BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Nov 16, 2025; 17(11): 110030
Published online Nov 16, 2025. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i11.110030
Figure 1
Figure 1 Study selection process in the analysis of efficacy of endoscopy in patients with concomitant gastrointestinal bleeding and acute coronary syndrome-Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses. Description: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses flow diagram summarizes the selection process for the studies included in the systematic review. A total of 4717 articles were identified through database searches. After removing duplicates, 3890 articles underwent title and abstract screening. Of these, 13 articles were selected for full-text review, and 4 articles met the inclusion criteria for the final analysis. Refer to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement for further details.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Risk of bias assessment. Traffic-light plot of risk-of-bias assessment using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool, evaluating five domains.