Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Hepatol. Mar 27, 2022; 14(3): 559-569
Published online Mar 27, 2022. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v14.i3.559
Published online Mar 27, 2022. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v14.i3.559
Table 1 Descriptive statistics for all data and all variables in the study
Total number of patients | 193 |
Age at diagnosis, years–mean ± SD | 50.7 (11.9) |
Gender | |
Female | 82 (42.5%) |
Male | 111 (57.5%) |
Aboriginal | 154 (79.8%) |
Residence | |
Alice Springs | 58 (30.1%) |
Alice Springs township | 31 (16.1%) |
Rural | 104 (53.9%) |
Risk factors | |
IVDU | 15 (7.9%) |
Hazardous alcohol intake | 137 (71.4%) |
Obesity | 63 (35.6%) |
Child-Pugh score | |
A | 94 (50%) |
B | 71 (37.8%) |
C | 23 (12.2%) |
MELD score–median (IQR) | 10 (8, 18) |
Decompensating event triggering admission | 58 (30.4%) |
Aetiology | |
Alcohol | 96 (49.7%) |
Hepatitis B | 22 (11.4%) |
NAFLD | 11 (5.7%) |
Hepatitis C | 9 (4.7%) |
Cardiac cirrhosis | 6 (3.1%) |
Cryptogenic | 6 (3.1%) |
Autoimmune hepatitis | 2 (1%) |
Biliary diseases | 2 (1%) |
NAFLD + Alcohol | 5 (2.6%) |
Hepatitis C + Alcohol | 11 (5.7%) |
Hepatitis B + Alcohol | 18 (9.3%) |
Cardiac cirrhosis + NAFLD | 3 (1.6%) |
Hepatitis B + NAFLD | 2 (1.0%) |
Participation in variceal surveillance | 75 (41.9%) |
Participation in HCC surveillance | 32 (20.3%) |
Development of HCC during study period | 29 (15.0%) |
Review in specialist clinic | 95 (49.5%) |
Referral for liver transplantation | 12 (6.4%) |
Table 2 Comparison of aboriginal vs non-aboriginal patients
Aboriginal | Non-aboriginal | P value | |
Total number | 154 (79.8%) | 39 (20.2%) | |
Age at diagnosis–mean ± SD | 48.4 (11.1) | 59.9 (10.9) | < 0.001 |
Gender–Female | 76 (49.4%) | 6 (15.4%) | < 0.001 |
Residence | < 0.001 | ||
Alice Springs | 24 (15.6%) | 34 (87.2%) | |
Alice Springs camp | 31 (20.1%) | 0 | |
Rural | 99 (64.3%) | 5 (12.8%) | |
Risk factors | |||
IVDU | 2 (1.3%) | 13 (33.3%) | < 0.001 |
Hazardous alcohol intake | 111 (72.6%) | 26 (66.7%) | 0.468 |
Obesity | 48 (34.5%) | 15 (38.4%) | 0.573 |
Child-Pugh score | 0.091 | ||
A | 69 (46.3%) | 25 (64.1%) | |
B | 62 (41.6%) | 9 (23.1%) | |
C | 18 (12.1%) | 5 (12.8%) | |
MELD score–median (IQR) | 11 (8, 20) | 10 (8, 12) | 0.026 |
Decompensating event triggering admission | 45 (29.4%) | 13 (34.2%) | 0.565 |
Aetiology | < 0.001 | ||
Alcohol | 86 (55.8%) | 10 (25.6%) | |
Hepatitis B | 20 (13.0%) | 2 (5.1%) | |
NAFLD | 12 (7.8%) | 2 (5.1%) | |
Hepatitis C | 1 (0.7%) | 8 (20.5%) | |
Cardiac cirrhosis | 4 (2.6%) | 2 (5.1%) | |
Cryptogenic | 4 (2.6%) | 2 (5.1%) | |
Autoimmune hepatitis | 1 (0.7%) | 1 (2.6%) | |
Biliary diseases | 0 | 2 (5.1%) | |
Hepatitis B + Alcohol | 18 (11.7%) | 0 | |
NAFLD + Alcohol | 5 (3.3%) | 0 | |
Hepatitis C + Alcohol | 1 (0.7%) | 10 (25.6%) | |
