|
1
|
Rezaie A, Yeo YH. Reply. Gastroenterology 2025; 168:185-186. [PMID: 39251164 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2024.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2024] [Accepted: 09/04/2024] [Indexed: 09/11/2024]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yee Hui Yeo
- Karsh Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Edwardson N, van der Goes D, Pankratz VS, Parasher G, Adsul P, English K, Sheche J, Mishra SI. Trends in and factors associated with family physician-performed screening colonoscopies in the United States: 2016-2021. J Rural Health 2025; 41:e12858. [PMID: 38932468 PMCID: PMC11635341 DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Revised: 05/22/2024] [Accepted: 06/06/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Family physician (FP)-performed screening colonoscopies can serve as 1 strategy in the multifaceted strategy necessary to improve national colorectal cancer screening rates, particularly in rural areas where specialist models can fail. However, little research exists on the performance of this strategy in the real world. In this study, we evaluated trends in and factors associated with FP-performed screening colonoscopies in the United States between 2016 and 2021. METHODS Using national data from Merative's Marketscan insurance claims database, we estimate the proportion of screening colonoscopies performed by FPs. We use logistic regression models to evaluate factors independently associated with FP-performed colonoscopies. RESULTS The percentage of screening colonoscopies performed by FPs exhibited a downward trend from 11.32% in 2016 to 6.73% in 2021, with the largest decrease occurring among patients from the most rural areas. FPs were more likely to perform colonoscopies on slightly older patients, male patients, and rural patients. Patients were less likely to receive FP-performed colonoscopies in large metropolitan areas compared to lesser populated areas. Patients were more likely to receive FP-performed colonoscopies in the Midwest, South, and West, even after accounting for urban-rural classification. CONCLUSION Despite a downward trajectory, FPs perform a substantial proportion of screening colonoscopies in the United States. Changes to the business side of health care delivery may be contributing to the observed decreasing rate. Whether through spatial or relational proximity, FPs may be better positioned to provide colonoscopy to some rural, male, and older patients who otherwise may not have been screened. Policy changes to expand the FP workforce, particularly in rural areas, are likely necessary to slow or reverse the downward trend of FP-performed screening colonoscopies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Edwardson
- School of Public AdministrationUniversity of New MexicoAlbuquerqueNew MexicoUSA
- College of Population HealthUniversity of New Mexico Health Sciences CenterAlbuquerqueNew MexicoUSA
| | | | - V. Shane Pankratz
- Department of Internal MedicineUniversity of New Mexico Health Sciences CenterAlbuquerqueNew MexicoUSA
- University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer CenterAlbuquerqueNew MexicoUSA
| | - Gulshan Parasher
- Department of Internal MedicineUniversity of New Mexico Health Sciences CenterAlbuquerqueNew MexicoUSA
| | - Prajakta Adsul
- Department of Internal MedicineUniversity of New Mexico Health Sciences CenterAlbuquerqueNew MexicoUSA
- University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer CenterAlbuquerqueNew MexicoUSA
| | - Kevin English
- Albuquerque Area Southwest Tribal Epidemiology CenterAlbuquerque Area Indian Health Board, Inc.AlbuquerqueNew MexicoUSA
| | - Judith Sheche
- University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer CenterAlbuquerqueNew MexicoUSA
| | - Shiraz I. Mishra
- University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer CenterAlbuquerqueNew MexicoUSA
- Departments of Pediatrics and Family and Community MedicineUniversity of New Mexico Health Sciences CenterAlbuquerqueNew MexicoUSA
| |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Rubenstein JH, Fontaine S, MacDonald PW, Burns JA, Evans RR, Arasim ME, Chang JW, Firsht EM, Hawley ST, Saini SD, Wallner LP, Zhu J, Waljee AK. Predicting Incident Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus or Gastric Cardia Using Machine Learning of Electronic Health Records. Gastroenterology 2023; 165:1420-1429.e10. [PMID: 37597631 PMCID: PMC11013733 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Revised: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 08/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Tools that can automatically predict incident esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and gastric cardia adenocarcinoma (GCA) using electronic health records to guide screening decisions are needed. METHODS The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Corporate Data Warehouse was accessed to identify Veterans with 1 or more encounters between 2005 and 2018. Patients diagnosed with EAC (n = 8430) or GCA (n = 2965) were identified in the VHA Central Cancer Registry and compared with 10,256,887 controls. Predictors included demographic characteristics, prescriptions, laboratory results, and diagnoses between 1 and 5 years before the index date. The Kettles Esophageal and Cardia Adenocarcinoma predictioN (K-ECAN) tool was developed and internally validated using simple random sampling imputation and extreme gradient boosting, a machine learning method. Training was performed in 50% of the data, preliminary validation in 25% of the data, and final testing in 25% of the data. RESULTS K-ECAN was well-calibrated and had better discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AuROC], 0.77) than previously validated models, such as the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study (AuROC, 0.68) and Kunzmann model (AuROC, 0.64), or published guidelines. Using only data from between 3 and 5 years before index diminished its accuracy slightly (AuROC, 0.75). Undersampling men to simulate a non-VHA population, AUCs of the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study and Kunzmann model improved, but K-ECAN was still the most accurate (AuROC, 0.85). Although gastroesophageal reflux disease was strongly associated with EAC, it contributed only a small proportion of gain in information for prediction. CONCLUSIONS K-ECAN is a novel, internally validated tool predicting incident EAC and GCA using electronic health records data. Further work is needed to validate K-ECAN outside VHA and to assess how best to implement it within electronic health records.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joel H Rubenstein
- Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, Lieutenant Colonel Charles S. Kettles Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
| | - Simon Fontaine
- Department of Statistics, University of Michigan College of Literature, Science, and Arts, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Peter W MacDonald
- Department of Statistics, University of Michigan College of Literature, Science, and Arts, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Jennifer A Burns
- Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, Lieutenant Colonel Charles S. Kettles Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Richard R Evans
- Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, Lieutenant Colonel Charles S. Kettles Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Maria E Arasim
- Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, Lieutenant Colonel Charles S. Kettles Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Joy W Chang
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Elizabeth M Firsht
- Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, Lieutenant Colonel Charles S. Kettles Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Sarah T Hawley
- Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, Lieutenant Colonel Charles S. Kettles Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Sameer D Saini
- Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, Lieutenant Colonel Charles S. Kettles Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Lauren P Wallner
- Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Ji Zhu
- Department of Statistics, University of Michigan College of Literature, Science, and Arts, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Akbar K Waljee
- Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, Lieutenant Colonel Charles S. Kettles Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
|
4
|
Rex DK, Ladabaum U, Anderson JC, Shaukat A, Butterly LF, Dominitz JA, Kaltenbach T, Levin TR, Hassan C. Does Screening Colonoscopy Have a Future in the United States? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 21:3005-3010. [PMID: 37536529 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.05.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Revised: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 05/26/2023] [Indexed: 08/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Douglas K Rex
- Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
| | - Uri Ladabaum
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Joseph C Anderson
- Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut
| | - Aasma Shaukat
- New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York Harbor Veterans Affairs Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Lynn F Butterly
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire
| | - Jason A Dominitz
- National Gastroenterology and Hepatology Program, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, District of Columbia; Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Tonya Kaltenbach
- Veterans Affairs San Francisco Healthcare System, San Francisco, California; Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | | | - Cesare Hassan
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy; Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
|
5
|
Schifferdecker KE, Ramesh NP, Walter LC, Calderwood AH. Multi-level Factors Influencing Decisions About Stopping Surveillance Colonoscopy in Older Adults: a Qualitative Study. J Gen Intern Med 2023; 38:2761-2767. [PMID: 37225959 PMCID: PMC10506966 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-023-08225-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about patient or provider experience and perceptions of stopping surveillance among older adults with a history of colon polyps. While guidelines recommend ceasing routine colorectal cancer screening in adults > 75 years and those with limited life expectancy, guidance for ceasing surveillance colonoscopy in those with prior colon polyps suggests individualizing recommendations. OBJECTIVE Identify processes, experiences, and gaps around individualizing decisions to stop or continue surveillance colonoscopy for older adults and areas for improvement. DESIGN Phenomenological qualitative study design using recorded semi-structured interviews from May 2020 through March 2021. PARTICIPANTS 15 patients aged ≥ 65 in polyp surveillance, 12 primary care providers (PCPs), and 13 gastroenterologists (GIs). APPROACH Data were analyzed using a mixed deductive (directed content analysis) and inductive (grounded theory) approach to identify themes related to stopping or continuing surveillance colonoscopies. KEY RESULTS Analysis resulted in 24 themes and were clustered into three main categories: health and clinical considerations; communication and roles; and system-level processes or structures. Overall, the study found support for discussions around age 75-80 on stopping surveillance colonoscopy with considerations for health and life expectancy and that PCPs should take a primary role. However, systems and processes for scheduling surveillance colonoscopies largely bypass PCPs which reduces opportunities to both individualize recommendations and facilitate patients' decision-making. CONCLUSIONS This study identified gaps in processes to implement current guidelines for individualizing surveillance colonoscopy as adults grow older, including opportunities to discuss stopping. Increasing the role of PCPs in polyp surveillance as patients grow older provides more opportunities for individualized recommendations, so patients can consider their own preferences, ask questions, and make a more informed choice for themselves. Changing existing systems and processes and creating supportive tools for shared decision-making specific to older adults with polyps would improve how surveillance colonoscopy is individualized in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen E Schifferdecker
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice at Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, NH, USA.
- Center for Program Design and Evaluation at Dartmouth, NH, Lebanon, USA.
| | - Nithya Puttige Ramesh
- Center for Program Design and Evaluation at Dartmouth, NH, Lebanon, USA
- School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Louise C Walter
- Division of Geriatrics, University of California San Francisco and San Francisco VA Health Care System, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Audrey H Calderwood
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice at Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, NH, USA
- Section of Gastroenterology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Cancer, Lebanon, NH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
6
|
Tomar NK, Shergill A, Rieders B, Bagci U, Jha D. TransResU-Net: A Transformer based ResU-Net for Real-Time Colon Polyp Segmentation. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 2023; 2023:1-4. [PMID: 38083589 DOI: 10.1109/embc40787.2023.10340572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2023]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common causes of cancer and cancer-related mortality worldwide. Performing colon cancer screening in a timely fashion is the key to early detection. Colonoscopy is the primary modality used to diagnose colon cancer. However, the miss rate of polyps, adenomas and advanced adenomas remains significantly high. Early detection of polyps at the precancerous stage can help reduce the mortality rate and the economic burden associated with colorectal cancer. Deep learning-based computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) system may help gastroenterologists to identify polyps that may otherwise be missed, thereby improving the polyp detection rate. Additionally, CADx system could prove to be a cost-effective system that improves long-term colorectal cancer prevention. In this study, we proposed a deep learning-based architecture for automatic polyp segmentation called Transformer ResU-Net (TransResU-Net). Our proposed architecture is built upon residual blocks with ResNet-50 as the backbone and takes advantage of the transformer self-attention mechanism as well as dilated convolution(s). Our experimental results on two publicly available polyp segmentation benchmark datasets showed that TransResU-Net obtained a highly promising dice score and a real-time speed. With high efficacy in our performance metrics, we concluded that TransResU-Net could be a strong benchmark for building a real-time polyp detection system for the early diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of colorectal cancer. The source code of the proposed TransResU-Net is publicly available at https://github.com/nikhilroxtomar/TransResUNet.
