Prospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Hepatol. Jul 18, 2017; 9(20): 896-904
Published online Jul 18, 2017. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v9.i20.896
Table 1 Comparison between patients who developed post-living-donor liver transplantation single episode and those who developed repeated episodes of infection regarding pre-operative parameters n (%)
Single episode of infection (n = 21)Repeated episodes of infection (n = 12)P value
Recipient's age (yr, mean ± SD)51.2 ± 8.352.08 ± 8.70.767
Donor's age (yr, mean ± SD)26.9 ± 6.332.3 ± 6.10.021
Recipient's gender (male/female)19/212/00.523
Donor’s gender (male/female)19/210/20.610
Hepatocellular carcinoma6 (28.6)8 (66.7)0.033
History of bridging procedures14 (19.0)6 (50.0)0.114
History of SBP10 (47.6)1 (8.3)0.052
History of paracentesis11 (52.4)4 (33.3)0.290
Diabetes mellitus8 (38.1)5 (41.7)1.000
Child-Pugh class (B/C)10/115/70.741
MELD score (median, interquartile range)14 (12-16)16 (15-18)0.136
Thrombocytopenia220 (95.2)12 (100.0)1.000
Leucopenia39 (42.9)5 (41.7)0.947
Renal impairment2 (9.5)1 (8.3)1.000
High serum ferritin413 (61.9)5 (41.7)0.261
High C-reactive protein514 (66.7)11 (91.7)0.206
Table 2 Comparison between patients who developed single episode and those who developed repeated episodes of infection regarding operative details
Single episode of infection (n = 21)Repeated episodes of infection (n = 12)P value
CIT (min), mean ± SD43.6 ± 17.350.8 ± 17.70.259
WIT (min), mean ± SD45.7 ± 13.450.8 ± 12.40.288
Recipient's operative time (h), mean ± SD10.3 ± 1.110.5 ± 1.50.704
Packed red cell transfusion (U), (median, interquartile range)2 (2-4)3 (2-6)0.493
Table 3 Length of intensive care unit stay, length of exposure to invasive procedures, and time to occurrence of infection in patients who suffered from single vs repeated episodes of infection
Single episode of infection (n = 21)Repeated episodes of infection (n = 12)P value
Length of ICU stay (d)6 (5-7)7 (5-7)0.969
Days on mechanical ventilator1 (1-1)1 (1-1)0.176
Days with CVC6 (5-7)6 (5-7)0.770
Days with urinary catheter6 (5-7)7 (6-8)0.467
Days with drains17 (15-20)25 (21-30)0.002
Time-to-infection (d)14 (12-17)9 (6-19)0.189
Table 4 Site of infection and implicated organisms in patients who suffered from single vs repeated episodes of infection n (%)
Single episode (n = 21)Repeated episodes (n = 36)1P value
Site of organism isolation0.896
Bile6 (28.6)10 (27.8)
Wound1 (4.8)2 (5.6)
Sputum3 (14.3)7 (19.4)
Drains5 (23.8)7 (19.4)
Blood3 (14.3)8 (22.2)
Urine2 (9.5)2 (5.6)
Ascitic fluid1 (4.8)0 (0.0)
Oragnism isolated0.456
Goagulase (-) Staph. aureus3 (14.3)1 (2.8)
Staph. aureus0 (0.0)1 (2.8)
MRSA3 (14.3)1 (2.8)
E. coli2 (9.5)4 (11.1)
Klebsiella species2 (9.5)3 (8.3)
Pseudomonas aeruginosa4 (19.0)3 (8.3)
Acinetobacter baumannii4 (19.0)12 (33.3)
Proteus0 (0.0)2 (5.6)
Enterobacteriaceae1 (4.8)1 (2.8)
Enterococci1 (4.8)2 (5.6)
Bacillus species0 (0.0)2 (5.6)
Pseudomonas + Acinetobacter1 (4.8)0 (0.0)
Pseudomonas + Klebsiella0 (0.0)2 (5.6)
Acinetobacter + Klebsiella0 (0.0)1 (2.8)
Acinetobacter + coagulase (-) Staph. aureus0 (0.0)1 (2.8)
Table 5 Antimicrobial sensitivity in patients who suffered from single vs repeated episodes of infection n (%)
AntimicrobialAll episodes of infection (n = 57)Single episode of infection (n = 21)Repeated pisodes of infection (n = 36)P value
LevofloxacinS11 (52.4)2 (22.2)9 (75.0)0.030
R10 (47.6)7 (77.8)3 (25.0)
CiprofloxacinS5 (38.5)0 (0.0)5 (45.5)0.487
R8 (61.5)2 (100.0)6 (54.5)
Co-trimoxazoleS1 (7.1)0 (0.0)1 (10.0)1.000
R13 (92.9)4 (100.0)9 (90.0)
PenicillinS1 (11.1)1 (14.3)0 (0.0)1.000
R8 (88.9)6 (85.7)2 (100.0)
DoxycyclineS14 (77.8)5 (100.0)9 (69.2)0.278
R4 (22.2)0 (0.0)4 (30.8)
VancomycinS8 (88.9)4 (100.0)4 (80.0)1.000
R1 (11.1)0 (0.0)1 (20.0)
Piperacillin-tazobactamS8 (72.7)3 (75.0)5 (71.4)1.000
R3 (27.3)1 (25.0)2 (28.6)
AminoglycosidesS9 (75.0)1 (50.0)8 (80.0)0.455
R3 (25.0)1 (50.0)2 (20.0)
ImipenemS20 (69.0)8 (88.9)12 (60.0)0.201
R9 (31.0)1 (11.1)8 (40.0)
CeftrioxoneS7 (38.9)1 (16.7)6 (50.0)0.316
R11 (61.1)5 (83.3)6 (50.0)
CefotaximeR8 (100.0)7 (100.0)1 (100.0)-
AztreonamR6 (100.0)1 (100.0)5 (100.0)-
Table 6 Multivariate binary logistic regression model for prediction of the occurrence of repeated episodes of infection
Regression coefficientSEOdds ratio95%CIP value
Donor’s age (yr)0.050.081.050.90-1.230.552
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC = 1, no HCC = 0)3.241.4325.441.53-422.210.024
Duration of drain insertion (d)0.320.141.381.04-1.830.024
Constant-10.28
Model diagnostics
-2 Log Likelihood testP value, < 0.001
Hosmer and Lemeshow testP value, 0.369
Correct classification rate87.88%
ROC curve analysis
AUC0.935 (95%CI: 0.791-0.991; P value < 0.0001)
Sensitivity, %91.7 (95%CI: 61.5-99.8)
Specificity, %81.0 (95%CI: 58.1-94.6)
PPV, %73.3 (95%CI: 43.8-92.7)
NPV, %94.4 (95%CI: 72.7-99.9)
Table 7 Results of the Kaplan-Meier analysis for time to infection in patients who suffered from single and repeated infection episodes
Single infection episode (n = 21)Repeated infection episodes (n = 12)
Median time to infection (d)14 (95%CI: 13-16)8.5 (95%CI: 6-17)
Hazard ratio1.16 (95%CI: 56-2.40)
Log-rank testP value = 0.647