|
1
|
Hagen R, Srivastava A, Anderson JC. The serrated pathway and colorectal cancer: what the gastroenterologist should know. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2025:1-14. [PMID: 40409278 DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2025.2509797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2025] [Revised: 04/28/2025] [Accepted: 05/19/2025] [Indexed: 05/25/2025]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Serrated polyps can progress to colorectal cancer (CRC), through a pathway that is distinct from the conventional adenoma-carcinoma sequence. This pathway includes hyperplastic polyps (HPs), sessile serrated polyps (SSPs), and traditional serrated adenomas (TSAs). AREAS COVERED Our review includes the histology and pathological challenges, carcinogenesis, risk factors, detection, emerging technologies, resection, and surveillance. EXPERT OPINION Serrated polyp management presents many detection, diagnosis, resection, and surveillance challenges. Missed serrated polyps contribute to preventable CRCs. A new SSP detection rate benchmark will guide endoscopists with a goal when improving detection. Furthermore, new SSP-specific surveillance strategies may also aid in reducing CRC burden. Histologic differentiation remains a challenge, underscoring the need for standardized pathology practices and exploring novel ways to stratify risk independent of histology, given interobserver variation. Moreover, the clinical significance of proximal HPs requires further clarification. Which HPs < 1 cm require closer surveillance intervals? Molecular profiling may help identify markers that separate proximal low risk from high-risk HP. The best approach for resection of serrated polyps also needs to be clarified. There is also a lack of robust longitudinal outcome data to guide surveillance recommendations since current guidelines are based on low quality of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachael Hagen
- Department of Medicine, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA
| | - Amitabh Srivastava
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Joseph C Anderson
- Department of Medicine, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, White River Junction VAMC, White River Junction, VT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Thoufeeq M, Mohanan V, Nishad N, Toh EW, Shiha MG. Variation in Proximal Sessile Serrated Lesion Detection Rates During Non-screening Colonoscopies. Cureus 2025; 17:e82317. [PMID: 40376347 PMCID: PMC12080950 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.82317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/15/2025] [Indexed: 05/18/2025] Open
Abstract
AIMS Proximal sessile serrated lesions (PSSL) are increasingly recognized as significant precursors of interval colon cancer. We aimed to assess the PSSL detection rates during non-screening colonoscopies and whether there are associations between PSSL detection rate and the established colonoscopy key performance indicators (KPI). METHODS We retrospectively collected data of all non-screening colonoscopies performed by independent endoscopists at a large teaching hospital between June and December 2019. Data regarding endoscopists' KPIs, including polyp detection rate (PDR), cecal intubation rate (CIR), and colonoscopy withdrawal time (CWT), were retrieved from the national endoscopy database. SSL resected proximal to the splenic flexure were identified by an expert pathologist. Associations between PSSL detection rate and the different KPIs were assessed using Spearman's test. RESULTS A total of 2956 colonoscopies performed by 33 endoscopists were included. The mean PSSL detection rate was 0.7% (SD 1.5), the mean PDR was 37.1% (SD 17), the mean CIR was 91.3% (SD 6), and the mean CWT was nine minutes (SD 2). There was marked variability in PSSL detection rates between endoscopists (range 0 - 6.5%). PSSL detection rate positively correlated with CWT (r=0.34, p=0.04) but not with the other KPIs. CONCLUSION The wide variability in PSSL detection between endoscopists is concerning of high miss rates and despite achieving the national benchmarks for the established KPIs, many endoscopists still had low PSSL detection rates. Therefore, PSSL detection rate should be considered as an independent KPI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mo Thoufeeq
- Gastroenterology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Sheffield, GBR
| | - Vikram Mohanan
- Gastroenterology, Kettering General Hospital, Kettering, GBR
| | - Nilanga Nishad
- Gastroenterology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Sheffield, GBR
| | - Eu-Wing Toh
- Pathology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Sheffield, GBR
| | - Mohamed G Shiha
- Gastroenterology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Sheffield, GBR
| |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Wu J, Zhang Q, Li X, Bai T, Hou X, Li G, Song J. The Effect of the Second Forward View on the Detection Rate of Sessile Serrated Lesions in the Proximal Colon: A Single-Center Prospective Randomized Controlled Study. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 2025; 16:e00805. [PMID: 39688959 PMCID: PMC11845190 DOI: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2024] [Accepted: 12/06/2024] [Indexed: 12/19/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The detection rate of proximal sessile serrated lesion (PSSLDR) is linked to the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer. However, research on second forward view (SFV) examinations for PSSLDR remains limited. This first randomized controlled trial assessed the impact of the proximal SFV on the PSSLDR. METHODS Patients were randomized into 2 groups during proximal colonoscopy: standard colonoscopy (SC) and SFV. The SC group underwent a standard examination, whereas the SFV group underwent a second examination of the proximal colon (cecum to splenic flexure). The primary outcome was PSSLDR, with secondary outcomes, including the proximal polyp detection rate (PPDR), proximal adenoma detection rate (PADR), and lesion miss rate, compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS Among 246 patients (SC = 124; SFV = 122), SFV significantly improved the PSSLDR by 7.4% compared with SC (9.8% vs 2.4%, P = 0.017). SFV increased the PPDR by 20.2% (55.7% vs 35.5%, P = 0.002) and PADR by 12.7% (37.7% vs 25%, P = 0.039). Multivariate analysis revealed that sessile serrated lesions (odds ratio [OR] = 7.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.58, 37.59]), inflammatory polyps (OR = 4.24, 95% CI [1.73, 10.39]), and lesion size (OR = 0.76, 95% CI [0.60, 0.96]) were associated with proximal missed lesions. The overall polyp miss rate was 52.9%, with miss rates of 61.0% for polyps <5 mm, 80% for sessile serrated lesions, and 42.2% for adenomas. Furthermore, 12.3% of patients experienced changes in surveillance intervals from SFV examination. DISCUSSION SFV examination of the proximal colon significantly improved the PSSLDR by 7.4%, PPDR by 20.2%, and PADR by 12.7%, while shortening the detection interval by 12.3%, making it a valuable and cost-effective addition to routine colonoscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiandi Wu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Qingqing Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Xueyan Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Tao Bai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Xiaohua Hou
- Department of Gastroenterology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Gangping Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Jun Song
- Department of Gastroenterology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
|
4
|
Walton Bernstedt S, Haxhijaj A, Jamizadeh N, Björk J, Andreasson A, Forsberg AM, Backman AS. Quality of endoscopic surveillance of Lynch syndrome patients in a Swedish cohort. Endosc Int Open 2024; 12:E854-E860. [PMID: 38966318 PMCID: PMC11223886 DOI: 10.1055/a-2339-7152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 04/06/2024] [Indexed: 07/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Risk factors for colorectal cancer (CRC) in Lynch syndrome (LS) include sex, age, smoking, high body mass index (BMI), surveillance interval length, and risk genotype. The Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) produces a standardized bowel cleanliness rating. A low BBPS score might be a risk factor for missed early lesions. The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between BBPS score and adenoma detection (with known risk factors for CRC) and surveillance interval with CRC detection in LS patients. Methods A retrospective cohort study including 366 LS patients with 1,887 colonoscopies under surveillance in Stockholm, Sweden from 1989 to 2021 was conducted. Associations were tested using linear and logistic regression. Results We found no association between BBPS score and number of adenomas detected. A low BBPS score was found to be associated with older age (regression coefficient (coeff) -0.015; 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.026 to -0.004; P = 0.007) and obesity (coeff = -0.48; 95% CI: -0.89 to -0.062; P = 0.024). A higher number of detected adenomas was associated with older age (coeff = 0.008; 95% CI 0.004 to 0.012; P < 0.001), male sex (coeff = 0.097; 95% CI 0.008 to 0.19; P = 0.033) and CRC (coeff = 0.28; 95% CI 0.061 to 0.50; P = 0.012). Surveillance interval length was not significant in CRC detection. Conclusions Bowel cleanliness was not associated with adenoma detection and was less likely achieved in patients who were older and had higher BMI. Adenoma detection was associated with older age and male sex. The results indicate the need for better adherence to guidelines and attention to older age groups, men, and patients with obesity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Walton Bernstedt
- Department of Medicine Huddinge, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
- Division of Gastroenterology, Dermatology and Rheumatology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Upper GI Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Adrianna Haxhijaj
- Department of Medicine Huddinge, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Nigin Jamizadeh
- Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jan Björk
- Division of Gastroenterology, Dermatology and Rheumatology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Hereditary Cancer, Medical Unit Breast Endocrine and Sarcoma Tumours, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anna Andreasson
- Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anna M Forsberg
- Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institute Clinical Epidemiology Division, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ann-Sofie Backman
- Department of Medicine Huddinge, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
- Gastroenterology Unit, Division of Medicine, Ersta Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
|
5
|
Sullivan BA, Lieberman DA. Colon Polyp Surveillance: Separating the Wheat From the Chaff. Gastroenterology 2024; 166:743-757. [PMID: 38224860 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.11.305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Revised: 11/20/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/17/2024]
Abstract
One goal of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is to prevent CRC incidence by removing precancerous colonic polyps, which are detected in up to 50% of screening examinations. Yet, the lifetime risk of CRC is 3.9%-4.3%, so it is clear that most of these individuals with polyps would not develop CRC in their lifetime. It is, therefore, a challenge to determine which individuals with polyps will benefit from follow-up, and at what intervals. There is some evidence that individuals with advanced polyps, based on size and histology, benefit from intensive surveillance. However, a large proportion of individuals will have small polyps without advanced histologic features (ie, "nonadvanced"), where the benefits of surveillance are uncertain and controversial. Demand for surveillance will further increase as more polyps are detected due to increased screening uptake, recent United States recommendations to expand screening to younger individuals, and emergence of polyp detection technology. We review the current understanding and clinical implications of the natural history, biology, and outcomes associated with various categories of colon polyps based on size, histology, and number. Our aims are to highlight key knowledge gaps, specifically focusing on certain categories of polyps that may not be associated with future CRC risk, and to provide insights to inform research priorities and potential management strategies. Optimization of CRC prevention programs based on updated knowledge about the future risks associated with various colon polyps is essential to ensure cost-effective screening and surveillance, wise use of resources, and inform efforts to personalize recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian A Sullivan
- Cooperative Studies Program Epidemiology Center-Durham, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina; Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
| | - David A Lieberman
- Portland Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Portland, Oregon; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
| |
Collapse
|
|
6
|
