BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Dec 16, 2025; 17(12): 110842
Published online Dec 16, 2025. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i12.110842
Table 1 Baseline characteristics and clinical features of patients with dysphagia referred to King Saud Medical City (2022-2023), n (%)
Baseline characteristics
Total study population (n = 168)
Early endoscopy (< 2 weeks) (n = 36)
Delayed endoscopy (≥ 2 weeks) (n = 45)
P value
Demographics
Age (years), mean ± SD45.7 ± 17.748.0 ± 17.744.2 ± 16.70.365
Male gender82 (50.0)19 (52.8)18 (40.0)0.356
Referral source
Family medicine116 (69.4)19 (52.8)38 (84.4)0.004
Emergency department19 (11.4)7 (19.4)0 (0.0)0.002
General surgery12 (7.2)5 (13.9)1 (2.2)0.083
Otorhinolaryngology7 (4.2)2 (5.6)3 (6.7)1
Oncology6 (3.6)1 (2.8)0 (0.0)0.444
Infectious diseases2 (1.2)1 (2.8)0 (0.0)0.444
Clinical features
Duration ≥ 4 weeks57 (44.5)18 (50.0)22 (48.9)1
Progressive dysphagia64 (48.5)15 (41.7)19 (42.2)1
Retrosternal location86 (66.7)28 (84.8)25 (58.1)0.024
Weight loss54 (42.2)14 (38.9)20 (44.4)0.782
Heartburn84 (64.6)23 (63.9)29 (64.4)1
Regurgitation76 (58.0)21 (58.3)25 (55.6)0.98
Chest pain47 (35.9)12 (33.3)16 (35.6)1
Globus sensation30 (23.4)3 (8.3)6 (13.3)0.724
Diagnostic workup
Manometry performed9 (8.5)13 (8.3)4 (8.9)1
24-hour pH study3 (2.3)11 (2.8)1 (2.2)1
Esophagogram performed65 (38.7)12 (33.3)18 (40.0)0.647
Final diagnoses
GERD76 (45.2)14 (38.9)20 (44.4)0.782
Eosinophilic esophagitis25 (14.8)0 (0.0)6 (13.3)0.031
Complicated GERD with stricture9 (5.4)8 (22.2)1 (2.2)0.009
Malignancy11 (6.5)1 (2.8)0 (0.0)0.444
Achalasia10 (5.9)1 (2.8)5 (11.1)0.219
Other diagnoses37 (22.0)12 (33.3)13 (28.9)0.809
Clinical outcomes
Improved outcome103 (61.3)23 (63.9)27 (60.0)0.898
Table 2 Association between the time of referral of cases presented with dysphagia and the outcome of management, n (%)

Final outcome
P value1
The same (n = 19)
Improved (n = 103)
Worsening (n = 7)
Wrong referral (n = 4)
Died (n = 3)
Time of referral to clinical assessment by gastroenterology department in weeks (n = 133)n = 18n = 0n = 0n = 3n = 2
≤ 2 hours (n = 72)6 (8.3)57 (79.2)6 (8.3)1 (1.4)2 (2.8)
3-hour (n = 22)4 (18.2)18 (81.8)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
> 4 hours (n = 39)8 (20.5)28 (71.8)1 (2.6)2 (5.1)0 (0.0)0.246
Time from referral to endoscopy in weeks (n = 132)n = 18n = 0n = 0n = 3n = 1
≤ 2 hours (n = 65)3 (4.6)55 (84.6)6 (9.2)0 (0.0)1 (1.5)
3-hour (n = 17)6 (35.3)10 (58.8)0 (0.0)1 (5.9)0 (0.0)
> 4 hours (n = 50)9 (18.0)38 (76.0)1 (2.0)2 (4.0)0 (0.0)0.012
Time from referral to esophagogram in weeks (n = 60)n = 11n = 47n = 0n = 2n = 0
≤ 2 hours (n = 30)3 (10.0)26 (86.7)0 (0.0)1 (3.3)0 (0.0)
3-hour (n = 6)3 (50.0)3 (50.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
> 4 hours (n = 24)5 (20.8)18 (75.0)0 (0.0)1 (4.2)0 (0.0)0.226
Time from clinical assessment to endoscopy in weeks (n = 129)n = 18n = 100n = 7n = 3n = 1
≤ 2 hours (n = 95)9 (9.5)77 (81.1)6 (6.3)2 (2.1)1 (1.1)
3-hour (n = 14)6 (42.9)6 (42.9)1 (7.1)1 (7.1)0 (0.0)
> 4 hours (n = 20)3 (15.0)17 (85.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0.046
Time from clinical assessment to esophagogram in weeks (n = 50)n = 10n = 39n = 0n = 1n = 0
≤ 2 hours (n = 29)3 (10.3)26 (89.7)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
3-hour (n = 8)4 (50.0)4 (50.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
> 4 hours (n = 13)3 (23.1)9 (69.2)0 (0.0)1 (7.7)0 (0.0)0.054
Table 3 Comparison of malignant and non-malignant cases of dysphagia regarding the outcome of management, n (%)

Non-malignant cases (n = 128)
Malignant cases (n = 6)
P value1
The same (n = 19)19 (14.8)0 (0.0)< 0.001
Improved (n = 101)101 (79.0)0 (0.0)
Worsening (n = 7)2 (2.3)4 (66.7)
Wrong referral (n = 4)4 (3.1)0 (0.0)
Died (n = 3)1 (0.8)2 (100)

  • Citation: AlQahtani KM, AlNasser AA, AlQahtani AM, AlTurki AA, Aljaili AK, Alamri AH, Owayed AS, Asiri YW, Bakkari SA, Jaddoh AM, Aldarsouny TA, Semaan TG, Elbayoumy MS, Alruzug IM, Alenezi AA, Bin-Ofaysan MS, Alsager MO, Alshahrani HS, Alhaddad SM, Almuhayzi HN, Almousa RA, Shehada AJ, AlMasri AA, Aldaher MK, Maaly ME, Hafez IM, Alzubide SR. Impact of referral delays on dysphagia outcomes in a Saudi tertiary center. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2025; 17(12): 110842
  • URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v17/i12/110842.htm
  • DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v17.i12.110842