We estimated the 5-year overall, age at diagnosis- and stage-specific colorectal cancer survival in patients treated through their coverage with Seguro Popular.

We conducted a retrospective study using a dataset that included 1418 colorectal cancer patients covered by Seguro Popular (Mexico's public health insurance system covering 60 % of the population) between 2013 and 2016. Deaths were identified using the Epidemiologic Death Statistics Subsystem registry, with a specialized algorithm for record linkage. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival curves and the proportion of patients alive at various follow-up time points. We compared survival curves across subgroups using the log-rank test.

In this study the average age at diagnosis was 56 years with 31.9 % of patients diagnosed before the age of 50. Most cases (78.1 %) were diagnosed in advanced stages (i.e., III and IV), with nearly half of the cases originating in the rectum. The overall 5-year survival was 50 %, with higher survival (74 %) for patients with stage I-II and lower survival for those with stage III (58 %) and IV (33 %). While age at diagnosis was not associated with survival for early-stage colorectal cancer, younger patients with metastatic disease had a worse prognosis compared to older patients.

The 5-year overall colorectal cancer survival was 50 %, with variation by clinical stage. Almost 80 % of the population was diagnosed with advanced stages, underscoring the need for screening programs. Younger patients with metastatic disease exhibited a worse prognosis, highlighting the need for targeted interventions.

In the last years, a dramatic increase in colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnoses in early-onset (EO) patients has been observed. The prognosis of EO-CRC compared to late-onset (LO) patients is still unclear. This meta-analysis aims to clarify whether there is any difference in the prognosis between the two groups.

A systematic review was conducted on EMBASE-Medline, Pubmed and Cochrane Library in March 2024 to identify studies comparing overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), disease-free survival (DFS), local recurrence (LR) and distant recurrence (DR) risk outcomes between EO-CRC (<50 years old) and LO-CRC (>50 years old) with at least 50 patients per group and one year of follow-up. The risk of bias was assessed with the ROBINS-E tool. Data from stage prevalence and survival were extracted and meta-analysed. Meta-regression was used to identify impacting effect modifiers. The PROSPERO registration number was CRD42024573264.

Twenty-six studies were identified; 1,062,037 patients (13.4% EO-CRC and 86.6% LO-CRC) were included in the stage prevalence and 567,689 in the prognostic meta-analysis. Overall, 60% of the EO-CRC and 49% of the LO-CRC were diagnosed with an advanced stage (III-IV) of disease (RR 1.26, 95%CI 1.19-1.35, I2=87%). EO-CRC had a better OS than LO-CRC (HR 0.89, 95%CI 0.81-0.99, I2=89%) but equal CSS (HR 0.94, 95%CI 0.83-1.06, I2=82%), DFS (HR 1.05 95%CI 0.94-1.16, I2=76%), LR (HR 1.41, 95%CI 0.62-3.18, I2=49%) and DR (HR 1.51, 95%CI 0.79-2.89) risk. Meta-regression analysis identified a worse DFS in the EO-CRC rectal cancer subgroup (HR 1.14, 95%CI 1.00-1.30, I2=0%).

Despite the high heterogeneity of existing studies, EO-CRC patients are diagnosed with significantly more advanced stages than LO-CRC, although this is not reflected in any difference in cancer-related survival. There is an urgent need for increased vigilance in the early detection of CRC in young patients.

Early onset Colorectal Cancer (EOCRC), defined as those diagnosed under the age of 50, has been increasing rapidly since 1970. UK data on EOCRC are currently limited and better understanding of the condition is needed.

A single-center retrospective study of patients with EOCRC treated over 9 years (2013-2021) at a large UK cancer center was performed. Clinicopathological features, risk factors, molecular drivers, treatment, and survival were analyzed.

In total, 203 patients were included. A significant increase in cases was reported from 2018-2019 (n = 33) to 2020-2021 (n = 118). Sporadic EOCRC accounted for 70% of cases and left-sided tumors represented 70.9% (n = 144). Median duration of symptoms was 3 months, while 52.7% of the patients had de-novo metastatic disease. Progression-free survival after first-line chemotherapy was 6 months (95% CI, 4.85-7.15) and median overall survival (OS) was 38 months (95% CI, 32.86-43.14). In the advanced setting, left-sided primary tumors were associated with a median OS benefit of 14 months over right-sided primaries (28 vs 14 months, P = .009). Finally, primary tumor resection was associated with median OS benefit of 21 months compared with in situ tumors (38 vs 17 months, P < .001).

The incidence of EOCRC is increasing, and survival outcomes remain modest. Raising public awareness and lowering the age for colorectal cancer screening are directions that could improve EOCRC clinical outcomes. There is also a need for large prospective studies to improve the understanding of the nature of EOCRC and the best therapeutic approaches.

Endometrial cancer (EC) is one of the most frequent gynecologic cancers, approximately 20% of patients are regarded as high-risk with poor prognosis. However, more details of patients with second primary endometrial cancer (SPEC) after colorectal cancer (CRC) remain poorly understood. We therefore proposed to construct two nomograms to predict 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates to facilitate clinical application.

A total of 1631 participants were identified in the SEER database from 1973 to 2020. We constructed and validated the nomograms for predicting OS and CSS. The receiver operating characteristic curves, calibration plot, decision curve analysis, C-index, net reclassification improvement, and integrated discrimination improvement were applied to evaluate the predictive performance. Finally, the Prognostic index was calculated and used for risk stratification of Kaplan-Meier survival analysis based on different treatment options.

Nomograms of OS and CSS were formulated based on the independent prognostic factors utilizing the training set. The 3- and 5- years of OS nomogram demonstrated good discrimination (AUC = 0.840 and 0.829, respectively), well-calibrated power, and excellent clinical effectiveness. Our nomograms of predicting OS and CSS had a concordance index of 0.801 and 0.866 compared with 0.676 and 0.746 for the AJCC staging system, and more importantly, demonstrated a better forecast accuracy. Chemoradiotherapy displayed a significant survival benefit in the high-risk groups, but proceeding to surgery plus chemotherapy showed a favorable survival for the low groups based on all patients.

We developed and internally validated multivariable models that predict OS and CSS risk of SPEC in patients with a CRC to help clinicians make applicable clinical decisions for patients.

