Evaluation of deep remission in Crohn's disease (CD) can be challenging when the disease is confined to the small intestine. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of through-the-scope EUS during double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE-EUS) in distinguishing small-bowel CD patients in endoscopic remission from those with active disease.

Patients who underwent DBE-EUS were divided into groups of endoscopic remission and endoscopic activity according to segmental Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD). The thickness of small intestinal wall layers and other parameters were evaluated by EUS.

EUS using an ultrasonic catheter probe by DBE showed that the total wall thickness (TWT) and submucosal thickness (SMT) of the small intestine in the active group were significantly greater than those in the remission group (3.84 ± 1.02 mm vs 2.42 ± .25 mm and 1.23 ± .34 mm vs .79 ± .13 mm, respectively; P < .001). Cutoff values of 2.65 mm for TWT and .95 mm for SMT can distinguish active small-bowel CD from inactive disease (sensitivity 91.5% and specificity 80.8% and sensitivity 70.2% and specificity 88.6%, respectively). The correlation analysis revealed a significant positive correlation between TWT and SES-CD (r =.930, P < .001). Furthermore, TWT was strongly correlated with fecal calprotectin (r = .861, P < .001) and Crohn's Disease Activity Index (r = .805, P < .001). Similar results were observed for SMT.

EUS using an ultrasonic catheter probe during DBE is effective in evaluation of both mucosal and transmural healing in small-bowel CD patients. DBE-EUS could become an important tool in the management of patients with small-bowel CD.

Fecal calprotectin (Fcal) and intestinal ultrasonography (IUS) could be used as noninvasive tools to monitor mucosal and transmural healing, respectively, in Crohn's disease (CD). We assessed the agreement between Fcal and IUS to detect active CD and investigated their complementary to predict long-term CD outcomes.

In this prospective study, we consecutively included CD patients with concomitant IUS and Fcal testing within 7 days. Patients were divided into 4 groups: Transmural healing (TH; both normal), IUS healing (Fcal > 100 µg/g but normal IUS), biochemical remission reflecting mucosal healing (MH; Fcal < 100 µg/g but abnormal IUS), and no healing (abnormal Fcal and IUS). The primary endpoint was active CD. The secondary endpoints were time to bowel damage progression, time to relapse-related drug discontinuation, and patients' acceptability (10-points acceptability numerical scale).

Among the included 112 patients, 44.6% (50/112), 12.5% (14/112),16.1% (18/112), and 26.8% (30/122) achieved TH, IUS healing, biochemical remission, and no healing, respectively. The agreement between IUS and Fcal to detect an active CD was poor (71.4%, κ-coefficient = 0.41 ± 0.09). Transmural healing was associated with a reduced risk of bowel damage progression compared to no healing (P < .0001) contrary to IUS healing (P = .15) or biochemical remission (P = .84). Transmural healing was associated with a lower risk of relapse-related drug discontinuation than MH (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.09 [0.02-0.45], P = .003), IUS healing (HR = 0.10 [0.02-0.60], P = .001), or no healing (HR = 0.09 [0.018-0.04], P = .002). IUS was better accepted than Fcal testing (9.6 ± 0.8 vs 7.9 ± 2.3; P < .0001, 10-points range-acceptability numerical scale).

Transmural healing, evaluated by the combination of noninvasive and well-accepted tools such as Fcal and IUS, is associated with improved long-term outcomes and could be used to monitor patients with CD in daily practice.

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), including Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), are chronic inflammatory conditions requiring continuous monitoring. Today, endoscopy is the gold standard for assessing disease activity, with histological evaluation providing additional insights. Studies suggest that persistent histological inflammation, despite endoscopic remission, may be associated with a higher risk of relapse in UC, suggesting its role in treatment decisions. In CD, histological assessment is limited by its patchy nature, transmural inflammation and lack of validated scoring systems. Few retrospective studies with conflicting results have examined the prognostic value of histological remission in CD, and its role in predicting long-term outcomes remains unclear. This narrative review aims to summarize and discuss the available evidence regarding the additional value of histological assessment in IBD management. In UC, the ongoing VERDICT study is expected to provide evidence on the impact of incorporating histological remission as a treatment target compared to a strategy based on clinical and endoscopic activity. Recently published interim results indicate that targeting histological remission does not lead to better clinical/biochemical disease activity. Thus, while patients achieving histological healing are associated with better outcomes, the question arises whether achieving histological remission is an intrinsic (biological) characteristic of the patient and indicator of an easier to treat patient group or a result of more effective therapy.

Inflammatory bowel diseases with the 2 main forms - ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease - are chronic relapsing diseases of the gastrointestinal tract in which dysregulation of the intestinal immune system against commensal components of the microbiome leads to perpetuated intestinal inflammation based on a genetic predisposition. While in the past symptom control was the focus of therapy, more recent data show that achieving endoscopic remission is superior to sole clinical symptom control for the further course and prognosis of the diseases. In this review article, we will present the significance of endoscopy for inflammatory bowel diseases, describe established scoring systems for endoscopic graduation of inflammatory activity and, last but not least, also present and review new endoscopic developments.

Mucosal healing (MH) is a key therapeutic target in Crohn's disease (CD) and is associated with improved outcomes. While adult studies indicate a positive correlation between serum anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) levels and MH, data in pediatric patients is limited. We aimed to define the association of serum anti-TNF levels with MH in pediatric patients with CD during maintenance therapy.

Retrospective data (2014-2023) was collected from pediatric CD patients treated with infliximab or adalimumab who performed an ileocolonoscopy at least 26 weeks after initiating therapy. Serum anti-TNF levels around endoscopic time were compared with endoscopic findings. MH was defined as complete absence of inflammatory or ulcerative lesions across all segments of the gastrointestinal tract. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with MH.

