Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Dec 16, 2025; 17(12): 112485
Published online Dec 16, 2025. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i12.112485
Published online Dec 16, 2025. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i12.112485
Table 1 Baseline patient and procedural characteristics (n = 50), n (%)
| Variable | Overall (n = 50) | FNA (n = 26) | FNB (n = 24) | P value |
| Gender | ||||
| Male | 20 (40.0) | 13 (50.0) | 7 (29.2) | 0.13 |
| Female | 30 (60.0) | 13 (50.0) | 17 (70.8) | |
| Age, mean (SD) | 43.9 (15.5) | 43.3 (15.6) | 44.7 (15.7) | 0.75 |
| Sedation | ||||
| Conscious sedation | 47 (94.0) | 26 (100) | 21 (87.5) | 0.06 |
| General anesthesia | 3 (6.0) | 0 (0) | 3 (12.5) | |
| Needle type | ||||
| FNA | 26 (52.0) | NA | NA | NA |
| FNB | 24 (48.0) | |||
| Number of needle passes, median (range) | 3 (2-5) | 4 (3-5) | 2 (2-5) | < 0.0001 |
| Liver lobe biopsied | ||||
| Left lobe | 48 (96.0) | 25 (96.2) | 23 (95.8) | 0.95 |
| Right lobe | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| Both lobes | 2 (4.0) | 1 (3.8) | 2 (4.2) | |
| Aspiration technique | ||||
| No suction | 25 (50.0) | 21 (80.8) | 4 (16.7) | < 0.0001 |
| Wet heparin suction | 25 (40.0) | 5 (19.2) | 20 (83.3) |
Table 2 Primary and secondary outcomes, n (%)
| Variable | Overall | FNA | FNB | P value |
| Diagnostic adequacy | ||||
| Yes | 43 (86.0) | 22 (84.6) | 21 (87.5) | |
| No | 7 (14.0) | 4 (15.4) | 3 (12.5) | 0.77 |
| Final histopathological diagnosis | ||||
| MASLD | 16 (32.0) | 8 (30.8) | 8 (33.3) | 0.94 |
| DILI | 12 (24.0) | 6 (23.1) | 6 (25.0) | |
| Hemosiderosis | 2 (4.0) | 1 (3.8) | 1 (4.2) | |
| AIH | 5 (10.0) | 3 (11.5) | 2 (8.3) | |
| PBC | 3 (6.0) | 1 (3.8) | 2 (8.3) | |
| PSC | 1 (2.0) | 1 (3.8) | 0 (0) | |
| Acute cellular rejection | 1 (2.0) | 0 (0) | 1 (4.2) | |
| Cholestasis | 2 (4.0) | 1 (3.8) | 1 (4.2) | |
| Sarcoid | 1 (2.0) | 1 (3.8) | 0 (0) | |
| Non-diagnostic | 7 (14.0) | 4 (15.4) | 3 (12.5) | |
| Complications | 1 (2.0) | 0 (0) | 1 (4.2) | 0.29 |
| Post procedure pain | 5 (10.0) | 2 (7.7) | 3 (12.5) | 0.57 |
| Fulfills EASL criteria | ||||
| Yes | 27 (54.0) | 7 (26.9) | 20 (83.3) | < 0.0001 |
| No | 23 (46.0) | 19 (73.1) | 4 (16.7) | |
| Fulfills AASLD criteria | ||||
| Yes | 17 (34.0) | 2 (7.7) | 15 (62.5) | < 0.0001 |
| No | 33 (66.0) | 24 (92.3) | 9 (37.5) | |
| Number of complete portal triads, mean (SD) | 17.1 (14.6) | 10.6 (9.6) | 24.1 (15.9) | 0.0006 |
| Length of longest specimen (mm), mean (SD) | 8.1 (8.0) | 2.2 (0.80) | 14.6 (8.4) | < 0.0001 |
| Total specimen length (mm), mean (SD) | 24.2 (23.8) | 9.4 (6.4) | 40.3 (25.4) | < 0.0001 |
Table 3 Multivariate logistic regression analysis of predictors of optimal diagnostic adequacy (adjusted for age and gender)
| Variable | Adjusted odds ratio | 95% confidence intervals | P value |
| Use of FNB needle | 1.2 | 0.2-6.5 | 0.24 |
| Use of wet heparin suction | 1.4 | 0.3-7.6 | 0.67 |
| Performing > 2 passes | 1.22 | 0.22-6.92 | 0.82 |
Table 4 Multivariate logistic regression analysis of predictors of optimal histopathological specimen according to European Association for the Study of Liver criteria (adjusted for age and gender)
| Variable | Adjusted odds ratio | 95% confidence intervals | P value |
| Use of FNB needle | 19.9 | 4.2-94.2 | < 0.0001 |
| Use of wet heparin suction | 7.8 | 2.1-29.1 | 0.002 |
| Performing > 2 passes | 0.10 | 0.02-0.47 | 0.003 |
Table 5 Multivariate logistic regression analysis of predictors of optimal histopathological specimen according to American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases criteria (adjusted for age and gender)
| Variable | Adjusted odds ratio | 95% confidence intervals | P value |
| Use of FNB needle | 19.9 | 3.6-108.6 | 0.001 |
| Use of wet heparin suction | 42.9 | 4.7-388.1 | 0.001 |
| Performing > 2 passes | 0.13 | 0.03-0.54 | 0.005 |
- Citation: Alali AA, Ali N, Hashim A, Alhaqqan D, Aljasser W, Almudaires A, Bastaki S, Alhashmi A, Altaleb A. Feasibility and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy to diagnose parenchymal liver disease: A multi-centre retrospective cohort study. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2025; 17(12): 112485
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v17/i12/112485.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v17.i12.112485
