1
|
Khan I, Belkovsky M, Gorgun E. The Old: Is There Any Role for Screening Colonoscopy after the Age of 75? The Surgeon's Perspective. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2025; 38:212-218. [PMID: 40291997 PMCID: PMC12020639 DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1787893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2025]
Abstract
Guidelines recommend individualized decision making for screening colonoscopy for colorectal cancer (CRC) in patients after the age of 75 years due to low additional benefits. That should be taken with a grain of salt, as these recommendations are based on expert opinion and simulation models which do not consider (1) the differences in pathogenesis and cancer biology of CRC in elderly; (2) the risks of colonoscopy in this patient population; (3) and the impact of new surgical and nonsurgical therapies for CRC. In this review, our goal is to bring a surgeon's perspective to understand the role of screening colonoscopy in patients older than 75 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Imran Khan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Diseases Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Mikhael Belkovsky
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Diseases Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Emre Gorgun
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Diseases Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wen Y, Li Y, Yang R, Chen Y, Shen Y, Liu Y, Liu X, Zhang B, Li H. Biofunctional coatings and drug-coated stents for restenosis therapy. Mater Today Bio 2024; 29:101259. [PMID: 39391793 PMCID: PMC11465131 DOI: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2024.101259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2024] [Revised: 09/07/2024] [Accepted: 09/17/2024] [Indexed: 10/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Palliative therapy utilizing interventional stents, such as vascular stents, biliary stents, esophageal stents, and other stents, has been a prevalent clinical strategy for treating duct narrowing and partial blockage. However, stent restenosis after implantation usually significantly compromises therapeutic efficacy and patient safety. Clinically, vascular stent restenosis is primarily attributed to endothelial hyperplasia and coagulation, while the risk of biliary stent occlusion is heightened by bacterial adhesion and bile sludge accumulation. Similarly, granulation tissue hyperplasia leads to tracheal stent restenosis. To address these issues, surface modifications of stents are extensively adopted as effective strategies to reduce the probability of restenosis and extend their functional lifespan. Applying coatings is one of the technical routes involving a complex selection of materials, drug loading capacities, release rates, and other factors. This paper provides an extensive overview of state of the art drug-coated stents, addressing both challenges and future prospects in this domain. We aim to contribute positively to the ongoing development and potential clinical applications of drug-coated stents in interventional therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanghui Wen
- Departments of General Surgery, Ningbo No.2 Hospital, Ningbo, 315010, China
| | - Yihuan Li
- Zhejiang Engineering Research Center for Biomedical Materials, Laboratory of Advanced Theranostic Materials and Technology, Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo, 315201, China
- Zhejiang-Japan Joint Laboratory for Antibacterial and Antifouling Technology, Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo, 315201, China
| | - Rui Yang
- Zhejiang Engineering Research Center for Biomedical Materials, Laboratory of Advanced Theranostic Materials and Technology, Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo, 315201, China
- Zhejiang-Japan Joint Laboratory for Antibacterial and Antifouling Technology, Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo, 315201, China
| | - Yunjie Chen
- Departments of General Surgery, Ningbo No.2 Hospital, Ningbo, 315010, China
| | - Yan Shen
- Zhejiang Engineering Research Center for Biomedical Materials, Laboratory of Advanced Theranostic Materials and Technology, Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo, 315201, China
- Zhejiang-Japan Joint Laboratory for Antibacterial and Antifouling Technology, Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo, 315201, China
| | - Yi Liu
- Zhejiang Engineering Research Center for Biomedical Materials, Laboratory of Advanced Theranostic Materials and Technology, Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo, 315201, China
- Zhejiang-Japan Joint Laboratory for Antibacterial and Antifouling Technology, Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo, 315201, China
| | - Xiaomei Liu
- Zhejiang Engineering Research Center for Biomedical Materials, Laboratory of Advanced Theranostic Materials and Technology, Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo, 315201, China
- Zhejiang-Japan Joint Laboratory for Antibacterial and Antifouling Technology, Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo, 315201, China
| | - Botao Zhang
- Zhejiang Engineering Research Center for Biomedical Materials, Laboratory of Advanced Theranostic Materials and Technology, Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo, 315201, China
- Zhejiang-Japan Joint Laboratory for Antibacterial and Antifouling Technology, Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo, 315201, China
| | - Hua Li
- Zhejiang Engineering Research Center for Biomedical Materials, Laboratory of Advanced Theranostic Materials and Technology, Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo, 315201, China
- Zhejiang-Japan Joint Laboratory for Antibacterial and Antifouling Technology, Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo, 315201, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sanderfer VC, Ross S, Matthews B, Schiffern L, Yang H, Jang MH, Reinke C. Costs in Colectomy Episodes of Care: Opportunities to Prevent Emergency Operations and Decrease Costs. J Surg Res 2024; 300:79-86. [PMID: 38796904 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.04.073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Revised: 04/10/2024] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Payment structured around Episodes of Care is a method for incentivizing decreased care utilization after major procedures. We examined Major Bowel Episodes of Care (MB-EoC)-the focus among general surgery procedures-within a large health system to determine the contribution of emergency bowel surgery to higher costs of care. METHODS Adult MB-EoC cases from July 2018 to June 2021 were reviewed for 90-d costs, examining patient age, insurance, diagnosis, cost of care, and contributors to cost. For patients aged ≥45 y who had nonelective care for colon cancer, incidence of prior screening colonoscopy was examined. RESULTS We identified 1292 colectomy cases. Mean age was 65 y. Of these patients, 90% had Medicare/commercial insurance. Colon cancer comprised 41% of primary diagnoses. Twenty-eight percent of cases were nonelective, more likely to have Medicaid/underinsured (21% versus 7%, P < 0.001), and had higher utilization of postdischarge cost-drivers. Ninety-day EoC per case cost was 66% higher for emergent versus elective cases. Of eligible emergency cancer cases, 43% (40/93) had undergone prior colonoscopy within 10 y. For patients with colon cancer, 90-d EoC per case was 39% higher for emergent versus elective cases. CONCLUSIONS Emergency MB-EoC cases disproportionally contribute to higher 90-d care utilization and costs. Efforts to increase screening colonoscopy in appropriate populations may have a substantial impact on MB-EoC costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Samuel Ross
- Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Brent Matthews
- Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Lynnette Schiffern
- Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Hongmei Yang
- Atrium Health, Information and Analytics Services, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Min Hyuk Jang
- Academic Medical Education, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Caroline Reinke
- Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yu N, Lin S, Wang X, Hu G, Xie R, Que Z, Lai R, Xu D. Endoscopic obstruction predominantly occurs in right-side colon cancer and endoscopic obstruction with tumor size ≤ 5 cm seems poor prognosis in colorectal cancer. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1415345. [PMID: 38947895 PMCID: PMC11211365 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1415345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2024] [Accepted: 05/23/2024] [Indexed: 07/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Endoscopic obstruction (eOB) is associated with a poor prognosis in colorectal cancer (CRC). Our study aimed to investigate the association between tumor location and eOB, as well as the prognostic differences among non-endoscopic obstruction (N-eOB), eOB with tumor size ≤ 5 cm, and eOB with tumor size > 5 cm in non-elderly patients. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the clinicopathological variables of 230 patients with CRC who underwent curative surgery. The multivariable logistic regression model was used to identify risk factors for eOB. The association between eOB with tumor size ≤ 5 cm and disease-free survival (DFS) was evaluated using multivariate cox regression analysis. Results A total of 87 patients had eOB while 143 had N-eOB. In multivariate analysis, preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (p = 0.014), tumor size (p = 0.010), tumor location (left-side colon; p = 0.033; rectum; p < 0.001), and pT stage (T3, p = 0.009; T4, p < 0.001) were significant factors of eOB. The DFS rate for eOB with tumor size ≤ 5 cm was significantly lower (p < 0.001) in survival analysis. The eOB with tumor size ≤ 5 cm (p = 0.012) was an unfavorable independent factor for DFS. Conclusions The patients with eOB were significantly associated with right-side colon cancer as opposed to left-side colon cancer and rectal cancer. The eOB with tumor size ≤ 5 cm was an independent poor prognostic factor. Further studies are needed to target these high-risk groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nong Yu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Longyan First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Longyan, China
| | - Shuangming Lin
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Longyan First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Longyan, China
| | - Xiaojie Wang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Guoxin Hu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Longyan First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Longyan, China
| | - Run Xie
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Longyan First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Longyan, China
| | - Zhipeng Que
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Longyan First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Longyan, China
| | - Runsheng Lai
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Longyan First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Longyan, China
| | - Dongbo Xu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Longyan First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Longyan, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Keogh C, Moore J, Cossio D, Smith N, Clark DA. Obstructing colorectal cancer: a population-based review of colonic stenting in Queensland, Australia. Ann Coloproctol 2024; 40:268-275. [PMID: 38946096 PMCID: PMC11362761 DOI: 10.3393/ac.2023.00640.0091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Revised: 10/06/2023] [Accepted: 10/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/02/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Stenting is a useful treatment option for malignant colonic obstruction, but its role remains unclear. This study was designed to establish how stents have been used in Queensland, Australia, and to review outcomes. METHODS Patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer in Queensland from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2014, who underwent colonic stent insertion were reviewed. Primary outcomes of 5-year survival, 30-day mortality, and overall length of survival were calculated. The secondary outcomes included patient and tumor factors, and stoma rates. RESULTS In total, 319 patients were included, and distant metastases were identified in 183 patients (57.4%). The 30-day mortality rate was 6.6% (n=21), and the 5-year survival was 11.9% (n=38). Median survival was 11 months (interquartile range, 4-27 months). A further operation (hazard ratio [HR], 0.19; P<0.001) and chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy (HR, 0.718; P=0.046) reduced the risk of 5-year mortality. The presence of distant metastases (HR, 2.052; P<0.001) and a comorbidity score of 3 or more (HR, 1.572; P=0.20) increased mortality. Surgery was associated with a reduced risk of mortality even in patients with metastatic disease (HR, 0.14; P<0.001). Twenty-two patients (6.9%) ended the study period with a stoma. CONCLUSION Colorectal stenting was used in Queensland in several diverse scenarios, in both localized and metastatic disease. Surgery had a survival advantage, even in patients with metastatic disease. There was no survival difference according to whether patients were socioeconomically disadvantaged, diagnosed in a major city or not, or treated at private or public hospitals. Stenting proved a valid treatment option with low stoma rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cian Keogh
- Department of Surgery, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Julie Moore
- Cancer Alliance Queensland, Woolloongabba, QLD, Australia
| | - Danica Cossio
- Cancer Alliance Queensland, Woolloongabba, QLD, Australia
| | - Nick Smith
- Department of Surgery, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - David A. Clark
- Department of Surgery, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Cancer Alliance Queensland, Woolloongabba, QLD, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Deresse T, Tesfahun E, Gebreegziabher ZA, Bogale M, Alemayehu D, Dessalegn M, Kifleyohans T, Eskandar G. Perioperative Adverse Outcome and Its Predictors After Emergency Laparotomy Among Sigmoid Volvulus Patients: Retrospective Follow-Up Study. Open Access Emerg Med 2023; 15:383-392. [PMID: 37876607 PMCID: PMC10591608 DOI: 10.2147/oaem.s430193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Acute sigmoid volvulus is a surgical emergency with closed-loop obstruction of the colon that often requires emergency laparotomy, which is associated with a multitude of post-operative complications. Although sigmoid volvulus is the main cause of intestinal obstruction in Ethiopia, local studies of its management outcomes are limited. Objective To assess the magnitude and predictors of adverse perioperative outcomes of emergency laparotomy for acute sigmoid volvulus in the Debre Markos Comprehensive Specialized Hospital (DMCSH), Amhara region, Ethiopia in 2023. Methods This was a retrospective follow-up study. Descriptive statistics were used to measure perioperative outcomes and other study variables. Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify the predictors of adverse surgical outcomes. Associations were considered significant at p < 0.05 (95% confidence interval). Results In total, 170 study participants were enrolled, with a response rate of 91.4%. Forty-nine patients (28.8%) developed perioperative adverse outcomes. Pneumonia (29 patients, 28.1%), surgical site infection (19 patients, 18.4%), and wound dehiscence (10 patients, 9.7%) were the most common complications. Pre-operative shock [AOR: 3.87 (95% CI: (1.22, 12.28))], pus or fecal matter contamination of the peritoneum [AOR: 4.43 (95% CI: (1.35, 14.47)], and a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score [AOR: 2.37 (95% CI: (1.05, 5.34))] were identified as predictors of perioperative adverse events. Conclusion The perioperative adverse outcomes in this study were higher than those reported in Ethiopian national and global reports following emergency laparotomies. Hypotension at presentation, pus and/or fecal matter contamination of the peritoneum, and higher ASA scores are strong predictors of increased perioperative adverse outcomes. Therefore, healthcare providers and institutions involved in the delivery of emergency surgical care should emphasize the importance of early surgical intervention, adequate resuscitation, and patient monitoring to improve perioperative outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tilahun Deresse
- Department of Surgery, Debre Berhan University, Debre Berhan, Ethiopia
| | - Esubalew Tesfahun
- Department of Public Health, Debre Berhan University, Debre Berhan, Ethiopia
| | | | - Mandante Bogale
- Department of Surgery, Debre Markos University, Debre Markos, Ethiopia
| | - Dawit Alemayehu
- Department of Surgery, Debre Markos University, Debre Markos, Ethiopia
| | - Megbar Dessalegn
- Department of Surgery, Debre Markos University, Debre Markos, Ethiopia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Boeding JRE, Elferink MAG, Tanis PJ, de Wilt JHW, Gobardhan PD, Verhoef C, Schreinemakers JMJ. Surgical treatment and overall survival in patients with right-sided obstructing colon cancer-a nationwide retrospective cohort study. Int J Colorectal Dis 2023; 38:248. [PMID: 37796315 PMCID: PMC10556181 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-023-04541-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to compare baseline characteristics, 90-day mortality and overall survival (OS) between patients with obstructing and non-obstructing right-sided colon cancer at a national level. METHODS All patients who underwent resection for right-sided colon cancer between January 2015 and December 2016 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry and stratified for obstruction. Primary outcome was 5-year OS after excluding 90-day mortality as assessed by the Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox regression analysis. RESULTS A total of 525 patients (7%) with obstructing and 6891 patients (93%) with non-obstructing right-sided colon cancer were included. Patients with right-sided obstructing colon cancer (OCC) were older and had more often transverse tumour location, and the pathological T and N stage was more advanced than in those without obstruction (p < 0.001). The 90-day mortality in patients with right-sided OCC was higher compared to that in patients with non-obstructing colon cancer: 10% versus 3%, respectively (p < 0.001). The 5-year OS of those surviving 90 days postoperatively was 42% in patients with OCC versus 73% in patients with non-obstructing colon cancer, respectively (p < 0.001). Worse 5-year OS was found in patients with right-sided OCC for all stages. Obstruction was an independent risk factor for decreased OS in right-sided colon cancer (HR 1.79, 95% CI 1.57-2.03). CONCLUSION In addition to increased risk of postoperative mortality, a stage-independent worse 5-year OS after excluding 90-day mortality was found in patients with right-sided OCC compared to patients without obstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeske R E Boeding
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands.
