Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Hepatol. Oct 27, 2021; 13(10): 1215-1233
Published online Oct 27, 2021. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v13.i10.1215
Published online Oct 27, 2021. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v13.i10.1215
Term | Definition(s) |
Liver disorder | Serum ALT or AST > 2 × ULN, TB > 2 × ULN, ALP ≥ 2 ULN[75] |
Liver injury or acute liver injury | ALT and/or AST above 3 × ULN, ALP, GGT, and/or TB above 2 × ULN[9,34] |
ALT and/or AST ≥ 2 × ULN, with TB ≥ 2 × ULN and/or INR ≥ 1.7[70] | |
ALT levels above 3 × the ULN[28] | |
Mild liver injury | ALT above the ULN and below 2 × the ULN[25] |
Moderate liver injury | ALT between 2-5 × the ULN[25] |
Severe liver injury | ALT above 5 × the ULN[25] |
Any elevation of enzymes above 3 × the ULN and bilirubin above 2 × the ULN[5] | |
Liver test abnormalities | Elevation of the following serum liver enzymes: ALT > 40 U/L, AST > 40 U/L, GGT > 49 U/L, ALP > 135 U/L, and TB > 17.1 μmol/L[34] |
De novo LFTs abnormality | The occurrence of abnormal LFTs in patients with normal LFTs at admission[27] |
LFTs elevation | Increase in serum liver enzyme levels above the ULN[27,28] |
Mild LFTs elevations | Elevation 1-2 times above the ULN[25,34] |
Hepatocellular or hepatocyte type | The pattern of abnormal LFTs with predominantly elevated ALT and AST[27] |
Patients with raised ALT and/or AST more than 3 × the ULN[34] | |
AST/ALT activity is higher than the ALP/GGT activity, with liver enzyme activities calculated by multiples of their ULN[34] | |
Cholestatic or cholangiocyte type | Pattern of abnormal LFTs with predominantly elevated ALP and GGT[27] |
Patients with raised ALP or GGT 2 × the ULN[34] | |
ALP/GGT activity was higher than the AST/ALT activity, with the liver enzyme activities calculated by multiples of their ULN[34] | |
Mixed type | Mixed pattern when the extents of AST/ALT and ALP/GGT are similar[27] |
A combination of both ALT/AST elevated more than 3 × the ULN and ALP/GGT twice the ULN[34] | |
Drug-induced liver injury | Any elevation in liver enzymes or TB after the initiation of the drug in the absence of identified common causes of liver disease[5] |
Ref. | N (all) n (non-survivors) | Age (year) | Male | Pre-existing CLD | Type of liver disease | Elevated LFTs on admission (%) | LFTs levels on admission. ALT/AST/ALP/GGT (U/L)/TB (μmoL) | Selected complications or clinical outcomes |
Cao et al[51]. China | N = 102 (n = 17) | 53 vs 72 | 47.1% vs 76.5% | 2.4% vs 5.9% | - | ALT: NR vs 41.1% | ALT: NR vs 40 | ALI: 24.7% vs 76.5%; ARDS: 5.9% vs 88.2%; Shock: 3.5% vs 41.1%; MV: 2.4% vs 70.6% |
Chen et al[52]. China | N = 274 (n = 113) | 51 vs 68 | 55% vs 73% | - | HBV surface antigen positivity | ALT: 19% vs 27%; AST: 16% vs 52% | ALT: 20 vs 28; AST: 25 vs 45; ALP: 64 vs 76; GGT: 28 vs 42; TB: 8.4 vs 12.6 | ALI: 2% vs 9%; ARDS: 52% vs 100%; Shock: 0% vs 41%; MV: 82% vs 16% |
