Hsu MC, Weber CN, Stavropoulos SW, Clark TW, Trerotola SO, Shlansky-Goldberg RD, Soulen MC, Nadolski GJ. Passive expansion of sub-maximally dilated transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts and assessment of clinical outcomes. World J Hepatol 2017; 9(12): 603-612 [PMID: 28515846 DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v9.i12.603]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Michael C Hsu, MD, Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, Mount Sinai Hospital, 215 East 95th St. Apt. 5L, New York, NY 10128, United States. hsu.mike.c@gmail.com
Research Domain of This Article
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Hepatol. Apr 28, 2017; 9(12): 603-612 Published online Apr 28, 2017. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v9.i12.603
Table 1 Demographics and clinical characteristics
Sub-maximally dilated
Maximally dilated
P value
Total patients
43
230
NA
Male
23
150
0.17
Female
20
80
Mean age (yr)
56.5 ± 2.3 (range 10-83)
54.5 ± 0.7 (range 20-81)
0.29
Mean MELD
13.6 ± 0.6 (range 6-25)
13.5 ± 0.3 (range 6-28)
0.82
Mean pre-TIPS PSG (mmHg)
19.4 ± 6.8 (range 8-45)
22.4 ± 7.1 (range 9-73)
0.01
Median post-TIPS PSG (mmHg)
8 (range 1-13)
8 (range 2-20)
0.13
Mean percent change in PSG (%)
59.1 ± 15.9 (range 0-95)
61.0 ± 12.4 (range 0-89)
0.53
Table 2 Mean pre-transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt portosystemic gradient and percent change in portosystemic gradient in patients with post-transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt portosystemic gradient above and below 12 mmHg
> 12 mmHg
≤ 12 mmHg
P value
Mean pre-TIPS PSG (mmHg)
33 ± 13.2 (range 20-73)
21.1 ± 5.7 (range 8-53)
< 0.01
Mean percent change in PSG (%)
48.3 ± 13.1 (range 30.8-82.2)
61.6 ± 12.6 (range 0-95)
< 0.01
Table 3 Measurements of 8 mm transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt stents on computed tomography imaging follow-up
Median diameter (mm)
Median percent diameter change
Median area (mm2)
Median percent area change
< 6 mo (n = 7)
8.05 (range 7.84-8.43)
0.67%
50.94
1.34%
> 6 mo (n = 7)
8.45 (range 8.23-8.72)
5.58%
56.04
11.48%
P-value
0.01
0.01%
0.01
0.01%
Table 4 Clinical Success of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt n (%)
Sub-maximally dilated
Maximally dilated
P value
Complete Clinical Success of TIPS for Ascites
Yes
9 (64)
63 (64)
1
No
5 (36)
35 (36)
Partial Clinical Success of TIPS for Ascites
Yes
11 (79)
89 (91)
0.17
No
3 (21)
9 (9)
Clinical Success of TIPS for Varices
Yes
7 (78)
64 (85)
0.62
No
2 (22)
11 (15)
Table 5 Severe post- transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt hepatic encephalopathy n (%)
Severe post-TIPS HE
Sub-maximally dilated
Maximally dilated
P value
Yes
4 (7)
6 (3)
0.12
No
51 (93)
212 (97)
Table 6 Model for End-Stage Liver Disease and post-transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt portosystemic gradient for patients with and without severe post-transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt hepatic encephalopathy
Mean MELD with HE
Mean MELD without HE
P value
Median post-TIPS PSG with HE (mmHg)
Median post-TIPS PSG without HE (mmHg)
P value
Sub-maximally dilated
13.3 ± 2.9 (range 11-17)
13.7 ± 4.3 (range 6-25)
0.85
7.5 (range 6-8)
8 (range 1-13)
0.67
Maximally dilated
15.8 ± 4.3 (range 12-24)
13.4 ± 4.1 (range 6-28)
0.16
10 (range 4-11)
8 (range 2-20)
0.36
Citation: Hsu MC, Weber CN, Stavropoulos SW, Clark TW, Trerotola SO, Shlansky-Goldberg RD, Soulen MC, Nadolski GJ. Passive expansion of sub-maximally dilated transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts and assessment of clinical outcomes. World J Hepatol 2017; 9(12): 603-612