BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Hepatol. Sep 27, 2026; 18(9): 124789
Published online Sep 27, 2026. doi: 10.4254/wjh.124789
Table 1 Selected classification systems for bile duct tumor thrombus in hepatocellular carcinoma
Classification
Type
Definition
Interpretive use
Satoh1BDTT in a first-order hepatic duct branch without reaching the right-left duct confluenceAnatomically limited intraductal extension
Satoh2BDTT extending across the right-left hepatic duct confluenceHilar involvement
Satoh3BDTT separated from the primary HCC and growing in the common bile ductDetached/distal intraductal disease
Zhou et al[11]IMicroscopic BDTTDetected pathologically
Zhou et al[11]IIResectable primary or recurrent HCC with BDTTResectability-oriented category
Zhou et al[11]IIIBDTT without an obvious intrahepatic HCC massHigh diagnostic-mimic risk
Zhou et al[11]IVBDTT with unresectable intrahepatic or extrahepatic HCCSystemic/non-surgical disease context
Zhou et al[11]a/bSubclassified by presence/absence of extrahepatic bile duct wall invasionProposed surgical-pathology modifier
Table 2 Source-verified clinical outcomes in selected hepatocellular carcinoma-specific biliary drainage studies
Ref.
Cohort and drainage
Clinical response definition
Verified drainage results
Key findings
Lee et al[4], 2002Retrospective; 22 patients; PTBD> 50% reduction in total bilirubin within 4 weeksGood response: 13/22 (59.1%)Lower baseline bilirubin favored response; survival was not reported in the verified abstract
Hong et al[23], 2008Retrospective; 15 patients, 19 sessions; percutaneous SEMS≥ 30% decrease in total bilirubin or total bilirubin < 2 mg/dLTechnical: 15/15 (100.0%); clinical: 11/15 (73.3%)Major complications: 2/19 sessions (10.5%); mean stent patency: 149.8 days (range: 12-790 days)
Cho et al[19], 2011Retrospective; 68 patients; ERBD or PTBD> 30% decrease in total bilirubin within 4 weeksEffective drainage: 51.5% (numerator not stated in the verified abstract)Additional HCC treatment was more frequent after effective drainage; mean survival: 247 days vs 44 days
Choi et al[24], 2012Retrospective; 60 patients; ERBD 29, PTBD 31Study-defined successful drainageERBD: 22/29 (75.9%); PTBD: 15/31 (48.4%)Median patency: 82 days vs 37 days; median survival after successful vs unsuccessful drainage: 143 days vs 38 days
Choi et al[7], 2013Retrospective; 60 patients; ERBD or PTBDStudy-defined successful drainageSuccessful drainage: 39/60 (65.0%)TACE was given to 17/39 responders; median survival: 410 days vs 77 days for TACE vs conservative care, with major selection bias
Lu et al[22], 2013Retrospective; 16 patients; PTBD with external/internal drainage or covered stentImprovement in clinical symptoms and quality of lifeTechnical: 16/16 (100.0%); symptom/quality-of-life improvement: 12/16 (75.0%)Immediate biliary hemorrhage: 5/16; hemorrhage with infection: 3/16; median survival: 199.5 days (mean: 203.7 days)
Choi et al[25], 2013Retrospective ITT; 111 patients; attempted endoscopic drainageStudy-defined favorable responseFavorable response: 46/111 (41.4%); cannulation failed in 5/111Further HCC treatment: 40/46 responders (87.0%); median survival: 8.7 months vs 1.3 months for responders vs nonresponders
Sugiyama et al[20], 2014Retrospective; 36 patients; endoscopic stenting≥ 50% reduction in total bilirubinTechnical: 36/36 (100.0%); clinical: 27/36 (75.0%)No early complications; late complications: 13/36 (36.1%); median patency: 43 days; median survival: 150 days vs 22 days
Chung et al[17], 2015Retrospective; 96 patients; SEMS 36, plastic stent 60Study-defined successful drainageSEMS: 25/36 (69.4%); plastic: 39/60 (65.0%)Adverse events: 6/36 (16.7%) vs 13/60 (21.7%); median patency: 60 days vs 68 days; median survival: 48 days vs 123 days
Woo et al[18], 2017Retrospective; 74 patients, 76 attempted procedures; endoscopic drainageTotal bilirubin < 3 mg/dLTechnical: 70/76 (92.1%); clinical: 25/70 (35.7%)Post-drainage HCC treatment was associated with survival; median survival: 28 days overall. An internally inconsistent re-aggravation percentage was not reproduced
Matsumi et al[16], 2021Multicenter retrospective; 107 patients; endoscopic drainage≥ 30% reduction in jaundice after technical success; cholangitis resolution when applicableTechnical: 105/107 (98.1%); clinical: 85/105 (81.0%)ERC-related complications: 3/107 (2.8%); 41/107 received HCC treatment after EBD; median survival: 5.0 months vs 0.93 months
Wang et al[21], 2022Multicenter retrospective; 138 patients; PTBDAt 4 weeks: Any total bilirubin decrease or nadir < 5, < 3, or < 2 mg/dL as separate endpointsNo single pooled clinical-success rate was reportedInternal prediction-model study restricted to HBV-related cirrhosis; external validation is required
Tachi et al[26], 2025Retrospective; 10 patients, 14 attempts, 11 evaluable procedures; EUS-HGSImproved cholangitis or ≥ 50% reduction in total bilirubin within 4 weeksTechnical: 13/14 (92.9%); clinical: 10/11 (90.9%); ≥ 50% reduction by 2 weeks: 8/11 (72.7%)Mild adverse events: 3/11 (27.3%); no bleeding; survival was not reported
Table 3 Potential treatment approaches after biliary drainage in hepatocellular carcinoma with obstructive jaundice
Disease setting
Potential approach after successful drainage
Evidence basis and limitation
Resectable disease with adequate hepatic reserveHepatectomy with thrombectomy and selective bile duct resection when required for complete resectionRetrospective surgical cohorts; strong selection by anatomy, hepatic reserve, and tumor stage
Unresectable, intrahepatic-predominant diseaseTACE in selected patients; HAIC or focal radiotherapy only after case-specific multidisciplinary review or in trialsTACE: Retrospective HCC-OJ cohorts; HAIC/radiotherapy: Small series, case reports, or extrapolation
Advanced disease with PVTT or extrahepatic spreadSystemic therapy only after adequate hepatic recovery and infection control; clinical trial preferredNo direct prospective OJ evidence; recommendations extrapolated from broader HCC trials
Transplant considerationExceptionally selected, center-specific assessment; not a standard indicationSmall single-center retrospective series; no validated general selection criteria
Inadequate drainage response or progressive hepatic failureDrainage optimization, infection control, symptom palliation, best supportive care, and reassessmentClinical-practice framework; no comparative prospective evidence


Write to the Help Desk