Early onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) is rising. The profile of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) impacts may differ in this younger cohort. Online forums are a source of unfiltered information regarding patient experience. This study used a qualitative analysis of online forum messages to elicit the unique HRQOL impacts of EOCRC.

Messages were extracted from an online EOCRC UK forum. Inductive coding (with 10% dual-coding) and thematic analysis were used to describe the impact of diagnosis and treatment on HRQOL.

Data extraction and analyses were performed over one month; 463 messages (dated 01/04/2019 to 31/03/2024) were included. There was 100% concordance on dual-coding for main themes. Eight themes emerged: (1) diagnostic pathway and barriers; (2) parenthood and effect on children; (3) employment and finances; (4) fertility and early menopause; (5) stoma implications; (6) support systems, relationships and isolation; (7) sport and exercise and (8) mental health.

Qualitative thematic analysis of online forum data is a novel and efficient methodology for understanding the impact of cancer on HRQOL. Identified themes overlapped with those published in previous systematic reviews. This study offers new insights into the impact of isolation, early menopause, benefits of parenthood, psychological impact on children and practical and psychological implications of potential infertility in EOCRC. Current understanding of the diagnostic challenges and unique HRQOL impacts of EOCRC raises future research questions regarding how colorectal cancer services should evolve to provide support more in keeping with the needs of this growing younger cohort.

The diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) at early ages has become a challenging trend for oncology due to high rates of mortality worldwide. The correlation of clinical features with young-age prognosis in CRC remains unclear. Therefore, we aimed to describe the clinicopathological features and their impact on the overall survival of young Mexican adults diagnosed with CRC treated in the National Cancer Institute.

This was a retrospective, observational study. The included patients were treated at the National Cancer Institute between 2004 and 2020. The statistical analyses comprised the X2 and t tests, Kaplan-Meier, log rank, and Cox regression. Statistical significances were assessed when p was bilaterally < 0.05.

A total of 3652 patients diagnosed with CRC attended the National Cancer Institute. Cases of early onset of CRC increased over the 16 years under study, with significant differences between the median age, from 57 in 2004 to 55 years old in 2020 (F = 5.49; gl: 12 p = 0.019). For this analysis, the population was divided in three groups: young (≤30 years), adults (31-70), and elderly (>70). The young population was mostly composed of men (62%; (n = 63), (p = 0.020), with high rates of metastatic disease (44%) (p = 0.001) and right-side tumors (57%), (p = 0.046), and with 44% with a moderate grade (p = 0.750). According to the overall survival (OS) analysis, the median OS was 29 months for young, versus 170 months for adult and 56 months for elderly patients (p <0.001, HR 1.53, 95% CI 1.11-2.10). A sub-analysis was performed considering only patients with metastatic disease. The median OS was 12 months for young, versus 17 and 9 months for adults and elderly (p = 0.08, HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.02-1.46).

CRC diagnosis in the young population is increasing due unhealthy lifestyle habits and lack of screening. This population have clinical features of bad prognosis, such as left side, poor grade differentiation, and metastatic disease, precluding prognosis and OS.

Whether patients with early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) receive chemotherapy has been controversial, so our study aimed to screen patients with EOCRC who benefit from chemotherapy.

A total of 2166 EOCRC patients were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Patients were divided into chemotherapy and non-chemotherapy groups, propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance the differences between the groups, and the Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the cancer-specific survival (CSS) of EOCRC patients. Multifactorial COX regression analysis was used to identify independent prognostic factors for CSS and to construct a nomogram for predicting CSS in EOCRC patients. The overall risk score was calculated based on Nomogram, and EOCRC patients were classified into high-risk and low-risk groups to assess further chemotherapy's therapeutic effect on patients with different risk stratification.

Before PSM, patients in the chemotherapy group had poorer CSS (p < 0.001). After PSM, there was no significant difference in patient CSS between the two groups (p = 0.057). Independent prognostic factors (Race, Grade, Pathology, AJCC.N, AJCC.M, CEA, Marital. Status) were screened according to multifactorial COX regression analyses and included in the Nomogram predicting CSS in EOCRC patients. A risk stratification system for EOCRC patients was further developed, and the results showed that chemotherapy had no significant effect on CSS in the low-risk group of patients, but in the high-risk group, chemotherapy significantly improved CSS in EOCRC patients.

We developed a clinical risk model by combining different risk factors, which can accurately screen those with high-risk EOCRC for benefit from chemotherapy. For low-risk EOCRC patients, our results did not observe a better survival benefit from chemotherapy, and more prospective studies are needed in the future to prove our conclusions.

The incidence of oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC) has been reported to be increasing in many countries. Alongside this trend, an increase in incidence of early-onset OAC, defined as OAC in adults aged under 50 years, has been observed. It is unclear whether survival outcomes for early-onset OAC patients differ from older age groups.

To investigate survival outcomes in early-onset OAC patients.

Ovid Medline and Embase were searched from inception to January 2022 for relevant studies relating to early-onset OAC and survival outcomes. Results regarding the overall five-year survival and risk of death of younger and older patients with OAC were extracted and pooled using meta-analyses to produce pooled estimates and 95%CIs where possible.

Eleven studies which compared survival of early-onset OAC, defined as age at diagnosis of < 50 years, with older patients were included. A narrative review of median and mean survival demonstrated conflicting results, with studies showing early-onset OAC patients having both better and worse outcomes compared to older age groups. A meta-analysis of five-year survival demonstrated similar outcomes across age groups, with 22%-25% of patients in the young, middle and older age groups alive after five years. A meta-analysis of four studies demonstrated that early-onset OAC patients did not have a significantly increased risk of death compared to middle-aged patients (hazard ratio 1.12, 95%CI: 0.85-1.47).

Results suggest that early-onset OAC patients do not have a significantly different survival compared to older patients, but further population-based research, taking into account stage and treatment, is required.

Colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) is a malignant tumor type. Fever is the most common postoperative complication of COAD. The present study described the treatment of a patient with early-stage COAD with precancerous colon polyps and the possible cause of postoperative fever. The patient was a 48-year-old woman with intermittent hematochezia, defecation urgency and liquid feces. The patient received surgical treatment, a whole segment from the intestine was removed, which contained a 4-cm-long mass and a 2-cm-long firm mass. Within 3 days after the operation, the patient's incision healed well, but the body temperature increased to a range of 37.8-38.6°C. The suture was removed on the 10th postoperative day. After another three days, it was discovered that the upper end of the patient's surgical incision split to the anterior rectus abdominis sheath. The patient was provided with recombinant human acidic fibroblast growth factor to promote wound healing. The patient was finally diagnosed with rectosigmoid junction adenocarcinoma and precancerous colon polyps according to pathological examination results. The patient was given intravenous bevacizumab combined with irinotecan hydrochloride and oral capecitabine, and all drugs were repeatedly applied every 3 weeks, and a total of four treatment cycles were used. The cause of this postoperative fever was concluded to be anemia coming from chronic hematochezia and combined with deep wound dehiscence with secondary infection. The present study showcased that low-dose and short-course prophylactic adjuvant therapy is feasible for early-stage COAD with precancerous colon polyps.

Management of colon cancer has changed over the last few decades. We assessed the trends in management and outcomes using the US National Cancer Database (NCDB). A retrospective analysis of all patients with colonic adenocarcinoma between 2005 and 2019 was conducted. The cohort was divided into three equal time periods: Period 1 (2005-2009), Period 2 (2010-2014), and Period 3 (2015-2019) to examine treatment and outcomes trends. The primary outcome was 5-year overall survival (OS). The study included 923,275 patients. A significant increase in patients with stage IV disease was noted in Period 3 compared to Period 1 (47.9% vs. 27.9%, respectively), whereas a reciprocal reduction was seen in patients with locally advanced disease (stage II: 20.8%-12%; stage III: 14.5%-7.7%). Use of immunotherapy significantly increased from 0.3% to 7.6%. Mean 5-year OS increased (43.6 vs. 42.1 months) despite the increase in metastatic disease and longer time from diagnosis to definitive surgery (7 vs. 14 days). A reduction in 30-day readmission (5.1%-4.2%), 30- (3.9%-2.8%), and 90-day mortality (7.1%-5%) was seen. Laparoscopic and robotic surgery increased from 45.8% to 53.1% and 2.9% to 12.7%, respectively. Median postoperative length of hospital stay decreased by 2 days. Rate of positive resection margins (7.2%-6%) and median number of examined lymph nodes (14-16) also improved. Minimally invasive surgery and immunotherapy for colon cancer significantly increased in recent years. Patient outcomes including OS improved over time.

In a randomized clinical trial, treatment guided by tumor-informed circulating tumor (ct)DNA testing reduced adjuvant chemotherapy use without compromising recurrence-free survival in patients with stage II colon cancer. The potential effects of adopting ctDNA testing into routine patient care is unknown.

To compare the total cost of patient care scenarios with and without the adoption of ctDNA testing.

This budget impact analysis was conducted from the perspectives of US commercial health and Medicare Advantage payers. A decision-analytical model was populated with age-specific incidence of colon cancer, use of adjuvant chemotherapy, and use of single-agent or multiagent regimens. Total cost was estimated with the costs of ctDNA testing, drug acquisition, administration, surveillance, and adverse events. The analysis was conducted from September 2023 to January 2024.

The adoption of ctDNA testing.

The incremental cost in the first year following the adoption of ctDNA testing, where testing will affect patient treatment and costs.

In hypothetical plans with 1 million individuals covered, 35 commercial health plan members and 102 Medicare Advantage members aged 75 years and younger were eligible for ctDNA testing. In the base case with a 50% adoption rate, total cost savings were $221 684 (equivalent to $0.02 per member per month [PMPM]) for a commercial payer and $116 720 (equivalent to $0.01 PMPM) for a Medicare Advantage payer. Cost savings were robust to variations in assumptions of all parameters in the commercial population but sensitive to variations in assumptions of adjuvant chemotherapy use rates in the Medicare Advantage population. The number needed to test to avoid 1 patient receiving adjuvant chemotherapy was 4 in the commercial population and 10 in the Medicare Advantage population. The budget-neutral cost for ctDNA testing was $16 202 for a commercial payer and $5793 for a Medicare Advantage payer.

Use of tumor-informed ctDNA testing to guide adjuvant chemotherapy in postsurgery patients with stage II colon cancer was projected to result in cost savings for both commercial and Medicare Advantage payers. Adoption of ctDNA testing is therefore advantageous from a budgetary perspective.

The incidence of early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) is increasing. International guidelines state that treatment should not differ from that of older patients. Several studies have shown that patients under 50 years are receiving more aggressive treatment, without any survival benefit. We aim to determine if treatment for stages 2 and 3 EOCRC differs from those of late-onset colorectal cancer (LOCRC) patients.

This was a retrospective, population-based, cohort study of the treatment patterns of patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer in Canterbury, New Zealand, from 2010 to 2021 age <50 years, compared to those aged 60-74 years.

A total of 3263 patients were diagnosed with CRC between 2010 and 2021. Following exclusions, we identified 130 EOCRC and 668 LOCRC patients. Stage 2 EOCRC patients are more likely to be offered adjuvant chemotherapy (p = <0.001). Furthermore, EOCRC patients with either stage 2 or 3 disease are more likely to receive multi-agent therapy (p =  <0.01), without any associated increase in survival.

EOCRC patients are given more adjuvant chemotherapy, without a corresponding improvement in outcomes, highlighting a potential for increased treatment-related harms, particularly in stage 2 disease. Clinicians should be mindful of these biases when treating young cancer patients and need to carefully consider treatment-related harms.

The early-onset rectal cancer with rapidly increasing incidence is considered to have distinct clinicopathological and molecular profiles with high-risk features. This leads to challenges in developing specific treatment strategies for early-onset rectal cancer patients and questions of whether early-onset locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) needs aggressive neoadjuvant treatment.

In this post hoc analysis of FOWARC trial, we investigated the role of preoperative radiation in early-onset LARC by comparing the clinicopathological profiles and short-term and long-term outcomes between the early-onset and late-onset LARCs.