Chen et al[53]. China | N = 55 (n = 19)1 | 72 vs 77 | 50% vs 84.2% | 2.8% vs 5.3% | - | ALT: 19.4% vs 31.6%; AST: 50% vs 73.7% | ALT: 40 vs 44;AST: 55 vs 78 | MV: 30.6% vs 68.4% |
Du et al[54]. China | N = 852 | 65.8 | 72.9% | 5.9% | - | ALT: 16.5%; AST: 32.9%; TB: 35.3% | ALT: 72.9; AST: 94.4; TB: 18.4 | ALI: 35.3%; ARDS: 74.1%; Shock: 81.2%; MV: 93%3 |
Wu et al[42]. China | N = 84 (n = 44)4 | 50 vs 68.5 | 77.5% vs 65.9% | 3.5%5 | - | - | ALT: 35 vs 39; AST: 38.5 vs 37; TB: 11.6 vs 14.5 | MV: 57.5% vs 97.8%3; Others reported as association |
Yang et al[55]. China | N = 922 | 69.8 | 53.3% | 3.3% | - | - | ALT: 27; AST: 31; TB: 13.6 | ALI: 16.5%; ARDS: 80.2%; MODS: 15.4% |
Yang et al[39]. China | N = 52 (n = 32) | 51.9 vs 64.6 | 70% vs 66% | - | - | - | TB: 13.1 vs 19.5 | ALI: 30% vs 28%; ARDS: 45% vs 81%; MV: 35% vs 94% |
Zhang et al[44]. China | N = 822 | 72.5 | 65.9% | 2.4% | - | ALT: 30.6%; AST: 61.1%; TB: 30.6% | ALT: 26; AST: 72; TB: 13.6 | Hepatic damage: 78%; Liver-associated death: 1.2%; MV: 40.2% |
Zhou et al[43]. China | N = 191 (n = 54) | 52 vs 69 | 59% vs 70% | - | - | ALT: 24% vs 48% | ALT: 27 vs 40 | ARDS: 7% vs 93%; Shock: 0% vs 70%; MV: 2% vs 100%3 |
Ref. | N (all), n (severe disease). Patient population | Age (year) | Male | Pre-existing CLD | Type of pre-existing CLD | Elevated LFTs on admission (%) | LFTs levels on admission. ALT/AST/ALP/GGT (U/L)/TB (μmoL) | Selected complications or clinical outcomes |
Arentz et al[56]. United States | N = 21. Critically ill | 70 | 52% | 4.8% | Cirrhosis | - | ALT: 108; AST: 273; ALP: 80; TB: 0.6 mg/dL | ALI: 14.3%; Severe ARDS: 57.1%; MV:71%; Death: 52.4% |
Cai et al[34]. China | N = 318 (n = 85)1. Non-severe vs severe | 47. All patients | 47.5%. All patients | 5%. All patients | ALD, NAFLD, HVB | ALT: 6.4% vs 21.1%; AST: 0.68% vs 18.8%; GGT: 5.1% vs 29.4%; TB: 1.2% vs 7% | - | MOF: 0% vs 11.7% |
Cai et al[9]. China | N = 298 (n = 58). Non-severe vs severe | 41 vs 62.5 | 44.1% vs 67.2% | 8.3% vs 13.7% | NAFLD: 3.3% vs 10.3%; ALD: 3.3% vs 1.7%; HBV: 1.7% vs 1.7% | - | ALT: 20 vs 26.8; AST: 26 vs 36; ALP: 61 vs 58; GGT: 21 vs 35.2; TB: 10.9 vs 11.2 | ALI: 9.6% vs 36.2%; Discharge: 93.3% vs 75.9%; Hospital-stay: 19 d vs 27 d; Death: 0% vs 5.2% |
Du et al[57]. China | N = 109. Non-ICU vs ICU | 72.7 vs 68.4 | 65.5% vs 70.6% | 3.4% vs 0% | - | ALT: 13.8% vs 19.6%; AST: 49% vs 43.1% | ALT: 21.6 vs 27; AST: 32 vs 40 | Invasive MV: 0% vs 64.7%; Hospital-stay: 12.5 d vs 15.9 d |
Guan et al[40]. China | N = 1099 (n = 173). Non-severe vs severe | 45 vs 52 | 58.2% vs 57.8% | 2.4% vs 0.6% | HBV | ALT: 19.8% vs 28.1%; AST: 18.2% vs 39.4%; TB: 9.9% vs 13.3% | - | ARDS: 1.1% vs 15.6%; MV: 0% vs 38.7%; Discharge: 5.4% vs 2.9%; Hospital-stay: 11 d vs 13 d; Death: 0.1% vs 8.1% |