Collapse
|
|
7
|
Garg SK, Szymoniak AM, Johnson KF, Vaughn JK, Seelman JJ, Degen SC, Chaudhry R. Automated electronic health record-based application for sedation triage in routine colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 98:82-89.e1. [PMID: 36754154 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2022] [Revised: 01/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/01/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Nearly all routine endoscopy procedures are performed using moderate sedation (MS) or monitored anesthesia care (MAC). In this article, we describe how we improved decision-making and decreased practitioners' cognitive burden for choosing between MAC and MS by using patient data in an automated application within the electronic health record (EHR). METHODS In our practice, we choose between MS or MAC for routine GI procedures according to written anesthesia-use guidelines and practitioner preferences. To expedite our decision-making for MS versus MAC, we developed an Excel (Microsoft Corp, Redmond, Wash, USA)-based tool from patient demographic characteristics, comorbid conditions, and medication use extracted from the EHR. The data points from Excel were then implemented in the automated application in the EHR to predict the type of sedation for GI procedures. RESULTS Before use of the new application, nurses spent an average of 4 minutes and gastroenterology practitioners spent 5 minutes reviewing the EHR to determine the appropriate sedation (MS or MAC). After the application was implemented, the use of MS substantially increased. Time spent reviewing the EHR was reduced to 2 minutes. The rate of adverse events for MS (.5%) versus MAC (.6%) was comparable and low overall. CONCLUSIONS The EHR-based application, which automates and standardizes determination of sedation type, is a highly beneficial tool that eliminates subjectivity in decision-making, thus allowing for appropriate use of MAC. Adverse event rates and sedation failure did not increase with use of the application. With the increased use of MS over MAC, healthcare costs for the more-expensive MAC sedation should also decrease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sushil Kumar Garg
- Department of Gastroenterology, Mayo Clinic Health System-Northwest Wisconsin region, Eau Claire, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Amy M Szymoniak
- Department of Gastroenterology, Mayo Clinic Health System-Northwest Wisconsin region, Eau Claire, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Karen F Johnson
- Department of Information Technology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - John J Seelman
- Department of Information Technology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Susanne C Degen
- Vice Chair of Administration, Mayo Clinic Health System-Northwest Wisconsin region, Eau Claire, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Rajeev Chaudhry
- Department of Artificial Intelligence and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
8
|
Makaroff KE, Shergill J, Lauzon M, Khalil C, Ahluwalia SC, Spiegel BMR, Almario CV. Patient Preferences for Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests in Light of Lowering the Screening Age to 45 Years. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 21:520-531.e10. [PMID: 35870766 PMCID: PMC9852355 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2022] [Revised: 06/11/2022] [Accepted: 07/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS In 2021, the US Preventive Services Task Force lowered the colorectal cancer (CRC) screening age to 45 years. We used conjoint analysis, a method that assesses complex decision making, to update our understanding on people's CRC screening test preferences in the context of new guidelines. METHODS We conducted a conjoint analysis survey among unscreened individuals ≥40 years at average risk for CRC to determine the relative importance of screening test attributes in their decision making (eg, modality, effectiveness at reducing CRC risk, bowel prep). We also performed simulations to estimate the proportion of people who would prefer each US Multi-Society Task Force (MSTF) on CRC-recommended test. The analyses were stratified among those aged 40-49 years (newly or soon-to-be eligible for screening) and ≥50 years (have been eligible). RESULTS Overall, 1000 participants completed the conjoint analysis (40-49 years, n = 456; ≥50 years, n = 544). When considering all 5 US MSTF-recommended tests, there were differences in test preferences between age groups (P = .019), and the most preferred test was a fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-fecal DNA every 3 years: 40-49 years, 34.6%; ≥50 years, 37.3%. When considering only the US MSTF tier 1 tests, most 40- to 49- (68.9%) and ≥50-year-olds (77.4%; P = .004) preferred an annual FIT over a colonoscopy every 10 years. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that more than one-third of people may want to do a FIT-fecal DNA every 3 years for their CRC screening. When only considering US MSTF tier 1 tests, three-fourths of people may prefer an annual FIT over colonoscopy. Further research examining CRC screening test preferences among broader populations is warranted to inform and enhance screening programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine E Makaroff
- Cedars-Sinai Center for Outcomes Research and Education (CS-CORE), Los Angeles, California; David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jaspreet Shergill
- Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Marie Lauzon
- Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Research Center, Cedars-Sinai Cancer, Los Angeles, California
| | - Carine Khalil
- Cedars-Sinai Center for Outcomes Research and Education (CS-CORE), Los Angeles, California
| | - Sangeeta C Ahluwalia
- Department of Behavioral and Policy Sciences, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California; Department of Health Policy and Management, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, California
| | - Brennan M R Spiegel
- Cedars-Sinai Center for Outcomes Research and Education (CS-CORE), Los Angeles, California; David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California; Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California; Department of Health Policy and Management, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, California; Karsh Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California; Division of Health Services Research, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California; Division of Informatics, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California; Cancer Prevention & Control Program, Cedars-Sinai Cancer, Los Angeles, California
| | - Christopher V Almario
- Cedars-Sinai Center for Outcomes Research and Education (CS-CORE), Los Angeles, California; Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California; Karsh Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California; Division of Health Services Research, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California; Division of Informatics, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California; Cancer Prevention & Control Program, Cedars-Sinai Cancer, Los Angeles, California.
| |
Collapse
|
|
9
|
Hamashima C. Forthcoming Step in Gastric Cancer Prevention: How Can Risk Stratification Be Combined with Endoscopic Screening for Gastric Cancer? Gut Liver 2022; 16:811-824. [PMID: 35314519 PMCID: PMC9668507 DOI: 10.5009/gnl210313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2021] [Revised: 10/29/2021] [Accepted: 11/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Although the concern for gastric cancer prevention has increased, gastric cancer has remained a heavy burden worldwide and is not just a local issue in East Asian countries. However, as several screening programs (listed below) have shown some success, it is important to determine whether the situation is changing in some other countries and whether similar methods should be recommended. Endoscopic screening has been performed as a national program in South Korea and Japan, and the results have shown a reduction in gastric cancer mortality. Although the efficacy of Helicobacter pylori eradication has been established, the efficacy of the screen-and-treat strategy is presently being evaluated in randomized controlled trials. The serum pepsinogen test and endoscopic examination can divide high-risk subjects with severe gastric atrophy from average-risk subjects. Risk stratification is anticipated to contribute to an efficient method of prediction of gastric cancer development when combined with endoscopic screening. Countries with a high incidence rate should realize the immediate need to reduce gastric cancer death directly by endoscopic screening and should recognize screen-and-treat as a second option to reduce future risk. However, all forms of gastric cancer prevention programs have some harms and potential to increase unnecessary examinations. A balance of the benefits and harms should be always considered. Although further study is needed to obtain sufficient evidence for gastric cancer prevention, the best available method should be examined in the context of each country.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chisato Hamashima
- Health Policy Section, Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medical Technology, Teikyo University, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
|
10
|
Modi S, Picado O, Fiser C, Lubarsky M, Giri B, Hui V, Force L, Marchetti F, Sands LR, Paluvoi NV. Comparison of procedural outcomes between morning and afternoon colonoscopies performed by colorectal surgeons. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:6543-6550. [PMID: 35024931 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09022-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Accepted: 01/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Colonoscopy is a common procedure performed by colorectal surgeons for screening, diagnosis, and surveillance of various colorectal diseases. Existing literature has conflicting data on quality outcomes of colonoscopies performed in the afternoon and the morning schedules and only includes colonoscopies performed by gastroenterologists. We sought to analyze procedural outcomes between morning and afternoon colonoscopies performed by colorectal surgeons. DATA SOURCES AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES A retrospective chart review of colonoscopies performed by colorectal surgeons at a tertiary care center from October 2018 through July 2020 was performed. Complete colonoscopies with documented times were included. Patients with colonic resection and incomplete colonoscopy were excluded. Main outcome measures adenoma and polyp detection rates and colonoscopy time variables were compared between morning and afternoon colonoscopies. RESULTS A total of 781 patients were analyzed. Colonoscopies were evenly distributed during shifts (49% morning and 51% afternoon). The overall polyp and adenoma detection rates were 46% and 29%, respectively. There were no significant differences in adenoma and polyp detection rates and colonoscopy duration between morning and afternoon colonoscopies. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that history of prior polypectomy was an independent predictor of adenoma detection rate (OR: 2.17, 95% CI 1.33-3.54, p = 0.002) and was associated with significantly increased colonoscopy times in afternoon shift. CONCLUSION There were no differences in quality outcomes of adenoma and polyp detection rates between morning and afternoon colonoscopies performed by colorectal surgeons. In addition to known predictors, cecal intubation time and history of polypectomy were also independent predictors of adenoma detection rate. Patients with prior polypectomy had increased colonoscopy times in afternoon shift. Since colorectal surgeons perform higher proportion of diagnostic and surveillance colonoscopies, these patients may be better suited for colonoscopies in morning shift.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shrey Modi
- Division of Colon and Rectum Surgery, DeWitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1611 NW 12th avenue, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
| | - Omar Picado
- Division of Colon and Rectum Surgery, DeWitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1611 NW 12th avenue, Miami, FL, 33136, USA
| | - Caroline Fiser
- Division of Colon and Rectum Surgery, DeWitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1611 NW 12th avenue, Miami, FL, 33136, USA
| | - Maya Lubarsky
- Division of Colon and Rectum Surgery, DeWitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1611 NW 12th avenue, Miami, FL, 33136, USA
| | - Bhuwan Giri
- Division of Colon and Rectum Surgery, DeWitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1611 NW 12th avenue, Miami, FL, 33136, USA
| | - Vanessa Hui
- Division of Colon and Rectum Surgery, DeWitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1611 NW 12th avenue, Miami, FL, 33136, USA
| | - Luanne Force
- Division of Colon and Rectum Surgery, DeWitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1611 NW 12th avenue, Miami, FL, 33136, USA
| | - Floriano Marchetti
- Division of Colon and Rectum Surgery, DeWitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1611 NW 12th avenue, Miami, FL, 33136, USA
| | - Laurence R Sands
- Division of Colon and Rectum Surgery, DeWitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1611 NW 12th avenue, Miami, FL, 33136, USA
| | - Nivedh V Paluvoi
- Division of Colon and Rectum Surgery, DeWitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1611 NW 12th avenue, Miami, FL, 33136, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
11
|
Geographic distribution of colonoscopy providers in the United States: An analysis of medicare claims data. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:7673-7678. [PMID: 35729404 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09083-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2021] [Accepted: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Screening colonoscopy is one of the few procedures that can prevent cancer. While the majority of colonoscopies in the USA are performed by gastroenterologists, general surgeons play a key role in at-risk, rural populations. The aim of this study was to examine geographic practice patterns in colonoscopy using a nationwide Medicare claims database. METHODS AND PROCEDURES The 2017 Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment database was used to identify physicians performing colonoscopy. Providers were classified as gastroenterologists, surgeons, ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs), or other. Rural-Urban Commuting Area classification at the zip code level was used to determine whether the practice location for an individual provider was in a rural area/small town (< 10,000 people), micropolitan area (10-50,000 people), or metropolitan area (> 50,000 people). RESULTS Claims data from 3,861,187 colonoscopy procedures on Medicare patients were included. The majority of procedures were performed by gastroenterologists (57.2%) and ASCs (32.1%). Surgeons performed 6.8% of cases overall. When examined at a zip code level, surgeons performed 51.6% of procedures in small towns/rural areas and 21.7% of procedures in micropolitan areas. Individual surgeons performed fewer annual procedures as compared to gastroenterologists (median 51 vs. 187, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Surgeons perform the majority of colonoscopies in rural zip codes on Medicare patients. High-quality, surgical training in endoscopy is essential to ensure access to colonoscopy for patients outside of major metropolitan areas.
