Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Hepatol. May 18, 2016; 8(14): 607-615
Published online May 18, 2016. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v8.i14.607
Published online May 18, 2016. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v8.i14.607
Table 1 Studies related to complications of liver resection and transhepatic arterial chemotherapy and embolization for intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma
Ref. | Patient | Median OS | Survival rate | DFS | Hospital mortality | Complications |
Wang et al[24] | LR: 243 | LR: 60.4 | 1-, 3- and 5-yr | NR | NR | NR |
TACE: 741 | TACE: 18.2 | LR: 81.5%, 64.4%, 50.5% | ||||
Sig | TACE: 61.9%, 29.1%, 16.4% | |||||
Sig | ||||||
Ho et al[25] | LR: 122 | LR: 41.8 | 1-, 3- and 5-yr | 1-, 3- and 5-yr | NR | NR |
TACE: 163 | TACE: 16.8 | LR: 77.4%, 51.9%, 36.6% | LR: 60.5%, 32.3%, 24.8% | |||
Sig | TACE: 62.6%, 25.2%, 11% | |||||
Sig | ||||||
Lin et al[26] | LR: 93 | LR: 27.6 | 1-, 2- and 3-yr | NR | LR: 3/78 (3.8%) | NR |
TACE: 73 | TACE: 18.5 | LR: 83%, 62%, 49% | TACE: 5/93 (5.4%) | |||
TACE: 39%, 5%, 2% | No sig | |||||
Sig | ||||||
Hsu et al[27] | LR: 268 | NR | 1-, 3- and 5-yr | NR | 90 d | LR vs TACE: |
TACE: 455 | LR: 81%, 68%, 63% | LR: 4/146 (2.7%) | Acute liver failure (20% vs 11%) | |||
TACE: 30%, 43%, 15% | TACE: 12/146 (8.2%) | Sig | ||||
Sig | Sig | Biliary tract injury (6.8% vs 0%) | ||||
Sig | ||||||
Zhong et al[28] | LR: 660 | NR | 1-, 3- and 5-yr | NR | NR | NR |
TACE: 319 | LR: 91%, 67%, 44% | |||||
TACE: 83%, 35%, 17% | ||||||
Sig | ||||||
Zhong et al[29] | LR: 257 | LR: 42.9 | 1-, 3- and 5-yr | NR | LR vs TACE: 3.1% vs 3.7% | LR vs TACE: 28% vs 18.5% |
TACE: 135 | TACE: 21 | LR: 84%, 59%, 37% | No sig | Sig | ||
Sig | TACE: 69%, 29%, 14% | |||||
Sig | ||||||
After propensity score analysis | ||||||
LR: 87%, 62%, 35% | ||||||
TACE: 77%, 44%, 20% | ||||||
Sig | ||||||
Yin et al[31] | LR: 88 | LR: 41 | 1-, 2- and 3-yr | NR | LR: 1/88 (1.1%) | NR |
TACE: 85 | TACE: 14 | LR: 76.1%, 63.5%, 51.5% | ||||
Sig | TACE: 51.8%, 34.8%, 18.1% | |||||
Sig |
Table 2 Studies comparing liver resection for Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer A and B
Ref. | Group | Median OS (mo) | Median DFS (mo) | Accumulative DFS | Intrahepatic recurrence | Extra-hepatic recurrence | Survival rate | Mortality | Morbidity |
Ng et al[38] | BCLC A: 404 | A: 83.5 (67.9-99.1) | A: 77 (66, 87.9) | A: 80%, 64%, 40% | A: 139/404 (34.4%) | A: 95/404 (23.5%) | 1-, 3- and 5- yr | A: 11/404 (2.7%) | 93/404 (23.0%) |
BCLC B: 380 | B: 36.9 (28.9-44.8) | B: 15.6 (10.8-20.4) | B: 54%, 38%, 26% | B: 199/380 (52.4%) | B: 110/380 (29.0%) | A: 88%, 76%, 58% | B: 9/380 (2.4%) | 104/380 (27.4%) | |
Sig | Sig | Sig | Sig | No sig | B: 74%, 50%, 39% | No sig | No sig | ||
Sig | |||||||||
Cho et al[39] | BCLC A: 169 | NR | NR | 1-, 3- and 5- yr | NR | NR | 1-, 3- and 5- yr | A: 1/169 (0.6%) | NR |
BCLC B: 61 | A: 71.4%, 51.8%, 44.1% | A: 87.5%, 69.5%, 59.0% | B: 1/61 (1.6%) | ||||||
B: 58.3%, 40.0%, 31.7% | B: 85.0%, 59.3%, 52.9% | No sig | |||||||
No sig | No sig | ||||||||
Torzilli et al[44] | BCLC A: 61 | NR | NR | A: 77%, 30% | A: 19/61 (31.14%) | A: 2/61 (3.3%) | 1- and 3-yr | A: 0 | A: 13/61 (21.3%) |
BCLC B: 24 | B: 75%, 35% | B: 6/24 (25%) | B: 3/24 (12.5%) | A: 91.6%, 81% | B: 0 | B: 7/24 (29.2%) | |||
No sig | No sig | No sig | B: 85%, 67% | No sig | No sig | ||||
No sig | |||||||||
Wang et al[24] | BCLC A: 202 | A: Can’t estimate | A: NR | A: NR | A: NR | A: NR | A: Cannot be estimated | NR | NR |
BCLC B: 243 | B: 60.4 | B: NR | B: NR | B: NR | B: NR | B: 1-, 3- and 5- yr | |||
(81.5%, 64.4%, 50.5%) | |||||||||
Wei et al[40] | BCLC A: 52 | NR | NR | 1-, 2- and 3-yr | NR | NR | 1-, 2- and 3-yr | NR | NR |
BCLC: 51 | A: 77.8%, 61.4%, 48.9% | A: 86.5%, 75.0%, 69.2% | |||||||
B: 70.2%, 55.8%, 45.4%; | B: 84.3%, 68.6%, 54.9% | ||||||||
No sig | No sig | ||||||||