We revealed an inter-tumor heterogeneity of clinical profiles and treatment outcomes between the early-onset and late-onset LARCs. The high-risk features were more prevalent in early-onset LARC. The neoadjuvant radiation brought less benefits of tumor response and more risk of complications in early-onset group (pCR: OR = 3.75, 95% CI = 1.37-10.27; complications: HR = 11.35, 95% CI = 1.46-88.31) compared with late-onset group (pCR: OR = 5.33, 95% CI = 1.83-15.58; complications: HR = 5.80, 95% CI = 2.32-14.49). Furthermore, the addition of radiation to neoadjuvant chemotherapy didn't improve long-term OS (HR = 1.37, 95% CI = 0.49-3.87) and DFS (HR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.58-1.90) for early-onset patients.

Preoperative radiation plus chemotherapy may not be superior to the chemotherapy alone in the early-onset LARC. Our findings provide insight into the treatment of early-onset LARC by interrogating the aggressive treatment and alternative regimens.

Background: Cancer often co-occurs with other chronic conditions, which may result in polypharmacy. Polypharmacy is associated with adverse outcomes, including increased health service utilization. Objectives: This study examines the overall prevalence of polypharmacy (5 or more medications) among adults with cancer and multimorbidity, as well as the association of both minor polypharmacy (5-9 medications) and hyper-polypharmacy (10 or more medications) on high use of emergency room visits and hospitalizations, while controlling for age, sex, and type and stage of cancer. Methods: This retrospective longitudinal study used linked health administrative databases and included persons 18 years and older diagnosed with cancer between April 2010 and March 2013 in Ontario, Canada. Data on the number of health service utilizations at or above the 90th percentile (high users), was collected up to March 2014 and multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the impact of polypharmacy. Results: The prevalence of polypharmacy was 46% prior to cancer diagnosis, and 57% one year after diagnosis. Polypharmacy prior to and after cancer diagnosis increased with the level of multimorbidity, increasing age, but did not differ by sex. It was also highest in persons with lung cancer (52.4%) and those diagnosed with stage 4 cancer (51.3%). Minor polypharmacy increased the odds of being a high user of emergency rooms (1.16; 99% CI: 1.09-1.24) and hospitalizations (1.03; 0.98-1.09) and the odds of high use was greater with hyper-polypharmacy (1.41; 1.33-1.51) and (1.23; 1.17-1.29) respectively. Conclusion: Polypharmacy is highly prevalent and is associated with high health service utilization among adults with cancer and multimorbidity.

Various developments have been observed in the treatment of cancer patients, such as higher survival rates and better treatment outcomes. However, expecting similar outcomes in older patients remains a challenge. The main reason for this conclusion is the exclusion of older people from clinical trials for cancer drugs, as well as other factors, such as comorbidity, side effects, age-related frailties and their willingness to undergo multiple treatments. However, the discovery of new techniques and drug combinations has led to a significant improvement in the survival of the elderly population after the onset of the disease. On the other hand, cancer treatments have not become more complex for the younger population when compared to the older population, as the younger population tends to respond well to treatment trials and their physiological conditions are stable in response to treatments. In summary, this review correlates recent cancer treatment strategies and the corresponding responses and survival outcomes of older and younger patients.

Chemotherapy remains a major treatment for malignant tumors, yet the application of standard dose intensity chemotherapy is limited due to the side effects of cytotoxic drugs, especially in old populations. The underlying mechanisms of cytotoxicity and strategies to increase the safety and tolerance of chemotherapy remain to be explored. Using 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), a cornerstone chemotherapeutic drug, we demonstrate that the main cause of death in ad libitum (AL) fed mice after 5-FU chemotherapy was infection caused by translocation of intestinal opportunistic pathogens. We show that these opportunistic pathogens greatly increase in the intestine after chemotherapy, which was closely related to loss of intestinal lysozyme. Of note, two weeks of dietary restriction (DR) prior to chemotherapy significantly protected the loss of lysozyme and increased the content of the beneficial Lactobacillus genera, resulting in a substantial inhibition of intestinal opportunistic pathogens and their translocation. The rescue effect of DR could be mimicked by Lysozyme or Lactobacillus gavage. Our study provides the first evidence that DR achieved a comprehensive protection of the intestinal physical, biological and chemical barriers, which significantly improved the overall survival of 5-FU-treated mice. Importantly, the above findings were more prominent in old mice. Furthermore, we show that patients over 65 years old have enriched opportunistic pathogens in their gut microbiota, especially after 5-FU based chemotherapy. Our study reveals important mechanisms for the poor chemotherapy tolerance of the elderly population, which can be significantly improved by short-term DR. This study generates new insights into methods for improving the chemotherapeutic prognosis by increasing the chemotherapy tolerance and safety of patients with malignant tumors.

Identifying low-value cancer care may be an important step in containing costs associated with treatment. Low-value care occurs when the medical services, tests, or treatments rendered do not result in clinical benefit. These may be impacted by care setting and patients' access to care and health insurance. We aimed to study chemotherapy treatment and the cost paid by the Department of Defense (DoD) for treatment in relation to clinical outcomes among patients with colon cancer treated within the U.S. Military Health System's direct and private sector care settings to better understand the value of cancer care.

A cohort of patients aged 18 to 64 years with primary colon cancer diagnosed between January 1, 1999, and December 31, 2014, were identified in the Military Cancer Epidemiology database. Multivariable time-dependent Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess the relationship between chemotherapy treatment and the cost paid by the DoD (in quartiles, Q) and the outcomes of cancer progression, cancer recurrence, and all-cause death modeled as adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). The Military Cancer Epidemiology data were approved for research by the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences' Institutional Review Board.

The study included 673 patients using direct care and 431 patients using private sector care. The median per patient chemotherapy costs in direct care ($111,202) were lower than in private sector care ($350,283). In direct care, higher chemotherapy costs were associated with an increased risk of any outcome but not with all-cause death. In private sector care, higher chemotherapy costs were associated with a higher risk of any outcome and with all-cause death (aHR, 2.67; 95% CI, 1.20-5.92 for Q4 vs. Q1).

The findings in the private sector may indicate low-value care in terms of the cost paid by the DoD for chemotherapy treatment and achieving desirable survival outcomes for patients with colon cancer in civilian health care. Comprehensive evaluations of value-based care among patients treated for other tumor types may be warranted.

