Similar to T1 colon cancer (CC), risk stratification may guide T2 CC treatment and reduce unnecessary major surgery. In this study, prediction models were developed that could identify T2 CC patients with a lower risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM) for whom (intensive) follow-up after local treatment could be considered.

A nationwide cohort study was performed involving pT2 CC patients who underwent surgery between 2012 and 2020, using data from the Dutch ColoRectal Audit, which were linked to the Nationwide Pathology Databank. Four machine learning models were evaluated to predict LNM.

LNMs were found in 1877/9803 patients (19.1%). Independent risk factors included (younger) age (odds ratio [OR] 0.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.979-0.990), left-sided CC (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.4-1.7), poor differentiation (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.4-2.2), and lymphovascular invasion (LVI; OR 4.1, 95% CI 3.6-4.7). A deficient mismatch repair (MMR) status significantly lowered the risk of LNM (OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.2-0.5). The general linear model demonstrated the highest prediction accuracy, achieving area under the receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.67 and 0.68, with good calibration. In the absence of risk factors, elderly patients (≥74 years of age) had a predicted risk of LNM of 10.7%, yet up to 30% experienced postoperative complications, with mortality rates reaching up to 3.5%. Patients with a deficient MMR status had a predicted risk of LNM of 6.1% if LVI was absent and the tumor was well-differentiated.

The risk of LNM should be weighed against surgical risks. The findings of this study will enable clinicians to make more deliberate considerations about these competing risks before making a shared decision.

Local resection (LR) in rectal cancer is indicated in stage T1N0M0 without unfavorable pathological factors, achieving oncologically satisfactory outcomes through transanal endoscopic surgery techniques. However, the initial step involves accurate staging and selection of these tumors through specific tests conducted in specialized colorectal units. For T2N0M0 tumors and T1 tumors with poor prognostic factors, the standard treatment is total mesorectal excision (TME), a procedure associated with high postoperative morbidity and mortality, functional impairments, and reduced quality of life. Therefore, new organ-preservation strategies are being explored as alternatives to TME. These include neoadjuvant therapy combined with LR, which has shown promising results, and neoadjuvant therapy followed by a "Watch and Wait" approach -where patients with complete clinical response are selected for strict surveillance- as an ideal future treatment, although there are still current challenges to be addressed.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a standardized therapeutic approach for early carcinoma of the digestive tracts. In this regard, the process of histopathological diagnosis requires standardization. However, the uneven development of healthcare in China, especially in eastern and western China, creates challenges for sharing a standardized diagnostic process.

To optimize the process of ESD specimen sampling, embedding and slide production, and to provide complete and accurate pathological reports.

We established a practical process of specimen sampling, created standardized reporting templates, and trained pathologists from neighboring hospitals and those in the western region. A training effectiveness survey was conducted, and the collected data were assessed by the corresponding percentages.

A total of 111 valid feedback forms have been received, among which 58% of the participants obtained photographs during specimen collection, whereas the percentage increased to 79% after training. Only 58% and 62% of the respondents ensured the mucosal tissue strips were flat and their order remained unchanged; after training, these two proportions increased to 95% and 92%, respectively. Approximately half the participants measured the depth of the submucosal infiltration, which significantly increased to 95% after training. The percentage of pathologists who did not evaluate lymphovascular invasion effectively reduced. Only 22% of the participants had fixed clinic-pathological meetings before training, which increased to 49% after training. The number of participants who had a thorough understanding of endoscopic diagnosis also significantly increased.

There have been significant improvements in the process of specimen collection, section quality, and pathology reporting in trained hospitals. Therefore, our study provides valuable insights for others facing similar challenges.

Immunotherapy of cancer is now an essential pillar of treatment for patients with many individual tumor types. Novel immune targets and technical advances are driving a rapid exploration of new treatment strategies incorporating immune agents in cancer clinical practice. Immunotherapies perturb a complex system of interactions among genomically unstable tumor cells, diverse cells within the tumor microenvironment including the systemic adaptive and innate immune cells. The drive to develop increasingly effective immunotherapy regimens is tempered by the risk of immune-related adverse events. Evidence-based biomarkers that measure the potential for therapeutic response and/or toxicity are critical to guide optimal patient care and contextualize the results of immunotherapy clinical trials. Responding to the lack of guidance on biomarker testing in early-phase immunotherapy clinical trials, we propose a definition and listing of essential biomarkers recommended for inclusion in all such protocols. These recommendations are based on consensus provided by the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) Clinical Immuno-Oncology Network (SCION) faculty with input from the SITC Pathology and Biomarker Committees and the Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer readership. A consensus-based selection of essential biomarkers was conducted using a Delphi survey of SCION faculty. Regular updates to these recommendations are planned. The inaugural list of essential biomarkers includes complete blood count with differential to generate a neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio or systemic immune-inflammation index, serum lactate dehydrogenase and albumin, programmed death-ligand 1 immunohistochemistry, microsatellite stability assessment, and tumor mutational burden. Inclusion of these biomarkers across early-phase immunotherapy clinical trials will capture variation among trials, provide deeper insight into the novel and established therapies, and support improved patient selection and stratification for later-phase clinical trials.

To explore the sub-regional histogram features of amide proton transfer-weighted (APTw) MRI, compared with those of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), in predicting the tumor budding (TB) grade of rectal cancer (RC).

