Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Hepatol. Apr 27, 2022; 14(4): 696-707
Published online Apr 27, 2022. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v14.i4.696
Table 1 Major advantages and limitations of noninvasive periportal fibrosis markers in Schistosomiasis mansoni infected patients
FeatureLiver biopsy
Serum markersImaging techniques
Wedged
Percutaneous
US
pSWE
TE
InvasivenessHighHighMinimalNoneNoneNone
Post-procedural riskPossiblePossibleMinimalNoneNoneNone
Accuracy for PPF predictionHighLowMedium to highHighGoodGood
SensitivityHighLowMediumHighMediumMedium
InterpretationSubjectiveSubjectiveObjectiveSubjectiveObjectiveObjective
Observer variabilityHighHighLowHighNot yet evaluatedNot yet evaluated
CostsHighMediumDependsMediumMediumMedium
Limitations by anthropometric featuresHighHighNoneMediumMediumMedium
Suitability for monitoring PPFLowLowHighHighHighHigh
Table 2 Major advantages and limitations of noninvasive periportal fibrosis markers in Schistosomiasis mansoni infected patients
PFF markers
Advantages
Limitations
Direct markers
PICPElevated levels in patients not treated yet with praziquantel and related to the stage of fibrosis and necroinflammationNot reliable for establishing fibrosis grade
P3NPUse for complicated patients who developed hypertension and with more severe liver diseasesLow sensitivity in mild cases
Serum type VI collagenCorrelated with liver fibrosis, splenomegaly, portal vein dilatation and the presence of portosystemic collateralsLow sensitivity
Hyaluronic acidMarker for the initial phase of liver fibrosis and it is able to assess the severity of liver diseaseHigh levels in different etiologies of liver disease, barely accessible
Indirect markers
APRILow cost, good sensitivity, high diagnostic accuracy for cirrhosisInterference of hepatic comorbidities
Blood platelet countLow cost and sensitive marker. It is a marker of portal hypertension and inversely correlated with advanced PPF and the diameter of the spleenInterference of coagulopathies, some drugs and other live disorders
GGTLow cost. Correlated with more advanced PPF, faster fibrosis progression rate and indicates intrahepatic alterationsInterference of hepatobiliary alterations
Coutinho IndexSimplicity of calculation and low costRequires more tests for use in mild and moderate fibrosis
Table 3 Performance of indirect periportal fibrosis markers in Schistosomiasis mansoni infected patients
MarkerParametersPerformance in S. mansoni infected patients
Severe PPF
Mild/significant PPF
Cut-off
Sn (%)
Sp (%)
Cut-off
Sn (%)
Sp (%)
Platelet count[17,26]Platelet count/mm3141000[17]78.560171000[17], 108500[26]80, 9191.7, 85
APRI[17,26](AST/ULN)/platelet count1.06658.571.10.349[17], 0.440[26]90, 9683.3, 85
GGT[17]GGT/ULN> 1.5560.075.6> 0.8474.683.3
Coutinho index[29,30](ALP/ULN)/platelet count≥ 0.330[29], ≥ 0.316[30]98, 67.494.7, 68.3≥ 0.300, ≥ 0.22870.8, 68.689.5, 46.3
Table 4 Image pattern classification of periportal fibrosis according to the World Health Organization[37]
IP
Description
ANormal
BDiffuse echogenic foci (“starry sky”), minimal wall thickening of portal and segmental branches
CRing echoes around vessels in cross-section; pipe-stems parallel with portal vessels
DEchogenic ruff around portal bifurcation and main stem; main portal vessel wall thickening
EHyper-echogenic patches expanding into parenchyma
FEchogenic bands and streaks extending from main portal vein and its bifurcatin to liver surface; may retract the surface of the organ
XCirrhosis
YFatty liver
ZOther hepato-biliary diseases
Table 5 Performance reported in the literature of noninvasive periportal fibrosis imaging techniques in Schistosomiasis mansoni infected patients
MarkerParametersPerformance in schistosoma infected patients
Severe PPF
Mild/significant PPF
Cut-off
Cut-off
HS
HSS
HIS
US[37]Image interpretation (Niamey sonographic protocol)DE/F-
TE[20,51,53,57]Wave propagation speed (kPa)-9.6 kPa[57], 8.9 kPa[51], 9.7 kPa[20], 9.5 kPa[53]-
Pswe[19,51,42]Wave propagation speed (m/s; kPa)1.33 m/s[51]1.39 m/s[19], 1.53 m/s[52]1.11 m/s[19], 1.29 m/s[52]
2D-SWE[54]Wave propagation speed (m/s; kPa)-14.9 kPa[54]-
Table 6 Advantages and limitations of noninvasive periportal fibrosis techniques frequently used in clinical practice with regard to Schistosomiasis mansoni infected patients
Techniques
Advantages
Limitations
Blood Platelet CountLow cost, routine laboratory test, easy accessDifficult to diagnose patients with initial PPF
APRILow cost, based on routine laboratory tests, easy accessMore frequently used to diagnose patients with portal hyperpertension and esophageal varices, less sensitive for PPF
Coutinho indexLow cost, based on routine laboratory tests (alkaline phosphatase and platelet count), easy access, lets advanced PPF be identifiedThese tests need to be validated in other centers
UltrasoundLow cost, safe and based on the Niamey-WHO protocolOperator dependent
MRI/CTMRI is more sensitive than ultrasound at diagnosing PPFExpensive, use of radiation, not available in endemic areas, no relation with the Niamey-WHO protocol
Liver elastographyGood accuracy, distinguishes mild from significant PPF Expensive, not available in endemic areas
Spleen elastographyRelated to portal hypertensionExpensive, not available in endemic areas, needs further studies
Wedge liver biopsyGold standard used to diagnose Symmers fibrosisOnly for surgical patients
Percutaneous liver biopsyCan be used in differential diagnosis between schistosomiasis and other liver diseasesInsufficiently sensitive and so may fail to diagnose PPF