Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Hepatol. Feb 27, 2022; 14(2): 338-353
Published online Feb 27, 2022. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v14.i2.338
Published online Feb 27, 2022. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v14.i2.338
Table 1 Risk of cytomegalovirus disease after liver transplantation
Risk factors | |
CMV serostatus of recipient and donor | D+/R− |
D+/R+ and D−/R+ | |
Viral burden (initial CMV viral load) | High CMV viral load |
Rate of viral load increasing | |
Immunosuppressive agents | Antibody to CD3-receptor: OKT3 or muromonab |
Basiliximab | |
Corticosteroids | |
Mycophenolate mofetil | |
Calcineurin inhibitors: Tacrolimus, sirolimus, and cyclosporine | |
Recipient immunity | TLR2 gene mutation, mutation of mannose-binding lectin |
Upregulation of programmed death-1 receptors | |
Recipient underlying liver disease | Hepatoblastoma with pre-transplant chemotherapy |
Other risk factors | Virus-to-virus interaction (HHV6, HCV, fungal infection), transfusion of non-leucocyte-depleted blood products, volume of blood loss, liver transplantation because of fulminant liver failure, older age, non-white race, female sex, CVVH after liver transplant, septic shock, renal insufficiency |
Table 2 Cytomegalovirus assays and clinical use
Investigation | Sample | Uses | Properties |
Cell culture | |||
Traditional cell culture (human fibroblast cells) | Tissue or non-tissue (blood, urine, oral secretion) sample | Not widely available | Highly specific |
Shell vial assay (centrifugation-amplification technique) | Can be tested for phenotypic susceptibility; Takes a long time (2 to 21 d), more rapid with the shell vial assay (16 h) | ||
Histopathology of organ-specific tissues | |||
Plain histological microscopy | Tissue sample | Gold standard for diagnosis of tissue-invasive CMV disease | Low sensitivity but very high specificity |
Immunohistochemistry | Used for reference of endpoint of treatment of tissue-invasive CMV disease | ||
Molecular diagnosis (detection of viral genome) | |||
Plasma quantitative nucleic acid testing (plasma QNAT) | Blood (plasma or whole blood) | Used to detect CMV DNAemia with high sensitivity; used in diagnosis, surveillance to guide pre-emptive antiviral treatment, and therapeutic monitoring | Generally high sensitivity but less sensitivity in R+ patients |
Tissue QNAT | Tissue sample | Need more clinical trial studies | Better specificity but a lack of studies |
Real-time PCR | Blood | Alternative to conventional plasma QNAT | More rapid and precise |
NASBA assay | Blood | Under study as an alternative to conventional quantitative antigenaemia as a guide for starting pre-emptive therapy | Increased sensitivity for detection of CMV viraemia |
Direct viral pp65 antigen detection | Whole blood or plasma | Diagnosis of CMV infection by detecting antigenaemia; Quantitative result, can guide initiation of pre-emptive therapy | After the blood collection, the sample must be processed within 6 h; False-negatives in patients with neutropenia |
Serological analysis (viral antibody detection) | |||
CMV IgG antibody testing | Plasma | Diagnosis of CMV infection | Better sensitivity and specificity; also positive in past infection |
CMV IgM antibody testing | Pre-transplant assessment for serostatus of the donor and the recipient | Low sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis | |
Viral cellular response detection | |||
