PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Esophageal cancer is one of the most common cancers in the world and carries a poor prognosis. While esophagectomy poses considerable mortality and morbidity risks, endoscopic resection can provide a safer and less invasive alternative. RECENT FINDINGS: Endoscopic resection therapy has allowed a less invasive approach with comparable outcomes to esophagectomy. EMR is considered safe and requires less intensive training, yet it does not offer complete histopathological assessment due to the nature of piecemeal resection for larger lesions. Alternatively, ESD offers an R0 resection, therefore allowing precise histopathological evaluation. Training in ESD is essential; however, a uniform training model has not been agreed upon. The Japanese apprenticeship training model has proven effective, with promising training outcomes from the Eastern experience. In the West, a comprehensive training model through a combination of apprenticeship with progressive exposure, including ex-vivo and live animal hands-on training, could be the optimal approach. Different methods of ESD training are currently available, all of which aim to provide the experience needed to perform safe ESD. Despite the differences in training styles between the East and the West, a modified apprenticeship model could potentially result in more effective and better training outcomes. The currently available technologies provide the environment to enhance ESD training.

Achalasia is an esophageal motility disorder characterized by absent esophageal peristalsis associated with failure of relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). Patients with achalasia may present with long-standing and slowly progressive dysphagia to solids and liquids, heartburn, regurgitation, refractory reflux symptoms and noncardiac chest pain. The esophagram and the timed barium swallow are useful imaging studies that may contribute to the diagnosis of achalasia and may be used to determine improvement after treatment. Esophagography is also ideally suited to evaluate potential post treatment complications. Treatment options for achalasia aim to disrupt the high-pressure LES to improve esophageal emptying, improve symptoms and prevent further dilatation of the esophagus. The most common treatment options currently include esophageal botulinum toxin (Botox) injections, pneumatic dilatation, Heller myotomy (often performed in conjunction with a fundoplication) and peroral endoscopic myotomy. Potential complications of these procedures may include intramural dissection, leak, scarring and fibrosis of the lower esophagus, strictures and problems related to gastroesophageal reflux and its associated complications. Radiologists must be aware of expected findings and potential complications following these procedures for timely and accurate diagnoses. The purpose of this paper is to describe treatment options for achalasia, illustrate expected imaging findings as well as imaging findings of potential early and long-term complications following treatment for achalasia.

The distribution of body weight in patients with achalasia and after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has not been investigated. The role of body weight assessment after treatment remains unclear.

Using the multicenter achalasia cohort, the frequency of underweight (body mass index [BMI] < 18.5 kg/m2) and overweight (BMI ≥ 25.0 kg/m2) and their associated clinical characteristics were analyzed. After POEM, risk factors for insufficient- (underweight persistently) and excessive- (responded to overweight) weight gainers were investigated. The correlation between BMI-increase rate and severity of esophageal symptoms post-POEM was evaluated.

Among 3,410 patients, 23.0% and 15.7% were underweight and overweight, respectively. Factors associated with underweight were higher age, female sex, severe symptoms, high lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure, and non-dilated esophagus (all p < 0.01). Longitudinal analyses revealed that weight gain post-POEM was achieved after a long duration (≥ 12 months; p < 0.01). In 528 patients post-POEM, the frequency of underweight reduced to 8.3% (p < 0.01). Risk factors for insufficient-weight gain (36.1% of underweight patients) included low BMI (p < 0.01) and high LES pressure (p = 0.03) and conversely for excessive-weight gain. Machine learning models based on patient characteristics successfully predicted insufficient- and excessive-weight gainers with an area under the curve value of 0.74 and 0.75, respectively. Esophageal symptoms post-POEM did not correlate with BMI increase.

Underweight is not solely a condition of advanced achalasia. After POEM, insufficient- or excessive-weight gainers are not rare and can be predicted preoperatively. Body weight change is an independent nutrition parameter rather than a part of the assessment of residual esophageal symptoms.

This retrospective study aimed to compare treatment outcomes and postoperative courses, including the incidence of esophageal cancer (EC), according to disease types, in 450 achalasia patients who underwent peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM).

Data from consecutive POEM procedures performed from September 2011 to January 2023 at a single institution were reviewed. Achalasia was classified into straight (St), sigmoid (S1), and advanced sigmoid (S2) types using esophagography findings. Regarding efficacy, POEM was considered successful if the Eckardt score was ≤3. A statistical examination of the incidence and trend of EC occurrence across the disease type of achalasia was conducted using propensity score matching.

Of the 450 patients, 349 were diagnosed with St, 80 with S1, and 21 with S2. POEM efficacy was 97.9% at 1 year and 94.2% at 2 years postprocedure, with no statistical difference between disease types. Using propensity score matching, the incidence of EC in each disease type was as follows: St, 1% (1/98); S1, 2.5% (2/77); S2, 10% (2/18). While no statistical significance was observed between St (1.0%: 1/98) and all sigmoid types (4.0%, 4/95; P = 0.3686). However, a trend test revealed a tendency for EC to occur more frequently in the order of S2, S1, and St type with a statistically significant difference (P = 0.0413).