Oguntoye OO, Oguntoye OA, Adeniyi OM, Jegede OS. Histopathological Outcome of Colonoscopic Biopsies in a Tertiary Hospital in Southwestern Nigeria: A 7-Year Retrospective Study. Ann Afr Med 2024; 23:213-221. [PMID: 39028171 PMCID: PMC11210739 DOI: 10.4103/aam.aam_43_23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2023] [Revised: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 06/08/2023] [Indexed: 07/20/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Colonoscopy with histopathological analysis of mucosal biopsy samples remains the gold standard procedure for diagnosing lower gastrointestinal disorders. This study aimed to determine the pattern of histopathological findings of mucosal biopsies obtained at colonoscopy over a 7-year period and to correlate the histological findings with the clinical profile of the patients. METHODS This was a retrospective study conducted in a healthcare facility in southwestern Nigeria. The Histology reports from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2022, were retrieved from the histopathology department of the institution to obtain the following information for analysis: age, gender, year of the test, presenting complaint, provisional clinical diagnosis, colonoscopy diagnosis, and histological diagnosis. RESULTS The data of a total number of 81 patients were analyzed; 51 males (63.0%) and 30 females (37.0%) with a male-to-female ratio of 1.7-1. The age range of the patients was 30-86 years with a mean (±standard deviations) age of 59.87 ± 14.44. The most common indication for colonoscopy was hematochezia (23 (28.4%)) followed by change in bowel habit (16 [19.8%]), constipation (11 [13.6%]), and tenesmus (10 [12.3%]). Large bowel masses suggestive of cancers were the most common colonoscopy finding in the study subjects (36 [44.4%]). Colorectal cancer was the most common histologic abnormality in the study subjects (26 [32.1%]) followed by chronic nonspecific colitis (8 [9.9%]), polyps (7 [8.6%]), adenomas (5 [6.2%]) and acute on chronic colitis (5 [6.2%]). Twenty-two (27.2%) patients had normal histologic findings. Patients aged between 45 and 64 years had the highest prevalence of colorectal cancer (13 [50.0%]). CONCLUSION Colorectal cancer was the most common histopathological finding in this study and the patients were mostly within the middle-age group. Early screening colonoscopy is therefore recommended and histopathological analysis of the mucosal specimens obtained is essential for early detection of premalignant lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oluwatosin Oluwagbenga Oguntoye
- Department of Medicine, Federal Teaching Hospital, Ido-Ekiti, Nigeria
- Department of Medicine, Afe Babalola University, Ado-Ekiti, Ekiti State, Nigeria
| | - Oluwafunmilayo Adenike Oguntoye
- Department of Medicine, Federal Teaching Hospital, Ido-Ekiti, Nigeria
- Department of Medicine, Afe Babalola University, Ado-Ekiti, Ekiti State, Nigeria
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
7
|
Wang JD, Xu GS, Hu XL, Li WQ, Yao N, Han FZ, Zhang Y, Qu J. The histologic features, molecular features, detection and management of serrated polyps: a review. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1356250. [PMID: 38515581 PMCID: PMC10955069 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1356250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/21/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024] Open
Abstract
The serrated pathway to colorectal cancers (CRCs) is a significant pathway encompassing five distinct types of lesions, namely hyperplastic polyps (HPs), sessile serrated lesions (SSLs), sessile serrated lesions with dysplasia (SSL-Ds), traditional serrated adenomas (TSAs), and serrated adenoma unclassified. In contrast to the conventional adenoma-carcinoma pathway, the serrated pathway primarily involves two mechanisms: BRAF/KRAS mutations and CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP). HPs are the most prevalent non-malignant lesions, while SSLs play a crucial role as precursors to CRCs, On the other hand, traditional serrated adenomas (TSAs) are the least frequently encountered subtype, also serving as precursors to CRCs. It is crucial to differentiate these lesions based on their unique morphological characteristics observed in histology and colonoscopy, as the identification and management of these serrated lesions significantly impact colorectal cancer screening programs. The management of these lesions necessitates the crucial steps of removing premalignant lesions and implementing regular surveillance. This article provides a comprehensive summary of the epidemiology, histologic features, molecular features, and detection methods for various serrated polyps, along with recommendations for their management and surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin-Dong Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Peking University Aerospace School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Guo-Shuai Xu
- Department of General Surgery, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xin-Long Hu
- Department of General Surgery, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Wen-Qiang Li
- Department of General Surgery, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Nan Yao
- Department of General Surgery, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Fu-Zhou Han
- Department of General Surgery, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yin Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jun Qu
- Department of General Surgery, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
|
8
|
Zuniga Cisneros J, Tunon C, Adames E, Garcia C, Rivera R, Gonzalez E, Cubilla J, Lambrano L. Is There a Difference in Adenoma Detection Rates According to Indication? An Experience in a Panamanian Colorectal Cancer Screening Program. Gastroenterology Res 2023; 16:96-104. [PMID: 37187549 PMCID: PMC10181342 DOI: 10.14740/gr1599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2023] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The benefit of colorectal cancer screening in reducing cancer risk and related death is unclear. There are quality measure indicators and multiple factors that affect the performance of a successful colonoscopy. The main objective of our study was to identify if there is a difference in polyp detection rate (PDR) and adenoma detection rate (ADR) according to colonoscopy indication and which factors might be associated. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of all colonoscopies performed between January 2018 and January 2019, in a tertiary endoscopic center. All patients ≥ 50 years old scheduled for a nonurgent colonoscopy and screening colonoscopy were included. We stratified the total number of colonoscopies into two categories according to the indication: screening vs. non-screening, and then calculated PDR, ADR and serrated polyp detection rate (SDR). We also performed logistic regression model to identify factors associated with detecting polyps and adenomatous polyps. Results A total of 1,129 and 365 colonoscopies were performed in the non-screening and screening group, respectively. In comparison with the screening group, PDR and ADR were lower for the non-screening group (33% vs. 25%; P = 0.005 and 17% vs. 13%; P = 0.005). SDR was non-significantly lower in the non-screening group when compared with the screening group (11% vs. 9%; P = 0.53 and 22% vs. 13%; P = 0.007). Conclusion In conclusion, this observational study reported differences in PDR and ADR depending on screening and non-screening indication. These differences could be related to factors related to the endoscopist, time slot allotted for colonoscopy, population background, and external factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Carlos Tunon
- Department of Gastroenterology, Santo Tomas Hospital, Panama City, Panama
| | - Enrique Adames
- School of Medicine, University of Panama, Panama City, Panama
- Department of Gastroenterology, Santo Tomas Hospital, Panama City, Panama
| | - Carolina Garcia
- School of Medicine, University of Panama, Panama City, Panama
| | - Rene Rivera
- School of Medicine, University of Panama, Panama City, Panama
| | - Eyleen Gonzalez
- School of Medicine, University of Panama, Panama City, Panama
| | - Jan Cubilla
- Department of Gastroenterology, Santo Tomas Hospital, Panama City, Panama
| | - Luis Lambrano
- Department of Gastroenterology, Santo Tomas Hospital, Panama City, Panama
| |
Collapse
|
|
9
|
Park SB, Cha JM. Quality indicators in colonoscopy: the chasm between ideal and reality. Clin Endosc 2022; 55:332-338. [PMID: 35656625 PMCID: PMC9178135 DOI: 10.5946/ce.2022.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2021] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Continuous measurement of quality indicators (QIs) should be a routine part of colonoscopy, as a wide variation still exists in the performance and quality levels of colonoscopy in Korea. Among the many QIs of colonoscopy, the adenoma detection rate, average withdrawal time, bowel preparation adequacy, and cecal intubation rate should be monitored in daily clinical practice to improve the quality of the procedure. The adenoma detection rate is the best indicator of the quality of colonoscopy; however, it has many limitations for universal use in daily practice. With the development of natural language processing, the adenoma detection rate is expected to become more effective and useful. It is important that colonoscopists do not strictly and mechanically maintain an average withdrawal time of 6 minutes but instead perform careful colonoscopy to maximally expose the colonic mucosa with a withdrawal time of at least 6 minutes. To achieve adequate bowel preparation, documentation of bowel preparation with the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) should be a routine part of colonoscopy. When colonoscopists routinely followed the bowel preparation protocols, ≥85% of outpatient screening colonoscopies had a BBPS score of ≥6. In addition, the cecal intubation rate should be ≥95% of all screening colonoscopies. The first step in improving colonoscopy quality in Korea is to apply these key performance measurements in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Su Bee Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Myung Cha
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Correspondence: Jae Myung Cha Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, 892 Dongnam-ro, Gangdong-gu, Seoul 05278, Korea E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
|
10
|
Chang WY, Chiu HM. Synergistic or independent? Revisiting colonoscopic surveillance for conventional and serrated lesions. Dig Endosc 2022; 34:858-861. [PMID: 35048427 DOI: 10.1111/den.14227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2021] [Revised: 12/21/2021] [Accepted: 12/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Wei-Yuan Chang
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsinchu Branch, Hsinchu, Taiwan
| | - Han-Mo Chiu
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
|
11
|
Staudenmann D, Liu K, Varma P, Wong M, Rai S, Tsoutsman T, Choi KH, Saxena P, Kaffes AJ. Narrow band imaging versus white light for detecting sessile serrated lesion: A prospective randomized multicenter study. DEN OPEN 2022; 2:e44. [PMID: 35310703 PMCID: PMC8828189 DOI: 10.1002/deo2.44] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2021] [Revised: 06/29/2021] [Accepted: 07/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Dominic Staudenmann
- AW Morrow Gastroenterology and Liver Centre Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Sydney Australia
- Department of Gastroenterology Praxis Balsiger Seibold und Partner Bern Switzerland
- Université de Fribourg Fribourg Switzerland
| | - Ken Liu
- AW Morrow Gastroenterology and Liver Centre Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Sydney Australia
- Sydney Medical School University of Sydney Sydney Australia
| | - Poornima Varma
- Department of Gastroenterology Austin Health Heidelberg Australia
| | - May Wong
- AW Morrow Gastroenterology and Liver Centre Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Sydney Australia
- Royal North Shore Hospital St. Leonards Sydney Australia
| | - Sonam Rai
- Sydney Medical School University of Sydney Sydney Australia
| | - Tatiana Tsoutsman
- AW Morrow Gastroenterology and Liver Centre Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Sydney Australia
- Sydney Medical School University of Sydney Sydney Australia
| | - Kyung Ho Choi
- AW Morrow Gastroenterology and Liver Centre Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Sydney Australia
- Sydney Medical School University of Sydney Sydney Australia
| | - Payal Saxena
- AW Morrow Gastroenterology and Liver Centre Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Sydney Australia
- Sydney Medical School University of Sydney Sydney Australia
| | - Arthur John Kaffes
- AW Morrow Gastroenterology and Liver Centre Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Sydney Australia
- Sydney Medical School University of Sydney Sydney Australia
| |
Collapse
|
|
12
|
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-associated mortality, with a lifetime risk of approximately 4% to 5%. Colorectal cancer develops from the sequential acquisition of defined genetic mutations in the colonic epithelium. Tumorigenesis from normal tissue to cancer occurs largely through 3 pathways: the chromosomal instability pathway, the microsatellite instability pathway, and the sessile serrated pathway. Colorectal cancer incidence and mortality have decreased by approximately 35% since the beginning of screening programs in the 1990s, although other factors such as use of aspirin for coronary disease prevention and decreased smoking rates may also be important. In this review, we discuss the etiology, epidemiology, and histology of colorectal polyps and cancer.