Data were obtained from 107 patients (41 infliximab and 66 adalimumab), with a median age at diagnosis of 12.6 (9.9-14.0) years. Median time until ileocolonoscopy following anti-TNF initiation was 89.0 (56.3-152.3) weeks. MH was identified in 31 (29.0%) patients. Anti-TNF serum levels were comparable in the MH and non-MH groups (9.5 [4.9-13.9] vs. 9.3 [6.4-15.7] µg/mL; p = 0.73), without differences in patients treated with infliximab or adalimumab. In multivariable analysis, diagnosis weight Z-score (odds ratio [OR] = 2.860, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.005-8.138; p = 0.049), along with C-reactive protein (OR = 0.037, 95% CI = 0.002-0.687; p = 0.027) and fecal calprotectin (OR = 0.995, 95% CI = 0.990-1.000; p = 0.037) at time of ileocolonoscopy were significantly associated with MH.

In our cohort, anti-TNF levels during maintenance were not associated with MH in pediatric CD.

Endoscopic scoring indices for ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease are subject to inter-endoscopist variability. There is increasing interest in the development of deep learning models to standardize endoscopic assessment of intestinal diseases. Here, we summarize and critically appraise the literature on artificial intelligence-assisted endoscopic characterization of inflammatory bowel disease severity.

A systematic search of Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and IEEE Xplore was performed to identify reports of AI systems used for endoscopic severity classification of IBD. Selected studies were critically appraised for methodological and reporting quality using APPRAISE-AI.

Thirty-one studies published between 2019 and 2024 were included. Of 31 studies, 28 studies examined endoscopic classification of ulcerative colitis and 3 examined Crohn's disease. Researchers sought to accomplish a wide range of classification tasks, including binary and multilevel classification, based on still images or full-length colonoscopy videos. Overall scores for study quality ranged from 41 (moderate quality) to 64 (high quality) out of 100, with 28 out of 31 studies within the moderate quality range. The highest-scoring domains were clinical relevance and reporting quality, while the lowest-scoring domains were robustness of results and reproducibility.

Multiple AI models have demonstrated the potential for clinical translation for ulcerative colitis. Research concerning the endoscopic severity assessment of Crohn's disease is limited and should be further explored. More rigorous external validation of AI models and increased transparency of data and codes are needed to improve the quality of AI studies.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) incidence and prevalence has been increasing worldwide. Limited data exists on the effectiveness of ustekinumab (UST) in children. We aimed to describe the effectiveness and safety of UST in pediatric patients with IBD.

A single-center retrospective study was conducted between January 2017 and February 2022. The study included patients ≤16 years of age who were treated with UST and followed up for ≥1 year. Clinical remission was defined as a score of the Pediatric Crohn's Disease (CD) and Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis (UC) Activity Indices ≤10 at week 52.

Thirteen patients who had failed anti-tumor necrosis factor-α (anti-TNFα) therapy were included, eight (61.5%) with CD and five (38.5%) with UC. The median age was 13 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 11.5 to 14). UST treatment was initiated at a median age of 3 years (IQR: 2.3 to 7) after diagnosis. Ten patients (76.9%) achieved clinical remission. There were no statistically significant differences in characteristics between patients who achieved and did not achieve clinical remission. Biochemical remission (BioR) was achieved in six patients (46.2%). Body mass index (BMI) significantly improved, C-reactive protein (CRP) significantly decreased, and the need for corticosteroids significantly decreased in the remission group. Endoscopy conducted post-treatment in seven patients confirmed remission in six patients. Adverse events included two cases of infection and one of headache.

UST was effective as a secondary biologic therapy for the induction and maintenance of remission in patients with anti-TNFα refractory IBD. At one year, 84% of patients remained on UST with no severe adverse reactions reported.

Mucosal healing (MH) is a crucial indicator of therapeutic effectiveness and prognosis in Crohn's disease (CD). Rapid achievement and long-term maintenance of MH can alleviate the financial and psychological burden on patients. This study aimed to investigate the factors associated with MH in CD patients and enhance clinicians' understanding.

Patients diagnosed with CD between January 2010 and December 2019 at our hospital were included and divided into two groups based on the attainment of MH during the follow-up period. Demographic data, symptoms, disease classification, laboratory examination results, and treatments were collected and compared between the two groups. Factors with a P-value <0.2 were subjected to multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify the related factors of MH.

Multivariate logistic regression analysis of CD patients revealed that educational level [odds ratio (OR) = 8.167, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.440-46.303, P = 0.018] and biological therapy (OR = 15.291, 95 % CI 1.404-166.543, P = 0.025) were associated with MH.

Educational level and biological therapy are factors related to MH in CD patients. These findings suggest that the use of biological therapy and patients' better understanding of the disease contribute to achieving MH.

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) including Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) are chronic, relapsing conditions characterized by dysregulated immune responses and persistent intestinal inflammation. This review aims to examine new potential therapeutic targets in IBD starting from the STRIDE-II statements. Key targets now include clinical remission, endoscopic remission, and biomarker normalization (such as C-reactive protein and fecal calprotectin). Moreover, histologic remission, transmural remission, and in the future molecular targets are emerging as important indicators of sustained disease control. The treatment goals for inflammatory bowel disease are varied: to relieve symptoms, prevent permanent intestinal damage, promote inflammation remission, and minimize complications. Consequently, the therapeutic targets have evolved to become broader and more ambitious. Integrating these advanced therapeutic targets has the potential to redefine IBD management by promoting deeper disease control and improved patient outcomes. Further research is essential to validate these strategies and optimize their clinical implementation.

Despite a wide range of available treatments, there is limited evidence as to why significant numbers of Crohn's disease (CD) patients do not achieve disease remission or continue to have residual symptom burden. We aimed to quantify the impact of this suboptimal treatment on patient symptom incidence and severity, quality of life (QoL), and work impairment.

Data were derived from the Adelphi Real World CD Disease Specific Programme, a cross-sectional survey of CD patients and their treating physicians in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the United Kingdom, and the United States between January 2020 and March 2021. Physicians reported on patients' clinical history, disease status, symptom load, and treatment. Patients reported their QoL and activity impairment using the EQ-5D-5L and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment measures. Patients were divided into remitters, partial remitters, and non-remitters. Multivariate regression models were used to assess the impact of remission status on clinical and QoL outcomes.

