Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Hepatol. Dec 27, 2020; 12(12): 1136-1147
Published online Dec 27, 2020. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v12.i12.1136
Published online Dec 27, 2020. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v12.i12.1136
Table 1 Synthesis of a selection of the studies published on spontaneous bacterial peritonitis due to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae producing pathogens
Ref. | Total number SBP/CRE SBP | CRE | CRE N-SBP/Total SBP | Not-N-SBP/Total SBP |
Piano et al[14], 2012 | 1/1 | K. pneumoniae | 1/1 | 0/1 |
Li et al[27], 2015 | 31/6 | K. pneumoniae, E. coli | 2/4, 2/2 | 2/4, 0/2 |
Alexopoulou et al[28], 2016 | 130/6 | K. pneumoniae, E. coli | 5/5, 1/1 | 0/5, 0/1 |
Lutz et al[29], 2016 | 92/3 | E. faecium | 3/3 | 0/3 |
Tudorascu et al[30], 2016 | 64/3 | K. pneumoniae, E. coli, Enterobacter | 1/1, 1/1, 1/1 | 0/1, 0/1, 0/1 |
Salerno et al[31], 2016 | 56/8 | K. pneumoniae, E. coli | 5/7, 0/1 | 7/2, 1/1 |
Béjar-Serrano et al[32], 2019 | 22/1 | E. cloacae | 1/1 | 0/1 |
Table 2 Class A carbapenemase asset found in each pathogen
Pathogens | Class A carbapenemase | |||||||||
KPC-1 | KPC-2 | KPC-3 | GES-4 | GES-5 | GES-6 | SME-1 | SME-2 | SME-3 | NMC-A | |
K. pneumoniae | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||||
S. marcescens | + | + | + | |||||||
E. coli | + | |||||||||
E. cloacae | + | + |
Table 3 Class B carbapenemase asset found in each pathogen
Pathogens | Class B carbapenemase | |||||||||
IMP-1 | IMP-1-like | IMP-4 | IMP-8 | VIM-1 | VIM-1-like | VIM-2 | VIM-2-like | VIM-4 | VIM-5 | |
K. pneumoniae | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |||
S. marcescens | + | + | + | + | ||||||
E. coli | + | + | + | |||||||
E. cloacae | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||
C. freundii | + | + | + |
Table 4 Class D carbapenemase asset found in each pathogen
Pathogens | Class D carbapenemase | |||
OXA-48 | OXA-163 | OXA-181 | OXA-244 | |
K. pneumoniae | + | + | + | |
S. marcescens | + | |||
E. coli | + | + | + | |
E. cloacae | + |
Table 5 Advantages and disadvantages of the antimicrobials used to treat spontaneous bacterial peritonitis due to gram-negative bacteria producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae
Antimicrobial agent | Advantages | Disadvantages | Ref. |
Aminoglycosides (i.e. Plazomicin) | Good activity against GNB producing ESβL, KPC, AmpC but not MβL enzymes | Heterogeneous susceptibility high dose (toxicity) | [49] |
Polimixins (i.e. Colistin) | Low resistance emergence | Low efficacy for Klebsiella spp. producing KPC enzymes | [56] |
Fosfomicyn | Moderate activity against MDR–CRE | Rapid emergence of antibiotic resistance | [59] |
Glycylcycline (i.e. Tigecycline) | Good activity against MDR–CRE | High dose (toxicity) | [62] |
Fluorocycline (i.e. Eravacycline) | Broad spectrum activity (even if MDR and XDR pathogens). Active against the most common tetracycline-resistance mechanisms. High oral bioavailability. Safety and tolerability | Not active on Pseudomonas spp. and Burkholderia spp. | [63- 65] |
β-lactams/β-lactamase inhibitors (i.e. ceftazidime/avibactam) | Good activity against GNB producing ESβL, KPC, AmpC, OXA-48 and MβL. Safety and tolerability | Frequent emergence of antibiotic resistance | [67] |
Carbapenem/β-lactamase inhibitors (i.e. meropenem/vaborbactam or Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam) | Good activity against GNB producing ESβL, KPC and AmpC. Outcome improvement | Not active on GNB producing OXA-48 and MβL | [79] |
Monobactam/β-lactamase inhibitor (i.e. aztreonam/avibactam) | Good activity against GNB producing ESβL, KPC, AmpC and OXA-48 | Recently approved | [50- 52] |
Siderophore cephalosporin (i.e. Cefidecol) | Broad spectrum of activity against GNB, including MDR Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and A. baumannii | Recently approved | [50] |
- Citation: Fiore M, Di Franco S, Alfieri A, Passavanti MB, Pace MC, Petrou S, Martora F, Leone S. Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis due to carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae: Etiology and antibiotic treatment. World J Hepatol 2020; 12(12): 1136-1147
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v12/i12/1136.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v12.i12.1136