Outcomes of POEM are favorable for all disease types. After POEM, it is important not only to monitor the improvement of achalasia symptoms but also to pay attention to the occurrence of EC, especially in patients with sigmoid-type achalasia.

Zenker's diverticulum peroral endoscopic myotomy (Z-POEM) is an effective treatment for symptomatic Zenker's diverticulum. A modification to Z-POEM involves mucosal flap incision (MFI). We describe the technical and clinical success of patients who underwent Z-POEM with MFI.We included patients who underwent Z-POEM with MFI for Zenker's diverticulum at eight international centers. The primary outcome was the rate of clinical success, assessed by post-procedure Kothari-Haber symptom score (KHSS) without re-treatment. Secondary outcomes included technical success, serious adverse events, and clinical recurrence with need for re-treatment.36 patients (age 69 [SD 9] years; 69% male) underwent Z-POEM with MFI for symptomatic Zenker's diverticulum. Mean diverticulum size was 3.2 (SD 1.4) cm. Clinical success was achieved in 35 patients (97%). Median baseline KHSS was 6 and median post-procedure KHSS was 0 (P < 0.001). Technical success was achieved in all cases. Mean procedure time was 57 (SD 34) minutes and median follow-up time was 196 days (interquartile range 39-499). There was one adverse event (3%), which was treated endoscopically.Z-POEM with MFI had high rates of technical and clinical success. Prospective evaluation is needed to further validate this technique in patients with a large Zenker's diverticulum.

Several studies have hypothesized that sparing the oblique/sling fibers during posterior peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) may reduce the incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and reflux esophagitis without compromising the established safety and efficacy of the procedure. This study compares perioperative, postoperative motility-related, and postoperative GERD-related outcomes between posterior oblique/sling fibers-sparing POEM (OFS-POEM) and conventional posterior POEM through a pairwise meta-analysis of comparative studies.

We conducted a systematic literature review following PRISMA guidelines to identify articles directly comparing posterior OFS-POEM with conventional posterior POEM. A pairwise meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model. Effect sizes were calculated as odds ratios for dichotomous data and mean differences for continuous data.

No significant differences were observed in perioperative outcomes, including mean gastric myotomy length, mean operative time, and incidence of adverse events. Similarly, no significant differences were noted in postoperative motility-related outcomes, such as mean Eckardt score and mean integrated relaxation pressure. However, a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of symptomatic GERD was observed in favor of OFS-POEM, with a number needed to treat (NNT) of 10 (95% CI: 6-49). Interestingly, no significant differences were found in the incidence of objectively diagnosed postoperative GERD, such as the number of patients with DeMeester scores >14 or the incidence of reflux esophagitis.

This study suggests that OFS-POEM may reduce the incidence of symptomatic GERD following POEM, without affecting the incidence of GERD diagnosed by pH studies (DeMeester score >14) or by endoscopy (reflux esophagitis). Future studies with larger sample sizes are needed to further investigate the impact of OFS-POEM on GERD incidence as determined by pH studies and endoscopic findings. Given the limitations of this study, no definitive conclusions can be drawn. Multicenter randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes are required to reach more reliable conclusions. Furthermore, stratifying data according to the type and class of achalasia would provide valuable information on whether there are differences in outcomes among the various types and classes of achalasia.

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a well-established endoscopic treatment for achalasia, utilizing an endoscopic knife for dissection. Recently, new knives with an integrated water-jet (WJ) function have been introduced. This study aims to compare the technical, perioperative, and late postoperative outcomes between WJ knives and conventional (C) knives, which lack the WJ function, through a pairwise meta-analysis of published comparative studies.

We conducted a systematic literature review following PRISMA guidelines to identify studies directly comparing knives with versus without a WJ function in POEM for achalasia. A random-effects model was employed, using odds ratios for dichotomous data and mean differences for continuous data as effect size metrics.

The use of WJ knives demonstrated statistically significant reductions in the mean number of intraoperative instrument exchanges, mean intraoperative use of coagulation forceps, and operative times compared to the use of C knives. There were no significant differences in terms of the incidence of adverse events, subcutaneous emphysema, or mean hospital length of stay (LOS). Clinical success, defined as a postoperative Eckardt score <3, mean postoperative Eckardt scores, and the incidence of GERD requiring proton pump inhibitors (PPI) also showed no significant differences.

The use of water-jet (WJ) knives demonstrates comparable efficacy to conventional (C) knives, with superior efficiency reflected in reduced operative time and fewer intraoperative instrument exchanges. In addition, in terms of safety, the lower use of coagulation forceps with WJ knives suggests reduced intraoperative bleeding. However, no significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of length of stay (LOS) and adverse events, despite a trend toward reduction. A larger number of studies with greater sample sizes is required to better assess potential differences in safety between the use of WJ and C knives.

