Brief Article
Copyright ©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. May 16, 2012; 4(5): 189-193
Published online May 16, 2012. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v4.i5.189
Anesthetic management for small bowel enteroscopy in a World Gastroenterology Organization Endoscopy Training Center
Somchai Amornyotin, Udom Kachintorn, Siriporn Kongphlay
Somchai Amornyotin, Siriporn Kongphlay, Department of Anesthesiology and Siriraj, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Center, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
Udom Kachintorn, Department of Medicine and Siriraj, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Center, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
Author contributions: Amornyotin S designed the research; Amornyotin S, Kachintorn U and Kongphlay S performed the research; Amornyotin S wrote the paper.
Correspondence to: Somchai Amornyotin, Associate Professor of Department of Anesthesiology and Siriraj, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Center, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand. sisam@mahidol.ac.th
Telephone: +66-2-4197990 Fax: +66-2-4113256
Received: October 13, 2011
Revised: December 7, 2011
Accepted: April 27, 2012
Published online: May 16, 2012
Abstract

AIM: To study the anesthetic management of patients undergoing small bowel enteroscopy in the World Gastroenterology Organization (WGO) Endoscopy Training Center in Thailand.

METHODS: Patients who underwent small bowel enteroscopy during the period of March 2005 to March 2011 in Siriraj Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Center were retrospectively analyzed. The patients’ characteristics, pre-anesthetic problems, anesthetic techniques, anesthetic agents, anesthetic time, type and route of procedure and anesthesia-related complications were assessed.

RESULTS: One hundred and forty-four patients underwent this procedure during the study period. The mean age of the patients was 57.6 ± 17.2 years, and most were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class II (53.2%). Indications for this procedure were gastrointestinal bleeding (59.7%), chronic diarrhea (14.3%), protein losing enteropathy (2.6%) and others (23.4%). Hematologic disease, hypertension, heart disease and electrolyte imbalance were the most common pre-anesthetic problems. General anesthesia with endotracheal tube was the anesthetic technique mainly employed (50.6%). The main anesthetic agents administered were fentanyl, propofol and midazolam. The mean anesthetic time was 94.0 ± 50.5 min. Single balloon and oral (antegrade) intubation was the most common type and route of enteroscopy. The anesthesia-related complication rate was relatively high. The overall and cardiovascular-related complication rates including hypotension in the older patient group (aged ≥ 60 years old) were significantly higher than those in the younger group.

CONCLUSION: During anesthetic management for small bowel enteroscopy, special techniques and drugs are not routinely required. However, for safety reasons anesthetic personnel need to optimize the patient’s condition.

Keywords: Anesthetic management; Anesthetic technique; Complication; Developing country; Small bowel enteroscopy; Training center