Although recurrence after curative surgery for cT1bN0M0 clinical stage I (cStage I) esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is not rare, reports of recurrence analyses are sparse. Detailed data on optimal postoperative follow-up evaluation of cStage I ESCC are lacking. This study aimed to evaluate the frequency, characteristics, and predictors of postoperative recurrence in patients with cT1bN0M0 cStage I ESCC.

The study analyzed 210 patients who underwent surgery for cT1bN0M0 cStage I ESCC and a follow-up computed tomography (CT) examination in the prospective multicenter study, JCOG0502. The study categorized the characteristics of postoperative recurrences such as the recurrence sites and whether regional/non-regional lymph nodes (LNs) and single/multiple organs were involved. Backward elimination was applied (p < 0.2) to identify postoperative recurrence predictors and obtained hazard ratios (HRs) based on Fine and Gray's model.

Postoperative recurrence was experienced by 31 patients (14.8%) at one or more of the following sites: regional LNs (n = 18), non-regional LNs (n = 10), lung (n = 2); bone (n = 2), and liver, local recurrence, skin, pleura, pericardium, and other (n = 1 each). In four patients, the first recurrence developed in multiple organs. The median interval between trial registration and the first recurrence was 18.6 months. In multivariable analyses, pathologic nodal metastasis (hazard ratio [HR], 3.29; p = 0.003), tumor location in the upper-thoracic esophagus versus lower-thoracic esophagus (HR, 6.71; p = 0.013), and two-field lymphadenectomy (HR, 4.31; p = 0.001) were independently associated with the development of postoperative recurrence.

The main postoperative recurrence sites of cT1bN0M0 ESCC are the LNs, but recurrence in non-regional LNs or distant organs is also quite common, indicating the importance of post-surgery systemic follow-up evaluation.

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains a significant global health challenge, being the sixth leading cause of cancer mortality with pronounced geographic variability. The incidence rates range from 125 per 100,000 in northern China to 1-1.5 per 100,000 in the United States, driven by environmental and lifestyle factors such as tobacco and alcohol use, dietary habits, and pollution. Major modifiable risk factors include tobacco and alcohol consumption, with a synergistic risk increase when combined. Nonmodifiable risk factors include previous diagnoses of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (H&N SCC), achalasia, and prior radiotherapy. Prevention strategies must be tailored to specific regional burdens to efficiently allocate medical and financial resources. Gastrointestinal endoscopy is crucial in reducing ESCC burden through early detection and characterization of neoplastic changes, such as high-grade dysplasia. Early diagnosis significantly improves survival rates, while endoscopic resection of noninvasive dysplasia can prevent ESCC onset, reducing treatment burden for advanced disease. Postresection surveillance can detect high-risk metachronous lesions. Despite these benefits, endoscopic prevention faces challenges, including the lack of high-level evidence supporting its efficacy, opportunity costs, the need for specialized training and techniques, and the requirement for advanced technology investments. This Position Statement from the World Endoscopy Organization (WEO) aims to address these challenges, supplying recommendations for the exploitation of endoscopic resources regarding the possible role of screening, quality, and training for the detection, characterization, resection, and surveillance of ESCC.

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is often managed with surgery, which is the first-line treatment option for stage I-III lesions. However, definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) is associated with a recurrence rate of 30% in stage I ESCC and higher rates in advanced-staged lesions. However, several patients prefer dCRT because their general condition is poor. Salvage therapies, including esophagectomy and endoscopic resection [endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD)/endoscopic mucosal resection], are important for residual or recurrent tumors that develop after dCRT. Esophagectomy can have curative potential. However, it has high complication and mortality rates. Therefore, ESD is a safer alternative.

A Japanese man in his 70s was concurrently diagnosed with right hypopharyngeal cancer (T2N1M0, cStage III), left oropharyngeal cancer (T1N0M0, cStage I), and left hard palate cancer (T1N0M0, cStage I). Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) revealed a 20 mm reddish 0-Is+IIb lesion in the upper thoracic esophagus, with an invasion depth of SM2. The lesion was diagnosed as an esophageal moderately differentiated squamous cell carcinoma (T1bN0M0, cStage I). As the pharyngeal cancers were in advanced stages, chemoradiotherapy (docetaxel and cisplatin with a radiation dose of 66 Gy) was prioritized. Post-chemoradiotherapy EGD showed that the lesion had flattened into a 0-IIb lesion, thereby indicating a reduced invasion depth (epithelium or lamina propria mucosa). ESD achieved en bloc and histologically confirmed curative resection. At 22 months after ESD, the patient did not present with signs of recurrence.

This case emphasizes that ESD can be successfully utilized as a salvage treatment for ESCC after chemoradiotherapy for otolaryngological cancers.

Cervical esophageal cancer (CEC) is an uncommon malignancy accounting for <5% of all esophageal carcinomas. Treatment of CEC varies and is adapted from established regimens used for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) or the lower esophageal and head and neck. The present systematic review and guidelines are intended to assist treatment decision making for patients with CEC based on the available evidence.

Using the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, Timing, and Study Design (PICOTS) framework, the evidence regarding treatment outcomes was assessed using Cochrane and PRISMA 2020 methodology. Eligible studies included prospective Phase II to III trials and retrospective analyses published between January 1, 2013 and February 23, 2024 in the Ovid Medline database. These references were assessed through the American Radium Society (ARS) Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) methodology. A systematic review PRISMA 2020 checklist confirmed the completion of essential elements. RAND-UCLA consensus methodology was used by the expert panel to rate the appropriateness of the treatment options.