Collapse
|
|
12
|
Peery AF, Crockett SD, Murphy CC, Jensen ET, Kim HP, Egberg MD, Lund JL, Moon AM, Pate V, Barnes EL, Schlusser CL, Baron TH, Shaheen NJ, Sandler RS. Burden and Cost of Gastrointestinal, Liver, and Pancreatic Diseases in the United States: Update 2021. Gastroenterology 2022; 162:621-644. [PMID: 34678215 PMCID: PMC10756322 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.10.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 456] [Impact Index Per Article: 152.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Revised: 09/20/2021] [Accepted: 10/15/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Gastrointestinal diseases account for considerable health care use and expenditures. We estimated the annual burden, costs, and research funding associated with gastrointestinal, liver, and pancreatic diseases in the United States. METHODS We generated estimates using data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey; National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey; Nationwide Emergency Department Sample; National Inpatient Sample; Kids' Inpatient Database; Nationwide Readmissions Database; Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program; National Vital Statistics System; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research; MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters data; MarketScan Medicare Supplemental data; United Network for Organ Sharing registry; Medical Expenditure Panel Survey; and National Institutes of Health (NIH). RESULTS Gastrointestinal health care expenditures totaled $119.6 billion in 2018. Annually, there were more than 36.8 million ambulatory visits for gastrointestinal symptoms and 43.4 million ambulatory visits with a primary gastrointestinal diagnosis. Hospitalizations for a principal gastrointestinal diagnosis accounted for more than 3.8 million admissions, with 403,699 readmissions. A total of 22.2 million gastrointestinal endoscopies were performed, and 284,844 new gastrointestinal cancers were diagnosed. Gastrointestinal diseases and cancers caused 255,407 deaths. The NIH supported $3.1 billion (7.5% of the NIH budget) for gastrointestinal research in 2020. CONCLUSIONS Gastrointestinal diseases are responsible for millions of health care encounters and hundreds of thousands of deaths that annually costs billions of dollars in the United States. To reduce the high burden of gastrointestinal diseases, focused clinical and public health efforts, supported by additional research funding, are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne F Peery
- Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
| | - Seth D Crockett
- Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Caitlin C Murphy
- University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Hannah P Kim
- Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Matthew D Egberg
- Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Jennifer L Lund
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Andrew M Moon
- Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Virginia Pate
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Edward L Barnes
- Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Courtney L Schlusser
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Todd H Baron
- Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Nicholas J Shaheen
- Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Robert S Sandler
- Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
|
13
|
Leal C, Almeida N, Silva M, Santos A, Vasconcelos H, Figueiredo P. Appropriateness of Endoscopic Procedures: A Prospective, Multicenter Study. GE PORTUGUESE JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY 2022; 29:5-12. [PMID: 35111959 PMCID: PMC8787496 DOI: 10.1159/000515839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2020] [Accepted: 02/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/01/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Advances in endoscopy and open-access systems led to an increase in endoscopic procedures. However, overuse of endoscopy has been consistently reported. This study aims to assess the appropriateness of esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and colonoscopy referral in the private and public setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a prospective, multicenter study at 2 public and 5 private endoscopy units. Patients scheduled for elective EGD or colonoscopy were enrolled. Clinical data and endoscopy findings were recorded. Appropriateness of endoscopy was defined according to the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines (for EGD) and the European Panel on Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy II (for colonoscopy). RESULTS Regarding EGD: 215 patients enrolled (43.7% were males) with a mean age of 61.0 ± 15.1 years; 54.0% (n = 116) were in public hospitals. Referral by a gastroenterologist was made for 34.9% (n = 75). Appropriate indications were made for 62.3% (n = 134): 42.4% in private versus 79.3% in public endoscopy units (odds ratio [OR] 5.20; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.85-9.49; p < 0.01). Rate of appropriate EGD was 74.7% for gastroenterologist referral and 56.1% for other specialties (OR 2.31; 95% CI 1.24-4.28; p < 0.01). Diagnostic yield for relevant findings was 47.9%. No association between indication appropriateness, gastroenterologist referral, and relevant endoscopic findings was found. Regarding colonoscopy: 287 patients enrolled (49.1% were males) with a mean age of 60.4 ± 14.4 years; 48.1% (n = 138) were in public hospitals. Referral by a gastroenterologist was made for 20.6% (n = 59). Appropriate indications were made for 70.0% (n = 201): 53.0% in private vs. 88.4% in public endoscopy units (OR 6.75; 95% CI 3.66-12.47; p < 0.01). Diagnostic yield was 57.1%. Relevant endoscopic diagnosis was associated with indication: 63.2% in the appropriate vs. 43.0% in the nonappropriate indication group (p < 0.05). DISCUSSION A significant percentage of endoscopies, mainly in the private setting, were performed without an appropriate indication. This influenced the diagnostic yield. The use of adequate criteria is fundamental for the rational use of an open-access system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carina Leal
- Department of Gastroenterology, Centro Hospitalar de Leiria, Leiria, Portugal
| | - Nuno Almeida
- Department of Gastroenterology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Maria Silva
- Department of Gastroenterology, Centro Hospitalar de Leiria, Leiria, Portugal
| | - Antonieta Santos
- Department of Gastroenterology, Centro Hospitalar de Leiria, Leiria, Portugal
| | - Helena Vasconcelos
- Department of Gastroenterology, Centro Hospitalar de Leiria, Leiria, Portugal
| | - Pedro Figueiredo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
|
14
|
Almario CV, Shergill J, Oh J. Measuring and Improving Quality of Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Screening. TECHNIQUES AND INNOVATIONS IN GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY 2022; 24:269-283. [PMID: 36778081 PMCID: PMC9910391 DOI: 10.1016/j.tige.2021.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is largely preventable, yet it remains a major public health issue as it is the third most common and deadly malignancy in the United States. While there are many ways to screen for CRC, colonoscopy remains the gold standard as it is the only test that is both cancer-detecting and cancer-preventing through removal of precancerous polyps. Through identifying and removing neoplastic lesions, colonoscopy reduces CRC incidence by 31%-91% and CRC mortality by 65%-88%. However, colonoscopy is not an infallible test-there is a chance for missed lesions during the exam and there is substantial variation in outcomes among endoscopists. To enhance the quality of colonoscopic exams, and ultimately to improve CRC outcomes, quality indicators have been developed for measuring endoscopists' performance. In this review, we describe the colonoscopic quality indicators and benchmarks recommended by the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy/American College of Gastroenterology Task Force on Quality in Endoscopy for screening colonoscopies in average-risk individuals. Measuring and monitoring endoscopists' performance on these measures are critical first steps in striving toward conducting high quality exams. We also review the evidence for interventions that aim to improve critical measures including adenoma detection rate, withdrawal time, cecal intubation, and bowel preparation quality. Finally, we provide a preview of the forthcoming Advancing Care for Appropriate Colon Health Merit-Based Incentive Payment System Value Pathway by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and its potential impact on clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher V. Almario
- Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California;,Karsh Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California;,Division of Health Services Research, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California;,Cedars-Sinai Center for Outcomes Research and Education (CS-CORE), Los Angeles, California;,Division of Informatics, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California;,Cancer Prevention & Control Program, Cedars-Sinai Cancer, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jaspreet Shergill
- Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Janice Oh
- Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
|
15
|
Current Trends and Predictors of Case Outcomes for Malpractice in Colonoscopy in the United States. J Clin Gastroenterol 2022; 56:49-54. [PMID: 33337638 DOI: 10.1097/mcg.0000000000001471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2020] [Accepted: 10/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Over 14 million colonoscopies are performed annually, and this procedure remains the largest contributor to malpractice claims against gastroenterologists. The aim of this study was to evaluate reasons for litigation and predictors of case outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS Cases related to colonoscopy were reviewed within the Westlaw legal database. Patient demographics, reasons for litigation, case payouts, and verdicts were assessed. Multivariate regression was used to determine predictors of defendant verdicts. RESULTS A total of 305 cases were included from years 1980 to 2017. Average patient age was 54.9 years (range, 4 to 93) and 52.8% of patients were female. Juries returned defendant and plaintiff verdicts in 51.8% and 25.2% of cases, respectively, and median payout was $995,000. Top reasons for litigation included delay in treatment (65.9%) and diagnosis (65.6%), procedural error (44.3%), and failure to refer (25.6%). Gastroenterologists were defendants in 71% of cases, followed by primary care (32.2%) and surgeons (14.8%). Cases citing informed consent predicted defendant verdict (odds ratio, 4.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.90-9.45) while medication error predicted plaintiff verdict (odds ratio, 0.18; 95% confidence interval, 0.04-0.59). Delay in diagnosis (P=0.060) and failure to refer (P=0.074) trended toward plaintiff verdict but did not reach significance. Most represented states were New York (21.0%), California (13.4%), Pennsylvania (13.1%), Massachusetts (12.5%). CONCLUSIONS Malpractice related to colonoscopy remains a significant and has geographic variability. Errors related to sedation predicted plaintiff verdict and may represent a target to reduce litigation. Primary care physicians and surgeons were frequently cited codefendants, underscoring the significance of interdisciplinary care for colonoscopy.