Of 1786 patients, 24.1% were remitters, 53.2% were partial remitters, and 22.7% were non-remitters. Partial remitters and non-remitters had a significantly higher symptom load than remitters (P < .05), and non-remitters were up to 15 times more likely to experience key symptoms than remitters. Both non-remitters and partial remitters were also significantly more likely to have increased symptom severity (P < .05). Non-remitters were more likely to have switched treatment and received more treatment lines, as well as having significantly worse QoL, than remitters.

Suboptimal treatment response was associated with increased symptoms and QoL burden. Despite the increased burden experienced, partial remitters were not more likely to switch or receive more treatment lines than remitters, demonstrating the need to initiate effective therapy.

A significant proportion of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients fail to respond to advanced therapies. Combining advanced therapies may improve treatment outcome. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness, adverse events, and costs associated with combining advanced therapies in IBD patients.

Combination advanced therapy was defined as the concurrent use of two biological agents or one biological agent with a small molecule therapy. Clinical data, including disease characteristics, treatment regimens, and adverse events, were collected from electronic patient records. Clinical response rates, biochemical markers, and treatment costs were evaluated.

The study included 109 IBD patients receiving combination advanced therapies from 9 academic centers in Ireland. Corticosteroid-free clinical response rates at 12 weeks and 52 weeks were 39 % and 38 %, respectively. Adverse events occurred in 26 % of therapeutic trials, with disease-related events being the most common. Notably, there were 3 cases of non-melanomatous skin cancer and 10 infectious complications. The annual cost of maintenance therapy for combination advanced therapies ranged from €17,560 to €30,724 per patient.

Combination advanced therapies demonstrated effectiveness and acceptable safety profiles in a cohort of treatment-refractory IBD patients. Further large, prospective trials are required to definitively evaluate the role of combination advanced therapies in IBD.

The advantages of endoscopic vs histologic assessments of inflammation in inflammatory bowel disease remain unclear. We compared endoscopic and histologic inflammation in a prospective cohort. Furthermore, in patients with discordant findings, we compared the ability of endoscopy vs histology to predict disease course.

Ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn's disease (CD) patients underwent routine colonoscopies with intestinal biopsies, which included ratings of inflammation severity. Tetrachoric correlation analysis between the endoscopic and histologic inflammation ratings was performed. In postsurgical CD patients, major adverse outcomes (MAOs) were recorded.

The analysis included 749 patients (60.2% CD patients), with 2807 biopsied segments. We found high concordance between endoscopist and pathologist inflammation ratings (0.84, 95% confidence interval, 0.81-0.87, p < 0.0001). Only 12.5% of biopsied segments exhibited microscopic inflammation without endoscopic inflammation. Neo-terminal ileum (neo-TI) biopsies exhibited the highest discordance; UC colonic biopsies had the highest concordance. Postsurgical CD patients who completed the 48-month follow-up (n = 138) were included in the survival analysis. The probability of MAO-free survival was significantly higher in patients with a Rutgeerts score of i0 at baseline than in those with higher scores. Microscopic inflammation in the neo-TI did not predict a higher risk of MAOs (p = 1.00).

In a real-world setting, endoscopic inflammation predicted histologic inflammation with high accuracy. In patients with a Rutgeerts score of i0, microscopic inflammation in neo-TI biopsies did not predict more aggressive disease behavior over the next 4 years. These results have implications for the design of clinical trials, suggesting the use of endoscopic healing as an endpoint.

Transmural healing, including as assessed by magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) has been associated with long-term favorable outcomes in Crohn's Disease (CD), but data concerning MRE improvement and normalization with therapy are sparse. We performed a prospective longitudinal study utilizing the recently developed pediatric MRE-based multi-item measure of inflammation (PICMI) to examine the efficacy of adalimumab (ADA) and immunomodulator (IM) in attaining improvement of transmural inflammation of the small intestine.

Pediatric patients with CD involving small bowel and initiating ADA or IM were prospectively enrolled and followed with repeat MRE at 1 year. A single radiologist provided global assessment (RGA) and scored PICMI items (wall thickness, wall diffusion restriction, mural ulcers, comb sign, mesenteric edema) blinded to clinical information and to the timing of MRE. The primary outcome was mild improvement in PICMI at one year without a change in therapy.

Sixty-two eligible patients were enrolled, 26 receiving ADA and 36 IM. On intent to treat basis, a decline in PICMI score of >20 points without change of therapy was observed more frequently in ADA versus IM-treated patients (54% vs 31%, P = .01). By RGA, 71% improved with ADA vs 42% with IM (P = .03). MRE normalization was rare with both treatments (9% vs 6%, P = .62). A change in PICMI of >20 points was confirmed as the best cut off for MRE improvement as assessed by RGA also for the small bowel.

ADA therapy was associated with objective improvement in MRE findings of inflammation more frequently than IM. The low rate of MRE normalization suggests that this is not yet a realistic target with existing therapies.

Standardized evaluation of endoscopic disease activity using valid, responsive and reliable instruments is crucial for optimizing the efficiency of clinical trials with therapeutic agents for Crohn's disease (CD). Achieving endoscopic remission and/or mucosal healing is associated with improved long-term outcomes, making it an important treatment goal.

Several endoscopic indices have been used over the past two decades, though they lack complete validation. The Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity (CDEIS) and Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) demonstrate fair reliability and responsiveness to treatment. The CDEIS is rather complex and time-consuming, and both endoscopic indices are prone to variability. The Lewis Score and Capsule Endoscopy CD Activity Index (CECDAI) provide useful alternative instruments using video capsule endoscopy, but they need further validation. The Rutgeerts score predicts post-surgical recurrence but lacks evaluation for follow-up.

While recent guidelines emphasize co-primary clinical and endoscopic endpoints to improve trial effectiveness, these are typically based on expert consensus rather than empirical data. We advocate to use SES-CD as the preferred endoscopic index given its simplicity, strong correlation with CDEIS, and treatment responsiveness. Future research should focus on establishing clinically relevant cutoff values for endoscopic response and endoscopic remission in CD trials, including post-operative settings.

Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease affecting the entire gastrointestinal tract with a progressive and relapsing course. Achieving mucosal healing has emerged as a critical therapeutic goal, as it is associated with sustained clinical remission, reduced hospitalizations, and fewer surgery rates. Therefore, targeting mucosal healing is essential for long-term control in CD.

This review evaluates the efficacy of novel biologic therapies and small molecules in inducing mucosal healing, specifically targeting pathways like IL-12/23, IL-23, α4β7 integrins, Janus kinase 1 (JAK1), and sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor (S1PR) in adults (≥18 years) with moderate-to-severe CD. The rationale for selecting these specific pathways is their central role in modulating key inflammatory processes implicated in CD pathogenesis. We compare these therapies with placebo for both induction and maintenance of remission, based on a PubMed literature review for published articles and ClinicalTrials.gov for ongoing trials.

Upadacitinib and anti-IL23p19 agents (risankizumab, guselkumab and mirikizumab) are promising advanced non-TNF-targeting therapies for inducing endoscopic remission and mucosal healing but further studies are needed to integrate mucosal healing into a broader definition of endoscopic response, with a unified and precise definition.

The role of ustekinumab therapeutic drug monitoring in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) remains ambiguous. Examination of the association serum ustekinumab concentrations and endoscopic outcomes has yielded inconsistent results. Our study examined whether serum ustekinumab concentrations were associated with endoscopic healing in patients with moderate-to-severe CD.

This was a cross-sectional study of adult patients with CD on maintenance ustekinumab. Patients were included if they had serum ustekinumab concentrations and endoscopic evaluation taken within 4 months of each other. Endoscopic healing was defined as absence of ulceration on endoscopy or Simplified Endoscopic Score for Crohn's disease (SES-CD) < 3. Quartile analysis of drug levels was performed, and receiver operating characteristic curve was calculated. Multivariate logistic regression assessed for the probability of endoscopic healing based on serum ustekinumab concentration.

Seventy-four patients were included in the final analysis. The mean serum ustekinumab concentration of the population was 6.10 mcg/mL. Serum ustekinumab concentration did not predict endoscopic remission based on either the absence of ulceration or SES-CD < 3. There was no difference in the frequency of ulceration at increasing serum ustekinumab concentrations. There was no threshold serum ustekinumab concentration associated with the absence of ulceration (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.50) or SES-CD < 3 (AUC = 0.49).

Our study found no association between serum ustekinumab concentrations and endoscopic remission in patients with CD. Exploration of mechanisms accounting for this lack of association is warranted.

Histologic evaluation of mucosal healing in Crohn's disease is an evolving treatment target. We evaluated histologic outcomes for mirikizumab efficacy and associations with endoscopic and 1-year outcomes.

Biopsy specimens from 1 ileal and 4 colonic segments were evaluated at weeks 0, 12, and 52 from each of the 170 SERENITY participants. Criteria for the weeks 12 and 52 histologic response were no epithelial neutrophils or epithelial damage, or >50% decrease in either the Robarts Histopathology Index or the active Global Histologic Disease Activity Score, and remission (no mucosal neutrophils and no epithelial damage) had to be met in all biopsy specimens. Agreement was evaluated between histologic and endoscopic end points. Associations between 1-year outcomes and week 12 histologic and endoscopic response were evaluated.

At week 12, 1000 mg mirikizumab resulted in greater rates of histologic response (66% vs 27%; P < .001) and remission (26% vs 6%; P < .01) than placebo. Rates were numerically similar at 1 year (mirikizumab pooled response, 46%-69%; remission, 13%-31%). Agreement between week 12 histologic and endoscopic response was 69% (Cohen's kappa coefficient [κ] = 0.40) and remission was 83% (κ = 0.38) in all pooled arms, including placebo. At 1 year, the percentage of participants who received any dose of mirikizumab and achieved endoscopic remission differed by their week 12 response: histologic (20%), endoscopic (25%), combined histology-endoscopy (45%), or neither (4%) (P = .003).

In a post hoc analysis of phase 2 data, mirikizumab induced and sustained histologic response and remission in Crohn's disease over 52 weeks. Early combined histologic-endoscopic response was associated with endoscopic remission after 1 year of treatment with mirikizumab (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02891226).

Background: Current management of mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis (UC) involves monitoring clinical markers of disease activity, such as stool frequency (SF) and rectal bleeding (RB), and adjusting treatment accordingly. Our aim was to assess whether targeting treatment based on faecal calprotectin (FC) levels (treat-to-target; T2T) provides greater UC disease control versus a symptom-based approach. Methods: This was a pragmatic, randomised (1:1) controlled study of patients with mild-to-moderate UC (global Mayo score 2-6) treated with ≤2.4 g/day 5-aminosalicylic acid that compared the effectiveness of two management strategies with (interventional arm) and without (reference arm) FC home monitoring over 12 months of follow-up. Treatment was optimised in the interventional arm using FC values and clinical symptoms (PRO-2), while the reference arm used only PRO-2. Results: 193 patients completed the study. No significant difference was found for the primary endpoint (Mayo Endoscopic Subscore [MES] = 0 at 12 months). A numerical advantage for the interventional arm over the reference arm for the primary endpoint (37.0% vs. 33.4%, respectively) and for MES ≤ 1, RB = 0, and SF ≤ 1 at 12 months was found following imputation for missing data. The composite endpoint of MES = 0, RB = 0, and SF ≤ 1 at 12 months was achieved at a significantly higher rate in the interventional arm than the reference arm (effect size [ES]: 0.17, 95% CI 0.02-0.32; p < 0.05). A similar result was obtained for MES ≤ 1, RB = 0 and SF ≤ 1 (ES: 0.22; 95% CI 0.07-0.37; p < 0.05). Conclusions: T2T using FC monitoring was effective in patients with mild-to-moderate UC at 12 months. Further longer-term studies are required to confirm the results.

Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis (UC) are inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) characterized by a progressive nature of the disease resulting in subsequent intestinal damage, limited efficacy of current treatments and suboptimal disease management and a significant burden for patients.

The IBD-PODCAST study aims to estimate the proportion of Crohn's disease and UC patients with suboptimal disease control (SDC) in a real-world setting.