This study prospectively enrolled 74 patients with pathologically confirmed RC, who underwent APTw MRI before surgery from July 2022 to March 2023. Hematoxylin-eosin staining was used for TB scoring. K-means clustering (K = 4-6) was applied to obtain multiple sub-regions (n = 3-5), and corresponding histogram features (including mean, standard deviation, minimum, maximum, and 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, and 90th quantile) of APT and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps were extracted and filtered using stepwise regression.

When K = 5, the K-means clustering is four sub-regions, showing the best prediction for TB grade compared to K = 4 or 6. When K = 5, there were significantly higher histogram features of the APT map in sub-regions 3 and 4 in the high TB grade group compared to the low-intermediate TB grade group. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and internal validation suggested that the predictive efficiency of the model was highest when K = 5, with AUC, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and kappa values of 0.92, 93%, 71%, 87%, and 0.65, respectively. There were no significant differences in the histogram features of each sub-region in the ADC map (p > 0.05).

The sub-regional histogram features of APTw images can help to distinguish the heterogeneous regions of RC, which can be used to predict the TB grade of RC.

Question Can the sub-regional histogram features of APTw MRI predict the tumor budding (TB) grade of rectal cancer (RC)? Findings Differences exist in histogram features of APT map subregions between high and low-intermediate TB grade groups; subregions of the APT map have different predictive abilities. Clinical relevance APT-weighted imaging might outperform DWI in predicting TB grade in RC.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common malignancy worldwide, and the stage of the tumour is closely related to clinical outcome. Bowel cancer screening programmes have resulted in the identification of colorectal cancer at earlier stages. Approximately 10% of patients with the earliest stage of CRC (i.e. pT1) will possess regional lymph node metastases (LNM). Therefore, if these patients have initially been treated by local resection (e.g. polypectomy), this subgroup will require surgical resection. Identification of pathological risk factors for LNM within locally resected pT1 CRC is a very important process during the histological assessment of these lesions. This paper describes the most commonly encountered and clinically significant difficulties in the histological assessment of these cases. These pitfalls are illustrated using four examples of locally resected pT1 CRC that were received by our department during routine diagnostic practice.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most prevalent cause of cancer-related death and the third most common cancer globally. Early-stage rectal cancer is defined by lesions confined to the bowel wall, without extension beyond the submucosa in T1 or the muscularis propria in T2, with no indication of lymph node involvement or distant metastasis. The gold standard for managing rectal cancer is total mesorectal excision (TME); however, it is linked to considerable morbidities and impaired quality of life. There is a growing interest in local resection and non-operative treatment of early RC for organ preservation. Local resection options include three types of transanal endoscopic surgery (TES): transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM), transanal endoscopic operations (TEO), and transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS), while endoscopic resection includes endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR), and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Although the oncological outcome of local resection of early rectal cancer is debated in the current literature, some studies have shown comparable outcomes with radical surgery in selected patients. The use of adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in early rectal cancer management is also controversial in the literature, but a number of studies have reported promising outcomes. This review focuses on the available literature regarding diagnosis, staging, and management strategies of early rectal cancer and provides possible recommendations.

Optimal management of T1 colorectal cancer (CRC) remains controversial. This study compared the long-term outcomes of endoscopic resection with additional surgical resection (ER + ASR) versus primary surgical resection (PS) in patients with T1 CRC and identified risk factors for lymph node metastasis (LNM). This retrospective cohort study included 373 patients with T1 CRC who underwent ER + ASR or PS between January 2010 and December 2020 at a tertiary center in Taiwan. Surgical and oncological outcomes, including recurrence rates, LNM, 5-year overall survival (OS), and 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified risk factors for LNM. No significant differences were observed between the ER + ASR and PS groups in surgical outcomes, recurrence rates, LNM, 5-year OS (93% vs. 89%, P = 0.18), or 5-year RFS (89% vs. 88%, P = 0.47). Patients with ≥ 2 high-risk factors had significantly lower 5-year OS and RFS compared to those with ≤ 1 risk factor (p < 0.01). Poor histology grade and lymphovascular invasion were independent risk factors for LNM. ER + ASR and PS had comparable long-term outcomes in patients with T1 CRC. A multidisciplinary approach and standardized protocols are required for optimal management of early-stage CRC.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a standardized procedure for intramucosal and slightly invasive submucosal colorectal cancers (CRC). However, the role of ESD for T1b (depth of submucosal invasion: ≥1,000 μm) CRC remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the long-term efficacy and safety of ESD for T1b CRC.

This study involved 50 patients with T1b CRC who underwent ESD, including 31 who received subsequent surgery (ESD + surgery group) and 19 who reported comorbidities or refused subsequent surgery (ESD-alone group). The clinical outcomes, lymph node metastasis (LNM) rate, and recurrence and survival rates were determined.

All the patients achieved en-bloc resection, and 41 patients achieved R0 resection. The mean tumor diameter was 31.2 ± 11.9 mm. LNM was detected in 3 (6%) cases, demonstrating high-grade tumor budding (Bd 2/3) and invasion depth of >1,500 um. LNM was significantly correlated with tumor budding (P = 0.030). The overall median follow-up period was 41.00 ± 27.69 months and 33.16 ± 19.05 months in the ESD-alone and ESD + surgery groups, respectively (P = 0.241). Two patients in the ESD group had local recurrence and two patients died. Patients in the ESD + surgery group reported no local recurrence, distant metastasis, or disease-related death. Recurrence (P = 0.074) and survival rates (P = 0.072) were not significantly different between the two groups.