Collapse
|
|
13
|
Lall V, Ismail AGM, Ayonrinde OT. Disparate age and sex distribution of sessile serrated lesions and conventional adenomas in an outpatient colonoscopy population-implications for colorectal cancer screening? Int J Colorectal Dis 2022; 37:1569-1579. [PMID: 35660947 PMCID: PMC9262786 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-022-04191-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Colorectal cancer (CRC) is increasingly diagnosed in individuals aged < 50 years, resulting in advocacy of screening from age 45 years. Despite existing knowledge associating CRC with conventional adenomas, the significance of sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) on the burden of CRC is less detailed. We aimed to provide contemporary estimates for SSL prevalence and examine patient and procedure factors associated with SSL detection. METHODS Retrospective observational study examining associations between SSL and conventional adenoma detection, polyp histopathology, patient, and procedure characteristics in an outpatient colonoscopy unit over 12 months. RESULTS From 2097 colonoscopies, SSL detection was 13.8% overall and 12.5% in patients < 50 years. SSLs were mostly proximal in location (64%), and SSL detection was significantly higher in females compared with males (16.2% vs. 11.7%, p = 0.003), particularly in those < 50 years (16.8% vs. 8.6%, p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, SSL detection was associated with female sex (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15-1.91), synchronous conventional adenoma detection (aOR 1.36, 95% CI 1.04-1.78) and BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 (aOR 1.34, 95% CI 1.02-1.77). Conventional adenoma detection was 33.6% and associated with age ≥ 50 years (aOR 3.57, 95% CI 2.84-4.47) and synchronous SSL detection (aOR 1.36, 95% CI 1.03-1.79). CONCLUSIONS We observed age and sex disparities in polyp types and prevalence in this outpatient colonoscopy population. SSLs were most prevalent in females aged < 50 years, suggesting a potential increased susceptibility of young females to SSLs and CRC. Our findings may have implications for the design of CRC screening programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vidit Lall
- Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Australia ,Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Australia
| | - Ali Galalah Mostafa Ismail
- Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia ,Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Australia
| | - Oyekoya Taiwo Ayonrinde
- Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Australia ,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, Australia ,Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
|
14
|
Ladabaum U, Shepard J, Mannalithara A. Adenoma and Serrated Lesion Detection by Colonoscopy Indication: The ADR-ESS (ADR Extended to all Screening/Surveillance) Score. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 19:1873-1882. [PMID: 33895358 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.04.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2021] [Revised: 04/08/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The adenoma detection rate at screening (ADR) predicts interval colorectal cancer. Monitoring other lesion detection rates and colonoscopy indications has been proposed. We developed a comprehensive, automated colonoscopy audit program based on standardized clinical documentation, explored detection rates across indications, and developed the Adenoma Detection Rate - Extended to all Screening / Surveillance (ADR-ESS) score. METHODS In a prospective cohort study, we calculated overall and advanced adenoma and sessile serrated lesion (SSL) detection rates among 15,253 colonoscopies by 35 endoscopists from 4 endoscopy units across all colonoscopy indications. We explored correlations between detection rates, and the precision and stability of ADR-ESS versus ADR. RESULTS The overall "screening, first" ADR was 36.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 34.5%-38.1%). The adenoma detection rate was lower for "screening, not first" (relative rate [RR], 0.80; 95% CI, 0.74-0.87) and "family history" (RR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.74-0.96), and higher for "surveillance" (RR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.15-1.31) and "follow-up, FIT" (RR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.07-1.37). For "screening, first," the detection rates for advanced adenoma, SSL, and advanced SSL were 6.7% (95% CI, 5.7%-7.7%), 7.2% (95% CI, 6.2%-8.2%), and 2.6% (95% CI, 2.0%-3.2%), respectively. Adenoma and SSL detection were correlated (r = 0.44; P = .008). ADR-ESS had substantially narrower confidence intervals and less period-to-period variability than ADR, and was not improved by weighting for indication volume and correction for detection by indication. CONCLUSIONS Comprehensive, automated colonoscopy audit based on standardized clinical documentation is feasible. Adenoma detection is a fair but imperfect proxy for SSL detection. ADR-ESS increases the precision of adenoma detection assessments and emphasizes quality across colonoscopy indications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uri Ladabaum
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
| | - John Shepard
- Critical Care Quality and Strategic Initiatives, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, California
| | - Ajitha Mannalithara
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| |
Collapse
|
|
15
|
The Authors Reply. Dis Colon Rectum 2021; 64:e79. [PMID: 33496468 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000001954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|
|
16
|
Comment on: Quality of Colonoscopy: A Comparison Between Gastroenterologists and Nongastroenterologists and the Editorial. Dis Colon Rectum 2021; 64:e78. [PMID: 33496470 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000001953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|
|
17
|
Desai M, Anderson JC, Kaminski M, Thoguluva Chandrasekar V, Fathallah J, Hassan C, Lieberman D, Sharma P. Sessile serrated lesion detection rates during average risk screening colonoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the published literature. Endosc Int Open 2021; 9:E610-E620. [PMID: 33869735 PMCID: PMC8043815 DOI: 10.1055/a-1352-4095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2020] [Accepted: 12/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Sessile serrated lesion (SSL) detection rate has been variably reported and unlike adenoma detection rate (ADR) is not currently a quality indicator for screening colonoscopy. Composite detection rates of SSL in patients undergoing average risk screening colonoscopy are not available. Methods Electronic database search (Medline, Embase and Cochrane) was conducted for studies reporting detection rates of serrated polyps (SSL, Hyperplastic polyp, traditional serrated adenoma) among average risk subjects undergoing screening colonoscopy. Primary outcomes were pooled SDR (SSL detection rate) and proximal serrated polyp detection rate (PSPDR). Pooled proportion rates were calculated with 95 %CI with assessment of heterogeneity (I 2 ). Publication bias, regression test and 95 %prediction interval were calculated. Results A total of 280,370 screening colonoscopies among average risk subjects that were eligible with 48.9 % males and an average age of 58.7 years (± 3.2). The pooled SDR was available from 16 studies: 2.5 % (1.8 %-3.4 %) with significant heterogeneity (I 2 = 98.66 %) and the 95 % prediction interval ranging from 0.6 % to 9.89 %. When analysis was restricted to large (n > 1000) and prospective studies (n = 4), SDR was 2 % (1.1 %-3.3 %). Pooled PSPDR was 10 % (8.5 %-11.8 %; 12 studies). There was evidence of publication bias ( P < 0.01). Conclusion Definitions of SSL have been varying over years and there exists significant heterogeneity in prevalence reporting of serrated polyps during screening colonoscopy. Prevalence rate of 2 % for SSL and 10 % for proximal serrated polyps could serve as targets while robust high-quality data is awaited to find a future benchmark showing reduction in colorectal cancer arising from serrated pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madhav Desai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kansas City VA Medical Center, Kansas City, Missouri, United States
| | - Joseph C. Anderson
- Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont, United States,The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, United States
| | - Michael Kaminski
- Department of Gastroenterological Oncology, the Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland,Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Oncology, Medical Center for Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland,Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Jihan Fathallah
- Department of Gastroenterology and hepatology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, United States
| | - Cesare Hassan
- Endoscopy Unit, Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - David Lieberman
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States
| | - Prateek Sharma
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kansas City VA Medical Center, Kansas City, Missouri, United States,Department of Gastroenterology and hepatology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, United States
| |
Collapse
|
|
18
|
Huang J, Chan PS, Pang TW, Choi P, Chen X, Lok V, Zheng ZJ, Wong MC. Rate of detection of serrated lesions at colonoscopy in an average-risk population: a meta-analysis of 129,001 individuals. Endosc Int Open 2021; 9:E472-E481. [PMID: 33655052 PMCID: PMC7895666 DOI: 10.1055/a-1333-1776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2020] [Accepted: 11/02/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Serrated lesions are precursors of approximately one-third of colorectal cancers (CRCs). Information on their detection rate was lacking as an important reference for CRC screening. This study was a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the overall detection rate for serrated lesions and their subtypes in average-risk populations undergoing CRC screening with colonoscopy. Patient and methods MEDLINE and Embase were searched to identify population-based studies that reported the detection rate for serrated lesions. Studies on average-risk populations using colonoscopy as a screening tool were included. Metaprop was applied to model within-study variability by binomial distribution, and Freeman-Tukey Double Arcsine Transformation was adopted to stabilise the variances. The detection rate was presented in proportions using random-effects models. Results In total, 17 studies involving 129,001 average-risk individuals were included. The overall detection rates for serrated lesions (19.0 %, 95 % CI = 15.3 %-23.0 %), sessile serrated polyps (2.5 %, 95 % CI = 1.5 %-3.8 %), and traditional serrated adenomas (0.3 %, 95 % CI = 0.1 %-0.8 %) were estimated. Subgroup analysis indicated a higher detection rate for serrated lesions among males (22.0 %) than females (14.0 %), and Caucasians (25.9 %) than Asians (14.6 %). The detection rate for sessile serrated polyps was also higher among Caucasians (2.9 %) than Asians (0.7 %). Conclusions This study determined the overall detection rate for serrated lesions and their different subtypes. The pooled detection rate estimates can be used as a reference for establishing CRC screening programs. Future studies may evaluate the independent factors associated with the presence of serrated lesions during colonoscopy to enhance their rate of detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junjie Huang
- The Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Paul S.F. Chan
- The Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Tiffany W.Y. Pang
- The Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Peter Choi
- The Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Xiao Chen
- The Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Veeleah Lok
- The Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Zhi-Jie Zheng
- Department of Global Health, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Martin C.S. Wong
- The Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China,Department of Global Health, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China,School of Public Health, The Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
|
19
|
Abdelnaby HB, Abuhussein AA, Fouad AM, Alhashash WA, Aldousari AS, Abdelaleem AM, Edelhamre M, Shahin MH, Faisal M. Histopathological and epidemiological findings of colonoscopy screening in a population with an average risk of colorectal cancer in Kuwait. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2021; 27:158-165. [PMID: 33642352 PMCID: PMC8265403 DOI: 10.4103/sjg.sjg_463_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common cancer in women and the third most common in men worldwide, with a significantly rising incidence in the Middle East region over the last few decades. This study investigates the histopathological and epidemiological characteristics of colonoscopic findings in a population with an average risk of CRC in Kuwait. METHODS In this study, 1,005 asymptomatic average-risk Kuwaiti adults aged over 40 years had their first colonoscopy screening during the 2015-2018 period. Data on lifestyle behaviors (cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, and physical activity), body mass index (BMI), and comorbidities were routinely collected from these individuals. All colorectal polyps or masses were assessed for their site, size, and number and then resected and sent for histopathological examination. RESULTS The mean age of the participants was 54 years, and 52.2% were women. In screened individuals, the polyp detection rate, adenoma detection rate, and carcinoma detection rate were 43.8%, 27.7%, and 1.2%, respectively. Tubular, tubulovillous, and villous types of adenoma constituted 17.3%, 2.8%, and 1.3% of all screened participants. Neoplastic lesions, particularly in the proximal colon, were more common among men aged 40-49 years. Age of 70 years and older (OR: 9.6; 95% CI: 4.7-19.9; P < 0.001), male gender (OR: 1.6; 95% CI: 1.1-2.3; P = 0.011), increased BMI (OR: 1.05; 95% CI: 1.02-1.08; P = 0.001), and smoking (OR: 3.5; 95% CI: 2.3-5.4; P < 0.001) were the most significant independent risk factors for colorectal neoplasia. CONCLUSIONS The high adenoma detection rate (ADR) in Kuwaiti population calls for the establishment of a national programe for CRC screening. The higher ADR in those younger than 50 years calls for assessment of the threshold age at which to start screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hassan B. Abdelnaby
