Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Hepatol. May 27, 2014; 6(5): 326-339
Published online May 27, 2014. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v6.i5.326
Published online May 27, 2014. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v6.i5.326
Table 1 Direct-acting antivirals approved or at the computed tomography stage (phase II or III )
NS3/4A protease inhibitors | Polymerase inhibitors | Inhibitors | ||
Nucleotides/nucleosides | Non-nucleoside | NS5A | Cyclophilin | |
Generation I: Boceprevir (Merck)1 Telaprevir (Vertex)1 | PSI-7977 (Pharmasset)1 PSI-938 (Pharmasset)1 Mericitabine (Roche/ Genentech)1 IDX-184 (Idenix) | Filibuvir (Pfizer)1 VX-222 (Vertex)1 Tegobuvir (Gilead)1 ANA-598 (Anadys)1 ABT-072 (Abbott)1 ABT-333 (Abbott)1 | Daclatasvir (Bristol-Myers Squibb) GS-5885 (Gilead)1 | Alisporivir (Novartis)1 SCY-635 (Scynexis)1 |
Generation II: Simeprevir (Tibotec) BI 201335 (Boehringer Ingelheim) Danoprevir (Roche/Genentech), studied with Ritonavir; Vaniprevir (Merck)2 BMS-650032 (Bristol-Myers Squibb)2 GS-9451 (Gilead)1 GS-9256 (Gilead)2 ACH-1625 (Achillion)1 ABT-450 (Abbott) MK-5172 (Merck)1 |
Table 2 General protease inhibitor description with computed tomography results since 2011
PI | Genotype | PI treatment duration (wk) | Treatment duration (wk) | Treatment regimen | PEG-IFNα | Publication date |
Telaprevir | 1а/1b/1с/unknown | 12/8 | 20/24/44/48 | 750 mg TID | (+) | 2011 |
Boceprevir | 1а/1b/unknown | 24/32/44 | 28/36/48 | 800 mg TID | (+) | 2011 |
Daclatasvir | 1а/1b | 24 | 24 | 60 mg/d | (+/-) | 2012 |
Asunaprevir | 1а/1b | 24 | 24 | 600 mg BID | (+/-) | 2012 |
АВТ-450 | 1а/1b | 12 | 12 | 250/150 mg/d | (-) | 2013 |
Table 3 Telaprevir: clinical parameters
RCT | Dose frequency | Duration | SVR | Possible AE |
Prove 1 | Each 8 h, 6 t/d | 24 wk: 12 wk of triple therapy, 12 wk of conventional treatment | 61% | Rash, anemia, nausea, diarrhea |
Advance | Every 8 h, 6 t/d | 24-48 wk: 8-12 wk of viral response-based treatment followed by conventional treatment | 69%-75% | Rash, anemia, nausea, diarrhea |
Illuminate | Every 8 h, 6 t/d | 24-48 wk: 12 wks of viral response-based treatment: 12 wk of triple therapy followed by conventional treatment | 64%-92% | Rash, anemia, nausea, diarrhea |
Optimize | Every 12 h, 6 t/d | 24-48 wk: 12 wk of viral response-based treatment: 12 wk of triple therapy followed by conventional treatment for 12 to 36 wk | 58%-81% (depending on fibrosis stage) | Rash, anemia, nausea |
Table 4 Adverse events under telaprevir-based therapy
Agent RCT | Telaprevir | ||||
Advance | Realize | Illuminate | |||
PR | T8/12PR | PR48 | (lead-in) T12PR48 | T12PR24/48 | |
Serious AE | 7% | 9% | 5% | 12% | 9% |
Discontinued AVT due to AE | 7% | 10% | 3% | 15%-11% | 18% |
Anorectal symptoms | 4% | 8%-13% | 7% | 15%-12% | - |
Taste disturbances | - | - | 6% | 12% | - |
Anemia | 19% | 39%-37% | 15% | 30%-36% | 39% |
Severe neutropenia | 19% | 17%-14% | 11% | 14%-13% | - |
Rash | 24% | 35%-37% | 19% | 37%-36% | 37% |
Fatigue | 57% | 58%-57% | 40% | 55%-50% | 68% |
Pruritus | 36% | 45%-50% | 27% | 52%-50% | 51% |
Nausea | 31% | 40%-43% | 23% | 35%-33% | 47% |
Diarrhea | 22% | 32%-28% | 14% | 25%-26% | 30% |
Table 5 Boceprevir: clinical parameters
RCT | Dose frequency | Duration | SVR | Possible AE |
SPRINT 1 | 12 pills for 3 intakes | 28-wk triple therapy vs 4-wk lead-in phase | 54%-56% | Metal taste, anemia |
48-wk triple therapy vs 4-wk lead-in phase | 67%-75% | |||
SPRINT 2 | 12 pills for 3 intakes | 28-48 wk: ''viral response-based treatment''; ''lead-in period''; if HCV RNA (-) by week 8 and 24, to stop at week 28; if HCV RNA (+), 20 wk of double therapy | 67% And 44% were given abridged AVT | Taste disturbances, anemia, neutropenia |
Table 6 Adverse events under triple therapy
AgentRCT | Boceprevir | |||
SPRINT-2 | RESPOND-2 | |||
PR48 | PR4/ PRB24/44 | PR48 | PR4/ PRB32/44 | |
Serious AE | 9% | 11%-12% | 5% | 10%-14% |