The LNM rate was exceedingly low in patients with T1b. ESD is an effective and safe method for these patients. The necessity of additional surgical treatment after ESD should be comprehensively determined following the patient's characteristics.

Endoscopic procedures and surgery are common treatments for early colorectal cancer (CRC). However, only approximately 10% of patients who undergo surgery have lymph node metastases (LNM) detected on postoperative pathology, which often leads to overtreatment. This study aims to comprehensively analyze the risk factors for LNM in early CRC patients, establishing a predictive model to aid in treatment decisions.

This study reviewed the clinicopathologic data of patients with early CRC who underwent surgery from January 2015 to June 2023. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were employed to identify LNM risk factors. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and calibration curves were also constructed to verify the model's discrimination and calibration. A simplified scale was calculated to promote the risk stratification for LNM.

The study analyzed medical records of 375 patients. Of these, 37 (9.9%) cases had LNM. Univariate analysis identified age, nerve invasion, depth of submucosal invasion, histologic grade, LVI, and tumor budding as risk factors. The multivariate analysis confirmed histologic grade (OR, 13.403; 95% CI, 1.415-126.979; P = 0.024), LVI (OR, 6.703; 95% CI, 2.600-17.284; P < 0.001), and tumor budding (OR, 3.090; 95% CI, 1.082-8.820; P = 0.035) as independent predictors. The optimal nomogram, incorporating six risk factors, demonstrated strong predictability with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.837 (95% CI, 0.762-0.912). A simplified risk assessment scale with a total score of 19 points was developed.

The study developed a nomogram and a simplified risk assessment scale to predict LNM risk, potentially optimizing the management of early CRC patients.

Background: Resected rectal polyps with deep invasion into the submucosa (pT1b-sm2,3) or the muscle layer (pT2) are currently confronted with surgery due to non-curative resection. Aims: We evaluated the efficacy, safety, and locoregional control of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) and/or chemotherapy (CT) following endoscopic KAR (knife-assisted resection) in patients with invasive early rectal cancers who are unwilling or unsuitable for additional surgical resection. Methods: Fifty-one patients with early rectal cancers, pT1b or pT2, underwent post-resection adjuvant RT and/or CT in 15 centers worldwide. "En bloc" macroscopic resection, R0 resection, recurrence rate, and adverse events following resection and adjuvant therapy were recorded in a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Results: Diagnostic staging (38/51, 75%) was the main reason for ELE. Macroscopic "en bloc" resection was demonstrated in 50/51 (98%), with an average follow-up of 20.6 months. Endoscopic recurrence occurred in 7/51 (13.7%) of patients, with mean time for diagnosis of recurrence at 8.9 months. Adjuvant therapy consisted of RT in 49.0% (25/51), CT in 11.8% (6/51), and combined CRT in 39.2% (20/51) of the cases. Perforation, severe post-procedural bleeding, and incontinence were the most frequent complications. The absence of superficial ulceration was associated with macroscopic complete resection, while the lesions with lower budding stage, clear lateral margins, lesion size < 40 mm, and needle-type knife used were associated with less endoscopic recurrencies. Conclusions: Our data investigated adjuvant RT and/or CT after endoscopic KAR of infiltrative rectal cancers (pT1bsm2,3-pT2) as being safe and effective for locoregional control and providing a non-surgical treatment option for patients with a non-curative resection.

Objectives: To evaluate the agreement among radiologists in the evaluation of rectal cancer staging and restaging (after neoadjuvant therapy) and assess whether locoregional recurrence can be predicted with this information. Materials and Methods: Pre-neoadjuvant and after-neoadjuvant therapy magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations of 239 patients diagnosed with locally advanced rectal cancer were retrospectively reviewed by three radiologists. The agreement between the MRI findings (localization of tumor involvement, tumor coverage pattern, external sphincter involvement, mucin content of the mass and lymph node, changes in the peritoneum, MRI T stage, distance between tumor and MRF, submucosal sign, classification of locoregional lymph node, and EMVI) was discussed at the September 2023 meeting of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) and the interobserver and histopathological findings were examined. The patients were evaluated according to locoregional rectal cancer and lateral lymph node (LLN) staging, and re-staging was performed using MRI images after neoadjuvant treatment. The ability of the locoregional and LLN staging system to predict locoregional recurrence was evaluated. Results: Among the parameters examined, for the MRI T stage and distance between the tumor and the MRF, a moderate agreement (kappa values: 0.61-0.80) was obtained, while for all other parameters, the interobserver agreement was notably high (kappa values 0.81-1.00). LLNs during the restaging with an OR of 2.1 (95% CI = 0.33-4.87, p = 0.004) and a distance between the tumor and the MRF of less than 1 mm with an OR of 2.1 (95% CI = 1.12-3.94, p = 0.023) affected locoregional recurrence. A multivariable Cox regression test revealed that the restaging of lymph nodes among the relevant parameters had an impact on locoregional recurrence, with an OR of 1.6 (95% CI = 0.32-1.82, p = 0.047). With the LLN staging system, an increase in stage was observed in 37 patients (15.5%), and locoregional recurrence was detected in 33 of them (89.2%) (p < 0.001). Conclusions: LLN staging is not only successful in predicting locoregional recurrence among MRI parameters but is also associated with a very high level of interobserver agreement. The presence of positive LLN in the restaging phase is one of the most valuable MRI parameters for poor prognosis.