- Department of Endemic and Infectious Diseases, Faculty of medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt,Department of Internal Medicine, Division of gastroenterology, Al Sabah Hospital, Ministry of Health, Kuwait,Address for correspondence: Dr. Hassan B. Abdelnaby, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Al Sabah Hospital, Ministry of Health, P. O. Box (5) – 13001, Safat, Kuwait. E-mail:
| | - Ali A. Abuhussein
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of gastroenterology, Al Sabah Hospital, Ministry of Health, Kuwait
| | - Ahmed M. Fouad
- Department of Public Health, Occupational and Enivronmental Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt
| | - Wafaa A. Alhashash
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of gastroenterology, Al Sabah Hospital, Ministry of Health, Kuwait
| | - Abdulrahman S. Aldousari
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of gastroenterology, Al Sabah Hospital, Ministry of Health, Kuwait
| | - Ahmed M. Abdelaleem
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of gastroenterology, Al Sabah Hospital, Ministry of Health, Kuwait,Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Marcus Edelhamre
- Department of Surgery, Helsingborg Hospital, Helsingborg, Sweden
| | - Maha H. Shahin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of gastroenterology, Al Sabah Hospital, Ministry of Health, Kuwait
| | - Mohammed Faisal
- Department of Surgery, Helsingborg Hospital, Helsingborg, Sweden,Department of Surgery, Surgical Oncology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
|
20
|
Leite FAV, Rocha LCM, Silva RRR, Vilela EG, Alberti LR, Madureira CM. PROXIMAL SERRATED POLYP DETECTION RATE: A COMPLEMENTARY QUALITY INDICATOR FOR ADENOMA DETECTION RATE? ARQUIVOS DE GASTROENTEROLOGIA 2021; 57:466-470. [PMID: 33331478 DOI: 10.1590/s0004-2803.202000000-81] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2020] [Accepted: 09/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effectiveness of colonoscopy for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening depends on quality indicators, which adenoma detection rate (ADR) being the most important. Proximal serrated polyp detection rate (pSPDR) has been studied as a potential quality indicator for colonoscopy. OBJECTIVE The aim is to analyze and compare the difference in ADR and pSPDR between patients undergoing screening colonoscopy and an unselected population with other indications for colonoscopy, including surveillance and diagnosis. METHODS This is a historical cohort of patients who underwent colonoscopy in the digestive endoscopy service of a tertiary hospital. Out of 1554 colonoscopies performed, 573 patients were excluded. The remaining 981 patients were divided into two groups: patients undergoing screening colonoscopy (n=428; 43.6%); patients with other indications including surveillance and diagnosis (n=553; 56.4%). RESULTS Adenoma detection rate of the group with other indications (50.6%) was higher than that of the screening group (44.6%; P=0.03). In regarding pSPDR, there was no difference between pSPDR in both groups (screening 13.6%; other indications 13.7%; P=0.931). There was no significant difference in the mean age (P=0.259) or in the proportion of men and women (P=0.211) between both groups. CONCLUSION Proximal serrated polyp detection rate showed an insignificant difference between groups with different indications and could be used as a complementary indicator to adenoma detection rate. This could benefit colonoscopists with low colonoscopy volume or low volume of screening colonoscopies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernando Antônio Vieira Leite
- Hospital Mater Dei, Departamento de Endoscopia Digestiva, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.,Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Faculdade de Medicina, Pós-graduação Ciências Aplicadas a Cirurgia e Oftalmologia, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil
| | | | - Rodrigo Roda Rodrigues Silva
- Hospital Mater Dei, Departamento de Endoscopia Digestiva, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.,UFMG, Hospital das Clínicas, Instituto Alfa de Gastroenterologia, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil
| | - Eduardo Garcia Vilela
- UFMG, Hospital das Clínicas, Instituto Alfa de Gastroenterologia, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.,Hospital Mater Dei, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil
| | - Luiz Ronaldo Alberti
- Hospital Mater Dei, Departamento de Endoscopia Digestiva, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.,Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Faculdade de Medicina, Pós-graduação Ciências Aplicadas a Cirurgia e Oftalmologia, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil
| | | |
Collapse
|
|
21
|
Causada-Calo NS, Gonzalez-Moreno EI, Bishay K, Shorr R, Dube C, Heitman SJ, Hilsden RJ, Rostom A, Walsh C, Anderson JT, Keswani RN, Scaffidi MA, Grover SC, Forbes N. Educational interventions are associated with improvements in colonoscopy quality indicators: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open 2020; 8:E1321-E1331. [PMID: 33015334 PMCID: PMC7508648 DOI: 10.1055/a-1221-4922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2020] [Accepted: 06/25/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims The quality of screening-related colonoscopy depends on several physician- and patient-related factors. Adenoma detection rate (ADR) varies considerably between endoscopists. Educational interventions aim to improve endoscopists' ADRs, but their overall impact is uncertain. We aimed to assess whether there is an association between educational interventions and colonoscopy quality indicators. Methods A comprehensive search was performed through August 2019 for studies reporting any associations between educational interventions and any colonoscopy quality indicators. Our primary outcome of interest was ADR. Two authors assessed eligibility criteria and extracted data independently. Risk of bias was also assessed for included studies. Pooled rate ratios (RR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were reported using DerSimonian and Laird random effects models. Results From 2,253 initial studies, eight were included in the meta-analysis for ADR, representing 86,008 colonoscopies. Educational interventions were associated with improvements in overall ADR (RR 1.29, 95 % CI 1.25 to 1.42, 95 % prediction interval 1.09 to 1.53) and proximal ADR (RR 1.39, 95 % CI 1.29 to 1.48), with borderline increases in withdrawal time, ([WT], mean difference 0.29 minutes, 95 % CI - 0.12 to 0.70 minutes). Educational interventions did not affect cecal intubation rate ([CIR], RR 1.01, 95 % CI 1.00 to 1.01). Heterogeneity was considerable across many of the analyses. Conclusions Educational interventions are associated with significant improvements in ADR, in particular, proximal ADR, and are not associated with improvements in WT or CIR. Educational interventions should be considered an important option in quality improvement programs aiming to optimize the performance of screening-related colonoscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Emmanuel I. Gonzalez-Moreno
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada,Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Kirles Bishay
- Division of Gastroenterology, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Risa Shorr
- Learning Services, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Catherine Dube
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada,Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Steven J. Heitman
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada,Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Robert J. Hilsden
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada,Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Alaa Rostom
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada,Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Catharine Walsh
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Learning Institute, and Research Institute, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada,The Wilson Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada,Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - John T. Anderson
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHSFT, Gloucester, UK
| | - Rajesh N. Keswani
- Division of Gastroenterology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, USA
| | | | - Samir C. Grover
- Division of Gastroenterology, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Canada,Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nauzer Forbes
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada,Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
|
22
|
Ng S, Sreenivasan AK, Pecoriello J, Liang PS. Polyp Detection Rate Correlates Strongly with Adenoma Detection Rate in Trainee Endoscopists. Dig Dis Sci 2020; 65:2229-2233. [PMID: 31927766 PMCID: PMC7881441 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-020-06049-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2019] [Accepted: 01/03/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The adenoma detection rate (ADR) is a widely accepted quality benchmark for screening colonoscopy but can be burdensome to calculate. Previous studies have shown good correlation between polyp detection rate (PDR) and ADR, but this has not been validated in trainees. Additionally, the correlation between PDR and detection rates for sessile serrated polyps (SSPDR) and advanced neoplasia (ANDR) is not well studied. AIMS We investigated the relationship between PDR and ADR, SSPDR, and ANDR in trainees. METHODS We examined 1600 outpatient colonoscopies performed by 24 trainees at a VA hospital from 2014 to 2017. Variables collected included patient demographics, year of fellowship, colonoscopy indication, and endoscopic and histologic findings. We calculated the overall ratios of PDR to ADR, SSPDR, and ANDR to assess the correlation between measured and calculated ADR, SSPDR, and ANDR, which is equivalent to the correlation between PDR and measured ADR, SSPDR, and ANDR. RESULTS The overall PDR, ADR, SSPDR, and ANDR were 72%, 52%, 2%, and 14%. PDR (48%) was highest in the left colon, while ADR (32%) and ANDR (7%) were highest in the right colon (p < 0.001 for all). The overall ADR/PDR, SSPDR/PDR, and ANDR/PDR ratios were 0.73, 0.03, and 0.20. Correlation between PDR and ADR was highly positive overall (r = 0.87, p < 0.0001) and stronger in the right (r = 0.91) and transverse (r = 0.94) colon than the left colon (r = 0.80). Correlation between PDR and overall SSPDR and ANDR were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS PDR can serve as a surrogate measure of ADR to monitor colonoscopy quality in gastroenterology fellowship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandy Ng
- Department of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Aditya K. Sreenivasan
- Department of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Jillian Pecoriello
- Department of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Peter S. Liang
- Department of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA,Department of Medicine, VA New York Harbor Health Care System, 423 E 23rd St, 11N GI, New York, NY 10010, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
23
|
Meester RGS, van Herk MMAGC, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Ladabaum U. Prevalence and Clinical Features of Sessile Serrated Polyps: A Systematic Review. Gastroenterology 2020; 159:105-118.e25. [PMID: 32199884 PMCID: PMC8653879 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.03.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2019] [Revised: 02/24/2020] [Accepted: 03/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Sessile serrated polyps (SSPs) could account for a substantial proportion of colorectal cancers. We aimed to increase clarity on SSP prevalence and clinical features. METHODS We performed a systematic review of MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane databases for original studies published in English since 2000. We included studies of different populations (United States general or similar), interventions (colonoscopy, autopsy), comparisons (world regions, alternative polyp definitions, adenoma), outcomes (prevalence, clinical features), and study designs (cross-sectional). Random-effects regression was used for meta-analysis where possible. RESULTS We identified 74 relevant colonoscopy studies. SSP prevalence varied by world region, from 2.6% in Asia (95% confidence interval [CI], 0-5.9) to 10.5% in Australia (95% CI, 2.8-18.2). Prevalence values did not differ significantly between the United States and Europe (P = .51); the pooled prevalence was 4.6% (95% CI, 3.4-5.8), and SSPs accounted for 9.4% of polyps with malignant potential (95% CI, 6.6-12.3). The mean prevalence was higher when assessed through high-performance examinations (9.1%; 95% CI, 4.0-14.2; P = .04) and with an alternative definition of clinically relevant serrated polyps (12.3%; 95% CI, 9.3-15.4; P < .001). Increases in prevalence with age were not statistically significant, and prevalence did not differ significantly by sex. Compared with adenomas, a higher proportion of SSPs were solitary (69.0%; 95% CI, 45.9-92.1; P = .08), with diameters of 10 mm or more (19.3%; 95% CI, 12.4-26.2; P = .13) and were proximal (71.5%; 95% CI, 63.5-79.5; P = .008). The mean ages for detection of SSP without dysplasia, with any or low-grade dysplasia, and with high-grade dysplasia were 60.8 years, 65.6 years, and 70.2 years, respectively. The range for proportions of SSPs with dysplasia was 3.7%-42.9% across studies, possibly reflecting different study populations. CONCLUSIONS In a systematic review, we found that SSPs are relatively uncommon compared with adenoma. More research is needed on appropriate diagnostic criteria, variations in detection, and long-term risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reinier G S Meester
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California; Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Marinika M A G C van Herk
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Uri Ladabaum
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| |
Collapse
|
|
24
|