A non-interventional and cross-sectional study was conducted across 103 sites in 10 countries (Austria, Belgium, Canada, Germany, Greece, Italy, Portugal, Spain, Turkey, and UK). Criteria for SDC were based on STRIDE-II criteria and adapted by an expert panel.

2185 patients (Crohn's disease: n = 1,108, UC: n = 1077) with a mean (SD) age of 44.0 (14.8) years and mean (SD) disease duration of 12.4 (9.2) years were included (52.2% male). Ileal involvement was present in 39.1% of Crohn's disease patients, 35.3% of UC patients had extensive colitis. 77.3% of Crohn's disease and 65.3% of UC patients were on targeted immunomodulators and, according to STRIDE-II-based treatment phases, 85.6% of Crohn's disease and 85.4% of UC patients were assigned to the long-term treatment phase. SDC was detected in 52.2% of Crohn's disease and 44.3% of UC patients predominantly due to impaired quality of life (QoL), clinically significant extraintestinal manifestations, steroid overuse, signs of active inflammation in UC and Crohn's disease, and active fistulas in Crohn's disease. More than one criterion was seen in 37% of patients with SDC. Opportunities for on-label treatment optimization were observed in 49% of Crohn's disease and 61% of UC patients on advanced therapy.

The high percentage of SDC in this global, real-world cohort suggests a large disease burden and high unmet medical need in IBD patients. Future analysis should focus on monitoring and responding to SDC in this cohort and on patients' QoL.

Mucosal healing (MH) has become a perspective treatment target in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). Data about the impact of MH on long-term outcome in pediatric patients are still scarce.

Seventy-six pediatric patients with CD were evaluated retrospectively (2000-2015) in a tertiary care center. Based on MH achievement, they were divided into two groups (MH, N.=17; and No MH, N.=59). The primary endpoint was to assess the association of MH and the need for CD-related hospitalizations or surgery in pediatric patients with CD.

The number of hospitalized patients was 24% in the MH group and 42% in the No MH group (P=0.26). The total number of CD-related hospitalizations was not significant between the MH group and the No MH group (5 vs. 41, P=0.15). The time to the first hospitalization was 24 months in MH and 21 months in No MH (P>0.99). About 24% of the patients in the MH group and 39% patients in the No MH group underwent CD-related operation (P=0.39). Time to the first operation was 43 months for MH and 19 months for the No MH group (P=0.13). The follow-up period was 91 months in the MH group and 80 months in the No MH group (P=0.74). The use of infliximab was positively associated with MH (P=0.002).

MH was not associated with fewer CD-related hospitalizations or operations in pediatric patients with CD during seven years of follow-up.

We conducted a network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of advanced therapies for achieving endoscopic outcomes in patients with moderate-to-severely active Crohn's disease.

MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched from inception to August 2, 2023 to identify phase II and III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in adults (≥18 years) with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease treated with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists, etrolizumab, vedolizumab, anti-interleukin (IL)12/23p40, anti-IL23p19, or Janus kinase-1 (JAK1) inhibitors, compared with placebo/active comparator, for induction and/or maintenance of remission and reported endoscopic outcomes. Primary outcome was endoscopic response after induction therapy, and endoscopic remission after maintenance therapy. We performed a random-effects network meta-analysis using a frequentist approach, and estimated relative risk (RRs), 95% confidence interval (CI) values, and P score for ranking agents. We used GRADE to ascertain certainty of evidence.

A total of 20 RCTs (19 placebo-controlled and 1 head-to-head trial; 5592 patients) were included out of which 12 RCTs reported endoscopic outcomes for the induction phase, 5 reported for the maintenance phase, and 3 reported for both induction and maintenance phases. JAK1 inhibitors (RR, 3·49 [95% CI, 1·48-8·26]) and anti-IL23p19 (RR, 2·30 [95% CI, 1·02-5·18]) agents were more efficacious than etrolizumab (moderate certainty of evidence), and JAK1 inhibitors (RR, 2·34 [95% CI, 1·14-4·80]) were more efficacious than anti-IL12/23p40 agents for inducing endoscopic response (moderate certainty of evidence). JAK1 inhibitors and anti-IL23p19 ranked highest for induction of endoscopic response. There was paucity of RCTs of TNF antagonists reporting endoscopic outcomes with induction therapy. On network meta-analysis of 6 RCTs, all agents except vedolizumab (RR, 1.89 [95% CI, 0.61-5.92]) were effective in maintaining endoscopic remission compared with placebo. TNF antagonists, IL12/23p40, and JAK1 inhibitors were ranked highest.

On network meta-analysis, JAK1 inhibitors and anti-IL23p19 agents may be the most effective among non-TNF-targeting advanced therapies for inducing endoscopic response. Future head-to-head trials will further inform positioning of different therapies for the management of Crohn's disease.

Precise estimates of placebo response rates help efficient clinical trial design. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we assessed contemporary placebo endoscopic and histological response rates in Crohn's disease (CD) clinical trials.

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched from inception to April 2022 to identify placebo-controlled studies of pharmacological interventions for CD. Endoscopic response, remission, and mucosal healing rates for participants assigned to placebo in induction and maintenance studies were pooled using a random-effects model. Point estimates and associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

In total, 16 studies (11 induction, 3 maintenance, 2 induction and maintenance) that randomized 1646 participants to placebo were eligible. For induction trials, the pooled placebo endoscopic response, endoscopic remission, and mucosal healing rates in participants assigned to placebo were 13% (95% CI, 10-16; I2 = 14.1%; P = .14), 6% (95% CI, 3-11; I2 = 74.7%; P < .001), and 6% (95% CI, 4-9; I2 = 26.9%; P = .29), respectively. The pooled endoscopic remission rate in patients who were bio-naïve was 10% (95% CI, 4-23) compared with only 4% (95% CI, 3-7) in bio-experienced patients. For maintenance trials, the pooled endoscopic response, remission, and mucosal healing rates were 7% (95% CI, 1-31; I2 = 78.2%; P = .004), 11% (95% CI, 4-27; I2 = 70.8%; P = .06), and 7% (95% CI, 3-15; I2 = 29.7; P = .23), respectively. Only 3 trials assessed histological outcomes.

