Copyright
©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Sep 16, 2018; 10(9): 193-199
Published online Sep 16, 2018. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v10.i9.193
Published online Sep 16, 2018. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v10.i9.193
Table 1 Patient characteristics
Characteristics | Values |
Age median (range); yr | 51 (42-66) |
Sex male (%) | 35 (41) |
BMI median (range); kg/cm2 | 20.6 (18.6-22.8) |
Preoperative symptoms; n (%) | |
Weight loss | 44 (51) |
Chest pain | 51 (59) |
Dysphagia | 84 (98) |
Regurgitation | 78 (91) |
Previous interventions; n (%) (overlapping) | |
None | 44 (51) |
Pharmacological therapy | 21 (24) |
Endoscopic pneumatic balloon dilation | 20 (23) |
Surgical myotomy | 4 (5) |
Diagnosis; n (%) | |
Esophageal achalasia | 80 (93) |
Jackhammer esophagus | 5 (6) |
Diffuse esophageal spasm | 1 (1) |
Preoperative Eckardt score median (range); point | 6 (4-7) |
Table 2 Anesthetic and surgical factors
Parameters | Values |
Cricoid pressure; n (%) | 26 (46) |
Maintenance with inhalational agents; n (%) | 78 (91) |
Duration of anesthesia mean ± SD; min | 117 ± 31 |
Duration of surgery mean ± SD; min | 83 ± 31 |
Length of muscular incision | |
Esophageal side average ± SD; cm | 10.4 ± 3.9 |
Gastric side average ± SD; cm | 2.7 ± 0.7 |
Total average ± SD; cm | 13.1 ± 3.9 |
Perioperative adverse events; n (%) | |
Aspiration | 1 (1) |
Subcutaneous emphysema | 21 (24) |
EtCO2 > 50 mmHg during procedure | 34 (40) |
Upper abdominal needle decompression required | 12 (14) |
Airway pressure > 35 cmH2O during operation | 3 (3) |
Mucosal injury not requiring invasive treatment | 9 (10) |
Mediastinitis with antibiotic therapy | 1 (1) |
Hospital stay mean ± SD; d | 5.45 ± 2.18 |
Eckhart score 2 mo later; median (range); point | 0 (0–1) |
Table 3 Characteristics of three cases
Characteristics | Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 |
Age; yr | 74 | 61 | 73 |
Sex | Female | Male | Female |
BMI; kg/cm2 | 25.9 | 23.4 | 21.5 |
Preoperative symptoms | |||
Weight loss | Yes | None | None |
Chest pain | Yes | None | Yes |
Dysphagia | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Regurgitation | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Previous intervention | Pharmacological therapy | None | None |
Lower esophageal sphincter pressure; mmHg | 31 | 64 | 51 |
Diagnosis | Diffuse esophageal spasm | Jackhammer esophagus | Jackhammer esophagus |
Duration of anesthesia; minutes | 163 | 141 | 229 |
Maintenance of anesthesia | inhalation | inhalation | inhalation |
Length of muscular incision | |||
Esophageal side; cm | 18 | 15 | 19 |
Gastric side; cm | 3 | 3 | 4 |
Maximum EtCO2; mmHg | 67 | 63 | 177 |
Maximum peak airway pressure under 6-8 mL/kg volume controlled ventilation; mmHg | 37 | 40 | 46 |
Table 4 Review of anesthetic management of peroral endoscopic myotomy in the existing literature
Author | n | Preparation for POEM | Aspiration at induction | CO2-related complications |
Löser et al[9] | 173 | Liquid diet 2 to 5 d prior to POEM Nil per os overnight (for at least eight hours) Esophagoscopy was performed one day before POEM | None | Subcutaneous emphysema in 49 cases |
Pneumothorax in 1 case | ||||
Jayan et al[10] | 21 | Low residue diet 48 h before POEM Fasted from 20:00 on day before POEM | None | Subcutaneous emphysema in 5 cases |
Goudra et al[11] | 24 | Fasting times for both solids and liquids were variable | 1 | No comment |
Yang et al[12] | 52 | Clear liquid diet for 48 h before POEM Nil per os after midnight on day of POEM | None | Peak airway pressure > 35 cmH2O in 5 cases |
Tanaka[13] | 28 | Nil per os for 24 h before POEM Esophagoscopy was performed before induction of anesthesia | None | Subcutaneous emphysema in 1 case |
- Citation: Nishihara Y, Yoshida T, Ooi M, Obata N, Izuta S, Mizobuchi S. Anesthetic management and associated complications of peroral endoscopic myotomy: A case series. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 10(9): 193-199
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v10/i9/193.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v10.i9.193