Collapse
|
|
16
|
Issa D. Inpatient Endoscopy Delay: Evaluating a Real World Problem and Search for Solutions. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 19:2496-2498. [PMID: 34391924 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.08.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2021] [Revised: 08/08/2021] [Accepted: 08/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Danny Issa
- Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
|
17
|
Rubenstein JH, Jiang L, Kurlander JE, Chen J, Metko V, Khodadost M, Nofz K, Raghunathan T. Incomplete Response of Gastroesophageal Reflux Symptoms Poorly Predicts Erosive Esophagitis or Barrett's Esophagus. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 19:2284-2292.e2. [PMID: 32835843 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.08.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2020] [Revised: 08/09/2020] [Accepted: 08/17/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Many patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) not responding to a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) undergo an upper endoscopy. We hypothesized that an incomplete response to a PPI is not associated with findings of esophageal pathology on endoscopy, and that psychological distress is associated inversely with pathology. METHODS We enrolled consecutive individuals aged 40 to 79 years with prior heartburn or regurgitation. Logistic regression was used to estimate the effects of incomplete response of GERD symptoms and psychological distress on the odds of finding erosive esophagitis or Barrett's esophagus. RESULTS A total of 625 patients completed the study. A total of 254 (66.8% of those taking PPI) had GERD symptoms incompletely responsive to a PPI and 352 (56.3%) had severe somatization. An incomplete response to a PPI was associated with psychological distress (P < .001). Erosive esophagitis was found in 148 subjects (23.7%) and Barrett's esophagus in 58 (9.3%). Overall, an incomplete response to a PPI was not found to be associated with these pathologies (odds ratio, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.720-1.91). In contrast, greater psychological distress was associated inversely with erosive esophagitis or Barrett's esophagus (in particular, highest vs lowest tertile somatization: odds ratio, 0.590; 95% CI, 0.365-0.952). CONCLUSIONS Patients undergoing upper endoscopy frequently have GERD symptoms incompletely responding to a PPI and a high burden of somatization. However, an incomplete response of GERD symptoms is a poor predictor for endoscopic pathology, and should not be relied upon for selecting patients for screening for Barrett's esophagus. Patients with high psychological distress are less likely to have esophageal pathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joel H Rubenstein
- Medicine Section, Ann Arbor Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Barrett's Esophagus Program, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
| | - Li Jiang
- Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Jacob E Kurlander
- Medicine Section, Ann Arbor Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Barrett's Esophagus Program, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Joan Chen
- Barrett's Esophagus Program, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Valbona Metko
- Barrett's Esophagus Program, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Maryam Khodadost
- Medicine Section, Ann Arbor Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Kimberly Nofz
- Medicine Section, Ann Arbor Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Trivellore Raghunathan
- Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
|
18
|
Ramai D, Singh J, Brooks OW, Barakat M, Mohan BP, Chandan S, Khan SR, Dhindsa B, Dhaliwal A, Ofosu A, Adler DG. Comparison of left versus right lateral starting position on colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Gastroenterol 2021; 34:699-704. [PMID: 34475741 PMCID: PMC8375655 DOI: 10.20524/aog.2021.0639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 02/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Modifying patient position during colonoscopy has been proposed as a simple and inexpensive technique to increase luminal distention and improve navigation through the large bowel. The left lateral (LL) decubitus starting position is commonly used during colonoscopy. However, reports indicate that other starting positions may offer additional benefit. We aimed to determine if the right lateral (RL) starting position compared to the standard LL starting position could improve outcomes in colonoscopy. METHODS We searched PubMed, Medline, and EMBASE through June 2020 to identify studies comparing RL and LL starting positions during colonoscopy. The primary outcomes included mean cecal insertion time and cecal intubation rate, and adverse events were assessed by pooling data using a random-effects model expressed in terms of odds ratio (OR), mean difference, and 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS We identified 5 randomized controlled trials, including 809 participants, that compared LL vs. RL colonoscopy. The pooled OR for cecal intubation rate was 1.3 (95%CI 0.8-2.3; P=0.3). The mean difference in mean cecal insertion time was 0.08 (95%CI -0.09 to 0.26; P=0.4). Heterogeneity between studies was low (I 2=0%). No complications were reported in either arm of the study. Pain scores assessed using a visual analog scale were comparable among both arms of the study. CONCLUSION The RL starting position for colonoscopy was comparable to the LL and offered no additional benefit in terms of cecal intubation time, intubation rate, or patient discomfort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daryl Ramai
- Department of Internal Medicine, The Brooklyn Hospital Center, Brooklyn, New York (Daryl Ramai, Olivia W. Brooks)
| | - Jameel Singh
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mather Hospital, Port Jefferson, New York (Jameel Singh)
| | - Olivia W. Brooks
- Department of Internal Medicine, The Brooklyn Hospital Center, Brooklyn, New York (Daryl Ramai, Olivia W. Brooks)
| | - Mohamed Barakat
- Division of Gastroenterology, The Brooklyn Hospital Center, Brooklyn, New York (Mohamed Barakat)
| | - Babu P. Mohan
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah (Babu P. Mohan, Douglas G. Adler)
| | - Saurabh Chandan
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, CHI Health Creighton University Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska (Saurabh Chandan)
| | - Shahab R. Khan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois (Shahab R. Khan)
| | - Banreet Dhindsa
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska (Banreet Dhindsa)
| | - Amaninder Dhaliwal
- Division of Gastroenterology, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida (Amaninder Dhaliwal)
| | - Andrew Ofosu
- Division of Gastroenterology, Stanford University, Stanford, California (Andrew Ofosu), USA
| | - Douglas G. Adler
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah (Babu P. Mohan, Douglas G. Adler)
| |
Collapse
|
|
19
|
Manfredi L. Endorobots for Colonoscopy: Design Challenges and Available Technologies. Front Robot AI 2021; 8:705454. [PMID: 34336938 PMCID: PMC8317132 DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2021.705454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2021] [Accepted: 06/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common cause of cancer death worldwide, after lung cancer (Sung et al., 2021). Early stage detection is key to increase the survival rate. Colonoscopy remains to be the gold standard procedure due to its dual capability to optically inspect the entire colonic mucosa and to perform interventional procedures at the same time. However, this causes pain and discomfort, whereby it requires sedation or anaesthesia of the patient. It is a difficult procedure to perform that can cause damage to the colonic wall in some cases. Development of new technologies aims to overcome the current limitations on colonoscopy by using advancements in endorobotics research. The design of these advanced medical devices is challenging because of the limited space of the lumen, the contorted shape, and the long tract of the large bowel. The force applied to the colonic wall needs to be controlled to avoid collateral effects such as injuries to the colonic mucosa and pain during the procedure. This article discusses the current challenges in the colonoscopy procedure, the available locomotion technologies for endorobots used in colonoscopy at a prototype level and the commercial products available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi Manfredi
- Division of Imaging Science and Technology, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
|
20
|
Machlab S, Martínez-Bauer E, López P, Piqué N, Puig-Diví V, Junquera F, Lira A, Brullet E, Selva A, García-Iglesias P, Calvet X, Campo R. Comparable quality of bowel preparation with single-day versus three-day low-residue diet: Randomized controlled trial. Dig Endosc 2021; 33:797-806. [PMID: 33015912 DOI: 10.1111/den.13860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2020] [Revised: 09/23/2020] [Accepted: 09/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS There is controversy about the length of low-residue diet (LRD) for colonoscopy preparation. The aim of the study was to compare one-day vs. three-day LRD associated to standard laxative treatment for achieving an adequate colonoscopy preparation in average risk subjects with positive fecal immunochemical test undergoing screening colonoscopy. METHODS A non-inferiority, randomized, controlled, parallel-group clinical trial was performed in the setting of average risk colorectal cancer screening program. Participants were randomized to receive 1-day vs. 3-day LRD in addition to standard polyethilenglicol treatment. Adequacy of preparation was evaluated using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). Primary outcome was achieving a BBPS ≥ 2 in all colon segments. Analysis was performed for a non-inferiority margin of 5%, a 95% statistical power and one-sided 0.05 significance level. RESULTS A total of 855 patients were randomized. Adequate bowel preparation was similar between groups: 97.9% of patients in the 1-day LRD group vs 96.9% in the 3-day LRD group achieved the primary outcome (P-value for non-inferiority < 0.001). The percentage of patients with BBPS scores ≥ 8 was superior in the 1-day LRD group (254 vs 221 in the 3-day LRD group, P = 0.032). The 1-day regimen was better tolerated than the 3-day diet. 47.7% (vs 28.7%, P < 0.05) of patients rated the 1-day LRD as very easy to follow. CONCLUSION The 1-day LRD is non-inferior to 3-day LRD for achieving an adequate colon cleansing before average risk screening colonoscopy and it is better tolerated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salvador Machlab
- Gastroenterology Department, Institut d'Investigació i Innovació Parc Taulí I3PT, Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain.,Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Eva Martínez-Bauer
- Gastroenterology Department, Institut d'Investigació i Innovació Parc Taulí I3PT, Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain.,Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Pilar López
- Clinical Epidemiology and Cancer Screening, Institut d'Investigació i Innovació Parc Taulí I3PT, Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Núria Piqué
- Microbiology Section, Department of Biology, Healthcare and Environment, Faculty of Pharmacy and Food Sciences, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Spain.,Institut de Recerca en Nutrició i Seguretat Alimentària de la UB (INSA-UB), Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Valentí Puig-Diví
- Gastroenterology Department, Institut d'Investigació i Innovació Parc Taulí I3PT, Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Félix Junquera
- Gastroenterology Department, Institut d'Investigació i Innovació Parc Taulí I3PT, Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alba Lira
- Gastroenterology Department, Institut d'Investigació i Innovació Parc Taulí I3PT, Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Enric Brullet
- Gastroenterology Department, Institut d'Investigació i Innovació Parc Taulí I3PT, Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anna Selva
- Clinical Epidemiology and Cancer Screening, Institut d'Investigació i Innovació Parc Taulí I3PT, Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pilar García-Iglesias
- Gastroenterology Department, Institut d'Investigació i Innovació Parc Taulí I3PT, Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Xavier Calvet
- Gastroenterology Department, Institut d'Investigació i Innovació Parc Taulí I3PT, Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain.,Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Rafel Campo
- Gastroenterology Department, Institut d'Investigació i Innovació Parc Taulí I3PT, Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain.,Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
|
21
|
Hamashima C, Sasaki S, Hosono S, Hoshi K, Katayama T, Terasawa T. National Data Analysis and Systematic Review for Human Resources for Cervical Cancer Screening in Japan. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2021; 22:1695-1702. [PMID: 34181323 PMCID: PMC8418842 DOI: 10.31557/apjcp.2021.22.6.1695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2021] [Accepted: 06/04/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although cervical cancer screening has been performed as a national program since 1983 in Japan, the participation rate has remained below 20%. Equity of access is a basic requirement for cancer screening. However, taking smears from the cervix has been limited to gynecologists or obstetricians in Japan and it might be a barrier for accessibility. We examined the current access and its available human resources for cervical cancer screening in Japan. METHODS We analyzed the number of gynecologists and obstetricians among 47 prefectures based on a national survey. A systematic review was performed to clarify disparity and use of human resources in cervical cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment for cervical cancers in Japan. Candidate literature was searched using Ovid-MEDLINE and Ichushi-Web until the end of January 2020. Then, a systematic review regarding accessibility to cervical cancer screening was performed. The results of the selected articles were summarized in the tables. RESULTS Although the total number of all physicians in Japan increased from 1996 to 2016, the proportion of gynecologists and obstetricians has remained at approximately 5% over the last 2 decades. 43.6% of municipalities have no gynecologists and obstetricians in 2016. Through a systematic review, 4 English articles and 1 Japanese article were selected. From these 5 articles, the association between human resources and participation rates in cervical cancer screening was examined in 2 articles. CONCLUSIONS The human resources for taking smears for cervical cancer screening has remained insufficient with a huge disparity among municipalities in Japan. To improve accessibility for cervical cancer screening another option which may be considered could be involving general physicians as potential smear takers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chisato Hamashima
- Health Policy Section, Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medical Technology, Teikyo University, 2-11-1 Kaga, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo 173-1211, Japan.
| | - Seiju Sasaki
- Center for Preventive Medicine, St. Luke’s International Hospital, 8-1 Akashi-cho Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-6591, Japan.
| | - Satoyo Hosono
- Cancer Screening Assessment Section, Division of Screening Assessment and Management, Center for Public Health Science, National Cancer Center, 5-1-1 Tsukiji Cyuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
| | - Keika Hoshi
- Center for Public Health Informatics, National Institute of Public Health, 2-3-6 Minami, Wako 351-0197, Japan.
- Department of Hygiene, Kitazato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitazato Minami-ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0374 Japan.
| | - Takafumi Katayama
- College of Nursing Art and Science, University of Hyogo Prefecture, 13-71 Kita-Ohji, Akashi 673-8588, Japan.
