potential first step towards the adoption of biological pathway-based, clinical symptom-agnostic, categorization models in clinical neurology and psychiatry for precision medicine solutions, we engage in a speculative intellectual exercise gravitating around BACE-related science, which is used as a paradigmatic case here. We draw a perspective whereby pathway-based therapeutic strategies could be catalyzed by highthroughput techniques embedded in systems-scaled biology, neuroscience, and pharmacology approaches that will help overcome the constraints of traditional descriptive clinical symptom and syndrome-focused constructs in neurology and psychiatry.

Tumor diagnosis relies on the visual examination of histological slides by pathologists through a microscope eyepiece. Digital pathology, the digitalization of histological slides at high magnification with slides scanners, has raised the opportunity to extract quantitative information thanks to image analysis. In the last decade, medical image analysis has made exceptional progress due to the development of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms. AI has been successfully used in the field of medical imaging and more recently in digital pathology. The feasibility and usefulness of AI assisted pathology tasks have been demonstrated in the very last years and we can expect those developments to be applied on routine histopathology in the future. In this review, we will describe and illustrate this technique and present the most recent applications in the field of tumor histopathology.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have demonstrated meaningful patterns of clinical efficacy across various cancers. During their development, novel regulatory strategies and clinical design approaches were explored. This metrics-based narrative review examines submission strategies and clinical evidence expectations of the US, European, and Japanese drug agencies, as well as their impact on approval and overall development times. Also discussed is the role of emerging clinical science and biomarker evaluation to get the first six ICI initially approved.

Nearly 20 years have passed since the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the first companion diagnostic and today this type of assay governs the use of 21 different anticancer drugs. The regulators deem these assays essential for the safe and effective use of a corresponding therapeutic product. The companion diagnostic assays are important both during the drug development process as well as essential treatment decision tools after the approval of the drugs.

In January 2017, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) formally established the Oncology Center of Excellence (OCE) to streamline the development of cancer therapies by uniting experts from FDA product centers to conduct expedited review of drugs, biologics, and devices. In May 2017, the FDA approved a cancer treatment based on a biomarker, without regard to the tumor's site, by granting accelerated approval to pembrolizumab for patients with solid tumors that have the microsatellite instability-high or mismatch repair deficient biomarker. We describe here the OCE's role in this first site-agnostic approval and OCE programs for further advancement of oncology-related regulatory science and policy. In addition, the FDA's four expedited review programs that enable transformative therapies to reach patients with life-threatening malignancies earlier in the development process are key to the continued rapid development of safe and effective therapies for patients with few or no other treatment options. These changes at FDA are taking place in the context of recent progress in the understanding of the genetic and immunologic foundations of cancer, resulting in the development of targeted therapies and immunotherapies. The traditional system of phased clinical trials has evolved as early trials of breakthrough therapies use expansion cohorts in a process known as seamless drug development. Increasingly, FDA approvals of targeted therapies are likely to have contemporaneous approvals of companion diagnostics to identify patients whose cancers harbor actionable abnormalities. Impact statement This publication describes the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) first site-agnostic oncology drug approval, a landmark event in the history of cancer drug development. The role of the FDA's newly established Oncology Center of Excellence (OCE) in this approval is described, as are several OCE programs to advance excellence in regulatory science in the era of precision medicine. Also provided is an overview of FDA's expedited drug review programs, which are important to the continued acceleration of therapeutics development for patients with life-threatening diseases and few or no other treatment options.

We are in the midst of a technological revolution that is providing new insights into human biology and cancer. In this era of big data, we are amassing large amounts of information that is transforming how we approach cancer treatment and prevention. Enactment of the Cancer Moonshot within the 21st Century Cures Act in the USA arrived at a propitious moment in the advancement of knowledge, providing nearly US$2 billion of funding for cancer research and precision medicine. In 2016, the Blue Ribbon Panel (BRP) set out a roadmap of recommendations designed to exploit new advances in cancer diagnosis, prevention, and treatment. Those recommendations provided a high-level view of how to accelerate the conversion of new scientific discoveries into effective treatments and prevention for cancer. The US National Cancer Institute is already implementing some of those recommendations. As experts in the priority areas identified by the BRP, we bolster those recommendations to implement this important scientific roadmap. In this Commission, we examine the BRP recommendations in greater detail and expand the discussion to include additional priority areas, including surgical oncology, radiation oncology, imaging, health systems and health disparities, regulation and financing, population science, and oncopolicy. We prioritise areas of research in the USA that we believe would accelerate efforts to benefit patients with cancer. Finally, we hope the recommendations in this report will facilitate new international collaborations to further enhance global efforts in cancer control.