ARS AUC recommendations include (1) larynx preservation using endoscopic resection (EMR or ESD) alone for the typical case with pT1a cN0 cM0 CEC, (2) definitive CRT for the typical case with cT1bN0M0 in patients who cannot undergo endoscopic resection, (3) larynx-preserving using definitive CRT (with or without induction chemotherapy) for the typical case with nonmetastatic locally advanced CEC (advanced T-stage tumors or involved lymph nodes), with surgery reserved for those patients with incomplete response or locoregional recurrence.

This ARS AUC summary provides guidelines for the management of SCC of the cervical esophagus provides based on available evidence. Topics that warrant further investigation include optimization of (1) patient selection; (2) multimodality therapies including chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted agents; (3) radiation dose, schedule, and treatment volume; and (4) supportive care for patients with CEC. Ongoing trials continue to improve outcomes for patients with CEC.

Early detection of esophageal cancer is essential for esophagogastroduodenoscopy and histopathological diagnosis. However, endoscopic examinations are sometimes invasive, which limits their clinical application and compliance, and traditional blood tumor markers are unsuitable for cancer screening. The current study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of sulfur metabolites as new biomarkers for esophageal cancer using blood samples and exhaled breath condensate (EBC), which can be readily obtained and is non-invasive. We collected EBC and plasma samples from 50 patients with esophageal cancer and 30 healthy controls. Sulfur metabolome analysis using tandem mass spectrometry was performed to compare the metabolic profile between the two groups. Supersulfide metabolic profiles were different between the two cohorts. Supersulfide metabolome analysis showed that cysteine hydropersulfide (CysSSH) and homocysteine hydropersulfide (HomoCysSSH) were increased in the plasma of patients with esophageal cancer. Elevated levels of HomoCysSSH could distinguish patients with esophageal cancer from healthy subjects (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.93, sensitivity: 89%, specificity: 96%). Interestingly, we also detected an elevation of supersulfides in the EBC analysis. CysSSH levels significantly increased in the EBC recovered from patients with esophageal cancer (AUC: 0.71, sensitivity: 60%, specificity: 96%). In addition, the observed level was correlated with that of HomoCysSSH in the plasma (r = 0.27). Supersulfides, such as CysSSH and HomoCysSSH, are potential biomarkers for detecting esophageal cancer. CysSSH from EBC may serve as a valuable non-invasive biomarker with similar detection ability but with superior precision and convenience compared with the currently available blood biomarkers.

Esophageal cancer (EC) continues to be a significant global health concern, with two main subtypes: esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and esophageal adenocarcinoma. Prevention and changes in etiology, improvements in early detection, and refinements in the treatment have led to remarkable progress in the outcomes of EC patients in the past two decades. This seminar provides an in-depth analysis of advances in the epidemiology, disease biology, screening, diagnosis, and treatment landscape of esophageal cancer, focusing on the ongoing debate surrounding multimodality therapy. Despite significant advancements, EC remains a deadly disease, underscoring the need for continued research into early detection methods, understanding the molecular mechanisms, and developing effective treatments.

This study aims to investigate the regulatory mechanisms of METTL3, YTHDF1, and the long non-coding RNA FOXD2-AS1 in the proliferation and apoptosis of esophageal cancer, with the goal of providing a basis for molecular diagnosis and targeted therapies. Gene expression was evaluated using qRT-PCR (METTL3/14) and Western blot analysis. The Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) assay, flow cytometry, and Transwell assay were employed to assess cell proliferation and apoptosis. The EpiQuik m6A RNA Methylation Quantification Kit was utilized to quantify total m6A levels. The interaction between YTHDF1, FOXD2-AS1, and METTL3 was confirmed using RNA Binding Protein Immunoprecipitation (RIP), Co-Immunoprecipitation (CO-IP), and RNA pull-down assays. Methylated RNA Immuno preci pitation (MeRIP) was employed to assess the m6A modification levels of FOXD2-AS1. Tissue samples from animal models were analyzed via Hematoxylin-eosin staining (HE) staining and immunohisto-chemistry to assess METTL3 expression. The expression of METTL3 was up-regulated in esophageal cancer tissues and cells. Flow cytometry and CCK-8 detection showed that silencing METTL3 could inhibit the proliferation of esophageal cancer cells but accelerate their apoptosis. MeRIP-qPCR and Prediction of m6A-modified sites indicated that METTL3 regulated the m6A modification of FOXD2-AS1. In vitro and in vivo experiments showed that YTHDF1 binds to METTL3 and regulates the m6A modification of FOXD2-AS1 to affect esophageal cancer. Our results indicate that METTL3 regulates FOXD2-AS1 in an m6A-dependent manner through its interaction with YTHDF1, thereby influencing EC proliferation and apoptosis. This suggests a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of esophageal cancer.

Patients diagnosed with pathologic T1N0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and treated with surgery alone have a good prognosis and are generally followed up without adjuvant therapy. However, recurrence has been observed in this patient group. Therefore, this study aimed to identify recurrence and prognostic factors in patients with pathologic T1N0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who were treated with surgery alone.

Of the 532 patients who underwent esophagectomy with R0 resection at Hiroshima University Hospital between August 2003 and November 2018, 124 who underwent only esophagectomy and had pathological T1N0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma were included in the study. Recurrence and prognostic factors were analyzed and details of recurrence were evaluated.

The 5-year recurrence-free survival and 5-year overall survival rates were 84.7% and 87.2%, respectively. Recurrence was observed in 12 (9.7%) patients. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that the histologic type (poorly differentiated compared with others) and lymphatic and/or vascular invasion (positive compared with negative) were statistically significant for recurrence-free survival. Kaplan-Meier curves for recurrence-free survival and overall survival showed that prognosis was significantly stratified according to these factors. All patients with poorly differentiated and positive lymphatic and/or vascular invasion experienced recurrence and recurrence pattern is all distant metastases.

