Programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors combined with chemotherapy have become a standard first-line treatment for advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Given the high costs associated with immunotherapy, evaluating the cost-effectiveness of different PD-1 inhibitors in the Chinese healthcare setting is essential for guiding treatment decisions and policy development.

A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted comparing six PD-1 inhibitors-sintilimab, toripalimab, tislelizumab, camrelizumab, serplulimab, and pembrolizumab-combined with chemotherapy for first-line treatment of advanced ESCC. A partitioned survival model was used to calculate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) from healthcare system perspective, with a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold set at $36,598.19 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the robustness of the results.

The ICERs for toripalimab, camrelizumab, pembrolizumab, serplulimab, sintilimab, and tislelizumab were $32,356.79/QALY, $48,410.64/QALY, $312,743.54/QALY, $121,200.84/QALY, $29,663.42/QALY, and $35,304.33/QALY, respectively. Sintilimab, toripalimab, and tislelizumab were below the WTP threshold. Among all regimens, the top three in life years (LYs) gained were toripalimab, serplulimab, and tislelizumab. Sensitivity analysis showed that utility values and drug prices were key factors influencing ICERs. Probabilistic analysis indicated that toripalimab, sintilimab, and tislelizumab had the highest probabilities of being cost-effective, at 83.1%, 81.4%, and 70.0%, respectively.

Sintilimab, toripalimab, and tislelizumab are the most cost-effective PD-1 inhibitors when combined with chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of advanced ESCC in China, with ICERs below the WTP threshold. While all six PD-1 inhibitors demonstrated clinical benefits, pembrolizumab and serplulimab were less favourable from a cost-effectiveness standpoint. Sensitivity analysis confirmed that drug prices and utility values are significant determinants of cost-effectiveness.

Improving pathological complete response (pCR) rate is currently the main goal of neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LA-ESCC). However, improved pCR rates do not consistently translate into better prognosis, likely due to regimen-specific pCR heterogeneity. We investigated this heterogeneity and potential biomarkers between two common neoadjuvant regimens.

We included 445 LA-ESCC patients from four centers, with 228 receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and 217 undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy (nICT). Propensity score matching ensured group comparability. We assessed pCR rates and their associations with overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and recurrence patterns. Immune-related biomarkers were investigated through RNA sequencing and immune infiltration analysis, then validated via multiplex immunofluorescence staining.

Overall, pCR was associated with significantly higher DFS (HR = 0.3 [0.18-0.5], P < 0.01) and OS (HR = 0.19 [0.08-0.41], P < 0.01) compared to non-pCR. The nICT group had a lower pCR rate than the nCRT group (27.2% vs. 42.9%) but demonstrated comparable prognosis and reduced distant metastasis. Among pCR patients, DFS was significantly better in the nICT group (HR = 0.2 [0.05-0.86], P = 0.031), with a trend toward improved OS. Immune analysis revealed increased CD8 + T cell infiltration, particularly CD69 + CD8 + tissue-resident memory T cells (TRM), in the nICT pCR group. The proportion of CD69 + CD8 + TRM cells was significantly linked to improved DFS (P = 0.016) and OS (P = 0.015), suggesting they may be superior prognostic markers compared to pCR rates.

The pCR obtained from different neoadjuvant treatments has distinct prognostic outcomes. The CD69 + CD8 + TRM, as a potential prognostic predictor, warrants further investigation.

To explore the recurrence pattern and risk factors associated with the relapse of thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (TESCC) among patients who received esophagectomy following neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT).

A total of 191 TESCC patients who received esophagectomy following NICT were retrospectively reviewed from 2019 to 2022. The first recurrence patterns were assessed. The postoperative recurrence-free survival (RFS) was determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate recurrence risk factor analysis was performed using the logistic regression model.

As of the December 31, 2023 follow-up, 66 patients experienced recurrence, with a median time to recurrence of 10.8 months (1.2-37.3 months). The recurrence pattern included locoregional recurrence (LR), distant recurrence (DR), and LR + DR, accounting for 69.7 %, 16.7 %, and 13.6 %, respectively. Locoregional lymph node (LN) predominated the pattern of postoperative recurrence (40/66), particularly in the mediastinal station 2R (17.5 %) and 4R (16.5 %). The 2-year RFS rates for groups with dissected LN stations of ≤6, 7-9, and 10-14 were 50.5 %, 72.3 %, and 63.5 %, respectively (P = 0.04). Similarly, the 2-year RFS rates for groups with dissected LNs of <15, 15-29, and ≥30 were 49.7 %, 61.6 %, and 71.6 %, respectively (P = 0.28). Furthermore, tumor length >5 cm, the T-stage evaluation as clinically stable disease, dissected LN stations ≤6, and the ypN2-3 stage were unfavorable factors for postoperative failure in patients.

The major pattern of LR may be LN recurrence after NICT in TESCC patients, particularly in the station 2R and 4R. In addition, less than 6 LN dissection stations or less than 15 LNs are not recommended.