Wong MCS, Huang J, Huang JLW, Pang TWY, Choi P, Wang J, Chiang JI, Jiang JY. Global Prevalence of Colorectal Neoplasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 18:553-561.e10. [PMID: 31323383 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.07.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2019] [Revised: 07/03/2019] [Accepted: 07/12/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Most colorectal cancers (CRC) arise from colorectal adenomas, yet there is not enough information on global prevalence to inform health care policy. We examined the prevalence of any type of adenomas, advanced adenomas (AADs), and CRC according to age, sex, ethnicity, geographic regions, and anatomic location (proximal vs distal). METHODS MEDLINE and Embase were searched from their inception through May 1, 2018, to identify population-based, observational studies that reported the prevalence of colorectal neoplasia. Studies on participants 15 years or older, with a sample size of 500 persons or more, were included. Metaprop (College Station, TX) was used to model within-study variability by binomial distribution and Freeman-Tukey Double Arcsine Transformation to stabilize the variances. The prevalence figures were presented by proportions and their 95% CIs using random-effects models. RESULTS Our meta-analysis included 70 studies involving 637,414 individuals. The overall prevalence rates of adenoma (23.9%; 95% CI, 22.2%-25.8%), AAD (4.6%; 95% CI, 3.8%-5.5%), and CRC (0.4%, 95% CI, 0.3%-0.5%) were calculated. Subgroup analysis indicated that prevalence values (adenomas, AADs, and CRCs) were higher among men (29.7%, 6.5%, and 0.8%, respectively) than women (19.3%, 3.8% and 0.4%, respectively), among older adults (25.9%, 5.2%, and 0.6%, respectively) than younger adults (14.6%, 1.6%, and 0.1%, respectively), among Caucasians (23.7%, 6.6%, and 0.5%, respectively) than other ethnicities, in European countries (25.9%, 8.4%, and 0.8%, respectively) than other countries, and among patients with proximal (25.9%, 5.3%, and 0.1%, respectively) vs distal neoplasia. CONCLUSIONS In a systematic review and meta-analysis, we found a high prevalence of colorectal neoplasia among some populations. This indicates a need to expand CRC screening programs for these groups. The pooled prevalence estimates can be used as quality indicators for established CRC screening programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin C S Wong
- Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Chinese University University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China; Institute of Digestive Disease, Chinese University University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China; State Key Laboratory of Digestive Disease, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China
| | - Junjie Huang
- Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Chinese University University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China
| | - Jason L W Huang
- Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Chinese University University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China
| | - Tiffany W Y Pang
- Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Chinese University University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China
| | - Peter Choi
- Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Chinese University University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China
| | - Jingxuan Wang
- Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Chinese University University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China
| | - Jason I Chiang
- Department of General Practice, University of Melbourne, Australia
| | - Johnny Yu Jiang
- School of Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences/Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
|
25
|
Sarvepalli S, Garber A, Rothberg MB, Mankaney G, McMichael J, Morris-Stiff G, Vargo JJ, Rizk MK, Burke CA. Association of Adenoma and Proximal Sessile Serrated Polyp Detection Rates With Endoscopist Characteristics. JAMA Surg 2020; 154:627-635. [PMID: 30994911 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.0564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Importance Research demonstrates adenoma detection rate (ADR) and proximal sessile serrated polyp detection rate (pSSPDR) are associated with endoscopist characteristics including sex, specialty, and years in practice. However, many studies have not adjusted for other risk factors associated with colonic neoplasia. Objective To assess the association between endoscopist characteristics and polyp detection after adjusting the factors included in previous studies as well as other factors. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study was conducted in the Cleveland Clinic health system with data from individuals undergoing screening colonoscopies between January 2015 and June 2017. The study analyzed data using methods from previous studies that have demonstrated significant associations between endoscopist characteristics and ADR or pSSPDR. Multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression was performed to examine 7 endoscopist characteristics associated with ADRs and pSSPDRs after controlling for patient demographic, clinical, and colonoscopy-associated factors. Exposures Seven characteristics of endoscopists performing colonoscopy. Main Outcomes and Measures The ADR and pSSPDR, with a hypothesis created after data collection began. Results A total of 16 089 colonoscopies were performed in 16 089 patients by 56 clinicians. Of these, 8339 patients were male (51.8%), and the median (range) age of the cohort was 59 (52-66) years. Analyzing the data by the methods used in 4 previous studies yielded an association between endoscopist and polyp detection; surgeons (OR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.28-0.83]) and nongastroenterologists (OR, 0.50 [95% CI 0.29-0.85]) had reduced odds of pSSPDR, which was similar to results in previous studies. In a multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression analysis, ADR was not significantly associated with any endoscopist characteristic, and pSSPDR was only associated with years in practice (odds ratio, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.83-0.89] per increment of 10 years; P < .001) and number of annual colonoscopies performed (odds ratio, 1.05 [95% CI, 1.01-1.09] per 50 colonoscopies/year; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance The differences in ADRs that were associated with 7 of 7 endoscopist characteristics and differences in pSSPDRs that were associated with 5 of 7 endoscopist characteristics in previous studies may have been associated with residual confounding, because they were not replicated in this analysis. Therefore, these characteristics should not influence the choice of endoscopist for colorectal cancer screening. However, clinicians further from their training and those with lower colonoscopy volumes have lower adjusted pSSPDRs and may need additional training to help increase pSSPDRs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ari Garber
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Michael B Rothberg
- Department of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.,Department of Value Based Care, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Gautam Mankaney
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - John McMichael
- Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | - John J Vargo
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Maged K Rizk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Carol A Burke
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
|
26
|
Crockett SD, Nagtegaal ID. Terminology, Molecular Features, Epidemiology, and Management of Serrated Colorectal Neoplasia. Gastroenterology 2019; 157:949-966.e4. [PMID: 31323292 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.06.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 230] [Impact Index Per Article: 38.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2018] [Revised: 06/07/2019] [Accepted: 06/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
In addition to the adenoma to carcinoma sequence, colorectal carcinogenesis can occur via the serrated pathway. Studies have focused on clarification of categories and molecular features of serrated polyps, as well as endoscopic detection and risk assessment. Guidelines from the World Health Organization propose assigning serrated polyps to categories of hyperplastic polyps, traditional serrated adenomas, and sessile serrated lesions (SSLs). Traditional serrated adenomas and SSLs are precursors to colorectal cancer. The serrated pathway is characterized by mutations in RAS and RAF, disruptions to the Wnt signaling pathway, and widespread methylation of CpG islands. Epidemiology studies of serrated polyps have been hampered by inconsistencies in terminology and reporting, but the prevalence of serrated class polyps is 20%-40% in average-risk individuals; most serrated polyps detected are hyperplastic. SSLs, the most common premalignant serrated subtype, and are found in up to 15% of average-risk patients by high-detecting endoscopists. Variations in rate of endoscopic detection of serrated polyps indicate the need for careful examination, with adequate bowel preparation and sufficient withdrawal times. Risk factors for SSLs include white race, family history of colorectal cancer, smoking, and alcohol intake. Patients with serrated polyps, particularly SSLs and traditional serrated adenomas, have an increased risk of synchronous and metachronous advanced neoplasia. Surveillance guidelines vary among countries, but SSLs and proximal hyperplastic polyps require special attention in assignment of surveillance interval-especially in light of concerns regarding incomplete detection and resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seth D Crockett
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
| | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
|
27
|
Lu P, Fields AC, Melnitchouk N. Proximal Sessile Polyps: Raised Expectations for the Detection of Flat Lesions. Dig Dis Sci 2019; 64:2369-2370. [PMID: 31273594 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-019-05710-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Pamela Lu
- Division of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.,Department of Surgery, Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Adam C Fields
- Division of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Nelya Melnitchouk
- Division of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. .,Department of Surgery, Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
|
28
|
Significant Variation in the Detection Rates of Proximal Serrated Polyps Among Academic Gastroenterologists, Community Gastroenterologists, and Colorectal Surgeons in a Single Tertiary Care Center. Dig Dis Sci 2019; 64:2614-2621. [PMID: 31152331 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-019-05664-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2018] [Accepted: 05/06/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Recent studies have demonstrated that the protective effect of colonoscopy against colorectal cancer is lower in the proximal colon. Proximal serrated polyps, including sessile serrated adenomas and proximal hyperplastic polyps, can be frequently missed and pose a risk of interval cancers. AIM To investigate the overall adenoma detection rate (ADR) and the proximal serrated polyp detection rate (PSPDR) among academic gastroenterologists, community gastroenterologists, and colorectal surgeons from a single institution, all of whom have received formal training in colonoscopy during their fellowship. METHODS All complete screening colonoscopies for patients aged 50 or older with a good to excellent bowel preparation performed by different endoscopists at Medstar Washington Hospital Center (Washington, DC) from July 2015 to December 2017 were reviewed. Pathology reports of the resected polyps were manually reviewed. RESULTS A total of 2850 screening colonoscopies meeting the inclusion criteria were performed by 18 endoscopists (6 academic, 7 community, and 5 colorectal surgeons). There was no significant difference in the mean ADR among the three groups of endoscopists: academic gastroenterologists, community gastroenterologists, and colorectal surgeons (40.3% vs 36.0% vs 39.6%, respectively). However, academic gastroenterologists had a significantly higher PSPDR compared to community gastroenterologists or colorectal surgeons (12.3% vs 5.4% vs 4.5%, respectively, ANOVA p = 0.006). CONCLUSION Our novel data show that academic gastroenterologists had a significantly higher PSPDR compared to community gastroenterologists or colorectal surgeons despite a comparable overall ADR among the three groups. PSPDR may be considered as an important quality indicator for colonoscopy, apart from ADR.
Collapse
|
|
29
|
G-EYE colonoscopy is superior to standard colonoscopy for increasing adenoma detection rate: an international randomized controlled trial (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 89:545-553. [PMID: 30273591 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.09.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2018] [Accepted: 09/20/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Colorectal cancer (CRC) is largely preventable with routine screening and surveillance colonoscopy; however, interval cancers arising from precancerous lesions missed by standard colonoscopy still occur. An increased adenoma detection rate (ADR) has been found to be inversely associated with interval cancers. The G-EYE device includes a reusable balloon integrated at the distal tip of a standard colonoscope, which flattens haustral folds, centralizes the colonoscope's optics, and reduces bowel slippage. The insufflated balloon also aims to enhance visualization of the colon during withdrawal, thereby increasing the ADR. METHODS In this randomized, controlled, international, multicenter study (11 centers), patients (aged ≥50 years) referred to colonoscopy for screening, surveillance, or changes in bowel habits were randomized to undergo either balloon-assisted colonoscopy by using an insufflated balloon during withdrawal or standard high-definition colonoscopy. The primary endpoint was the ADR. RESULTS One thousand patients were enrolled between May 2014 and September 2016 to undergo colonoscopy by experienced endoscopists; 803 were finally analyzed (standard colonoscopy n = 396; balloon-assisted colonoscopy n = 407). Baseline parameters were similar in both groups. Balloon-assisted colonoscopy provided a 48.0% ADR compared with 37.5% in the standard colonoscopy group (28% increase; P = .0027). Additionally, balloon-assisted colonoscopy provided for a significant increase in detection of advanced (P = .0033) flat adenomas (P < .0001) and sessile serrated adenomas/polyps (P = .0026). CONCLUSION Balloon-assisted colonoscopy yielded a higher ADR and increased the detection of advanced, flat, and sessile serrated adenomas/polyps when compared with standard colonoscopy. Improved detection by the G-EYE device could impact the quality of CRC screening by reducing miss rates and consequently reducing interval cancer incidence. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT01917513.).