Poorly differentiated and lymphatic and/or vascular invasion are important recurrence and prognostic predictors in pathologic T1N0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with surgery alone. Patients with these prognostic factors experienced increased recurrence rates, often with distant metastasis. Therefore, adjuvant therapy may be beneficial for such patients and follow-ups should be performed at closer intervals.

We developed a robot-assisted transmediastinal esophagectomy (RATME) to reduce the surgical invasiveness of open transthoracic esophagectomy (oTTE). However, the long-term survival outcomes of patients who undergo RATME remain unclear. Patients who underwent RATME for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) between January 2012 and April 2020 were enrolled. Overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and ESCC cause-specific survival (CSS) were analyzed according to clinical stage. Survivals were compared between patients who underwent the RATME and oTTE using propensity score matching analysis. One hundred and twenty-seven patients who underwent RATME were included in the analysis. The 3- and 5-year OS rates were 96.2 and 92.1% for cStage I RATME group, 84.8 and 82.3% for cStage II, and 61.8 and 61.8% for cStage III, respectively. The 3- and 5-year RFS rates were 94.3 and 84.3% for cStageI, 71.7 and 69.3% for cStage II, and 5 48.2 and 48.2% for cStage III, respectively. Survival analysis using 74 paired patients showed that the RATME group had better OS and RFS than the oTTE group (p = 0.0028 and p = 0.016, respectively), but equivalent CSS (p = 0.078). The OS of the RATME group stratified by clinical stage was equivalent to that of the comprehensive registry data from Japan, and showed better OS and RFS than the oTTE group, indicating that RATME radicality is guaranteed with regard to long-term survival.

This study aimed to assess the viability of definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) as an organ-preservation strategy for remarkable responders who were downstaged to stage IA after receiving induction chemotherapy for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

Chemotherapy-naïve patients with resectable ESCC (stage IB-III, Union for International Cancer Control, International Cancer Control seventh edition) were eligible for the study. All patients received 3 cycles of docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-FU (DCF) therapy (docetaxel 75 mg/m2 on day 1, cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1, and 5-fluorouracil [5-FU] 750 mg/m2 on days 1-5, repeated every 3 weeks). Remarkable response was defined as a reduction in the tumor to T1, metastatic lymph nodes <1 cm on the short axis, and downstaging to stage IA after 3 cycles of DCF therapy. Remarkable responders then underwent dCRT, which included 2 courses of cisplatin 75 mg/m2 and 5-FU 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 to 4, repeated every 4 weeks, along with 50.4 Gy of concurrent radiation therapy. The primary endpoint was 1-year progression-free survival in remarkable responders following DCF therapy and subsequent dCRT. Secondary endpoints included 3-year overall survival (OS) and esophagectomy-free survival.

Of the 92 patients registered, 90 were analyzed. A remarkable response to 3 courses of DCF therapy was observed in 58.4% of patients. Among these responders, 89.8% achieved a complete response after dCRT. During the median follow-up period of 33 months (range, 1-85 months), the 1-year progression-free survival was 89.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 77.2%-95.6%, primary endpoint), and the 3-year OS was 83.7%. The 3-year OS and esophagectomy-free survival rates in the analysis group were 74.1% and 45.3%, respectively. An 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography response after 2 courses of DCF therapy was significantly associated with OS (P = .0049).

In patients with resectable ESCC, dCRT for remarkable responders downstaging to stage IA after induction chemotherapy with 3 courses of DCF therapy is a feasible treatment option and provides an optimizing organ-preservation strategy of chemotherapy-based selection.

Several studies have shown that the survival outcomes of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) are not inferior to surgery alone in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). This study aimed to compare survival outcomes of ESCC treated with immunochemotherapy (ICT) followed by surgery or definitive CRT and to explore subgroups of patients who could benefit from one treatment strategy.

Pooled data were obtained from two prospectively registered clinical trials of patients with ESCC at the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. One trial involved treatment with neoadjuvant ICT followed by surgery, while the other involved induction ICT followed by definitive CRT. To balance potential biases, we conducted an overlap weighting (OW) analysis to compare the rates of 2-year progression-free survival (PFS), locoregional relapse-free survival (LRRFS), distant relapse-free survival (DRFS), and overall survival (OS). Additionally, propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to analyze failure pattern.

The median follow-up time of the survivors was 39.3 months. After overlap weighting, the rates of 2-year PFS, LRRFS, DRFS, and OS for patients undergoing surgery and CRT were 61.5 % and 59.7 %, 67.2 % and 69.9 %, 81.3 % and 90.7 %, 84.6 % and 79.1 %, respectively (P>.05 for all). A trend for improved 2-year OS was observed in the surgery group in patients who did not respond to ICT (P=.07).

The differences in the rates of 2-year PFS, LRRFS, DRFS, and OS between the surgery group and the chemoradiotherapy group did not reach statistical significance.

The objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of radiotherapy and the prognostic factors in patients with esophageal cancer who received definitive radiotherapy, using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT).

Forty-seven patients who received definitive radiotherapy using VMAT between September 2017 and December 2020 were enrolled. Prescription doses were 60 Gy in 30 fractions to the planning target volume (PTV) primary and 48 Gy in 30 fractions to the PTV subclinical. Overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and toxicity were analyzed, and univariate and multivariate analyses were used to investigate the prognostic factors.