Immunotherapy has been confirmed efficient in recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), but its role in the locoregionally advanced setting is undetermined. Previous evidence in non-endemic areas of NPC is also lacking. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of induction chemotherapy plus camrelizumab followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for patients with locoregionally advanced NPC in non-endemic areas.

In this phase 2 trial, patients born and living in North China with untreated stage III to IVa NPC were enrolled. All patients received two 21-day cycles of camrelizumab (200 mg) plus docetaxel (75 mg/m2) and cisplatin (75 mg/m2), followed by intensity modulated radiotherapy and concurrent cisplatin (80 mg/m2 for two 21-day cycles). After CCRT, patients received camrelizumab maintenance for 12 cycles. The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate.

From February 2021 to September 2023, a total of 57 patients were included for analysis. The objective response rate was 92.8% after induction therapy and 100% after CCRT. With a median follow-up time of 21 months, the 3-year DFS rate was 84%. The 3-year locoregional recurrence-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and overall survival rates were 95.8%, 90.9%, and 89.5%, respectively. The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were leukopenia and neutropenia during induction therapy, and weight loss and lymphopenia during CCRT.

Induction immunochemotherapy combined with CCRT shows promising antitumor activity with a manageable safety profile in patients with locoregionally advanced NPC from non-endemic areas, which deserves further validation.

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04782765.

Immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy has improved outcomes for some esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients, but accurate pre-treatment risk stratification remains a critical gap. This study constructed a deep learning (DL) model to predict survival outcomes in ESCC patients receiving immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy.

A DL model was developed to predict survival outcomes in ESCC patients receiving immunotherapy and chemotherapy. Retrospective data from 482 patients across three institutions were split into training (N=322), internal test (N=79), and external test (N=81) sets. Unenhanced computed tomography (CT) scans were processed to analyze tumor and peritumoral regions. The model evaluated multiple input configurations: original tumor regions of interest (ROIs), ROI subregions, and ROIs expanded by 1 and 3 pixels. Performance was assessed using Harrell's C-index and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. A multimodal model combined DL-derived risk scores with five key clinical and laboratory features. The Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) method elucidated the contribution of individual features to model predictions.

The DL model with 1-pixel peritumoral expansion achieved the best accuracy, yielding a C-index of 0.75 for the internal test set and 0.60 for the external test set. Hazard ratios for high-risk patients were 1.82 (95% CI: 1.19-2.46; P=0.02) in internal test set. The multimodal model achieved C-indices of 0.74 and 0.61 for internal and external test sets, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed significant survival differences between high- and low-risk groups (P<0.05). SHAP analysis identified tumor response, risk score, and age as critical contributors to predictions.

This DL model demonstrates efficacy in stratifying ESCC patients by survival risk, particularly when integrating peritumoral imaging and clinical features. The model could serve as a valuable pre-treatment tool to facilitate the implementation of personalized treatment strategies for ESCC patients undergoing immunotherapy and chemotherapy.

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a highly heterogeneous and aggressive malignancy. The progression, invasiveness, and metastatic potential of ESCC are shaped by a multitude of cells within the tumor microenvironment (TME), including tumor cells, immune cells, endothelial cells, as well as fibroblasts and other cell types. Recent advancements in single-cell sequencing technologies have significantly enhanced our comprehension of the diverse landscape of ESCC. Single-cell multi-omics technology, particularly single-cell transcriptome sequencing, have shed light on the expression profiles of individual cells and the molecular characteristics of distinct tumor cell populations. This review summarizes the latest literature on single-cell research in the field of ESCC, aiming to elucidate the heterogeneity of tumor cells, immune cells, and stromal cells at the single-cell level. Furthermore, it explores the impact of cellular interactions within the TME on the progression of ESCC. By compiling a comprehensive overview of single-cell omics research on ESCC, this article aims to enhance our understanding of ESCC diagnosis and treatment by elucidating the intricate interplay within the TME. It explores the cellular composition, spatial arrangement, and functional attributes of the ESCC TME, offering potential therapeutic targets and biomarkers for personalized treatment strategies.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced, resectable esophageal cancer.

Literature published before November 2023 on the clinical efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma was searched in CNKI, VIP, Wanfang, Chinese Biomedical Literature, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and the Web of Science. A meta-analysis was conducted using Stata 17.0.

The cumulative ranked probability results indicated that Camrelizumab + TN had the highest probability of achieving pCR, Camrelizumab + TP of achieving MPR, and Sintilimab + TP of achieving DCR and ORR. Camrelizumab + TP also had the highest probability of achieving an R0 resection rate. In terms of adverse events and postoperative complications, Pembrolizumab + TN had the highest likelihood of inducing myelosuppression and rash. Toripalimab + TP had the highest probability of inducing vomiting, while traditional chemotherapy alone had the highest likelihood of inducing postoperative cardiac adverse events.

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy has demonstrated superior clinical efficacy and safety compared to chemotherapy alone. The regimen of Camrelizumab + TP showed significant advantages in pCR, MPR, DCR, and R0 resection rates, particularly excelling in MPR and R0 resection rates. However, it was associated with a higher incidence of rash compared to chemotherapy alone and the Toripalimab + TP regimen. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy, when combined with chemotherapy, has been shown to reduce the occurrence of postoperative cardiac adverse events. Among the various treatment options, Sintilimab + TP exhibited the most favorable outcomes.