Approximately 10% of patients with submucosal invasive (T1) colorectal cancer (CRC) have lymph node metastasis (LNM). The risk of LNM can be stratified according to various histopathological factors, such as invasion depth, lymphovascular invasion, histological grade, and tumor budding.

T1 CRC with a low risk of LNM can be cured by local excision via endoscopic resection (ER), whereas surgical resection (SR) with lymph node dissection is required for high-risk T1 CRC. Current guidelines raise concern that many patients receive unnecessary SR, even though most patients achieve a radical cure. Novel diagnostic techniques for LNM, such as nomograms, artificial intelligence systems, and genomic analysis, have been recently developed to identify more low-risk T1 CRC cases. Assessing the curability and the necessity of additional treatment, including SR with lymph node dissection and chemoradiotherapy, according to histopathological findings of the specimens resected using ER, is becoming an acceptable strategy for T1 CRC, particularly for rectal cancer. Therefore, complete resection with negative vertical and horizontal margins is necessary for this strategy. Advanced ER methods for resecting the muscle layer or full thickness, which may guarantee complete resection with negative vertical margins, have been developed.

Although a necessary SR should not be delayed for T1 CRC given its unfavorable prognosis when SR with lymph node dissection is performed, the optimal treatment method should be chosen based on the risk of LNM and the patient's life expectancy, physical condition, social characteristics, and wishes.

Organ preservation strategies for patients with rectal cancer are increasingly common. In appropriately selected patients, local excision (LE) of pT1 cancers can reduce morbidity without compromising cancer-related outcomes. However, determining the need for completion surgery after LE can be challenging, and it is unknown if prior LE compromises subsequent total mesorectal excision (TME). The aim of this study is to describe the current management of patients with pT1 rectal cancers.

This is a retrospective national cohort study of the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group database, including patients with newly diagnosed pT1 cancers between 2016 and 2020. Patients were stratified according to treatment into LE alone, completion TME after LE or upfront TME. The treatment and outcomes of these groups were compared.

A total of 1056 patients were included. Initial LE was performed in 715 patients (67.7%), of whom 194 underwent completion TME (27.1%). The remaining 341 patients underwent upfront TME (32.3%). Patients undergoing LE alone were more likely to be male with low rectal cancers and greater comorbidity. No differences in specimen quality or perioperative outcomes were noted between patients undergoing completion or upfront TME. Eighty-five patients (15.9%) had lymph node metastases (LNM). Pathological risk factors poorly discriminated between patients with and without LNM, with similar rates seen in patients with zero (14.1%), one (12.0%) or two (14.4%) risk factors.

LE is a key component of the treatment of pT1 rectal cancer and does not appear to affect the outcomes of completion TME. Patient selection for completion TME remains a major challenge, with current stratification methods appearing to be inadequate.

Patients with early (T1) esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) are increasingly having definitive local therapy endoscopically. Endoscopic resection is not able to pathologically stage or treat lymph node metastasis (LNM). Accurate identification of patients having nodal metastasis is critical to select endoscopic therapy over surgery. This study aimed to define the risk of LNM in T1 EAC. A meta-analysis of studies of patients who underwent surgery and lymphadenectomy with assessment of LNM was performed according to PRISMA. Main outcome was probability of LNM in T1a and T1b disease. Secondary outcomes were risk factors for LNM and rate of LNM in submucosal T1b (SM1, SM2, and SM3) disease. Registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022341794). Twenty cohort studies involving 2264 patients with T1 EAC met inclusion criteria: T1a (857 patients) with 36 (4.2%) node positive and T1b (1407 patients) with 327 (23.2%) node positive. Subgroup analysis of T1b lesions was available in 10 studies (405 patients). Node positivity for SM1, SM2, and SM3 was 16.3%, 16.2%, and 29.4%, respectively. T1 substage (odds ratio [OR] 7.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.45-13.38, P < 0.01), tumor differentiation (OR 2.82, 95% CI 2.06-3.87, P < 0.01), and lymphovascular invasion (OR 13.65, 95% CI 6.06-30.73, P < 0.01) were associated with LNM. T1a disease demonstrated a 4.2% nodal metastasis rate and T1b disease a rate of 23.2%. Endoscopic therapy should be reserved for T1a disease and perhaps select T1b disease, which has a moderately high rate of nodal metastasis. There were inadequate data to stratify T1b SM disease into 'low-risk' and 'high-risk' based on tumor differentiation and lymphovascular invasion.

According to the current guidelines, additional surgery is performed for endoscopically resected specimens of early colorectal cancer (CRC) with a high risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM). However, the rate of LNM is 2.1-25.0% in cases treated endoscopically followed by surgery, indicating a high rate of unnecessary surgeries. Therefore, this study aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) model using H&E-stained whole slide images (WSIs) without handcrafted features employing surgically and endoscopically resected specimens to predict LNM in T1 CRC. To validate with an independent cohort, we developed a model with four versions comprising various combinations of training and test sets using H&E-stained WSIs from endoscopically (400 patients) and surgically resected specimens (881 patients): Version 1, Train and Test: surgical specimens; Version 2, Train and Test: endoscopic and surgically resected specimens; Version 3, Train: endoscopic and surgical specimens and Test: surgical specimens; Version 4, Train: endoscopic and surgical specimens and Test: endoscopic specimens. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve was used to determine the accuracy of the AI model for predicting LNM with a 5-fold cross-validation in the training set. Our AI model with H&E-stained WSIs and without annotations showed good performance power with the validation of an independent cohort in a single center. The AUC of our model was 0.758-0.830 in the training set and 0.781-0.824 in the test set, higher than that of previous AI studies with only WSI. Moreover, the AI model with Version 4, which showed the highest sensitivity (92.9%), reduced unnecessary additional surgery by 14.2% more than using the current guidelines (68.3% vs. 82.5%). This revealed the feasibility of using an AI model with only H&E-stained WSIs to predict LNM in T1 CRC.