Median follow up time was 10 months. Most of the patients had an advanced disease stage (stage I, 12.8%; II, 8.5%; III, 27.7%; IV, 51.0%) patients (38.3%) had a T4 tumor. The median survival time was 14 months (range: 0-56 months). The 2-year OS and PFS were 31.3% and 20.4%, respectively. Acute adverse events (≥ Grade 3) were observed in 25 patients (53.2%), and the most frequent types were dysphagia, hematological toxicities including leukopenia, and febrile neutropenia in 14 (29.8%), 10 (21%), and 10 (21%) patients, respectively. Late adverse events (Grade 3 or higher) were observed in eight patients (17.0%), and the most frequent types were pneumonitis in four patients (8.5%), and Grade 5 in one patient (2.1%; esophageal fistula). In multivariate analysis, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) > 3 (p = 0.026) was significantly associated with poor survival.

Definitive radiotherapy of 60Gy with VMAT is feasible and safe for patients with esophageal cancer. Pre-treatment NLR >3 was an independent prognostic factor for OS.

A recent phase I/II study determined the optimal dose of definitive carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) for cT1bN0M0 esophageal cancer. This study aimed to further confirm the efficacy and feasibility of the recommended dose fractionation of CIRT with long-term follow-up results in a larger sample size.

This single center retrospective study evaluated patients with cT1bN0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with the recommended dose fractionation of 50.4 Gy relative biological effectiveness in 12 fractions, between 2012 and 2022.

Thirty-eight patients underwent CIRT at our hospital. Although eight (21.1%) patients were older than 80 years, 15 (39.5%) had high surgical risk, and seven (18.4%) were at high risk for chemotherapy, all patients underwent CIRT as scheduled. Grade 3 esophagitis occurred in eight (21.1%) patients and grade 3 pneumonia in one (2.6%) patient in this study, but no grade 4 adverse events occurred. The only grade 3 late adverse event was pneumonia in one patient (2.6%). The 5-year overall survival rate, local control rate, and disease-free survival rates were 76.6% (95% CI, 90.9-62.4), 74.9% (95% CI, 90.7-59.0), and 66.4% (95% CI, 83.3-49.5), respectively. Additionally, post CIRT recurrence was as follows: seven (18.4%) patients had recurrence in another part of the esophagus, three (7.9%) in the primary site, three (7.9%) in lymph nodes outside the irradiated area, and one (2.6%) patient had liver metastasis.

Our study demonstrates that CIRT using the recommended dose fractionation is feasible and effective for cT1bN0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Aim: Treatment options for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma includes surgery and chemoradiotherapy (CRT), however there was limited information about the factors influenced in patients' decision-making.Materials & methods: Patients who participated in JCOG0502, a parallel group controlled trial comparing surgery with CRT, were analyzed for the factors related to decision-making.Results: Of the 368 patients (pts) enrolled in the nonrandomized part in JCOG0502, 209 pts opted for surgery and 159 pts chose CRT on their own. Background characteristics were the same except for age. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that age ≥65 years, male sex, multiple lesions, absence of children and doctor's thinking were associated with the selection of CRT.Conclusion: The doctor's option was the most influential factor in the patient's decision-making process.Clinical Trial Registration: UMIN000000551 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by surgery remains a standard of care for resectable esophageal cancer (EC), and definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) is an alternative for unresectable diseases. However, it is controversial for the use of the two aggressive regimens in elderly patients.

We systematically searched multiple databases for studies comparing overall survival (OS) and/or progression-free survival (PFS) between dCRT and surgery (nCRT + surgery or surgery alone) or between dCRT and radiotherapy (RT) alone in elderly patients (age ≥ 65 years) until March 28, 2024. Statistical analysis was performed using random-effects model.

Fourty-five studies with 33,729 patients were included. dCRT significantly prolonged OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.64, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.58-0.70) and PFS (HR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.60-0.76) compared to RT alone for unresectable EC, and resulted in a worse OS compared to surgery for resectable cases (HR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.23-1.45). Similar results of OS were also observed when the multivariate-adjusted HRs were used as the measure of effect (dCRT vs. RT alone: HR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.58-0.73; dCRT vs. surgery: HR = 1.49, 95% CI: 1.28-1.74). Subgroup analyses according to age group (≥ 70, ≥ 75, or ≥ 80 years), study design, study region, histological type, radiation field, chemotherapy regimen revealed comparable results.

nCRT + surgery is likely a preferred strategy for elderly patients with good physiological conditions; and dCRT is a better alternative for unresectable cases. Advanced age alone does not appear to be a key predictor for the tolerability of the two aggressive treatments.

Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) modulates the tumor immune microenvironment of multiple cancer types, including esophageal cancer, which potentially induces both immunogenicity and immunosuppression by upregulating the presentation of tumor-specific antigens and immune checkpoint molecules in tumors, respectively. The prognostic effects of immune modification by CRT in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remain controversial because of the lack of detailed immunological analyses using paired clinical specimens before and after CRT. We aimed to clarify the immunological changes in the tumor microenvironment caused by CRT and elucidate the predictive importance of clinical response and prognosis and the rationale for the necessity of subsequent programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor treatment.

In this study, we performed a comprehensive immunological analysis of paired biopsy specimens using multiplex immunohistochemistry before and after CRT in patients with unresectable locally advanced ESCC.

CRT significantly increased the intra-tumoral infiltration and PD-1 expression of CD8+ T cells and conventional CD4+ T cells but decreased those of regulatory T cells and the accumulation of tumor-associated macrophages. Multivariate analysis of tumor-infiltrating T-cell phenotypes revealed that the density of PD-1+CD8+ T cells in the tumor after CRT could predict a confirmed complete response and favorable survival.

This study showed that CRT improved the immunological characteristics of unresectable locally advanced ESCC and identified the density of PD-1+CD8+ T cells as a predictive factor for prognosis. This finding supports the rationale for the necessity of subsequent PD-1 inhibitor treatment.