PROSPERO Protocol Number: CRD42024623160.

This study aimed to develop a multi-modality model by incorporating pretreatment computed tomography (CT) radiomics and pathomics features along with clinical variables to predict pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer (EC).

A total of 223 EC patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy followed by surgical intervention between August 2021 and December 2023 were included in this study. Radiomics features were extracted from contrast-enhanced CT images using PyrRadiomics, while pathomics features were derived from whole-slide images (WSIs) of pathological specimens using a fine-tuned deep learning model (ResNet-50). After feature selection, three single-modality prediction models and a combined multi-modality model integrating two radiomics features, 11 pathomics features, and two clinicopathological features were constructed using the support vector machine (SVM) algorithm. The performance of the models were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Shapley values were also utilized to explain the prediction model.

The predictive capability of the multi-modality model in predicting pCR yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75-1.00), outperforming the radiomics model (AUC 0.70 [95% CI 0.54-0.85]), pathomics model (AUC 0.77 [95% CI 0.53-1.00]), and clinical model (AUC 0.63 [95% CI 0.46-0.80]). Additionally, both the calibration plot and DCA curves support the clinical utility of the integrated multi-modality model.

The combined multi-modality model we propose can better predict the pCR status of esophageal cancer and help inform clinical treatment decisions.

Neoadjuvant therapy is preferentially recommended for resectable locally advanced esophageal malignancies, with patients who achieve pathological complete response (PCR) anticipated to have longer survival rates. The aim of this study was to compare 3-year follow-up data for patients with esophageal malignancy who achieved PCR through neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCRT) and to compare the findings with those of neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy (nICT).

This retrospective study included 85 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent surgical resection following nCRT (n=47) or nICT (n=38) between January 1, 2016 and January 1, 2020 at Fujian Medical University Union Hospital and Gaozhou People's Hospital. Propensity score matching was used to match baseline data and reduce bias between the patient groups. Data during the neoadjuvant treatment and perioperative periods were compared, and follow-up was performed to evaluate differences in 3-year survival rate and recurrence-free survival.

After propensity score matching, 28 nCRT patients and 38 nICT patients were included. During neoadjuvant therapy, the nCRT group had higher incidences of leukopenia and neutropenia than did the nICT group. No significant differences were observed in the incidences of hemoglobin decrease, platelet decrease, liver function damage, elevated serum creatinine, diarrhea, radioactive pneumonia or immunotherapy-related pneumonia, and esophageal perforation. The nCRT group had fewer lymph node dissections and lymph node stations. Postoperative lung infection (50.00%) was significantly higher in the nICT group than in the nCRT group (25.00%). The 3-year survival rates were 97.37% and 85.71% in the nICT and nCRT groups, respectively; the 3-year recurrence-free survival rate was significantly lower in the nCRT group (82.14%) than in the nICT group (97.37%, P=0.02).

These findings suggest that patients with esophageal cancer who achieve PCR after nICT treatment may have lower rates of disease recurrence.

This study aimed to compare the difference in perioperative outcomes and prognosis between neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

The patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma receiving neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy were identified from a prospectively maintained database at Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University between January 2018 and March 2022. Propensity score matching was performed to balance the 2 groups.

A total of 124 patient pairs were enrolled in the final analysis. The complete pathological response rate (20.2% vs 29.0%, P = .140) was similar in the 2 groups, whereas the lower major pathological response rate (44.4% vs 61.3%, P = .011) was observed in the neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy group. Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy was associated with a lower rate of adverse events (42.7% vs 55.6%, P = .047) without additional postoperative complications (38.7% vs 35.5%, P = .693). The neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy group had lower distant metastasis (6.5% vs 16.1%, P = .027) and overall recurrence (11.3% vs 23.4%, P = .019) in the postoperative 1 year. Also, neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy was associated with better progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.32-0.77; P = .002). Cox proportional hazard analysis showed that neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (univariable: hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.37-0.82; P = .003; multivariable: hazard ratio, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.29-0.65; P < .001) was one of the independent prognostic factors for progression-free survival. The 2 groups had similar overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.36-1.09; P = .094) at the latest follow-up.

This retrospective study showed that neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy was safe and effective for patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Further verification is needed in randomized controlled trials.

Radiotherapy resistance is one of the main reasons for the dismal clinical outcome of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Therefore, clarifying the targets and molecular mechanisms of radiotherapy resistance in ESCC is of great theoretical and clinical significance to enhance the efficacy of radiotherapy. In this study, GPR37 was identified as a key factor facilitating ESCC radiosensitization. We found that GPR37 is lowly expressed in ESCC, especially in radioresistant ESCC tumors. And its insufficiency is related to the malignant characteristics and unfavorable prognosis in ESCC. Further investigation revealed that GPR37 level is inversely regulated by promoter methylation but positively regulated by ZNF750. Functionally, GPR37 could not only overcome radioresistance of ESCC, but also inhibit proliferation, migration, and invasion. Mechanistically, GPR37 interacts with the ATP1A1 protein, effectively promoting its ubiquitination-induced degradation, thereby limiting the activation of the AKT/mTOR signaling pathway. Additionally, GPR37 can be transported to recipient cells via exosomes and inhibit the malignant behavior of recipient cells. Overall, these findings suggest that GPR37-ATP1A1 axis holds potential as a therapeutic target for the management of ESCC, especially for overcoming radiation resistance.