Background: Shortening the myotomy length during peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for achalasia has been hypothesized to reduce gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) incidence while maintaining procedural efficacy. This meta-analysis compares the outcomes of short POEM (S-POEM) and long POEM (L-POEM). Methods: A systematic review adhering to PRISMA guidelines identified studies directly comparing S-POEM and L-POEM. Study quality was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions and Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias for Randomized Trials tools. A pairwise meta-analysis was conducted using the random-effects model. Results: In perioperative outcomes, S-POEM significantly reduced operative time and required fewer clips compared with L-POEM, with no significant differences in adverse events or length of stay. Regarding GERD-related outcomes, S-POEM demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in abnormal esophageal acid exposure on 24-hour pH-impedance testing, with a number needed to treat of 10. While the reduction in symptomatic GERD did not reach statistical significance (P = .06), the P value was very close to the threshold for significance (.05), and all seven included studies reported decreased symptomatic GERD with S-POEM. This is therefore considered a noteworthy finding. The rates of esophagitis and lower esophageal sphincter pressure did not differ significantly between the groups. Efficacy-related outcomes, including clinical success, Eckardt score, and barium height at 5 minutes, were comparable between S-POEM and L-POEM. However, integrated relaxation pressure was significantly higher in the S-POEM group. Conclusions: This study suggests that shortening the myotomy length may reduce GERD incidence following POEM without compromising its efficacy in achalasia treatment. In addition, a shorter myotomy length decreases operative time, potentially reducing time-related costs and improving workflow.

There is significant variability in the immediate post-operative and long-term management of patients undergoing per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM), largely stemming from the lack of high-quality evidence. We aimed to establish a consensus on several important questions on the after care of post-POEM patients through a modified Delphi process.

A steering committee developed an initial questionnaire consisting of 5 domains (33 statements): post-POEM admission/discharge, indication for immediate post-POEM esophagram, peri-procedural medications and diet resumption, clinic follow-up recommendations, and post-POEM reflux surveillance and management. A total of 34 experts participated in the 2 rounds of the Delphi process, with quantitative and qualitative data analyzed for each round to achieve consensus.

A total of 23 statements achieved a high degree of consensus. Overall, the expert panel agreed on the following: (1) same-day discharge after POEM can be considered in select patients; (2) a single dose of prophylactic antibiotics may be as effective as a short course; (3) a modified diet can be advanced as tolerated; and (4) all patients should be followed in clinic and undergo objective testing for surveillance and management of reflux. Consensus could not be achieved on the indication of post-POEM esophagram to evaluate for leak.

The results of this Delphi process established expert agreement on several important issues and provides practical guidance on key aspects in the care of patients following POEM.

Achalasia is an esophageal motility disorder of unknown etiology. However, no studies have determined the populations in which sleep problems occur and whether they are improved by peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). We investigated the rate of sleep problems assessed by GERD-Q (AGQ) in achalasia patients, evaluated whether POEM improves these issues, and identified factors associated with sleep improvement after POEM.

We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients who were diagnosed with achalasia and who underwent POEM at a single institution between March 2016 and December 2020. We examined the Eckardt symptom score and the GERD-Q before and 3 months after POEM to assess the presence of sleep problems (AGQ) and other symptoms. The univariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with sleep problem (AGQ) improvement after POEM.

A total of 177 patients were included. The average age was 52.6 ± 17.2 years. Preoperatively, dysphagia (172 [97.2%]), regurgitation (123 [69.5%]), sleep problems (AGQ; 110 [62.1%]), chest pain (102 [57.6%]), and weight loss (83 [46.9%]) were observed. Before POEM, 62.1% of patients experienced sleep problems (AGQ) compared with 9.6% after POEM (p < 0.0001). Postoperative dysphagia and regurgitation were significant factors determining whether patients continued to experience sleep problems (AGQ) after POEM.

Sleep problems (AGQ) were the third most common symptom in > 60% of patients with achalasia. Improving dysphagia and regurgitation using the POEM procedure improved sleep problems (AGQ).

Laparoscopic Heller miotomy of achalasia has been classically recognized as the gold standard management in children. There is increasing experience with the peroral endoscopic miotomy (POEM) approach in pediatrics, although the series published are scarce. The objective of this study was to present our experience in primary or secondary treatment of pediatric achalasia by POEM and its clinical success rate.

We performed a retrospective review of pediatric patients with achalasia who underwent POEM in some national centers from October 2016 to January 2023. We evaluated clinical efficacy (Eckardt score ≤3), demographic characteristics, intraoperative, preoperative and postoperative, complications, and follow-up.

Fifteen POEM were performed in fourteen pediatric patients (aged 12 to 18 years) with achalasia. POEM was the first line treatment in 11 patients, but 4 (21.3%) had previous treatment: 1 (7,1%) pneumatic balloon dilation and 2 (14,2%) laparoscopic Heller myotomy and 1 (7,1%) previous POEM. The average age was 15 years (SD±1,9). The baseline Eckardt score was 7,5 (SD:±1,8), with the baseline GERD score being 6 (SD:±2,9). There was a Clavien-Dindo grade 2 postoperative adverse event corresponding to mild pneumonia (7,1%). The postoperative Eckardt and GERD score after 12 months of follow-up were 0.7 (SD±1,2) and 0,5 (SD±0,7). The study has a success rate greater than 93%.

POEM seems a safe and effective procedure, with a short postoperative period for treatment of pediatric achalasia.

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is an established treatment for achalasia with compelling midterm efficacy. In this study, we analyzed the long-term efficacy, sought predictors of failure, and comprehensively assessed post-POEM reflux.