Collapse
|
|
30
|
Almadi MA, Allehibi A, Aljebreen MA, Alharbi OR, Azzam N, Aljebreen AM. Findings during screening colonoscopies in a Middle Eastern cohort. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2019; 25:20-26. [PMID: 30479321 PMCID: PMC6373218 DOI: 10.4103/sjg.sjg_353_18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS Colorectal cancer is the most common cancer in males and the third most common cancer in females. We aim to determine the polyp and adenoma prevalence in a cohort of patients who underwent opportunistic screening colonoscopies. PATIENTS AND METHODS A retrospective cohort study was conducted using an endoscopic reporting database of individuals seen at three tertiary care hospitals (two public hospitals and one private) in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Consecutive patients who were 45 years of age and older and underwent opportunistic screening colonoscopies between November 2016 and October 2017 were included. We excluded those with a history of colon cancer or colonic resection for any reason, inflammatory bowel disease, gastrointestinal bleeding, or anemia. RESULTS Around 1180 patients were included in the study with a mean age of 58.6 years (SD = 7.3), with males representing 53.6% and an overall cecal intubation rate of 92.4%. Masses were found in 1.6% of the study population (50% in the sigmoid or rectosigmoid, 37.5% in the rectum). The polyp detection rate in colonoscopies was 24.8% and the adenoma detection rate was 16.8%. The histology of removed polyps was tubular adenomas in 56.6%, hyperplastic polyps in 32.7%, tubulovillous adenomas in 8.2%, and villous adenomas in 2.5%. The majority of the polyps were in the sigmoid colon (28.3%) and rectum (22.0%), followed by the ascending colon (11.2%) and cecum (10.3%), then the transverse colon and descending colon (9.4% each), and multiple locations in the remainder. CONCLUSION The prevalence of polyps and adenomas in this cohort is less than that reported in the Western populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Majid A. Almadi
- Division of Gastroenterology, King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia,Division of Gastroenterology, The McGill University Health Center, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Canada,Address for correspondence: Dr. Majid A. Almadi, Division of Gastroenterology, King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2925 (59), Riyadh - 11461, Saudi Arabia. E-mail:
| | - Abed Allehibi
- Department of Gastroenterology, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohammad A. Aljebreen
- Department of Medicine, King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Othman R. Alharbi
- Division of Gastroenterology, King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Nahla Azzam
- Division of Gastroenterology, King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdulrahman M. Aljebreen
- Division of Gastroenterology, King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
|
31
|
Sapci I, Aiello A, Gorgun E, Rizk M, Delaney CP, Steele SR, Valente MA. Screening colonoscopy: High quality regardless of endoscopist specialty. Am J Surg 2018; 217:442-444. [PMID: 30268418 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2018] [Revised: 09/07/2018] [Accepted: 09/13/2018] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data suggests that screening colonoscopy performed by non-gastroenterologists are lower quality with lower adenoma detection rates (ADR). The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the endoscopist's specialty on quality parameters in screening colonoscopy. METHODS Screening colonoscopies performed between January 2016 and June 2017 were queried from a prospectively maintained institutional database. Quality parameters including overall ADR, gender-specific ADR, total examination time, cecal intubation rate and withdrawal time were compared between gastroenterology (GI) and colorectal surgery (CRS). RESULTS A total of 15,276 patients were included in the study (mean age 60.3 ± 8; 52.4% female). 11,339 (74.2%) of the colonoscopies were performed by GI, and 3937 (25.7%) were by CRS. Withdrawal time and total scope time were shorter in the GI group. Cecal intubation rate was comparable. Overall ADR, female ADR and male ADR were significantly higher in the GI group, although both groups met national quality benchmarks. CONCLUSION Both specialties achieve appropriate quality metrics for screening colonoscopy. Prospectively evaluating each endoscopist's outcomes, regardless of specialty, is an important tool for ongoing quality improvement towards better patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ipek Sapci
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Alexandra Aiello
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Emre Gorgun
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Maged Rizk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Conor P Delaney
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Scott R Steele
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Michael A Valente
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
|
32
|
Histopathologic study from a colorectal cancer screening in Chile: results from the first 2 years of an international collaboration between Chile and Japan. Eur J Cancer Prev 2018; 28:245-253. [PMID: 29958195 DOI: 10.1097/cej.0000000000000454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
A national colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program began in Chile in 2012, which is an international collaboration between Japan and Chile and is based on a standardized protocol supported by Tokyo Medical and Dental University. We describe the results from the first 2 years of screening at one public hospital in Punta Arenas, Chile. Of 4124 asymptomatic individuals aged between 50 and 75 years, 485 participants with immunological fecal occult blood test values of at least 100 ng/ml and/or those with family histories of CRC underwent colonoscopies. Lesions were found in 291 participants, and 642 histologic samples were obtained. Chilean pathologists made the initial histologic diagnoses, and a Japanese pathologist reviewed the histologic slides and analyzed the results. Of the 291 participants with lesions, 60 (20.6%) were diagnosed with adenocarcinomas, of which 50 (83.3%) were early-phase adenocarcinomas (pTis or pT1), and 163 (56.0%) were diagnosed with conventional adenomas, of which 96 (58.9%) were high-risk adenomas. The cancer prevalence within the screened population was 1.5% (60 of 4124). The colonoscopy cancer detection rate was 12.4% (60 of 485). Notably, we detected one flat-depressed (0-IIc) lesion that measured 5 mm and had invaded the submucosa. The findings from this screening program are the first to show the histopathologic distributions of consecutive lesions and the high incidence of CRC in Chile. The high detection rates for high-risk adenomas and cancer support the feasibility of early CRC screening and its potential to reduce the mortality associated with CRC.
Collapse
|
|
33
|
Ma MX, Bourke MJ. Sessile Serrated Adenomas: How to Detect, Characterize and Resect. Gut Liver 2018; 11:747-760. [PMID: 28494577 PMCID: PMC5669590 DOI: 10.5009/gnl16523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2016] [Accepted: 12/06/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Serrated polyps are important contributors to the burden of colorectal cancers (CRC). These lesions were once considered to have no malignant potential, but currently up to 30% of all CRC are recognized to arise from the serrated neoplasia pathway. The primary premalignant lesions are sessile serrated adenomas/polyps (SSA/Ps), although traditional serrated adenomas are relatively uncommon. Compared to conventional adenomas, SSA/Ps are morphologically subtle with indistinct borders, may be difficult to detect endoscopically, are more prevalent than previously thought, are associated with synchronous and metachronous advanced neoplasia, and have a higher risk of incomplete resection. Although many lesions remain “dormant,” progressive disease is associated with the development of dysplasia and more rapid progression to CRC. As a result, SSA/Ps are strongly implicated in the development of interval cancers. These factors represent unique challenges that require a meticulous approach to their management. In this review, we summarize the contemporary literature on the characterization, detection and resection of SSA/Ps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael X Ma
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Michael J Bourke
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia.,University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
|
34
|
Liem B, Gupta N. Adenoma detection rate: the perfect colonoscopy quality measure or is there more? Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 3:19. [PMID: 29682626 DOI: 10.21037/tgh.2018.03.04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2018] [Accepted: 02/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Brian Liem
- Division of Gastroenterology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, USA
| | - Neil Gupta
- Division of Gastroenterology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
35
|
Eberth JM, Thibault A, Caldwell R, Josey MJ, Qiang B, Peña E, LaFrance D, Berger FG. A statewide program providing colorectal cancer screening to the uninsured of South Carolina. Cancer 2018; 124:1912-1920. [PMID: 29415338 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2017] [Revised: 12/01/2017] [Accepted: 12/27/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer screening rates are lowest in those without insurance or a regular provider. Since 2008, the Colorectal Cancer Prevention Network (CCPN) has provided open access colonoscopy to uninsured residents of South Carolina through established, statewide partnerships and patient navigation. Herein, we describe the structure, implementation, and clinical outcomes of this program. METHODS The CCPN provides access to colonoscopy screening at no cost to uninsured, asymptomatic patients aged 50-64 years (African Americans age 45-64 years are eligible) who live at or below 150% of the poverty line and seek medical care in free medical clinics, federally qualified health centers, or hospital-based indigent practices in South Carolina. Screening is performed by board-certified gastroenterologists. Descriptive statistics and regression analysis are used to describe the population screened, and to assess compliance rates and colonoscopy quality metrics. RESULTS Out of >4000 patients referred to the program, 1854 were deemed eligible, 1144 attended an in-person navigation visit, and 1030 completed a colonoscopy; 909 were included in the final sample. Nearly 90% of participants exhibited good-to-excellent bowel preparation. An overall cecal intubation rate of 99% was measured. The polyp detection rate and adenoma detection rate were 63% and 36%, respectively, with male sex and urban residence positively associated with adenoma detection. Over 13% of participants had an advanced polyp, and 1% had a cancer diagnosis or surgical intervention. CONCLUSION The CCPN program is characterized by strong collaboration with clinicians statewide, low no-show rates, and high colonoscopy quality. Future work will assess the effectiveness of the navigation approach and will explore the mechanisms driving higher adenoma detection in urban participants. Cancer 2018;124:1912-20. © 2018 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan M Eberth
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.,Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.,South Carolina Rural Health Research Center, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.,Center for Colon Cancer Research, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina
| | - Annie Thibault
- Center for Colon Cancer Research, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina
| | - Renay Caldwell
- Center for Colon Cancer Research, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina
| | - Michele J Josey
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina
| | - Beidi Qiang
- Department of Statistics, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.,Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville, Illinois
| | - Edsel Peña
- Department of Statistics, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina
| | | | - Franklin G Berger
- Center for Colon Cancer Research, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.,Department of Biological Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
|
36
|
Parikh MP, Muthukuru S, Jobanputra Y, Naha K, Gupta NM, Wadhwa V, Lopez R, Thota PN, Sanaka MR. Proximal Sessile Serrated Adenomas Are More Prevalent in Caucasians, and Gastroenterologists Are Better Than Nongastroenterologists at Their Detection. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2017; 2017:6710931. [PMID: 29403530 PMCID: PMC5748307 DOI: 10.1155/2017/6710931] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2017] [Revised: 11/04/2017] [Accepted: 11/23/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Proximal sessile serrated adenomas (PSSA) leading to colorectal cancer (CRC) represent an alternate pathway for CRC development. In this study, we aim to determine the prevalence of PSSAs and the impact of patient, colonoscopy, and endoscopist-related factors on PSSA detection. METHODS Patients ≥ 50 years of age undergoing a screening colonoscopy between 2012 and 2014 were included. Detection rates based on patient gender, race, colonoscopy timing, fellow participation, bowel preparation quality, and specialty of the endoscopist were calculated. t-tests were used to compare detection rates and a multivariate-adjusted analysis was performed. RESULTS 140 PSSAs were detected from 4151 colonoscopies, with a prevalence of 3.4%. Detection rate was higher in Caucasians compared to African-Americans (AA) (3.7 ± 4.1 versus 0.96 ± 3.5; p < 0.001). Gastroenterologists detected more PSSAs compared to nongastroenterologists (3.9 ± 3.5 versus 2.2 ± 3.0; p = 0.028). These findings were still significant after adjusted multivariate analysis. The rest of the factors did not make significant difference in PSSA detection rate. CONCLUSIONS PSSAs are more prevalent in Caucasians compared to AAs. Racial difference in prevalence of PSSAs is intriguing and warrants further investigation. Gastroenterologists have a significantly higher PSSADR compared to nongastroenterologists. Educational measures should be implemented in nongastroenterologists to improve their PSSA detection rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malav P. Parikh
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Sujit Muthukuru
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Yash Jobanputra
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Kushal Naha
- Department of Internal Medicine, Presence Saint Francis Hospital, 355 Ridge Ave, Evanston, IL 60202, USA
| | - Niyati M. Gupta
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Vaibhav Wadhwa
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Rocio Lopez
- Department of Biostatistics and Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Prashanthi N. Thota
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Madhusudhan R. Sanaka
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
37
|