Esophageal cancer (EC) is an aggressive malignancy with a poor prognosis, ranking seventh in incidence and sixth cancer-related deaths globally. EC is classified in two main types, the esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), with ESCC being more common in Eastern Europe, South Asia, and Africa, while EAC is prevalent in Western Europe and North America. Molecular analysis identifies three subgroups of ESCC, each with distinct genetic mutations and treatment responses. Early-stage EC is often difficult to detect, leading to late-stage diagnoses that necessitate systemic drug therapies, including molecular-targeted therapies and immunotherapies. Immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitor, has shown promising results in improving survival rates for metastatic or persistent EC. It is particularly important to target to multidisciplinary combination therapies, integrating surgery, chemoradiotherapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy. Additionally, radioimmunotherapy is being explored for its potential to enhance treatment efficacy, especially in advanced and metastatic tumors. However, the pathological complete response rate to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy remains suboptimal, highlighting the need for novel treatment strategies. Future research should focus on optimizing treatment combinations and identifying predictive biomarkers to improve clinical outcomes for EC patients.

The role of immunotherapy in the adjuvant setting seems promising in recent years. As per the findings of the CheckMate 577 trial, patients with esophageal cancer (EC) who had neoadjuvant chemoradiation with residual pathologic disease should be considered adjuvant immunotherapy (AIT). However, it is unknown if individuals with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who have received neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT) followed by radical surgery also require AIT.

A retrospective analysis was performed on the data from patients who underwent NICT and radical surgery for ESCC between 2019 and 2020. To compare disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), Kaplan-Meier survival curves were produced. To determine the parameters linked to DFS and OS, a Cox model using hazard ratios (HRs) was completed.

Among the 292 eligible patients, 215 cases with a mean age of 63.3 ± 6.8 years, including 190 (88.4%) men and 25 (11.6%) women, were finally recruited. The percentage of R0 resection was 98.3%. After NICT, 65 (30.2%) patients achieved pathological complete response. AIT was given to 78 (36.3%) patients following radical resection. For all patients, the 3-year DFS and OS were 62.3% and 74.0%, respectively. In terms of 3-year DFS (61.5% vs. 62.8%, P=0.984) or OS (76.9% vs. 72.3%, P=0.384), no statistically significant difference was found between patients with and without AIT. AIT significantly improved survival in patients with ypT+N+ (DFS: 23.9% vs. 38.5%, P=0.036; OS: 37.0% vs. 61.5%, P=0.010), but not in those with ypT0N0 or ypT+N0. It was found that AIT was related to both DFS (HR: 0.297; P<0.001) and OS (HR: 0.321; P=0.001) in patients with ypT+N+.

In ypT+N+ ESCC patients, AIT after NICT followed by radical surgery reduces the recurrence and death, thereby improving the DFS and OS. Randomized controlled trials ought to be conducted to further assess the results of this retrospective investigation.

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and construct a prognostic model.

Clinical data were retrospectively collected from patients with locally advanced ESCC who received neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy. The primary endpoints were major pathologic remission rate and disease-free survival, and secondary endpoints were treatment-related adverse events and perioperative complications. Correlates affecting pathological response were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression, survival-related variables were screened by Boruta and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator Cox regression analysis. A nomogram was constructed and utilized to test the predictive efficacy of the treatment with receiver operating characteristic curve and decision curve analysis.

A total of 181 patients were enrolled, of whom 119 (66 %) patients received 3-4 cycles of treatment. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 65.2 % of the patients, with 13.3 % experiencing severe complications. Major pathological remission rate was achieved in 68 (37.6 %) patients, with no significant difference between the treatment cycle groups (P=0.925). The nomogram included pathologic TNM stage, lymphovascular invasion, post-treatment and post-surgery albumin levels, and post-treatment systemic immune-inflammation index. One-year disease-free survival area under the curve was 0.86 (95 %CI, 0.75-0.97) in the derivation cohort and 0.75 (95 %CI, 0.50-0.99) in the validation cohort, with good calibration performance.

Pathological staging combined with albumin level and systemic immune-inflammation index could be a superior predictor of survival prognosis in ESCC patients receiving neoadjuvant immunotherapy. The findings of this study yield new evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in ESCC and provide a tool for identifying patients at risk of recurrence.