| | - Teruhiko Terasawa
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Emergency and General Internal, Medicine, Fujita Medical University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Aichi 470-1192, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
|
22
|
Imperiale TF, Monahan PO, Stump TE, Ransohoff DF. Derivation and validation of a predictive model for advanced colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. Gut 2021; 70:1155-1161. [PMID: 32994311 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-321698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2020] [Revised: 08/27/2020] [Accepted: 08/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Knowing risk for advanced colorectal neoplasia (AN) could help patients and providers choose among screening tests, improving screening efficiency and uptake. We created a risk prediction model for AN to help decide which test might be preferred, a use not considered for existing models. DESIGN Average-risk 50-to-80-year olds undergoing first-time screening colonoscopy were recruited from endoscopy units in Indiana. We measured sociodemographic and physical features, medical and family history and lifestyle factors and linked these to the most advanced finding. We derived a risk equation on two-thirds of the sample and assigned points to each variable to create a risk score. Scores with comparable risks were collapsed into risk categories. The model and score were tested on the remaining sample. RESULTS Among 3025 subjects in the derivation set (mean age 57.3 (6.5) years; 52% women), AN prevalence was 9.4%. The 13-variable model (c-statistic=0.77) produced three risk groups with AN risks of 1.5% (95% CI 0.72% to 2.74%), 7.06% (CI 5.89% to 8.38%) and 27.26% (CI 23.47% to 31.30%) in low-risk, intermediate-risk and high-risk groups (p value <0.001), containing 23%, 59% and 18% of subjects, respectively. In the validation set of 1475 subjects (AN prevalence of 8.4%), model performance was comparable (c-statistic=0.78), with AN risks of 2.73% (CI 1.25% to 5.11%), 5.57% (CI 4.12% to 7.34%) and 25.79% (CI 20.51% to 31.66%) in low-risk, intermediate-risk and high-risk subgroups, respectively (p<0.001), containing proportions of 23%, 59% and 18%. CONCLUSION Among average-risk persons, this model estimates AN risk with high discrimination, identifying a lower risk subgroup that may be screened non-invasively and a higher risk subgroup for which colonoscopy may be preferred. The model could help guide patient-provider discussions of screening options, may increase screening adherence and conserve colonoscopy resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas F Imperiale
- Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA .,Center for Innovation, Health Services Research and Development, Richard L Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA.,The Regenstrief Institute Inc, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Patrick O Monahan
- Department of Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Timothy E Stump
- Department of Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - David F Ransohoff
- Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
23
|
Adlung L, Cohen Y, Mor U, Elinav E. Machine learning in clinical decision making. MED 2021; 2:642-665. [DOI: 10.1016/j.medj.2021.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2021] [Revised: 03/22/2021] [Accepted: 04/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
|
24
|
Mathew S, Nadeem S, Kaufman A. VISUALIZING MISSING SURFACES IN COLONOSCOPY VIDEOS USING SHARED LATENT SPACE REPRESENTATIONS. PROCEEDINGS. IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BIOMEDICAL IMAGING 2021; 2021:329-333. [PMID: 34642595 PMCID: PMC8504422 DOI: 10.1109/isbi48211.2021.9433982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Optical colonoscopy (OC), the most prevalent colon cancer screening tool, has a high miss rate due to a number of factors, including the geometry of the colon (haustral fold and sharp bends occlusions), endoscopist inexperience or fatigue, endoscope field of view. We present a framework to visualize the missed regions per-frame during OC, and provides a workable clinical solution. Specifically, we make use of 3D reconstructed virtual colonoscopy (VC) data and the insight that VC and OC share the same underlying geometry but differ in color, texture and specular reflections, embedded in the OC. A lossy unpaired image-to-image translation model is introduced with enforced shared latent space for OC and VC. This shared space captures the geometric information while deferring the color, texture, and specular information creation to additional Gaussian noise input. The latter can be utilized to generate one-to-many mappings from VC to OC and OC to OC. The code, data and trained models will be released via our Computational Endoscopy Platform at https://github.com/nadeemlab/CEP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shawn Mathew
- Stony Brook University, Department of Computer Science, USA
| | - Saad Nadeem
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Medical Physics, USA
| | - Arie Kaufman
- Stony Brook University, Department of Computer Science, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
25
|
≥3 Nonadvanced Adenomas are More Common in the Era of Contemporary Colonoscopy and Not Associated With Metachronous Advanced Neoplasia. J Clin Gastroenterol 2021; 55:343-349. [PMID: 32427796 DOI: 10.1097/mcg.0000000000001364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2019] [Accepted: 04/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Data from standard definition colonoscopy era demonstrate patients with an advanced adenoma (≥10 mm, villous features or high-grade dysplasia) or ≥3 nonadvanced adenomas are considered high-risk for metachronous advanced neoplasia (MAN). Low-risk adenoma (LRA) patients are those with 1 to 2, <10 mm tubular adenomas. High definition colonoscopy, split-dose bowel preparation, and attention to adenoma detection enhance diminutive adenoma detection. We compared baseline adenoma characteristics between patients undergoing colonoscopy in a historic cohort (HC) and contemporary cohort (CC) to determine if number of patients with ≥3 nonadvanced adenomas are increased in CC, and if those features are associated with MAN in CC. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients undergoing their first colonoscopy in HC (<2006) and CC (≥2006) at age 50 and above were identified through natural language processing. Multivariable regression analysis compared baseline adenoma characteristics between HC and CC, and determined the association between baseline characteristics and MAN in CC patients. RESULTS In total, 255,074 colonoscopies were performed between 1990 and 2015. A total of 9773 colonoscopies performed in the HC and 59,531 in the CC were included. At baseline, CC patients were more likely to have ≥3 nonadvanced adenomas [odds ratio (OR): 2.1, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.7-2.6]. In 3,377 CC patients undergoing follow-up colonoscopy, the risk of MAN did not differ between patients with LRA versus those with ≥3 nonadvanced adenomas (6.3% vs. 4.6%, OR: 1.4, CI: 0.58-3.5) including 3-4 (6.1%, OR: 1.4, CI: 0.52-3.6) and ≥5 (7.7%, OR: 1.8, CI: 0.23-14.6), although few patients had ≥5 nonadvanced adenomas. CONCLUSIONS Colonoscopy in the contemporary era increases detection of patients with ≥3 nonadvanced adenomas, which do not increase the risk of MAN compared with LRA patients. A similar surveillance to LRA patients should be considered for those patients.
Collapse
|
|
26
|
Hayman CV, Vyas D. Screening colonoscopy: The present and the future. World J Gastroenterol 2021; 27:233-239. [PMID: 33519138 PMCID: PMC7814366 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i3.233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2020] [Revised: 11/10/2020] [Accepted: 12/11/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
In the United States, colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of mortality in men and women. We are now seeing an increasing number of patients with advanced-stage diagnosis and mortality from colorectal cancer before 50 years of age, which requires earlier screening. With the increasing need for CRC screening through colonoscopy, and thus endoscopists, easier and simpler techniques are needed to train proficient endoscopists. The most widely used approach by endoscopists is air insufflation colonoscopy, where air distends the colon to allow visualization of the colonic mucosa. This technique is un-comfortable for patients and requires an anesthetist to administer sedation. In addition, patients commonly complain about discomfort post-op as air escapes into the small bowel and cannot be adequately removed. Current research into the use of water insufflation colonoscopies has proved promising in reducing the need for sedation, decreasing discomfort, and increasing the visibility of the colonic mucosa. Future direction into water insufflation colonoscopies which have shown to be simpler and easier to teach may increase the number of proficient endoscopists in training to serve our aging population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chelsea V Hayman
- College of Medicine, California Northstate University, Elk Grove, CA 95757, United States
| | - Dinesh Vyas
- College of Medicine, California Northstate University, Elk Grove, CA 95757, United States
- Department of Surgery, San Joaquin General Hospital, French Camp, CA 95231, United States
| |
Collapse
|
|
27
|
Rasheed T, Alvi H, Shaikh MA, Ali FS, Zuberi BF, Subhan W. Frequency of hyponatremia caused by sodium picosulfate solution when used as a bowel cleansing agent for colonoscopy. Pak J Med Sci 2020; 36:1651-1654. [PMID: 33235591 PMCID: PMC7674881 DOI: 10.12669/pjms.36.7.2376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2020] [Revised: 07/15/2020] [Accepted: 08/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the frequency of hyponatremia in patients taking Sodium Picosulfate Solution (SPS) solution for bowel preparation prior to colonoscopy and to compare serum sodium levels before and after SPS. METHODS This interventional study was conducted at Dr. Ruth K. M. Pfau, Civil Hospital Karachi between June 2019 to November 2019. Patients undergoing colonoscopy were included in the study. All patients were given SPS. Two samples of blood for electrolytes were taken, one 30 minutes before taking SPS solution and another 30 minutes before colonoscopy. Paired sample t-test was used to determine the difference between serum sodium level before taking the colonoscopy solution and serum sodium level before colonoscopy. RESULTS Fifty- four patients fulfilling inclusion criteria were included. Out of the 54 patients 28 (51.9%) were males and 26 (48.1%) were females. Mean sodium levels before taking colonoscopy solution was 139.7 ±3.5 mEq/L and mean sodium level before colonoscopy was 138.9 ±3.8 mEq/L. The difference between serum sodium level before taking SPS colonoscopy solution and before colonoscopy was found to be statistically insignificant (t (53) = 1.308; p = 0.196). CONCLUSION No serious adverse effects were reported in any of our patients. There was no significant difference in the serum sodium level of patients undergoing colonoscopy before taking SPS bowel preparation solution and serum sodium level before colonoscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tazeen Rasheed
- Dr. Tazeen Rasheed, Assistant Professor, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Haris Alvi
- Prof. Haris Alvi, MBBS, FCPS. Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Majid Ahmed Shaikh
- Dr. Majid Ahmed Shaikh, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Faiza Sadaqat Ali
- Dr. Faiza Sadaqat Ali, Senior Registrar, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Bader Faiyaz Zuberi
- Prof. Bader Faiyaz Zuberi, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Wara Subhan
- Dr. Wara Subhan, Postgraduate trainee, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
|
28
|
D'Orazio B, Cudia B, Martorana G, Di Vita G, Geraci G. Conservative Treatment of Splenic Haematoma After Colonoscopy: A Case Report. Cureus 2020; 12:e10531. [PMID: 33094071 PMCID: PMC7574971 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.10531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Colonoscopy is a routine procedure performed worldwide, nevertheless, a small risk of splenic injury, often under-estimated, is still present. As a matter of fact, the diagnosis may be delayed, leading to a rising risk of morbidity and mortality. This paper describes a case of conservative treatment of colonoscopy-associated splenic injury. A 57-year-old woman presented with worsening pain in the upper left abdominal quadrant; she had radiation therapy to the ipsilateral subscapular region, and a diagnostic colonoscopy 18 hours earlier. The computed tomography (CT) scan revealed splenic laceration without signs of hemoperitoneum. Because of the hemodynamic stability of the patient, successful conservative treatment and serial controls of the blood and hemodynamic parameters were adopted. Even if rare splenic injury during colonoscopy is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. A high degree of clinical suspicion is essential to achieve a prompt diagnosis as well as an early surgical evaluation. The nonoperative approach is usually taken in patients with no intraperitoneal bleeding, a closed subcapsular haematoma and a stable hemodynamic status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Bianca Cudia
- Surgical, Oncological and Stomatological Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, ITA
| | - Guido Martorana
- General and Oncological Surgery, Fondazione G.Giglio Cefalù, Cefalù, ITA
| | - Gaetano Di Vita
- Surgical, Oncological and Stomatological Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, ITA
| | - Girolamo Geraci
- Surgical, Oncological and Stomatological Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, ITA
| |
Collapse
|
|
29
|
Lee B, Jain D, Rajala M. A Survey of Peri-Colonoscopy Management of Anti-Diabetic Medications. Clin Endosc 2020; 53:623-626. [PMID: 32340087 PMCID: PMC7548143 DOI: 10.5946/ce.2020.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2020] [Accepted: 03/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Byeori Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Albert Einstein Healthcare Network, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Deepanshu Jain
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Digestive Diseases and Transplantation, Albert Einstein Healthcare Network, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Michael Rajala
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Digestive Diseases and Transplantation, Albert Einstein Healthcare Network, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
30
|
Comparison of a simplified nasal continuous positive airways pressure device with nasal cannula in obese patients undergoing colonoscopy during deep sedation: A randomised clinical trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2020; 36:633-640. [PMID: 31313720 DOI: 10.1097/eja.0000000000001052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Continuous positive airways pressure (CPAP) with a CPAP machine and mask has been shown to be more effective at minimising hypoxaemia than other devices under deep sedation. However, the efficacy of a new and simple CPAP device for spontaneously breathing obese patients during colonoscopy is unknown. OBJECTIVE We hypothesised that oxygenation and ventilation in obese patients under deep sedation during colonoscopy using CPAP via a new nasal mask (SuperNO2VA) would be better than routine care with oxygen supplementation via a nasal cannula. DESIGN Randomised study. SETTING Single-centre, June 2017 to October 2017. PATIENTS A total of 174 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to Mask group or Control group. Thirty-eight patients were excluded and data from 136 patients underwent final analysis. INTERVENTION Patients in the Mask group were provided with nasal CPAP (10 cmH2O) at an oxygen flow rate of 15 l min. In the Control group, patients were given oxygen via a nasal cannula at a flow rate of 5 l min. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was elapsed time from anaesthesia induction to the first airway intervention. RESULTS The elapsed time from anaesthesia induction to the first airway intervention was 19 ± 10 min in the Mask group (n=63) vs. 10 ± 12 min in the Control group (n=73, P < 0.001). In all, 87.5% (56/64) of patients achieved the target CPAP value. More patients in the Control group (63%) received airway intervention than in the Mask group (22%) (P < 0.001). Hypoxaemia (pulse oximeter oxygen saturation, SpO2 < 90%) occurred more frequently in the Control group (22%) than in the Mask group (5%) (P = 0.004). Minute ventilationPostinduction/minute ventilationBaseline and minute ventilationProcedure-end/minute ventilationBaseline was lower in the Control group than in the Mask group (P = 0.007 and 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION Application of a nasal mask at a target CPAP of 10 cmH2O improves ventilation and decreases the frequency and severity of hypoxaemia. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT03139448, registered at ClinicalTrials.gov.
