Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Jul 16, 2025; 17(7): 107168
Published online Jul 16, 2025. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i7.107168
Published online Jul 16, 2025. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i7.107168
Table 1 Comparative analysis of the main agents for colonoscopic preparation
Mechanism of action | Adverse events | Advantages | Limitations | Administration scheme | |
Oral Lactulose | Non-absorbable disaccharide fermented by colonic bacteria producing an increase in osmotic pressure and stimulating peristalsis | Nausea; Vomiting; Flatulence | Very low volume regimen for colonoscopic preparation. Good tolerability. Low cost Does not produce significant electrolyte alterations. Safe in patients with comorbidities | Little scientific evidence for its use in colonoscopic preparation | Single dose on the same day of the procedure (6 hours before the colonoscopy); 200 mL of lactulose diluted in 600 mL of water + simethicone |
Sodium picosulfate + magnesium citrate | Diphenylmethane type stimulant laxative that after being hydrolyzed by colonic bacteria in its active form directly stimulates the submucosal plexus of Meissner in the colon, causing increased colonic motility and decreased reabsorption of water and electrolytes | Nausea; Vomiting; Headache | Low volume regimen for colonoscopic preparation. Good tolerability | High cost; Contraindicated in severe kidney failure (due to magnesium content) | Split doses: One dose the night before and the other the morning of the procedure; Each dose followed by at least 500 mL of clear liquids |
Magnesium citrate | Osmotic salt that produces an increase of the intraluminal osmotic pressure in the colon inducing a dragging of water into the bowel lumen and increased motility | Contraindicated in kidney failure | Good tolerability; Low cost | Little scientific evidence for its use in colonoscopic preparation | Split doses: One dose the night before (300 mL) and the other the morning of the procedure (300 mL); Each dose followed by at least 250 mL of clear liquids |
Sodium phosphate (NaP) | Hyperosmotic laxative that attracts water into the bowel lumen stimulating peristalsis | Hyperphosphatemia Hypocalcemia; Hypokalemia; Cardiac arrhythmias Phosphate nephropathy | Low volume regimen for colonoscopic preparation. Good tolerability; Fast action | Contraindicated in kidney failure; Congestive heart failure; Liver cirrhosis | Split doses: One dose the night before (45 mL) and the other the morning of the procedure (45 mL); Each dose followed by at least 500 mL of clear liquids |
Polyethylene glycol | Non-absorbable inert polymer producing water retention at the intraluminal colonic level and increased peristalsis | Nausea; Vomiting; Abdominal distention | Does not produce significant electrolyte alterations. Safe in patients with comorbidities | Requires high volume intake; Unpleasant taste | Split doses: One dose the night before (2 L) and the other the morning of the procedure (2 L); Low volume alternatives can be combined with other available agents |
Table 2 Comparative table of world-wide outcomes in colonoscopic preparation using oral lactulose
Ref. | Boston bowel preparation score | Colorectal adenoma detection rate | Inadequate bowel preparation | Side effects | Disagreeable flavor | Satisfactory overall experience |
Aliaga Ramos et al[31] | 8.36 ± 1.09 | 59.5% (66/111) | 1.8% (2/111) | 46.8% (52/111) | 3.6% (4/111) | 62.2% (69/111) |
Wenqi et al[27] | 7.19 ± 1.19 | 50.0% (100/200) | Not specified | 6.5% (13/200) | Not specified | Not specified |
Jagdeep et al[29] | 6.25 ± 0.786 | Not specified | Not specified | 50% (10/20) | 10% (2/20) | Not specified |
Li et al[33] | 7.95 ± 1.40 | 30.7% (27/88) | Not specified | 39.7% (35/88) | 0% | 8.91 ± 1.34 |
- Citation: Aliaga Ramos J, Carvalho D, Nunes Arantes V. Innovative schemes of colonoscopy bowel preparation with oral lactulose: Optimizing traditional standards to improve colonoscopy quality. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2025; 17(7): 107168
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v17/i7/107168.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v17.i7.107168