Published online Mar 16, 2015. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i3.192
Peer-review started: July 16, 2014
First decision: November 3, 2014
Revised: December 4, 2014
Accepted: December 18, 2014
Article in press: December 19, 2014
Published online: March 16, 2015
Processing time: 247 Days and 22.9 Hours
Core tip: Several endoscopic approaches have recently been investigated for removing gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Endoscopic enucleation has several advantages. However, there is the possibility of peritoneal seeding when accidental perforation occurs. Furthermore, the rate of R0 resection is not yet acceptable. While endoscopic full-thickness resection has a more solid theoretical basis than endoscopic enucleation in terms of R0 resection, the possibility of tumor cell shedding into the peritoneum would increase when capsule injury results from the procedure. Compared with endoscopy only procedures, laparoscopy endoscopy cooperative surgery and LAFTR provide a higher complete resection rate and a more stable process, which are accordant with the purpose of minimally destructive surgeries.