Discontinued AVT due to AE | 16% | 12%-16% | 2% | 8%-12% |
Anorectal symptoms | - | - | - | - |
Taste disturbances | 18% | 37%-43% | 11% | 43%-45% |
Anemia | 29% | 49% | 20% | 43%-46% |
Severe neutropenia | 14% | 24%-25% | 9% | 19%-20% |
Rash | 23% | 25%-24% | 5% | 17%-14% |
Fatigue | 60% | 53%-57% | 50% | 53.7%-57.1% |
Pruritus | 27% | 24%-26% | 17.50% | 18.5%-19.3% |
Nausea | 42% | 48%-43% | 37.50% | 43.8%-39.1% |
Diarrhea | 22% | 22%-27% | 15% | 22.8%-23% |
Table 7 Effectiveness of combined therapy with asunaprevir n (%)
Null response(n = 21) | Contraindications to IFN-basedtherapy (n = 22) | |
RVR4 | 20 (95.2) | 15 (68.2) |
RVR12 | 19 (90.5) | 14 (63.6) |
SVR24 | 19 (90.5) | 14 (63.6) |
Table 8 Adverse event structure for asunaprevir
Lok et al[35] AI447-011 | Suzuki et al[36] | |||
ASV + DCV + conventional therapy(n = 10) | ASV + DCV(n = 11) | Null response (n = 21) | Contraindications to IFN-based therapy (n = 22) | |
Diarrhea | 70.0% | 72.7% | 43% | 9% |
Fatigue | 70.0% | 54.5% | -1 | -1 |
Headache | 50.0% | 45.5% | 38% | 27% |
Nausea | 50.0% | 18.2% | -1 | -1 |
Coughing | 20.0% | 27.3% | -1 | -1 |
Subfebrile temperature | 27.3% | 10.0% | 14% | 23% |
Table 9 AVIATOR, phase IIa study (combination of ABT-450 + ritonavir + ABT-333 + ribavirin)
Study arm | n | Genotype | Status | Combination | Duration | Treatment regimen | SVR |
Total: group 1 + 2 | 33 | 1а/1b (28/5) | Naive | АВТ-450 + ritonavir + АВТ-333 + ribavirin | 12 wk | АВТ-450, 250 mg/d or 150 mg/d + ritonavir, 100 mg/d; АВТ-333, 400 mg BID; ribavirin, body weight-based | 93%-95% |
3 | 17 | 1а/1b (16/1) | partial virologic response, null response | АВТ-450 + ritonavir + АВТ-333 + ribavirin | 12 wk | АВТ-450, 150 mg/d; ritonavir, 100 mg/d; АВТ-333, 400 mg BID; ribavirin, body weight-based | 47% |
Table 10 SVR rate depending on IL28B polymorphism
Study arm | Status | CC-genotype | CT-genotype | TT-genotype | SVR |
1 | Naive | 10/9 | 7/7 | 2/2 | 95% |
2 | Naive | 5/4 | 7/7 | 2/2 | 93% |
3 | Partial virologic response, null response | 0/0 | 12/6 | 5/2 | 47% |
Table 11 Adverse event incidence of ABT-450 + ritonavir + ABT-333 + ribavirin combination
AEs with incidence above 20% | AE incidence |
Headache | 14%-26% |
Fatigue | 35%-47% |
Insomnia | 0-26% |
Nausea | 21%-24% |
Rash | 6%-21% |
Table 12 SVR rate in genotype 1 hepatitis C virus patients n (%)
GS-9256 + tegobuvir(n = 15) | GS-9256 + tegobuvir + ribavirin by weight (n = 13) | GS-9256 + tegobuvir + ribavirin by weight + PEG-IFNα(n = 14) | |
Week 4, RVR | 1/15 (7) | 6/13 (46) | 10/14 (71) |
Week 12, EVR | 3/15 (20) | 8/13 (62) | 14/14 (100) |
Week 24, SVR | 10/15 (67) | 13/13 (100) | 13/14 (94) |
Table 13 Most common adverse event after 4 treatment weeks
GS-9256 + tegobuvir | GS-9256 + tegobuvir + ribavirin by weight | GS-9256 + tegobuvir + ribavirin by weight + PEG-IFN1 | |
AE incidence | 50% | 93% | 81%-100% |
Anemia | 0 | 0 | 0-13% |
Eye pain | 0 | 0 | 0-13% |
Diarrhea | 19% | 20% | 6%-40% |
Nausea | 13% | 20% | 6%-40% |
Flu-like syndrome | 0 | 0 | 44%-80% |
Fatigue | 6% | 33% | 13%-33% |
Headache | 31% | 47% | 13%-40% |
Insomnia | 0 | 20% | 6%-13% |
Dry skin | 0 | 13% | 0% |
Pruritus | 6% | 20% | 0%-7% |
Table 14 SVR dependence in null responders for various direct-acting antiviral combinations
Ref. | n | Combination | Duration | SVR |
Zeuzem et al[39] | 37 | Telaprevir-based triple therapy | 48 wk | 33% |
Bacon et al[25] | 58 | Boceprevir-based triple therapy | 48 wk | 52% |
Lok et al[35] | 11 | DCV + ASV | 24 wk | 36% |
Lok et al[35] | 10 | DCV + ASV + conventional therapy | 24 wk | 90% |
Suzuki et al[36] | 21 | |||
Poordad et al[37] | 7 | ABT-450 + ritonavir + АВТ-333 + ribavirin | 12 wk | 43% |
- Citation: Bakulin I, Pasechnikov V, Varlamicheva A, Sannikova I. NS3 protease inhibitors for treatment of chronic hepatitis C: Efficacy and safety. World J Hepatol 2014; 6(5): 326-339
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v6/i5/326.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v6.i5.326