The International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting proposes histological tumour type, lymphovascular invasion, tumour grade, perineural invasion, extent, and dimensions of invasion as risk factors for lymph node metastases and tumour progression in completely endoscopically resected pT1 colorectal cancer (CRC).

The aim of the study was to propose a predictive and reliable score to optimise the clinical management of endoscopically resected pT1 CRC patients.

This multi-centric, retrospective International Budding Consortium (IBC) study included an international pT1 CRC cohort of 565 patients. All cases were reviewed by eight expert gastrointestinal pathologists. All risk factors were reported according to international guidelines. Tumour budding and immune response (CD8+ T-cells) were assessed with automated models using artificial intelligence. We used the information on risk factors and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression to develop a prediction model and generate a score to predict the occurrence of lymph node metastasis or cancer recurrence.

The IBC prediction score included the following parameters: lymphovascular invasion, tumour buds, infiltration depth and tumour grade. The score has an acceptable discrimination power (area under the curve of 0.68 [95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.61-0.75]; 0.64 [95% CI 0.57-0.71] after internal validation). At a cut-off of 6.8 points to discriminate high-and low-risk patients, the score had a sensitivity and specificity of 0.9 [95% CI 0.8-0.95] and 0.26 [95% 0.22, 0.3], respectively.

The IBC score is based on well-established risk factors and is a promising tool with clinical utility to support the management of pT1 CRC patients.

Non-curative endoscopic resection of T1 colorectal cancer (CRC) carries a substantial risk of recurrence. However, previous studies have reported a significant proportion of cases in which the deep margin of endoscopic resection was positive for cancer due to the technical difficulties of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). With the advancement of endoscopic technology and techniques resulting in the reduction of positive resection margins, it is important to reassess the long-term prognosis and major risk factors for recurrence in cases of negative deep margins.

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with T1 CRC who underwent endoscopic resection between January 2006 and December 2021 with negative deep margins. The histological findings of the resected specimens were analyzed to determine the risk factors associated with the primary outcomes of this study, including recurrence and cancer-related deaths.

The median age of the 190 patients was 70 years, of which 63% were male, and endoscopic treatment was performed in 64% by endoscopic mucosal resection and 36% by ESD. Eighty-two patients were in the curative resection (CR) group and 108 were in the non-curative resection (NCR) group, wherein the latter comprised 79 patients who underwent additional surgery (AS) and 29 patients who did not receive AS. Five-year recurrence-free survival rates were 98.4% (95% CI: 89.3-99.8) for CR, 98.3% (95% CI: 88.8-99.8) for NCR with AS, and 73.7% (95% CI: 46.5-88.5) for NCR without AS. Lymphatic invasion and budding grade 2/3 were the major risk factors for recurrence, with hazard ratios of 40.7 (p < 0.001) and 23.1 (p = 0.007), respectively. Of the patients in the NCR group without AS, the 5-year recurrence-free rate was 85.6% (95% CI: 52.5-96.3) if there were no major risk factors (i.e., no lymphatic invasion or budding grade 2/3) (n = 21), whereas the prognosis was poor in the presence of one or more of the major risk factors, with a median recurrence-free survival and disease-specific survival of 2.5 and 3.1 years, respectively (n = 8).

In endoscopically resected T1 CRC with negative deep margins, lymphatic invasion or budding grade 2/3 may indicate a higher risk of recurrence when followed up without AS.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common malignancy worldwide and tumour stage is closely related to clinical outcome. A small but significant proportion of submucosal-invasive (ie, pT1) CRC are associated with regional lymph node metastases (LNM) and a worse prognosis. The likelihood of LNM in pT1 CRC needs to be balanced against the operative risk and costs of surgical resection when determining the best patient management. A wide range of histopathological and clinical factors may affect LNM risk in this setting. This script provides a comprehensive overview of the tumour and patient-associated features that have been linked to LNM risk in pT1 CRC. Some of the features are well established within the literature and are included in published guidelines, while others are novel and emerging in nature. Odds ratios for LNM that are associated with key predictive features are provided where appropriate, and published models developed as an aid to the calculation of LNM risk are discussed.

As endoscopic treatment enables en bloc resection of T1 colorectal cancers, the risk of recurrence, often assimilated to the risk of lymph node metastases, must be assessed in order to offer patients an additional treatment if this risk is deemed significant. The curative criteria currently used by most guidelines are depth of invasion <1 mm, well or moderately differentiated tumour, absence of lympho-vascular invasion, absence of significant budding and tumour-free resection margins. However, these factors must be assessed by qualified pathologists, as they are difficult to evaluate. Moreover, the combination of these factors leads to unnecessary surgery in over 80 % of patients whose tumours are classified as high risk. Refinement of current criteria and research into new tumour and immunological markers are needed to better predict the actual risk of our patients.

