Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Hepatol. Nov 27, 2020; 12(11): 1115-1127
Published online Nov 27, 2020. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v12.i11.1115
Published online Nov 27, 2020. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v12.i11.1115
Procoagulant factors | Anticoagulant factors | |
Primary haemostasis | Increased vWF | Thrombocytopenia |
Reduced ADAMTS13 | +/- platelet dysfunction | |
Secondary haemostasis/coagulation | High FVIII | Reduced synthesis of FII, FV, FVII, FIX and FXI |
Reduced protein C, protein S and antithrombin | ||
Dysfibrinogenaemia | ||
Low fibrinogen (in end stage disease) | ||
Fibrinolysis | Low plasminogen | Low antiplasmin |
Low TAFI | ||
High PAI-1 | High tPA |
Measurement | TEG | ROTEM | |
Period of initial fibrin formation | Time (min) to reach an amplitude of 2 mm | Reaction time (R) | Clotting time |
Clot kinetics | Time (min) for clot amplitude to increase from 2 mm to 20 mm | Kinetics time (K) | Clot formation time |
Clot kinetics | Angle of tangent line from clot initiation to the slope of the developing curve | Alpha angle (α) | Alpha angle (α) |
Maximum clot strength | Peak amplitude (mm) | Maximum amplitude | Maximum clot firmness |
Clot stability/fibrinolysis | Percent reduction in curve at 30 and 60 minutes | Lysis 30 (LY30) and lysis 60 (LY60) | Lysis index 30 (LI 30) |
Ref. | Year | No. of patients | Method of TEG | TEG thresholds for transfusion | SOC thresholds for transfusion | Outcomes: Blood product usage | Outcomes: Other |
Wang et al[20] | 2010 | 28 | TEG 5000 | FFP titrated to maintain R time < 10 min | FFP titrated to maintain PT and APTT at less than one and a half times control | Statistically significant reduction in FFP use in TEG group (12.8 units in TEG group vs 21.5 units in control group, P < 0.05) | Trend towards reduction in blood loss in the TEG arm (not statistically significant) |
14 TEG | Kaolin activated | ||||||
14 SOC | |||||||
SDAP when MA < 55 mm* | |||||||
5 pooled units of cryoprecipitate when alpha angle < 45 degrees** | Platelets to maintain a platelet count ≥ 50 × 109 | No reduction in RBC, Platelet or cryoprecipitate use | No statistically significant difference in mortality at 3 yr | ||||
Cryoprecipitate to maintain fibrinogen > 1 g/L | |||||||
De Pietri et al[21] | 2016 | 60 | TEG 5000 | FFP, 10 mL/kg*** when R time > 40 min1 | FFP, 10 mL/kg*** when INR > 1.8 | Statistically significant reduction in FFP use in TEG group. (Total amount of FFP transfused in those undergoing a low risk procedure: 4000 mL in TEG group vs 11050 mL in SOC group, P = 0.002) (Total amount of FFP transfused in those undergoing a high-risk procedure: 0 mL in TEG group vs 6500 mL in SOC group) | No statistically significant difference in periprocedural bleeding complications. |
30 TEG | Native blood (no activators) | ||||||
30 SOC | |||||||
SDAP when MA < 30 mm* | SDAP when platelets < 50 × 109* | Statistically significant reduction in platelets transfused. (6.7% required a platelet transfusion in the TEG arm vs 33.3% in the SOC arm, P = 0.021) | Periprocedural bleeding events were rare with only one patient experiencing post procedure bleeding. | ||||
Rout et al[22] | 2019 | 60 | MonoTEM-A® | FFP, 5 mL/kg*** when R time > 15 min | FFP, 5 mL/kg*** when INR > 1.8 | Statistically significant reduction in FFP use. (13.3% receiving FFP in the TEG group vs 46.7% in the SOC group P = 0.010. 1345 ml LFFP transfused in the TEG group vs 4605 mL in the SOC) | No difference in initial control of bleeding |
30 TEG | |||||||
Native (no activators) | |||||||
30 SOC | |||||||
No difference in rates of re-bleeding at 5 d | |||||||
3 pooled units of platelets when MA < 30 mm* | 3 pooled units of platelets when platelet count < 50 × 109* | ||||||
Statistically significant reduction in rebleeding at 42 d (10% in the TEG group vs 36.7% in SOC, P = 0.012) | |||||||
Statistically significant reduction in platelets transfused (10% in TEG group vs 70% SOC group P < 0.001. Total vol. of platelets transfused: 450 mL platelets in the TEG group vs 3450 mL in the SOC) | |||||||
No difference in mortality at 6 wk (13.3% in TEG group vs 26.7% in SOC, P = 0.176) | |||||||
No difference in RBC transfusion | |||||||
Kumar et al[23] | 2019 | 96 | TEG 5000 | FFP, 10 mL/kg*** when R time > 10 min | FFP, 10 mL/kg*** if INR > 1.8 | Statistically significant reduction in FFP use (Total FFP transfused 440 mL in TEG vs 880 mL in SOC, P < 0.01) | Statistically significant reduction in transfusion related adverse events (30.6% in TEG group vs 74.5% in SOC P < 0.01)2 |
49 TEG | Kaolin activated | ||||||
47 SOC | |||||||
SDAP when MA < 55 mm* | SDAP when platelets < 50 × 109* | Statistically significant reduction in platelets transfused (Average of 1 SDAP unit per patient in TEG group vs 2 SDAP units in SOC, P < 0.01) | |||||
5 pooled units of cryoprecipitate when alpha angle < 45 degrees** | 5 pooled units of cryoprecipitate if fibrinogen < 80 mg/dL** | ||||||
Statistically significant reduction in ICU length of stay (median of 2 d in TEG arm vs 3 d in SOC. P = 0.012) | |||||||
Statistically significant reduction in amount of cryoprecipitate used. (4 units in TEG group vs 16 in SOC group. P < 0.01) | No difference in failure to control bleeding at day 5 or rebleeding at day 42. | ||||||
No difference in 5-d and 42-d mortality | |||||||
Vuyyuru et al[19] | 2019 | 58 | MonoTEM-A® | FFP 5 mL/kg when R time > 14 min*** | FFP 5 mL/kg*** if INR ≥ 1.8 | No statistically significant difference in the amount of FFP transfused (24.1% requiring FFP in the TEG group vs 27.6% in the SOC, P = 0.764) | No difference in post procedure bleeding complications (0% in both groups) |
29 TEG | Native (no activators) | ||||||
29SOC | |||||||
3 pooled units of platelets when platelet count < 50 × 109* | |||||||
3 pooled units of platelets when MA < 32 mm* | |||||||
No difference in pre and post procedure haemoglobin levels (TEG group: 11.3 ± 2.1 g/dL vs 11.2 ± 2.0 g/dL, P = 0.979; SOC group: 10.4 ± 2.1 g/dL vs 10.2 ± 2.0 g/dL, P = 0.205) | |||||||
Statistically significant reduction in platelets transfused (10.3% requiring platelet transfusion in the TEG group vs 75.9% in the SOC group, P < 0.001) |
- Citation: Wei H, Child LJ. Clinical utility of viscoelastic testing in chronic liver disease: A systematic review. World J Hepatol 2020; 12(11): 1115-1127
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v12/i11/1115.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v12.i11.1115