Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Hepatol. May 27, 2025; 17(5): 104724
Published online May 27, 2025. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v17.i5.104724
Table 1 Diagnosis of hepatorenal syndrome
Key points of diagnosis
Cirrhosis with ascites
Increase in serum creatinine ≥ 0.3 mg/dL (26.5 mol/L) within 48 hours or ≥ 50% from baseline value known or presumed to have occurred within the prior 7 days and/or urinary output ≤ 0.5 mL/kg for ≥ 6 hours
Absence of improvement in serum creatinine and/or urine output within 24 hours following adequate volume resuscitation (when clinically indicated)
Absence of strong evidence for alternative explanation as the primary cause of AKI
Table 2 Serum biomarkers, urinary biomarkers, and hemodynamic parameters to differentiate among pre-renal acute kidney injury, acute tubular necrosis, and hepatorenal syndrome
Parameters
Pre-renal AKI
Hepatorenal syndrome
Acute tubular necrosis
Comments
Clue to diagnoseHistory of fluid loss or overzealous use of diureticsPresence of refractory ascites, hyponatremiaPresence of sepsis and hypotensionHistory cannot be always reliable to diagnose the subtypes of kidney injury
Urine sediments[73,74]The lack of any casts suggests functional renal failure mostly pre-renal AKI[56]Usually absentMuddy brown casts and renal tubular epithelial cell castsShould be interpreted by expert renal pathologists
Sensitivity: 73%RETC and granular cast
Specificity: 75%PPV: 100%
However, bland, hyaline cast may be presentNPV: 40%
FENa[27,75]< 1< 1 for diagnosing HRS-AKIUsually > 1FENa is unable to distinguish between Pre-renal AKI and HRS-AKI
Sensitivity: 90%Sensitivity: 100%Sensitivity: 89%Not validated in patients on diuretics
Specificity: 82%Specificity: 14%Specificity: 71%FENa can be < 1 in patients with cirrhosis without AKI
To differentiate between intrinsic vs pre-renal kidney injuryAASLDFENa < 0.56 excludes ATN
< 0.1 suggests HRS[46]
FEUrea[29]< 21< 28.7> 33No standardized cut-off in patients with cirrhosis
Sensitivity: 90%Sensitivity: 75%< 34 to rule out ATN
Specificity: 61%Specificity: 83%Sensitivity: 70%
For PRA vs HRSFor non-HRS vs HRSSpecificity: 58%
NGAL-1[35,36,38,39]< 110< 100> 194 mcg/g Cr
Sensitivity: 88%Sensitivity: 91%
Specificity: 85%Specificity: 82%
Renal artery resistive index[76,77]Cannot differentiate between prerenal AKI and AKI-HRS> 0.7 predicts HRS[76]> 0.8 is suggestive of ATN[77]RARI is higher in patients with cirrhosis and ascites compared to healthy individuals
> 0.77 predicts HRS in cirrhosisRARI is higher in ATN than in HRS.
Sensitivity: 100%
Specificity: 77%
Table 3 Commonly used kidney biomarkers in patients with cirrhosis
Newer markers
Role in differentiating between ATN and HRS
As a predictor of mortality
Role in diagnosing HRS-AKI
Comments
NGAL[35,36,38,39]417 mg/g Cr in ATN and 76 ug/g Cr in HRSuNGAL 110 ng/mL is associated with inpatient mortality[53]Increased in 1-2 hours after ischaemic renal injuryCan be high in other diseases. Higher synthesis in the presence of sepsis. High in lupus nephritis, IgA nephropathy[41]
KIM-1[47,53]Differentiate HRS from ATN; Cut-off: 15.4 ng/mL (AUC: 0.63); HRS: 3.1 pg/mLNo dataEarly rise predicts AKI; Better marker than creatinine[53]Not widely available
Cystatin C[42-45,55]No dataSerum cystatin-C level of > 1.45 mg/L had the highest 90-day mortality (sensitivity and specificity of 66.7% and 68.4%)[44]. Cystatin-MELD score predicts mortality[45]Predicts development of AKI in one year[55]; Serum cystatin-C > 1.47 mg/dL is an early marker of AKI in cirrhosis[44,45]Higher reliability than Cr in patients with sarcopenia