Since the introduction of population-based screening, increasing numbers of T1 rectal cancers are detected and removed by local endoscopic resection. Patients can be cured with endoscopic resection alone, but there is a possibility of residual tumor cells remaining after the initial resection. These can be located intraluminally at the resection site or extraluminally in the form of (lymph node) metastases. To decrease the risk of residual cells progressing towards more advanced disease, additional treatment is usually needed. However, with the currently available risk stratification models, it remains challenging to determine who should and should not be further treated after non-curative endoscopic resection. In this review, the different management strategies for patients with non-curatively treated T1 rectal cancers are discussed, along with the available evidence for each strategy and relevant considerations for clinical decision making. Furthermore, we provide practical guidance on the management and surveillance following non-curative endoscopic resection of T1 rectal cancer.

The field of artificial intelligence is rapidly evolving, and there has been an interest in its use to predict the risk of lymph node metastasis in T1 colorectal cancer. Accurately predicting lymph node invasion may result in fewer patients undergoing unnecessary surgeries; conversely, inadequate assessments will result in suboptimal oncological outcomes. This narrative review aims to summarize the current literature on deep learning for predicting the probability of lymph node metastasis in T1 colorectal cancer, highlighting areas of potential application and barriers that may limit its generalizability and clinical utility.

Risk assessment of disease recurrence in pT1 colorectal cancer is crucial in order to select the appropriate treatment strategy. The study aimed to develop a prediction model, based on histopathological data, for the probability of disease recurrence and residual disease in patients with pT1 colorectal cancer.

The model dataset consisted of 558 patients with pT1 CRC who had undergone endoscopic resection only (n = 339) or endoscopic resection followed by subsequent bowel resection (n = 219). Tissue blocks and slides were retrieved from Pathology Departments from all regions in Denmark. All original slides were evaluated by one experienced gastrointestinal pathologist (TPK). New sections were cut and stained for haematoxylin and eosin (HE) and immunohistochemical markers. Missing values were multiple imputed. A logistic regression model with backward elimination was used to construct the prediction model.

The final prediction model for disease recurrence demonstrated good performance with AUC of 0.75 [95% CI 0.72-0.78], HL chi-squared test of 0.59 and scaled Brier score of 10%. The final prediction model for residual disease demonstrated medium performance with an AUC of 0.68 [0.63-0.72].

We developed a prediction model for the probability of disease recurrence in pT1 CRC with good performance and calibration based on histopathological data. Together with lymphatic and venous invasion, an involved resection margin (0 mm) as opposed to a margin of ≤ 1 mm was an independent risk factor for both disease recurrence and residual disease.

The Society of Abdominal Radiology's Colorectal and Anal Cancer Disease-Focused Panel (DFP) first published a rectal cancer lexicon paper in 2019. Since that time, the DFP has published revised initial staging and restaging reporting templates, and a new SAR user guide to accompany the rectal MRI synoptic report (primary staging). This lexicon update summarizes interval developments, while conforming to the original lexicon 2019 format. Emphasis is placed on primary staging, treatment response, anatomic terminology, nodal staging, and the utility of specific sequences in the MRI protocol. A discussion of primary tumor staging reviews updates on tumor morphology and its clinical significance, T1 and T3 subclassifications and their clinical implications, T4a and T4b imaging findings/definitions, terminology updates on the use of MRF over CRM, and the conundrum of the external sphincter. A parallel section on treatment response reviews the clinical significance of near-complete response and introduces the lexicon of "regrowth" versus "recurrence". A review of relevant anatomy incorporates updated definitions and expert consensus of anatomic landmarks, including the NCCN's new definition of rectal upper margin and sigmoid take-off. A detailed review of nodal staging is also included, with attention to tumor location relative to the dentate line and locoregional lymph node designation, a new suggested size threshold for lateral lymph nodes and their indications for use, and imaging criteria used to differentiate tumor deposits from lymph nodes. Finally, new treatment terminologies such as organ preservation, TNT, TAMIS and watch-and-wait management are introduced. This 2023 version aims to serve as a concise set of up-to-date recommendations for radiologists, and discusses terminology, classification systems, MRI and clinical staging, and the evolving concepts in diagnosis and treatment of rectal cancer.

Implementation of population-based colorectal cancer screening programs has led to increases in the incidence of pT1 colorectal cancer. These incipient invasive cancers have a very good prognosis and can be treated locally, but more than half of these cases are treated with surgery due to the presence of histological high-risk criteria. These high-risk criteria are suboptimal, with no consensus among clinical guidelines, heterogeneity in definitions and assessment, and poor concordance in evaluation, and recent evidence suggests that some of these criteria considered high risk might not necessarily affect individual prognosis. Current criteria classify most patients as high risk with an indication for additional surgery, but only 2-10.5% have lymph node metastasis, and the residual tumor is present in less than 20%, leading to overtreatment. Patients with pT1 colorectal cancer have excellent disease-free survival, and recent evidence indicates that the type of treatment, whether endoscopic or surgical, does not significantly impact prognosis. As a result, the protective role of surgery is questionable. Moreover, surgery is a more aggressive treatment option, with the potential for higher morbidity and mortality rates. This article presents a comprehensive review of recent evidence on the clinical management of pT1 colorectal cancer. The review analyzes the limitations of histological evaluation, the prognostic implications of histological risk status and the treatment performed, the adverse effects associated with both endoscopic and surgical treatments, and new advances in endoscopic treatment.

