BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Hepatol. Nov 27, 2025; 17(11): 112364
Published online Nov 27, 2025. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v17.i11.112364
Table 1 Patients’ baseline characteristics evaluated by modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, n (%)
Characteristic
Response group (CR + PR, n = 22)
Non-response group (SD + PD, n = 11)
P value
Median age (year)0.488
    < 6013 (59)5 (46)
    ≥ 609 (41)6 (54)
Sex0.033a
    Male21 (95)7 (64)
    Female1 (5)4 (36)
ECOG PS0.017a
    018 (82)4 (36)
    14 (18)7 (64)
BCLC stage1.000
    B11 (50)5 (45)
    C11 (50)6 (55)
Tumor number1.000
    112 (55)6 (55)
    2-36 (27)3 (27)
    ≥ 44 (18)2 (18)
Size of the largest tumor (cm)0.593
    < 53 (14)2 (18)
    5-1010 (45)3 (27)
    ≥ 109 (41)6 (55)
Serum alpha-fetoprotein level0.488
    < 400 ng/mL13 (59)5 (45)
    ≥ 400 ng/mL9 (41)6 (55)
Conversion to surgery0.132
    Yes11 (50)2 (18)
    No 11 (50)9 (82)
Table 2 Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis of factors associated with progression-free survival (backward stepwise selection with Wald criteria)

Number
Univariate HR
P value
Multivariate HR
P value
Tumor number (single/multiple)18/150.33 (0.14-0.78)0.010.31 (0.11-0.85)0.02
AFP (< 400/≥ 400 ng/mL)18/150.49 (0.22-1.11)0.09--
CUX1 (wild/mutant) 30/30.22 (0.06-0.79)0.02--
LINC01554 (high/Low)15/150.32 (0.13-0.79)0.010.16 (0.05-0.49)0.01
WHRN (high/Low) 15/150.39 (0.16-0.94)0.04--
CD4+ Tcm (high/Low)9/210.43 (0.16-1.19)0.100.29 (0.08-0.98)0.05