Hepatitis B + NAFLD | 2 (1.3%) | 0 | |
Variceal surveillance | 24 (17.8%) | 11 (34.4%) | 0.002 |
HCC surveillance | 21 (16.7%) | 11 (34.4%) | 0.038 |
Development of HCC | 21 (13.6%) | 8 (20.5%) | 0.283 |
Review in specialist clinic | 63 (41.2%) | 32 (84.1%) | < 0.001 |
Referral for liver transplantation | 5 (3.3%) | 7 (18.9%) | < 0.001 |
Table 3 Unadjusted and adjusted binary logistic models of hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance versus Aboriginal status
Risk factor | Surveillance participation | Comparison | Odds ratio (95%CI) | P value | Odds ratio (95%CI) | P value | |
Yes | No | Univariate | Multivariable | ||||
Aboriginal status-Yes | 18 | 95 | Yes vs No | 0.31 (0.13, 0.77) | 0.011 | 0.29 (0.10, 0.87) | 0.028 |
Age-mean ± SD | 51.7 (10.9) | 49.4 (10.8) | 1.02 (0.98, 1.06) | 0.308 | 1.00 (0.95, 1.04) | 0.866 | |
Gender–Male | 18 | 64 | Female vs Male | 0.80 (0.35, 1.84) | 0.398 | 1.10 (0.45, 2.71) | 0.838 |
Child-Pugh score | 0.930 | 0.950 | |||||
A | 18 | 65 | A vs B | 1.18 (0.51, 2.74) | 0.694 | 0.97 (0.40, 2.34) | 0.942 |
B | 11 | 47 | |||||
Residence | 0.026 | ||||||
Alice Springs | 14 | 27 | AS vs ASC | 11.41 (1.39, 93.66) | 0.023 | ||
Alice Springs camps | 1 | 22 | AS vs R | 2.37 (1.00, 5.64) | 0.05 | ||
Rural | 14 | 64 | AST vs R | 0.21 (0.03, 1.67) | 0.14 | ||
See specialist liver clinic–Yes | 26 | 52 | Yes vs No | 10.17 (2.91, 35.52) | < 0.001 |
Table 4 Unadjusted and adjusted binary logistic models of Variceal surveillance
Risk factor | Surveillance participation | Comparison | Odds ratio (95%CI) | P value | Odds ratio (95%CI) | P value | |
Yes | No | Univariate | Multivariable | ||||
Aboriginal Status-Yes | 51 | 90 | Yes vs No | 0.31 (0.14, 0.65) | 0.002 | 0.29 (0.12, 0.69) | 0.005 |
Age-mean ± SD | 51.9 (11.6) | 49.2 (11.2) | 1.02 (0.99, 1.04) | 0.116 | 1.01 (0.98, 1.04) | 0.621 | |
Gender–Male | 43 | 59 | Female vs Male | 1.00 (0.55, 1.82) | 0.995 | 1.36 (0.70, 2.63) | 0.358 |
Child-Pugh score | 0.930 | 0.950 | |||||
A | 39 | 51 | A vs B | 1.13 (0.60, 2.15) | 0.703 | 0.90 (0.45, 1.76) | 0.750 |
B | 27 | 40 | A vs C | 1.05 (0.39, 2.86) | 0.922 | 0.96 (0.34, 2.71) | 0.941 |
C | 8 | 11 | B vs C | 0.93 (0.33, 2.61) | 0.888 | 1.07 (0.37, 3.13) | 0.900 |
Residence | 0.002 | ||||||
Alice Springs | 33 | 20 | AS vs ASC | 4.03 (1.55, 10.47) | 0.004 | ||
Alice Springs camps | 9 | 22 | AS vs R | 3.05 (1.52, 6.13) | 0.002 | ||
Rural | 33 | 61 | AST vs R | 0.76 (0.31, 1.83) | 0.535 | ||
See specialist liver clinic–Yes | 54 | 39 | Yes vs No | 4.22 (2.22, 8.02) | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Raja SS, Batey RG, Edwards S, Aung HH. Standards of liver cirrhosis care in Central Australia. World J Hepatol 2022; 14(3): 559-569
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v14/i3/559.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v14.i3.559