We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospective database of patients undergoing POEM at a high-volume center from December 2012 to June 2023. Patients who had completed a 3-month follow-up were included. Efficacy was assessed at 3, 6, and 8 years using the Eckardt score (ES). An ES ≤2 was considered treatment success. At 3 months, gastroscopy, manometry, 24-hour pH monitoring, and fluoroscopy were performed, and gastroscopy was repeated at 2 and 3 years. At each visit, patients were assessed for reflux symptoms and quality of life.

From 496 included patients, 3-, 6-, and 8-year follow-ups were completed in 302, 115, and 40 patients, respectively. The treatment success rates at 3, 6, and 8 years according to the Kaplan-Meier analysis were 90.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 87.2-93.3), 82.3% (95% CI, 77.3-87.6), and 73.5% (95% CI, 64.8-83.5), respectively. Year of procedure was the only predictor of outcome. Fifty-three patients (10.7%) encountered failure or recurrence. Treatment success of redo-POEM (n = 20) at 1 year was significantly lower (62.9% [95% CI, 44.3-89.2] vs 96.9% [95% CI, 95.3-98.5], P < .001). At 3 months, 40.4% of patients had reflux esophagitis (RE), 43.6% of patients had an acid exposure time >4.5%, 39.2% of patients were using proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), but only 24.2% had reflux symptoms. At 2 to 3 years, 50.8% of patients took PPIs, whereas 39.6% were symptomatic. RE decreased to 20.2% at 6 years.

The treatment success of POEM declines over time but remains sufficiently high in the long term. Experience with the procedure improves the outcome. Gastroesophageal reflux affects almost half of patients early after POEM and decreases substantially over time together with a rise in PPI use.

We present an update on the (peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) difficulty score [PDS] by introducing a novel knife with waterjet functionality.

This is a retrospective review of patients who underwent POEM between May 2018 and July 2023 at the Kingston Health Sciences Center. Demographic and procedural variables were compared using descriptive and inferential statistics.

One hundred thirty-nine consecutive POEMs were included in the study. Seventy-four (56.7% male; aged 56.7 ± 16.5 years) complex achalasia (CA) and 65 (55.4% female; aged 47.3 ± 20.2 years) non-CA POEM procedures were performed. PDS correlates moderately with procedural efficiency with a correlation coefficient of 0.595 (Spearman's p < 0.001). The mean efficiency for non-CA was 3.3 ± 1.2 min/cm compared to CA as follows: type III 3.3 ± 1.3 min/cm; prior myotomy 5.3 ± 2.3 min/cm; ≧4 prior procedures 4.0 ± 1.7 min/cm; sigmoid type 5.2 ± 2.4 min/cm. The median PDS for non-CA was 1 (1-5). In comparison, the median PDS for CA is as follows: type III 3 (2-4); prior myotomy 4 (3-5); ≧4 prior procedures 3 (1.25-4); sigmoid type 3 (2-4). PDS excluding the presence of spastic contractions correlated better with procedural velocity, with a correlation coefficient of 0.645 (Spearman's p < 0.001).

PDS continues to moderately correlate with procedural efficiency using the novel knife. The presence of spastic contractions correlated poorly with procedural efficiency. Thus, it may be omitted in further studies.

EG-840TP is a novel small-caliber therapeutic endoscope with a large working channel. We aimed to evaluate the treatment outcomes of peroral endoscopic myotomy using EG-840TP compared to those using a conventional therapeutic endoscope (GIF-H290T).

Patients who underwent peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia and non-achalasia esophageal motility disorders were enrolled between March 2021 and March 2023. Procedure times and other treatment outcomes were compared between patients treated with EG-840TP and GIF-H290T using propensity score matching analysis. In the subgroup analysis, patients were divided into subsets based on myotomy length, morphology, esophageal dilation, and operator skill, and the procedure time was compared between the matched groups.

A total of 154 patients were enrolled in this study, and 39 patients treated using each type of scope were matched. The EG-840TP group tended to have a shorter procedure time than the GIF-H290T group. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of short-term clinical success or perioperative adverse events. In the subgroup analysis, the procedure time of the EG-840TP group was significantly shorter than that of the GIF-H290T group when patients had a straight esophagus (44 min vs. 54 min, p = 0.0015) and the operator was a non-expert (49 min vs. 64 min, p = 0.031).

POEM using EG-840TP showed procedure time, clinical success, and adverse events equivalent to those of a conventional therapeutic endoscope. However, EG-840TP potentially contributed to a shorter procedure time in patients with a straight esophagus or in non-expert operators than GIF-H290T.

Predicting successful outcomes of gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM) is essential for identifying patients who are most likely to benefit from the procedure. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of the balloon dilation test (BDT) in optimizing patient selection for G-POEM.

A retrospective study was conducted from February 2021 to December 2023, including patients with refractory gastroparesis unresponsive to conventional medical treatments. All patients completed the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) questionnaire before and after G-POEM. The pyloric ring balloon dilation test was performed prior to G-POEM, with only patients who showed a positive response included. Procedural and clinical outcomes were analyzed.