This study aimed to compare the clinical characteristics and survival differences between early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) patients and late-onset colorectal cancer (LOCRC) patients, identify the risk factors for cancer-specific mortality (CSM) in LOCRC patients and construct a mortality risk assessment nomogram.

CRC patients diagnosed pathologically between 2010 and 2019 in the SEER database were included and divided into the early-onset group and the late-onset group, and the late-onset group was divided into the training and validation sets. The Fine-Gray competing risk model was applied to analyze the prognostic factors of LOCRC patients and establish a competing risk nomogram for CSM.

There are differences in the distribution of multiple clinical features between the early-onset group and the late-onset group. Age, tumor size, histological type, pathological grading, T stage, N stage, M stage, SEER stage, primary tumor surgery, metastatic lesion surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, neural invasion, and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) were independent influencing factors of the CSM rate in LOCRC patients. The C-index of the prognosis model outweighed 0.8, and the calibration curves fitted the reference line well.

The CSM competing risk nomogram for LOCRC patients in this study had acceptable predictive performance that could be applied to the clinic.

To predict cancer-specific survival, a refined nomogram model and brand-new risk-stratifying system were established to classify the risk levels of patients with early-onset locally advanced colon cancer (LACC).

The clinical factors and survival outcomes of LACC cases from the SEER database from 2010 to 2019 were retrieved retrospectively. Early-onset and late-onset colon cancer were grouped according to the age (50 years old) at diagnosis. Differences between groups were compared to identify mutual significant variables. A multivariate Cox regression analysis was further performed and then constructed a nomogram. We compared it with the AJCC-TNM system. The external validation was performed for evaluation. Finally, a risk-stratifying system of patients with early-onset LACC was established.

A total of 32,855 LACC patients were enrolled in, 4548 (13.84%) patients were included in the early-onset LACC group, and 28,307 (86.16%) patients were included in the late-onset LACC group. The external validation set included 228 early-onset LACC patients. Early-onset colon cancers had poorer prognosis (T4, N2, TNM stage III, CEA, tumor deposit, and nerve invasion), and a higher proportion received radiotherapy and systemic therapy (P<0.001). In the survival analysis, cancer-specific survival (CSS) was better in patients with early-onset LACC than in those with late-onset LACC (P <0.001). This nomogram constructed based on the results of COX analysis showed better accuracy in CSS prediction of early-onset LACC patients than AJCC-TNM system in the training set and external validation set (0.783 vs 0.728; 0.852 vs 0.773).

We developed a novel nomogram model to predict CSS in patients with early-onset LACC it provided a reference in prognosis prediction and selection of individualized treatment, helping clinicians in decision-making.

Survival of patients suffering from metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has increased over the last decades. These benefits appear to be restricted to patients aged 50 and above. However, among the population aged <50, colorectal cancer incidence and mortality rates are significantly rising. The clinical benefit of treatment in this population still is a matter of debate. We aim to compare the clinical outcome between patients aged 50 and younger.

In this retrospective, observational study, we analyzed data from 1,077 patients treated for mCRC at three cancer centers in Austria from January 2005 to December 2019. Patients were divided into two groups based on age at diagnosis: <50 years (eo-CRC) and >50 years (regular-onset CRC, ro-CRC). Propensity score matching was used to control for potential biases, and survival outcomes were compared between the two groups.

The differences in tumor characteristics between eo-CRC and ro-CRC in the overall population were primarily related to tumor sidedness and disease-free survival following intended curative resection. Our data show that eo-CRC patients underwent metastases resection more often and received significantly more lines of treatment in the palliative setting. Overall survival was superior in eo-CRC compared to ro-CRC, even after adjusting for sidedness, timing of metastases, sex, number of treatment lines, and resection of metastases by propensity scoring.

Our study suggests that younger patients benefit at least to the same magnitude or even more from mCRC-treatment than patients aged 50 or above.

Determine trends and survival implications of adjuvant systemic therapy use for lower risk head and neck cancer.

Retrospective cohort study.

US National Cancer Database, 2010 to 2019.

Patients with mucosal head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated with surgery and postoperative radiation therapy were identified. Adjuvant systemic therapy trends in those with and without extranodal extension or positive margins were assessed as annual percent change by JoinPoint analysis. Factors associated with adjuvant systemic therapy and overall survival were assessed with multivariable models and cox proportional hazard models, respectively.

From 2010 to 2019, approximately one-third of head and neck cancer patients without extranodal extension or positive margins received adjuvant systemic therapy. This rate decreased throughout the study period, with the highest annual percent change from 2016 to 2019 (12.21%; 95% confidence interval: 3.73%-19.95%). Younger age, male sex, Hispanic ethnicity, community program setting, advanced stage, and lymphovascular invasion increased the odds a patient would receive adjuvant systemic therapy. Adjuvant systemic therapy was associated with inferior overall survival when used in those without extranodal extension or positive margins after controlling for covariates.

Though decreasing, adjuvant systemic therapy use is still common in the absence of extranodal extension and positive margins, and a variety of patient, provider, and oncologic factors may influence its use. The inferior overall survival after adjuvant systemic therapy in the absence of high-risk features suggests any oncologic benefit may not outweigh the costs and morbidity of the therapy.

Increased awareness of the distinct tumor biology for adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer has led to improvement in outcomes for this population. However, in cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), a paucity of data exist on the AYA population. To our knowledge, we present the largest study to date on AYA disease biology, treatment patterns, and survival outcomes in CCA.

A multi-institutional cohort of patients with CCA diagnosed with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) or extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC) was used for analysis. Retrospective chart review was conducted on patients who were 50 years old and younger (young; n = 124) and older than 50 years (older; n = 723).

Among 1,039 patients screened, 847 patients met eligibility (72% ICC, 28% ECC). Young patients had a larger median tumor size at resection compared with older patients (4.2 v 3.6 cm; P = .048), more commonly had N1 disease (65% v 43%; P = .040), and were more likely to receive adjuvant therapy (odds ratio, 4.0; 95% CI, 1.64 to 9.74). Tumors of young patients were more likely to harbor an FGFR2 fusion, BRAF mutation, or ATM mutation (P < .05 for each). Young patients were more likely to receive palliative systemic therapy (96% v 69%; P < .001), targeted therapy (23% v 8%; P < .001), and treatment on a clinical trial (31% v 19%; P = .004). Among patients who presented with advanced disease, young patients had a higher median overall survival compared with their older counterparts (17.7 v 13.5 months; 95% CI, 12.6 to 22.6 v 11.4 to 14.8; P = .049).