The literature pertaining to surveillance following treatment for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) was reviewed and summarized, encompassing the current status and future perspectives. Analysis of the standardized mortality and incidence ratios for these cancers indicates an elevated risk of cancer in the oral cavity, pharynx, larynx, and lungs among patients with esophageal SCC compared to the general population. To enhance the efficacy of surveillance for these metachronous cancers, risk stratification is needed. Various factors, including multiple Lugol-voiding lesions, multiple foci of dilated vascular areas, young age, and high mean corpuscular volume, have been identified as predictors of metachronous SCCs. Current practice involves stratifying the risk of metachronous esophageal and head/neck SCCs based on the presence of multiple Lugol-voiding lesions. Endoscopic surveillance, scheduled 6-12 months post-endoscopic resection, has demonstrated effectiveness, with over 90% of metachronous esophageal SCCs treatable through minimally invasive modalities. Narrow-band imaging emerges as the preferred surveillance method for esophageal and head/neck SCC based on comparative studies of various imaging techniques. Innovative approaches, such as artificial intelligence-assisted detection systems and radiofrequency ablation of high-risk background mucosa, may improve outcomes in patients following endoscopic resection.

This editorial comments on an article by Qu et al published in the World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology. It focuses on the importance of early detection of esophageal cancer, including recurrence or secondary malignancy after chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Endoscopic resection is the first choice for treatment for esophageal cancer remaining within the mucous membrane, while surgery or radical CRT are treatment options for advanced stages depending on the patient's general condition and desire. Although these treatments are potentially curative, they are more invasive than endoscopic resection. Early-stage esophageal cancer is often asymptomatic and difficult to detect. Uniform periodic endoscopy is unrealistic. Although less burdensome tests exist, including liquid biopsy and urinary biomarkers, these have not yet been widely used in clinical practice. Early detection is important after radical CRT because the local recurrence rate is higher than that after surgery. However, endoscopic resection or photodynamic therapy is indicated if detected in the early stages, and positive results have been reported. Early detection of esophageal cancer is crucial. Endoscopy is the main diagnostic method; however, new and less burdensome methods should be established to ensure early treatment for patients with esophageal cancer.

Given increased utilization of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for gastric adenocarcinoma, practice patterns deviating from standard of care (upfront resection) remain unknown. We sought to identify factors associated with NAT use and survival outcomes among early-stage gastric cancers.

The National Cancer Database identified patients with early-stage (T1N0M0) gastric cancer (2010-2020). Multivariable logistic regression assessed characteristics associated with NAT utilization compared to upfront surgery. After 1:1 propensity score matching, Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox regression assessed overall survival (OS).

Of 6452 patients with early-stage gastric cancer, 626 (9.7%) received NAT. Patients who received NAT were more likely treated at community hospitals, had moderate to poorly differentiated disease, and tumors located in the cardia (all p < 0.05). After propensity score matching, 1,248 patients remained. Median OS for NAT was 37.1 months (IQR 20.2-64.0) versus 45.6 months (IQR 22.5-72.8) for resection (p < 0.001). Treatment with NAT remained independently predictive of worse OS on Cox regression (hazard ratio 1.19; 95% confidence interval 1.05-1.34).

Although patients who received NAT had more aggressive prognostic features, NAT was associated with worse OS despite accounting for this selection bias. These results highlight the importance of adhering to guidelines, regardless of differing disease characteristics, which has significant implications on outcomes.

An optimal radiotherapy field for superficial esophageal carcinoma is yet to be established. We evaluated the long-term outcomes and recurrence patterns of involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT) in older patients with superficial thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

Fifty-four patients (49 men and 5 women; mean age, 77 [range: 66-90] years) who underwent IFRT for superficial thoracic ESCC between January 2003 and January 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Concurrent chemotherapy was administered at the discretion of the attending physician. The primary endpoint was overall survival. The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival and complete response rate.

The tumors were localized in the upper, middle, and lower thoracic esophagus in 2, 40, and 12 patients, respectively. All patients underwent IFRT using anteroposterior and anterior-posterior oblique opposed beams (off-cord). The prescribed total doses were 50.4, 59.4-61.2, and 66-70 Gy for 6, 40, and 8 patients, respectively. Concurrent chemotherapy was administered to 33 patients. The median follow-up duration was 57 months. The median overall survival was 115 months. The 5-year overall and progression-free survival rates were 71.7% and 60.1%, respectively. Forty-nine patients had a complete response at one month after IFRT (complete response rate: 90.7%). Twenty patients had recurrence; there were 13 in-field and 7 out-of-field recurrence cases. The radiation-related adverse events were generally mild. Grade 3 late toxicity was observed in one patient.

The efficacy of IFRT was suggested to be comparable to that of standard treatments. Therefore, IFRT can be a promising approach for treating superficial ESCC in older adults, especially those with severe comorbidities.

In older patients, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is difficult to treat using standard therapies, including surgery and cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy. Paclitaxel (PTX) has radiosensitizing activity. We conducted a phase I trial of PTX combined with radiotherapy to establish a standard therapy for locally advanced ESCC in older patients.

Enrollment was conducted at six centers in Japan from April 2016 to September 2019. The participants were aged ≥ 70 years, had locally advanced ESCC, and were intolerant to surgery or unwilling. A fixed 60-Gy radiation dose was administered in 30 fractions. PTX dosing levels started at 30 mg/m2 weekly for 6 weeks. Depending on the number of DLTs, the dose was set to be increased by 10 mg/m2 or switched to biweekly. A geriatric assessment was performed before treatment using the Geriatric-8 screening tool. The primary endpoint was dose-limiting toxicity (DLT).

