Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Hepatol. Dec 27, 2020; 12(12): 1326-1340
Published online Dec 27, 2020. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v12.i12.1326
Published online Dec 27, 2020. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v12.i12.1326
Table 1 Characteristics of the patients with no subclinical proximal tubulopathy at on day 0
Variables | Global (n = 138); n (%) ou; median (Q1; Q3); (n) (min-max) | ETV (n = 28); n (%) ou; median (Q1; Q3) (n) (min-max) | Naive (n = 84); n (%) ou; median (Q1; Q3) (n) (min-max) | TDF (n = 26); n (%) ou; median (Q1; Q3) (n) (min-max) | P value; ETV vs naive | P value; TDF vs naive | |
Male | 72 (52.2%) | 19 (67.9%) | 39 (46.4%) | 14 (53.8%) | 0.051 | 0.511 | |
Age in yr | 37.5 (29; 47); (n = 138); (18-74) | 45.5 (31; 57.5); (n = 28); (18-66) | 36.5 (29; 45); (n = 84); (18-74) | 35.5 (24; 42) (n = 26); (21-56) | 0.082 | 0.222 | |
BMI in kg/m2 | 24.5 (21.3; 27.8); (n = 115); (16.6-38.8) | 25 (22.2; 29); (n = 24); (16.6-36.3) | 24.8 (21.7; 28.7); (n = 71); (17.8-38.8) | 21.8 (19; 26.5); (n = 20); (18-35.2) | 0.912 | 0.022 | |
Ethnicity | |||||||
-African | 65 (47.1%) | 7 (25.0%) | 44 (52.4%) | 14 (53.8%) | 0.0033 | 0.053 | |
-Asian | 16 (11.6%) | 7 (25.0%) | 4 (4.8%) | 5 (19.2%) | |||
-White | 57 (41.3%) | 14 (50.0%) | 36 (42.9%) | 7 (26.9%) | |||
Phases of infection | |||||||
-HbeAg + chronic infection | 6 (4.3%) | 3 (10.7%) | 3 (3.6%) | 0 (0.0%) | < 0.00013 | < 0.00013 | |
-HbeAg + chronic hepatitis | 15 (10.9%) | 6 (21.4%) | 3 (3.6%) | 6 (23.1%) | |||
-HbeAg-chronic infection | 60 (43.5%) | 1 (3.6%) | 57 (67.9%) | 2 (7.7%) | |||
-HbeAg-chronic hepatitis | 57 (41.3%) | 18 (64.3%) | 21 (25.0%) | 18 (69.2%) | |||
Diabetes | 9 (6.5%) | 5 (17.9%) | 4 (4.8%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0.043 | 0.573 | |
High blood pressure | 25 (18.1%) | 9 (32.1%) | 12 (14.3%) | 4 (15.4%) | 0.041 | 1.003 | |
Renal insufficiency | 1 (0.7%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (1.2%) | 0 (0%) | 1.003 | 1.003 | |
Viral load | |||||||
-PCR < 2000 UI/mL | 69 (61.6%) | 3 (15.8%) | 60 (77.9%) | 6 (37.5%) | < 0.00013 | < 0.00013 | |
-PCR ≥ 2000 et < 20000 UI/mL | 22 (19.6%) | 6 (31.6%) | 16 (20.8%) | 0 (0%) | |||
-PCR ≥ 20000 UI/mL and < 7 (log) | 13 (11.6%) | 6 (31.6%) | 1 (1.3%) | 6 (37.5%) | |||
PCR > 7 (log) | 8 (7.1%) | 4 (21.1%) | 0 (0%) | 4 (2.5%) | < 0.00012 | < 0.00013 | |
ALAT UI/L | 25 (17; 36); (n = 133); (7-214) | 40 (25; 57); (n = 27); (17-148) | 19 (15; 26); (n = 83); (7-89) | 46 (28; 70); (n = 23); (10-214) | |||
Fibrosis4 | |||||||
-F0/F15 | 103 (84.4%) | 13 (56.5%) | 73 (94.8%) | 17 (77.3%) | < 0.00013 | 0.00673 | |
-F2 | 5 (4.1%) | 2 (8.7%) | 2 (2.6%) | 1 (4.5%) | |||
-F2/F3 | 8 (6.6%) | 6 (26.1%) | 2 (2.6%) | 0 (0%) | |||
-F3 | 1 (0.8%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (4.5%) | |||
-F3/F4 | |||||||
-F4 | 5 (4.1%) | 2 (8.7%) | 0 (0%) | 3 (13.6%) | |||
Fibrosis F0/F1 vs F2 | |||||||
-F0/F1 | 103 (84.4%) | 13 (56.5%) | 73 (94.8%) | 17 (77.3%) | < 0.00013 | 0.023 | |
-≥ F2 | 19 (15.6%) | 10 (43.5%) | 4 (5.2%) | 5 (22.7%) | |||
Previous HBV therapy | 14 (10.1%) | 5 (17.9%) | 0 (0.0%) | 9 (34.6%) | 0.00073 | < 0.00013 | |
Nephrotoxic drugs | 12 (6.1%) | 4 (10.5%) | 6 (5.2%) | 2 (4.8%) | 0.223 | 1.003 |
Table 2 Clinical characteristics of the patients with no subclinical proximal tubulopathy at on day 0
Global population (n = 138); median (Q1; Q3); ( | ETV group; (n = 28); median (Q1; Q3); (n) (min-max) | Naive group; (n = 84); median (Q1; Q3); (n) (min-max) | TDF group; (n = 26); median (Q1; Q3); (n) (min-max) | P value; ETV vs naive | P value; TDF vs naive | |