Endoscopic placebo rates vary according to trial phase and prior biologic exposure. These contemporary data will serve to inform CD trial design, sample size calculation, and end point selection for future trials.

Endoscopic mucosal healing serves as a critical predictor for achieving long-term remission in Crohn's disease treatment. Recent data indicate that the effectiveness of healing varies based on the location of gastrointestinal inflammation. Additionally, reports suggest that antitumor necrosis factor-α (anti-TNF-α) agents exhibit reduced efficacy in treating small intestinal inflammation compared to colorectal inflammation. Conversely, limited research exists regarding the impact of the anti-IL12/23 agent ustekinumab (UST) on small intestinal inflammation. This study aimed to compare the effects of anti-TNF-α agents and UST on small intestinal inflammation using propensity score analysis.

This retrospective observational study involved 70 patients with Crohn's disease who had inflammation in the small intestine and had initiated treatment with either anti-TNF agents or UST between March 2015 and August 2021. Endoscopic findings were evaluated before treatment commencement and at 1-2 years post-treatment initiation. The propensity score was employed to compare the efficacy of TNF agents and UST on small bowel inflammation.

Ustekinumab exhibited greater improvement in the small intestinal endoscopy score than anti-TNF-α antibodies according to the propensity score analysis (inverse probability weighting; P = .0448). However, no significant disparity was observed in the overall improvement of endoscopic scores between UST and anti-TNF-α antibodies (P = .5938).

This study suggests that UST might be more effective than anti-TNF-α agents in treating small intestinal inflammation in Crohn's disease.

Dysbiosis of the gut microbiota is considered a key contributor to inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) etiology. Here, we investigated potential associations between microbiota composition and the outcomes to biological therapies.

The study prospectively recruited 296 patients with active IBD (203 with Crohn's disease, 93 with ulcerative colitis) initiating biological therapy. Quantitative microbiome profiles of pretreatment and posttreatment fecal samples were obtained combining flow cytometry with 16S amplicon sequencing. Therapeutic response was assessed by endoscopy, patient-reported outcomes, and changes in fecal calprotectin. The effect of therapy on microbiome variation was evaluated using constrained ordination methods. Prediction of therapy outcome was performed using logistic regression with 5-fold cross-validation.

At baseline, 65.9% of patients carried the dysbiotic Bacteroides2 (Bact2) enterotype, with a significantly higher prevalence among patients with ileal involvement (76.8%). Microbiome variation was associated with the choice of biological therapy rather than with therapeutic outcome. Only anti-tumor necrosis factor-α treatment resulted in a microbiome shift away from Bact2, concomitant with an increase in microbial load and butyrogen abundances and a decrease in potentially opportunistic Veillonella. Remission rates for patients hosting Bact2 at baseline were significantly higher with anti-tumor necrosis factor-α than with vedolizumab (65.1% vs 35.2%). A prediction model, based on anthropometrics and clinical data, stool features (microbial load, moisture, and calprotectin), and Bact2 detection predicted treatment outcome with 73.9% accuracy for specific biological therapies.

Fecal characterization based on microbial load, moisture content, calprotectin concentration, and enterotyping may aid in the therapeutic choice of biological therapy in IBD.

Patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) require proactive monitoring both during the active phase to evaluate therapeutic response and during the remission phase to evaluate relapse or colorectal cancer surveillance. However, monitoring may vary between patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), with distinct tools and intervals.

This narrative review aims to focus on modern approaches to IBD monitoring, considering international guidelines and expert consensus.

The most recent European diagnostic guidelines advocate a combination of clinical, laboratory, endoscopic, and radiological parameters to evaluate the disease course of patients with IBD. Unfortunately, the conventional symptom-based therapeutic approach does not improve long-term outcomes and there is no single ideal biomarker available. Endoscopy plays a key role in evaluating response to therapy as well as monitoring disease activity. Recently, bedside intestinal ultrasound (IUS) has gained increasing interest and diffusion as it appears to offer several advantages including the monitoring of therapeutic response.

In light of growing clinical advances, we present a schematic evidence-based monitoring algorithm that can be easily applied in clinical practice which combines all major monitoring modalities, including noninvasive tools such as IUS and video-capsule endoscopy.

Confocal endomicroscopy is a technique allowing the in vivo assessment of the superficial layers of the mucosa. Preliminary studies have already suggested its added value in the assessment of endoscopic remission in inflammatory bowel disease. However, most of these studies were performed on patients still having incomplete mucosal healing. Our aim was to disclose persisting endomicroscopic anomalies in patients with full endoscopic remission and to compare them between vedolizumab- and anti-tumor necrosis factor-treated patients.

We screened patients with Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) treated for more than 6 months with biologic therapy, and being in steroid-free clinical and biological remission. White light endoscopy and probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) analysis were performed in the ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum. Full endoscopic remission was defined by a Mayo endoscopic score of 0 in UC and no remaining ulcer or erosion in CD. Patients were prospectively followed up and clinical relapses were recorded.

Seventy-two CD and UC patients treated by biologic therapy and in clinical and biological remission were screened. A total of 37 were also in full endoscopic remission and were included in our study; 183 intestinal segments were analyzed. We found residual pCLE anomalies in most of the patients. These anomalies were not significantly associated with any demographic or clinical characteristic including the treatment received, nor were they associated with histological parameters, levels of C-reactive protein or fecal calprotectin. Among the 37 patients, 7 (18.9%) relapsed over a median follow-up of 33.7 months. The risk of relapse was not associated with any clinical, biological, histologic, or pCLE feature at baseline.

Despite endoscopic, biological, and even histological remission, we found a high prevalence of endomicroscopic abnormalities, which were not different between anti-tumor necrosis factor- and vedolizumab-treated patients. The clinical significance of these anomalies remains to be clarified.