Bettington M, Walker N, Rahman T, Vandeleur A, Whitehall V, Leggett B, Croese J. High prevalence of sessile serrated adenomas in contemporary outpatient colonoscopy practice. Intern Med J 2017; 47:318-323. [PMID: 27860102 DOI: 10.1111/imj.13329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2016] [Revised: 11/02/2016] [Accepted: 11/05/2016] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sessile serrated adenomas (SSA) are the polyp precursor of 15-20% of colorectal carcinomas. There is debate about their prevalence and increasing discussion about the need for a serrated polyp detection rate as a quality indicator for colonoscopy. AIMS To assess the prevalence of SSA at an outpatient gastroenterology service. METHODS This is a retrospective study of an unselected consecutive series of patients who had an outpatient colonoscopy between April 2013 and May 2014. The colonoscopy reports were reviewed to identify age, gender, indication for procedure, completion, withdrawal time, adequacy of bowel preparation, number, size and location of polyps. The pathology of all polyps was centrally reviewed by a gastrointestinal pathologist. RESULTS A total of 707 patients underwent colonoscopy within the study period. The mean age of the cohort was 58 years, and 50.6% were female. Polyp(s) were identified in 66.5% of patients. The SSA detection rate was 20.1%, and the adenoma detection rate was 48.0%. SSA detection was associated with longer withdrawal times. Conventional adenoma detection was associated with older age, male gender, longer withdrawal time and a positive faecal occult blood test result. CONCLUSION SSA are highly prevalent in an unselected series of patients attending a gastroenterology outpatient department. Identifying and removing these polyps may help prevent interval colorectal carcinoma. This result may serve as a benchmark for a high-quality colonoscopy service.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Bettington
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, Envoi Specialist Pathologists, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,The Conjoint Gastroenterology Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Neal Walker
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, Envoi Specialist Pathologists, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Tony Rahman
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,The Centre for Biodiscovery and Molecular Development of Therapeutics, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia
| | - Ann Vandeleur
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Vicki Whitehall
- The Conjoint Gastroenterology Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Department of Chemical Pathology, Pathology Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Barbara Leggett
- The Conjoint Gastroenterology Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - John Croese
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,The Centre for Biodiscovery and Molecular Development of Therapeutics, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
|
38
|
Robertson AR, Kennedy NA, Robertson JA, Church NI, Noble CL. Colonoscopy quality with Entonox ®vs intravenous conscious sedation: 18608 colonoscopy retrospective study. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 9:471-479. [PMID: 28979712 PMCID: PMC5605347 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v9.i9.471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2017] [Revised: 07/10/2017] [Accepted: 08/15/2017] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM To compare colonoscopy quality with nitrous oxide gas (Entonox®) against intravenous conscious sedation using midazolam plus opioid. METHODS A retrospective analysis was performed on a prospectively held database of 18608 colonoscopies carried out in Lothian health board hospitals between July 2013 and January 2016. The quality of colonoscopies performed with Entonox was compared to intravenous conscious sedation (abbreviated in this article as IVM). Furthermore, the quality of colonoscopies performed with an unmedicated group was compared to IVM. The study used the following key markers of colonoscopy quality: (1) patient comfort scores; (2) caecal intubation rates (CIRs); and (3) polyp detection rates (PDRs). We used binary logistic regression to model the data. RESULTS There was no difference in the rate of moderate-to-extreme discomfort between the Entonox and IVM groups (17.9% vs 18.8%; OR = 1.06, 95%CI: 0.95-1.18, P = 0.27). Patients in the unmedicated group were less likely to experience moderate-to-extreme discomfort than those in the IVM group (11.4% vs 18.8%; OR = 0.71, 95%CI: 0.60-0.83, P < 0.001). There was no difference in caecal intubation between the Entonox and IVM groups (94.4% vs 93.7%; OR = 1.08, 95%CI: 0.92-1.28, P = 0.34). There was no difference in caecal intubation between the unmedicated and IVM groups (94.2% vs 93.7%; OR = 0.98, 95%CI: 0.79-1.22, P = 0.87). Polyp detection in the Entonox group was not different from IVM group (35.0% vs 33.1%; OR = 1.01, 95%CI: 0.93-1.10, P = 0.79). Polyp detection in the unmedicated group was not significantly different from the IVM group (37.4% vs 33.1%; OR = 0.97, 95%CI: 0.87-1.08, P = 0.60). CONCLUSION The use of Entonox was not associated with lower colonoscopy quality when compared to intravenous conscious sedation using midazolam plus opioid.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander R Robertson
- Department of Gastroenterology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, United Kingdom
| | - Nicholas A Kennedy
- Centre for Genomic and Experimental Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, United Kingdom
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QJ, United Kingdom
| | - James A Robertson
- School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NJ7 2UH, United Kingdom
| | | | - Colin L Noble
- Department of Gastroenterology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
|
39
|
Haumaier F, Sterlacci W, Vieth M. Histological and molecular classification of gastrointestinal polyps. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2017; 31:369-379. [PMID: 28842046 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2017.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2017] [Revised: 06/06/2017] [Accepted: 06/25/2017] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Endoscopic diagnosis and treatment for gastrointestinal polyps became widely available within the last decades. Exact terminology is important for further therapeutic steps, follow up or treatment. Gastroenterologists, Oncologists, Surgeons and Pathologists need to be aware of the most recent terminology to ensure proper risk assessment and subsequent treatment if necessary. This manuscript aims to list the variety of gastrointestinal polyps and the molecular background where appropriate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Michael Vieth
- Institute of Pathology, Klinikum Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
|
40
|
Elwir S, Shaukat A, Shaw M, Hughes J, Colton J. Variability in, and factors associated with, sizing of polyps by endoscopists at a large community practice. Endosc Int Open 2017; 5:E742-E745. [PMID: 28791323 PMCID: PMC5546891 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-112246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2016] [Accepted: 05/02/2017] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Accurate sizing of polyps at time of colonoscopy is critical for determining surveillance intervals. Endoscopists routinely over- or underestimate the size of polyps at colonoscopy. We evaluated the variability in sizing of polyps among multiple endoscopists, and the effect of patient and physician related factors on polyp size estimation in a large community-based practice. METHODS Adult patients who underwent a colonoscopy with polypectomy at five endoscopy centers in Minneapolis/St. Paul by one of 52 endoscopists in 2013 were included in this study. Association of patient, physician, and procedure related factors on polyp sizing was assessed. RESULTS In the study time frame, 38 624 colonoscopies were performed at five ambulatory endoscopy centers. Of these, 16 336 had one or more polyp removed with size information available, and were included in this analysis. There was significant inter-physician variation for estimating polyp sizes larger than 5 mm (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] 0.13). Older patient age (OR 1.08, 95 %CI 1.06 - 1.11), and male physician gender (OR 1.92, 95 %CI 1.26 - 2.94) were associated with increased odds of physicians sizing polyps as larger in size. Surveillance procedures had a higher odds of larger polyp sizing compared to screening (OR 0.91, 95 %CI 0.86 - 0.97) and diagnostic procedures (OR 0.86, 95 %CI 0.78 - 0.94). CONCLUSION In a large community setting, variation of polyp sizing estimates exists between physicians. Male physicians were more likely to size polyps as larger in size. Older patients and patients undergoing surveillance procedures were more likely to have polyps that were sized as larger in size.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saleh Elwir
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA,Corresponding author Saleh Elwir, MD Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and NutritionUniversity of Minnesota406 Harvard St. SEMMC 36MinneapolisMN 55455USA+1-612-625-5620
| | - Aasma Shaukat
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA,Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Minneapolis VA Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Michael Shaw
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - John Hughes
- Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Joshua Colton
- Minnesota Gastroenterology, PA, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
41
|
Racho RG, Krishna M, Coe SG, Thomas CS, Crook JE, Diehl NN, Wallace MB. Impact of an Endoscopic Quality Improvement Program Focused on Adenoma Detection on Sessile Serrated Adenoma/Polyp Detection. Dig Dis Sci 2017; 62:1464-1471. [PMID: 28444509 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-017-4582-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2017] [Accepted: 04/18/2017] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sessile serrated adenomas/polyps (SSA/P) are an under-recognized disease with a unique malignant pathway. Improved endoscopic recognition and pathological interpretation is needed. AIMS To determine whether an educational intervention that improved adenoma detection rate (ADR) could improve SSA/P detection rate after reclassification of previously termed "hyperplastic" polyps. METHODS We reanalyzed data from a prospective randomized trial of an educational intervention aimed at increasing ADR. All hyperplastic polyps ≥6 mm reported in a previously published study were rereviewed and reclassified using standardized criteria for serrated lesions. Detection rates of sessile serrated adenomas/polyps and other clinically relevant serrated polyps were calculated in the baseline and post-training phases of the original study. RESULTS Of 263 available for rereview, 33 (12.5%) were reclassified as SSA/P (N = 32) or traditional serrated adenoma (TSA) (N = 1). Reclassification was more common in the right colon (18 vs. 8%, p = 0.02). Baseline SSA/P detection rate was 0.7% in the untrained group and 1.3% in the trained group. Post-training, the SSA/P detection rate increased to 2.1 and 1.5%, respectively. The clinically relevant serrated polyp detection rate at baseline was 14.2% in the untrained group and 11.3% in the trained group. After the educational intervention, the clinically relevant serrated polyp detection rates increased to 16.5 and 14.8% in the untrained and trained groups, respectively. The estimated odds of an endoscopist detecting either a SSA/P or other clinically relevant serrated polyp during colonoscopy increased by only 3% with the educational intervention (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.61-1.74, p = 0.91). CONCLUSIONS Pathological re-interpretation of larger serrated polyps resulted in the reclassification of 12.5% of lesions. Quality improvement methods focused on adenoma detection did not impact SSA/P detection, and thus specific methods for serrated polyp detection are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ronald G Racho
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Murli Krishna
- Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Susan G Coe
- Atlanta Gastroenterology Associates, Snellville, GA, USA
| | - Colleen S Thomas
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Julia E Crook
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Nancy N Diehl
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Michael B Wallace
- Division of Gastroenterology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
|
42
|
Herreros de Tejada A, González-Lois C, Santiago J. Serrated lesions and serrated polyposis syndrome. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS 2017; 109:516-526. [PMID: 28530106 DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.4065/2015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
The serrated pathway has been shown to be an alternative colorectal carcinogenetic route potentially accounting for up to one third of all CRCs. Serrated lesions, particularly SSPs, have been a focus of research during the past few years. They have well-established histological and molecular characteristics that account for their potential carcinogenetic risk through the accumulation BRAF, KRAS and methylator profile (CpG) mutations. Their endoscopic identification and resection represent a challenge because of their specific characteristics, and the need for an adequate specimen for histological diagnosis. Knowledge of these lesions is key, as is the adoption of established criteria for their endoscopic description and histological diagnosis. SPS is the maximum expression of involvement by serrated lesions, is associated with increased risk for CRC, and requires attentive endoscopic follow-up, as well as family screening. While the exact etiopathogenic mechanism remains unknown, current research will likely provide us with appropriate answers in the not too distant future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Carmen González-Lois
- Anatomía Patológica, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, España
| | - José Santiago
- Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, España
| |
Collapse
|
|
43
|
Maintaining low non-neoplastic polypectomy rates in high-quality screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 85:581-587. [PMID: 27597424 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.08.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2016] [Accepted: 08/23/2016] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Non-neoplastic polypectomies (NNPs) add pathology and procedural costs but do not reduce cancer risk and should be minimized. We sought to define the minimal non-neoplastic polypectomy rate (NNPR) for those colonoscopists achieving high-quality colorectal cancer screening based on adenoma detection rates (ADRs). METHODS NNPRs for colonoscopists achieving high-quality adenoma detection rates were reported to determine minimal NNPR goals. Two approaches to tracking NNPR monitoring were compared: (1) total NNPR, an NNPR inclusive of all non-neoplastic specimens with exclusion of only hyperplastic polyp, sessile serrated polyp, and adenoma; and (2) normal tissue-only NNPR, an NNPR inclusive of those specimens with only normal colonic mucosa or lymphoid follicles. RESULTS For those performing colonoscopy with high-quality ADRs (≥25%), half (6/12) of the colonoscopists had a total NNPR of ≤8.5% and 2 gastroenterologists had a total NNPR of ≤3.4%. The mean total NNPR of the cohort was 8.7% versus the normal tissue only NNPR, which was 7.5% (mean difference of 1.2%, standard deviation ± 0.97). The widest variation between total NNPR versus normal tissue only NNPR for any colonoscopist was 2.9%. The total NNPR ranged between 2.6% and 21.3% among 14 colonoscopists. CONCLUSIONS Colonoscopy with a high-quality ADR can be achieved while maintaining a low total NNPR. A total NNPR, inclusive of all non-neoplastic specimens as an alternative to an approach in which all specimens require individual review in order to select out only normal tissue can be considered for monitoring of NNPR.
