Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Hepatol. Sep 27, 2022; 14(9): 1694-1703
Published online Sep 27, 2022. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v14.i9.1694
Published online Sep 27, 2022. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v14.i9.1694
Modality | Accuracy | Advantage | Disadvantage |
Anthropometry | Low | Simple, rapid, not affected by fluid retention | Interobserver variability |
BIA | Moderate | Easy, portable, relatively inexpensive | Influenced by volume status, requires special equipment |
Ultrasound | Moderate to high | Inexpensive, radiation-free, bedside | Interobserver variability |
DEXA scan | High | Suitable for repeat testing | Radiation exposure & high cost (but less than CT scan) |
CT scan | High | Allows direct assessment of muscle mass | Radiation and contrast exposure, high cost |
MRI | High | No radiation exposure, allows direct assessment of muscle mass | Expensive, lacks cut-off values |
- Citation: Haj Ali S, Abu Sneineh A, Hasweh R. Nutritional assessment in patients with liver cirrhosis. World J Hepatol 2022; 14(9): 1694-1703
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v14/i9/1694.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v14.i9.1694