Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Hepatol. Mar 27, 2015; 7(3): 488-497
Published online Mar 27, 2015. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i3.488
Published online Mar 27, 2015. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i3.488
Ref. | Year | Location | Type of provider | HBeAg status | Viral load | HBV status known to provider | HBV status known to institution | No. of patients infected | Breach in infection control identified |
[7] | 1969 | United States | Nurse | Not done | Not done | No | No | 11a (11 possible) | None |
[8] | 1969-1974 | United States | Oral surgeon | Positive | Not done | Not specified | Not specified | 55 (10 probable, 45 possible) | HCW did not wear gloves |
[9] | 1973-1977 | Switzerland | General practitioner | Positive | Not done | Yes | Not specified | 41 (41 possible) | None |
[10] | 1974 | United States | Respiratory therapist | Positive | Not done | No | No | 4 (4 probable) | HCW did not wear gloves, had an exudative dermatitis on hands, and reused syringes when accessing indwelling arterial catheters |
[11] | 1975 | United States | Oral surgeon | Not done | Not done | Not specified | Not specified | 43 (43 probable) | None |
[12] | 1976-1979 | United Kingdom | Surgical registrar | Positive | Not done | No | No | 9 (7 probable, 2 possible) | None |
[13] | 1977-1978 | United Kingdom | Surgical registrar, gynecologic surgery | Positive | Not done | No | No | 8 (6 probable, 2 possible) | None |
[14] | 1978 | United States | Dentist | Positive | Not done | Yes | Not specified | 6 (2 probable, 4 possible) | HCW did not wear gloves |
[15] | 1978 | Norway | Cardiac surgeon | Positive | Not done | No | No | 5 (5 probable) | None |
[16] | 1978-1979 | United States | Oral surgeon | Positive | Not done | No | No | 12 (4 probable, 8 possible) | HCW did not wear gloves and had a generalized eczematous dermatitis, including hand involvement |
[17] | 1979-1980 | United States | Obstetrician-gynecologist | Positive | Not done | Yes | Yes | 4 (1 probable, 3 possible) | HCW held needle in hand rather than a needle holder when suturing, noted several episodes of blood on hands after removing gloves |
[18] | 1979-1981 | The Netherlands | Cardiac surgeon | Not reported | Not done | Not specified | Not specified | 3 (3 probable) | None |
[18] | 1979-1981 | The Netherlands | Perfusion technician | Positive | Not done | Not specified | Not specified | 11 (8 probable, 3 possible) | Bleeding warts on HCW’s hands |
[19] | 1980 | United States | Oral surgeon | Not done | Not done | Not specified | Not specified | 3 (3 probable) | None |
[20] | 1980-1983 | United Kingdom | Perfusion technician | Positive | Not done | Yes | Not specified | 6 (6 probable) | HCW did not wear gloves, and had cuts and abrasions on hands |
[20] | 1980-1983 | United Kingdom | Surgical registrar | Not reported | Not done | Not specified | Not specified | 5 (5 possible) | None |
[20] | 1980-1983 | United Kingdom | House officer | Not reported | Not done | Not specified | Not specified | 1 (1 possible) | None |
[21] | 1984 | United States | Obstetrician-gynecologist | Positive | Not done | Not specified | Not specified | 6 (6 probable) | None |
[22] | 1984-1985 | United States | Dentist | Positive | Not done | No | No | 24 (6 probable, 18 possible) | HCW did not wear gloves |
[23] | 1987 | United States | General surgeon | Positive | Not done | Yes | Not specified | 5 (3 probable, 2 possible) | None |
[24] | 1987 | United Kingdom | Obstetrician-gynecologist | Positive | Not done | No | No | 22 (6 probable, 16 possible) | None |
[25] | 1988 | United Kingdom | General surgeon | Negative | 1 × 107 copies/mL | No | No | 1 (1 confirmed) | None |
[25] | 1988 | United Kingdom | Obstetrician-gynecologist, trainee | Negative | 4.4 × 106 copies/mL | No | No | 3 (3 confirmed) | None |
[25] | 1988 | United Kingdom | Obstetrician-gynecologist, trainee | Negative | 5.5 × 106 copies/mL | Yes | Not specified | 1 (1 confirmed) | None |
[25] | 1988 | United Kingdom | General surgeon, urologist, clinical assistant | Negative | 2.5 × 105 copies/mL | No | No | 1 (1 confirmed) | None |
[26] | 1988 | United Kingdom | Cardiothoracic surgeon, trainee | Positive | Not done | No | No | 17 (9 probable, 8 possible) | None |
[27] | 1991 | United Kingdom | Surgeon | Positive | Not done | No | No | 3 (3 possible) | None |
[28] | 1991 | Canada | Orthopedic surgeon | Positive | Not done | Yes | Yes | 2 (1 probable, 1 possible) | None |
[29] | 1991-1992 | United States | Thoracic surgeon | Positive | 1 × 109 copies/mL | Yes | Not specified | 19 (9 confirmed, 4 probable, 6 possible) | None |
[30] | 1991-1993 | United Kingdom | Cardiothoracic surgeon | Positive | Not done | Yes | No | 20 (14 confirmed, 6 probable) | None |
[31] | 1991-1996 | Canada | Electroencephalogram technician | Positive | Not done | No | No | 75 (4 confirmed, 71 possible) | HCW did not wear gloves and used reusable subdermal EEG electrodes |
[32] | 1993 | United Kingdom | General surgeon | Positive | Not done | No | No | 2 (2 confirmed) | None |
[33] | 1993-1994 | United Kingdom | General surgeon, trainee | Positive | Not done | Not specified | Not specified | 11 (1 confirmed, 10 possible) | None |