The sole presence of deep submucosal invasion is shown to be associated with a limited risk of lymph node metastasis. This justifies a local excision of suspected deep submucosal invasive colon carcinomas (T1 CCs) as a first step treatment strategy. Recently Colonoscopy-Assisted Laparoscopic Wedge Resection (CAL-WR) has been shown to be able to resect pT1 CRCs with a high R0 resection rate, but the long term outcomes are lacking. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety, effectiveness and long-term oncological outcomes of CAL-WR as primary treatment for patients with suspected superficial and also deeply-invasive T1 CCs.

In this prospective multicenter clinical trial, patients with a macroscopic and/or histologically suspected T1 CCs will receive CAL-WR as primary treatment in order to prevent unnecessary major surgery for low-risk T1 CCs. To make a CAL-WR technically feasible, the tumor may not include > 50% of the circumference and has to be localized at least 25 cm proximal from the anus. Also, there should be sufficient distance to the ileocecal valve to place a linear stapler. Before inclusion, all eligible patients will be assessed by an expert panel to confirm suspicion of T1 CC, estimate invasion depth and subsequent advise which local resection techniques are possible for removal of the lesion. The primary outcome of this study is the proportion of patients with pT1 CC that is curatively treated with CAL-WR only and in whom thus organ-preservation could be achieved. Secondary outcomes are 1) CAL-WR's technical success and R0 resection rate for T1 CC, 2) procedure-related morbidity and mortality, 3) 5-year overall and disease free survival, 4) 3-year metastasis free survival, 5) procedure-related costs and 6) impact on quality of life. A sample size of 143 patients was calculated.

CAL-WR is a full-thickness local resection technique that could also be effective in removing pT1 colon cancer. With the lack of current endoscopic local resection techniques for > 15 mm pT1 CCs with deep submucosal invasion, CAL-WR could fill the gap between endoscopy and major oncologic surgery. The present study is the first to provide insight in the long-term oncological outcomes of CAL-WR.

CCMO register (ToetsingOnline), NL81497.075.22, protocol version 2.3 (October 2022).

Local en bloc resection of pT1 colon cancer has been gaining acceptance during the last few years. In the absence of histological risk factors, the risk of lymph-node metastases (LNM) is negligible and does not outweigh the morbidity and mortality of an oncologic resection. Colonoscopy-assisted laparoscopic wedge resection (CAL-WR) has proved to be an effective and safe technique for removing complex benign polyps. The role of CAL-WR for the primary resection of suspected T1 colon cancer has to be established.

This retrospective study aimed to determine the radicality and safety of CAL-WR as a local en bloc resection technique for a suspected T1 colon cancer. Therefore, the study identified patients in whom high-grade dysplasia or a T1 colon carcinoma was suspected based on histology and/or macroscopic assessment, requiring an en bloc resection.

The study analyzed 57 patients who underwent CAL-WR for a suspected macroscopic polyp or polyps with biopsy-proven high-grade dysplasia or T1 colon carcinoma. For 27 of these 57 patients, a pT1 colon carcinoma was diagnosed at pathologic examination after CAL-WR. Histological risk factors for LNM were present in three cases, and 70% showed deep submucosal invasion (Sm2/Sm3). For patients with pT1 colon carcinoma, an overall R0-resection rate of 88.9% was achieved. A minor complication was noted in one patient (1.8%).

The CAL-WR procedure is an effective and safe technique for suspected high-grade dysplasia or T1-colon carcinoma. It may fill the gap for tumors that are macroscopic suspected for deep submucosal invasion, providing more patients an organ-preserving treatment option.

The mortality of colorectal cancer patients with pelvic bone metastasis is imminent, and timely diagnosis and intervention to improve the prognosis is particularly important. Therefore, this study aimed to build a bone metastasis prediction model based on Gray level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM) - based Score to guide clinical diagnosis and treatment.

We retrospectively included 614 patients with colorectal cancer who underwent pelvic multiparameter magnetic resonance image(MRI) from January 2015 to January 2022 in the gastrointestinal surgery department of Gezhouba Central Hospital of Sinopharm. GLCM-based Score and Machine learning algorithm, that is,artificial neural net7work model(ANNM), random forest model(RFM), decision tree model(DTM) and support vector machine model(SVMM) were used to build prediction model of bone metastasis in colorectal cancer patients. The effectiveness evaluation of each model mainly included decision curve analysis(DCA), area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve and clinical influence curve(CIC).

We captured fourteen categories of radiomics data based on GLCM for variable screening of bone metastasis prediction models. Among them, Haralick_90, IV_0, IG_90, Haralick_30, CSV, Entropy and Haralick_45 were significantly related to the risk of bone metastasis, and were listed as candidate variables of machine learning prediction models. Among them, the prediction efficiency of RFM in combination with Haralick_90, Haralick_all, IV_0, IG_90, IG_0, Haralick_30, CSV, Entropy and Haralick_45 in training set and internal verification set was [AUC: 0.926,95% CI: 0.873-0.979] and [AUC: 0.919,95% CI: 0.868-0.970] respectively. The prediction efficiency of the other four types of prediction models was between [AUC: 0.716,95% CI: 0.663-0.769] and [AUC: 0.912,95% CI: 0.859-0.965].

