Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Hepatol. May 27, 2025; 17(5): 104724
Published online May 27, 2025. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v17.i5.104724
Published online May 27, 2025. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v17.i5.104724
Table 1 Diagnosis of hepatorenal syndrome
Key points of diagnosis |
Cirrhosis with ascites |
Increase in serum creatinine ≥ 0.3 mg/dL (26.5 mol/L) within 48 hours or ≥ 50% from baseline value known or presumed to have occurred within the prior 7 days and/or urinary output ≤ 0.5 mL/kg for ≥ 6 hours |
Absence of improvement in serum creatinine and/or urine output within 24 hours following adequate volume resuscitation (when clinically indicated) |
Absence of strong evidence for alternative explanation as the primary cause of AKI |
Table 2 Serum biomarkers, urinary biomarkers, and hemodynamic parameters to differentiate among pre-renal acute kidney injury, acute tubular necrosis, and hepatorenal syndrome
Parameters | Pre-renal AKI | Hepatorenal syndrome | Acute tubular necrosis | Comments |
Clue to diagnose | History of fluid loss or overzealous use of diuretics | Presence of refractory ascites, hyponatremia | Presence of sepsis and hypotension | History cannot be always reliable to diagnose the subtypes of kidney injury |
Urine sediments[73,74] | The lack of any casts suggests functional renal failure mostly pre-renal AKI[56] | Usually absent | Muddy brown casts and renal tubular epithelial cell casts | Should be interpreted by expert renal pathologists |
Sensitivity: 73% | RETC and granular cast | |||
Specificity: 75% | PPV: 100% | |||
However, bland, hyaline cast may be present | NPV: 40% | |||
FENa[27,75] | < 1 | < 1 for diagnosing HRS-AKI | Usually > 1 | FENa is unable to distinguish between Pre-renal AKI and HRS-AKI |
Sensitivity: 90% | Sensitivity: 100% | Sensitivity: 89% | Not validated in patients on diuretics | |
Specificity: 82% | Specificity: 14% | Specificity: 71% | FENa can be < 1 in patients with cirrhosis without AKI | |
To differentiate between intrinsic vs pre-renal kidney injury | AASLD | FENa < 0.56 excludes ATN | ||
< 0.1 suggests HRS[46] | ||||
FEUrea[29] | < 21 | < 28.7 | > 33 | No standardized cut-off in patients with cirrhosis |
Sensitivity: 90% | Sensitivity: 75% | < 34 to rule out ATN | ||
Specificity: 61% | Specificity: 83% | Sensitivity: 70% | ||
For PRA vs HRS | For non-HRS vs HRS | Specificity: 58% | ||
NGAL-1[35,36,38,39] | < 110 | < 100 | > 194 mcg/g Cr | |
Sensitivity: 88% | Sensitivity: 91% | |||
Specificity: 85% | Specificity: 82% | |||
Renal artery resistive index[76,77] | Cannot differentiate between prerenal AKI and AKI-HRS | > 0.7 predicts HRS[76] | > 0.8 is suggestive of ATN[77] | RARI is higher in patients with cirrhosis and ascites compared to healthy individuals |
> 0.77 predicts HRS in cirrhosis | RARI is higher in ATN than in HRS. | |||
Sensitivity: 100% | ||||
Specificity: 77% |
Table 3 Commonly used kidney biomarkers in patients with cirrhosis
Newer markers | Role in differentiating between ATN and HRS | As a predictor of mortality | Role in diagnosing HRS-AKI | Comments |
NGAL[35,36,38,39] | 417 mg/g Cr in ATN and 76 ug/g Cr in HRS | uNGAL 110 ng/mL is associated with inpatient mortality[53] | Increased in 1-2 hours after ischaemic renal injury | Can be high in other diseases. Higher synthesis in the presence of sepsis. High in lupus nephritis, IgA nephropathy[41] |
KIM-1[47,53] | Differentiate HRS from ATN; Cut-off: 15.4 ng/mL (AUC: 0.63); HRS: 3.1 pg/mL | No data | Early rise predicts AKI; Better marker than creatinine[53] | Not widely available |
Cystatin C[42-45,55] | No data | Serum cystatin-C level of > 1.45 mg/L had the highest 90-day mortality (sensitivity and specificity of 66.7% and 68.4%)[44]. Cystatin-MELD score predicts mortality[45] | Predicts development of AKI in one year[55]; Serum cystatin-C > 1.47 mg/dL is an early marker of AKI in cirrhosis[44,45] | Higher reliability than Cr in patients with sarcopenia |
- Citation: Malakar S, Rungta S, Samanta A, Shamsul Hoda U, Mishra P, Pande G, Roy A, Giri S, Rai P, Mohindra S, Ghoshal UC. Understanding acute kidney injury in cirrhosis: Current perspective. World J Hepatol 2025; 17(5): 104724
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v17/i5/104724.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v17.i5.104724