Phosphatemia, mmoL/L | 1.1 (1.0; 1.2); (n = 135); (0.6-1.4) | 1.1 (1.0; 1.1); (n = 26); (0.9-1.3) | 1.0 (1.0; 1.2); (n = 83); (0.7-1.4) | 1.0 (0.9; 1.2); (n = 26); (0.6-1.2) | 0.401 | 0.981 |
Plasma creatinine, μmoL/L | 73 (58; 85); (n = 137); (37.5-114.9) | 78.4 (66; 84); (n = 28); (51-114.9) | 71 (58; 87); (n = 83); (37.5-113) | 76.9 (57.5; 87); (n = 26); (38-98) | 0.232 | 0.772 |
eGFR (MDRD), mL/min/1.73 m² | 94.5 (82.6; 107.6); (n = 137); (58.6-169.1) | 91 (84.2; 101); (n = 28); (62.7-141.3) | 94.8 (80.7; 108.1); (n = 83); (58.6-151.1) | 95.4 (84.3; 108.4); (n = 26); (70.2-169.1) | 0.372 | 0.652 |
25(OH)D3, ng/mL | 15.9 (9.9; 22.2); (n = 130); (3.1-55.2) | 16.8 (12.6; 24.8); (n = 26) (5-55.2) | 14.8 (9.4; 21); (n = 81); (4-42.1) | 15.3 (9.8; 22.7); (n = 23); (3.1-36.9) | 0.272 | 0.952 |
TmPi/eGFR, mmoL/L | 1 (0.9; 1.1); (n = 181); (0.4-1.9) | 1 (0.9; 1.2); (n = 34); (0.7-1.8) | 1 (0.9; 1.1); (n = 111); (0.4-1.9) | 1 (0.8; 1.2); (n = 36); (0.6-1.5) | 0.242 | 0.862 |
FEUA, % | 5.8 (4.5; 7.1); (n = 112); (2.2-9.7) | 5.9 (4.7; 7.5); (n = 23); (2.7-9.1) | 5.8 (4.4; 7); (n = 69); (2.2-9.3) | 5.5 (4.5; 6.7); (n = 20); (3.8-9.7) | 0.641 | 0.951 |
Table 3 Subclinical proximal tubulopathy prevalence at month 24 in the entecavir, naive and tenofovir disoproxil groups
Global (n = 138); n (%); (95%CI) | ETV (n = 28); n (%); (95%CI) | Naive (n = 84); n (%); (95%CI) | TDF (n = 26); n (%); (95%CI) | P value; ETV vs naive | P value; TDF vs naive | ||
Missing values | 45 | 9 | 22 | 14 | |||
SPT prevalence at M24; (n = 93) | 29 (31.2%); (22.0-41.6) | 4 (21.1%); (6.1-45.6) | 19 (30.7%); (19.6-43.7) | 6 (50.00%); (21.1-78.9) | 0.421 | 0.322 |
Table 4 Potential confounding factors at baseline susceptible to influence the prevalence of subclinical proximal tubulopathy at month 24 between the different groups in univariate analysis
HR (95%CI) | P value | Global P value | ||
Fibrosis | ≥ F2 vs F0/F1 | 1.09 (0.32-3.67) | 0.89 | 0.89 |
Group | ETV vs naive | 0.41 (0.09-1.83) | 0.24 | 0.043 |
TDF vs naive | 2.28 (0.98-5.30) | 0.05 | ||
Sex | Female vs male | 0.85 (0.38-1.87) | 0.68 | 0.68 |
Ethnicity | African vs White | 0.91 (0.41-2.04) | 0.83 | 0.63 |
Asian vs White | 0.36 (0.05-2.84) | 0.33 | ||
Diabetes | Yes vs no | 0.63 (0.08-4.67) | 0.65 | 0.65 |
Previous hypertension | Yes vs no | 1.26 (0.50-3.17) | 0.63 | 0.63 |
Viral load | Low vs very low | 0.94 (0.30-2.89) | 0.91 | 0.46 |
Elevated vs very low | 2.38 (0.77-7.34) | 0.13 | ||
Very elevated vs very low | 1.40 (0.40-4.93) | 0.60 | ||
Previous HBV therapy | Yes vs no | 1.11 (0.33-3.74) | 0.86 | 0.86 |
Age at inclusion | 1.02 (0.98-1.05) | 0.35 | ||
BMI at inclusion | 0.98 (0.89-1.08) | 0.67 | ||
ALAT at inclusion | 1.00 (0.99-1.01) | 0.67 |
- Citation: Brayette A, Essig M, Carrier P, Debette-Gratien M, Labrunie A, Alain S, Maynard M, Ganne-Carrié N, Nguyen-Khac E, Pinet P, De Ledinghen V, Renou C, Mathurin P, Vanlemmens C, Di Martino V, Gervais A, Foucher J, Isabelle FH, Vergniol J, Hourmand-Ollivier I, Cohen D, Duval X, Poynard T, Bardou M, Abergel A, Dao MT, Thévenot T, Hiriart JB, Canva V, Lassailly G, Aurières C, Boyer N, Thabut D, Bernard PH, Schnee M, Larrey D, Hanslik B, Hommel S, Jacques J, Loustaud-Ratti V. Subclinical proximal tubulopathy in hepatitis B: The roles of nucleot(s)ide analogue treatment and the hepatitis B virus. World J Hepatol 2020; 12(12): 1326-1340
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v12/i12/1326.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v12.i12.1326