1
|
Chang WJ, Tsao LC, Yen HH, Yang CW, Chang HC, Kor CT, Wu SC, Lin KH. Goldilocks principle of minimally invasive surgery for gastric subepithelial tumors. World J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 15:1629-1640. [PMID: 37701681 PMCID: PMC10494604 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i8.1629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Revised: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimally invasive surgery had been tailored to individual cases of gastric subepithelial tumors (SETs) after comparing the clinical outcomes of endoscopic resection (ER), laparoscopic resection (LR), and hybrid methods. AIM To study the use of Goldilocks principle to determine the best form of minimally invasive surgery for gastric SETs. METHODS In this retrospective study, 194 patients of gastric SETs with high probability of surgical intervention were included. All patients underwent tumor resection in the operating theater between January 2013 and December 2021. The patients were divided into two groups, ER or LR, according to the tumor characteristics and the initial intent of intervention. Few patients in the ER group required further backup laparoscopic surgery after an incomplete ER. The patients who had converted open surgery were excluded. A logistic regression model was used to assess the associations between patient characteristics and the likelihood of a treatment strategy. The area under the curve was used to assess the discriminative ability of tumor size and Youden's index to determine the optimal cut-off tumor size. RESULTS One-hundred ninety-four patients (100 in the ER group and 94 in the LR group) underwent tumor resection in the operating theater. In the ER group, 27 patients required backup laparoscopic surgery after an incomplete ER. The patients in the ER group had small tumor sizes and shorter procedure durations while the patients in the LR group had large tumor sizes, exophytic growth, malignancy, and tumors that were more often located in the middle or lower third of the stomach. Both groups had similar durations of hospital stays and a similar rate of major postoperative complications. The patients in the ER group who underwent backup surgery required longer procedures (56.4 min) and prolonged stays (2 d) compared to the patients in the LR group without the increased rate of major postoperative complications. The optimal cut-off point for the tumor size for laparoscopic surgery was 2.15 cm. CONCLUSION Multidisciplinary teamwork leads to the adoption of different strategies to yield efficient clinical outcomes according to the tumor characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei-Jung Chang
- Department of General Surgery, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua 50006, Taiwan
| | - Lien-Cheng Tsao
- Department of General Surgery, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua 50006, Taiwan
| | - Hsu-Heng Yen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua 50006, Taiwan
- General Education Center, Chienkuo Technology University, Changhua 50006, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung 40201, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Wei Yang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua 50006, Taiwan
| | - Hung-Chi Chang
- Department of General Surgery, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua 50006, Taiwan
| | - Chew-Teng Kor
- Big Data Center, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua 50006, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Statistics and Information Science, National Changhua University of Education, Changhua 50007, Taiwan
| | - Szu-Chia Wu
- Transplant Medicine & Surgery Research Center, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua 50006, Taiwan
| | - Kuo-Hua Lin
- Department of General Surgery, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua 50006, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yue L, Sun Y, Wang X, Hu W. Advances of endoscopic and surgical management in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Front Surg 2023; 10:1092997. [PMID: 37123546 PMCID: PMC10130460 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1092997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 03/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/02/2023] Open
Abstract
As one of the most common mesenchymal malignancies in the digestive system, gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) occur throughout the alimentary tract with diversified oncological characteristics. With the advent of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor era, the treatment regimens of patients with GISTs have been revolutionized and GISTs have become the paradigm of multidisciplinary therapy. However, surgery resection remains recognized as the potentially curative management for the radical resection and provided with favorable oncological outcomes. The existing available surgery algorithms in clinical practice primarily incorporate open procedure, and endoscopic and laparoscopic surgery together with combined operation techniques. The performance of various surgery methods often refers to the consideration of risk evaluation of recurrence and metastases; the degree of disease progression; size, location, and growth pattern of tumor; general conditions of selected patients; and indications and safety profile of various techniques. In the present review, we summarize the fundamental principle of surgery of GISTs based on risk assessment as well as tumor size, location, and degree of progress with an emphasis on the indications, strengths, and limitations of current surgery techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lei Yue
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Medical School, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yingchao Sun
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Medical School, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xinjie Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Medical School, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Weiling Hu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Medical School, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Institute of Gastroenterology, Zhejiang University (IGZJU), Hangzhou, China
- Zhejiang University Cancer Center, Hangzhou, China
- Correspondence: Weiling Hu
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Navarini D, Zago VS, Madalosso CAS, Fornari F. GIST
of the gastroesophageal junction: Laparoscopic resection with gastric preservation. ADVANCES IN DIGESTIVE MEDICINE 2021. [DOI: 10.1002/aid2.13230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Navarini
- Departamento de Gastroenterologiae Cirurgia Digestiva, Universidade de Passo Fundo Passo Fundo Brazil
- Serviço de Cirurgia, Hospital São Vicente de Paulo Passo Fundo Brazil
| | - Víctor Sánchez Zago