QuantiFERON-CMV assay: IFN-γ released measurement | Plasma | Prognostic marker for risk of developing CMV disease: a positive result is associated with a lower incidenceMonitoring during prophylaxis or pre-emptive therapy | High positive predictive value but low negative value |
Table 3 Uses of available cytomegalovirus assays
Use | Assay |
Diagnosis | CMV viral load by plasma QNAT; CMV viral load by real-time PCR assay; pp65 antigen testing; CMV IgG/IgM antibodies |
Diagnosis of tissue-invasive CMV disease | Histopathology |
Pre-transplant risk stratification | CMV IgG/IgM antibodies |
Threshold for initiation of pre-emptive therapy | CMV viral load by plasma QNAT; Quantitative pp65 antigen measurement; NASBA assay |
Monitoring or endpoint (prophylaxis, pre-emptive or treatment) | CMV viral load by plasma QNAT; QuantiFERON-CMV assay |
Endpoint of treatment of tissue-invasive CMV disease | Histopathology |
Prediction of developing CMV disease | QuantiFERON-CMV assay |
Table 4 Summary of pre-emptive, prophylaxis and treatment of cytomegalovirus disease in post-liver transplant patients
Condition | Pre-emptive | Prophylaxis | Treatment | |
Monitoring and endpoint | Monitoring: Weekly or every 2 wk CBC, BUN, Cr, AST, and ALT for first month and then monthly; Monthly CMV QNAT for 12 mo. Endpoint: CMV QNAT for VL negative for two samples 2 wk apart | Monitoring: Weekly CMV QNAT. Endpoint: CMV QNAT for VL negative for two samples 2 wk apart | Monitoring: Weekly CBC, BUN, Cr; Weekly CMV QNAT. Endpoint: CMV syndrome: Clinical resolution; VL less than 200 IU/mL on 1-2 consecutive weeks; Tissue-invasive CMV disease: Clinical resolution; Histologic evidence | |
Cut-off for start medication | Reference | Verma et al[8,14]; Saitoh et al[13]; Martín-Gandul et al[77]; Atabani et al[58]; Griffiths et al[78] | - | Kotton et al[55] |
Values | Non-specific: VL 500 copies/mL; VL 650 copies/mL; pp65 Ag 5 per 50000 leucocytes. D+/R-: Plasma VL 1500 IU/mL. D+/R- and R+: Plasma VL 2275 IU/mL or 2500 copies/mL; Whole blood VL 2520 or 3000 copies/mL. R+: VL 3983 IU/mL | None (risk donor/recipient pair-based) | VL > 200 IU/mL for 2 consecutive weeks | |
Duration | Reference | Razonable et al[32,38;71]; Razonable[39]; Razonable and Humar[51]; Razonable and Hayden[56]; Razonable[79]; Pappo et al[72]; Ueno et al[73]; Kotton et al[55] | Kotton et al[55] | Kotton et al[55] |
Values | Non-specific: 14 d to 3 mo; Extended to 6 mo; Extended to 12 mo. High risk: 6 mo. Intermediate risk: 3 mo. Low risk (D-/R-): Clinical follow-up | D+/R-: 3-6 mo. Others: 3-4 mo or 2-4 wk with CMV surveillance | At least 2 wk | |
Drug/dose/route | First-line: Ganciclovir (5 mg/kg IV q 24 h); Valganciclovir (< 15 kg: 15 mg/kg/dose po once daily; > 15 kg: 500 mg/m2/dose po once daily); Maximum dose: 900 mg/dose once daily; Combined ganciclovir then valganciclovir | First-line: Ganciclovir (same dose as pre-emptive); Valganciclovir (same dose as pre-emptive) | First-line: Ganciclovir [5 mg/kg IV q 12 h (+/- with dose adjustment for renal function)]. Second-line (ganciclovir-induced leucopenia): Foscarnet [60 mg/kg IV q 8 h or 90 mg/kg IV q 12 h (+/- with dose adjustment for renal function)]; Cidofovir [5 mg/kg once weekly × 2 doses then every 2 wk (+/- with dose adjustment for renal function)]. For ganciclovir-resistant [Ganciclovir: 7.5-10 mg/kg IV q 12 h (+/- with dose adjustment for renal function). Add or switch to Foscarnet. Switch to Cidofovir |
- Citation: Onpoaree N, Sanpavat A, Sintusek P. Cytomegalovirus infection in liver-transplanted children. World J Hepatol 2022; 14(2): 338-353
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v14/i2/338.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v14.i2.338