Young patients with CCA had more advanced disease at resection, more commonly received both adjuvant and palliative therapies, and demonstrated improved survival compared with older patients. Given the low clinical trial enrollment and poor outcomes among some AYA cancer populations, data to the contrary in CCA are highly encouraging.

The Military Health System (MHS) of the US Department of Defense (DoD) provides comprehensive medical care to over nine million beneficiaries, including active-duty members, reservists, activated National Guard, military retirees, and their family members. The MHS generates an extensive database containing administrative claims and medical encounter data, while the DoD also maintains a cancer registry that collects information about the occurrence of cancer among its beneficiaries who receive care at military treatment facilities. Collating data from the two sources diminishes the limitations of using registry or medical claims data alone for cancer research and extends their usage. To facilitate cancer research using the unique military health resources, a computer interface linking the two databases has been developed, called Military Cancer Epidemiology, or MilCanEpi. The intent of this article is to provide an overview of the MilCanEpi data system, describing its components, structure, potential uses, and limitations.

The credible data about the burden of early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) in China when compared to other countries in the group of twenty (G20) remained unavailable. We aimed to assess the burden and trends of EOCRC and attributable risk factors in China. Meanwhile, the comparison in the burden and attributable risk factors between China and other G20 countries was also evaluated.

Data on the incidence, prevalence, mortality, disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), and attributable risk factors of EOCRC in China were obtained from Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) 2019 and compared with other G20countries. Temporal trends of age-standardized rates for incidence, prevalence, mortality, and DALYs were evaluated by estimated annual percentage change (EAPC). The autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model was used to forecast the incidence, mortality, and DALY rates of EOCRC in China from 2020 to 2029.

From 1990 to 2019, the age-standardized incidence rate (ASIR) and age-standardized prevalence rate (ASPR) of EOCRC in China increased with the EAPCs of 4.61 [95% confidence interval (CI): 4.45-4.77] and 5.82 (95% CI: 5.60-6.05). When compared to G20 countries, China was ranked 13^th in the ASIR in 1990 and then increased to 2^nd in 2019, second only to Japan. The ASPRs increased in all G20 countries, being highest in Saudi Arabia, followed by China and Mexico. Moreover, China had the highest age-standardized mortality rate and highest age-standardized DALY rate in 2019. In China, the five leading risk factors, for both sexes, were diet low in milk [18.54% (95% UI: 12.71-24.07)], diet low in calcium [15.06% (95% UI: 10.70-20.03)], alcohol use [12.16% (95% UI: 8.87-15.64)], smoking [9.08% (95% UI: 3.39-14.11)], and diet high in red meat [9.08% (95% UI: 3.39-14.11)] in 2019. Over the next 10 years, ASIR, ASMR, and age-standardized DALY rate of EOCRC will increase continuously in males and females.

The burden of EOCRC in China and other G20 countries is worrisome, indicating that coordinated efforts are needed to conduct high-quality researches, allocate medical resources, adjust screening guidelines, and develop effective treatment and prevention strategies in the G20 countries.

Background: The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) is increasing in the young (under 50). Defining the clinicopathological features and cancer-specific outcomes of patients with early-onset CRC is important to optimize screening and treatment strategies. This study evaluated disease-specific features and oncological outcomes of patients with early-onset CRC. Methods: Anonymized data from an international collaboration were analyzed. The inclusion criteria for this study were patients aged <50 years with stage I-III disease surgically resected with curative intent. Overall and disease-free survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: A total of 3378 patients were included, with a median age of 43 (18-49) and a slight male preponderance (54.3%). One-third had a family history of colorectal cancer. Almost all (>95%) of patients were symptomatic at diagnosis. The majority (70.1%) of tumors were distal to the descending colon. Approximately 40% were node positive. Microsatellite instability was demonstrated in one in five patients, representing 10% of rectal and 27% of colon cancers. A defined inherited syndrome was diagnosed in one-third of those with microsatellite instability. Rectal cancer displayed a worse prognosis stage for stage. Five-year disease-free survival for stage I, II, and III colon cancer was 96%, 91%, and 68%, respectively. The equivalent rates for rectal cancer were 91%, 81%, and 62%. Conclusions and relevance: The majority of EOCRC would be captured with flexible sigmoidoscopy. Extending screening to young adults and public health education initiatives are potential interventions to improve survivorship.

Although ulcerative colitis-associated colorectal cancer (UC-CRC) has been described, there are few reports regarding recurrent cases of UC-CRC. In this study, we investigated the risk factors for UC-CRC recurrence.

Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was determined for 144 stage I to III cancer patients among 210 UC-CRC patients from August 2002 to August 2019. The Kaplan‒Meier method was used to obtain the cumulative RFS rate, and the Cox proportional hazard model was used to extract recurrence risk factors. The interaction term between cancer stage and prognostic factors specific to UC-CRC was evaluated using the Cox model. The Kaplan‒Meier method was applied by cancer stage to the UC-CRC-specific prognostic factors for which interaction effects were indicated.

There were 18 cases of recurrence involving patients with stage I to III cancer, and the recurrence rate was 12.5%. The cumulative 5-year RFS rate was 87.5%. Multivariable analysis showed that age at surgery (hazard ratio (HR): 0.95, 95% CI: 0.91-0.99, p = 0.02), undifferentiated carcinoma (HR: 4.42, 95% CI: 1.13-17.24, p = 0.03), lymph node metastasis (HR: 4.11, 95% CI: 1.08-15.69, p = 0.03), and vascular invasion (HR: 8.01, 95% CI: 1.54-41.65, p = 0.01) were significant risk factors for recurrence. Patients with stage III CRC in the young adult (age < 50 years) group had a significantly worse prognosis than those in the adult (age ≥ 50 years) group (p < 0.01).

Age at surgery was identified as a risk factor for UC-CRC recurrence. Young adult patients with stage III cancer may have a poor prognosis.

