Reine PK, Feier F, da Fonseca EA, Hernandes RG, Seda-Neto J. Quality of life, depression and anxiety in potential living liver donors for pediatric recipients: A retrospective single center experience. World J Hepatol 2022; 14(10): 1899-1906 [PMID: 36340749 DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v14.i10.1899]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Joao Seda-Neto, PhD, Surgeon, Department of Liver Transplantation, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Rua Adma Jafet, 91, São Paulo 01308901, Brazil. joaoseda@gmail.com
Research Domain of This Article
Psychology
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Cohort Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Hepatol. Oct 27, 2022; 14(10): 1899-1906 Published online Oct 27, 2022. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v14.i10.1899
Table 1 Demographic characteristics of the potential living liver donors
Characteristics
n = 250
Sex, female, n (%)
136 (54.4)
Age, yr, mean ± SD
29.2 ± 7.2
Race (n = 246)
Afrodescendent
122 (49.6)
White
116 (47.2)
Other
8 (3.2)
Educational level (n = 246), n (%)
Post-bac/graduate
61 (24.8)
College/bachelor
132 (53.7)
Basic education or less
53 (21.5)
Employment, n (%)
120 (48.8)
Religion, n (%)
Catholic
127 (51.6)
Evangelic
68 (27.6)
Protestant
17 (6.9)
Other
27 (10.9)
None
7 (3)
Marital status, married (n = 250), n (%)
115 (46.0)
Income (n = 246), n (%)
≤ 2 times the minimum wage
140 (57)
2-6 times the minimum wage
91 (37)
≥ 6 times the minimum wage
15 (6)
Family related (n = 250), n (%)
214 (85.6)
Parents, n (%)
183 (73.2)
Table 2 Donor relationship with the recipient
Donor relationship with the recipient
n = 247 (%)
Mother/father
158 (64)
Uncle/aunt
30 (12.2)
Brother/sister
10 (4)
Cousin
9 (3.6)
Grandfather/grandmother
4 (1.6)
Nephew/niece
3 (1.2)
Unrelated
33 (13.4)
Table 3 Reasons for not completing the donation process
Reasons for not completing the donation process
n = 110 (%)
Medical condition
44 (40)
Abandoned the evaluation
22 (20)
Children died before the transplant
6 (5.4)
Social contraindication
1 (0.9)
Transplant was postponed
1 (0.9)
Unknown/missing
36 (32.8)
Table 4 Motivations and ambivalence in potential living liver donor
Motivations and ambivalence
n = 250 (%)
Would prefer that other person donates
25 (10)
Would feel relieved if the recipient was transplanted with a deceased donor
115 (46)
Feels moved about the possibility to donate
59 (23.6)
Wouldn’t like to be a donor, would rather care for the recipient after the transplant
11 (4.4)
Voluntary and pro-active decision to donate
195 (78)
Immediate decision to donate
183 (73.2)
Never had doubts about donating
218 (87.2)
Is scared of the surgery
5 (2)
Has a family member who's against the donation
10 (4)
Believes there will be no health-related problems after the donation
241 (96.4)
Would be sad if not compatible to donate
144 (57.6)
Wishes to donate in order to ease the recipient’s and the family suffering
152 (60.8)
Believes the donation will be a life changer
210 (84)
Citation: Reine PK, Feier F, da Fonseca EA, Hernandes RG, Seda-Neto J. Quality of life, depression and anxiety in potential living liver donors for pediatric recipients: A retrospective single center experience. World J Hepatol 2022; 14(10): 1899-1906