- Departamento de Gastroenterologiae Cirurgia Digestiva, Universidade de Passo Fundo Passo Fundo Brazil
| | | | - Fernando Fornari
- Departamento de Gastroenterologiae Cirurgia Digestiva, Universidade de Passo Fundo Passo Fundo Brazil
- Serviço de Cirurgia, Hospital São Vicente de Paulo Passo Fundo Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Supsamutchai C, Setthalikhit T, Wilasrusmee C, Ovartchaiyapong P, Jirasiritham J, Choikrua P, Hiranyatheb P. Wedge gastrectomy: Robot-assisted with a hand-sewn repair versus a laparoscopic linear stapler technique for gastric subepithelial tumors. LAPAROSCOPIC, ENDOSCOPIC AND ROBOTIC SURGERY 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.lers.2019.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
|
5
|
Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST): a Case Series and Current State of the Art in the Workup and Treatment of This Rare Disease. J Gastrointest Cancer 2020; 50:548-555. [PMID: 29192406 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-017-0034-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|
6
|
Luo X, Mori K, Peters TM. Advanced Endoscopic Navigation: Surgical Big Data, Methodology, and Applications. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2018; 20:221-251. [PMID: 29505729 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-062117-120917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Interventional endoscopy (e.g., bronchoscopy, colonoscopy, laparoscopy, cystoscopy) is a widely performed procedure that involves either diagnosis of suspicious lesions or guidance for minimally invasive surgery in a variety of organs within the body cavity. Endoscopy may also be used to guide the introduction of certain items (e.g., stents) into the body. Endoscopic navigation systems seek to integrate big data with multimodal information (e.g., computed tomography, magnetic resonance images, endoscopic video sequences, ultrasound images, external trackers) relative to the patient's anatomy, control the movement of medical endoscopes and surgical tools, and guide the surgeon's actions during endoscopic interventions. Nevertheless, it remains challenging to realize the next generation of context-aware navigated endoscopy. This review presents a broad survey of various aspects of endoscopic navigation, particularly with respect to the development of endoscopic navigation techniques. First, we investigate big data with multimodal information involved in endoscopic navigation. Next, we focus on numerous methodologies used for endoscopic navigation. We then review different endoscopic procedures in clinical applications. Finally, we discuss novel techniques and promising directions for the development of endoscopic navigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiongbiao Luo
- Department of Computer Science, Fujian Key Laboratory of Computing and Sensing for Smart City, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China;
| | - Kensaku Mori
- Department of Intelligent Systems, Graduate School of Informatics, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan;
| | - Terry M Peters
- Robarts Research Institute, Western University, London, Ontario N6A 3K7, Canada;
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ismael H, Ragoza Y, Caccitolo J, Cox S. Optimal management of GIST tumors located near the gastroesophageal junction: Case report and review of the literature. Int J Surg Case Rep 2016; 25:91-6. [PMID: 27343733 PMCID: PMC4925912 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2016.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2016] [Revised: 05/27/2016] [Accepted: 06/13/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
There are several endoscopic, laparoscopic and open surgical procedures available for the management of GIST tumors near the GE junction. We present a case-report utilizing both endoscopy and laparoscopy to facilitate resection using the non-touch lesion-lifting technique. Pathology demonstrated a 4.7 cm GIST. The patient was discharged on post-operative day 3 with no complications. We include a full literature review and describe the various combined modalities available for successful resection. Introduction The safety and oncologic outcome of laparoscopic gastric GIST resection is well established especially for lesions <5 cm in diameter. The optimal management of GIST tumors near the GE junction remains unclear. Methods We present a case-report of a 4.7 cm GIST tumor near the GE junction managed by endoscopically-assisted laparoscopic wedge resection (EAWR). We present a review of the literature highlighting the various combined laparo-endoscopic techniques available. Results We used the non-touch lesion-lifting method to laparoscopically resect the GIST tumor under endoscopic guidance. There were no complications and the patient was discharged on postoperative day 3. Conclusions Endoscopically-assisted laparoscopic wedge resections are feasible and safe for GIST tumors near the GE junction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hishaam Ismael
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Tyler, Tyler, TX, USA.
| | - Yury Ragoza
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Tyler, Tyler, TX, USA
| | - James Caccitolo
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Tyler, Tyler, TX, USA
| | - Steven Cox
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Tyler, Tyler, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kim SY, Kim KO. Management of gastric subepithelial tumors: The role of endoscopy. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 8:418-424. [PMID: 27298713 PMCID: PMC4896903 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i11.418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2016] [Revised: 04/28/2016] [Accepted: 05/27/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
With the wide use of esophagogastroduodenoscopy, the incidence of gastric subepithelial tumor (SET) diagnosis has increased. While the management of large or symptomatic gastric SETs is obvious, treatment of small (≤ 3 cm) asymptomatic gastric SETs remains inconclusive. Moreover, the presence of gastrointestinal stromal tumors with malignant potential is of concern, and endoscopic treatment of gastric SETs remains a subject of debate. Recently, numerous studies have demonstrated the feasibility of endoscopic treatment of gastric SETs, and have proposed various endoscopic procedures including endoscopic submucosal dissection, endoscopic muscularis dissection, endoscopic enucleation, endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection, endoscopic full-thickness resection, and a hybrid approach (the combination of endoscopy and laparoscopy). In this review article, we discuss current endoscopic treatments for gastric SETs as well as the advantages and limitations of this type of therapy. Finally, we predict the availability of newly developed endoscopic treatments for gastric SETs.
Collapse
|