Cancers in young adults (commonly described as early-onset [EO] cancer) represent a group of malignancies that have unique and challenging biology and genetic, treatment, social, and psychological implications. Even more concerning is a rising trend of EO cancers in multiple tumor types. Research and investigation in EO cancers will help elucidate mechanisms of carcinogenesis, differences in biology and response to treatment, and the need for multidisciplinary care to ensure comprehensive treatment and support for young patients.

WD repeat domain 76 (WDR76) has been reported in multiple tumors, while without relation to chemotherapy resistance. 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is widely adopted in treating colon cancer. However, the resistance of WDR76 and 5-FU in colon cancer remains unclear.

Limma package in R software was employed to analyze the differentially expressed genes. Western blot or quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) were run to assessed the gene expression. The cytotoxic effect was determined according to cell viability assay, colony formation assay in vitro. Cell apoptosis was assayed using flow cytometry. GSEA analysis was performed to identify pathways related to the target gene. Xenografted mice model was employed to evaluate the tumor growth.

Bioinformatic analysis revealed the higher expression of WDR76 in 5-FU sensitive colon cancer cells compared to resistant colon cancer cells, accompanied by the decreased mRNA expression of WDR76 in 5-FU resistant colon cancer cells. The overexpressed WDR76 resulted in the apoptosis and the downregulated colony numbers in 5-FU resistant colon cancer cells, leading to the elevated sensitivity of 5-FU. Meanwhile, knockdown of WDR76 enhances the resistance of 5-FU in colon cancer both in vitro and vivo, which was reversed by a specific inhibitor of HRAS, Kobe006. An important molecular mechanism of 5-FU resistance lies the degradation of HRAS induced by WDR76.

Our findings demonstrated a role of WDR76 as a promising target for reversing the resistance of colon cancer to 5-FU.

Patients with early-onset colorectal cancer (eoCRC) are managed according to guidelines that are not age-specific. A multidisciplinary international group (DIRECt), composed of 69 experts, was convened to develop the first evidence-based consensus recommendations for eoCRC.

After reviewing the published literature, a Delphi methodology was used to draft and respond to clinically relevant questions. Each statement underwent 3 rounds of voting and reached a consensus level of agreement of ≥80%.

The DIRECt group produced 31 statements in 7 areas of interest: diagnosis, risk factors, genetics, pathology-oncology, endoscopy, therapy, and supportive care. There was strong consensus that all individuals younger than 50 should undergo CRC risk stratification and prompt symptom assessment. All newly diagnosed eoCRC patients should receive germline genetic testing, ideally before surgery. On the basis of current evidence, endoscopic, surgical, and oncologic treatment of eoCRC should not differ from later-onset CRC, except for individuals with pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline variants. The evidence on chemotherapy is not sufficient to recommend changes to established therapeutic protocols. Fertility preservation and sexual health are important to address in eoCRC survivors. The DIRECt group highlighted areas with knowledge gaps that should be prioritized in future research efforts, including age at first screening for the general population, use of fecal immunochemical tests, chemotherapy, endoscopic therapy, and post-treatment surveillance for eoCRC patients.

The DIRECt group produced the first consensus recommendations on eoCRC. All statements should be considered together with the accompanying comments and literature reviews. We highlighted areas where research should be prioritized. These guidelines represent a useful tool for clinicians caring for patients with eoCRC.

Early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) incidence is increasing worldwide. Efforts are directed to understand the biological and clinical signatures of EOCRC compared to late-onset colorectal cancer (LOCRC). EOCRC is thought to present differently across different ethnic groups and geographical regions. This study was an attempt to contribute with data from the Arab world toward the understanding of the clinicopathological parameters of EOCRC compared to LOCRC. Data from 254 CRC patients diagnosed at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital from the period 2015-2020 were studied. About 32.6% of all diagnosed CRC patients are below 50 years old, with no differences in gender distribution between EOCRC and LOCRC (p-value 0.417). Rectal involvement and tumor laterality were comparable among the two groups. Adenocarcinoma accounts for 83.3% and 94.2% of EOCRC and LOCRC, respectively. More mucinous and signet ring adenocarcinoma (8.3% each) were reported in EOCRC than LOCRC (2.9% and 2.2%, respectively). MLH1 and PMS2 loss are more common among LOCRC, but MSH6 loss is more frequent in EOCRC. The overall survival of EOCRC and LOCRC was comparable (median survival 64.88 and 67.24 months, respectively). This study showed comparable clinicopathological parameters between EOCRC and LOCRC from Arabs, which adds to the bigger picture of understand the disease.

To define the prognosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) in young patients and to compare their postoperative treatment with that of older patients.

This multicenter study enrolled 5,457 patients with primary CRC who underwent surgical resection. The overall survival (OS), clinicopathologic characteristics, and postoperative treatment of 253 young patients aged 18-44 years and 5,204 older patients aged 44-80 years were analyzed.

The OS rate was 77.1% for young and 74.2% for older patients (P = 0.348). Landmark analysis showed a significant difference in survival between young and older patients, with 63.8% of deaths among young patients being within 25 months of surgery compared with 42.4% among older patients (P = 0.002). Among those who survived more than 25 months, young patients had significantly better survival than older patients (P = 0.009). Multivariable analysis of young patients revealed that the tumor location, perineural invasion, and stage were associated with poor survival within 25 months; after this period, stage was the only prognostic marker. Young patients were more likely to receive chemotherapy, particularly multiagent regimens. For young patients, no significant difference in OS was found based on the chemotherapy regimen, regardless of disease stage (II, III, or IV, all P > 0.05). In addition, unlike in older patients, no difference in OS was found in young patients regardless of the drug regimen administered (all P > 0.05).

Young-onset CRC may have a unique disease biology that warrants further research and therapy development.

The incidence of early-onset CRC is increasing. However, the effect of age of onset on the long-term outcome of colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM) remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the association between the age of onset and the oncological outcome of CRLM patients and to investigate whether the prognostic role of RAS mutation is altered with age.

We retrospectively investigated consecutive patients at our institution who underwent initial liver resection between 2006 and 2020. The inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method was used to balance the confounders among early- (≤45 years; EOCRLM), intermediate- (46-70 years; IOCRLM), and late-onset (>70 years; LOCRLM) groups. The prognostic role of RAS was assessed based on age group.

