Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Mar 16, 2026; 18(3): 114327
Published online Mar 16, 2026. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v18.i3.114327
Published online Mar 16, 2026. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v18.i3.114327
Table 1 Endoscopic grading of acute caustic injury as per the Zargar’s classification
| Endoscopic grading | Findings |
| Grade 0 | Normal findings |
| Grade 1 | Edema and hyperemia of the mucosa |
| Grade 2a | Superficial localized ulcerations, friability, hemorrhage and blisters |
| Grade 2b | Deep ulcerations (either discrete or circumferential), in addition to friability, hemorrhage, and superficial ulcerations |
| Grade 3a | Small, scattered areas of necrosis |
| Grade 3b | Extensive necrosis |
Table 2 Computed tomography grading of acute caustic injury as per the Ryu and Chirica classification
| Grade | CT findings | Clinical implication |
| Ryu classification | ||
| Grade 1 | No definite swelling of esophagus wall (< 3 mm, within normal limit) | No injury |
| Grade 2 | Edematous wall thickening (> 3 mm) without periesophageal soft tissue infiltration | Usually mild injury; often managed conservatively; low risk of complications |
| Grade 3 | Edematous wall thickening with periesophageal soft tissue infiltration plus well-demarcated tissue interface | Moderate injury; risk of stricture formation; close monitoring required |
| Grade 4 | Edematous wall thickening with periesophageal | Severe injury; high risk of progression; surgical evaluation considered |
| Soft tissue infiltration plus blurring of the tissue | ||
| Interface or localized fluid collection around esophagus or descending aorta | ||
| Chirica classification | ||
| Grade 1 | Normal appearing GI tract | No injury |
| Grade 2 | Wall edema, surrounding soft tissue inflammation and increased postcontrast wall enhancement | Mild to moderate risk of injury; moderate to high risk of stricture formation |
| Grade 3 | Transmural necrosis, as shown by the absence of postcontrast wall enhancement with surrounding soft tissue inflammation | Moderate injury; risk of stricture formation; close monitoring required |
Table 3 Benefits and limitations of esophagogastroduodenoscopy and computed tomography scan in caustic injury
| Parameters | EGD | CT scan |
| Easy availability | - | - |
| Can be used for Zargar grading for steroid therapy | - | - |
| Visualization of the entire GIT and other systems | - | - |
| Easily identifies perforation | - | - |
| Identifies the candidates for emergency surgery | - | - |
| Facilitates insertion of the feeding tube | - | - |
| Risk of radiation | No | Yes |
| Validity beyond 48-72 hours of ingestion | - | - |
- Citation: Singh AK, Birda CL, Kochhar R. Optimizing triage in acute caustic ingestion: Choosing between endoscopy and computed tomography. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2026; 18(3): 114327
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v18/i3/114327.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v18.i3.114327