Anastomotic leakage (AL) remains a major complication after esophagectomy, especially in patients with esophagogastric cancers who have undergone neoadjuvant therapies, which can impair tissue healing. Endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure (EndoVAC) is an innovative approach aimed at managing AL by facilitating wound drainage, reducing infection, and promoting granulation tissue formation, thus supporting effective healing. This review explores the role and effectiveness of EndoVAC in treating AL post-esophagectomy in esophageal cancer patients. We present an overview of its physiological principles, including wound contraction, enhanced tissue perfusion, and optimized microenvironment, which collectively accelerate wound closure. In addition, we examine clinical outcomes from recent studies, which indicate that EndoVAC is associated with improved leak resolution rates and potentially shorter hospital stays compared to traditional methods. Overall, this review highlights EndoVAC as a promising tool for AL management and underscores the need for continued investigation to refine its protocols and broaden its accessibility. By optimizing EndoVACs use, multidisciplinary teams can improve patient outcomes and advance esophageal cancer care.

This study aimed to explore the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor camrelizumab for the treatment of locally advanced esophageal cancer.

This was a retrospective analysis. 87 patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer were included who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus immunotherapy between June 2018 and April 2021 in our oncology department. The postoperative clinical outcomes and varying expressions of PD-1 were evaluated in all enrolled patients.

The post-treatment disease control rate (DCR) was 83.91%, and the objective response rate (ORR) was 59.77%. Cancer tissues were categorized based on PD-1 expression into PD-1 negative (39 cases) and PD-1 positive (33 cases), with a PD-1 positive rate of 45.83%. Patients with PD-1-positive tumors exhibited a significantly higher ORR compared to those with PD-1-negative tumors, although DCRs did not differ significantly between the groups. The 12-month progression-free survival rate was significantly higher in PD-1-positive patients. In contrast, no significant difference was found in the 12-month overall survival rate between the two groups. The incidence of grade III adverse events was 10.34%, and no grade IV or higher adverse events were observed.

In patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus immunotherapy demonstrates good efficacy and safety, especially for PD-1-positive patients, and significantly improves prognosis.

Screening for Barrett's esophagus (BE) remains controversial, even for high-risk populations. Our study aimed to evaluate the proportion of patients diagnosed with esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) who were not screened for BE or did not receive recommended BE surveillance screening. We then evaluated the relationship between cancer staging and screening/surveillance opportunities.

This single-center retrospective study included 187 patients from January 2016 to January 2022 with newly diagnosed EAC. Data extracted from patient charts included BE risk factors, and BE, endoscopic, and histologic history.

A total of 187 patients had a new diagnosis of EAC. Among this group, 44% had appropriate BE surveillance adherence, and 47% of patients met the criteria for BE screening but had not been screened prior to EAC diagnosis. Adherence to BE surveillance was associated with earlier stages of cancer on biopsy. No significant difference in cancer staging was found in those with missed BE screening opportunities.

Patients with a diagnosis of BE who adhered to surveillance guidelines had earlier stage EAC at diagnosis, which emphasizes the importance of surveillance. Most of those with an initial diagnosis of EAC had not received any BE screening.

Despite the recognized therapeutic potential of programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), their role in neoadjuvant therapy and reliable efficacy biomarkers remain elusive.

We retrospectively analyzed locally advanced ESCC patients who underwent surgery following a 2-cycle platinum and paclitaxel-based treatment, with or without PD-1 inhibitors (January 2020-March 2023). We assessed peripheral blood indexes and tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) density to evaluate their impact on pathological response and prognosis, leading to a clinical prediction model for treatment efficacy and survival.

Of the 157 patients recruited, 106 received immunochemotherapy (ICT) and 51 received chemotherapy (CT) alone. The ICT group demonstrated a superior pathological response rate (PRR) (47.2% vs. 29.4%, p = 0.034) with comparable adverse events and postoperative complications. The ICT group also showed a median disease-free survival (DFS) of 39.8 months, unattained by the CT group. The 1-year DFS and overall survival (OS) rates were 73% and 91% for the ICT group, and 68% and 81% for the CT group, respectively. We found higher baseline activated T cells, lower baseline Treg cells, and a decreased posttreatment total lymphocyte and CD4+/CD8+ ratio predicted an enhanced PRR. Reduced posttreatment CD4+/CD8+ ratio and increased NK cells were associated with prolonged survival, while higher TLS density indicated poorer prognosis. Among ICT group, a lower posttreatment CD4+/CD8+ ratio indicated longer DFS and reduced posttreatment B cells indicated longer OS. A nomogram integrating these predictors was developed to forecast treatment efficacy and survival.

The combination of PD-1 inhibitors and chemotherapy appears promising for locally advanced ESCC. Evaluating the differentiation status and dynamic changes of peripheral blood immune cells may provide valuable predictive insights into treatment efficacy and prognosis.