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Marloes A G Elferink
- Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter J Tanis
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes H W de Wilt
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Park YE, Hong SM, Lee SB, Lee HS, Baek DH, Cha R, Lee JY, Kim TO, Lee JH. Outcomes according to treatment modalities as a bridge to curative surgery for malignant obstruction of the proximal colon: stent versus stoma. Korean J Intern Med 2023; 38:186-194. [PMID: 36587935 PMCID: PMC9993095 DOI: 10.3904/kjim.2022.281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS The optimal treatment for acute malignant obstruction of the proximal colon (MOPC, proximal to the splenic flexure) remains challenging. Emergency resection, the traditional modality for MOPC, has shown significantly high mortality and morbidity rates, according to recent studies. This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of stent vs stoma as a bridge to curative surgery for MOPC. METHODS This retrospective cohort study included 72 patients who underwent endoscopic placement of a self-expanding metallic stent (SEMS) or loop ileostomy for MOPC at six referral centers between January 2011 and July 2021. Clinical and pathological characteristics, procedure-related complications, and long-term mortality rates after curative surgery were analyzed. RESULTS During a mean follow-up period of 32 months, 30 patients (41.7%) underwent ileostomy preferentially for more proximal cancer, complete obstruction, and advanced tumor stage compared to the SEMS group. No difference was found in procedure-related complications, but five deaths were observed after ileostomy. Survival analysis for 5-year mortality after curative surgery showed no significant difference between the bridge modalities (log-rank p = 0.253). CONCLUSION In this study, SEMS as a bridge to surgery showed relatively safe results in terms of post-procedural mortality. However, these results should be considered when performing ileostomy in patients with more advanced malignant obstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong Eun Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital, College of Medicine, Inje University, Busan,
Korea
| | - Seung Min Hong
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan,
Korea
| | - Seung Bum Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan,
Korea
| | - Hong Sub Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, College of Medicine, Inje University, Busan,
Korea
| | - Dong Hoon Baek
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan,
Korea
| | - Rari Cha
- Department of Internal Medicine, Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, Changwon,
Korea
| | - Jong Yoon Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan,
Korea
| | - Tae Oh Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital, College of Medicine, Inje University, Busan,
Korea
| | - Jong Hoon Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan,
Korea
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Chok AY, Zhao Y, Lim HJ, Ng YYR, Tan EJKW. Stenting as a bridge to surgery in obstructing colon cancer: Long-term recurrence pattern and competing risk of mortality. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 15:64-76. [PMID: 36925648 PMCID: PMC10011892 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v15.i2.64] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Revised: 12/28/2022] [Accepted: 01/10/2023] [Indexed: 02/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stenting as a bridge to curative surgery (SBTS) for obstructing colon cancer (OCC) has been associated with possibly worse oncological outcomes.
AIM To evaluate the recurrence patterns, survival outcomes, and colorectal cancer (CRC)-specific death in patients undergoing SBTS for OCC.
METHODS Data from 62 patients undergoing SBTS at a single tertiary centre over ten years between 2007 and 2016 were retrospectively examined. Primary outcomes were recurrence patterns, overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and CRC-specific death. OS and CSS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier curves. Competing risk analysis with cumulative incidence function (CIF) was used to estimate CRC-specific mortality with other cause-specific death as a competing event. Fine-Gray regressions were performed to determine prognostic factors of CRC-specific death. Univariate and multivariate subdistribution hazard ratios and their corresponding Wald test P values were calculated.
RESULTS 28 patients (45.2%) developed metastases after a median period of 16 mo. Among the 18 patients with single-site metastases: Four had lung-only metastases (14.3%), four had liver-only metastases (14.3%), and 10 had peritoneum-only metastases (35.7%), while 10 patients had two or more sites of metastatic disease (35.7%). The peritoneum was the most prevalent (60.7%) site of metastatic involvement (17/28). The median follow-up duration was 46 mo. 26 (41.9%) of the 62 patients died, of which 16 (61.5%) were CRC-specific deaths and 10 (38.5%) were deaths owing to other causes. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS probabilities were 88%, 74%, and 59%; 1-, 3-, and 5-year CSS probabilities were 97%, 83%, and 67%. The highest CIF for CRC-specific death at 60 mo was liver-only recurrence (0.69). Liver-only recurrence, peritoneum-only recurrence, and two or more recurrence sites were predictive of CRC-specific death.
CONCLUSION The peritoneum was the most common metastatic site among patients undergoing SBTS. Liver-only recurrence, peritoneum-only recurrence, and two or more recurrence sites were predictors of CRC-specific death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aik Yong Chok
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore 169608, Singapore
| | - Yun Zhao
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore 169608, Singapore
- Department of Group Analytics, Singapore Health Services, Singapore 168582, Singapore
| | - Hui Jun Lim
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore 169608, Singapore
| | - Yvonne Ying Ru Ng
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore 169608, Singapore
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Chen S, Zhou S, Lin Y, Xue W, Huang Z, Yu J, Yu Z, Chen S. Self-Expandable Metal Stent as a Bridge to Surgery for Left-Sided Acute Malignant Colorectal Obstruction: Optimal Timing for Elective Surgery. COMPUTATIONAL AND MATHEMATICAL METHODS IN MEDICINE 2022; 2022:6015729. [PMID: 36017151 PMCID: PMC9398836 DOI: 10.1155/2022/6015729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2022] [Revised: 07/25/2022] [Accepted: 07/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This randomized, single-center, retrospective, comparative cohort study is aimed at investigating the optimal time interval from self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) placement to surgery and potential risk factors for complications in patients with acute malignant colorectal obstruction. METHODS A total of 64 patients with left-sided acute malignant colorectal obstruction treated with SEMS placement and subsequent surgery between January 2013 and September 2020 were enrolled and allocated to a case group (SEMS placing time ≤ 14 days; n = 19 patients) and a control group (SEMS placing time > 14 days; n = 45 patients). The primary outcome was the difference in baseline information, patients' conditions during surgery, and postoperative conditions between the two groups. The secondary outcome included potential risk factors of postoperative complications. The propensity score matching (PSM) and super learner (SL) methods were used to eliminate multiple confounding factors of baseline data. A cohort of 21 samples was used for external validation, comprising 6 cases and 15 controls. RESULTS A significant difference was observed between the two groups in intraoperative blood loss (P = 0.009), postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.002), postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grading ≥ II) (P < 0.001), stoma creation (P < 0.001), and primary anastomosis (P < 0.001). After a 1 : 3 PSM analysis, no statistically significant differences between eight confounding variables of the two groups were observed (P > 0.05). Caliper set as 0.2 multiple logistic regression analysis showed that the potential risk factor for postoperative complications was SEMS placing time (RR = 0.109, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.028-0.433; P = 0.002), indicating that SEMS placing time > 14 days was an independent risk factor for postoperative complications in bridge-to-surgery (BTS) setting. The area under the AUC curve was 76.7% and validated using the validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS Long duration of SEMS placement (>14 days) may not influence surgical difficulty but could increase the risk of postoperative complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuxian Chen
- Department of Digestive Disease, First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Guangdong Province 515061, China
| | - Sisi Zhou
- Department of Digestive Disease, First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Guangdong Province 515061, China
| | - Yiting Lin
- Department of Digestive Disease, First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Guangdong Province 515061, China
| | - Wenwen Xue
- Department of Digestive Disease, First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Guangdong Province 515061, China
| | - Zeyu Huang
- Department of Digestive Disease, First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Guangdong Province 515061, China
| | - Jing Yu
- Department of Digestive Disease, First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Guangdong Province 515061, China
| | - Zefeng Yu
- Department of Digestive Disease, First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Guangdong Province 515061, China
| | - Suzuan Chen
- Department of Digestive Disease, First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Guangdong Province 515061, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Levy L, Smiley A, Latifi R. Adult and Elderly Risk Factors of Mortality in 23,614 Emergently Admitted Patients with Rectal or Rectosigmoid Junction Malignancy. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19159203. [PMID: 35954556 PMCID: PMC9368534 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19159203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2022] [Revised: 07/24/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Background: Colorectal cancer, among which are malignant neoplasms of the rectum and rectosigmoid junction, is the fourth most common cancer cause of death globally. The goal of this study was to evaluate independent predictors of in-hospital mortality in adult and elderly patients undergoing emergency admission for malignant neoplasm of the rectum and rectosigmoid junction. Methods: Demographic and clinical data were obtained from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS), 2005−2014, to evaluate adult (age 18−64 years) and elderly (65+ years) patients with malignant neoplasm of the rectum and rectosigmoid junction who underwent emergency surgery. A multivariable logistic regression model with backward elimination process was used to identify the association of predictors and in-hospital mortality. Results: A total of 10,918 non-elderly adult and 12,696 elderly patients were included in this study. Their mean (standard deviation (SD)) age was 53 (8.5) and 77.5 (8) years, respectively. The odds ratios (95% confidence interval, P-value) of some of the pertinent risk factors for mortality for operated adults were 1.04 for time to operation (95%CI: 1.02−1.07, p < 0.001), 2.83 for respiratory diseases (95%CI: 2.02−3.98), and 1.93 for cardiac disease (95%CI: 1.39−2.70), among others. Hospital length of stay was a significant risk factor as well for elderly patients—OR: 1.02 (95%CI: 1.01−1.03, p = 0.002). Conclusions: In adult patients who underwent an operation, time to operation, respiratory diseases, and cardiac disease were some of the main risk factors of mortality. In patients who did not undergo a surgical procedure, malignant neoplasm of the rectosigmoid junction, respiratory disease, and fluid and electrolyte disorders were risk factors of mortality. In this patient group, hospital length of stay was only significant for elderly patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lior Levy
- School of Medicine, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY 10595, USA;
| | - Abbas Smiley
- Westchester Medical Center, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY 10595, USA;
| | - Rifat Latifi
- Department of Surgery, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Plá Sánchez P, Muñoz Rodríguez J, Bennazar Nin R, López Monclús J, Caselles A. Cecal pneumatosis: Is it a contraindication for an endoscopic self expandable stent placement in patients with obstructive colorectal carcinoma? Cir Esp 2022:S2173-5077(22)00200-9. [PMID: 35728763 DOI: 10.1016/j.cireng.2022.06.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Pau Plá Sánchez
- General and Digestive Surgery Department, Puerta de Hierro - Majadahonda University Hospital, Spain.