A treat-to-target (T2T) approach applies the principles of early intervention and tight disease control to optimise long-term outcomes in Crohn's disease. The Selecting Therapeutic Targets in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (STRIDE)-II guidelines specify short, intermediate, and long-term treatment goals, documenting specific treatment targets to be achieved at each of these timepoints. Scheduled appraisal of Crohn's disease activity against pre-defined treatment targets at these timepoints remains central to determining whether current therapy should be continued or modified. Consensus treatment targets in Crohn's disease comprise combination clinical and patient-reported outcome remission, in conjunction with biomarker normalisation and endoscopic healing. Although the STRIDE-II guidelines endorse the pursuit of endoscopic healing, clinicians must consider that this may not always be appropriate, acceptable, or achievable in all patients. This underscores the need to engage patients at the outset in an effort to personalise care and individualise treatment targets. The use of non-invasive biomarkers such as faecal calprotectin in conjunction with cross-sectional imaging techniques, particularly intestinal ultrasound, holds great promise; as do emerging treatment targets such as transmural healing. Two randomised clinical trials, namely, CALM and STARDUST, have evaluated the efficacy of a T2T approach in achieving endoscopic endpoints in patients with Crohn's disease. Findings from these studies reflect that patient subgroups and Crohn's disease characteristics likely to benefit most from a T2T approach, remain to be clarified. Moreover, outside of clinical trials, data pertaining to the real-world effectiveness of a T2T approach remains scare, highlighting the need for pragmatic real-world studies. Despite the obvious promise of a T2T approach, a lack of guidance to support its integration into real-world clinical practice has the potential to limit its uptake. This highlights the need to describe strategies, processes, and models of care capable of supporting the integration and execution of a T2T approach in real-world clinical practice. Hence, this review seeks to examine the current and emerging literature to provide clinicians with practical guidance on how to incorporate the principles of T2T into routine clinical practice for the management of Crohn's disease.

Ustekinumab (UST), a biologic agent targeting interleukin-12 and interleukin-23, is widely used in the management of psoriasis and Crohn's disease. Despite its efficacy, there have been instances of paradoxical psoriasis induction or exacerbation in some patients during UST therapy. This paper offers a comprehensive review of reported cases of UST-induced paradoxical psoriasis, including a case from our clinic. We focus on a 39-year-old female patient with a history of long-standing Crohn's disease who developed a psoriasiform rash, as confirmed by biopsy, while undergoing UST treatment. The patient's clinical journey, from initial diagnosis through the complexities of treatment adjustments due to various complications including drug-induced lupus and the subsequent onset of psoriatic manifestations, provides insight into the challenges encountered in the clinical management of such cases. This review emphasizes the necessity for clinicians to recognize the possibility of paradoxical psoriasis in patients receiving UST treatment and calls for further research to better understand this phenomenon and devise effective management strategies.

The present study was aimed at identifying a new magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) parameter assessing the clinical outcome of biological therapy in patients with active ileal/ileocolonic Crohn's disease (CD).

Transmural healing (TH) has been associated with improved outcomes in CD. However, some patients with clinical remission and inactive disease at endoscopy do not achieve TH.

Ileal/ileocolonic CD patients scheduled for biological therapy were prospectively evaluated, at baseline (T0) and after 1 year of treatment (T1), with Harvey Bradshaw Index score, blood tests, ileocolonscopy, and MRE. Clinical activity was assessed after 2 years of treatment (T2). Wall thickness ratio (WTR) was calculated in the same affected ileal segment, as the ratio between the ileum wall thickness value at T1 and the ileum wall thickness value at T0.

A total of 103 patients were included. Mean WTR at T1 in nonresponders was significantly higher than in responders. At receiver operating characteristic analysis, WTR values were significantly associated to biological therapy responsiveness. A WTR cutoff value of 0.77 mm was identified to discriminate responders from nonresponders (sensitivity: 79%; specificity: 67%). In responders, the proportion of patients with a WTR<0.77 was significantly higher than the proportion of patients achieving TH at T1. Among patients achieving endoscopic remission, 11/29 (37.9%) presented TH, while 20/29 (68.9%) presented WTR<0.77 ( P : 0.035). At multivariate logistic regression analysis, WTR<0.77 was significantly associated to biological therapy response.

WTR index represents an easy-to-calculate MRE parameter and seems to be a promising tool for monitoring therapeutic response in CD patients during biological therapy.

The STRIDE consensus suggested to focus on mucosal healing, based on biomarkers and endoscopy, in addition to clinical endpoints as treatment target. This narrative review provides a critique of this concept in Crohn´s disease.

We analyze and discuss the limitations of endpoints as targets, their currently limited achievability, and the controversial evidence relating to 'treat to target.' The relevant publications in Pubmed were identified in a literature review with the key word 'Crohn´s disease.'

All targets and endpoints have their limitations, and, even if reached, not all have unequivocally been shown to improve prognosis. The major deficiency of STRIDE is not only the lack of validation and agreement upon endpoints but little evidence of their achievability in a sizable proportion of patients by dose or timing adjustments or switching the medication. Above all, the concept should be based on clear evidence that patients indeed benefit from appropriate escalation of treatment and relevant controlled studies in this regard have been controversial. Until the STRIDE approach is proven to be superior to standard treatment focusing on clinical well-being, the field should remain reluctant and expect more convincing evidence before new targets are approved.

Endoscopy is an essential tool supporting inflammatory bowel disease diagnosis, and ileocolonoscopy is essential to the diagnostic process because it allows for histological sampling. A decent description of endoscopic lesions may lead to a correct final diagnosis up to 89% of the time. Moreover, endoscopy is key to evaluating endoscopic severity, which in both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis is associated with worse disease outcomes (e.g., more frequent advanced therapy requirements or more frequent hospitalizations and surgeries). Endoscopic severity should be reported according to validated endoscopic scores, such as the Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) or the ulcerative colitis endoscopic index of severity (UCEIS) for ulcerative colitis, the Rutgeerts score for postoperative Crohn's recurrence, and the Crohn's disease endoscopic index of severity (CDEIS) or the simplified endoscopic score for Crohn's disease (SES-CD) for luminal Crohn's disease activity. The measuring of endoscopic activity has become a regulatory agency requirement to increase the objective evaluation of disease activity and drug response. In recent years, the central reviewing of endoscopic videos has become a standard for clinical trials. However, the adjudication paradigm and the type of endoscopic reading may substantially affect trial outcomes, and the reproducibility of all endoscopic scores is not perfect as they require the interpretation of intrinsically subjective images. This paper reviews and discusses the available evidence on inflammatory bowel disease endoscopy.