Recent single-arm studies involving neoadjuvant camrelizumab, a PD-1 inhibitor, plus chemotherapy for resectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LA-ESCC) have shown promising results. This multicenter, randomized, open-label phase 3 trial aimed to further assess the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus chemotherapy followed by adjuvant camrelizumab, compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone. A total of 391 patients with resectable thoracic LA-ESCC (T1b-3N1-3M0 or T3N0M0) were stratified by clinical stage (I/II, III or IVA) and randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to undergo two cycles of neoadjuvant therapy. Treatments included camrelizumab, albumin-bound paclitaxel and cisplatin (Cam+nab-TP group; n = 132); camrelizumab, paclitaxel and cisplatin (Cam+TP group; n = 130); and paclitaxel with cisplatin (TP group; n = 129), followed by surgical resection. Both the Cam+nab-TP and Cam+TP groups also received adjuvant camrelizumab. The dual primary endpoints were the rate of pathological complete response (pCR), as evaluated by a blind independent review committee, and event-free survival (EFS), as assessed by investigators. This study reports the final analysis of pCR rates. In the intention-to-treat population, the Cam+nab-TP and Cam+TP groups exhibited significantly higher pCR rates of 28.0% and 15.4%, respectively, compared to 4.7% in the TP group (Cam+nab-TP versus TP: difference 23.5%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 15.1-32.0, P < 0.0001; Cam+TP versus TP: difference 10.9%, 95% CI 3.7-18.1, P = 0.0034). The study met its primary endpoint of pCR; however, EFS is not yet mature. The incidence of grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events during neoadjuvant treatment was 34.1% for the Cam+nab-TP group, 29.2% for the Cam+TP group and 28.8% for the TP group; the postoperative complication rates were 34.2%, 38.8% and 32.0%, respectively. Neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus chemotherapy demonstrated superior pCR rates compared to chemotherapy alone for LA-ESCC, with a tolerable safety profile. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry identifier: ChiCTR2000040034 .

This study evaluated the perioperative outcomes for patients who had locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) treated with neoadjuvant immunotherapy (IO) and chemotherapy versus a matched cohort of patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) alone.

A single-center non-randomized phase 2 trial was undertaken with locally advanced (cT3-4 and/or N+) EAC, and 49 patients completed neoadjuvant avelumab + docetaxel, cisplatin, 5FU (DCF) and esophagectomy between February 2018 and February 2020. These patients were matched with contemporary patients (January 2018 to June 2020) who met the inclusion criteria but received neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone (NAC) with a comparable docetaxel-based therapy. The postoperative outcomes then were compared between the two groups.

For this study, 99 patients with locally advanced EAC underwent esophagectomy and met the enrolment criteria. Of these patients, 50 received NAC alone and 49 received IO + NAC. Baseline characteristics such as age, gender, and clinical stage were comparable between the two groups. Operative approach and rate of minimally invasive esophagectomy (~ 60%) were similar in the two groups. For the NAC-alone and IO + NAC groups, the respective overall and major complication rates were similar between the two groups (50% vs. 51% [p = 0.91] and 20% vs. 26% [p = 0.44], respectively), with concordant rates for anastomotic leak (6 [12%] vs. 6 [12%]; p = 0.86) and respiratory complications (13 [26%] vs. 11 [22%]; p = 0.68). The two groups did not differ significantly in terms of hospital length of stay or 30- and 90-day mortality rates.

The addition of immunotherapy to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma does not appear to alter perioperative short-term outcomes significantly after esophagectomy.

Background/Objectives: Recently, pembrolizumab plus 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin (FP), nivolumab plus FP, and nivolumab plus ipilimumab have become the first-line treatments for patients with advanced esophageal cancer. However, the treatment efficacy in primary tumors has not been reported. We assessed the outcomes of these treatments in advanced esophageal cancer, specifically focusing on esophageal dysphagia improvements and the primary tumor response. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted between October 2021 and November 2023. We investigated 23 patients with esophageal cancer and dysphagia who received an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) plus FP or nivolumab plus ipilimumab. Results: The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.0-12.5), and the median overall survival was not reached (95%CI: 13.0-NA). Improvement in dysphagia was observed in 19/23 (82.6%) patients, with a median time to improvement of 26 days (range: 15-77 days) and a median dysphagia PFS of 12.6 months (range: 8.1-NA months). Ten patients experienced immune-related adverse events (irAEs): seven had interstitial pneumonia, and three had thyroid dysfunction, pituitary dysfunction, and rash, respectively. Conclusions: Although there was a high frequency of irAEs, ICI for esophageal cancer achieved high response rates and prolonged survival. The observed improvement in dysphagia suggests the potential efficacy of the treatment against primary tumors.

With the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), a better understanding of tumor microenvironment (TME) is becoming crucial in managing esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients. We investigated the survival impact of TME status and changes in patients with ESCC who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by surgery (n = 264). We examined immunohistochemical status (CD4+, CD8+, CD20+, Foxp3+, HLA class-1+, CD204+, and programmed death ligand-1 [PD-L1+]) on 264 pre-NAC and 204 paired post-NAC specimens. Patients were classified by their pre- and post-NAC immune cell status and their changes following NAC. Our findings showed that pre-NAC TME status was not significantly associated with survival outcomes. In contrast, post-NAC TME status, such as low level of T cells, CD4+ T cells, and high PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS), were significantly associated with poor overall survival (OS). Notably, TME changes through NAC exerted significant survival impacts; patients with consistently low levels of T cells, low levels of CD4+ T cells, or high levels of PD-L1 (CPS) had very poor OS (3-year OS: 35.5%, 40.2%, and 33.3%, respectively). Tumor microenvironment changes of consistently low T cells, low CD4+ T cells, and high PD-L1 were independent predictors of poor OS in multivariate Cox hazards analyses, while factors indicating post-NAC status (T cells, CD4+, and PD-L1 [CPS]) alone were not. Therefore, we suggest that the consistently low T/high PD-L1 group could benefit from additional therapies, such as ICIs, and the importance of stratification by the TME, which has recently been recognized.

