Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Hepatol. May 27, 2025; 17(5): 105446
Published online May 27, 2025. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v17.i5.105446
Published online May 27, 2025. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v17.i5.105446
Table 1 Comparison of 18-fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography computed tomography and conventional imaging in biliary tract cancer
Parameter | 18-fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography computed tomography | Computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging |
Spatial resolution | Moderate (4-5 mm) | High (0.5-2 mm) |
Metabolic activity assessment | Yes (based on maximum standardized uptake value or total lesion glycolysis) | No |
Primary tumour sensitivity | Sensitive to hypermetabolic tumors, hypometabolism or small lesions (< 5 mm) may be missed | Show structural abnormalities and details. Low sensitivity for early lesions |
LN metastasis sensitivity | Sensitive to metabolically active LNs, inflammatory LNs may be misclassified as metastases | Depending on LN size (≥ 10 mm) and enhancement characteristics, easy to miss normal size metastatic LNs |
Distant metastasis sensitivity | Efficient detection of liver, bone and other sites of metastasis | Limited by the scanning range, peritoneal metastasis may be missed |
Cost | High | Moderate |
Applicable scenario | Staging, recurrence monitoring and prognosis prediction | Assessment of anatomical details and local infiltration |
- Citation: Yin JX, Fan X, Chen QL, Chen J, He J. Progress in the application of fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography computed tomography in biliary tract cancer. World J Hepatol 2025; 17(5): 105446
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v17/i5/105446.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v17.i5.105446