| | - Joaquín Muñoz Rodríguez
- General and Digestive Surgery Department, Puerta de Hierro - Majadahonda University Hospital, Spain
| | - Rosaura Bennazar Nin
- General and Digestive Surgery Department, Puerta de Hierro - Majadahonda University Hospital, Spain
| | - Javier López Monclús
- General and Digestive Surgery Department, Puerta de Hierro - Majadahonda University Hospital, Spain
| | - Artés Caselles
- General and Digestive Surgery Department, Puerta de Hierro - Majadahonda University Hospital, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kanaka S, Matsuda A, Yamada T, Ohta R, Sonoda H, Shinji S, Takahashi G, Iwai T, Takeda K, Ueda K, Kuriyama S, Miyasaka T, Yoshida H. Colonic stent as a bridge to surgery versus emergency resection for right-sided malignant large bowel obstruction: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:2760-2770. [PMID: 35113211 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09071-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2021] [Accepted: 01/20/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preoperative colonic stenting for malignant large bowel obstruction (MLBO), also called bridge to surgery (BTS), is considered a great substitute treatment for emergency resection (ER) in the left-sided colon. However, its efficacy in the right-sided colon remains controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the postoperative short-term outcomes between BTS and ER for right-sided MLBO. METHODS A comprehensive electronic literature search throughout December 2020 was performed to identify studies comparing short-term outcomes between BTS and ER for right-side MLBO. The main outcome measures were postoperative complications and mortality rates. A meta-analysis was performed using a fixed-effect or a random-effect method to calculate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). RESULTS Seven studies were included in this meta-analysis, comprising 5136 patients, of whom 1662 (32.4%) underwent BTS and 3474 (67.6%) underwent ER. This meta-analysis demonstrated that BTS resulted in reductions in postoperative complications (OR = 0.78; 95% CI: 0.66-0.92) and mortality (OR = 0.51; 95% CI: 0.28-0.92) than ER. CONCLUSION The results of this meta-analysis indicate that BTS for right-sided MLBO confers preferable short-term outcomes as well as for left-sided. This suggests that BTS results in a reduction of postoperative complications and mortality for right-sided MLBO than ER.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shintaro Kanaka
- Department of Gastrointestinal Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| | - Akihisa Matsuda
- Department of Gastrointestinal Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan.
| | - Takeshi Yamada
- Department of Gastrointestinal Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| | - Ryo Ohta
- Department of Gastrointestinal Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| | - Hiromichi Sonoda
- Department of Gastrointestinal Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| | - Seiichi Shinji
- Department of Gastrointestinal Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| | - Goro Takahashi
- Department of Gastrointestinal Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| | - Takuma Iwai
- Department of Gastrointestinal Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| | - Kohki Takeda
- Department of Gastrointestinal Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| | - Koji Ueda
- Department of Gastrointestinal Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| | - Sho Kuriyama
- Department of Gastrointestinal Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| | - Toshimitsu Miyasaka
- Department of Gastrointestinal Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Yoshida
- Department of Gastrointestinal Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Konopke R, Schubert J, Stöltzing O, Thomas T, Kersting S, Denz A. Predictive factors of early outcome after palliative surgery for colorectal carcinoma. Innov Surg Sci 2021; 5:91-103. [PMID: 34966831 PMCID: PMC8668025 DOI: 10.1515/iss-2020-0018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2020] [Accepted: 09/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives A significant number of patients with colorectal cancer are presented with various conditions requiring surgery in an oncologically palliative setting. We performed this study to identify risk factors for early outcome after surgery to facilitate the decision-making process for therapy in a palliative disease. Methods We performed a retrospective chart review of 142 patients who underwent palliative surgery due to locally advanced, complicated, or advanced metastatic colorectal carcinoma between January 2010 and April 2018 at the "Elbland" Medical Center Riesa. We performed a logistic regression analysis of 43 factors to identify independent predictors for complications and mortality. Results Surgery included resections with primary anastomosis (n=31; 21.8%) or discontinuous resections with colostomy (n=38; 26.8%), internal bypasses (n=27; 19.0%) and stoma formation only (n=46; 32.4%). The median length of hospitalization was 12 days (2-53 days), in-hospital morbidity was 50.0% and the mortality rate was 18.3%. Independent risk factors of in-hospital morbidity were age (HR: 1.5, p=0.046) and various comorbidities of the patients [obesity (HR: 1.8, p=0.036), renal failure (HR: 1.6, p=0.040), diabetes (HR: 1.6, p=0.032), alcohol abuse (HR: 1.3, p=0.023)] as well as lung metastases (HR: 1.6, p=0.041). Arteriosclerosis (HR: 1.4; p=0.045) and arterial hypertension (HR: 1.4, p=0.042) were independent risk factors for medical complications in multivariate analysis. None of the analyzed factors predicted the surgical morbidity after the palliative procedures. Emergency surgery (HR: 10.2, p=0.019), intestinal obstruction (HR: 9.2, p=0.006) and ascites (HR: 5.0, p=0.034) were multivariate significant parameters of in-hospital mortality. Conclusions Palliatively treated patients with colorectal cancer undergoing surgery show high rates of morbidity and mortality after surgery. In this retrospective chart review, independent risk factors for morbidity and in-hospital mortality were identified that are similar to patients in curative care. An adequate selection of patients before palliative operation should lead to a better outcome after surgery. Especially in patients with intestinal obstruction and ascites scheduled for emergency surgery, every effort should be made to convey these patients to elective surgery by interventional therapy, such as a stent or minimally invasive stoma formation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ralf Konopke
- Elblandklinikum Riesa, Zentrum für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie Riesa-Meißen, Meissen, Germany
| | - Jörg Schubert
- Elblandklinikum Riesa, Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Meissen, Germany
| | - Oliver Stöltzing
- Elblandklinikum Riesa, Zentrum für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie Riesa-Meißen, Meissen, Germany
| | - Tina Thomas
- Universitätsklinikum Dresden, Medizinische Klinik I, Dresden, Germany
| | - Stephan Kersting
- Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemeine Chirurgie, Viszeral-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Axel Denz
- Chirurgische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Shinde RS, Gupta A, Patil P, Desouza A, Ostwal V, Engineer R, Saklani A. Impact of Lumen Occlusion on Outcomes in Locally Advanced Rectal Adenocarcinoma. Indian J Surg 2021; 83:1401-1406. [DOI: 10.1007/s12262-020-02678-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2020] [Accepted: 11/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
|
16
|
Bass GA, Forssten M, Pourlotfi A, Ahl Hulme R, Cao Y, Matthiessen P, Mohseni S. Cardiac risk stratification in emergency resection for colonic tumours. BJS Open 2021; 5:6316195. [PMID: 34228103 PMCID: PMC8259498 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2021] [Accepted: 05/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Despite advances in perioperative care, the postoperative mortality rate after emergency oncological colonic resection remains high. Risk stratification may allow targeted perioperative optimization and cardiac risk stratification. This study aimed to test the hypothesis that the Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI), a user-friendly tool, could identify patients who would benefit most from perioperative cardiac risk mitigation. Methods Patients who underwent emergency resection for colonic cancer from 2007 to 2017 and registered in the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry (SCRCR) were analysed retrospectively. These patients were cross-referenced by social security number to the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare data set, a government registry of mortality, and co-morbidity data. RCRI scores were calculated for each patient and correlated with 90-day postoperative mortality risk, using Poisson regression with robust error of variance. Results Some 5703 patients met the study inclusion criteria. A linear increase in crude 90-day postoperative mortality was detected with increasing RCRI score (37.3 versus 11.3 per cent for RCRI 4 or more versus RCRI 1; P < 0.001). The adjusted 90-day all-cause mortality risk was also significantly increased (RCRI 4 or more versus RCRI 1: adjusted incidence rate ratio 2.07, 95 per cent c.i. 1.49 to 2.89; P < 0.001). Conclusion This study documented an association between increasing cardiac risk and 90-day postoperative mortality. Those undergoing emergency colorectal surgery for cancer with a raised RCRI score should be considered high-risk patients who would most likely benefit from enhanced postoperative monitoring and critical care expertise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G A Bass
- School of Medical Sciences, Orebro University, Orebro, Sweden.,Division of Traumatology, Surgical Critical Care and Emergency Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Penn Presbyterian Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - M Forssten
- School of Medical Sciences, Orebro University, Orebro, Sweden.,Division of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Department of Surgery, Orebro University Hospital, Orebro, Sweden
| | - A Pourlotfi
- School of Medical Sciences, Orebro University, Orebro, Sweden.,Division of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Department of Surgery, Orebro University Hospital, Orebro, Sweden
| | - R Ahl Hulme
- School of Medical Sciences, Orebro University, Orebro, Sweden.,Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Division of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Department of Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Y Cao
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medical Sciences, Orebro University, Orebro, Sweden
| | - P Matthiessen
- School of Medical Sciences, Orebro University, Orebro, Sweden.,Division of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Department of Surgery, Orebro University Hospital, Orebro, Sweden
| | - S Mohseni
- School of Medical Sciences, Orebro University, Orebro, Sweden.,Division of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Department of Surgery, Orebro University Hospital, Orebro, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Axmarker T, Leffler M, Lepsenyi M, Thorlacius H, Syk I. Long-term survival after self-expanding metallic stent or stoma decompression as bridge to surgery in acute malignant large bowel obstruction. BJS Open 2021; 5:6242413. [PMID: 33880530 PMCID: PMC8058149 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2020] [Accepted: 02/11/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim Self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS) as bridge to surgery have been questioned due to the fear of perforation and tumour spread. This study aimed to compare SEMS and stoma as bridge to surgery in acute malignant large bowel obstruction in the Swedish population. Method Medical records of patients identified via the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Register 2007–2009 were collected and scrutinized. The inclusion criterion was decompression intended as bridge to surgery due to acute malignant large bowel obstruction. Patients who underwent decompression for other causes or had bowel perforation were excluded. Primary endpoints were 5-year overall survival and 3-year disease-free survival. Secondary endpoints were 30-day morbidity and mortality rates. Results A total of 196 patients fulfilled the inclusion criterion (SEMS, 71, and stoma, 125 patients). There was no significant difference in sex, age, ASA score, TNM stage and adjuvant chemotherapy between the SEMS and stoma groups. No patient was treated with biological agents. Five-year overall survival was comparable in SEMS, 56 per cent (40 patients), and stoma groups, 48 per cent (60 patients), P = 0.260. Likewise, 3-year disease-free survival did not differ statistically significant, SEMS 73 per cent (43 of 59 patients), stoma 65 per cent (62 of 95 patients), P = 0.32. In the SEMS group, 1.4 per cent (one patient) did not fulfil resection surgery compared to 8.8 per cent (11 patients) in the stoma group (P = 0.040). Postoperative complication and 30-day postoperative mortality rates did not differ, whereas the duration of hospital stay and proportion of permanent stoma were lower in the SEMS group. Conclusion This nationwide registry-based study showed that long-term survival in patients with either SEMS or stoma as bridge to surgery in acute malignant large bowel obstruction were comparable. SEMS were associated with a lower rate of permanent stoma, higher rate of resection surgery and shorter duration of hospital stay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Axmarker
- Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.,Department of Clinical Sciences, Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - M Leffler
- Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.,Department of Clinical Sciences, Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - M Lepsenyi
- Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.,Department of Clinical Sciences, Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - H Thorlacius
- Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.,Department of Clinical Sciences, Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - I Syk
- Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.,Department of Clinical Sciences, Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Zhang S, Lian P, Huang T, Zhou J. Effect of Quxie capsule in patients with colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2021; 100:e24322. [PMID: 33607767 PMCID: PMC7899823 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000024322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2020] [Accepted: 12/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate whether the Quxie capsule can decrease relapse, metastasis, and symptoms, as well as alleviate the side effects in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. METHODS A comprehensive literature search of multiple databases was performed. Two reviewers independently selected trials that assessed the relapse-metastasis rate, degree of symptoms, and side effects of Quxie capsule for CRC. The meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3. RESULTS This meta-analysis included 6 studies, with a total of 408 cases. The quality of the included studies was generally low, with only 1 trial of high quality. A statistically significant difference was observed in the relapse-metastasis rate between the Quxie capsule and control groups after 2-years follow-up (n = 185, relative risk (RR) = 0.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.04-0.46; P = .002). The Quxie capsule was found to reduce the traditional Chinese medicine symptom score as compared to the control (n = 208, weighted mean differences (WMD) = -4.15, 95% CI -7.30 to -1.00; P = .010), while it showed no significant improvement in the Karnofsky Performance Status score (n = 138, WMD = 5.05; 95% CI -2.95 to 13.04; P = .22). There was no difference in adverse events between the 2 groups (P = .66). CONCLUSION This systematic review and meta-analysis showed no clear superiority of Quxie capsule for CRC patients receiving chemotherapy. The effect of Quxie capsule in CRC patients should be examined by high quality, large sample size, multi-center RCTs, with longer follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suqin Zhang
- Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai Eighth People's Hospital
| | - Peng Lian
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center
| | - Tao Huang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shanghai Eighth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Jianhua Zhou
- Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai Eighth People's Hospital
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Sugiura K, Seo Y, Aoki H, Onishi Y, Nishi Y, Kishida N, Tanaka M, Ito Y, Tokura H, Takahashi T. Bridge to Surgery for Obstructing Colonic Cancer: A Comparison between Right- and Left-sided Lesions. JOURNAL OF THE ANUS RECTUM AND COLON 2021; 5:34-39. [PMID: 33537498 PMCID: PMC7843137 DOI: 10.23922/jarc.2020-046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2020] [Accepted: 09/08/2020] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Objectives: Few studies have compared management and outcomes of bridge to surgery (BTS) for obstructive colonic cancer according to the location of the tumor. Additional information is needed about this procedure's characteristics and short-term and long-term outcomes. We aimed to compare patient and tumor characteristics, and outcomes of BTS for obstructive right-sided versus left-sided colonic cancers. Methods: This was a retrospective, single center, cohort study. The study cohort comprised 149 patients, including 48 with right-sided and 101 with left-sided obstructive colonic cancers, who were treated with BTS between January 2007 and December 2017. Data on medical history, investigations, treatments, and prognosis were collected from an electronic database of a single hospital. The primary end points were overall (OS) and disease-free (DFS) survival and short-term surgical outcomes. Results: Significantly more patients with right-sided cancers had postoperative complications (29.2% vs. 14.9%, p = 0.039). Additionally, postoperative chemotherapy was administered to a marginally significantly greater proportion of patients with left-sided cancers (29.2% vs 45.5%, p = 0.057). The long-term outcomes were comparable between the two groups (the 5-year OS rates were 67.6% and 80.9% [p = 0.117] and the 5-year DFS rates were 62.2% and 58.6% [p = 0.671]). Multivariate analyses using all studied variables showed that lymphovascular invasion, advanced T stage, and adjuvant chemotherapy were independent poor prognostic factors. Conclusions: The long-term outcome was not different between the right- and left-sided groups. In a BTS setting, postoperative complications may reduce the compliance of adjuvant chemotherapy in right-sided cancers and affect long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kiyoaki Sugiura
- Department of Surgery, Ashikaga Red Cross Hospital, Ashikaga, Japan
| | - Yuki Seo
- Department of Surgery, Ashikaga Red Cross Hospital, Ashikaga, Japan
| | - Hikaru Aoki
- Department of Surgery, Ashikaga Red Cross Hospital, Ashikaga, Japan
| | - Yoshihiko Onishi
- Department of Surgery, Ashikaga Red Cross Hospital, Ashikaga, Japan
| | - Yusuke Nishi
- Department of Surgery, Ashikaga Red Cross Hospital, Ashikaga, Japan
| | - Norihiro Kishida
- Department of Surgery, Ashikaga Red Cross Hospital, Ashikaga, Japan
| | - Motomu Tanaka
- Department of Surgery, Ashikaga Red Cross Hospital, Ashikaga, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Ito
- Department of Surgery, Ashikaga Red Cross Hospital, Ashikaga, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Tokura
- Department of Surgery, Ashikaga Red Cross Hospital, Ashikaga, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Konopke R, Schubert J, Stöltzing O, Thomas T, Kersting S, Denz A. [Palliative Surgery in Colorectal Cancer - Which Factors Should Influence the Choice of the Surgical Procedure?]. Zentralbl Chir 2020; 146:44-57. [PMID: 33296936 DOI: 10.1055/a-1291-8293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The surgical procedure for patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) in the palliative situation cannot be adequately standardised. The present study was initiated to identify criteria for the decision for resection of the malignancy with or without anastomosis. PATIENTS/MATERIAL AND METHODS In a unicentric retrospective analysis, 103 patients after palliative resection with or without anastomosis due to CRC were examined. Using univariate and logistic regression analysis, the influence of a total of 40 factors on postoperative morbidity and mortality was assessed. RESULTS In 46 cases, resection with primary anastomosis and in 57 cases a discontinuity resection was performed. Postoperative morbidity was 44.7% and mortality 17.5%. After one-stage resection with anastomosis, nicotine abuse (OR 4.2; p = 0.044), hypalbuminaemia (OR 4.0; p = 0.012), ASA score > 2 (OR 3.7; p = 0.030) and liver remodelling/cirrhosis (OR 3.6; p = 0.031) increased the risk for postoperative complications. Hypalbuminaemia (OR 1.8; p = 0.036), cachexia (OR 1.8; p = 0.043), anaemia (OR 1.5; p = 0.038) and known alcohol abuse (OR 1.9; p = 0.023) were identified as independent risk factors for early postoperative mortality. After discontinuity resection, renal failure (OR 2.1; p = 0.042) and cachexia (OR 1.5; p = 0.045) led to a significant increase in the risk of postoperative morbidity, alcohol abuse (OR 1.8; p = 0.041) in mortality. Hypalbuminaemia (OR 2.8; p = 0.019) and an ASA score > 2 (OR 2.6; p = 0.004) after resection and reconstruction increased the risk of major complications according to Clavien-Dindo, while pre-existing renal failure (OR 1.6; p = 0.023) increased the risk after discontinuity resection. In univariate analysis, an ASA score > 2 (p = 0.038) after simultaneous tumour resection and reconstruction, and urgent surgery in both groups with or without primary anastomosis were additionally identified as significant parameters with a negative influence on mortality (p = 0.010 and p = 0.017). CONCLUSION Palliative resections of colorectal carcinomas have high morbidity and mortality. Especially in cases of pre-existing alcohol abuse and/or urgent indication for surgery, more intensive monitoring should be performed. In the case of anaemia, cachexia, hypalbuminemia and an ASA score > 2, discontinuity resection may be the more appropriate procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ralf Konopke
- Zentrum für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Elblandklinikum Riesa, Deutschland
| | - Jörg Schubert
- Klinik für Innere Medizin 2, Elblandklinikum Riesa, Deutschland
| | - Oliver Stöltzing
- Zentrum für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Elblandklinikum Riesa, Deutschland
| | - Tina Thomas
- Medizinische Klinik I, Universitätsklinikum Dresden, Deutschland
| | - Stephan Kersting
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemeine, Viszeral-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Greifswald, Deutschland
| | - Axel Denz
- Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Safety and Efficacy of Through-the-Scope Placement of Colonic Self-expandable Metal Stents Without Fluoroscopic Guidance: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2020; 30:430-434. [DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000000805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
22
|
The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Rectal Cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2020; 63:1191-1222. [PMID: 33216491 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000001762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 211] [Impact Index Per Article: 42.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
23
|
Chok AY, Lim HJ, Lye WK, Samarakoon LB, Guo J, Tang CL, Mathew R. Stenting as a bridge to surgery for obstructed stage IV colorectal cancers - long-term outcomes of a 10-year study. Asian J Endosc Surg 2020; 13:343-350. [PMID: 31436381 DOI: 10.1111/ases.12747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2019] [Accepted: 07/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Successful stenting of an obstructing colorectal tumor can avert upfront emergency surgery in malnourished obstructed patients with metastatic disease and poor physiological condition. This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of stenting followed by primary colorectal tumor resection among patients with obstructed stage IV colorectal cancer at presentation, over a 10-year period. METHODS From 2007 to 2016, a cohort comprising 25 consecutive patients were retrospectively reviewed from a prospectively collected database. The durability of palliation of bowel obstruction, oncological outcomes and factors influencing overall survival were analyzed. RESULTS No re-interventions were required for bowel obstruction during the study period. The overall perioperative morbidity rate was 16%, with no postoperative 90-day mortality. Laparoscopic resection rate was 52% and stoma formation rate was 8%. The median overall survival was 24 months for the entire cohort, and the 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were 80%, 35% and 23.33% respectively. More than one site of distant metastases, peritoneal involvement, and elevated carcinoembryonic antigen levels were significantly associated with poorer survival outcomes. Patients with peritoneal-only metastasis had worse outcomes, with a median survival of 7 months and no patients surviving beyond 18 months. CONCLUSION Stenting followed by resection of the primary obstructing colorectal cancer provides durable palliation among patients with stage IV disease, with low perioperative morbidity and stoma formation rates. Superior survival was observed among patients with single-site, non-peritoneal distant metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aik Yong Chok
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Hui Jun Lim
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Weng Kit Lye
- Center for Quantitative Medicine, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Lasitha B Samarakoon
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jiwei Guo
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Choong Leong Tang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ronnie Mathew
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
Endoscopic stenting of the colorectum has emerged as a viable alternative to surgical interventions in a selected group of patients. The main indication for stenting is bowel obstruction. As such stenting can be used to palliate patients with metastatic disease or bridge patients to surgical intervention. The main advantages of stenting in the emergency setting include lower morbidity and mortality, lower incidence of stoma formation, shorter hospitalization, and better quality of life. For patients with unresectable disease and short life expectancy, stenting can be considered. However, for patients with longer life expectancy, the potential long-term complications of a metal stent such as erosion, migration, or obstruction have engendered debate whether such patients are better served by operative intervention. Stenting as a bridge to surgery is an alternative to surgery in patients who are high risk for emergency surgery but concerns remain regarding its impact on oncologic outcome in potentially curable patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Humaa Darr
- Department of Surgery - Surgical Oncology, Al Zahra Hospital, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
| | - Maher A Abbas
- Department of Surgery - Colorectal and Digestive Surgery, Al Zahra Hospital, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ninomiya S, Fujita S, Ogawa T, Ueda Y, Shiraishi N, Inomata M, Shimoda K. Incarcerated femoral hernia treated with elective totally extraperitoneal repair: a case report. J Surg Case Rep 2020; 2020:rjaa158. [PMID: 32577212 PMCID: PMC7297550 DOI: 10.1093/jscr/rjaa158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2020] [Accepted: 05/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Incarcerated groin hernia is a common surgical emergency. However, reports of incarcerated femoral hernia treated with elective totally extraperitoneal repair are extremely rare. A 62-year-old woman visited our hospital with lower abdominal pain and bulging from a right groin lesion. The patient was diagnosed as having right incarcerated femoral hernia containing greater omentum by computed tomography. As there were no clear findings of intestinal obstruction and peritonitis, elective surgery was performed. Intraoperatively, the hernia sac had herniated into the right femoral canal. We could release the hernia sac using laparoscopic forceps. After reduction of the hernia sac, polypropylene mesh was placed in the preperitoneal space and fixed to Cooper's ligament. The patient's postoperative course was uneventful, and she was discharged 3 days after surgery. We consider elective totally extraperitoneal repair for incarcerated femoral hernia to be an effective procedure for selected patients who have been diagnosed accurately.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shigeo Ninomiya
- Department of Surgery, Cosmos Hospital, Usuki, Japan.,Department of Gastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Yufu, Japan
| | | | - Tadashi Ogawa
- Department of Surgery, Cosmos Hospital, Usuki, Japan
| | - Yoshitake Ueda
- Department of Comprehensive Surgery for Community Medicine, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Yufu, Japan
| | - Norio Shiraishi
- Department of Comprehensive Surgery for Community Medicine, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Yufu, Japan
| | - Masafumi Inomata
- Department of Gastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Yufu, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Emergency surgery for obstructed colorectal cancer in Vietnam. Asian J Surg 2020; 43:683-689. [DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2019.09.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2019] [Revised: 08/16/2019] [Accepted: 09/30/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
|
27
|
Role of Emergency Laparoscopic Colectomy for Colorectal Cancer: A Population-based Study in England. Ann Surg 2020; 270:172-179. [PMID: 29621034 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000002752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate factors associated with the use of laparoscopic surgery and the associated postoperative outcomes for urgent or emergency resection of colorectal cancer in the English National Health Service. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Laparoscopy is increasingly used for elective colorectal cancer surgery, but uptake has been limited in the emergency setting. METHODS Patients recorded in the National Bowel Cancer Audit who underwent urgent or emergency colorectal cancer resection between April 2010 and March 2016 were included. A multivariable multilevel logistic regression model was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) of undergoing laparoscopic resection and postoperative outcome according to approach. RESULTS There were 15,516 patients included. Laparoscopy use doubled from 15.1% in 2010 to 30.2% in 2016. Laparoscopy was less common in patients with poorer physical status [American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) 4/5 vs 1, OR 0.29 (95% confidence interval, 95% CI 0.23-0.37), P < 0.001] and more advanced T-stage [T4 vs T0-T2, OR 0.28 (0.23-0.34), P < 0.001] and M-stage [M1 vs M0, OR 0.85 (0.75-0.96), P < 0.001]. Age, socioeconomic deprivation, nodal stage, hospital volume, and a dedicated colorectal emergency service were not associated with laparoscopy. Laparoscopic patients had a shorter length of stay [median 8 days (interquartile range (IQR) 5 to 15) vs 12 (IQR 8 to 21), adjusted mean difference -3.67 (-4.60 to 2.74), P < 0.001], and lower 90-day mortality [8.1% vs 13.0%; adjusted OR 0.78 (0.66-0.91), P = 0.004] than patients undergoing open resection. There was no significant difference in rates of readmission or reoperation by approach. CONCLUSION The use of laparoscopic approach in the emergency resection of colorectal cancer is linked to a shorter length of hospital stay and reduced postoperative mortality.
