Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Jun 16, 2025; 17(6): 107142
Published online Jun 16, 2025. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i6.107142
Published online Jun 16, 2025. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i6.107142
Table 1 Risk of bias for all the included studies
Study ID | Randomization process | Deviations from intended interventions | Missing outcome data | Measurement of outcomes | Selection of reported results | Overall risk of bias |
RCT1 | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk |
RCT2 | Low risk | Some concerns | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Some concerns |
RCT3 | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk |
RCT4 | Some concerns | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Some concerns |
RCT5 | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk |
RCT6 | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk |
RCT7 | Some concerns | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Some concerns |
RCT8 | Low risk | Low risk | Some concerns | Low risk | Low risk | Some concerns |
RCT9 | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk |
RCT10 | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk |
RCT11 | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk |
RCT12 | Low risk | Some concerns | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Some concerns |
RCT13 | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk |
RCT14 | Some concerns | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Some concerns |
RCT15 | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk |
RCT16 | Low Risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk |
RCT17 | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk |
Table 2 Summarizes the results of the pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis across all outcomes
Outcome | Number of studies | Pairwise meta-analysis (OTSC vs CT) | Pairwise meta-analysis (HP vs CT) | Pairwise meta-analysis (OTSC vs HP) | I² (%) | Network meta-analysis (OTSC vs CT) | Network meta-analysis (HP vs CT) | Network meta-analysis (OTSC vs HP) |
30-day rebleeding rate | 8 | 0.47 (0.33-0.65) | 0.73 (0.45-1.13) | 0.56 (0.30-1.05) | 0.0 | 0.41 (0.25-0.63) | 0.73 (0.45-1.13) | 0.56 (0.30-1.05) |
Short-term rebleeding rate | 8 | 0.43 (0.23-0.80) | 0.62 (0.28-1.35) | 0.59 (0.17-1.67) | 0.0 | 0.35 (0.14-0.74) | 0.62 (0.28-1.35) | 0.59 (0.17-1.67) |
Initial hemostasis rate | 8 | 1.09 (0.99-1.20) | 1.13 (0.99-1.35) | 1.08 (0.89-1.40) | 0.0 | 1.20 (1.06-1.57) | 1.13 (0.99-1.35) | 1.08 (0.89-1.40) |
Necessity of salvage therapy | 8 | 1.31 (0.66-2.60) | 1.41 (0.50-3.95) | 0.95 (0.24-3.98) | 0.0 | 1.34 (0.55-3.53) | 1.41 (0.50-3.95) | 0.95 (0.24-3.98) |
All-cause mortality rate | 8 | 0.61 (0.35-1.06) | 0.99 (0.51-1.77) | 0.55 (0.22-1.45) | 0.0 | 0.54 (0.27-1.06) | 0.99 (0.51-1.77) | 0.55 (0.22-1.45) |
Bleeding-related mortality rate | 8 | 0.37 (0.10-1.34) | 0.44 (0.10-1.92) | 0.90 (0.07-10.89) | 0.0 | 0.32 (0.05-1.45) | 0.44 (0.10-1.92) | 0.90 (0.07-10.89) |
Table 3 Subgroup analysis comparing outcomes of over-the-scope clip therapy vs conventional therapy across different bleeding etiologies
Subgroup | Outcome | Pooled RR (OTSC/CT) | 95%CI | P value |
Peptic ulcer | 30-day rebleeding | 0.404 | 0.292-0.559 | 0.0001 |
Short-term rebleeding | 0.434 | 0.286-0.66 | 0.0001 | |
Initial hemostasis | 1.016 | 0.998-1.034 | 0.0774 | |
Surgical/TAE necessity | 1.122 | 0.603-2.087 | 0.7171 | |
30-day mortality | 0.844 | 0.506-1.406 | 0.5138 | |
Bleeding mortality | 0.741 | 0.14-3.922 | 0.7241 | |
Tumor | 30-day rebleeding | 0.581 | 0.322-1.05 | 0.0719 |
Short-term rebleeding | 0.47 | 0.237-0.934 | 0.0312 | |
Initial hemostasis | 1.04 | 0.987-1.095 | 0.1447 | |
Surgical/TAE necessity | 0.697 | 0.228-2.13 | 0.5263 | |
30-day mortality | 0.361 | 0.173-0.753 | 0.0066 | |
Bleeding mortality | 0.163 | 0.019-1.383 | 0.0964 | |
Other | 30-day rebleeding | 0.5 | 0.315-0.792 | 0.0032 |
Short-term rebleeding | 0.635 | 0.336-1.201 | 0.1628 | |
Initial hemostasis | 1.033 | 0.966-1.105 | 0.34 | |
Surgical/TAE necessity | 2.154 | 0.833-5.57 | 0.1136 | |
30-day mortality | 1.147 | 0.568-2.314 | 0.7021 | |
Bleeding mortality | 1.0 | 0.02-49.913 | 1.0 |
- Citation: Duggal S, Kalra I, Kalra K, Bhagat V. Advancing hemostasis: A meta-analysis of novel vs conventional endoscopic therapies for non variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2025; 17(6): 107142
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v17/i6/107142.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v17.i6.107142