Collapse
|
|
44
|
Abstract
Serrated polyps (SPs) of the colorectum pose a novel challenge to practicing gastroenterologists. Previously thought benign and unimportant, there is now compelling evidence that SPs are responsible for a significant percentage of incident colorectal cancer worldwide. In contrast to conventional adenomas, which tend to be slow growing and polypoid, SPs have unique features that undermine current screening and surveillance practices. For example, sessile serrated polyps (SSPs) are flat, predominately right-sided, and thought to have the potential for rapid growth. Moreover, SSPs are subject to wide variations in endoscopic detection and pathologic interpretation. Unfortunately, little is known about the natural history of SPs, and current guidelines are based largely on expert opinion. In this review, we outline the current taxonomy, epidemiology, and management of SPs with an emphasis on the clinical and public health impact of these lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Seth D Crockett
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
45
|
Yang PF, Wong SW. Adenoma Detection Rate in Colonoscopy: Is Indication a Predictor? Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2017; 26:156-61. [PMID: 26813239 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000000253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To describe factors that may influence adenoma detection rate (ADR), with an emphasis on the indication for colonoscopy. METHODS Consecutive colonoscopies performed by a single endoscopist between January 2008 and December 2014 were reviewed. Indications for colonoscopy were tested for association with ADR after adjusting for age and sex. RESULTS A total of 2648 colonoscopies were analyzed. Adenomas were detected in 630 patients (23.8%). Overall ADR was 22.9% in patients undergoing screening colonoscopy. ADR was higher in fecal occult blood test-triggered screening colonoscopies (32%) than colonoscopies performed for patients with a family history of colorectal cancer (21.7%) or asymptomatic average-risk individuals (20.4%) (P=0.05). ADR was 36.1% in patients undergoing surveillance colonoscopy and ranged from 12% to 30% in patients with gastrointestinal symptoms undergoing diagnostic colonoscopy. CONCLUSIONS ADR differs depending on whether the indication is screening, surveillance, or diagnosis. Within screening colonoscopies, ADR seems to be higher in patients with a positive fecal occult blood test.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phillip F Yang
- *Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital †Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales ‡Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Private Hospital, NSW, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
|
46
|
Bretagne JF, Hamonic S, Piette C, Viel JF, Bouguen G. Interendoscopist variability in proximal colon polyp detection is twice higher for serrated polyps than adenomas. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22:8549-8557. [PMID: 27784967 PMCID: PMC5064036 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i38.8549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2016] [Revised: 08/19/2016] [Accepted: 09/12/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM To assess the interendoscopist variability in the detection of colorectal polyps according to their location and histological type.
METHODS This study was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from a regional colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program; 2979 complete colonoscopies from 18 endoscopists were included. Variability in performance between endoscopists for detection of at least one adenoma (A), one proximal adenoma (PA), one distal adenoma (DA), and one proximal serrated polyp (PSP) was assessed by using multilevel logistic regression models.
RESULTS The observed detection rates among the 18 endoscopists ranged from 24.6% to 47.6% (mean = 35.7%) for A, from 19.1% to 39.0% (mean = 29.4%) for DA, from 6.0% to 22.9% (mean = 12.4%) for PA, and from 1.3% to 19.3% (mean = 6.9%) for PSP. After adjusting for patient-level variables (sex, age), the interendoscopist detection rates variability achieved a significant level for A, PA, and PSP but not for DA (P = 0.03, P = 0.02, P = 0.02 and P = 0.08, respectively). This heterogeneity, as measured by the variance partition coefficient, was approximately threefold higher for PA (6.6%) compared with A (2.1%), and twofold higher for PSP (12.3%) compared with PA.
CONCLUSION These results demonstrate significant interendoscopist variability for proximal polyp particularly for serrated polyps, but not for distal adenoma detection. These findings contribute to explain the decreased effectiveness of complete colonoscopies at preventing proximal CRCs and the need to carefully assess the proximal colon during scope procedure.
Collapse
|
|
47
|
Schramm C, Scheller I, Franklin J, Demir M, Kuetting F, Nierhoff D, Goeser T, Toex U, Steffen HM. Predicting ADR from PDR and individual adenoma-to-polyp-detection-rate ratio for screening and surveillance colonoscopies: A new approach to quality assessment. United European Gastroenterol J 2016; 5:742-749. [PMID: 28815039 DOI: 10.1177/2050640616675220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2016] [Accepted: 09/27/2016] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Adenoma detection rate (ADR) has been established as a quality indicator for screening colonoscopy. Because ADR is cumbersome to obtain in routine practice, polyp detection rate (PDR), polypectomy rate (PR) and adenoma-to-polyp-detection-rate-ratio (APDRR) have been proposed to estimate ADR. This study aimed to evaluate APDRR in order to estimate ADR (ADRest) in different settings. METHODS Average risk screening and surveillance colonoscopies from a community-based private practice and a tertiary academic hospital setting were retrospectively evaluated. APDRR was calculated as averaged group APDRR for all study procedures (APDRR) and for the first half of study procedures of each gastroenterologist (APDRRag) or individually for each gastroenterologist on the basis of his or her first 25, 50 and 100 colonoscopies (APDRRind). ADRest was determined from PDR by using APDRR, APDRRag, and APDRRind, respectively. RESULTS A total of 2717 individuals were analyzed. Using APDRR, significant correlations between ADR and ADRest were observed for the entire (0.944, p < 0.001), proximal (0.854, p < 0.001), and distal (0.977, p < 0.001) colon. These correlations were lost when APDRRag was used to estimate each gastroenterologist's ADR for the second half of his or her included colonoscopies. However, ADR and ADRest correlated significantly with a root-mean-square-error of 6.8% and 5.8% when APDRRind on the basis of each gastroenterologist's first 50 and 100 colonoscopies was used for subsequent colonoscopies. CONCLUSIONS ADR for subsequent colonoscopies of an individual endoscopist can be reliably estimated from PDR by using an individually calculated APDRR. Prospective studies are needed to verify this promising approach in different practice settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Schramm
- Department for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Cologne, Germany
| | - I Scheller
- Practice for Gastroenterology Remscheid, Remscheid, Germany
| | - J Franklin
- Institute for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Germany
| | - M Demir
- Department for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Cologne, Germany
| | - F Kuetting
- Department for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Cologne, Germany
| | - D Nierhoff
- Department for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Cologne, Germany
| | - T Goeser
- Department for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Cologne, Germany
| | - U Toex
- Department for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Cologne, Germany
| | - H M Steffen
- Department for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
|
48
|
Effect of Colonoscopy Volume on Quality Indicators. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 2016:2580894. [PMID: 27446831 PMCID: PMC4904556 DOI: 10.1155/2016/2580894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2015] [Accepted: 05/04/2016] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background. The purpose of this study is to determine if colonoscopy quality is associated with the annual case volume of endoscopists. Methods. A retrospective cohort study was performed on 3235 patients who underwent colonoscopy in the city of St. John's, NL, between January and June 2012. Data collected included completion of colonoscopy (CCR) and adenoma detection rates (ADR). Endoscopists were divided into quintiles based on annual case volume. To account for potential confounding variables, univariate analyses followed by multivariable logistic regression were used to identify variables independently associated with CCR and ADR. Results. A total of 13 surgeons and 8 gastroenterologists were studied. There was a significant difference in CCR (p < 0.001) and ADR (p < 0.001) based on annual volume. Following multivariable regression, predictors of successful colonoscopy completion included annual colonoscopy volume, lower age, male sex, an indication of screening or surveillance, and a low ASA score. Predictors of adenoma detection included older age, male sex, an indication of screening or surveillance, and gastroenterology specialty. Conclusion. Higher annual case volume is associated with better quality of colonoscopy in terms of completion. However, gastroenterology specialty appears to be a better predictor of ADR than annual case volume.
Collapse
|
|
49
|
East JE, Vieth M, Rex DK. Serrated lesions in colorectal cancer screening: detection, resection, pathology and surveillance. Gut 2015; 64:991-1000. [PMID: 25748647 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-309041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2014] [Accepted: 02/12/2015] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- James E East
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Michael Vieth
- Institute of Pathology, Klinikum Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Douglas K Rex
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
50
|
Barret M, Chaussade S, Coriat R. Detection rate of proximal serrated lesions: A new quality indicator for colonoscopy? Dig Liver Dis 2015; 47:441-2. [PMID: 25921276 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2015.03.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2015] [Accepted: 03/29/2015] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Maximilien Barret
- Gastroenterology Department, Hôpital Cochin, GHU Ouest, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de, Paris, France; Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Faculté de médecine, Paris, France
| | - Stanislas Chaussade
- Gastroenterology Department, Hôpital Cochin, GHU Ouest, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de, Paris, France; Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Faculté de médecine, Paris, France
| | - Romain Coriat
- Gastroenterology Department, Hôpital Cochin, GHU Ouest, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de, Paris, France; Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Faculté de médecine, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|