We enrolled 24 patients (6 per group); DLT was observed in one (grade 4 hypokalemia), one (grade 3 aspiration), two (grade 3 radiodermatitis, grade 3 esophageal hemorrhage), and two (grade 3 anorexia, grade 5 pneumonitis) patients in the weekly PTX 30, 40, 50, and 60 mg/m2 groups, respectively. All adverse events, except death in the 60 mg/m2 group, showed reversible improvement, and the safety profile was considered acceptable. The 2-year survival and complete response rates were 40.0% and 54.2%, respectively. There was a significant difference in survival between favorable and unfavorable Geriatric-8 scores.

The recommended PTX dose with concomitant radiation was determined to be 50 mg/m2 weekly. Phase II trials at this dose are underway.

Approximately 90% of esophageal cancers in Japan are squamous cell carcinomas, and they are often detected at earlier stages in Japan than in Western countries; superficial esophageal cancer without lymph node or distant metastasis comprises one-third of all esophageal cancers in Japan. Endoscopic resection is a minimally invasive treatment for superficial esophageal cancer; however, the risk of regional lymph node recurrence is negligible when it invades the submucosal layer or lymphovasculature. In such cases, surgical treatment is necessary to control regional lymph node recurrences, although the physical burdens and potential complications cannot be overlooked. Recently, clinical trials in Japan have shown promising clinical outcomes of organ preservation strategies. One strategy is initially performing endoscopic resection for superficial esophageal cancer, assessing the risk of lymph node metastasis based on pathological diagnosis for endoscopically resected specimens, and subsequently considering additional therapy (e.g., observation or prophylactic chemoradiotherapy)-another strategy aimed to cure superficial esophageal cancer through definitive chemoradiotherapy alone. The safety and efficacy of the two strategies have been evaluated in clinical trials, which showed that both organ preservation strategies are comparable to surgery in terms of overall survival. However, challenges include improving the accuracy of pretreatment endoscopic diagnosis and decreasing the local-regional recurrence after chemoradiotherapy. This review provides an overview of the latest standard treatment for early-stage esophageal cancer and its future perspectives.

With one of the highest mortality rates of all malignancies, the 5-year survival rate for esophageal cancer is under 20%. Depending on the stage and extent of the disease, the current standard of care treatment paradigm includes chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy followed by surgical esophagogastrectomy, with consideration for adjuvant immunotherapy for residual disease. This regimen has high morbidity, due to anatomic changes inherent in surgery, the acuity of surgical complications, and off-target effects of systemic chemotherapy and immunotherapy. We begin with a review of current treatments, then discuss new and emerging targets for therapies and advanced drug delivery systems. Recent and ongoing preclinical and early clinical studies are evaluating traditional tumor targets (e.g., human epidermal growth factor receptor 2), as well as promising new targets such as Yes-associated protein 1 or mammalian target of rapamycin to develop new treatments for this disease. Due the function and location of the esophagus, opportunities also exist to pair these treatments with a drug delivery strategy to increase tumor targeting, bioavailability, and intratumor concentrations, with the two most common delivery platforms being stents and nanoparticles. Finally, early results with antibody drug conjugates and chimeric antigenic receptor T cells show promise as upcoming therapies. This review discusses these innovations in therapeutics and drug delivery in the context of their successes and failures, with the goal of identifying those solutions that demonstrate the most promise to shift the paradigm in treating this deadly disease.

The development of sarcopenia after esophagectomy is reported to affect the outcomes of patients with esophageal cancer (EC); however, the characteristics of patients likely to be predisposed to postoperative sarcopenia have not been defined. This study explores the associations between preoperative respiratory function and surgery-induced sarcopenia in EC patients confirmed as nonsarcopenic preoperatively.

The subjects of this retrospective review were 128 nonsarcopenic patients who underwent esophagectomy for EC. We took body composition measurements and performed physical function tests 3 and 6 months postoperatively, to establish whether sarcopenia was present, according to the 2019 Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia guideline. We defined patients with surgery-induced sarcopenia as those with evidence of the development of sarcopenia within 6 months postoperatively or those with documented sarcopenia at 3 months but who could not be evaluated at 6 months.

Surgery-induced sarcopenia developed in 19 of the 128 patients (14.8%), which correlated significantly with the preoperative %VC value (p < 0.01), but not with the preoperative FEV1.0% value. We set the lower quartile %VC value (91%) as the cut-off for predicting surgery-induced sarcopenia. A low %VC was independently associated with surgery-induced sarcopenia (odds ratio: 5.74; 95% confidence interval: 1.99-16.57; p < 0.01).

Based on the findings of this study, %VC was a simple but valuable factor for predicting sarcopenia induced by esophagectomy.

Pancreatoduodenectomy and subtotal esophagectomy are widely considered the most invasive and difficult surgical procedures in gastrointestinal surgery. Subtotal esophagectomy after pancreatoduodenectomy is expected to be extremely difficult due to complicated anatomical changes, and selecting an appropriate intestinal reconstruction method will also be a difficult task. Therefore, perhaps because the method is considered impossible, there have been few reports of subtotal esophagectomy after pancreatoduodenectomy.

A 73-year-old man with a history of pancreatoduodenectomy was diagnosed with superficial thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Definitive chemoradiation therapy was recommended at another hospital; however, he visited our department to undergo surgery. We performed the robot-assisted thoracoscopic subtotal esophagectomy. There were some difficulties with the reconstruction: the gastric tube could not be used, the reconstruction was long, and the organs reconstructed in the previous surgery had to be preserved. However, the concurrent reconstruction was achieved with the help of a free jejunal flap and vascular reconstruction. All reconstructions from the previous surgery, including the remnant stomach, were preserved via regional abdominal lymph node dissection. After reconstruction, intravenous indocyanine green showed that circulation in the reconstructed intestines was preserved. On postoperative day 1, no recurrent nerve paralysis was observed during laryngoscopy. The patient could start oral intake smoothly 2 weeks after surgery and did not exhibit any postoperative complications related to the reconstruction. The patient was transferred to another hospital on postoperative day 21.