Collapse
|
28
|
Boeding JRE, Ramphal W, Crolla RMPH, Gobardhan PD, Schreinemakers JMJ. Differences in Metastatic Pattern in Patients Presenting With or Without Obstructing Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Observational Study of 2595 Patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 27:1048-1055. [PMID: 31823170 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-08119-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about metastatic patterns in patients with obstructing colorectal cancer (CRC). OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to determine if metastatic patterns in patients with CRC differ between patients with or without obstruction. METHODS This single-center, observational, retrospective cohort study includes patients who underwent surgery for CRC between 2004 and 2015 in our hospital. Patients were divided into two groups-patients with or without obstructing CRC. All anatomic sites of distant metastases were reported. Differences in synchronous and metachronous metastases were compared between both groups. RESULTS A total of 2595 patients were included for analysis, of whom 315 (12%) presented with obstructing CRC. Synchronous metastases were diagnosed in 483 patients (19%). Patients with obstructing CRC and synchronous metastases, were diagnosed with peritoneal metastases more often than patients without obstruction (37% vs. 16%; p < 0.01). With regard to the location of the tumor, obstructing right-sided CRC patients were diagnosed with peritoneal metastases more often than patients without obstruction (52% vs. 21%; p < 0.01). Additionally, metachronous metastases were found significantly more often in patients with obstructing CRC (27%) compared with patients without obstruction (15%; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Patients with obstructing CRC have more advanced tumor stage compared with patients without obstructing CRC. Synchronous peritoneal metastases are more often encountered in patients with obstructing CRC compared with patients without obstruction. This difference is due to the raised presence of synchronous peritoneal metastases in patients with obstructed right-sided colonic cancer. Furthermore, metachronous metastases are more often found in patients with obstructing CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Winesh Ramphal
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Ormando VM, Palma R, Fugazza A, Repici A. Colonic stents for malignant bowel obstruction: current status and future prospects. Expert Rev Med Devices 2019; 16:1053-1061. [PMID: 31778081 DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2019.1697229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Although more than two decades are already passed from the first description of this technique, the debate remains open on the role of self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) placement in the management of malignant bowel obstruction (MBO). According to most recent data, SEMS placement is considered a safe and effective alternative treatment as a bridge to surgery(BTS). In addition, stent placement should be considered as primary option for palliative treatment of obstructing cancer.Areas covered: Current status, indication, technique, oncological outcomes, advantages, and risks of SEMS placement in MBO were reviewed.Expert commentary: The placement of colonic SEMS for palliation and for BTS in patients with MBO has been increasingly reported and it seems to have several advantages over emergency surgery. Substantial concerns of tumor seeding following SEMS placement, especially in case of perforation, have been raised in numerous studies. Actually, no significant differences are reported in oncologic long-term survival between patients undergoing stent placement as a BTS and those undergoing emergency surgery. Considering all the mentioned factors, indication for colorectal stenting should be evaluated only in highly specialized centers, in the context of multidisciplinary approach where risks and benefits of stenting are carefully weighed, especially in the BTS setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vittorio Maria Ormando
- Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Rossella Palma
- Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Alessandro Fugazza
- Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Rozzano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Takeyama H, Ikeda K, Danno K, Nishigaki T, Yamashita M, Taniguchi H, Oka Y. Long-term outcome after one-stage surgery without preoperative decompression for stage II/III malignant colorectal obstruction: a propensity score-matched analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2019; 34:1933-1943. [PMID: 31667590 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-019-03413-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/23/2019] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Whether malignant colorectal obstruction (MCO) after one-stage curative surgery without preoperative decompression has a poor prognosis remains unclear. We assessed long-term outcomes of one-stage surgery without preoperative decompression for stage II/III MCO. METHODS We retrospectively enrolled patients with stage II/III colorectal cancer (CRC) between April 2011 and December 2017. Propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis was used to reduce the possibility of selection bias. RESULTS In total, 464 stage II/III CRC patients were identified, of which 145 (31%) had obstruction (MCO group) and 319 (69%) did not (non-MCO group). In the MCO group, 59 (40.7%) had emergency MCO (E-MCO) and 86 (59.3%) had semi-emergency MCO (SE-MCO). The median follow-up was 37.0 (range 0-86.5) months. The tumor was deeper and larger, and serum carcinoembryonic antigen level was higher (p < 0.001, respectively) in the MCO group (including E-MCO and SE-MCO). Venous invasion-positivity rate was significantly higher (MCO and SE-MCO only, p = 0.003 and 0.009, respectively) than that in the non-MCO group. Laparoscopic surgery rate was significantly lower (MCO and E-MCO only, p < 0.001) than that in the non-MCO group. Before PSM, disease-free survival (DFS) of the SE-MCO patients was worse than that of the non-MCO patients (p = 0.046). After PSM, DFS was not significantly different between the non-MCO and MCO, E-MCO, and SE-MCO groups (p = 0.619, 0.091, and 0.308, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Long-term prognosis in patients with stage II/III MCO after one-stage surgery without preoperative decompression was similar to that in patients without MCO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroshi Takeyama
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Minoh City Hospital, Kayano 5-7-1, Minoh, Osaka, 562-0014, Japan.
| | - Kimimasa Ikeda
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Minoh City Hospital, Kayano 5-7-1, Minoh, Osaka, 562-0014, Japan
| | - Katsuki Danno
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Minoh City Hospital, Kayano 5-7-1, Minoh, Osaka, 562-0014, Japan
| | - Takahiko Nishigaki
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Minoh City Hospital, Kayano 5-7-1, Minoh, Osaka, 562-0014, Japan
| | - Masafumi Yamashita
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Minoh City Hospital, Kayano 5-7-1, Minoh, Osaka, 562-0014, Japan
| | - Hirokazu Taniguchi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Minoh City Hospital, Kayano 5-7-1, Minoh, Osaka, 562-0014, Japan
| | - Yoshio Oka
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Minoh City Hospital, Kayano 5-7-1, Minoh, Osaka, 562-0014, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Sibio S, Di Giorgio A, D'Ugo S, Palmieri G, Cinelli L, Formica V, Sensi B, Bagaglini G, Di Carlo S, Bellato V, Sica GS. Histotype influences emergency presentation and prognosis in colon cancer surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2019; 404:841-851. [PMID: 31760472 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-019-01826-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2018] [Accepted: 09/13/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
AIM To investigate whether differences in histotype in colon cancer correlate with clinical presentation and if they might influence oncological outcomes and survival. METHODS Data regarding colon cancer patients operated both electively or in emergency between 2009 and 2014 were retrospectively collected from a prospectively maintained database and analyzed for the purpose of this study. Rectal cancer was excluded from this analysis. Statistical univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to investigate possible significant variables influencing clinical presentation, as well as oncological outcomes and survival. RESULTS Data from 219 patients undergoing colorectal resection for cancer of the colon only were retrieved. One hundred seventy-four patients had an elective procedure and forty-five had an emergency colectomy. Emergency presentation was more likely to occur in mucinous (p < 0.05) and signet ring cell (p < 0.01) tumors. No definitive differences in 5-year overall (44.7% vs. 60.6%, p = 0.078) and disease-free (51.2% vs. 64.4%, p = 0.09) survival were found between the two groups as a whole, but the T3 emergency patients showed worse prognosis than the elective (p < 0.03). Lymph node invasion, laparoscopy, histology, and blood transfusions were independent variables found to influence survival. Distribution assessed for pTNM stage showed T3 cancers were more common in emergency (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION Mucinous and signet ring cell tumors are related to emergency presentation, pT3 stage, poorest outcomes, and survival. Disease-free survival in patients who had emergency surgery for T3 colon cancer seems related to the histotype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Sibio
- Department of Surgery "Pietro Valdoni", Sapienza University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161, Rome, Italy.
- Department of Surgery "Pietro Valdoni", Sapienza University of Rome, Via Lancisi 2, 00155, Rome, Italy.
