BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Dec 16, 2025; 17(12): 114581
Published online Dec 16, 2025. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i12.114581
Figure 1
Figure 1 Internal hemorrhoid sites with evident bleeding. A: Grade III hemorrhoidal prolapse and several small spots of active bleeding (case 1); B: Rectal retroflexion of the colonoscope (case 1); C: Grade II hemorrhoidal prolapse and stigmas of recent bleeding (case 2); D: Rectal retroflexion of the colonoscope (case 2); E and F: Massive hemorrhoidal bleeding (case 3).
Figure 2
Figure 2 Comparative clinical outcomes of endoscopic vs rigid band ligation: From symptom distribution to patient satisfaction. A: Distribution of symptoms according to the type of ligation; B: Forest plot of the relative risks of clinical outcomes according to the type of ligation; C: Patient satisfaction after endoscopic and rigid banding ligation, bleeding and prolapse resolution. CI: Confidence interval.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Endoscopic band ligation. A: Grade III hemorrhoidal prolapse; B: Placement of 6 elastic bands above the dentate line; C: Rectal retroflexion after endoscopic band ligation; D: Complete resolution after 6 months.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Ulcers in the anal canal after rigid proctoscope band ligation. A-C: Placement of 4 elastic bands above the dentate line; D-F: Deep ulcers in the anal canal.