Five patients (three female and two male) with refractory gastroparesis were included. The median G-POEM procedure time was 60 minutes (interquartile range [IQR] 32.5-110), and technical success was achieved in all cases. At a median follow-up of 10 months (IQR 6-34), clinical response was observed in all patients (100%). The GCSI score improved significantly from a median of 17 (IQR 8-33) to 0 (IQR 0-4.5; p < 0.03) indicating significant improvement in clinical symptoms.

A positive response to the balloon dilation test appears to be a reliable predictor of successful short-term outcomes following G-POEM in patients with refractory gastroparesis.

Most patients who were included in previous studies on achalasia had increased lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has been confirmed to be effective at relieving the clinical symptoms of achalasia associated with increased LES pressure.

To identify the safety and efficacy of POEM for patients with normal LES integrated relaxation pressure (LES-IRP).

The clinical data of patients who underwent POEM successfully in The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 481 patients who underwent preoperative high-resolution manometry (HRM) at our hospital were ultimately included in this research. According to the HRM results, the patients were divided into two groups: 71 patients were included in the normal LES-IRP group (LES-IRP < 15 mmHg) and 410 patients were included in the increased LES-IRP group (LES-IRP ≥ 15 mmHg). Clinical characteristics, procedure-related parameters, adverse events, and outcomes were compared between the two groups to evaluate the safety and efficacy of POEM for patients with normal LES-IRP.

Among the 481 patients included in our study, 209 were males and 272 were females, with a mean age of 44.2 years. All patients underwent POEM without severe adverse events. The median pre-treatment Eckardt scores of the normal LES-IRP and increased LES-IRP groups were 7.0 and 7.0 (P = 0.132), respectively, decreasing to 1.0 and 1.0 post-treatment (P = 0.572). The clinical success rate of the normal LES-IRP group was 87.3% (62/71), and that of the increased LES-IRP group was 91.2% (374/410) (P = 0.298). Reflux symptoms were measured by the GerdQ questionnaire, and the percentages of patients with GerdQ scores ≥ 9 in the normal LES-IRP and increased LES-IRP groups were 8.5% and 10.7%, respectively (P = 0.711). After matching, the rates of clinical success and the rates of GerdQ score ≥ 9 were not significantly different between the two groups.

Our results suggest that POEM is safe and effective for achalasia and patients with normal LES-IRP. In addition, in patients with normal LES-IRP, compared with those with increased LES-IRP, POEM was not associated with a greater incidence of reflux symptoms.

The efficacy and safety of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for spastic esophageal disorders (SED), including type III achalasia, distal esophageal spasm (DES), and jackhammer esophagus (JE), remain uncertain due to its rarity. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes and optimal strategies for managing SED.

A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent POEM for SED between March 2014 and December 2023. Myotomy was tailored to target spastic segments in all cases. For type III achalasia, the myotomy extended into the gastric cardia, while for DES and JE, the procedure either preserved the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) or included a gastric myotomy. Outcomes assessed included procedural details, technical and clinical success, adverse events, and the incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) post-POEM. Clinical success was defined as an Eckardt score of ≤3.

Among 2938 POEM procedures, 106 (3.6%) were for SED. The cohort included 58 patients (54.8%) with type III achalasia, 24 (22.6%) with DES, and 24 (22.6%) with JE. The technical success rate was 100%, with clinical success rates of 98.1% at 2-3 months and 92.6% at 1 year. Erosive esophagitis occurred in 27.7% at 2-3 months and 16.1% at 1 year. LES-preserving POEM for DES and JE showed comparable efficacy to POEM with gastric myotomy, with a trend toward reduced GERD incidence.

Peroral endoscopic myotomy is an effective treatment for all types of SED. LES-preserving POEM is a viable strategy for treating DES and JE, offering comparable efficacy, while potentially minimizing GERD risk.

Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) and its long-term sequelae remain a concern following peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). POEM with fundoplication (POEM-F) is simultaneous fundoplication via pure natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of POEM-F in mitigating post-POEM GER.

We performed a comprehensive electronic database search from January 2008 through June 2024 for studies evaluating outcomes of POEM-F performed for managing post-POEM GER. Pooled proportions were calculated using random-effects models. Heterogeneity was assessed using I 2 and Q statistics.

We included seven studies comprising 127 patients. Pooled technical success for POEM was 96.90%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 91.40-98.90. Pooled technical success of fundoplication was 92.30%; 95% CI 85.20-96.10. Clinical success in treating achalasia was 96.40%; 95% CI 90.70-98.60. Rate of wrap integrity on follow-up was 84.00%; 95% CI 66.00-93.40. Composite clinical success of POEM-F in mitigating post-POEM GER was 86.20%; 95% CI 73.80-93.20. Mean total procedure duration and fundoplication time was 115.74 minutes; 95% CI 103.53-126.96 and 55.28 minutes; 95% CI 47.35-63.20, respectively. The overall pooled major adverse events (AE) rate was 3.60%; 95% CI 1.40-9.40.

POEM-F is an effective procedure with an acceptable AE rate in expert hands. It appears to offer clinical benefit in mitigating post-POEM GER. However, further standardization for evaluating clinically significant post-POEM GER and long-term benefit of POEM-F is warranted.

