Chow CW, Haider SA, Ragunath K, Aithal GP, James MW, Ortiz-Fernandez-Sordo J, Aravinthan AD, Venkatachalapathy SV. Comparison of the reverse bevel versus Franseen type endoscopic ultrasound needle. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 12(9): 266-275 [PMID: 32994857 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v12.i9.266]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Suresh Vasan Venkatachalapathy, MBBS, MRCP, Doctor, National Institute for Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals National Health Service Trust and University of Nottingham, Derby Road, Nottingham NG2 7UH, United Kingdom. suresh.venkatachalapathy@nuh.nhs.uk
Research Domain of This Article
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Sep 16, 2020 (publication date) through Mar 3, 2026
Times Cited of This Article
Times Cited (0)
Journal Information of This Article
Publication Name
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
ISSN
1948-5190
Publisher of This Article
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
Share the Article
Chow CW, Haider SA, Ragunath K, Aithal GP, James MW, Ortiz-Fernandez-Sordo J, Aravinthan AD, Venkatachalapathy SV. Comparison of the reverse bevel versus Franseen type endoscopic ultrasound needle. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 12(9): 266-275 [PMID: 32994857 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v12.i9.266]
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Sep 16, 2020; 12(9): 266-275 Published online Sep 16, 2020. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v12.i9.266
Comparison of the reverse bevel versus Franseen type endoscopic ultrasound needle
Chi Wing Chow, Syeda Asma Haider, Krish Ragunath, Guruprasad P Aithal, Martin W James, Jacobo Ortiz-Fernandez-Sordo, Aloysious Dominic Aravinthan, Suresh Vasan Venkatachalapathy
Chi Wing Chow, Krish Ragunath, Guruprasad P Aithal, Martin W James, Jacobo Ortiz-Fernandez-Sordo, Aloysious Dominic Aravinthan, National Institute for Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals National Health Service Trust and University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2UH, United Kingdom
Syeda Asma Haider, Department of Pathology, Nottingham University Hospitals National Health Service Trust, Nottingham NG7 2UH, United Kingdom
Krish Ragunath, Guruprasad P Aithal, Aloysious Dominic Aravinthan, Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, United Kingdom
Suresh Vasan Venkatachalapathy, National Institute for Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals National Health Service Trust and University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG2 7UH, United Kingdom
Author contributions: Venkatachalapathy SV did the conception of the study, design of the study, writing of manuscript, critical review and overall supervision of the study; Chow CW did the design of the study, data gathering, statistical analysis of data, writing of manuscript and critical review; Haider SA reviewed cytology and did critical review; Ragunath K, Aithal GP, James MW, Ortiz-Fernandez-Sordo J designed the study and did critical review; Aravinthan AD did the statistical analysis of data, writing of manuscript and critical review.
Institutional review board statement: This study was reviewed and approved by the Nottingham University Hospitals National Health Service Trust review board.
Informed consent statement: The informed consent to the study was provided.
Conflict-of-interest statement: We have no financial relationships to disclose.
Data sharing statement: No additional data are available.
Corresponding author: Suresh Vasan Venkatachalapathy, MBBS, MRCP, Doctor, National Institute for Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals National Health Service Trust and University of Nottingham, Derby Road, Nottingham NG2 7UH, United Kingdom. suresh.venkatachalapathy@nuh.nhs.uk
Received: May 25, 2020 Peer-review started: May 25, 2020 First decision: June 4, 2020 Revised: June 8, 2020 Accepted: August 1, 2020 Article in press: August 1, 2020 Published online: September 16, 2020 Processing time: 108 Days and 6.2 Hours
ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS
Research background
Many factors can affect endoscopic ultrasound fine needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) procedures tissue acquisition efficacy, with needle type and design being one of the possible factors.
Research motivation
Currently, there is no direct comparison of tissue acquisition efficacy between reverse bevel (RB) and Franseen geometry (FG) needles.
Research objectives
To look any for different in tissue acquisition performance between RB and FG needles, which can potentially be a modifiable factor to improve EUS-FNB accuracy in making a confident diagnosis.
Research methods
A retrospective study of all EUS-FNA/FNB procedures by either 22G RB needle or 22G FG needle between January 2016 and February 2019. All cytology slides were reviewed by an independent gastrointestinal cytopathologist blinded to the needle used and the initial cytology report. The primary and secondary outcomes were to assess the sample adequacy using Euro-cytology criteria and the number of cell clusters, respectively.
Research results
A total of 226 procedures were included. RB needle was used in 128 procedures and FG needle in 98 procedures. The baseline characteristics of both groups were comparable. On multivariable analysis, FG needle (P = 0.02) and location of the lesion (P < 0.01) were independently associated with adequate. Further, the use of FG needle (P = 0.04) and the size of the lesion (P = 0.02) were independently associated with acquisition of increased number of cell clusters.
Research conclusions
FG needle is superior to RB needle in acquiring adequate tissue and attaining higher number of cell clusters for solid and mixed lesions.
Research perspectives
Multicentre prospective trials are needed to further evaluate the utility of different needle types.