The chemotherapy and immunotherapy combination is currently the primary strategy to treat metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (NCIT) is being intensively investigated for treating locally advanced ESCC.

We compared the efficacy and safety of NCIT and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) to treat locally advanced ESCC.

We included 214 locally advanced ESCC patients who were administered neoadjuvant therapy from May 2014 to April 2022. The patients were grouped according to two neoadjuvant protocols (NCIT and NCRT) routinely used at our institution. Perioperative findings, pathological results, and survival data were compared between the two groups by conducting unmatched and 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) analyses.

Following 1:1 PSM analysis of the confounders, 66 patients were allocated to each of the two groups. Time span between neoadjuvant therapy completion and esophagectomy was significantly longer after NCRT than that after NCIT (47.1 ± 13.2 days vs. 34.7 ± 8.8 days; p < 0.001). The NCIT group exhibited significantly greater number of harvested lymph nodes than the NCRT group (33.6 ± 12.7 vs. 21.7 ± 10.2; p < 0.001). The pathological complete response and major pathological response rates were similar between the two groups [NCIT group: 25.8% (17/66) and 62.1% (41/66), respectively; NCRT group: 27.3% (18/66) and 56.1% (37/66), respectively (p > 0.05)]. The overall incidence of pneumonia, anastomotic leakage, or postoperative complications did not differ significantly between the two groups. The 2-year cumulative overall survival rates and the 2-year disease-free survival rates of the NCIT and NCRT groups were 80.2% and 62.2%, respectively (p = 0.029) and 70.0% and 50.8%, respectively (p = 0.023).

In locally advanced ESCC patients, short-term survival after NCIT is superior to that after NCRT, with similar perioperative and pathological outcomes.

The safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (nICT) for locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) remain controversial.

Patients with LAGC who received either nICT or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) at 3 tertiary referral teaching hospitals in China between January 2016 and October 2022 were analyzed. After propensity-score matching (PSM), comparing the radiological response, pathological response rate, perioperative outcomes, and early recurrence between the two groups.

After PSM, 585 patients were included, with 195 and 390 patients comprising the nICT and nCT groups, respectively. The nICT group exhibited a higher objective response rate (79.5% vs. 59.0%; P <0.001), pathological complete response rate (14.36% vs. 6.41%; P =0.002) and major pathological response rate (39.49% vs. 26.15%; P =0.001) compared with the nCT group. The incidence of surgical complications (17.44% vs. 16.15%, P =0.694) and the proportion of perioperative textbook outcomes (80.0% vs. 81.0%; P =0.767) were similar in both groups. The nICT group had a significantly lower proportion of early recurrence than the nCT group (29.7% vs. 40.8%; P =0.047). Furthermore, the multivariable logistic analysis revealed that immunotherapy was an independent protective factor against early recurrence [odds ratio 0.62 (95% CI 0.41-0.92); P =0.018]. No significant difference was found in neoadjuvant therapy drug toxicity between the two groups (51.79% vs. 45.38%; P =0.143).

Compared with nCT, nICT is safe and effective, which significantly enhanced objective and pathological response rates and reduced the risk for early recurrence among patients with LAGC.

Clinical Trials.gov.

Esophageal cancer (ESCA) is one of the most common tumors in the world, and treatment using neoadjuvant therapy (NT) based on radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy has still unsatisfactory results. Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT) has also become an effective treatment strategy nowadays. However, its impact on the tumor microenvironment (TME) and regulatory mechanisms on T cells and NK cells needs to be further elucidated.

A total of 279 cases of ESCA who underwent surgery alone [non-neoadjuvant therapy (NONE)], neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT), and NICT were collected, and their therapeutic effect and survival period were compared. Further, RNA sequencing combined with biological information was used to analyze the expression of immune-related genes. Immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, and quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) were used to verify the activation and infiltration status of CD8+ T and CD16+ NK cells, as well as the function and regulatory pathway of killing tumor cells.

Patients with ESCA in the NICT group showed better clinical response, median survival, and 2-year survival rates (p < 0.05) compared with the NCT group. Our RNA sequencing data revealed that NICT could promote the expression of immune-related genes. The infiltration and activation of immune cells centered with CD8+ T cells were significantly enhanced. CD8+ T cells activated by PD-1 inhibitors secreted more IFN-γ and cytotoxic effector factor cells through the transcription factor of EOMES and TBX21. At the same time, activated CD8+ T cells mediated the CD16+ NK cell activation and secreted more IFN-γ to kill ESCA cells. In addition, the immunofluorescence co-staining results showed that more CD276+ tumor cells and CD16+ NK cells were existed in pre-NCT and pre-NICT group. However, CD276+ tumor cells were reduced significantly in the post-NICT group, while they still appeared in the post-NCT group, which means that CD16+ NK cells can recognize and kill CD276+ tumor cells after immune checkpoint blocker (ICB) treatment.