Achalasia is a primary esophageal motility disorder, which shows impaired relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and the absence of peristalsis, leading to dysphagia, weight loss, and chest pain. In recent years, peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has become a popular method for treating achalasia. However, the effectiveness and safety of full-thickness myotomy (FTM) versus circular muscle myotomy (CMM) in POEM require further investigation.

This retrospective single-center analysis studied 152 patients who underwent POEM surgery at the General Hospital of the Western Theater Command from May 2014 to May 2023. Patients were divided into two groups based on the depth of myotomy: the FTM group and the CMM group. Parameters such as surgical success rate, procedure time, and myotomy length were evaluated, and treatment efficacy was assessed based on the Eckardt score. Postoperative complications and efficacy were also monitored.

Technical success was achieved in both groups, with shorter procedure times in the FTM group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in postoperative Eckardt scores and symptom improvement between the FTM and CMM groups. The incidence of adverse events was similar in both groups. The incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) seemed to be higher in the FTM group, although this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.051).

For patients with achalasia, there were no significant differences in short-to-medium-term treatment efficacy and safety between FTM and CMM in POEM. Although FTM significantly reduced procedure time, it may lead to a higher incidence of GERD. More cases are needed in the future to explore the more appropriate myotomy for different achalasia subtypes.

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) shows higher efficacy than pneumatic balloon dilation (PBD) for type I and II achalasia over 2 years. However, long-term durability beyond 5 years remains under-investigated. This study assessed the long-term efficacy of PBD versus POEM.

This retrospective comparative study examined treatment-naïve achalasia patients who underwent either PBD or POEM. Cohort balance was achieved through propensity score (PS) matching based on age, sex, Eckardt score, and Charlson Comorbidity Index. The primary outcome was the time to a second intervention. Secondary outcomes were treatment failure, Eckardt score, number of intervention sessions, weight gain, and adverse events.

Of the 127 patients, 67 underwent PBD and 60 underwent POEM, with an average follow-up of 7 years (interquartile range, 5-10). After PS matching, 100 patients with 1:1 matching were included in the analysis. Baseline characteristics, including clinical, endoscopic, and manometric attributes, were comparable between groups. The POEM group had a significantly longer time to a second intervention than the PBD group (hazard ratio, .139; 95% confidence interval, .048-.405) and underwent less endoscopic sessions (P < .001 by linear marginal model analysis) within the first 2 years. Beyond 2 years, subsequent interventions were comparable between groups. There were no differences in the Eckardt score or weight gain. Hospital stays were shorter in the PBD group (2 vs 4 days, P < .001). POEM patients had more adverse events, including perforation.

POEM demonstrated greater long-term durability than PBD, but PBD was associated with shorter hospital stays and fewer adverse events.

The gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) consists of various anatomical components that together form a barrier to prevent reflux of gastric content. This study introduces a novel phase concept to dynamically evaluate the antireflux barrier (ARB) during endoscopy and analyzes its functionality.

We reviewed previously the recorded endoscopic videos of subjects who underwent the endoscopic pressure study integrated system (EPSIS) from February to April 2024 for indications other than gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms. This device was used as an auxiliary tool to measure intragastric pressure (IGP) during endoscopy with a retroflex view. The ARB dynamic was divided into three phases: Phase I (gastric phase), Phase II (lower esophageal sphincter phase), and Phase III (esophageal clearance phase). We evaluated the morphological changes in the ARB during insufflation using EPSIS.

The median age of the 30 subjects was 58 years (interquartile range [IQR] 46.5-68.8), including 20 men and 10 women. Endoscopic findings and IGPs were recorded during the three phases. In Phase I, at low IGP (median 6.75 mmHg), the gastroesophageal flap valve and longitudinal folds were observed in 80% of cases. In Phase II, at moderate IGP (median 11.8 mmHg), the scope holding sign was observed in 86.7%. In Phase III, at high IGP (median 19 mmHg) inducing belching, peristalsis was observed in 80% of cases with median recovery time of 5 s.

The phase concept provides a valuable framework for understanding the antireflux mechanism. Further research is needed to validate these findings in GEJ disorders and explore correlations with other modalities.

Early identification of patients needing hospital-specific interventional care (HIC) following endoscopic treatment is valuable for optimizing postoperative hospital stays. We aimed to develop and validate a risk-scoring system for predicting HIC in patients who underwent peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM).

This study included patients with esophageal motility disorders who underwent POEM at our hospital between April 2015 and March 2023. HIC was defined as any of the following situations: fasting for gastrointestinal rest to manage adverse events (AEs); intravenous administration of medications such as antibiotics and blood transfusion; endoscopic, radiologic, and surgical interventions; intensive care unit management; or other life-threatening events. A risk-scoring system for predicting HIC after postoperative day (POD) 1 was developed using multivariable logistic regression and was internally validated using bootstrapping and decision curve analysis.

Of the 589 patients, 50 (8.5%) experienced HIC after POD1. Risk scores were assigned for four factors as follows: age (0 points for <70 years, 1 point for 70-79 years, 2 points for ≥80 years), preoperative prognostic nutritional index (0 points for >45, 1 point for 40-45, 4 points for <40), postoperative surgical site AEs on second-look endoscopy (7 points), and postoperative pneumonia on chest radiography (6 points). The discriminative ability (concordance statistics, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.78-0.91) and calibration (slope 1.00; 0.74-1.28) were satisfactory. The decision curve analysis demonstrated its clinical usefulness.