Owing to the free jejunal flap interposition method, we safely performed one stage subtotal esophagectomy and concurrent reconstruction, preservation of the remnant stomach, and pancreaticobiliary reconstruction in patients with a history of pancreatoduodenectomy. We believe that this method is acceptable and useful for patients undergoing complicated reconstruction.

Oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma is a common malignancy worldwide. Definitive chemoradiotherapy is the standard treatment for patients with resectable stage oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma who cannot undergo surgery, as well as those with locally advanced unresectable oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. However, it has several disadvantages such as poor survival, radiation-related toxicities and severe and lethal complications related to salvage treatment for residual or recurrent disease. Numerous clinical trials on chemoradiotherapy have been conducted to confirm the optimal combination of irradiation and chemotherapy. For advanced disease, multimodal treatment strategies including salvage surgery are essential. Palliative chemoradiotherapy is also crucial for dysphagia in locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma with or without metastatic lesions. Recently, the synergistic mechanism of radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy has been reported. Early phase clinical trials suggest that a combination of immunotherapy and chemoradiotherapy can improve clinical outcomes with manageable side effects, but further investigations are needed. Here, we reviewed the existing clinical data and current development of chemoradiotherapy combined with immunotherapy in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

The present study investigated the factors contributing to cardiac volume reduction (CVR) during radiotherapy (RT) in patients with esophageal carcinoma (EC). This retrospective study included patients with EC treated at National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center (Matsuyama, Japan). Cardiac delineation was based on initial and off-cord boost (spinal cord-sparing approach) planning computed tomography images. The relationship between CVR and other relevant parameters was analyzed. A total of 58 patients with EC were investigated between January 2016 and January 2022. Univariate and multiple regression analyses revealed a statistically significant association between CVR during RT and the change ratio of the inferior vena cava (IVC) volume and body mass index (BMI) loss. In multivariate analysis of CVR of >10%, only the change in IVC volume exhibited a significant association. Conversely, CVR during RT displayed no association with heart dose-volume parameters, laboratory data, or changes in blood pressure and pulse rate. Among the 12 cases with CVR of >10%, the median movement of the left anterior descending coronary artery region (LADR) was 1.35 cm (range, 0.0-2.7 cm). In conclusion, CVR during RT was most strongly associated with changes in IVC volume, suggesting dehydration as the primary cause, rather than radiation-induced heart damage. LADR movement due to a CVR of >10% may lead to LADR radiation overdose.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and surgical resection are the standard of care for cT1N0M0 esophageal cancer (EC), whereas definitive chemoradiotherapy (d-CRT) is a treatment option. Nevertheless, the comparative efficiency and safety of ESD, surgery and d-CRT for cT1N0M0 EC remain unclear.

To compare the efficiency and safety of ESD, surgery and d-CRT for cT1N0M0 EC.

We retrospectively analyzed the hospitalized data of a total of 472 consecutive patients with cT1N0M0 EC treated at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer center between 2017-2019 and followed up until October 30th, 2022. We analyzed demographic, medical recorded, histopathologic characteristics, imaging and endoscopic, and follow-up data. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards modeling were used to analyze the difference of survival outcome by treatments. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to minimize potential confounding factors.

We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent ESD (n = 99) or surgery (n = 220) or d-CRT (n = 16) at the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from 2017 to 2019. The median follow-up time for the ESD group, the surgery group, and the d-CRT group was 42.0 mo (95%CI: 35.0-60.2), 45.0 mo (95%CI: 34.0-61.75) and 32.5 mo (95%CI: 28.3-40.0), respectively. After adjusting for background factors using IPTW, the highest 3-year overall survival (OS) rate and 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate were observed in the ESD group (3-year OS: 99.7% and 94.7% and 79.1%; and 3-year RFS: 98.3%, 87.4% and 79.1%, in the ESD, surgical, and d-CRT groups, respectively). There was no difference of severe complications occurring between the three groups (P ≥ 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that treatment method, histology and depth of infiltration were independently associated with OS and RFS.

For cT1N0M0 EC, ESD had better long-term survival and lower hospitalization costs than those who underwent d-CRT and surgery, with a similar rate of severe complications occurring.

Chemoradiotherapy has been considered as one of the standard treatment options for clinical T1bN0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with organ preservation. However, 20% of patients develop locoregional recurrence after chemoradiotherapy, which requires salvage treatment including salvage surgery and endoscopic resection. Salvage surgery can cause complications and treatment-related death. Interestingly, chemoradiotherapy with elective nodal irradiation has been reported to reduce the locoregional recurrence of advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Hence, we are conducting a clinical trial to confirm whether modified chemoradiotherapy with elective nodal irradiation was superiority to that without elective nodal irradiation for the patients with cT1bN0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. The primary endpoint is major progression-free survival, defined as the time from randomization to the date of death or disease progression, excluding successful curative resection through salvage endoscopic resection. We plan to enroll 280 patients from 54 institutions over 4 years. This trial has been registered in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs031200067).

To report the feasibility of hypofractionated radiation therapy (RT) alone for early stage esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients.

The oncologic outcomes of 60 cT1-2 N0 ESCC patients who received hypofractionated RT (54 ∼ 60 Gy by 3.0 Gy per fraction) from 2004 to 2018 were retrospectively evaluated.

