Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Sep 25, 2015; 7(13): 1088-1095
Published online Sep 25, 2015. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i13.1088
Published online Sep 25, 2015. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i13.1088
Admission risk marker | Score component value |
Blood urea, mmol/L | |
6.5 to ≤ 8 | 2 |
8.0 to < 10.0 | 3 |
10.0 to < 25 | 4 |
≥ 25 | 6 |
Hemoglobin for men, g/dL | |
12.0-13.0 | 1 |
10.0 to < 12.0 | 3 |
< 10.0 | 6 |
Hemoglobin for women, g/dL | |
10.0 to < 12.0 | 1 |
10 | 6 |
Systolic blood pressure, mmHg | |
100-109 | 1 |
90-99 | 2 |
< 90 | 3 |
Other markers | |
Pulse ≥ 100/min | 1 |
Presentation with melena | 1 |
Presentation with syncope | 2 |
Hepatic disease | 2 |
Cardiac failure | 2 |
Variables | Score 0 | Score 1 | Score 2 | Score 3 |
Age | Younger than 60 yr | 60-79 yr | 80 yr or older | - |
Shock symptoms, systolic blood pressure, heart rate | Shock absent, blood pressure 100 mmHg or greater, heart rate 100 bpm or greater | Tachycardia, blood pressure 100 mmHg or greater, heart rate 100 bpm or greater | Hypotension, blood pressure less than 100 mmHg | - |
Comorbidities | No major comorbidity | - | Heart failure, coronary artery disease, any major comorbidity | Renal failure, liver failure, disseminated malignancy |
Endoscopic diagnosis | Mallory-Weiss tear or no lesion identified, and no stigmata of recent hemorrhage | All other diagnoses | Malignancy of upper GI tract | - |
Stigmata of recent hemorrhage | Low-risk | - | High-risk | - |
We recommend that patients with UGIB be adequately resuscitated before endoscopy |
We recommend antisecretory therapy with PPIs for patients with bleeding caused by peptic ulcers or in those with suspected peptic ulcer bleeding awaiting endoscopy |
We suggest prokinetic agents in patients with a high probability of having fresh blood or a clot in the stomach when undergoing endoscopy |
We recommend endoscopy to diagnose the etiology of acute UGIB. The timing of endoscopy should depend on clinical factors. Urgent endoscopy (within 24 h of presentation) is recommended for patients with a history of malignancy or cirrhosis, presentation with hematemesis, and signs of hypovolemia including hypotension, tachycardia and shock, and a hemoglobin < 8 g/dL |
We recommend endoscopic therapy for peptic ulcers with high-risk stigmata (active spurting, visible vessel). The management of PUD with an adherent clot is controversial. Recommended endoscopic treatment modalities include injection (sclerosants, thrombin, fibrin, or cyanoacrylate glue), cautery, and mechanical therapies |
We recommend against epinephrine injection alone for peptic ulcer bleeding. If epinephrine injection is performed, it should be combined with a second endoscopic treatment modality (e.g., cautery or clips) |
We recommend that patients with low-risk lesions be considered for outpatient management |
We recommend against routine second-look endoscopy in patients who have received adequate endoscopic therapy |
We recommend repeat endoscopy for patients with evidence of recurrent bleeding |
- Citation: Szura M, Pasternak A. Upper non-variceal gastrointestinal bleeding - review the effectiveness of endoscopic hemostasis methods. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 7(13): 1088-1095
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v7/i13/1088.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v7.i13.1088