This risk-scoring system can predict the HIC after POD1 and provide useful information for determining discharge.

This study aims to compare the effectiveness and safety of traditional endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), endoscopic submucosal tunneling dissection (ESTD), and endoscopic submucosal dissection with C-shaped incision (ESD-C) in the treatment of superficial esophageal cancer and precancerous lesions, providing reference and guidance for the treatment of esophageal cancer.

A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of patients who underwent ESD (n = 96), ESTD (n = 103), and ESD-C (n = 98) for superficial esophageal cancer or precancerous lesions between January 2017 and December 2022. Through comparative analysis, the effectiveness and safety of the three surgical methods were evaluated, and the risk factors for postoperative esophageal stricture were explored.

In terms of total operative time and dissection time, the ESD group > ESTD group > ESD-C group; in terms of dissection speed, the ESD group < ESTD group < ESD-C group; in terms of dissection area, the ESD group < ESTD group and ESD-C group; and in terms of wound treatment time, the ESD group > ESTD group and ESD-C group. In terms of surgical outcomes, the en bloc resection rate was 100% in all three groups, with complete resection rates of 86.84%, 90.79%, and 88.16% in the ESD, ESTD, and ESD-C groups, respectively. The risk factors for postoperative esophageal stricture included dissection area, circumferential proportion of the lesion, and injury to the muscularis propria.

Among the three surgical approaches, ESD-C demonstrated superior performance in operative time, resection speed, and procedural efficiency. Increased circumferential involvement of the lesion, larger resection area, and greater injury to the muscularis propria were associated with a heightened risk of postoperative esophageal stricture.

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has revolutionized the treatment of upper gastrointestinal tract motility disorders, particularly achalasia. This editorial explores the efficacy, safety, and challenges of POEM, emphasizing its role as a primary treatment with excellent long-term outcomes and minimal adverse events. The evolution of POEM underscores the need for precision in myotomy techniques and the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration, especially regarding anesthetic considerations. Despite significant advances, challenges remain in standardizing safety protocols and managing complications. As POEM applications expand, precision endoscopy continues to enhance therapeutic outcomes, promising a transformative impact on gastrointestinal motility disorder management.

Blunt dissection is not commonly performed in flexible endoscopic procedures. We developed a novel blunt dissection device and evaluated its feasibility, safety, and potential effectiveness in third space endoscopy procedures.

The device consists of a cotton swab and a flexible shaft. To evaluate its functionality, creation of 4-cm submucosal tunnels in live swine stomachs was attempted by either blunt dissection using our device or sharp dissection using a standard monopolar knife. Data on factors such as completion rate, operating time, adverse events, necessity of submucosal injection, and dissected submucosal thickness were collected.

Eighteen submucosal tunnels were successfully created (sharp: 9, blunt: 9) by two experienced endoscopists and one novice endoscopist. Median operating time was significantly shorter in the blunt dissection group (239 vs. 429 s, P = 0.008). In the sharp dissection group, the experienced endoscopists did not cause any muscle layer injuries, but the novice endoscopist caused muscle layer injuries in all cases. In the blunt dissection group, neither experienced nor novice endoscopists caused muscle layer injuries. The blunt dissection group required significantly fewer submucosal injections (0 vs. 5, P < 0.001). Median dissected submucosal thickness was similar between the groups.

Blunt dissection using our device was feasible, safe, and potentially effective in third space endoscopy procedures by shortening operating time, reducing submucosal injections, and potentially minimizing muscle layer injury.

Cricopharyngeal achalasia is a rare esophageal motility disorder characterized by the inability to relax of the cricopharyngeal muscle during swallowing. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a minimally invasive endoscopic technique for treating achalasia that has gained increasing popularity in recent years. In this context, cricopharyngeal peroral endoscopic myotomy (C-POEM) has emerged as a novel technique for the management of cricopharyngeal achalasia.

Achalasia is an incurable condition of the esophagus involving the inflammation and degeneration of inhibitory neurons of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) resulting in failure of the LES to relax. Typical symptoms of achalasia are dysphagia, retrosternal chest pain, regurgitation, and weight loss. Three studies are typically required for the diagnosis of achalasia: barium swallow, high-resolution esophageal manometry, and esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Differential diagnosis includes gastroesophageal reflux disease, pseudoachalasia, neoplasm, and nonachalasia esophageal motility disorders such as scleroderma, jackhammer esophagus, distal esophageal spasm, and nutcracker esophagus.

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has become the treatment of choice for achalasia. However, the impact of myotomy length on POEM outcomes remains unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the outcomes of short versus standard-length myotomy in achalasia patients.