[33] | 1994 | United Kingdom | General surgeon, trainee | Positive | Not done | Not specified | Not specified | 2 (2 possible) | None |
[33] | 1994 | United Kingdom | Urologist, trainee | Positive | Not done | Not specified | Not specified | 1 (1 possible) | None |
[34] | 1995-1999 | The Netherlands | General surgeon | Positive | 5 × 109 GE/mL | No | No | 28 (8 confirmed, 20 possible) | HCW noted glove perforations |
[35] | 1996 | United Kingdom | Orthopedic surgeon | Negative but anti-HB e positive (pre-core mutant) | Not done | Yes | Yes | 1 (1 confirmed) | None |
[36] | 1999 | United Kingdom | Cardiothoracic surgeon | Negative but anti-HB e positive (pre-core mutant) | 1.03 × 106 GE/mL | Yes | Yes | 2 (2 confirmed) | None |
[37] | 2001 | United Kingdom | General surgeon | Negative | > 106 copies/mL | No | No | 3 (3 confirmed) | None |
[38] | 2009 | United States | Orthopedic surgeon | Positive | > 17.9 million IU/mL | No | No | 8 (2 confirmed, 6 possible) | None |
[39] | 2010 | Japan | Obstetrician-gynecologist | Positive | 1.6 × 109 copies/mL | No | No | 1 (1 confirmed) | None |
CDC | SHEA | ACS | Canada | UK | Europe | Australia | |
Screening | All HCWs at risk for HBV infection should be tested | Not addressed in guideline | All surgeons should know their HBV status | Mandatory for all HCWs who perform EPPs | Mandatory for all HCWs who perform EPPs, can be done post-vaccination | Mandatory for all HCWs who perform EPPs, can be done post-vaccination | Annual testing recommended for all HCWs who perform EPPs |
Vaccination | All HCWs susceptible to HBV infection should be vaccinated | Not addressed in guideline | All surgeons who are antibody negative should be vaccinated | Mandatory for all HCWs who perform EPPs | Mandatory for all HCWs who perform EPPs | Recommended for all HCWs | Recommended for all HCWs |
Post- vaccination serology | Recommended | Not addressed in guideline | Recommended | Recommended | Recommended | Recommended | Not addressed in guideline |
Frequency of testing/ monitoring | Every 6 mo | Every 6 mo | Not specified | Every 12 mo | Every 12 mo, or every 3 mo while on antiviral therapy | Every 12 mo if HBeAg negative, every 3 mo if HBeAg positive or on antiviral therapy | Every 3 mo if on antiviral therapy, every 12 mo if cleared HBsAg |
Viral load limit | 1000 IU/mL or 5000 GE/mL | 104 GE/mL | Not specified | Not specified | 103 GE/mL | 104 GE/mL | Undetectable by PCR assay |
HBeAg | Not required to be negative | Not required to be negative | Not required to be negative | Not required to be negative | Must be negative | Not required to be negative | Not addressed in guideline |
Restriction of practice | EPPs restricted if viral load greater than set threshold | Category III procedures restricted if viral burden greater than or equal to 104 GE/mL or HBeAg positive | Determined by expert panel | Determined by expert panel | If HBeAg positive or if viral load greater than 103 GE/mL | If viral load greater than 104 GE/mL | If HBV DNA level detectable |
Definition of EPPs | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Expert panel recommended | Yes | Yes | Yes, if HBeAg positive or high viral load | Yes, if HBsAg positive | No, recommend monitoring by an occupational health physician | No | Yes |
Pre-emptive patient notification | No | No | Not specified | No | No | Optional for HCWs with HBV DNA levels above the cut-off level in order to continue practicing EPPs | No |
CDC |
Category I. Procedures known or likely to pose an increased risk of percutaneous injury to a healthcare provider that have resulted in provider- to-patient transmission of HBV. These procedures are limited to major abdominal, cardiothoracic, and orthopedic surgery, repair of major traumatic injuries, abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy, caesarean section, vaginal deliveries, and major oral or maxillofacial surgery. Techniques that have been demonstrated to increase the risk for healthcare provider percutaneous injury and provider-to-patient blood exposure include: digital palpation of a needle tip in a body cavity and/or the simultaneous presence of a health care provider’s fingers and a needle or other sharp instrument or object in a poorly visualized or highly confined anatomic site |
Category II. These procedures pose low or no risk for percutaneous injury to a HCW or, if a percutaneous injury occurs, it usually happens outside of a patient’s body and generally does not pose a risk for provider-to-patient blood exposure. These include: surgical and obstetrical/gynecologic procedures that do not involve the techniques listed for Category I, the use of needles or other sharp devices when the HCW’s hands are outside a body cavity, dental procedures other than major oral or maxillofacial surgery, insertion of tubes, endoscopic or bronchoscopic procedures, internal examination with a gloved hand that does not involve the use of sharp devices, and procedures that involve external physical touch |
SHEA |