| | - A Di Giorgio
- Department of Surgery, Tor Vergata Hospital, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Viale Oxford 81, 00133, Rome, Italy
| | - S D'Ugo
- Department of Surgery, Tor Vergata Hospital, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Viale Oxford 81, 00133, Rome, Italy
| | - G Palmieri
- Department of Surgery, Tor Vergata Hospital, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Viale Oxford 81, 00133, Rome, Italy
| | - L Cinelli
- Department of Surgery, Tor Vergata Hospital, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Viale Oxford 81, 00133, Rome, Italy
| | - V Formica
- Department of Surgery, Tor Vergata Hospital, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Viale Oxford 81, 00133, Rome, Italy
| | - B Sensi
- Department of Surgery, Tor Vergata Hospital, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Viale Oxford 81, 00133, Rome, Italy
| | - G Bagaglini
- Department of Surgery, Tor Vergata Hospital, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Viale Oxford 81, 00133, Rome, Italy
| | - S Di Carlo
- Department of Surgery, Tor Vergata Hospital, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Viale Oxford 81, 00133, Rome, Italy
| | - V Bellato
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161, Rome, Italy
| | - G S Sica
- Department of Surgery, Tor Vergata Hospital, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Viale Oxford 81, 00133, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Costa G, Frezza B, Fransvea P, Massa G, Ferri M, Mercantini P, Balducci G, Buondonno A, Rocca A, Ceccarelli G. Clinico-pathological Features of Colon Cancer Patients Undergoing Emergency Surgery: A Comparison Between Elderly and Non-elderly Patients. Open Med (Wars) 2019; 14:726-734. [PMID: 31637303 PMCID: PMC6778396 DOI: 10.1515/med-2019-0082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2019] [Accepted: 07/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers in patients older than 65 years. Emergency presentation represents about 30% of cases, with increased morbidity and mortality rates. The aim of this study is to compare the perioperative outcome between elderly and non-elderly patients undergoing emergency surgery. METHOD We retrospectively analysed CRC patients that underwent emergency surgery at the Departments of Surgery of the Sapienza University Sant'Andrea Hospital in Rome, and at San Donato Hospital in Arezzo, between June 2012 and June 2017. Patients were divided into two groups: non-elderly (< 65 years) and elderly (≥ 65 years). Variables analysed were sex, onset symptoms, associated disease, ASA score, tumor site and TNM stage, surgical procedures and approach, and morbidity and mortality. RESULTS Of a total of 123 patients, 29 patients were non-elderly and 94 patients were elderly. No significant differences were observed in sex, onset symptoms and tumor site between the two groups. Comorbidities were significantly higher in elderly patients (73.4% vs 41.4%, p<0.001). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in surgical approach and the rate of one-stage procedures. Elderly patients were more frequently treated by Hartmann's procedure compared to non-elderly patients (20.2% vs 6.9%). Left colorectal resection with protective ileostomy was most frequent in the non-elderly group (27.6% vs 11.7%). No significant differences were found in the pT and pN categories of the TNM system between the two groups. However, a higher number of T3 in non-elderly patients was observed. A consistent number of non-oncologically adequate resections were observed in the elderly (21.3% vs 3.5%; p<0.03). The morbidity rate was significantly higher in the elderly group (31.9 % vs 3.4%, p<0.001). No significant difference was found in the mortality rate between the two groups, being 13.8% in the elderly and 6.9% in the non-elderly. CONCLUSIONS Emergency colorectal surgery for cancer still presents significant morbidity and mortality rates, especially in elderly patients. More aggressive tumors and advanced stages were more frequent in the non-elderly group and as a matter it should be taken into account when treating such patients in the emergency setting in order to perform a radical procedure as much as possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianluca Costa
- Surgical and Medical Department of Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Via di Grottarossa 1035-39, 00189Rome, Italy
| | - Barbara Frezza
- Surgical and Medical Department of Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Via di Grottarossa 1035-39, 00189Rome, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, San Donato Hospital, via Pietro Nenni 20-22, 52100Arezzo, Italy
| | - Pietro Fransvea
- Surgical and Medical Department of Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Via di Grottarossa 1035-39, 00189Rome, Italy
| | - Giulia Massa
- Surgical and Medical Department of Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Via di Grottarossa 1035-39, 00189Rome, Italy
| | - Mario Ferri
- Surgical and Medical Department of Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Via di Grottarossa 1035-39, 00189Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Mercantini
- Surgical and Medical Department of Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Via di Grottarossa 1035-39, 00189Rome, Italy
| | - Genoveffa Balducci
- Surgical and Medical Department of Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Via di Grottarossa 1035-39, 00189Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Buondonno
- Surgical and Medical Department of Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Via di Grottarossa 1035-39, 00189Rome, Italy
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences “V. Tiberio”, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Aldo Rocca
- Colorectal Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori “Fondazione Giovanni Pascale” IRCCS, Naples, Italy
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences “V. Tiberio”, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Graziano Ceccarelli
- Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, San Donato Hospital, via Pietro Nenni 20-22, 52100Arezzo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Javarsiani MH, Javanmard SH, Colonna F. Metastatic components in colorectal cancer. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL SCIENCES 2019; 24:75. [PMID: 31523261 PMCID: PMC6734673 DOI: 10.4103/jrms.jrms_957_18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2019] [Revised: 03/05/2019] [Accepted: 05/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Recent experiments have shown that cells with different genetic mutations can give rise to cancer transformation, both in vitro and in vivo, supported by the crosstalk between cancer cells and stroma. The stroma and the complex set of involved cells make up the tumor microenvironment that supports the engraftment of metastatic cells. In fact, environmental factors support colorectal cancer arise by formation and maintenance of cancer stem cells (CSCs). In this review, we discuss interactions between CSCs and their microenvironment that can provide better therapeutic opportunities in the metastatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Shagayegh Haghjooy Javanmard
- Applied Physiology Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Francesca Colonna
- Department of General Pathology, Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Largo Francesco University, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Nozawa H, Morikawa T, Kawai K, Hata K, Tanaka T, Nishikawa T, Sasaki K, Shuno Y, Kaneko M, Hiyoshi M, Emoto S, Murono K, Sonoda H, Fukayama M, Ishihara S. Obstruction is associated with perineural invasion in T3/T4 colon cancer. Colorectal Dis 2019; 21:917-924. [PMID: 31017742 DOI: 10.1111/codi.14655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2018] [Accepted: 03/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
AIM Perineural invasion (PNI) is a risk factor for recurrence and metastasis and consequently leads to decreased survival in patients with various malignancies. Recent studies showed that stent placement in obstructive colon cancer increases the frequency of PNI. We hypothesized that mechanical stress including obstruction itself may be associated with PNI. METHOD We retrospectively reviewed 496 patients with pathological T3 or T4 colon cancer who did not receive preoperative treatment. Data were collected from medical charts and pathological findings. The relationships between PNI and other clinicopathological factors were analysed using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS PNI was observed in 239 (48%) patients. Obstruction was markedly more frequent in PNI-positive cancer (39%) than in PNI-negative cancer (24%, P = 0.0003). Multivariate analyses identified obstruction as one of the significant factors associated with PNI (OR 1.68, P = 0.028). Moreover, in 414 patients without distant metastasis who underwent complete resection, PNI was an independent factor associated with poor recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio 2.35, P = 0.003). The coexistence of PNI and obstruction resulted in greater decreases in recurrence-free survival than PNI-negative and/or non-obstructive cases. CONCLUSION Our results suggest that obstruction is associated with PNI and consequently contributes to an increased postoperative recurrence in colon cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Nozawa
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - T Morikawa
- Department of Pathology, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - K Kawai
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - K Hata
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - T Tanaka
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - T Nishikawa
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - K Sasaki
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Y Shuno
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - M Kaneko
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - M Hiyoshi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - S Emoto
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - K Murono
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - H Sonoda
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - M Fukayama
- Department of Pathology, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - S Ishihara
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Lee JH, Emelogu I, Kukreja K, Ali FS, Nogueras-Gonzalez G, Lum P, Coronel E, Ross W, Raju GS, Lynch P, Thirumurthi S, Stroehlein J, Wang Y, You YQN, Weston B. Safety and efficacy of metal stents for malignant colonic obstruction in patients treated with bevacizumab. Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 90:116-124. [PMID: 30797835 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.02.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2018] [Accepted: 02/04/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The aim of this study was to examine clinical outcomes and adverse events (AEs) of self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) in the management of malignant colonic obstruction (MCO). METHODS Patients with SEMSs for MCO treated at our institution from 2007 to 2016 were included. Clinical success was defined as successful oral intake after the procedure and technical success as stent deployment across the stricture in the desired location. RESULTS Of 199 patients, the mean age was 58, 54% were men, and 99% had stage IV cancer. MCO etiology was colorectal cancer in 82% and extrinsic compression in 17%. Technical success was achieved in 99.5% and clinical success in 89%. The SEMSs were palliative in 97% and were a bridge to surgery in 4%. MCO occurred in the left side of the colon in 90%, transverse in 4.5%, and ascending colon in 5.5%. SEMSs were placed in curved segments in 30% and straight segments in 70%. Tandem SEMSs were required in 27 patients. Forty-six patients had 48 AEs (24%), including 2% periprocedure, 15% postprocedure, and 83% after 72 hours. Stent-related AEs (n = 25) included persistent obstruction (n = 14), occlusion (n = 10), and failure of expansion (n = 1). Procedural AEs (n = 23) included minor bleeding (n = 2), perforations (n = 4), abdominal pain (n = 12), stent migration (n = 4), and respiratory insufficiency (n = 1). Repeat procedures were performed in 21 of 46 patients. After SEMSs, 48 patients underwent surgery, including resection with primary anastomosis (n = 8), resection with definitive stoma (n = 18), and diverting stoma without resection (n = 19). Mean time to surgery after SEMS placement was 175 days. Postsurgical AEs occurred in those with resections (leak, 2; infection, 2). Of 104 receiving bevacizumab, 22% had AEs, including 1 perforation compared with 3 in the nonbevacizumab group (P = .549). Mean overall survival was 5.6 months. Extrinsic compression and curved strictures were associated with poor clinical success by univariate analysis and etiology (noncolonic with poor outcome) by multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS SEMSs for MCO has high technical but suboptimal clinical success. Curved strictures and extrinsic compression are associated with poor outcomes. The perforation rate was not higher in the bevacizumab compared with the nonbevacizumab group, although this should be further validated in a larger population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey H Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Keshav Kukreja
- University of Texas Health Sciences Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Faisal S Ali
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Graciela Nogueras-Gonzalez
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Philip Lum
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Emmanuel Coronel
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - William Ross
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Gottumukkala S Raju
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Patrick Lynch
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Selvi Thirumurthi
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - John Stroehlein
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Yinghong Wang
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Yi-Quan N You
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Brian Weston
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Ribeiro IB, de Moura DTH, Thompson CC, de Moura EGH. Acute abdominal obstruction: Colon stent or emergency surgery? An evidence-based review. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 11:193-208. [PMID: 30918585 PMCID: PMC6425283 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v11.i3.193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2019] [Revised: 01/29/2019] [Accepted: 02/13/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
According to the American Cancer Society and Colorectal Cancer Statistics 2017, colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common malignancies in the United States and the second leading cause of cancer death in the world in 2018. Previous studies demonstrated that 8%-29% of patients with primary CRC present malignant colonic obstruction (MCO). In the past, emergency surgery has been the primary treatment for MCO, although morbidity and surgical mortality rates are higher in these settings than in elective procedures. In the 1990s, self-expanding metal stents appeared and was a watershed in the treatment of patients in gastrointestinal surgical emergencies. The studies led to high expectations because the use of stents could prevent surgical intervention, such as colostomy, leading to lower morbidity and mortality, possibly resulting in higher quality of life. This review was designed to provide present evidence of the indication, technique, outcomes, benefits, and risks of these treatments in acute MCO through the analysis of previously published studies and current guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Igor Braga Ribeiro
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Department of Endoscopy of Clinics Hospital of São Paulo University, São Paulo 05403-000, Brazil
| | - Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Department of Endoscopy of Clinics Hospital of São Paulo University, São Paulo 05403-000, Brazil
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, United States
| | - Christopher C Thompson
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Srinivasa RN, Pampati R, Patel N, Srinivasa RN, Hage AN, Chick JFB. Interventional Radiology-Operated Endoscopy: Indications, Implementation, and Innovation. Semin Intervent Radiol 2019; 35:477-485. [PMID: 30728664 DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1676327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ravi N Srinivasa
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Health Systems, Ann Arbor, Michigan.,Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Rudra Pampati
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Health Systems, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Nishant Patel
- Radiology Imaging Associates Endovascular, Englewood, Colorado
| | - Rajiv N Srinivasa
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Health Systems, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Anthony N Hage
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Health Systems, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Menegozzo CAM, Teixeira-Júnior F, do Couto-Netto SD, Martins-Júnior O, de Oliveira Bernini C, Utiyama EM. Outcomes of Elderly Patients Undergoing Emergency Surgery for Complicated Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2019; 74:e1074. [PMID: 31433041 PMCID: PMC6691836 DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2019/e1074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2018] [Accepted: 03/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Colorectal cancer is one of the most frequent types of malignant neoplasms. Age is a risk factor for this disease, with 75% of cases diagnosed in patients older than 65 years. Complications such as obstruction, hemorrhage, and perforation are present in more than one-third of cases and require emergency treatment. We aim to analyze the profile of elderly patients undergoing surgery for complicated colorectal cancer, and to evaluate factors related to worse short-term prognosis. METHODS A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent emergency surgical treatment for complicated colorectal cancer was performed. Demographics, clinical, radiological and histological data were collected. RESULTS Sixty-seven patients were analyzed. The median age was 72 years, and almost half (46%) of the patients were female. Obstruction was the most prevalent complication at initial presentation (72%). The most common sites of neoplasia were the left and sigmoid colon in 22 patients (32.8%), and the right colon in 17 patients (25.4%). Resection was performed in 88% of cases, followed by primary anastomosis in almost half. The most frequent clinical stages were II (48%) and III (22%). Forty-three patients (65.7%) had some form of postoperative complication. Clavien-Dindo grades 1, 2, and 4, were the most frequent. Complete oncologic resection was observed in 80% of the cases. The thirty-day mortality rate was 10.4%. Advanced age was associated with worse morbidity and mortality. CONCLUSION Elderly patients with complicated colorectal cancer undergoing emergency surgery have high morbidity and mortality rates. Advanced age is significantly associated with worse outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Augusto Metidieri Menegozzo
- Divisao de Cirurgia Geral e Trauma, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR
- *Corresponding author. E-mail: /
| | - Frederico Teixeira-Júnior
- Divisao de Cirurgia Geral e Trauma, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR
| | - Sérgio Dias do Couto-Netto
- Divisao de Cirurgia Geral e Trauma, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR
| | - Octacílio Martins-Júnior
- Divisao de Cirurgia Geral e Trauma, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR
| | - Celso de Oliveira Bernini
- Divisao de Cirurgia Geral e Trauma, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR
| | - Edivaldo Massazo Utiyama
- Divisao de Cirurgia Geral e Trauma, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Wanis KN, Ott M, Van Koughnett JAM, Colquhoun P, Brackstone M. Long-term oncological outcomes following emergency resection of colon cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 2018; 33:1525-1532. [PMID: 29946860 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-018-3109-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/20/2018] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The relationship between emergency colon cancer resection and long-term oncological outcomes is not well understood. Our objective was to characterize the impact of emergency resection for colon cancer on disease-free and overall patient survival. METHODS Data on patients undergoing resection for colon cancer from 2006 to 2015 were collected from a prospectively maintained clinical and administrative database. The median follow-up time was 4.4 years. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the hazard ratios for recurrence and death for patients treated with surgery for an emergent presentation. Differences in initiation of, and timeliness of, adjuvant chemotherapy between emergently and electively treated patients were also examined. RESULTS Of the 1180 patients who underwent resection for stages I, II, or III colon cancer, 158 (13%) had emergent surgery. After adjustment for patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics, the HR for recurrence was 1.64 (95% CI 1.12-2.40) and for death was 1.47 (95% CI 1.10-1.97). After adjustment for tumor characteristics, patients who underwent emergency resection were similarly likely to receive adjuvant chemotherapy (OR 1.1; 95% CI 0.70-1.76). The time from surgery to initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy was also similar between the groups. CONCLUSIONS Emergency surgery for localized or regional colon cancer is associated with a greater risk of recurrence and death. This association does not appear to be due to differences in adjuvant treatment. A focus on screening and colon cancer awareness in order to reduce emergency presentations is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kerollos Nashat Wanis
- Department of Surgery, Western University, London Health Sciences Centre, Rm. C8-114, London, Ontario, N6A 5A5, Canada.