The 5-year rates of local control (LC), progression-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival were 81.1 %, 44.2 %, 73.7 %, and 54.5 %, respectively. In Cox regression analysis, tumor length < 3 cm was correlated with favorable LC (HR 0.167, p = 0.090), and the 5-year LC rates were 95.7 % and 72.0 % in < 3 cm and ≥ 3 cm subgroups, respectively (p = 0.053). Grade ≥ 2 esophagitis was observed in 44 patients (73.3 %) and grade ≥ 2 esophageal strictures developed in five (8.3 %), respectively. The patients with ≥ 3 cm tumor more frequently suffered from grade ≥ 2 esophagitis (13/24 vs. 31/36, p = 0.006) and grade ≥ 2 esophageal stricture (0/24 vs. 5/36, p = 0.056), respectively. The patients with cT2 tumor suffered from grade ≥ 2 esophagitis more frequently than those with T1 tumor (29/44 vs. 15/16, p = 0.03).

Hypofractionated RT alone, with the merit of short treatment course, could be used as feasible option in treating the early stage ESCC patients who are unfit for surgical resection or chemoradiation. Especially, tumor length < 3 cm seems a good indication of this treatment scheme based on favorable LC rate with low incidence of esophageal toxicities.

To assess the failure pattern and analyze the treatment scheme of definitive radiation therapy (RT) for T1N0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

We performed a multi-institutional retrospective analysis in T1N0M0 ESCC patients who underwent definitive RT from 2010 to 2019. Patterns of failure were demonstrated as in-, and out-field locoregional, and distant metastasis. In the analysis, freedom-from locoregional recurrence (FFLRR) and their association with clinicopathologic factors were evaluated. Propensity score matching in cT1b patients was done.

168 patients were included with a median follow-up of 34.0 months, and 26 cT1a, 116 cT1b disease. The rates of 3-year all and locoregional recurrence for cT1a were 30.5% and 24.1% and those for cT1b were 27.1% and 25.9%, respectively. Among 116 cT1b patients, 69 patients received elective nodal irradiation (ENI) and 47 received involved field irradiation (IFI). After propensity score matching, the 3-year FFLRR rate was 84.5%. There was no difference between ENI and IFI in FFLRR (P = 0.831) and OS (P = 0.525). The 3-year FFLRR was 83.8% (95% Confidence interval (CI), 61.8-93.8%) in IFI group and 85.3% (95% CI, 65.1-94.3%) in ENI group. In multivariate analysis, concurrent chemotherapy use was marginally associated with FFLRR (Hazard ratio, 0.16; P = 0.064).

cT1a patients who cannot receive endoscopic resection showed similar failure rates as cT1b patients, questioning the staging accuracy and raised the need for thorough treatment like chemoradiotherapy. In cT1b patients, IFI with 50 to 60 Gy and concurrent chemotherapy could be reasonable.

This document is a summary of the French intergroup guidelines regarding the management of esophageal cancer (EC) published in July 2022, available on the website of the French Society of Gastroenterology (SNFGE) (www.tncd.org).

This collaborative work was conducted under the auspices of several French medical and surgical societies involved in the management of EC. Recommendations were graded in three categories (A, B and C), according to the level of evidence found in the literature until April 2022.

EC diagnosis and staging evaluation are mainly based on patient's general condition assessment, endoscopy plus biopsies, TAP CT-scan and 18F FDG-PET. Surgery alone is recommended for early-stage EC, while locally advanced disease (N+ and/or T3-4) is treated with perioperative chemotherapy (FLOT) or preoperative chemoradiation (CROSS regimen) followed by immunotherapy for adenocarcinoma. Preoperative chemoradiation (CROSS regimen) followed by immunotherapy or definitive chemoradiation with the possibility of organ preservation are the two options for squamous cell carcinoma. Salvage surgery is recommended for incomplete response or recurrence after definitive chemoradiation and should be performed in an expert center. Treatment for metastatic disease is based on systemic therapy including chemotherapy, immunotherapy or combined targeted therapy according to biomarkers testing such as HER2 status, MMR status and PD-L1 expression.

These guidelines are intended to provide a personalised therapeutic strategy for daily clinical practice and are subject to ongoing optimization. Each individual case should be discussed by a multidisciplinary team.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic had adversely impacted cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment. We investigated the change in medical resource, such as the intensive care unit use, and short-term outcomes after esophagectomy during the pandemic.

Data of patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer registered in the National Clinical Database (NCD) in Japan from January 2018 to December 2021 were analyzed. The time series change in the number of surgical cases; usage of intensive care unit; incidence of morbidity and mortality; standardized mortality and morbidity ratio (SMR) for 30-days mortality; surgical mortality; and morbidities for pneumonia, sepsis, unplanned intubation, and anastomotic leakage were evaluated.

The annual number of patients undergoing esophagectomy remained similar from 2018 to 2021. The negative impact of the pandemic on medical resources was strongly identified in the patients from an epidemic area where there is a higher cumulative number of infections per population as compared to all prefectures. The proportions of patients admitted to the intensive care unit were 91.4%, 93.0%, 91.6%, and 90.5% in 2018, 2019, 2020, and 2021, respectively. Moreover, 93.3%, 94.0%, 92.0%, and 90.9% patients who underwent surgery in an epidemic area were admitted to the intensive care unit in 2018, 2019, 2020, and 2021, respectively. However, the morbidity and mortality rates during the pandemic did not worsen according to the SMR values.

Esophagectomy was performed during the pandemic despite limited medical resources by a systematic endeavor of the entire surgical department in Japan, without increasing the incidence rate of worse outcome.