We conducted a comprehensive search in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases to identify all RCTs that compared POEM using short myotomy with standard myotomy. The primary outcomes were clinical success and post-operative gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The secondary outcomes were procedural time, length of hospital stay, and intraprocedural complications. Pooled odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

Three RCTs with 365 achalasia patients treated with short (n = 179) or standard (n = 186) myotomy were included. Short and standard myotomies showed similar clinical success (OR 1.95, 95% CI 0.61-6.23, p = 0.26; I2 = 41%), reflux symptoms (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.49-1.89, p = 0.92; I2 = 20%), pathologic acid exposure on pH monitoring (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.33-1.50, p = 0.36; I2 = 58%), reflux esophagitis on upper endoscopy (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.40-1.70, p = 0.59; I2 = 42%), intraprocedural complications (OR 1.22, 95% CI 0.53-2.79, p = 0.65; I2 = 0%), and length of hospital stay (MD - 0.01, 95% CI - 0.72 to 0.69, p = 0.97, I2 = 73%). Procedural time was shorter in short myotomy (MD - 16.11 min, 95% CI - 26.04 to - 6.19, p = 0.001; I2 = 84%).

POEM using short myotomy for achalasia is non-inferior to standard myotomy for efficacy, safety, and post-operative GERD but is associated with a shorter procedural time.

Patients with sigmoid-type achalasia can be challenging to treat with peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). A short myotomy improves technical success; however, outcomes have not previously been evaluated.

This was a multicenter, international, retrospective study of patients who underwent POEM with short (≤4 cm) or standard esophageal myotomy. Outcomes included clinical and technical success, procedural adverse events, and reflux rates.

A total of 109 patients with sigmoid achalasia (sigmoid, n = 74; advanced sigmoid, n = 35) underwent POEM across 13 centers (short myotomy, n = 59; standard, n = 50). Technical success was 100% across both groups. Patients who underwent short myotomy had a significantly shorter mean procedure time (57.7 ± 27.8 vs 83.1 ± 44.7 minutes, P = .0005). A total of 6 adverse events were recorded in 6 patients (5.5%; 4 mild, 2 moderate); the adverse event rate was not significantly different between short and standard groups. Ninety-eight patients had follow-up data (median, 3.6 months; interquartile range, 1-14 months). Clinical success was 94% (short, 93%; standard, 95%; P = .70) and did not differ based on achalasia subtype or sigmoid achalasia severity. Twenty-one (22%) patients reported post-POEM reflux and 44% (16 of 36) had objective evidence of pathologic reflux. Rates of pathologic reflux were significantly increased in the standard versus short group (odds ratio, 18.0; 95% confidence interval, 2.0-159.0; P = .009).

POEM with short myotomy is effective and safe for the short-term treatment of sigmoid and advanced sigmoid achalasia. Short myotomy may lead to less reflux than standard myotomy.

The endoscopic pressure study integrated system (EPSIS) is an endoscopic diagnostic system utilized for evaluation of lower esophageal sphincter function. Although previous studies have determined that EPSIS was effective as a tool for the diagnosis of achalasia, it remains uncertain if EPSIS can detect significant changes before and after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM), which is the premier treatment for achalasia. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of EPSIS as an objective diagnostic tool for assessing the clinical effect of POEM.

We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent POEM from January 2022 to December 2023. The patients underwent EPSIS preoperatively and 2 months postoperatively. Intragastric pressure (IGP) parameters, including the maximum IGP, IGP difference, and waveform gradient were compared pre- and post-POEM. These parameters also were compared between two groups: the postoperative gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) group and the non-GERD group.

A total of 50 patients were analyzed. The mean maximum IGP was significantly lower postoperatively than preoperatively (15.0 mmHg vs. 19.8 mmHg, P < 0.001). The mean IGP difference and waveform gradient were also significantly lower postoperatively than preoperatively (8.0 mmHg vs. 12.2 mmHg, P < 0.001; and 0.26 mmHg/s vs. 0.43 mmHg/s, P < 0.001, respectively). The mean postoperative waveform gradient was significantly lower in the GERD group (17 patients, 34%) than in the non-GERD group (33 patients, 66%) (0.207 mmHg vs. 0.291 mmHg, P = 0.034).

The results supported the use of EPSIS as an effective diagnostic tool for assessing the effect of POEM.

Open surgery is the standard treatment for fibroadipose vascular anomalies (FAVA). This study evaluated an endoscopic approach for FAVA, assessing its safety and feasibility.

Data from October 1, 2019, and May 1, 2024, were analyzed from the Vascular Anomalies Center database at our institution. Patients with FAVA Stage I (pain stage) or II (contracture stage) were included and divided into the endoscopic surgery group (ESG) and open surgery group (OSG).

In total, 101 patients underwent 110 procedures. In ESG, 42 patients (16 males and 26 females; 31 with Stage I and 11 with Stage II) underwent radical excision (with tendon lengthening in 2 patients). Ten patients underwent an open surgery. In OSG, 63 patients (18 males and 45 females; 30 with Stage I and 33 with Stage II) underwent radical excision (with tendon lengthening in 12 patients). The OSG had significantly shorter operative time than the ESG (p = 0.009). Furthermore, The OSG had longer hospitalization time (p = 0.022) than the ESG. The blood loss in the OSG was greater than that in the ESG, but without statistical difference (p = 0.069). During follow-up, the incidence of wound complications (p = 0.121) and residual symptoms (p = 0.179) were slightly higher in the OSG.

Endoscopic surgery is a safe and effective treatment for FAVA, promoting faster habilitation and improved patient satisfaction. This method may also serve as a reference for the excision of other benign muscle and soft tissue masses.