Collapse
|
|
31
|
Rubenstein JH, McConnell D, Waljee AK, Metko V, Nofz K, Khodadost M, Jiang L, Raghunathan T. Validation and Comparison of Tools for Selecting Individuals to Screen for Barrett's Esophagus and Early Neoplasia. Gastroenterology 2020; 158:2082-2092. [PMID: 32119928 PMCID: PMC7282990 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.02.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2019] [Revised: 02/12/2020] [Accepted: 02/19/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Guidelines suggest endoscopic screening of individuals who are at increased risk for Barrett's esophagus (BE) and esophageal adenocarcinoma. Tools based on clinical factors are available for identifying patients at risk, but only some have been validated. We aimed to compare and validate available tools. METHODS We performed a prospective study of 1241 patients, ages 40 to 79 years, presenting either for their first esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) or their first endoscopic therapy of early neoplastic BE, from April 2015 through June 2018. We calculated risk scores for 6 previously published tools (the Gerson, Locke, Thrift, Michigan BE pREdiction Tool [M-BERET], Nord-Trøndelag Health Study [HUNT], and Kunzmann tools). We also investigated the accuracy of frequency and duration of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), using data from a randomly selected 50% of patients undergoing their first EGD. We compared the ability of all these tools to discriminate patients with BE and early neoplasia from patients without BE, using findings from endoscopy as the reference standard. RESULTS BE was detected in 81 of 1152 patients during their first EGD (7.0%). GERD symptoms alone identified patients with BE with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AuROC) of 0.579. All of the tools were more accurate in identifying patients with BE than the frequency and duration of GERD (AuROC for GERD, 0.579 vs range for other tools, 0.660-0.695), and predicted risk correlated well with observed risk (calibration). The AUROCs of the HUNT tool (0.796), the M-BERET (0.773), and the Kunzmann tool (0.763) were comparable in discriminating between patients with early neoplasia (n = 94) vs no BE. Each tool was more accurate in discriminating BE with early neoplasia than GERD frequency and duration alone (AuROC, 0.667; P < .01). CONCLUSIONS The HUNT, M-BERET, and Kunzmann tools identify patients with BE with AuROC values ranging from 0.665 to 0.695, and discriminate patients with early neoplasia from patients without BE with AuROC values ranging from 0.763 to 0.796. These tools are more accurate than frequency and duration of GERD in identifying individuals at risk for neoplastic BE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joel H. Rubenstein
- Ann Arbor Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI,Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Daniel McConnell
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Akbar K. Waljee
- Ann Arbor Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI,Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Valbona Metko
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Kimberly Nofz
- Ann Arbor Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI
| | | | - Li Jiang
- Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Trivellore Raghunathan
- Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI,Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI
| |
Collapse
|
|
32
|
Murphy CC, Halm EA, Skinner CS, Balasubramanian BA, Singal AG. Challenges and Approaches to Measuring Repeat Fecal Immunochemical Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020; 29:1557-1563. [PMID: 32457184 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-20-0230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2020] [Revised: 04/14/2020] [Accepted: 05/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer screening with fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) can reduce colorectal cancer-related mortality. Effectiveness of FIT may be compromised when patients do not adhere to a regular schedule. However, having no standard measure of repeat FIT presents challenges for assessing effectiveness across populations and settings. We compared three measures of repeat FIT in a large, integrated health care system in Dallas, Texas. METHODS We identified 18,257 patients age-eligible (50-60 years) for FIT in January 1-December 31, 2010 and followed over four rounds of screening. Measures included: (i) repeat FIT in prior screeners, or completion of FIT within 9-15 months of the previous; (ii) yes-no patterns, whereby patients were assigned yes or no in 9-15 month windows; and 3) proportion of time covered (PTC), or the amount of time patients were up-to-date with screening relative to time eligible. RESULTS Repeat FIT varied by measure. Using a prior screeners measure, 15.8% of patients with a normal FIT in round 1 completed repeat FIT in round 2. Repeat FIT was notably higher (52.3%) using PTC. The most common yes-no pattern was YNNN or "one-and-done," and only 9.4% of patients completed two consecutive FITs across all rounds (YYNN). CONCLUSIONS Different measures of repeat FIT yielded a range of estimates, making comparison across studies difficult. Researchers should weigh the advantages and disadvantages of each measure and select the most appropriate to their research question. IMPACT Our study highlights the need for future research of repeat FIT measures that best approximate screening effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin C Murphy
- Department of Population & Data Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Ethan A Halm
- Department of Population & Data Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Celette Sugg Skinner
- Department of Population & Data Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Bijal A Balasubramanian
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas
- Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics, and Environmental Science, UTHealth School of Public Health in Dallas, Dallas, Texas
| | - Amit G Singal
- Department of Population & Data Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
|
33
|
Radadiya D, Gonzalez-Estrada A, Lira-Vera JE, Lizarrga-Torres K, Mahapatra SS, Murguia-Fuentes R, Niezen S, Mohan K, Reddy C, Devani K. Colonoscopy videos on YouTube: Are they a good source of patient education? Endosc Int Open 2020; 8:E598-E606. [PMID: 32355876 PMCID: PMC7165015 DOI: 10.1055/a-1122-8566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2019] [Accepted: 02/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Colonoscopy is an effective tool to prevent colorectal cancer. Social media has emerged as a source of medical information for patients.YouTube (a video sharing website) is the most popular video informative source. Therefore, we aimed to assess the educational quality of colonoscopy videos available on YouTube. Methods We performed a YouTube search using the keyword "colonoscopy" yielded 429 videos, of which 255 met the inclusion criteria. Colonoscopy Data Quality Score (C-DQS) was created to rate the quality of the videos (-10 to +40 points) based on a colonoscopy education video available on the Ameican Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) website. Each video was scored by six blinded reviewers independently using C-DQS. The Global Quality Score (GQS) was used for score validation. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess the similarity of the scores among reviewers. Results Professional societies had the highest number of videos (44.3 %). Videos from professional societies (6.94) and media (6.87) had significantly higher mean C-DQS compared to those from alternative medicine providers (1.19), companies (1.16), and patients (2.60) ( P < 0.05). Mean C-DQS score of videos from healthcare providers (4.40) was not statistically different than other sources. There was a high degree of agreement among reviewers for the videos from all sources (ICC = 0.934; P < 0.001). Discussion YouTube videos are a poor source of information on colonoscopy. Professional societies and media are better sources of quality information for patient education on colonoscopy. The medical community may need to engage actively in enriching the quality of educational material available on YouTube.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dhruvil Radadiya
- Department of Internal Medicine, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, Tennessee, United States
| | - Alexei Gonzalez-Estrada
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, United States
| | - Jorge Emilio Lira-Vera
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hospital Español de México, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City
| | | | - Shayan Sinha Mahapatra
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Florida, United States
| | | | | | - Kaushik Mohan
- University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States
| | - Chakradhar Reddy
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, Tennessee, United States
| | - Kalpit Devani
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, Tennessee, United States
| |
Collapse
|
|
34
|
Norton JC, Boyle JH, Alazmani A, Culmer PR, Neville A. Macro-Scale Tread Patterns for Traction in the Intestine. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2020; 67:3262-3273. [PMID: 32203013 DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2020.2982242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
GOAL Tread patterns are widely used to increase traction on different substrates, with the tread scale, geometry and material being tailored to the application. This work explores the efficacy of using macro-scale tread patterns for a medical application involving a colon substrate - renowned for its low friction characteristics. METHODS Current literature was first summarized before an experimental approach was used, based on a custom test rig with ex vivo porcine colon, to assess different macro-scale tread patterns. Performance was based on increasing traction while avoiding significant trauma. Repeated testing (n = 16) was used to obtain robust results. RESULTS A macro-scale tread pattern can increase the traction coefficient significantly, with a static traction coefficient of 0.74 ± 0.22 and a dynamic traction coefficient of 0.35 ± 0.04 compared to a smooth (on the macro-scale) Control (0.132 ± 0.055 and 0.054 ± 0.015, respectively). Decreasing the scale and spacing between the tread features reduced apparent trauma but also reduced the traction coefficient. CONCLUSION Significant traction can be achieved on colon tissue using a macro-scale tread but a compromise between traction (large feature sizes) and trauma (small feature sizes) may have to be made. SIGNIFICANCE This work provides greater insight into the complex frictional mechanisms of the intestine and gives suggestions for developing functional tread surfaces for a wide range of clinical applications.