NICT can improve the therapeutic effect and survival period of resectable ESCA patients. NICT could promote the expression of immune-related genes and activate CD8+ T and CD16+ NK cells to secrete more IFN-γ to kill ESCA cells. It provides a theoretical basis and clinical evidence for its potential as an NT strategy in ESCA.

To investigate the relationship between the Scottish inflammatory prognostic score (SIPS), treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), and prognostication in patients with neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

A retrospective investigation was carried out on 208 ESCC patients treated with NICT. The relationships between the SIPS, TRAEs, and prognosis [disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS)] were analyzed.

The patients, comprising 62 (29.8%) cases of SIPS0, 103 (49.5%) cases of SIPS1, and 43 (20.7%) cases of SIPS2, were categorized into three groups based on SIPS. Among patients with SIPS2, the oldest age (P=0.006), lowest BMI (P=0.001), longest tumor length (P=0.001), most advanced ypT stage (P=0.014), and ypN stage (P<0.001) were identified. Pathological complete response (PCR) rates showed statistically significant variations between the three groups (SIPS0: 45.2%, SIPS1: 27.2%, SIPS2: 16.3%, P=0.004). All TRAEs were found in 63.9% (133 cases) of the cases, with serious TRAEs (grade 3-4) accounting for 13.9% (29 cases). TRAEs themselves were not linked with SIPS (P=0.668), while serious TRAEs had a significant correlation with SIPS (P=0.002). Multivariate logistic analysis showed that SIPS2 seemed to confer serious TRAEs [odds radio (OR)=4.044; 95% CI: 1.395-11.722; P=0.010]. For patients classified as SIPS0, 1, or 2, the 3-year DFS was 83.9%, 58.3%, and 39.5% (P<0.001). The 3-year OS for those with SIPS0, 1, or 2 was 88.7%, 72.8%, and 53.5%, respectively (P<0.001). SIPS was substantially correlated with DFS (but not with OS) and could be utilized as an independent predictor [SIPS2: hazard ratio (HR)=3.743, 95% CI: 1.770-7.914, P=0.001; SIPS1: HR=2.303, 95% CI: 1.149-4.616, P=0.019].

The SIPS is associated with serious TRAEs and can be used as a predictor of serious TRAEs in ESCC receiving NICT. SIPS may be employed for pretreatment assessment since it was found to be substantially correlated with DFS.

The current National Comprehensive Cancer Network advises neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for locally advanced cases of esophageal cancer. The role of immunotherapy in this context is under heavy investigation.

Patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma were identified in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2004 to 2019. Three groups were generated as follows: (a) no immunotherapy, (b) neoadjuvant immunotherapy, and (c) adjuvant immunotherapy. Overall survival was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard analysis, adjusting for previously described risk factors for mortality.

Of the total 14,244 patients diagnosed with esophageal adenocarcinoma who received neoadjuvant chemoradiation, 14,065 patients did not receive immunotherapy, 110 received neoadjuvant immunotherapy, and 69 received adjuvant immunotherapy. When adjusting for established risk factors, adjuvant immunotherapy was associated with significantly improved survival compared to no immunotherapy and neoadjuvant immunotherapy during a median follow-up period of 35.2 months. No difference was noted among patients who received no immunotherapy vs. neoadjuvant immunotherapy in the same model.

In this retrospective analysis of the NCDB, receiving adjuvant immunotherapy offered a significant survival advantage compared to no immunotherapy and neoadjuvant immunotherapy in the treatment of esophageal adenocarcinoma. The addition of neoadjuvant immunotherapy to patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation did not improve survival in this cohort. Further studies are warranted to investigate the long-term outcomes of immunotherapy in esophageal cancer.

The current standard of care for locally advanced esophageal and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancers includes neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or perioperative chemotherapy with surgical resection; however, disease-free survival in these patients remains poor. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are approved for adjuvant treatment of locally advanced esophageal and GEJ cancers, but their benefit in the perioperative and neoadjuvant settings remains under investigation.

We used the PubMed online database to conduct a literature search to identify studies that investigated immunotherapy for locally advanced esophageal and GEJ carcinoma. A review of ClinicalTrials.gov yielded a list of ongoing trials.

Adjuvant nivolumab for residual disease after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery is the only approved immunotherapy regimen for locally advanced esophageal cancer. Early-phase trials investigating the addition of neoadjuvant or perioperative ICIs to standard-of-care multimodality approaches have observed pathologic complete response rates as high as 60%. Response rates are highest for ICIs plus chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and dual checkpoint inhibition in mismatch repair-deficient adenocarcinomas. Safety profiles are acceptable, with a pooled adverse event rate of 27%. Surgical morbidity and mortality with immunotherapy are similar to historical controls with no immunotherapy, and R0 resection rates are high. When reported, disease-free survival among patients treated with perioperative immunotherapy is promising.

Outside of clinical trials, immunotherapy for resectable esophageal carcinoma is limited to the adjuvant setting. Phase III trials investigating neoadjuvant and perioperative immunotherapy are now underway and will provide much-needed data on survival that may ultimately lead to practice-changing recommendations.