| | - Michael Ott
- Department of Surgery, Western University, London Health Sciences Centre, Rm. C8-114, London, Ontario, N6A 5A5, Canada
| | - Julie Ann M Van Koughnett
- Department of Surgery, Western University, London Health Sciences Centre, Rm. C8-114, London, Ontario, N6A 5A5, Canada
| | - Patrick Colquhoun
- Department of Surgery, Western University, London Health Sciences Centre, Rm. C8-114, London, Ontario, N6A 5A5, Canada
| | - Muriel Brackstone
- Department of Surgery, Western University, London Health Sciences Centre, Rm. C8-114, London, Ontario, N6A 5A5, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Boeding JRE, Ramphal W, Crolla RMPH, Boonman-de Winter LJM, Gobardhan PD, Schreinemakers JMJ. Ileus caused by obstructing colorectal cancer-impact on long-term survival. Int J Colorectal Dis 2018; 33:1393-1400. [PMID: 30046958 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-018-3132-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/12/2018] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE It is unclear whether obstructing colorectal cancer (CRC) has a worse prognosis than non-obstructing CRC. Of CRC patients, 10-28% present with symptoms of acute obstruction. Previous studies regarding obstruction have been primarily based on short-term outcomes, risk factors and treatment modalities. With this study, we want to determine the long-term survival of patients presenting with acute obstructive CRC. METHODS This single-centre observational retrospective cohort study includes all CRC patients who underwent surgery between December 2004 and 2010. Patients were divided into two groups: ileus and no ileus. Survival analyses were performed for both groups. Additional survival analyses were performed in patients with and without synchronous metastases. The primary outcome was survival in months. RESULTS A total of 1236 patients were included in the analyses. Ileus occurred in 178 patients (14.4%). The 5-year survival for patients with an ileus was 32% and without 60% (P < 0.01). In patients without synchronous metastases, survival with and without an ileus was 40.9 and 68.4%, respectively (P < 0.01). If ileus presentation was complicated by a colon blowout, 5-year survival decreased to 29%. No significant difference was found in patients with synchronous metastases. Survival at 5 years in this subgroup was 10 and 12% for patients with and without an ileus, respectively (P = 0.705). CONCLUSIONS Patients with obstructive CRC have a reduced short-term overall survival. Also, long-term overall survival is impaired in patients who present with acute obstructive CRC compared to patients without obstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeske R E Boeding
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Molengracht 21, 4818 CK, Breda, The Netherlands.
| | - Winesh Ramphal
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Molengracht 21, 4818 CK, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - Rogier M P H Crolla
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Molengracht 21, 4818 CK, Breda, The Netherlands
| | | | - Paul D Gobardhan
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Molengracht 21, 4818 CK, Breda, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Roses RE, Folkert IW, Krouse RS. Malignant Bowel Obstruction: Reappraising the Value of Surgery. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2018; 27:705-715. [PMID: 30213414 DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2018.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Urgent palliative surgery in the setting of advanced malignancy is associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and cost. Malignant bowel obstruction is the most frequent indication for such intervention. Traditional surgical dogma is often invoked to justify associated risks and cost, but little evidence exists to support surgical over nonsurgical approaches. Evolving evidence may provide more meaningful guidance for treatment selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert E Roses
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, 4 Silverstein Pavilion, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
| | - Ian W Folkert
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, 4 Maloney Building, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Robert S Krouse
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, 3900 Woodland Ave, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Pisano M, Zorcolo L, Merli C, Cimbanassi S, Poiasina E, Ceresoli M, Agresta F, Allievi N, Bellanova G, Coccolini F, Coy C, Fugazzola P, Martinez CA, Montori G, Paolillo C, Penachim TJ, Pereira B, Reis T, Restivo A, Rezende-Neto J, Sartelli M, Valentino M, Abu-Zidan FM, Ashkenazi I, Bala M, Chiara O, de’ Angelis N, Deidda S, De Simone B, Di Saverio S, Finotti E, Kenji I, Moore E, Wexner S, Biffl W, Coimbra R, Guttadauro A, Leppäniemi A, Maier R, Magnone S, Mefire AC, Peitzmann A, Sakakushev B, Sugrue M, Viale P, Weber D, Kashuk J, Fraga GP, Kluger I, Catena F, Ansaloni L. 2017 WSES guidelines on colon and rectal cancer emergencies: obstruction and perforation. World J Emerg Surg 2018; 13:36. [PMID: 30123315 PMCID: PMC6090779 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-018-0192-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 184] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2018] [Accepted: 06/28/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
ᅟ Obstruction and perforation due to colorectal cancer represent challenging matters in terms of diagnosis, life-saving strategies, obstruction resolution and oncologic challenge. The aims of the current paper are to update the previous WSES guidelines for the management of large bowel perforation and obstructive left colon carcinoma (OLCC) and to develop new guidelines on obstructive right colon carcinoma (ORCC). METHODS The literature was extensively queried for focused publication until December 2017. Precise analysis and grading of the literature has been performed by a working group formed by a pool of experts: the statements and literature review were presented, discussed and voted at the Consensus Conference of the 4th Congress of the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) held in Campinas in May 2017. RESULTS CT scan is the best imaging technique to evaluate large bowel obstruction and perforation. For OLCC, self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS), when available, offers interesting advantages as compared to emergency surgery; however, the positioning of SEMS for surgically treatable causes carries some long-term oncologic disadvantages, which are still under analysis. In the context of emergency surgery, resection and primary anastomosis (RPA) is preferable to Hartmann's procedure, whenever the characteristics of the patient and the surgeon are permissive. Right-sided loop colostomy is preferable in rectal cancer, when preoperative therapies are predicted.With regards to the treatment of ORCC, right colectomy represents the procedure of choice; alternatives, such as internal bypass and loop ileostomy, are of limited value.Clinical scenarios in the case of perforation might be dramatic, especially in case of free faecal peritonitis. The importance of an appropriate balance between life-saving surgical procedures and respect of oncologic caveats must be stressed. In selected cases, a damage control approach may be required.Medical treatments including appropriate fluid resuscitation, early antibiotic treatment and management of co-existing medical conditions according to international guidelines must be delivered to all patients at presentation. CONCLUSIONS The current guidelines offer an extensive overview of available evidence and a qualitative consensus regarding management of large bowel obstruction and perforation due to colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Pisano
- General Surgery Papa Giovanni XXII Hospital Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Luigi Zorcolo
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Cecilia Merli
- Unit of Emergency Medicine Ospedale Bufalini Cesena, AUSL Romagna, Romagna, Italy
| | | | - Elia Poiasina
- General Surgery Papa Giovanni XXII Hospital Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Marco Ceresoli
- Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Niccolò Allievi
- General Surgery Papa Giovanni XXII Hospital Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy
| | | | - Federico Coccolini
- Unit of General and Emergency Surgery, Ospedale Bufalini Cesena, AUSL Romagna, Romagna, Italy
| | - Claudio Coy
- Colorectal Unit, Campinas State University, Campinas, SP Brazil
| | - Paola Fugazzola
- General Surgery Papa Giovanni XXII Hospital Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy
| | | | | | - Ciro Paolillo
- Emergency Department Udine Healthcare and University Integrated Trust, Udine, Italy
| | | | - Bruno Pereira
- Department of Surgery, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
| | - Tarcisio Reis
- Oncology Surgery and Intensive Care, Oswaldo Cruz Hospital, Recife, Brazil
| | - Angelo Restivo
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Joao Rezende-Neto
- Department of Surgery Division of General Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Massimo Valentino
- Radiology Unit Emergency Department, S. Antonio Abate Hospital, Tolmezzo, UD Italy
| | - Fikri M. Abu-Zidan
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, UAE University, Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates
| | | | - Miklosh Bala
- Trauma and Acute Care Surgery Unit Hadassah, Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | | | - Nicola de’ Angelis
- Unit of Digestive Surgery, HPB Surgery and Liver Transplant Henri Mondor Hospital, Créteil, France
| | - Simona Deidda
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Belinda De Simone
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery Cannes’ Hospital Cannes, Cedex, Cannes, France
| | | | - Elena Finotti
- Department of General Surgery ULSS5 del Veneto, Adria, (RO) Italy
| | - Inaba Kenji
- Division of Trauma & Critical Care University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Ernest Moore
- Department of Surgery, Denver Health Medical Center, University of Colorado, Denver, CO USA
| | - Steven Wexner
- Digestive Disease Center, Department of Colorectal Surgery Cleveland Clinic Florida, Tallahassee, USA
| | - Walter Biffl
- Acute Care Surgery The Queen’s Medical Center, Honolulu, HI USA
| | - Raul Coimbra
- Division of Trauma, Surgical Critical Care, Burns, and Acute Care Surgery, University of California San Diego Health Sciences, San Diego, USA
| | - Angelo Guttadauro
- Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Ari Leppäniemi
- Second Department of Surgery, Meilahti Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Ron Maier
- Department of Surgery, Harborview Medical Centre, Seattle, USA
| | - Stefano Magnone
- General Surgery Papa Giovanni XXII Hospital Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Alain Chicom Mefire
- Department of Surgery and Obs/Gyn, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Buea, Buea, Cameroon
| | - Andrew Peitzmann
- Department of Surgery, Trauma and Surgical Services, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, USA
| | - Boris Sakakushev
- General Surgery Department, Medical University, University Hospital St George, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Michael Sugrue
- General Surgery Department, Letterkenny Hospital, Letterkenny, Ireland
| | - Pierluigi Viale
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Sant’Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Dieter Weber
- Trauma and General Surgeon, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia
| | - Jeffry Kashuk
- Surgery and Critical Care Assuta Medical Centers, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Gustavo P. Fraga
- Division of Trauma Surgery, Department of Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas (Unicamp), Campinas, SP Brazil
| | - Ioran Kluger
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Surgery, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Fausto Catena
- Department of Emergency Surgery, Parma Maggiore Hospital, Parma, Italy
| | - Luca Ansaloni
- Unit of General and Emergency Surgery, Ospedale Bufalini Cesena, AUSL Romagna, Romagna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Shimizu H, Yamazaki R, Ohtsuka H, Osaka I, Takuma K, Morita Y. Feasibility of laparoscopic surgery after stent insertion for obstructive colorectal cancer. Asian J Endosc Surg 2018; 11:118-122. [PMID: 29045026 DOI: 10.1111/ases.12434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2017] [Revised: 08/29/2017] [Accepted: 08/31/2017] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A growing number of patients with obstructive colorectal cancer are being treated with self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS) followed by laparoscopic resection. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of stent insertion and laparoscopic surgery for obstructive colorectal cancer and to compare these outcomes to regular laparoscopic surgery for non-obstructive colorectal cancer. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of patients with a malignant colonic obstruction who underwent SEMS placement followed by elective laparoscopic resection. The comparison was made between stent-laparoscopy and laparoscopy alone for non-obstructive colorectal cancer. RESULTS Colonic stenting as a bridge to surgery was successful in 97.1% of all cases. Fifteen patients underwent an elective laparoscopic surgery for left-sided colon and rectal cancer after SEMS. The mean interval from SEMS insertion to laparoscopic surgery was 21.5 days. There was no conversion to open surgery and no need for a diverting stoma. One patient (6.7%) experienced paralytic ileus. Our comparison of stent-laparoscopy to regular laparoscopy for non-obstructive colorectal cancer treatment showed comparable short-term postoperative outcomes with the exception of blood loss, which was greater in the stent-laparoscopy group. CONCLUSION Elective laparoscopic surgery after colonic stenting is a safe and feasible strategy for the treatment of an acute malignant colonic obstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hideharu Shimizu
- Department of Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Tama Medical Center, Fuchu, Japan
| | - Ryoto Yamazaki
- Department of Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Tama Medical Center, Fuchu, Japan
| | - Hideo Ohtsuka
- Department of Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Tama Medical Center, Fuchu, Japan
| | - Itaru Osaka
- Department of Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Tama Medical Center, Fuchu, Japan
| | - Kunio Takuma
- Department of Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Tama Medical Center, Fuchu, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Morita
- Department of Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Tama Medical Center, Fuchu, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pelvic exenteration carries significant risks of morbidity and mortality. Preoperative management is therefore crucial, and the exenteration procedure is usually performed in an elective setting. In cases of rectal cancer, however, tumor-related complications may cause a patient's condition to deteriorate rapidly, despite optimal management. Urgent pelvic exenteration then may be an option for these patients. OBJECTIVE This study aims to compare the outcomes of pelvic exenteration between the urgent and elective settings. DESIGN This is a retrospective study. SETTING This study was conducted at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital between February 2006 and June 2012. PATIENTS Fifty-three patients with locally advanced rectal cancer were included. INTERVENTION All patients underwent pelvic exenteration for locally advanced rectal cancer. They were assigned to urgent and elective setting groups according to their preoperative conditions. The urgent setting group included patients who required urgent pelvic exenteration because of intestinal obstruction, bowel perforation, bleeding, or uncontrolled sepsis, despite optimal management preoperatively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Twenty-six patients were classified in the urgent setting group, and 27 were classified in the elective setting group. Three-year overall and disease-free survivals were compared between the 2 groups. Thirty-day postoperative morbidity and mortality were also studied. RESULTS Three-year overall survival was 62.2% and 54.4% in the elective and urgent groups (p = 0.7), whereas three-year disease-free survival was 43% and 63.8% (p = 0.33). The median follow-up time was 33 months. Thirty-day morbidity did not differ between the 2 groups (p = 0.49). A low serum albumin level was a significant risk factor for complications. There was no postoperative mortality in this study. LIMITATIONS This was a retrospective study performed at 1 institution, and it lacked quality-of-life scores. CONCLUSION Pelvic exenteration in an urgent setting is feasible and could offer acceptable outcomes. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A591.