The automatic segmentation model based on diffusion-weighted imaging(DWI) using depth learning method can accurately segment the pelvic bone structure, and the subsequently established radiomics model can effectively detect bone metastases within the pelvic scope, especially the RFM algorithm, which can provide a new method for automatically evaluating the pelvic bone turnover of colorectal cancer patients.

To investigate whether there is a differential impact of histopathological risk factors for lymph node metastases (LNM) in pedunculated and nonpedunculated pT1 colorectal cancers (CRC).

Tumor budding, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and venous invasion (VI) are recognized risk factors for LNM in pT1 CRC. Whether the importance of these factors varies according to tumor morphology is unknown.

Patients undergoing resection with lymphadenectomy for pT1 CRC in Denmark from January 2016 to January 2019 were identified in the Danish Colorectal Cancer Database and clinicopathological data was reviewed. Prognostic factors for LNM were investigated using multivariable analyses on the cohort as a whole as well as when stratifying according to tumor morphology (pedunculated vs. nonpedunculated).

A total of 1167 eligible patients were identified, of whom 170 had LNM (14.6%). Independent prognostic factors for LNM included LVI [odds ratio (OR)=4.26, P <0.001], VI (OR=3.42, P <0.001), tumor budding (OR=2.12, P =0.002), high tumor grade (OR=2.76, P =0.020), and age per additional year (OR=0.96, P <0.001). On subgroup analyses, LVI and VI remained independently prognostic for LNM regardless of tumor morphology. However, tumor budding was only prognostic for LNM in pedunculated tumors (OR=4.19, P <0.001), whereas age was only prognostic in nonpedunculated tumors (OR=0.61, P =0.003).

While LVI and LI were found to be prognostic of LNM in all pT1 CRC, the prognostic value of tumor budding differs between pedunculated and nonpedunculated tumors. Thus, tumor morphology should be taken into account when considering completion surgery in patients undergoing local excision.

With the prevalence of endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic full thickness resection, which enable complete resection of T1 colorectal cancer with a negative margin, the treatment strategy following endoscopic resection has become more important. The necessity of secondary surgical resection is determined on the basis of the risk of lymph node metastasis according to the histopathological findings of resected specimens because ~10% of T1 colorectal cancer cases have lymph node metastasis. The current Japanese treatment guidelines state four risk factors for lymph node metastasis: lymphovascular invasion, histological differentiation, depth of submucosal invasion, and tumor budding. These guidelines have succeeded in stratifying the low-risk group for lymph node metastasis, in which endoscopic resection alone is acceptable for cure. On the other hand, there are some problems: there is variation in diagnosis methods and low interobserver agreement for each pathological factor and 90% of surgical resections are unnecessary, with lymph node metastasis negativity. To ensure patients with T1 colorectal cancer receive more appropriate treatment, these problems should be addressed. In this systematic review, we gave some suggestions to these practical issues of four pathological factors as predictors.

ESGE recommends that the evaluation of superficial gastrointestinal (GI) lesions should be made by an experienced endoscopist, using high definition white-light and chromoendoscopy (virtual or dye-based).ESGE does not recommend routine performance of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or positron emission tomography (PET)-CT prior to endoscopic resection.ESGE recommends endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) as the treatment of choice for most superficial esophageal squamous cell and superficial gastric lesions.For Barrett's esophagus (BE)-associated lesions, ESGE suggests the use of ESD for lesions suspicious of submucosal invasion (Paris type 0-Is, 0-IIc), for malignant lesions > 20 mm, and for lesions in scarred/fibrotic areas.ESGE does not recommend routine use of ESD for duodenal or small-bowel lesions.ESGE suggests that ESD should be considered for en bloc resection of colorectal (but particularly rectal) lesions with suspicion of limited submucosal invasion (demarcated depressed area with irregular surface pattern or a large protruding or bulky component, particularly if the lesions are larger than 20 mm) or for lesions that otherwise cannot be completely removed by snare-based techniques.ESGE recommends that an en bloc R0 resection of a superficial GI lesion with histology no more advanced than intramucosal cancer (no more than m2 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma), well to moderately differentiated, with no lymphovascular invasion or ulceration, should be considered a very low risk (curative) resection, and no further staging procedure or treatment is generally recommended.ESGE recommends that the following should be considered to be a low risk (curative) resection and no further treatment is generally recommended: an en bloc R0 resection of a superficial GI lesion with superficial submucosal invasion (sm1), that is well to moderately differentiated, with no lymphovascular invasion, of size ≤ 20 mm for an esophageal squamous cell carcinoma or ≤ 30 mm for a stomach lesion or of any size for a BE-related or colorectal lesion, and with no lymphovascular invasion, and no budding grade 2 or 3 for colorectal lesions.ESGE recommends that, after an endoscopically complete resection, if there is a positive horizontal margin or if resection is piecemeal, but there is no submucosal invasion and no other high risk criteria are met, this should be considered a local-risk resection and endoscopic surveillance or re-treatment is recommended rather than surgery or other additional treatment.ESGE recommends that when there is a diagnosis of lymphovascular invasion, or deeper infiltration than sm1, or positive vertical margins, or undifferentiated tumor, or, for colorectal lesions, budding grade 2 or 3, this should be considered a high risk (noncurative) resection, and complete staging and strong consideration for additional treatments should be considered on an individual basis in a multidisciplinary discussion.ESGE recommends scheduled endoscopic surveillance with high definition white-light and chromoendoscopy (virtual or dye-based) with biopsies of only the suspicious areas after a curative ESD.