Chang et al[43] | BCLC A: NR | NR | NR | 5 yr | The 1-, 2-, 3- and 5-yr recurrence rates were 44.2%, 54.5%, 60.6%, and 68.1%, respectively, in BCLC stage B patients | 1-, 2-, 3- and 5-yr | NR | NR | |
BCLC B: 318 | B: 28.6% | B: 81.2%, 68.1%, 59.4%, 46.5% | |||||||
Ma et al[49] | BCLC A: 92 | A: Cannot be estimated | A: Cannot be estimated | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR |
BCLC B: 178 | B: 27.9 ± 3.1 (21.8-33.9) | B: 16.8 ± 1.65 (13.6-20.0) | |||||||
Torzilli et al[41] | BCLC A: 777 | NR | NR | 1-, 3- and 5-yr | NR | NR | 1-, 3- and 5-yr | 30 d | Not significant in major complications |
BCLC B: 633 | A: 77%, 41%, 21% | A: 9 5%, 80%, 61% | A: 1.6% vs B: 3.1% | ||||||
B: 63%, 38%, 27% | B: 88%, 71%, 57% | No sig | |||||||
Sig | Sig | ||||||||
Cucchetti et al[35] | BCLC A: NR | B: 35 (26-42) | NR | NR | NR | NR | 1-, 3- and 5-yr | NR | NR |
BCLC B: 247 | B: 77.8%, 48.7% 33.8% | ||||||||
Yamashita [42] | BCLC A: Cannot be estimated | NR | NR | 5-yr | Recurrence rate | 5 yr | B: 2/53 (3.8%) | B: 13/53 (24.5%) | |
BCLC B: 53 | B: 24% | B: 32/53 (62%) | B: 35% |
Table 3 Prognostic risk factors of overall survival and disease-free survival
Ref. | Prognostic factors of overall survival | Prognostic factors of disease-free survival | ||
By univariate analysis | By multivariate analysis | By univariate analysis | By multivariate analysis | |
Ng et al[38] | Hepatitis B surface antigen carrier, serum AFP, symptomatic disease, presence of cirrhosis, number of tumor nodule, microvascular tumor invasion, tumor invasion of adjacent organs, histological margin involvement by tumor | Symptomatic disease, presence of cirrhosis, multi-nodular tumor, microvascular tumor invasion, positive histological margin | Serum AFP level, symptomatic disease, presence of cirrhosis, multi-nodular tumor, microvascular tumor invasion, tumor invasion of adjacent organ, positive histological margins, the presence of microsatellite nodules | Symptomatic disease, presence of cirrhosis, multi-nodular tumor, positive histological margins |
Torzilli et al[44] | Tumor size, tumor grade | Tumor size, tumor grade | NR | NR |
Chang et al[43] | NR | Serum albumin level, ICG-15R, serum creatinine, multi-nodularity, Edmondson stage, macro-vascular invasion | NR | NR |
Ma et al[49] | Histopathological grade, tumor capsule, tumor number, cirrhosis, BCLC classification | Tumor capsule, BCLC classification | NR | Tumor capsule, BCLC classification |
Torzilli et al[41] | Tumor number, tumor size, macro-vascular invasion, presence of cirrhosis, esophageal varices, major resection, BCLC classification, preoperative bilirubin values | NR | NR | NR |
Cucchetti et al[35] | NR | Tumor number, presence of esophageal varices, Child-Pugh score | NR | NR |
Cho et al[39] | Child-Pugh class B, AFP level > 400 ng/mL, histologically poor differentiation | Child-Pugh class B | Positivity of hepatitis B surface antigen, Child-Pugh class B, AFP level > 400 ng/mL, microvascular invasion, histologically poor differentiation | Child-Pugh class B, microvascular invasion |
Yamashita et al[42] | NR | T4 status of HCC stage by liver cancer study group of Japan, thrombus in portal vein | NR | T4 status of HCC stage by liver cancer study group of Japan, intra-operative transfusion |
Lin et al[26] | NR | Low albumin level, treatment modality (liver resection vs TACE) | NR | NR |
Hsu et al[27] | NR | Serum AFP level, Child-Pugh class B, performance status ≥ 2, TACE, tumor size, vascular invasion | NR | NR |
Zhong et al[28] | NR | Serum AFP ≥ 400 ng/mL, diabetes mellitus, macro-vascular invasion, portal hypertension, TACE treatment | NR | NR |
Yin et al[31] | Treatment modality, serum AFP level, total tumor size, tumor number, gender | Tumor number, treatment modality, gender | NR | NR |
- Citation: Yi PS, Zhang M, Zhao JT, Xu MQ. Liver resection for intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Hepatol 2016; 8(14): 607-615
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v8/i14/607.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v8.i14.607