Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Hepatol. Jul 8, 2015; 7(13): 1782-1787
Published online Jul 8, 2015. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i13.1782
Published online Jul 8, 2015. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i13.1782
Table 1 Total registrations by state
State | Total registrations | Rate per 100000 population |
CT | 1024 | 29.0 |
VT1 | 104 | 41.6 |
ME | 637 | 48.4 |
NH | 652 | 50.0 |
RI | 655 | 62.8 |
MA | 5241 | 80.4 |
Table 2 Details of significant clusters in 2012
Cluster | Cluster type | Listed | Expected | Relative risk | Significance | ZIP codes | Population |
1 | High | 114 | 39 | 3.3 | << 0.0001 | 63 | 683114 |
2 | High | 198 | 144 | 1.5 | 0.039 | 165 | 2554406 |
3 | Low | 107 | 171 | 0.57 | 0.00025 | 710 | 3027545 |
4 | Low | 34 | 67 | 0.48 | 0.055 | 89 | 1191886 |
- Citation: Ghaoui R, Garb J, Gordon F, Pomfret E. Impact of geography on organ allocation: Beyond the distance to the transplantation center. World J Hepatol 2015; 7(13): 1782-1787
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v7/i13/1782.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v7.i13.1782