Huang et al[2]. China | N = 41 (n = 13). Non-ICU vs ICU | 49 vs 49 | 68% vs 85% | 4% vs 0% | - | AST: 25% vs 62% | ALT: 27 vs 49; AST: 34 vs 44; TB: 10.8 vs 14 | ARDS: 4% vs 85%; Shock: 0% vs 23%; Invasive MV: 0% vs 15%; Discharge: 75% vs 54%; Death: 4% vs 38% |
Lei et al[28]. China | N = 5771 (n = 1186). Non-severe vs severe | 55 vs 59 | 45.1% vs 55.3% | 1.2% vs 2.1% | Viral hepatitis Cirrhosis | - | ALT: 23 vs 26; AST: 22 vs 31; ALP: 65 vs 63; TB: 10.3 vs 10.6 | Reported as association not absolute values |
Li et al[58]. China | N = 548 (n = 269). Non-severe vs severe | 56 vs 65 | 45.2% vs 56.9% | 1.1% vs 0.7% | HBV | ALT: 22.3% vs 24.1%; AST: 23.3% vs 43.4%; TB: 2.3% vs 6.4% | - | ALI: 15.8% vs 23%; ARDS: 9.7% vs 68%; MV: 4% vs 34.2%2; Discharge: 72.9% vs 31.7%; Death: 1.1% vs 32.5% |
Mo et al[59]. China | N = 155 (n = 85)3. General vs refractory | 47 vs 61 | 44.3% vs 64.7% | 2.9% vs 5.9% | - | - | ALT: 20 vs 28; AST: 32 vs 37 | Critical case: 4.3% vs 40%; MV: 0% vs 41.2%; Others reported as association |
Wan et al[60]. China | N = 135 (n =40). Mild vs severe | 44 vs 56 | 54.7% vs 52.5% | 1% vs 2.5% | - | AST: 16% vs 37.5% | ALT: 21.7 vs 26.6; AST: 22.4 vs 33.6; TB: 8.6 vs 9.8 | ARDS: 1.1% vs 50%; Shock: 0% vs 2.5%; Discharge: 10.5% vs 12.5%; Death: 0% vs 2.5% |
Wang et al[1]. China | N = 138 (n = 36). Non-ICU vs ICU | 51 vs 66 | 52% vs 61.1% | 3.9% vs 0% | - | - | ALT: 23 vs 35; AST: 29 vs 52; TB: 9.3 vs 11.5 | ARDS: 4.9% vs 61.1%; Shock: 1% vs 30.6%; Invasive MV: 0% vs 47.2% |
Wu et al[42]. China | N = 201 (n = 84)4. Non-ARDS vs ARDS | 48 vs 58.5 | 58.1% vs 71.4% | 3.5%5 | - | - | ALT: 27 vs 35; AST: 30 vs 38; TB: 10.5 vs 12.9 | MV: 0% vs 78.6%2; Others reported as association |
Zhang et al[61]. China | N = 221 (n = 55). Non-severe vs severe | 51 vs 62 | 44% vs 63.6% | 1.8% vs 7.3% | - | - | ALT: 22 vs 32; AST: 27 vs 51; TB: 9.6 vs 11.4 | ARDS: 0% vs 87.3%; Shock: 0% vs 27.3%; MV: 1.2% vs 74.6%2; Discharge: 21.1% vs 12.7%; Death: 0% vs 21.8% |
Zhang et al[62]. China | N = 140 (n = 58). Non-severe vs severe | 51.1 vs 64 | 46.3% vs 56.9% | 5% vs 6.9% | Fatty liver and abnormal liver function | - | - | - |
Zheng et al[63]. China | N = 161 (n = 30). Non-severe vs severe | 40 vs 57 | 50.4% vs 46.7% | 3.1% vs 0% | - | ALT: 6.1% vs 16.7%; AST: 7.6% vs 40%; TB: 4.6% vs 10% | ALT: 19.3 vs 23.9; AST: 23.4 vs 31.6; TB: 10.7 vs 12.7 | - |
Medication (class) | Pattern of liver injury | Evidence |
Corticosteroids (Anti-inflammatory agent) | Acute liver injury[77] | Multicenter cohort study (n = 774); COVID-19 with ARDS: Incidence of ALI versus control (18.3% vs 9.9%; P = 0.001)[77] |
Meta-analysis; critically ill COVID-19 patients: No association with serious adverse effects[78] | ||
RECOVERY trial: No reported serious ADRs or DILI[79] | ||