Collapse
|
|
35
|
Ecclestone BR, Abbasi S, Bell K, Dinakaran D, Bigras G, Mackey JR, Haji Reza P. Towards virtual biopsies of gastrointestinal tissues using photoacoustic remote sensing microscopy. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2020; 11:1070-1077. [PMID: 33654678 DOI: 10.21037/qims-20-722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Gastrointestinal (GI) tissue biopsies provide critical diagnostic information for a wide variety of conditions such as neoplastic diseases (colorectal, small bowel and stomach cancers) and non-neoplastic diseases (inflammatory disorders, infection, celiac disease). Endoscopic biopsies collect small tissue samples that require resource intensive processing to permit histopathological analysis. Unfortunately, the sparsely collected biopsy samples may fail to capture the pathologic condition because selection of biopsy sites relies on macroscopic superficial tissue features and clinician judgement. Here, we present the first all-optical non-contact label-free non-interferometric photoacoustic microscopy system capable of performing "virtual biopsies". A modular photoacoustic remote sensing (PARS™) architecture is used facilitating imaging of unprocessed tissues providing information similar to conventional histopathological staining techniques. Prospectively this would allow gastroenterologists to assess subcellular tissue morphology in situ when selecting biopsy location. Tested on preserved unstained human and freshly resected murine tissues, the presented PARS microscope rapidly retrieves images of similar area to current biopsies, while maintaining comparable quality to the current standard for histopathological analysis. Additionally, results show the first label free assessment of subsurface cellular morphology in FFPE GI tissue blocks. Clinically relevant features are recovered including cellular details such as lamina propria within colon tissue and cell nuclear structure in resected smooth muscle. Constructed with a modular architecture, this system facilitates the future development of compact imaging heads. The modular PARS system overcomes many of the challenges with imaging unstained thick tissue in situ, representing a significant milestone in the development of a clinical microscope providing virtual biopsy capabilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin R Ecclestone
- PhotoMedicine Labs, Department of Systems Design Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada
| | - Saad Abbasi
- PhotoMedicine Labs, Department of Systems Design Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada
| | - Kevan Bell
- PhotoMedicine Labs, Department of Systems Design Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.,illumiSonics Inc., Department of Systems Design Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada
| | - Deepak Dinakaran
- illumiSonics Inc., Department of Systems Design Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.,Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Gilbert Bigras
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - John R Mackey
- Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Parsin Haji Reza
- PhotoMedicine Labs, Department of Systems Design Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
|
36
|
Grobbee EJ, van der Vlugt M, van Vuuren AJ, Stroobants AK, Mallant-Hent RC, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Bossuyt PMM, Kuipers EJ, Dekker E, Spaander MCW. Diagnostic Yield of One-Time Colonoscopy vs One-Time Flexible Sigmoidoscopy vs Multiple Rounds of Mailed Fecal Immunohistochemical Tests in Colorectal Cancer Screening. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 18:667-675.e1. [PMID: 31419575 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.08.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2019] [Revised: 07/23/2019] [Accepted: 08/02/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS We compared the diagnostic yields of colonoscopy, flexible sigmoidoscopy, and fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. METHODS A total of 30,007 asymptomatic persons, 50-74 years old, were invited for CRC screening in the Netherlands. Participants were assigned to groups that received 4 rounds of FIT (mailed to 15,046 participants), once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy (n = 8407), or once-only colonoscopy (n = 6600). Patients with positive results from the FIT (≥10 μg Hb/g feces) were referred for colonoscopy. Patients who underwent flexible sigmoidoscopy were referred for colonoscopy if they had a polyp of ≥10 mm; adenoma with ≥25% villous histology or high-grade dysplasia; sessile serrated adenoma; ≥3 adenomas; ≥20 hyperplastic polyps; or invasive CRC. The primary outcome was number of advanced neoplasia detected (diagnostic yield) by each test. Secondary outcomes were number of colonoscopies needed to detect advanced neoplasia and number of interval CRCs found during each primary screening test. Patients with interval CRCs were found through linkage with Netherlands Cancer Registry. Advanced neoplasia were defined as CRC, adenomas ≥ 10 mm, adenomas with high-grade dysplasia, or adenomas with a villous component of at least 25%. RESULTS The cumulative participation rate was significantly higher for FIT screening (73%) than for flexible sigmoidoscopy (31%; P < .001) or colonoscopy (24%; P < .001). The percentage of colonoscopies among invitees was higher for colonoscopy (24%) compared to FIT (13%; P < .001) or flexible sigmoidoscopy (3%; P < .001). In the intention to screen analysis, the cumulative diagnostic yield of advanced neoplasia was higher with FIT screening (4.5%; 95% CI 4.2-4.9) than with colonoscopy (2.2%; 95% CI, 1.8-2.6) or flexible sigmoidoscopy (2.3%; 95% CI, 2.0-2.7). In the as-screened analysis, the cumulative yield of advanced neoplasia was higher for endoscopic screening with colonoscopy (9.1%; 95% CI, 7.7-10.7) or flexible sigmoidoscopy (7.4%; 95% CI, 6.5-8.5) than with the FIT (6.1%; 95% CI, 5.7-6.6). All 3 screening strategies detected a similar proportion of patients with CRC. Follow-up times differed for each test (median 8.3 years for FIT and flexible sigmoidoscopy and 5.8 years for colonoscopy). Proportions of patients that developed interval CRC were 0.13% for persons with a negative result from FIT, 0.09% for persons with a negative result from flexible sigmoidoscopy, and 0.01% for persons with a negative result from colonoscopy. CONCLUSIONS Mailed multiple-round FITs detect significantly more advanced neoplasia, on a population level, compared with once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy screening. Significantly fewer colonoscopies are required by individuals screened by multiple FITs. Trialregister.nl numbers: first round, NTR1096; second round and additional invitees, NTR1512; fourth round, NTR5874; COCOS trial NTR1829.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esmée J Grobbee
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Manon van der Vlugt
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anneke J van Vuuren
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - An K Stroobants
- Clinical Chemistry, Academic Medical Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Patrick M M Bossuyt
- Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ernst J Kuipers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Manon C W Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
|
37
|
Abstract
GOALS AND BACKGROUND Surveillance colonoscopy is the most common indication for colonoscopy in older adults, yet factors involved in patient decision-making are poorly defined. We sought to understand general perspectives of older adults toward surveillance colonoscopy. STUDY We conducted 2 in-person, 90-minute semistructured focus groups at a rural, tertiary care, academic facility with a total of 20 English-speaking participants with a history of colon polyps. We also obtained baseline characteristics including information to calculate life expectancy using the Schonberg Index, a validated measure of 5-year and 9-year mortality. RESULTS Participant ages ranged from 75 to 89, 67% were female, and 61% had a life expectancy of ≤9 years. Major common themes included reasons for and against getting a surveillance colonoscopy, and preferences and opinions surrounding discontinuing surveillance. Fear of cancer, trust in the colonoscopy procedure, and provider advice played prominent roles in patient decisions to return for surveillance. Most felt they should make screening decisions with input from providers, and that providers should engage them in these decisions and base recommendations on their patients' personal history and health, not on how old they are or on actuarial data. CONCLUSIONS This small, qualitative study suggests that older adults familiar with surveillance colonoscopy prefer patient-centered decision-making on when to discontinue testing and want support and information from providers when making choices. The evidence also suggests that participants value provider communication and trust their advice. Future work will use this information to create a larger patient survey on attitudes and beliefs toward surveillance colonoscopy.
Collapse
|
|
38
|
Monitoring standards in sedation and analgesia: the odyssey of capnography in sedation for gastroenterology procedures. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2019; 32:453-456. [PMID: 31169549 DOI: 10.1097/aco.0000000000000756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Capnography is an excellent tool for early detection of hypoxemia and apnea in patients undergoing sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy. The current American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) guidelines recommend the use of capnography in any patient undergoing moderate sedation. The purpose of this review was to compile the most recent data available on capnography use in gastrointestinal endoscopy with the focus primarily on the use of capnography in moderate sedation cases. RECENT FINDINGS Recent high-quality studies have evaluated the utility of capnography in low risk patients undergoing moderate sedation and have found no benefit with addition of capnography. SUMMARY Capnography is beneficial when used for patients who are at a higher risk for sedation-related complications. There is no benefit when capnography is used in low risk patients undergoing routine upper endoscopy and colonoscopy under moderate sedation but there is benefit when used in advanced endoscopic procedures that require deeper sedation and have longer procedure times.
Collapse
|
|
39
|
Komaravolu SS, Kim JJ, Singh S, Merchant AM. Colonoscopy utilization in rural areas by general surgeons: An analysis of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. Am J Surg 2019; 218:281-287. [DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2018] [Revised: 02/04/2019] [Accepted: 02/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
|
|
40
|
Bonavina L, Ariani A, Ficano L, Iannuzziello D, Pasquale L, Aragona SE, Drago L, Ciprandi G, On Digestive Disorders ISG. Lactobacillus plantarum LP01, Lactobacillus lactis subspecies cremoris LLC02, and Lactobacillus delbrueckii LDD01) in patients undergoing bowel preparation. ACTA BIO-MEDICA : ATENEI PARMENSIS 2019; 90:13-17. [PMID: 31292421 PMCID: PMC6776169 DOI: 10.23750/abm.v90i7-s.8650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2019] [Accepted: 06/27/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Bowel preparation (BP) for colonoscopy induces significantly changes in gut microbiota and elicit intestinal symptoms. Impaired microbiota causes an intestinal dysbiosis. Consequently, probiotics may counterbalance the disturbed microbiota after BP. The current survey evaluated the efficacy and safety of Abincol®, an oral nutraceutical containing a probiotic mixture with Lactobacillus plantarum LP01 (1 billion of living cells), Lactobacillus lactis subspecies cremoris LLC02 (800 millions of living cells), and Lactobacillus delbrueckii LDD01 (200 millions of living cells), in 2,979 outpatients (1,579 males and 1,400 females, mean age 56 years) undergoing BP. Patients took 1 stick/daily for 4 weeks after colonoscopy. Abincol® significantly diminished the presence and the severity of intestinal symptoms and improved stool form. In conclusion, the current survey suggests that Abincol® may be considered an effective and safe therapeutic option in the management of patients undergoing BP.
Collapse
|
|
41
|
Proposal of high-risk adenoma detection rate as an impactful, complementary quality indicator of colonoscopy. Surg Endosc 2019; 34:325-331. [DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-06770-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2018] [Accepted: 03/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
|
42
|
|
|
43
|
Peter S, Reddy NB, Naseemuddin M, Zaibaq JN, McGwin G, Wilcox CM. Outcomes of use of electromagnetic guidance with responsive insertion technology (RIT) during colonoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Endosc Int Open 2019; 7:E225-E231. [PMID: 30705957 PMCID: PMC6336464 DOI: 10.1055/a-0754-1879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2018] [Accepted: 06/05/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Colonoscopy can be technically challenging and cause discomfort in patients. The integrated Scope Guide assist is built in to show that with its use outcomes are improved during colonoscopy. We aimed to test the usefulness of the Magnetic Scope Guide Assist (ScopeGuide ) with respect to cecal intubation time, and other procedural quality outcomes. Patients and methods We conducted a prospective study of outpatients undergoing elective colonoscopy at the endoscopic units of the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) from March 2016 to July 2016. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 block design to groups that either had standard colonoscopy or Scope-guided colonoscopy. The primary outcome measure was cecal intubation time (CIT). Secondary outcome measures included use of manual pressure, position changes for cecal intubation and sedation requirements. Results Three hundred patients were randomized to either group; standard (n = 150) vs. Scope-guided (n = 150). The mean CIT was not statistically different for the standard and the Scope-guided groups (4.6 vs. 4.3 minutes; P = 0.46). There were also no statistical differences in frequency of manual pressure applied (16.7 % for Scope-guided vs. 19.1 % for standard; P = 0.65) or position changes (11.4 % for scope guided vs. 8.8 % standard; P = 0.56). Sedation requirements showed lesser use of midazolam (3.9 mg vs. 4.7 mg, P = 0.003) in the Scope-guide group, while there was no significant difference in use of fentanyl (fentanyl - 62.1 mg vs. 68.9 mg, P = 0.09 similar between groups, for Scope-guided vs. standard groups, respectively). Adverse events were similar in both groups. Conclusions In patients undergoing routine elective colonoscopy, use of ScopeGuide by experienced colonoscopists did not improve CIT or affect the frequency of ancillary maneuvers. The benefit of this device during training of endoscopists could be considered for further studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shajan Peter
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States,Corresponding author Shajan Peter, MD Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology,Department of MedicineUniversity of Birmingham at AlabamaBirmingham, AL 35294-0007USA+1-205-975-6201
| | - Nipun B. Reddy
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States
| | - Mohammed Naseemuddin
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States
| | - Jenine N. Zaibaq
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States
| | - Gerald McGwin
- Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States
| | - C. Mel Wilcox
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States
| |
Collapse
|
|
44
|
Comparing the Real-World Effectiveness of Competing Colonoscopy Preparations: Results of a Prospective Trial. Am J Gastroenterol 2019; 114:305-314. [PMID: 30730859 PMCID: PMC6551000 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES National societies provide little guidance regarding which colonoscopy bowel preps are best tolerated and most effective; this reflects a lack of comparative effectiveness studies that directly evaluate the available preps in a "real-world" setting. To address this gap, we conducted a prospective, commercially unfunded comparative effectiveness study of currently available bowel preps and measured their impact on bowel cleansing. METHODS We included patients aged ≥18 years, who presented for an outpatient colonoscopy at a large medical center serving more than 70 academic and community-based endoscopists who are free to prescribe the bowel prep of their choice. The primary outcome was bowel cleansing quality as measured by the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale. We performed regression models with random effects on the outcomes to adjust for confounding. RESULTS Approximately 4,339 colonoscopies were performed by 75 endoscopists. Magnesium citrate, MiraLAX with Gatorade, MoviPrep, OsmoPrep, Prepopik/Clenpiq, and Suprep all had significantly higher prep tolerability compared with GoLYTELY (all P < 0.05). For bowel cleansing, Suprep (7.28 ± 1.66; P < 0.001), MoviPrep (7.11 ± 1.62; P = 0.004), and MiraLAX with Gatorade (7.09 ± 1.64; P < 0.001) had higher total Boston Bowel Preparation Scale scores compared with GoLYTELY (6.67 ± 1.87); there were no significant differences among the remaining preps. Split-prep dosing was associated with better cleansing; however, men, opioid and tricyclic antidepressent users, and patients with diabetes and cirrhosis had worse cleansing (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS In this prospective, real-world comparative effectiveness study of available bowel preps, we found that MiraLAX with Gatorade, MoviPrep, and Suprep were prospectively associated with superior tolerability and bowel cleansing.