A total of 1189 patients were enrolled: 162 in the EOCRLM group, 930 in the IOCRLM group, and 97 in the LOCRLM group. No difference in disease-free survival (DFS) was found between the three groups. However, EOCRLM were more likely to develop extrahepatic and extrapulmonary metastasis and had significantly lower five-year OS rates than IOCRLM. After IPTW, EOCRLM remained a negative prognostic predictor. RAS mutations were significantly associated with worse survival than wild-type RAS in EOCRLM and IOCRLM. However, RAS mutation did not predict the prognosis of patients with LOCRLM.

Patients with EOCRLM had a significantly lower OS than IOCRLM patients and age influences the prognostic power of RAS status. These findings may be helpful for doctors to guide the clinical treatments and develop follow-up strategies.

The role of adjuvant chemotherapy in resected stage II colon cancer remains controversial. Treatment recommendations rely largely on the presence of certain high-risk features for recurrence.

We sought to define patient and clinicopathologic differences between early-onset and late-onset colorectal cancer and determine whether these differences impact treatment. We hypothesized that high-risk features in stage II colorectal cancer differed between age groups and would most strongly influence administration of adjuvant chemotherapy.

This was a retrospective cohort study.

The study was conducted at a Commission on Cancer designated hospital as well as the National Cancer Institute Intramural Research Program.

Patients with resected stage II colon cancer were identified in the National Cancer Database, and clinicopathologic characteristics were recorded. Patients were stratified into young (≤45), middle-aged (50-75), and older (>75) age groups.

Incidence of high-risk clinicopathologic features and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy were measured.

A total of 14,966 patients met inclusion criteria. Young patients were found to have had at least one high-risk feature ( n = 489, 44%) slightly more often than both middle-aged ( n = 3734, 40%) and older patients ( n = 1890, 42%). A total of 332 (7%) older patients received adjuvant chemotherapy compared to 627 (56%) young patients and 2854 (30%) middle-aged patients. Age group was independently associated with receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy when controlling for relevant clinicopathologic factors.

This was a retrospective study without granular detail on treatment decisions.

Young patients are frequently prescribed adjuvant chemotherapy for both high- and low-risk tumors despite questionable benefit in the latter. Older patients rarely receive adjuvant therapy. Both medical and surgical oncologists should be aware of disparities in cancer treatment and remain conscientious about making treatment decisions solely based on age. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B846 .

ANTECEDENTES:El papel de la quimioterapia adyuvante en el cáncer de colon resecado en estadio II sigue siendo controversial . Las recobmendaciones para el tratamiento dependen en gran medida de la presencia de ciertas características de alto riesgo de recurrencia.OBJETIVO:Buscamos definir las diferencias clínico-patológicas del paciente entre el CCR de inicio temprano y tardío; y determinar si estas diferencias afectan el tratamiento. Hipotetizamos que las características de alto riesgo del cáncer colorrectal en estadio II difieren entre los grupos de edad y que influyen fuertemente en la administración de quimioterapia adyuvante.DISEÑO:Este fue un estudio de cohorte retrospectivo.ENTORNO CLINICO:El estudio se llevó a cabo en un hospital designado por la Comisión sobre el Cáncer, así como el Programa de Investigación Intramural del Instituto Nacional del Cáncer.PACIENTES:Se identificaron los pacientes con cáncer de colon resecado en estadio II en la Base de datos nacional del cáncer y se registraron las características clínico-patológicas. Los pacientes se estratificaron en grupos de edad jóvenes (≤45), de mediana edad (50-75) y mayores (> 75).PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Se estudiaron la incidencia de las características clínico-patológicas de alto riesgo y la recepción de quimioterapia adyuvante.RESULTADOS:Un total de 14.966 pacientes cumplieron con los criterios de inclusión. Se encontró que los pacientes jóvenes tenían al menos una característica de alto riesgo (n = 489, 44%) un poco más frecuente que los pacientes de mediana edad (n = 3734, 40%) y los pacientes mayores (n = 1890, 42%). Un total de 332 (7%) de los pacientes mayores recibieron quimioterapia adyuvante en comparación con 627 (56%) de los pacientes jóvenes y 2854 (30%) de los pacientes de mediana edad. El grupo de edad se asoció de forma independiente con la recepción de quimioterapia adyuvante al controlar los factores clínico-patológicos relevantes.LIMITACIONES:Este fue un estudio retrospectivo sin detalles granulares sobre las decisiones de tratamiento.CONCLUSIONES:A los pacientes jóvenes se les prescribe con frecuencia quimioterapia adyuvante para tumores de alto y bajo riesgo, a pesar de los cuestionables beneficios en estos últimos. Los pacientes de edad avanzada rara vez reciben terapia adyuvante. Tanto los oncólogos clínicos como los quirúrgicos deben ser conscientes de las disparidades en el tratamiento del cáncer y ser conscientes de tomar decisiones de tratamiento basadas únicamente en la edad. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B846 . (Traducción- Dr. Francisco M. Abarca-Rendon ).

Over the past several decades, the incidence of early-onset cancers, often defined as cancers diagnosed in adults <50 years of age, in the breast, colorectum, endometrium, oesophagus, extrahepatic bile duct, gallbladder, head and neck, kidney, liver, bone marrow, pancreas, prostate, stomach and thyroid has increased in multiple countries. Increased use of screening programmes has contributed to this phenomenon to a certain extent, although a genuine increase in the incidence of early-onset forms of several cancer types also seems to have emerged. Evidence suggests an aetiological role of risk factor exposures in early life and young adulthood. Since the mid-20th century, substantial multigenerational changes in the exposome have occurred (including changes in diet, lifestyle, obesity, environment and the microbiome, all of which might interact with genomic and/or genetic susceptibilities). However, the effects of individual exposures remain largely unknown. To study early-life exposures and their implications for multiple cancer types will require prospective cohort studies with dedicated biobanking and data collection technologies. Raising awareness among both the public and health-care professionals will also be critical. In this Review, we describe changes in the incidence of early-onset cancers globally and suggest measures that are likely to reduce the burden of cancers and other chronic non-communicable diseases.