Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Jun 16, 2025; 17(6): 107142
Published online Jun 16, 2025. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i6.107142
Table 1 Risk of bias for all the included studies
Study ID
Randomization process
Deviations from intended interventions
Missing outcome data
Measurement of outcomes
Selection of reported results
Overall risk of bias
RCT1Low riskLow riskLow riskLow riskLow riskLow risk
RCT2Low riskSome concernsLow riskLow riskLow riskSome concerns
RCT3Low riskLow riskLow riskLow riskLow riskLow risk
RCT4Some concernsLow riskLow riskLow riskLow riskSome concerns
RCT5Low riskLow riskLow riskLow riskLow riskLow risk
RCT6Low riskLow riskLow riskLow riskLow riskLow risk
RCT7Some concernsLow riskLow riskLow riskLow riskSome concerns
RCT8Low riskLow riskSome concernsLow riskLow riskSome concerns
RCT9Low riskLow riskLow riskLow riskLow riskLow risk
RCT10Low riskLow riskLow riskLow riskLow riskLow risk
RCT11Low riskLow riskLow riskLow riskLow riskLow risk
RCT12Low riskSome concernsLow riskLow riskLow riskSome concerns
RCT13Low riskLow riskLow riskLow riskLow riskLow risk
RCT14Some concernsLow riskLow riskLow riskLow riskSome concerns
RCT15Low riskLow riskLow riskLow riskLow riskLow risk
RCT16Low RiskLow riskLow riskLow riskLow riskLow risk
RCT17Low riskLow riskLow riskLow riskLow riskLow risk
Table 2 Summarizes the results of the pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis across all outcomes
Outcome
Number of studies
Pairwise meta-analysis (OTSC vs CT)
Pairwise meta-analysis (HP vs CT)
Pairwise meta-analysis (OTSC vs HP)
I² (%)
Network meta-analysis (OTSC vs CT)
Network meta-analysis (HP vs CT)
Network meta-analysis (OTSC vs HP)
30-day rebleeding rate80.47 (0.33-0.65)0.73 (0.45-1.13)0.56 (0.30-1.05)0.00.41 (0.25-0.63)0.73 (0.45-1.13)0.56 (0.30-1.05)
Short-term rebleeding rate80.43 (0.23-0.80)0.62 (0.28-1.35)0.59 (0.17-1.67)0.00.35 (0.14-0.74)0.62 (0.28-1.35)0.59 (0.17-1.67)
Initial hemostasis rate81.09 (0.99-1.20)1.13 (0.99-1.35)1.08 (0.89-1.40)0.01.20 (1.06-1.57)1.13 (0.99-1.35)1.08 (0.89-1.40)
Necessity of salvage therapy81.31 (0.66-2.60)1.41 (0.50-3.95)0.95 (0.24-3.98)0.01.34 (0.55-3.53)1.41 (0.50-3.95)0.95 (0.24-3.98)
All-cause mortality rate80.61 (0.35-1.06)0.99 (0.51-1.77)0.55 (0.22-1.45)0.00.54 (0.27-1.06)0.99 (0.51-1.77)0.55 (0.22-1.45)
Bleeding-related mortality rate80.37 (0.10-1.34)0.44 (0.10-1.92)0.90 (0.07-10.89)0.00.32 (0.05-1.45)0.44 (0.10-1.92)0.90 (0.07-10.89)
Table 3 Subgroup analysis comparing outcomes of over-the-scope clip therapy vs conventional therapy across different bleeding etiologies
Subgroup
Outcome
Pooled RR (OTSC/CT)
95%CI
P value
Peptic ulcer30-day rebleeding0.4040.292-0.5590.0001
Short-term rebleeding0.4340.286-0.660.0001
Initial hemostasis1.0160.998-1.0340.0774
Surgical/TAE necessity1.1220.603-2.0870.7171
30-day mortality0.8440.506-1.4060.5138
Bleeding mortality0.7410.14-3.9220.7241
Tumor30-day rebleeding0.5810.322-1.050.0719
Short-term rebleeding0.470.237-0.9340.0312
Initial hemostasis1.040.987-1.0950.1447
Surgical/TAE necessity0.6970.228-2.130.5263
30-day mortality0.3610.173-0.7530.0066
Bleeding mortality0.1630.019-1.3830.0964
Other30-day rebleeding0.50.315-0.7920.0032
Short-term rebleeding0.6350.336-1.2010.1628
Initial hemostasis1.0330.966-1.1050.34
Surgical/TAE necessity2.1540.833-5.570.1136
30-day mortality1.1470.568-2.3140.7021
Bleeding mortality1.00.02-49.9131.0