• Anatomic variation
• Bile ducts
• Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography

• anatomy
• bile duct
• bile ducts
• iatrogenic bile duct injury
• magnetic resonance imaging
• variant

• bile ducts
• liver
• magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography

Bile leak is a common complication after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anatomical variations in the biliary tree can go unnoticed by the surgical team and cause complications such as this. This case report presents a patient admitted to the emergency department a week after a laparoscopic cholecystectomy due to abdominal pain and nausea. After a computed tomography, the patient was brought to the operating room for an exploratory laparoscopy, where an injured Luschka duct was found. The biliary tree has many variations that the surgeon should be aware of to minimize the risk of complications of this nature after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. There are imagining techniques with various grades of effectiveness, but in the end, the surgeon’s expertise and experience are the main factors in avoiding these complications.

Background

Although left hemihepatectomy has been widely performed via the laparoscopic approach, the roles of the assistant surgeon have not been well-documented so far. We herein present our standardized procedures of laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy without Spiegel’s lobe resection, focusing on the crucial roles of the assistant surgeon.

Methods

During laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy without Spiegel’s lobe resection, countertraction by the assistant surgeon is quite important especially during isolating the left Glissonean pedicle and transecting liver parenchyma. When securing the left hepatic pedicle using the Glissonean approach, the assistant surgeon pushes Segment 4 of the liver cranially and pulls the tape encircling the hepatoduodenal ligament caudally in the opposite way, orthogonal to the direction of the laparoscopic forceps toward the left portal triad. During liver parenchymal transection, the assistant surgeon pulls the hanging tape across the left lobe of the liver in order to provide a wide and stable liver transection plane.

With this standardized technique, nine cases of laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy were performed over the last two years in our department, and the perioperative data were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

The median age of the nine patients was 70 years (range: 58 - 84 years). Most of the patients were males (77.8%). Five of nine patients were diagnosed with colorectal liver metastasis, two with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), one with inflammatory pseudotumor, and the other one with hepaticolithiasis. There were no conversions to open surgery. The median operative time and estimated blood loss were 337 minutes (range: 219 - 478 minutes) and 100 ml (range: 41 - 375 ml), respectively. The median length of postoperative hospital stay was nine days (range: 7 - 16 days). Major complications (Clavien-Dindo classification grade III or more) were not encountered in our cohort postoperatively.

Conclusion

We presented here our standardized assistant roles during laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy without Spiegel’s lobe resection, which was revealed to be safe and feasible in our cohort.

In the classic descriptions of the human liver, the common hepatic duct forms at the confluence of left and right hepatic ducts. Many authors have documented variations in the intra-hepatic ductal system, but to the best of our knowledge there has been no report on bile duct variations in Caribbean populations.

To evaluate the variations in bile duct anatomy using magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) in unselected patients at a major hepatobiliary referral centre in the Eastern Caribbean. Knowledge of the intra-hepatic biliary anatomy is important to optimize service delivery for any physician treating liver and biliary disorders.

This study was carried out at a tertiary referral hospital for hepatobiliary diseases in the Eastern Caribbean. We retrospectively evaluated magnetic resonance cholangiograms in 152 consecutive patients at this facility over a two-year period from April 1, 2017 to March 31, 2019. Two consultant radiologists experienced in MRC interpretation reviewed all scans and described biliary anatomy according to the Huang’s classification. A systematic review of published studies was performed and relevant data were extracted in order to calculate the global prevalence of each biliary variant. The variants in our population were compared to the global population.

There were 152 MRCs evaluated in this study in 86 males and 66 females. There were 109 (71.7%) persons with “classic” biliary anatomy (type A1) and variants were present in 43 (28.3%) persons. There was no statistical relationship between the presence of anatomic variants and gender or ethnicity. We encountered the following variants: 29 (19.1%) type A2, 7 (4.6%) type A3, 6 (3.95%) type A4, 0 type A5 and a single variant (quadrification) that did not fit the classification system. Compared to the global prevalence, our population had a significantly greater occurrence of A1 anatomy (71.7% vs 62.6%; P = 0.0227) and A2 trifurcations (19.1% vs 11.5%; P = 0.0069), but a significantly lower incidence of A3 variants (4.61% vs 11.5%; P = 0.0047).

There are significant differences in intra-hepatic biliary anatomy in this unselected Eastern Caribbean population compared to global statistics. Specifically, persons of Caribbean descent have a greater incidence of Huang A2 trifurcations and a lower incidence of Huang A3 variants.

• Liver
• Variant
• Biliary
• Duct
• Intra-hepatic
• Aberrant
• Trifurcation, Bifurcation

Introduction

Hepatobiliary tree variant anatomy is crucial to understand the preoperative planning of hepatobiliary surgeries. Although the presence of variant anatomy is not an absolute contraindication for liver transplantation, inadvertent mapping can lead to postoperative biliary complications. These variants are also important to be recognized in various hepatobiliary surgeries and interventional procedures. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is an excellent non-invasive imaging tool that can identify biliary anatomy. The purpose of the current study is focused on determining anatomical variants of the biliary tree on MRCP in our population visiting a teaching hospital in Karachi.

Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted on patients referred to Dr. Ziauddin Hospital for MRCP. MRCP was performed on MAGNETOM Avanto, SIEMENS, Belgium, Germany. Images were analyzed on a workstation by two radiologists and a postgraduate trainee. A senior radiologist reviewed equivocal cases. SPSS 22.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) was used for statistical analysis. Chi-square test was used to see the link between anatomical variants of biliary tree and gender. P-value of ≤0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Results

We recruited 369 patients undergoing MRCP consecutively for our study. Out of 369, 342 patients were eligible for analysis (139 males and 203 females). Standard anatomy was found to be prevalent in 65.8%. Type 3 was the leading variant. A statistically significant difference was recorded for the type 2 anatomic variant which was more frequent in males than females (p-value <0.001), while types 1, 3, and 4 anatomic variants were found to be more in females than males but this difference was not statistically significant. Few other variants were also recorded.

Conclusion

This study is robust evidence regarding biliary variants in Pakistan. It is important to consider these variants in our region, owing to an increased trend of liver transplants and other hepatobiliary procedures.

Intrahepatic and extrahepatic anatomical knowledge is essential for pre procedural planning of liver transplantation, liver resection, complex biliary reconstruction and radiological biliary tree intervention. Indian data of biliary anatomy and its variation is scant in literature. The aim of our study is to find out the prevalence of common and uncommon pattern of biliary tree anatomy in magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in our population. A total of 1,038 cases of MRCP of population of Odisha were obtained from Picture Archiving and Communication System of the department and were reviewed by two senior radiologists for anatomical pattern and variations. The typical and most common pattern of right hepatic duct (RHD) branching was seen in 72.8% cases. The most common variant of RHD was trifurcation pattern of insertion of right anterior sectoral duct (RASD), right posterior sectoral duct and left hepatic duct (LHD) forming common hepatic duct (CHD) in 11.3% of cases. The common trunk of segment (SEG) II and III ducts joining the SEG IV duct was the most common LHD branching pattern in 90.3% of cases. The most common pattern of cystic duct was posterior insertion to middle third of CHD (42.8%). MRCP is the non-invasive imaging modality for demonstration of biliary duct morphology to prevent iatrogenic injury during hepatobiliary intervention and surgery.

• Anatomic variation
• Bile ducts
• Cholangiography
• Intraheaptic
• Magnetic resonance imaging