Collapse
|
45
|
Kumar L, Satheesan KN, Rajan S, Vasu BK, Paul J. Predictors and Outcomes of Postoperative Pulmonary Complications following Abdominal Surgery in a South Indian Population. Anesth Essays Res 2018; 12:199-205. [PMID: 29628582 PMCID: PMC5872864 DOI: 10.4103/aer.aer_69_17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC) following abdominal surgery are associated with increased morbidity and poorer outcomes. We prospectively examined risk factors associated with the development of PPC in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. Aims The primary outcome was to determine the association of predefined risk factors in the prediction of PPC after abdominal surgery. Secondary outcomes were evaluation of outcomes of PPC. Setting and Design This was a prospective study conducted in the gastrosurgical and urological units of a tertiary care referral hospital in patients undergoing abdominal surgery over a period of 6 months (November 2015-April 2016). Materials and Methods Relevant preoperative and intraoperative variables were recorded by the anesthesiologist in a pro forma provided. Postoperatively, data from the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) were collected from data sheets. PPC were defined according to preset criteria and outcomes of the patients including ICU stay, hospital stay, and mortality were noted. Statistical Analysis Chi-square test was used to find the association of risk factors of PPC. Mann-Whitney test was used for continuous variables and McNemar's test for postoperative respiratory variables. A final regression analysis was performed with factors with significant association (P < 0.1). Results One hundred and fifty patients were included, and 24 patients (16%) developed PPC as defined by our criteria. Emergency surgery (44.4% of PPC) and cardiac comorbidity (23.9% of PPC) were significant associations for pulmonary complications. The length of ICU and hospital stay (LOICU, LOHS) and mortality were higher in the group with pulmonary complications (P < 0.001). Conclusions Emergent surgery and cardiac comorbidities were independent predictors for the development of PPC. PPC are associated with increased LOHS, LOICU stay, and mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lakshmi Kumar
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Amrita University, Cochin, Kerala, India
| | - Keerthi N Satheesan
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Amrita University, Cochin, Kerala, India
| | - Sunil Rajan
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Amrita University, Cochin, Kerala, India
| | - Bindu K Vasu
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Amrita University, Cochin, Kerala, India
| | - Jerry Paul
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Amrita University, Cochin, Kerala, India
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Cirocchi R, Cesare Campanile F, Di Saverio S, Popivanov G, Carlini L, Pironi D, Tabola R, Vettoretto N. Laparoscopic versus open colectomy for obstructing right colon cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Visc Surg 2017; 154:387-399. [PMID: 29113714 DOI: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2017.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hemicolectomy is the treatment of choice for intestinal obstruction from right colon cancer. This review compares the laparoscopic vs open access in hemicolectomy for patients with right colon cancer. METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies published after January 2017 was performed according to the Prisma guidelines. The study has been recorded on the Prospero register (CRD42016044108). RESULTS Five studies were included for review. Only one anastomotic leak was reported in conventional open anastomosis group (1.9%) and none of the studies included in the meta-analysis reported re-operations during the first 30 postoperative days. The 30-day postoperative mortality did not differ between the two groups. The length of incision, blood loss, early mobilization after surgery, the 30-day postoperative overall complication rate and hospital length of stay were significantly shorter in the laparoscopic group. The difference in the duration of procedure was statistically significant in favor of the open group. The number of dissected lymph nodes, the overall survival at 5 years and time to flatus were described only in one study, without any significant difference. Finally, none of the trials reported any information concerning differences in the costs between the two techniques. CONCLUSIONS The better outcomes described in this study achieved with laparoscopy, must be interpreted with caution because of the small number of patients involved, the selection and publication bias and the low level of evidence of the analysed trials. Indeed, the advantages of a minimally invasive approach, which have been demonstrated by the present meta-analysis, should encourage the use of laparoscopy also in emergency setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Cirocchi
- Department of general and oncologic surgery, university of Perugia, 1, via Tristano di Joannuccio, 05100 Terni, Italy.
| | | | - S Di Saverio
- Emergency surgery and trauma surgery unit, Maggiore hospital trauma center, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - L Carlini
- Department of legal medicine, university of Perugia, Terni, Italy
| | - D Pironi
- Department of surgical sciences, Sapienza university of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - R Tabola
- Department of gastrointestinal and general surgery, medical university of Wrocław, Wrocław, Poland
| | - N Vettoretto
- Laparoscopic surgery unit, department of surgery, M Mellini hospital, Chiari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Talebreza A, Yahaghi E, Bolvardi E, Masoumi B, Bahramian M, Darian EK, Ahmadi K. Investigation of clinicopathological parameters in emergency colorectal cancer surgery: a study of 67 patients. Arch Med Sci 2017; 13:1394-1398. [PMID: 29181070 PMCID: PMC5701685 DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2016.61385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2016] [Accepted: 06/26/2016] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim of the present study was to establish, having adjusted for case mix, the size of the differences in postoperative mortality and 5-year survival between patients presenting as an emergency with evidence of obstruction and perforation and the association of clinicopathological factors with mortality (bivariate analyses). MATERIAL AND METHODS The study included 67 patients who presented with colorectal cancer (CRC) between 2009 and 2013 in Iran. The mean age of the patients was 59.7 years. Of the 67 patients, 37 (55.22%) were male and 30 (44.77%) were female. Certain parameters that correlated with CRC and surgical treatment were investigated. RESULTS Our results showed that 46 (68.65%) patients had obstruction, while perforation was observed in 21 (31.34%) cases. Among the patients with obstruction, obstruction of the right colon was observed in 29 (43.28%) cases. There was no significant difference in mortality rate between right and left colonic obstruction. Based on the bivariate analyses, our findings showed that death of patients was significantly related to tumor grade (p = 0.02) and TNM staging (p = 0.026), but no association was found between other parameters and death, including age, sex, and tumor site. CONCLUSIONS Compared with patients who undergo elective surgery for colon cancer, those who present as an emergency with evidence of obstruction or perforation have higher postoperative mortality rates and poorer cancer-specific survival. Also, colorectal cancer patients with emergency surgery showed aggressive histopathology and an advanced stage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amir Talebreza
- Department of Surgery, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Emad Yahaghi
- Department of Molecular Biology, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Ehsan Bolvardi
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Imam Reza Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Babak Masoumi
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Mehran Bahramian
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Madani Hospital, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran
| | | | - Koorosh Ahmadi
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Fugazza A, Galtieri PA, Repici A. Using stents in the management of malignant bowel obstruction: the current situation and future progress. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 11:633-641. [PMID: 28325090 DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2017.1309283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
The use of self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) has been considered an effective and safe alternative to emergency surgery as bridge to surgery or for palliation in advanced colorectal cancer even though more recent data have raised concerns on both early and long-term outcomes when patients are treated with bridge to surgery indications. Areas covered: A comprehensive literature review of articles on endoscopic management of malignant bowel obstruction was performed. Indication, technique, outcomes, benefits and risks of these treatments in acute malignant colonic obstruction were reviewed. The clinical effectiveness and safety of SEMS in obstructive colorectal cancer, as bridge to surgery or for palliation compared to surgery, is discussed. Expert commentary: SEMS placement, when performed in tertiary level center with appropriate expertise in colorectal stenting, may have several advantages over surgery avoiding the potential for surgical morbidity in a typically frail group of patients even though these advantages are to be carefully balanced over the risk of life-threatening, stent-related complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Fugazza
- a Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology , Humanitas Research Hospital , Rozzano , Italy
| | - Piera Alessia Galtieri
- a Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology , Humanitas Research Hospital , Rozzano , Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- a Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology , Humanitas Research Hospital , Rozzano , Italy.,b Academic Department of Bioscience , Humanitas University , Rozzano , Italy
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Amelung FJ, Draaisma WA, Consten ECJ, Siersema PD, ter Borg F. Self-expandable metal stent placement versus emergency resection for malignant proximal colon obstructions. Surg Endosc 2017; 31:4532-4541. [DOI: 10.1007/s00464-017-5512-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2016] [Accepted: 03/08/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|
50
|
Totikov ZV, Totikov VZ. [The possibilities to improve the outcomes in patients with colon cancer complicated by acute obstruction]. Khirurgiia (Mosk) 2017:17-23. [PMID: 28374709 DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia2017317-23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
AIM To improve the outcomes in patients with colon cancer complicated by acute obstruction via development of combined and complex treatment strategies. MATERIAL AND METHODS We observed 442 patients with colon cancer complicated with acute obstruction. Original classification and diagnostic algorithm were applied. RESULTS Time of preoperative opening-up, volume and type of surgery were defined using obtained data. Also we are able to perform delayed radical surgery after correction of metabolic disorders and comorbidities, to create the conditions for combined and complex methods of treatment, to decrease the incidence of postoperative complications and mortality rate. CONCLUSION Three-stage surgery with shortened time between interventions decreases the incidence of anastomosis failure, allows to refuse Hartmann's procedure and to avoid severe reconstructive surgical stage without prolongation of rehabilitation period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Z V Totikov
- North Ossetian State Medical Academy, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Vladikavkaz
| | - V Z Totikov
- North Ossetian State Medical Academy, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Vladikavkaz
| |
Collapse
|