Favipiravir (RdRp inhibitor) | Abnormal LFTs[80] | RCT (n = 150); mild-to-moderate COVID-19: Abnormal LFTs versus control 6.8% vs 2.7%)[80] |
Elevation of transaminases levels[81] | RCT; moderate COVID-19: Elevated ALT and AST were reported[81] | |
Hydroxychloroquine (Antimalarial agent) | Liver toxicity is not common[82]. Elevation of transaminases levels[74,75,82-84] | Retrospective study (n = 153): Elevation in AST (11%) and ALT (9%)[82] |
RCT (n = 504); mild-to-moderate COVID-19: Elevation in ALT or AST elevation 10.6% in HCQ plus azithromycin, 9% in HCQ, and 3.5% in control arm (P = 0.008)[83] | ||
Systematic review: Elevations of LFTs was transient[84] | ||
Recovery trial: No reported DILI[85] | ||
Interferon | - | Data on safety in COVID-19 patients is scarce |
Lopinavir/ritonavir (Protease inhibitor) | Rise in liver function parameters[5,27,34,74,86] | RCT (n = 199): Elevated AST versus control (2.1% vs 5.1%), elevated ALT (1.1% vs 1 %), elevated TB (3.2% vs 3 %)[86] |
Hyperbilirubinemia[5,34] | Meta-analysis: DILI in 37.2% of patients (as hyperbilirubinemia followed by elevation of transaminases)[5] | |
Remdesivir (RdRp inhibitor) | Not well established. Elevation of transaminases levels[5,75,87-89]. Elevation of TB levels[88]. Hypoalbuminemia[88] | Case series: Elevated aminotransferases in 23 % discontinuation in 4% of patients[87] |
RCT (n = 237) in severe COVID-19: Elevated TB versus placebo (10% vs 9%) and AST (5% vs 12%), hypoalbuminemia (13% vs 15%). Discontinuation in 1% of patients[88] | ||
Open-label, phase 3 trial: Elevated ALT (5%-6%) and AST (7%-8%)[89] | ||
Meta-analysis: Pooled incidence of DILI of 15.2%[5] | ||
Meta-analysis: No difference as compared to placebo in liver enzymes elevation[90] | ||
Tocilizumab (Humanized recombinant monoclonal antibody) | Elevation of transaminases levels[27,75,91-94]. Liver injury as early as 24 h with a 40-fold increase in transaminases that normalized in 10 d[91] | Case series; 7 severe COVID-19 patients: Up to 4.5 folds elevated baseline ALT and AST. Transaminases normalized in 3 wk[92] |
Retrospective study (n = 1827): AST > 5 × ULN in 69.1%, and ALT > 5 × ULN in 72.1% of patients[75] | ||
Observational study (n = 104): Minor increase of AST, ALT (P < 0.001) and GGT (P = 0.003; no safety concerns on follow up[93] | ||
RCT (n = 243): ALT elevation versus placebo (5% vs 4.9%), AST elevation in 3.7%[94] | ||
RCT (n = 130); moderate or severe COVID-19: No increase in hepatitis risk[95] |
- Citation: Omar AS, Kaddoura R, Orabi B, Hanoura S. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on liver, liver diseases, and liver transplantation programs in intensive care units. World J Hepatol 2021; 13(10): 1215-1233
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v13/i10/1215.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v13.i10.1215