Mucosal healing on endoscopy has emerged as a key prognostic parameter in the management of patients with IBD (Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis/UC) and can predict sustained clinical remission and resection-free survival. The structural basis for this type of mucosal healing is a progressive resolution of intestinal inflammation with associated healing of ulcers and improved epithelial barrier function. However, in some cases with mucosal healing on endoscopy, evidence of histological activity in mucosal biopsies has been observed. Subsequently, in UC, a second, deeper type of mucosal healing, denoted histological healing, was defined which requires the absence of active inflammation in mucosal biopsies. Both levels of mucosal healing should be considered as initial events in the resolution of gut inflammation in IBD rather than as indicators of complete transmural healing. In this review, the effects of anti-inflammatory, biological or immunosuppressive agents as well as small molecules on mucosal healing in clinical studies are highlighted. In addition, we focus on the implications of mucosal healing for clinical management of patients with IBD. Moreover, emerging techniques for the analysis of mucosal healing as well as potentially deeper levels of mucosal healing such as transmural healing and functional barrier healing of the mucosa are discussed. Although none of these new levels of healing indicate a definitive cure of the diseases, they make an important contribution to the assessment of patients' prognosis. The ultimate level of healing in IBD would be a resolution of all aspects of intestinal and extraintestinal inflammation (complete healing).

Small bowel (SB) endoscopic healing has not been well explored in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). This study aimed to assess the clinical utility of SB endoscopic mucosal and histological healing in patients with CD.

In total, 99 patients with CD in clinical-serological remission were retrospectively followed after they underwent colonoscopy and double-balloon enteroscopy. Time until clinical relapse (CD activity index of >150 with an increase of >70 points) and serological relapse (abnormal elevation of C-reactive protein levels) constituted the primary endpoints.

Of the 99 patients, 75 (74.7%) exhibited colonoscopic healing and 43 (43.4%) exhibited SB endoscopic healing. Clinical relapse, serological relapse, hospitalization, and surgery occurred in 8 (18.6%), 11 (25.6%), 11 (25.6%), and 2 (4.6%) patients, respectively. Of the 43 patients who exhibited SB endoscopic healing, 21 (48.8%) achieved histological healing. Clinical relapse, serological relapse, hospitalization, and surgery occurred in 4 (19.0%), 7 (33.3%), 7 (33.3%), and 1 (4.8%) patient, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the number of patients who relapsed, were hospitalized, or underwent surgery between those who exhibited histological healing and those who did not.

A substantial number of patients who were in clinical-serological remission did not undergo SB endoscopic healing, and the lesions increased their risk of clinical relapse. Thus, endoscopic healing may be of greater clinical value than histological healing when evaluating the remission of patients with CD.

There is notable disparity between symptomatology and disease activity in a significant proportion of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and escalation of treatment based on symptoms alone can fail to significantly alter the course of disease. The STRIDE-II position statement, published in 2021 by the Selecting Therapeutic Targets in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (STRIDE) initiative of the International Organisation for the Study of IBD (IOIBD) provides the most current recommendations for a treat-to-target (T2T) approach in IBD. Despite the benefits offered by a T2T approach in IBD, there are numerous drawbacks and current limitations to its widespread implementation in real-world clinical practice. Owing to the lack of a standardised definition of MH, outcome data are heterogeneous and limit the comparability of existing data. Further, studies investigating the likelihood of achieving MH with a T2T approach are limited and largely retrospective. Evidence of the real-world feasibility of tight monitoring is currently minimal and demonstrates sub-optimal adherence among patients. Further, the few studies on the acceptability and uptake of a T2T approach in real-world practice demonstrate the need for increased acceptability on both patients' and clinicians' behalf. Real-world applicability is further limited by the need for repeated endoscopic assessments of MH as well as a lack of guidance on how to incorporate the various treatment targets into therapeutic decision-making. We aim to review the benefits and challenges of the T2T approach and to discuss potential solutions to further patient care.

The therapeutic landscape for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has changed considerably over the past two decades, owing to the development and widespread penetration of targeted therapies, including biologics and small molecules. While some conventional treatments continue to have an important role in the management of IBD, treatment of IBD is increasingly moving towards targeted therapies given their greater efficacy and safety in comparison to conventional agents. Early introduction of these therapies-particularly in persons with Crohn's disease-combining targeted therapies with traditional anti-metabolite immunomodulators and targeting objective markers of disease activity (in addition to symptoms), have been shown to improve health outcomes and will be increasingly adopted over time. The substantially increased costs associated with targeted therapies has led to a ballooning of healthcare expenditure to treat IBD over the past 15 years. The introduction of less expensive biosimilar anti-tumour necrosis factor therapies may bend this cost curve downwards, potentially allowing for more widespread access to these medications. Newer therapies targeting different inflammatory pathways and complementary and alternative therapies (including novel diets) will continue to shape the IBD treatment landscape. More precise use of a growing number of targeted therapies in the right individuals at the right time will help minimize the development of expensive and disabling complications, which has the potential to further reduce costs and improve outcomes.

With the introduction of novel therapies for inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), 'treat-to-target' strategies are increasingly discussed to improve short- and long-term outcomes in patients with IBD.

To discuss opportunities and challenges of a treat-to-target approach in light of the current 'Selecting Therapeutic Targets in Inflammatory Bowel Disease' (STRIDE-II) consensus METHODS: The 2021 update of STRIDE-II encompasses 13 evidence- and consensus-based recommendations for treat-to-target strategies in adults and children with IBD. We highlight the potential implications and limitations of these recommendations for clinical practice.

STRIDE-II provides valuable guidance for personalised IBD management. It reflects scientific progress as well as increased evidence of improved outcomes when more ambitious treatment goals such as mucosal healing are achieved.

Prospective studies, objective criteria for risk stratification, and better predictors of therapeutic response are needed to potentially render 'treating to target' more effective in the future.