Category I. Procedures with de minimis risk of bloodborne virus transmission: regular history-taking and/or physical or dental examinations; routine dental preventive procedures, diagnostic procedures, orthodontic procedures, prosthetic procedures, cosmetic procedures not requiring local anesthesia; routine rectal or vaginal examination; minor surface suturing; elective peripheral phlebotomy; lower gastrointestinal tract endoscopic examinations and procedures; hands-off supervision during surgical procedures and computer-aided remote or robotic surgical procedures; and psychiatric evaluations |
Category II. Procedures for which bloodborne virus transmission is theoretically possible but unlikely: locally anesthetized ophthalmologic surgery; locally anesthetized operative, prosthetic, and endodontic dental procedures; periodontal scaling and root planing; minor oral surgical procedures; minor local procedures under local anesthesia; percutaneous cardiac procedures; percutaneous and other minor orthopedic procedures; subcutaneous pacemaker implantation; bronchoscopy; insertion and maintenance of epidural and spinal anesthesia lines; minor gynecological procedures; male urological procedures; upper gastrointestinal tract endoscopic procedures; minor vascular procedures; amputations; breast augmentation or reduction; minimum-exposure plastic surgical procedures; total and subtotal thyroidectomy and/or biopsy; endoscopic ear, nose, and throat surgery and simple ear and nasal procedures; ophthalmic surgery; assistance with an uncomplicated vaginal delivery; laparoscopic procedures; thorascopic procedures; nasal endoscopic procedures; routine arthroscopic procedures; plastic surgery; insertion of, maintenance of, and drug administration into arterial and central venous lines; endotracheal intubation and use of laryngeal mask; and obtainment and use of venous and arterial access devices that occur under complete antiseptic technique, using universal precautions, “no-sharp” technique, and newly gloved hands |
Category III. Procedures for which there is definite risk of bloodborne virus transmission or that have been classified previously as “exposure-prone:” general surgery; general oral surgery; cardiothoracic surgery; open extensive head and neck surgery involving bones; neurosurgery, other intracranial procedures, and open-spine surgery; nonelective procedures performed in the emergency department; obstetrical/gynecological surgery; orthopedic procedures; extensive plastic surgery; transplantation surgery except skin and corneal transplantation; trauma surgery; interactions with patients in situations during which the risk of the patient biting the physician is significant; and any open surgical procedure with a duration of more than 3 h, probably necessitating glove change |
ACS |
Not provided |
Canada |
Procedures during which transmission of HBV, HCV, or HIV from a HCW to patients is most likely to occur and includes the following: (1) digital palpation of a needle tip in a body cavity or the simultaneous presence of the HCW’s fingers and a needle or other sharp instrument or object in a blind or highly confined anatomic site; (2) repair of major traumatic injuries; or (3) major cutting or removal of any oral or perioral tissue, including tooth structures, during which there is potential for the patient’s open tissues to be exposed to the blood of an injured HCW |
UK |
Exposure-prone procedures are those invasive procedures where there is a risk that injury to the worker may result in the exposure of the patient’s open tissues to the blood of the worker. These include procedures where the worker’s gloved hands may be in contact with sharp instruments, needle tips or sharp tissues inside a patient’s open body cavity, wound, or confined anatomical space where the hands or fingertips may not be completely visible at all times |
Europe |
Exposure-prone procedures are invasive procedures where there is potential for contact between the skin of the HCW and sharp surgical instruments, needles, or sharp tissues in body cavities or poorly visualized/confined body sites |
Australia |
Category 1: A procedure where the hands and fingertips of the HCW are visible and outside of the body most of the time and the possibility of injury to the worker’s gloved hands from sharp instruments and/or tissues is slight |
Category 2: A procedure where the fingertips of the HCW may not be visible at all times but injury to the worker’s gloved hands from sharp instruments and/or tissues is unlikely. If injury occurs it is likely to be noticed and acted upon quickly to avoid the HCW’s blood contaminating a patient’s open tissues |
Category 3: A procedure where the fingertips are out of sight for a significant part of the procedure, or during certain critical stages, and in which there is a distinct risk of injury to the worker’s gloved hands from sharp instruments and/or tissues. In such circumstances it is possible that exposure of the patient’s open tissues to the HCW’s blood may go unnoticed or would not be noticed immediately |
- Citation: Lewis JD, Enfield KB, Sifri CD. Hepatitis B in healthcare workers: Transmission events and guidance for management. World J Hepatol 2015; 7(3): 488-497
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v7/i3/488.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v7.i3.488