Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Nov 16, 2025; 17(11): 110030
Published online Nov 16, 2025. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i11.110030
Published online Nov 16, 2025. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i11.110030
Figure 1 Study selection process in the analysis of efficacy of endoscopy in patients with concomitant gastrointestinal bleeding and acute coronary syndrome-Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses.
Description: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses flow diagram summarizes the selection process for the studies included in the systematic review. A total of 4717 articles were identified through database searches. After removing duplicates, 3890 articles underwent title and abstract screening. Of these, 13 articles were selected for full-text review, and 4 articles met the inclusion criteria for the final analysis. Refer to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement for further details.
Figure 2 Risk of bias assessment.
Traffic-light plot of risk-of-bias assessment using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool, evaluating five domains.
- Citation: Calderon-Martinez E, Abreu Lopez B, Flores Monar G, Dave R, Teran Hooper C, Salolin Vargas VP, Shah YR, Patel R, Dahiya DS, Gangwani MK, Advani R. Effectiveness of endoscopy in patients with concomitant gastrointestinal bleeding and acute coronary syndrome: A systematic review. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2025; 17(11): 110030
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v17/i11/110030.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v17.i11.110030