Collapse
|
|
45
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to test the ability of a commercially available natural language processing (NLP) tool to accurately extract examination quality-related and large polyp information from colonoscopy reports with varying report formats. BACKGROUND Colonoscopy quality reporting often requires manual data abstraction. NLP is another option for extracting information; however, limited data exist on its ability to accurately extract examination quality and polyp findings from unstructured text in colonoscopy reports with different reporting formats. STUDY DESIGN NLP strategies were developed using 500 colonoscopy reports from Kaiser Permanente Northern California and then tested using 300 separate colonoscopy reports that underwent manual chart review. Using findings from manual review as the reference standard, we evaluated the NLP tool's sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and accuracy for identifying colonoscopy examination indication, cecal intubation, bowel preparation adequacy, and polyps ≥10 mm. RESULTS The NLP tool was highly accurate in identifying examination quality-related variables from colonoscopy reports. Compared with manual review, sensitivity for screening indication was 100% (95% confidence interval: 95.3%-100%), PPV was 90.6% (82.3%-95.8%), and accuracy was 98.2% (97.0%-99.4%). For cecal intubation, sensitivity was 99.6% (98.0%-100%), PPV was 100% (98.5%-100%), and accuracy was 99.8% (99.5%-100%). For bowel preparation adequacy, sensitivity was 100% (98.5%-100%), PPV was 100% (98.5%-100%), and accuracy was 100% (100%-100%). For polyp(s) ≥10 mm, sensitivity was 90.5% (69.6%-98.8%), PPV was 100% (82.4%-100%), and accuracy was 95.2% (88.8%-100%). CONCLUSION NLP yielded a high degree of accuracy for identifying examination quality-related and large polyp information from diverse types of colonoscopy reports.
Collapse
|
|
46
|
Peery AF, Crockett SD, Murphy CC, Lund JL, Dellon ES, Williams JL, Jensen ET, Shaheen NJ, Barritt AS, Lieber SR, Kochar B, Barnes EL, Fan YC, Pate V, Galanko J, Baron TH, Sandler RS. Burden and Cost of Gastrointestinal, Liver, and Pancreatic Diseases in the United States: Update 2018. Gastroenterology 2019; 156:254-272.e11. [PMID: 30315778 PMCID: PMC6689327 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.08.063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1066] [Impact Index Per Article: 177.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2018] [Revised: 07/26/2018] [Accepted: 08/05/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Estimates of disease burden can inform national health priorities for research, clinical care, and policy. We aimed to estimate health care use and spending among gastrointestinal (GI) (including luminal, liver, and pancreatic) diseases in the United States. METHODS We estimated health care use and spending based on the most currently available administrative claims from commercial and Medicare Supplemental plans, data from the GI Quality Improvement Consortium Registry, and national databases. RESULTS In 2015, annual health care expenditures for gastrointestinal diseases totaled $135.9 billion. Hepatitis ($23.3 billion), esophageal disorders ($18.1 billion), biliary tract disease ($10.3 billion), abdominal pain ($10.2 billion), and inflammatory bowel disease ($7.2 billion) were the most expensive. Yearly, there were more than 54.4 million ambulatory visits with a primary diagnosis for a GI disease, 3.0 million hospital admissions, and 540,500 all-cause 30-day readmissions. There were 266,600 new cases of GI cancers diagnosed and 144,300 cancer deaths. Each year, there were 97,700 deaths from non-malignant GI diseases. An estimated 11.0 million colonoscopies, 6.1 million upper endoscopies, 313,000 flexible sigmoidoscopies, 178,400 upper endoscopic ultrasound examinations, and 169,500 endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography procedures were performed annually. Among average-risk persons aged 50-75 years who underwent colonoscopy, 34.6% had 1 or more adenomatous polyps, 4.7% had 1 or more advanced adenomatous polyps, and 5.7% had 1 or more serrated polyps removed. CONCLUSIONS GI diseases contribute substantially to health care use in the United States. Total expenditures for GI diseases are $135.9 billion annually-greater than for other common diseases. Expenditures are likely to continue increasing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne F. Peery
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Seth D. Crockett
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | | | - Evan S. Dellon
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | | | | | | | - Sarah R. Lieber
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Bharati Kochar
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Edward L. Barnes
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Y. Claire Fan
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Virginia Pate
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Joseph Galanko
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Todd H. Baron
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | |
Collapse
|
|
47
|
Johnson S, Schultz M, Scholze M, Smith T, Woodfield J, Hammer N. How much force is required to perforate a colon during colonoscopy? An experimental study. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2018; 91:139-148. [PMID: 30579111 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.11.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2018] [Revised: 11/08/2018] [Accepted: 11/23/2018] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Colonoscopy is a commonly-performed procedure to diagnose pathology of the large intestine. Perforation of the colon is a rare but feared complication. It is currently unclear how much force is actually required to cause such injury nor how this is altered in certain diseases. Our aim was to analyze the forces required to perforate the colon in experiments using porcine tissues. METHODS Using 3D printing technology, models of two commercially available colonoscope heads were printed under three configurations: straight (I), 90°- bent (L) and fully bent (U). Samples of porcine colon were assessed with the models and configurations under perpendicular and angular load application and these data compared to the maximum force typically exerted by experienced colonoscopists. RESULTS The force required for perforation was significantly lower for the I compared to the L of the larger colonoscope head configuration under angular loading (14.1 vs. 46.5 N). Similar differences were found for linear stiffness when loaded (I vs. L small when loaded perpendicular: 0.8 vs. 2.4 N/mm, I vs. L large when loaded angled 0.7 vs. 2.1 N/mm). The mode and site of failure varied significantly between the scopes, with delamination of the mucosa/submucosa below the sample (96%) for the I, blunt mucosa/submucosa/muscularis failure adjacent to the loading site (77%) for the L, and failure of all colon layers lateral to the loading site (59%) for the U configuration, respectively. Perpendicular and angulated loading resulted in similar load-deformation values. Maximum forces typically exerted by colonoscopists averaged 13.9-27.9 N, depending on the colonoscope model and head configuration. DISCUSSION The force required for colon perforation varies depending on the type mode of loading and is likely lower than the force an experienced colonoscopist would exert in daily practice. There is a real risk of perforation, especially when the end of the scope is advancing directly into the colonic wall. The given experimental setup allowed to obtain reliable data of the colon in a standardized scenario, forming the basis for further experiments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steve Johnson
- Department of Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand; Gastroenterology Unit, Southern District Health Board, Dunedin Hospital, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Michael Schultz
- Department of Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand; Gastroenterology Unit, Southern District Health Board, Dunedin Hospital, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Mario Scholze
- Department of Anatomy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand Department of Anatomy, Dunedin, New Zealand; Institute of Materials Science and Engineering, Chemnitz University of Technology, Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Troy Smith
- Department of Anatomy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand Department of Anatomy, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - John Woodfield
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Niels Hammer
- Department of Anatomy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand Department of Anatomy, Dunedin, New Zealand; Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, University of Leipzig, Germany; Fraunhofer Institute for Machine Tools and Forming Technology IWU, Dresden, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
|
48
|
Prone or Left for Colonoscopy? A Randomized Controlled Trial of Prone Versus Left-sided Starting Position for Colonoscopy. J Clin Gastroenterol 2018. [PMID: 28644314 DOI: 10.1097/mcg.0000000000000871] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Data have emerged supporting the right-lateral starting position in reducing time to cecum and improving patient comfort for minimally sedated colonoscopy. We aimed to test whether prone starting position results in similar advantages in procedure time and patient tolerability in comparison to traditional left-sided starting position. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a randomized controlled trial in which patients were randomized to begin in either the prone or left-lateral (LL) position. A total of 181 adult patients undergoing scheduled colonoscopy were stratified by age, gender, body mass index, and experience of the endoscopist. Patients were then randomized 1:1 in permuted blocks. The primary outcome measure was time to cecal intubation and secondary outcome measures included patient comfort that was measured by visual analog scale. RESULTS There was no benefit from prone starting positioning over conventional left-sided starting positioning. Further, prone starting position led to an increase in time to reach cecum (701 vs. 511 s; P=0.01). This could be in part explained by an increased time to reach transverse colon in patients positioned prone (332 vs. 258 s; P=0.06). Comfort levels were similar between patients positioned prone and LL (4 vs. 4 visual analog scale; P=0.6) although endoscopists found colonoscopies in which patients started prone more technically challenging than if started LL (5 vs. 4; P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS Prone starting position did not improve time to reach cecum or patient comfort for minimally sedated patients undergoing colonoscopy. The ClinicalTrials.gov identifier is NCT02305706.
Collapse
|
|
49
|
Choi JH, Cha JM, Yoon JY, Kwak MS, Jeon JW, Shin HP. The current capacity and quality of colonoscopy in Korea. Intest Res 2018; 17:119-126. [PMID: 30301340 PMCID: PMC6361025 DOI: 10.5217/ir.2018.00060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2018] [Accepted: 07/09/2018] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background/Aims Little is known for the capacity and quality of colonoscopy, and adherence to colonoscopy surveillance guidelines in Korea. This study aimed to investigate the present and potential colonoscopic capacity, colonoscopic quality, and adherence to colonoscopy surveillance guidelines in Korea. Methods We surveyed representative endoscopists of 72 endoscopy units from June to August 2015, using a 36-item questionnaire regarding colonoscopic capacity, quality, and adherence to colonoscopy surveillance guidelines of each hospitals. Results Among the 62 respondents who answered the questionnaire, 51 respondents were analyzed after exclusion of 11 incomplete answers. Only 1 of 3 of endoscopy units can afford to perform additional colonoscopies in addition to current practice, and the potential maximum number of colonoscopies per week was only 42. The quality of colonoscopy was variable as reporting of quality indicators of colonoscopy were considerably variable (29.4%–94.1%) between endoscopy units. Furthermore, there are substantial gaps in the adherence to colonoscopy surveillance guidelines, as concordance rate for guideline recommendation was less than 50% in most scenarios. Conclusions The potential capacity and quality of colonoscopy in Korea was suboptimal. Considering suboptimal reporting of colonoscopic quality indicators and low adherence rate for colonoscopy surveillance guidelines, quality improvement of colonoscopy should be underlined in Korea.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jae Ho Choi
- Department of Medicine, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Myung Cha
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin Young Yoon
- Department of Medicine, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea.,Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Min Seob Kwak
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jung Won Jeon
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyun Phil Shin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
|
50
|
Development and validation of a deep-learning algorithm for the detection of polyps during colonoscopy. Nat Biomed Eng 2018; 2:741-748. [PMID: 31015647 DOI: 10.1038/s41551-018-0301-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 266] [Impact Index Per Article: 38.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2018] [Accepted: 08/29/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
The detection and removal of precancerous polyps via colonoscopy is the gold standard for the prevention of colon cancer. However, the detection rate of adenomatous polyps can vary significantly among endoscopists. Here, we show that a machine-learning algorithm can detect polyps in clinical colonoscopies, in real time and with high sensitivity and specificity. We developed the deep-learning algorithm by using data from 1,290 patients, and validated it on newly collected 27,113 colonoscopy images from 1,138 patients with at least one detected polyp (per-image-sensitivity, 94.38%; per-image-specificity, 95.92%; area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.984), on a public database of 612 polyp-containing images (per-image-sensitivity, 88.24%), on 138 colonoscopy videos with histologically confirmed polyps (per-image-sensitivity of 91.64%; per-polyp-sensitivity, 100%), and on 54 unaltered full-range colonoscopy videos without polyps (per-image-specificity, 95.40%). By using a multi-threaded processing system, the algorithm can process at least 25 frames per second with a latency of 76.80 ± 5.60 ms in real-time video analysis. The software may aid endoscopists while performing colonoscopies, and help assess differences in polyp and adenoma detection performance among endoscopists.
Collapse
|