Kampf G, Fliss PM, Martiny H. Is peracetic acid suitable for the cleaning step of reprocessing flexible endoscopes? World J Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 6(9): 390-406 [PMID: 25228941 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v6.i9.390]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Dr. Günter Kampf, Professor, Bode Science Center, Bode Chemie GmbH, Melanchthonstrasse 27, 22525 Hamburg, Germany. guenter.kampf@bode-chemie.de
Research Domain of This Article
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Article-Type of This Article
Review
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Sep 16, 2014; 6(9): 390-406 Published online Sep 16, 2014. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v6.i9.390
Table 1 Typical sequence of steps for manual and automatic reprocessing of flexible endoscopes including the typical duration of the various cleaning steps
Manual processing
Automatic processing
Pre-cleaning the outer surface with a detergent-soaked single-use gauze and rinsing all channels with the cleaning agent, usually for 2 min
Brush-cleaning all accessible channels with a suitable brush, usually for 3 min
Rinsing
Chemical cleaning; filling all channels with the cleaning agent, allowing the cleaning agents to persist inside the channel for approximately 5 min
Rinsing, usually for 1 min
Disinfection
Final rinsing
Drying
Table 2 Outbreaks and pseudo-outbreaks reported in connection with biofilm or peracetic acid-based processing of flexible endoscopes
Number/type of infection(s)
Pathogen(s)
Type of endoscopic procedure
Reason for outbreak / pseudo-outbreak
Peracetic acid-based formulations were used for
Ref.
None (pseudo-outbreak)
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Gastroscopy, bronchoscopy
Suboptimal duration of glutaraldehyde application during disinfection; “resistance” to glutaraldehyde may have been enhanced by manual cleaning with peracetic acid-based disinfectant[214]
Cleaning step
[202]
2: infection (not further specified)3: colonization
OXA-48 Klebsiella pneumoniae
Bronchoscopy
A problem with the washer disinfector or the cleaning procedure was assumed as the reason
Cleaning step and disinfection step (Gastmeier P, personal communication)
[203]
4: pneumonia (3 cases); colonization (1 case)
MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Gastroscopy
Insufficient initial cleaning, shortening of the immersion time and brushing time, insufficient channel flushing, and inadequate drying prior to storage
Adaptation of microorganisms surviving the cleaning step
Likely, especially in gram-negative bacteria
Insufficient efficacy of disinfection step, persistence of pathogens, beginning of biofilm formation
Cross-resistance to other biocidal compounds as a result of exposure to sublethal peracetic acid concentrations
Possible
Insufficient efficacy of disinfection step, persistence of pathogens, beginning of biofilm formation
Table 6 Practical tips to ensure optimal cleaning of flexible endoscopes
Clinical practice tip
Major advantage
Ref.
Clean promptly after use
No drying of organic material such as blood
[77,207]
Follow the instructions of the endoscope manufacturer as closely as possible (e.g., type of brush or cleaning adapter)
Optimum cleaning of an entire channel
Prefer washer disinfectors with a monitoring system indicating channel blockage
A blocked channel cannot be cleaned adequately and is immediately identified; targeted brush cleaning may be necessary
Do not switch off the monitoring system for detection of blocked channels
Channels may be blocked and inadequately cleaned; personnel may not detect blocked channels with all possible implications for patient safety
Support by gastroenterologist
It is strongly recommended that the clinician fully understands the cleaning and disinfection steps and does not inhibit his or her staff's ability to perform them correctly
[240]
Allow external audits by local health authorities on the quality of processing including cleaning
Implementation of guidelines may be more successful if the local health authorities visit the endoscopy units and compare current practices with the relevant guidelines. This effect seems to be more easily achieved in in-patient rather than in out-patient endoscopy units
[241-243]
Citation: Kampf G, Fliss PM, Martiny H. Is peracetic acid suitable for the cleaning step of reprocessing flexible endoscopes? World J Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 6(9): 390-406